Boston , we have a problem !!

I see you have been having a few issues. Can you contact our tech support and we can try and figure out what is going on.
 
Thanks.

Andre , can't you reproduce this ?  both things ? 
 
i wanna collect all the things before making tikets  .....
 
My system is I7 920 , win 32 , 4gb of ram , VS 700 , dpc latency 90us ....zero issues in 5 years 
 
So defenitly i want to isolate the thing and stress ypou guyz to look for it ...again i've been playing with sonar in real use since 10 min , can't imagine nobody seen that !! or is it just me ...
 
Also one thing is killing : the double clikc on the track name doesn't work from start  iunless the track is selected before .....issue or volontary ?
 
 

Probably unrelated but I saw a thread where someone's X3 install was going into some kind of perpetual VST scan loop which was sucking up all their resources and causing a ton of problems.
 
But... probably unrelated. Just thought I'd mention it 'cause you seem to be having a heck of a time and I got nothin' else.
 
Good luck.

thks jps ...witch system spec ....?
 
Beepster : yep this is due to options check on the vst scan pref ......nothing cheked here exept scan at start ...as usual ...

Zo
thks jps ...witch system spec ....?
 
Beepster : yep this is due to options check on the vst scan pref ......nothing cheked here exept scan at start ...as usual ...

Win 8 32 bit

thks guyz ..tikets so !!
 
can anybody confirm that in preference , color , console view , we have no more option to choose the text background ? i checked X1 and we have the double of color option in Console view !!!
 
bakers if it's the case : WHY ? 
 

thks Cliff ..well the thing is that you sometime figure out that you didn't engaged it then ypou clik on and Bam all playing ....lol 
 
also here's a video i amde and see my console cosutmistaion : no way now ...we have to stik with Fashy numebre and letter  and same background for names ...to distracting , why do they give one side and take the other ....!!
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuQ4jTX77dw&lc=u2-X0cAGbRAJZ81VNDm3qgnWY6IwVrQr3SjO3ICULRU

well i just had a dropout after hit one number to switch screen set in a project at 10% of cpu !!
 
so this is more than small gui thing ...

Zo could you list your system specs and audio specs. Also your graphics card. 

Living Room Rocker

Zo
well i just had a dropout after hit one number to switch screen set in a project at 10% of cpu !!
 
so this is more than small gui thing ...

That seems unrelated to your OP and your second post (#3 to which I was resonding to).  Or is this (another of) your ranting complaint thread?

 
well i was ponting out that this wasn't just minor bugs around (as someone said ) ..
 
@swaamptooh : yep i know how solo exclusive work , what i'm saying is that when you solo several track , then hit the solo exclusiv AFTER , instead of solo Excluisvily the las one selected , it UN-Solo all !!
 
@John : well i must say that i know this is 100 % Unrelated to my system since X1 is damn rock solid on , and so 8.5 , i tried X2 few weeks ago , a free copy i had for the SAE , i was testing to see if i validated it for student and in the studio : NO WAY !! 
I had a lot of hope for X3 (that i bought to try !! since not yet demo and physical sells) , but no way for now , i give them a chance until the next update ....don't get me wrong , X3 is working and you can work without MAJOR breaks , but i refuse to use some that looks better but works less good ...the engine is definitly not on pair with the X1 D smoothness ...and very easy to spot on , it took me 10 min on X2 , same on X3 ...
 
 
Specs : Cakewalk workstation ( kinda same as pics , more recent Sonata based case ): Win7 pro 32 / X1.D /X3.B/ VS700 system /RME UCX/ I7 920  graphic ATI passive HD 4350 , dpc latency 90us on max ....stress done 514 audio tracks with the VS 700 under X1 
 

 
You know i do my very best to expose what i consider the best and most complete daw around ( also check the feedbacks i have on my Youtube videos under sonar (http://www.youtube.com/user/ZozillaThaGreat)) .....but i really doubt that i can do X3 based ones ....that was my goal !
 
my second system (where i do videos ) HP 8560W i7 2670QM , Quadro 1000m , 4GB win pro 32 ...(i didn't installed it there ...)
 
So at the end , i have a computer master Degre and also teach it at the SAE , computer course DAW oriented ...what i'm saying is that be sure that whe i post some , i try to isolate it from any integration issues ;)  you can check stress test videos on X1 ;) as well to validetated back then HP workstations for students and friends ....i'm using it since the HP 8710w ....and plan on ttesting soon the HP Z1  ...anyway thks guyz for coming in ...and i feel sorry to kinda poluate the forum , but as a Pro , i still wonder how some stuff passed the BEta , and i beta a lot of stuff around ...
 
sorry for the long post ;)

Ok anybody noticed that :
 
Track view for exemple , bus zone maximise each bus ..then n X1 when we used to scroll throw them we used to see each track taken the whole space ...not in X3 !! while doing it with arrow workkds , each mouse scrool doesn't do it ....
 
anybody can confirm this ?

I simply do NOT see this at all...
 
I can do videos if you want, but maschine loading is 6 secs from hitting ok to the folder, midi track and 16 audio tracks plus maschine VST window opening. It does take 2 secs longer than X1 however
 
 

Zo
Ok guyz here's the thing ..
 
I've been fighting with Sonar X3 since its install (and re install)) but i decided to work like nothing happened today 
 
First thing i open a template (project) and insert Maschine 16 out template !
 
Super duper slow insert !!! i was like what ? ok  i open X1 , do the same : way faster ....
 
i also changed the default track size to check if iyt wasn't this causing the issue : nope ...
 
One more thing it seem that the graphic engine of X3 is way more hungry when it comes to ram ..
 
here's the videos :
 
X1 :
 
http://s638.photobucket.com/user/zoakajeezo/media/X1maschineinsert.mp4.html
 
X3
 
http://s638.photobucket.com/user/zoakajeezo/media/X3maschineinsert.mp4.html
 
Can somebody confirm this with a multi timbrale Template (by the way i tried with a X3 saved template : same thing
 
24 sec for X1
1min04 for X3 !!

My Maschine insert (16x audio, 8x midi) also seems to take quite long. I never used it before X3 to be honest so I can't compare, but I was surprised it takes as long as it does, my system may not be the very top of the line but it's certainly no slouch.

thks guyz for checking it  and taking time ;)
 
well my template is pretty heavy as buses , plugins are in and sample on a 7200rpm drive ...but even on a regular insert (no tempplate) in noticed a big diffrence ....at the end , i just want X3 to not be worst than X1 in working areas .....

chuckebaby

Zo
Ok anybody noticed that :
 
Track view for exemple , bus zone maximise each bus ..then n X1 when we used to scroll throw them we used to see each track taken the whole space ...not in X3 !! while doing it with arrow workkds , each mouse scrool doesn't do it ....
 
anybody can confirm this ?

intendend behavior, its called fractional scrolling.

X1 : working 
X3 : not working the same
 
you're saying this is the way it's supposed to work ? if so , a pure drawback !!! if it was implemented like this in X1 this was for a reason ....am i missing something or a new way to do it ?