Nitrox32
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 121
- Joined: 2009/01/11 14:46:05
- Status: offline
Mono vs. Stereo
Why would anyone want to use mono sounds instead of stereo when using sound libraries? I've always used stereo. Aric
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/20 22:19:36
(permalink)
Hmm. Depends what you're trying to achieve, really. There aren't many standard musical instruments that have any kind of meaningful stereo image. Large things like drum kits and pianos, sure. But not a bass or a guitar. One reason for using mono signals it that it makes the individual elements of a stereo mix less prone to ambiguous positioning. Which may or may not be desirable, depending on what you're doing. I don't think either of stereo or mono can be said to be "better" than the other.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/20 22:21:36
(permalink)
There are reasons. A bass sound might have been sampled in stereo or have some sort of stereo effect on it and you might not like hearing that way in your mix. Sometimes it better to collapse it down and centre it instead. The same could be said for snares and kicks too. You might want to use three brass patches say to play three brass parts. The three brass patches might be very wide stereo wise for example but having all of them that way may not also suit your mix. So you might collapse them all down to mono and position them close togther as a tight group perhaps. Also a sound might not just need to take up an interleaved track and use two channels for plug in processing. Things could be tight CPU wise and turning some stereo sounds that you know will be centered or in just one spot can save a bit of processing power here and there too.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Vastman
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2508
- Joined: 2006/08/30 02:49:18
- Location: Oakland, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/20 22:40:01
(permalink)
This is a huge issue, bit flipper gave a recent full on exquisite discussion of these issues in response to a similar inquiry. Am mobile at the moment but just search the forum for a lot of discussion on this...it is very confusing and talked about at length
Dana We make the future... Climate Change MusicVastMaschine:SP4L/W10/i74930K/32GB/RME/CAD E100s; The Orchestra! NOVO!/Inspire/BohemianViolin&Cello, ARK1&2,/MinimalCapriccioMaximoSoto/OE1&2, Action&Emotive/Omni2/Tril/RMX/All OrangeTree/Falcon/APE Jugs/Alpha&Bravo/BFD3 & SD3Gravity/DM307/AEON/DM/Damage/Diva/HZebra/Hive/Diversion/VC4/Serum/Alchemy/blablablaSpitfire/8DIO/SL/KH/EW/NI; Shred1&2/AGF,G,M&T Torch&Res&Ren/GD-6; Ibanez SR1200&SR505NOVAX FanFret Tele&Strat
|
Nitrox32
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 121
- Joined: 2009/01/11 14:46:05
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/20 23:35:51
(permalink)
Thanks for the responses. I currently working on an orchestral project. I'd like to get a little more definition from my low brass and low woodwinds. I like the balance between the instruments but I'd like to hear more of their individual tone qualities. Each instrument is panned to where I like, I'm just wondering if using mono sounds would help. I'm know EQ would help on individual instruments but I'm afraid of doing too much as not to ruin the tonal characteristics of each instrument.
|
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8672
- Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
- Location: Mars.
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/21 01:15:19
(permalink)
Assuming it was sampled that way then yes it probably would. Well it depends what you are going for. However it probably won't make that much audible difference, it's all going to swim around in the mix one way or the other. Think about how you would go about it if you were recording an actual orchestra. Would you close mic the whole orchestra, or would just stick a few mics in front of the players? As far as reverbs are concerned for instance I would make sure all sounds are dry and put them all through the same reverb bus, I assuming here you are mainly doing one instrument at a time of course and your samples are dry(ish).
You would then "close mic" your soloists if you like as and when you please to bring out a performance (or play the instruments louder!)
Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed. @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38. Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/21 14:19:09
(permalink)
Nitrox32 Why would anyone want to use mono sounds instead of stereo when using sound libraries? I've always used stereo. Aric
Why would one prefer a blue colored car over a red colored car? When you figure this question out, you'll answer your own post. FYI: Most tracks in a song are mono and most sounds are mono
|
Vastman
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2508
- Joined: 2006/08/30 02:49:18
- Location: Oakland, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/22 05:57:32
(permalink)
Dana We make the future... Climate Change MusicVastMaschine:SP4L/W10/i74930K/32GB/RME/CAD E100s; The Orchestra! NOVO!/Inspire/BohemianViolin&Cello, ARK1&2,/MinimalCapriccioMaximoSoto/OE1&2, Action&Emotive/Omni2/Tril/RMX/All OrangeTree/Falcon/APE Jugs/Alpha&Bravo/BFD3 & SD3Gravity/DM307/AEON/DM/Damage/Diva/HZebra/Hive/Diversion/VC4/Serum/Alchemy/blablablaSpitfire/8DIO/SL/KH/EW/NI; Shred1&2/AGF,G,M&T Torch&Res&Ren/GD-6; Ibanez SR1200&SR505NOVAX FanFret Tele&Strat
|
Nitrox32
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 121
- Joined: 2009/01/11 14:46:05
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/22 09:33:21
(permalink)
Thanks for the links. In my last comment about about why would anyone would want to use mono instead of stereo, I I didn't mean to sound arrogant, I only was trying to understand the purpose of mono sounds. Sorry if I offended anyone who uses mono tracks elusively. Aric
|
Nitrox32
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 121
- Joined: 2009/01/11 14:46:05
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/22 10:01:49
(permalink)
Just to further clarify what I'm trying to achieve (if possible), I'm working on an orchestral piece that uses only woodwinds and brass. The lower voices are basically block chords. The overall chordal balance between instruments produces a nice overall sound. Because the lower voices consist of many instruments (tuba, euphonium, trombone, bari sax, tenor sax, bassoon and bass clarinet), they all are taking up the same frequency space. Because of this I have lost the characteristic sound of each instrument. What I've done so far is eq'ed out the sub bass frequencies of each instrument, narrowed the stereo field of each instrument and panned them to their proper position on the stage. The reverb is subtle and I don't feel there is a muddiness to the overall sound. As a result I hear a nice blended sound. That being said, in this situation with seven instruments occupying the same frequency space playing only block chords is achieving a blending sound the best I can hope for (which I'm fine with) or is there a way to improve the mix by using mono sounds instead of stereo to isolate each instrument. I recently posted the same question on the VSL forums. The only response that I got was that based on my situation creating a blended sound was the best I could get. Any other thoughts?
|
cowboydan
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 908
- Joined: 2012/01/13 06:10:21
- Location: Asperen, Netherlands
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/22 12:55:14
(permalink)
bitflipper
cowboydan ...I think the pan pot on a stereo track is more of a balance pot and cannot work as a pan pot. The channel tools plugin is a great work around, but I would rather see a stereo track with 2 pan pots that I can use to put left and right where I want them without using extra plugins.
This is exactly correct; the pan slider is a balance control like the "balance" knob on your stereo. It simply changes the volume of each channel inversely and will not effect the perception of position in quite the same way that you hear with mono tracks. That's not a design defect, it's just that panning in the traditional sense has no meaning on a stereo track where the two channels are fixed at hard left and right. What the Channel Tools plugin does is to treat each channel as if it was a mono track, bleeding some of the left into the right and vice versa the same way a mono track is panned. Some DAWs do indeed offer dual-pan controls for stereo tracks. If you have Superior Drummer, take a look at its mixer for an example. This gives more precise control, at the expense of some convenience. What it will not do is make the left sound "more left" and the right "more right", since your starting point in a stereo track is already hard-left and hard-right. The advantage of split-mono over using Channel Tools is that the left and right signals are now completely independent of one another and may be effected and routed separately. This can open up some interesting possibilities with delays and reverbs such as panning a reverb send to the opposite side or delaying one side of a reverb effect but not the other. You can also EQ left and right separately even if you don't have an EQ that can do that to a stereo signal, which is useful for adding width. I use Channel Tools on almost every stereo track. Say you have a luscious pad coming out of a synth that makes good use of internal panning to give movement and texture (Omnisphere's famous for that). But you don't want it to occupy the whole panorama, or need to balance it against a similar texture that's also in the mix. Channel Tools lets you move the pad(s) to one side while preserving the effect of the moving modulation within the patch. This technique is essential for any true stereo source, such as a Leslie effect. A Leslie ain't a Leslie without stereo, but the physical speaker is still usually set to one side of the stage. You normally want a Hammond to be similarly situated in the mix, off to one side but definitely in stereo.
This was the answer I got from Bitflipper. I think this would be helpfull for you. I hope so anyway.
|
wizard71
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 836
- Joined: 2012/02/12 05:45:05
- Location: UK
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/22 16:15:31
(permalink)
Nitrox32 Just to further clarify what I'm trying to achieve (if possible), I'm working on an orchestral piece that uses only woodwinds and brass. The lower voices are basically block chords. The overall chordal balance between instruments produces a nice overall sound. Because the lower voices consist of many instruments (tuba, euphonium, trombone, bari sax, tenor sax, bassoon and bass clarinet), they all are taking up the same frequency space. Because of this I have lost the characteristic sound of each instrument. What I've done so far is eq'ed out the sub bass frequencies of each instrument, narrowed the stereo field of each instrument and panned them to their proper position on the stage. The reverb is subtle and I don't feel there is a muddiness to the overall sound. As a result I hear a nice blended sound. That being said, in this situation with seven instruments occupying the same frequency space playing only block chords is achieving a blending sound the best I can hope for (which I'm fine with) or is there a way to improve the mix by using mono sounds instead of stereo to isolate each instrument. I recently posted the same question on the VSL forums. The only response that I got was that based on my situation creating a blended sound was the best I could get. Any other thoughts?
The space is created with the orchestration, not the EQ. A thick wall of sound can be created intentionally, in which case, chasing singular instrument definition would be very difficult and unnatural IMO. If you want particular instruments to shine in your piece then I think it may be a good idea to strip away some of the others that are getting in the way. Another option is to consider the register that each section is playing in. Wood winds an octave higher than the brass for instance. Also be aware that intstrumental sections give different volumes for the same dynamics so you may not write all instruments at 'forte' if you want them all to be heard. In terms of your original mono/stereo question I think that you have the right idea with placing your orchestral instruments on a stage which aside from left and right also includes front to back. This and the dynamics ( not forgetting the orchestration) should help you get the mix you desire. Bibs
post edited by wizard71 - 2014/02/23 07:54:37
http://www.youtube.com/SpaceTimeAceshttps://soundcloud.com/space-time-acesSonar Platinum - Win 8.1 x64 - Haswell 4770k - ASrock Z87 pro3 - 32gb ram - Fractal design R4 case - 3x HDD 1 USB 2.0 external 1x cr M4 ssd for samples - Octa-capture - Sontronics Aria - Sontronics STC-1s - BX8 monitors - ARC 2 system - Kawai CA63 piano - Kawai MP6 Stage piano - Fender custom Telecaster FMT - Yamaha LL6 - Fender P bass
|
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5562
- Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
- Location: Baton Rouge Area
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/22 17:58:51
(permalink)
wizard71 If you want particular instruments to shine in your piece then I think it may be a good idea to strip away some of the others that are getting in the way. Bibs
With this in mind, you bring the volume of your desired instrument up by lowering all others in same frequency range. And take this idea further by changing which instrument is highlighted in different sections of the song. This way you could hear the character of the desired instrument and alternate different instruments in different sections.
Grem Michael Music PC i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, Home PCAMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 Surface Pro 3Win 10 i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
|
RogerH
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 608
- Joined: 2007/09/10 17:50:07
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/22 21:24:43
(permalink)
A tip: Try R-mix if you want to change panning or volume of certain sounds in a sample
A song from my band: Terramater My soundcloud pageSonar Platinum Windows 7 Professional (SP1) 64Bit Intel Core i7 Quad Processor i7-2600K 3,4GHz MSI P67A-C45 (MOBO) Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz 8GB CL9 (2x4GB) Seagate Barracuda® 7200.12 1TB Seagate Barracuda® XT 2TB
[font="arial, sans-se
|
vmw
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 140
- Joined: 2003/11/17 00:56:06
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/23 01:16:38
(permalink)
Obviously this doesn't apply to your current project; but I have watched a number of tutorials/interviews about dance music as in a club and have friends that are FOH engineers and on no live sound nights act as DJs. Personally, dance is not my preferred genre but hey I am a hired gun. In clubs the preference is for mono as house speaker placement is often tied to architecture. The only time stereo appears is for an effect, or the entire stereo output has originally been very tightly panned, as in L pan one notch off centre, R pan one notch off centre. Also when I compose and mix theatre dance music for contemporary or classical dance it is often better to have most sound centred/mono so your seating position isn't subjected to unbalanced sound. Although this is really defined by architecture, so if a company is touring the work, I will make at least two mixes, one stereo and one mono.
|
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3873
- Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
- Status: offline
Re: Mono vs. Stereo
2014/02/23 04:38:55
(permalink)
If you're using that many instruments in the same range and sometimes the same notes I would agree with what some others have said; the maximum achievable is a good blend, unless you revisit your arrangement. That said, don't forget that the sound character of an instrument is made by the overtones, not the fundamental frequencies. Assuming the played parts are relatively static, you may be able to make e.g. the clarinet a bit more "clarinet-y" by boosting the overtones that differentiate it from, say, the trombone. Or attenuate the other instruments in that range, etc. Limited results predicted ;)
|