Helpful ReplyFrom Sonar 8 to 2016?

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
sammyp
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 752
  • Joined: 2004/05/20 23:39:43
  • Location: N.B. Canada
  • Status: offline
2017/04/12 04:28:22 (permalink)

From Sonar 8 to 2016?

Hi gentleman! 
 
First things first, i am no one famous etc ...i'm a guitar, bass, uke teacher in Atlantic Canada ...i have some real concerns about the new Sonar Series ...
 
My upgrade path ..Sonar 3 /4 / 8 / 8.5 / 2016 ....
 
i've been trying to use my latest for the past 3 months as my main DAW is Win 10. Sonar 8.5 won't even open files authored in 2016. Sonar 8 is normal except - the mouse on the faders in console view are  a disaster!? I've given the new Cake Bake a solid try ...i want things back to normal ....and i'd like to keep Win 10. They've made too many changes in this change  over from Roland to whoever owns it now! 
 
Opine please! I shall persvere ....i see brilliance in the new stuff ...but i feel i need a freaking university course in New Sonar to pull this off! 
 
I've been hung up on the stupidest stuff ....display clips!? a tiny icon on the left? WTF was wrong with "show layers"? 
 
You Changed the "copy" Command to cntl, alt, c .....FK that is idiocy ....get your **** together or i'll FKN go Audacity or revert to something worse like Pro Tools M Powered! Judas! Do not Fk with a good thing ...i just restored my buddies win XP PC and gave him my Sonar 3 .... i was blown away by how smooth it ran! Come on!? 
Thanks, SammyP 
 
 
post edited by sammyp - 2017/04/12 04:49:59




#1
stickman393
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1528
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 18:35:26
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 04:53:10 (permalink)
Hi Sammy -
 
You are jumping 5 major releases. Those of us who got here incrementally have had 7 years to get used to each change as it occurred.
 
Moving from "Layers" to "Take Lanes" was a particularly controversial change, and indeed, it is different now from how it was when it was first introduced. In some ways I'm envious that you get to meet the feature in its current mature state.
 
However,  there is going to be some pain, and learning time. I recommend spending serious time with the manual. And folks in this forum can be mighty helpful. 
 
Good Luck, whatever you decide!
#2
synkrotron
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5263
  • Joined: 2006/04/28 16:21:21
  • Location: Warrington, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 05:42:16 (permalink)
sammyp
I shall persvere 



In my humble opinion, definitely a big fat Yes.
 
I had a big break away from music and I jumped from Sonar 6 to X1, and I have stuck with Sonar and kept up to date since.
 
As Colin says, there will be some pain, but, in the end, I think it is worth it, and moving to Win 10 is also, IMO, a positive step, despite all the issues with "privacy."
 
Spend some time in here, as questions, as silly as they may seem, and Peeps will get you up to speed.
 
cheers,
 
and good luck,
 
andy

http://www.synkrotron.co.uk/
Intel Core™i7-3820QM Quad Core Mobile Processor 2.70GHz 8MB cache | Intel HM77 Express Chipset | 16GB SAMSUNG 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 RAM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM | 500GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | Windows 10 Pro | Roland OCTA-CAPTURE | SONAR Platinum ∞ FFS| Too many VSTi's to list here | KRK KNS-8400 Headphones | Roland JP-8000 | Oberheim OB12 | Novation Nova | Gibson SG Special | PRS Studio
#3
karhide
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 457
  • Joined: 2007/03/30 04:22:13
  • Location: Southampton / Paris
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 05:47:13 (permalink)
Defiantly worth spending some time with the manual and asking questions here.  From 8.5 is a big jump but I would not want to go back. 

Studio: Sonar Platinum/Cakewalk by Bandlab Intel Core i7 32GB RAM Samsung Evo 1TB system drive Windows 10 64bit - RME FireFace UFX - Focusrite OctoPre MK II - Audient Mico
 
Mobile: Sonar Platinum/Cakewalk by Bandlab Intel Core i7 8GB RAM Samsung Evo 1TB system drive Windows 10 64bit - RME FireFace 400
 
Mobile2: Cakewalk by Bandlab Intel Core i7 8GB RAM 256 GB System Drive Windows 10 64 bit
 
http://www.karhide.co.uk/
https://karhide.bandcamp.com
#4
tenfoot
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2186
  • Joined: 2015/01/22 18:12:07
  • Location: Qld, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 07:15:29 (permalink)
Definitely stick with it and spend the time SammyP. I had the advantage of incremental changes, but the thought of going back to an older version and giving up all of the new features and stability terrifies me!

Bruce.
 
Sonar Platinum 2017-09, Studio One 3.5.3, Win 10 x64, Quad core i7, RME Fireface, Behringer X32 Producer, Behringer X32 Rack, Presonus Faderport, Lemure Software Controller (Android), Enttec DMXIS VST lighting controller, Xtempo POK.
#5
promidi
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1220
  • Joined: 2014/11/21 18:46:39
  • Location: South Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 10:25:50 (permalink)
I have recenttly started the transition from Cakewalk Pro Audio 9 (1999) to the latest Sonar (2017.3).  Yes, there was blood and sweat and a bit of pain.  However, I am now finding things are easier to handle in Sonar.  My main concern was with Studioware and cals - but I seem to have tamed these as well.

The reason I waited so long is the PRV controllers situation prior to Sonar 2017.3.  The latest Sonar update (with their single lane PRV controllers) was a real game changer.  Before then, the PRV controllers were unworkable and a real show stopper as I use lots of controllers. (I have to use CC information as the files I make are only MIDI files)

My point is, like others have said, is perseverance will be the winner at the end of the day. Once you have worked out the new paradigm (I never thought I would be using that word) , your work flow will benefit in ways you would never think possible.

Stick with it.

Windows 10 64bit fully patched, 16 gig ram . 
PCR-800 Controller.  (Working in Win 10 1809 64bit)
CPU: i5 4670. 
Video: Nvidia GTX560ti (latest drivers).
Audio IF: Focusrite 2i2 2nd Gen

Internet always on.

Software
: Cakewalk by Bandlab (2018.09 B29)
ASIO mode. 24bit 48khz 256 samples 
Rapture Pro, AAS GS2, VS-3, EP-4, VA-2, Chromophone 2, Z3TA+ 2, Addictive drums 2, Addictive Keys, Mpowersynth (latest), Iris 2, GPO5, Sampletank 3,
#6
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 11:19:36 (permalink)
Your in a time warp bro. Its like driving a 1956 Buick and then buying a 2017 Corvette...then saying where's the handle to roll down the window.
 
Its not uncommon though and your not alone. A lot of people who make this jump say the same thing. Then after a few months of using the new tools realize how easy it is now. This forum and Documentation is your best friend.
Cheers.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#7
patm300e
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 845
  • Joined: 2007/09/28 09:14:18
  • Location: USA - Maryland
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 11:28:40 (permalink)
Same thing happened to me when I went from analog to digital mixer...What you can route anything anywhere?  That takes a while to wrap your head around when have been  used to fixed knobs and buttons EVERYWHERE!  But like everyone else has said stick with it!  SONAR is definitely worth the time.  At least you have a basis in SONAR!  That will help.  It is like changing programming languages.  You know WHAT you want to do, but the syntax is different.  AND you can discover new and possibly better ways to do things!
 
Good luck and Happy Learning!
 
 

SPLAT on a Home built i3 16 GB RAM 64-bit Windows 10 Home Premium 120GB SSD (OS) 2TB Data Drive.  Behringer XR-18 USB 2.0 Interface. FaderPort control.
#8
henkejs
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 489
  • Joined: 2004/10/31 13:14:15
  • Location: Seattle, WA
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 15:00:19 (permalink)
I went from SONAR 8 to Platinum last summer, and I'm still figuring things out. A few things seemed easier in the old version, but that's probably because I was used to them the way they were. Lots of great new stuff, though.
 
Hang in there, you'll be OK.

A few of my songs
 
SONAR Platinum, Cakewalk by BandLab, Windows 10, Focusrite Scarlett 6i6.
#9
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 15:12:59 (permalink)
sammyp
i just restored my buddies win XP PC and gave him my Sonar 3 .... 

You do know that is illegal, right?. You cannot sell or give away any SONAR product. You are the license holder, not your buddy.
 
#10
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5449
  • Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
  • Location: SE Florida
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 15:30:49 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby paulo 2017/04/13 19:48:59
bapu
sammyp
i just restored my buddies win XP PC and gave him my Sonar 3 .... 

You do know that is illegal, right?. You cannot sell or give away any SONAR product. You are the license holder, not your buddy.
 



is his buddy allowed to give it back to him?

ASUS P8P67, i7-2600K, CORSAIR 16GB, HIS 5450, 3 Samsung SSD 850, Win7 64, RME AIO.
 
https://timbowman.bandcamp.com/releases
 
#11
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/12 15:47:07 (permalink)
SONAR has been good about files created in newer version being able to be opened in prior versions (sans supported items from the newer version).

This changed when AUX tracks were introduced. Projects containing them cannot be opened in previous SONAR versions, so realize the limitations of "backward compatibility" of a project file. This would also limit collaboration or sharing of projects in a teaching environment.

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#12
williamcopper
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1120
  • Joined: 2014/11/03 09:22:03
  • Location: Virginia, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/13 06:39:54 (permalink)
I have to agree.  I simply LIKED sonar 5, and before.   While I use sonar platinum every day, I still don't LIKE it.  Often I HATE it. 
#13
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/13 11:48:01 (permalink)
sammyp
Sonar 8.5 won't even open files authored in 2016. 



We are all used to programs being backwards compatible with older versions, but it sounds like you're expecting 8.5 to be FORWARDS compatible.
 
Not sure how that's supposed to work to be honest.
 

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#14
musicroom
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2421
  • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/13 19:38:57 (permalink)
sammyp
 
You Changed the "copy" Command to cntl, alt, c  




 
That's news to me Sammy. But in retrospect, I typically copy clips with a control click drag.
 
 
Good luck - I wouldn't like going back to Sonar 8 again...

 
Dave
Songs
___________________________________
Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



 
 
#15
DrLumen
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 621
  • Joined: 2005/07/05 20:11:34
  • Location: North Texas
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/13 23:12:52 (permalink)
I too made a quantum leap and I'm still having to re-find ways to do things.  I think I like the new version better but there are still some things I miss (or cant find) in the new version. CAL anyone?
 
The VST/VSTI's are cool. Gotta love those! But wholly crap there are slews of drop downs and cursor controls and smart do-hickeys and nested sub-tracks and collapsed take lanes and post and pre and bus sends and becan fryers and ... But, I think it is better. I will be the first to say I'm just a hobbyist that doesn't spend as much time in it as most other seem to do so I know my exposure is limited.

-When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

Sonar Platinum / Intel i7-4790K / AsRock Z97 / 32GB RAM / Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB / Behringer FCA610 / M-Audio Sport 2x4 / Win7 x64 Pro / WDC Black HDD's / EVO 850 SSD's / Alesis Q88 / Boss DS-330 / Korg nanoKontrol / Novation Launch Control / 14.5" Lava Lamp
#16
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 15:38:05 (permalink)
DrLumen
...and becan fryers and ... But, I think it is better.



That sums it up nicely. 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
#17
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5449
  • Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
  • Location: SE Florida
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 15:42:38 (permalink)
Be aware that any upgrade of Platinum beyond Dec 2016 will screw up your 8.5 install/usage.
In particular the plugin manager.

ASUS P8P67, i7-2600K, CORSAIR 16GB, HIS 5450, 3 Samsung SSD 850, Win7 64, RME AIO.
 
https://timbowman.bandcamp.com/releases
 
#18
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 15:49:58 (permalink)
AFAIK, the only problem with the plug-in manager is backward compatibility of menu layouts. Is there anything else? There is a pretty easy workaround to maintain the old plug-in manager for menu layout editing. The thread you  created provided the implementation details although there is a tool available to avoid having to use regedit to maintain SONAR tools entries.
#19
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8424
  • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 15:59:49 (permalink)
The funny thing about these sort of threads is they always contain a threat to move to another DAW. That's hilarious :) 
As if that will be easier than sorting out the few changes that have happened to Sonar. 
 
I jumped from 8.5 to X3 Studio. It was no big deal because I had been following this forum so I knew what to expect. And after about a week I forgot all about 8.5. I opened it the other day to help a form member who was using it and it was nice a bright and cheery to look at. But man, there's no way we'ed get anything done using it now. There's a lot missing that we forgot about. As a matter of fact, I use the new version of Home Studio and that's about on Par with 8.5 pro. It's possibly even got more going on. 

Johnny V  
Cakelab  
Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
 http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
 
 
#20
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5449
  • Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
  • Location: SE Florida
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 20:07:42 (permalink)
Thanks scook.
 
scook
AFAIK, the only problem with the plug-in manager is backward compatibility of menu layouts. Is there anything else? 



I don't think it's a matter of 'backward compatibility' of menu layouts, being that after a Splat install, you can't create new or revise layouts in 8.53. It's more like, Splat broke 8.53's plugin manager capabilities. (I would say that not being able to use Splat menu layouts in 8.53 would be understandable and lacking 'backward compatibility').
 
scook
There is a pretty easy workaround to maintain the old plug-in manager for menu layout editing. The thread you  created provided the implementation details although there is a tool available to avoid having to use regedit to maintain SONAR tools entries.

 
I looked thru my thread, if you are referring to this one:
http://forum.cakewalk.com/Plugin-manager-not-working-in-853-after-Splat-install-m3579913.aspx
 
I didn't see anything that appeared "easy", at least to me. Are you referring to ralf's idea on page 2 ?
TBH, I have an aversion to editing the registry. And, I'm not sure I understood every detail of what he said.
 
What "tool" are you referring to?
 
Thanks scook
 
 

ASUS P8P67, i7-2600K, CORSAIR 16GB, HIS 5450, 3 Samsung SSD 850, Win7 64, RME AIO.
 
https://timbowman.bandcamp.com/releases
 
#21
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 20:38:17 (permalink)
timidi
I don't think it's a matter of 'backward compatibility' of menu layouts, being that after a Splat install, you can't create new or revise layouts in 8.53. It's more like, Splat broke 8.53's plugin manager capabilities. (I would say that not being able to use Splat menu layouts in 8.53 would be understandable and lacking 'backward compatibility').

This is precisely why I prefer not to to discuss the matter with you.
#22
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5449
  • Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
  • Location: SE Florida
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 21:49:31 (permalink)
scook
timidi
I don't think it's a matter of 'backward compatibility' of menu layouts, being that after a Splat install, you can't create new or revise layouts in 8.53. It's more like, Splat broke 8.53's plugin manager capabilities. (I would say that not being able to use Splat menu layouts in 8.53 would be understandable and lacking 'backward compatibility').

This is precisely why I prefer not to to discuss the matter with you.




Well, that sure is interesting. 

ASUS P8P67, i7-2600K, CORSAIR 16GB, HIS 5450, 3 Samsung SSD 850, Win7 64, RME AIO.
 
https://timbowman.bandcamp.com/releases
 
#23
Woodyoflop
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 281
  • Joined: 2008/11/07 01:14:55
  • Location: Georgia and Washington (depending on time of year)
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 22:16:09 (permalink)
I took a break away from music for awhile as well. I'm not one of you older guys on here, i started on Sonar 7 studio and worked my way up to 8.5 before taking my break. When i started up again i went straight into X3 and it was a whole new world but well worth it. Once you get used to it, it feels so much smoother and detailed than the older Sonars. I still have 8.5 on my old laptop which I still use in a pinch every now and again on the road, but Platinum is amazing. Stick with it. If you have questions these are probably some of the most interactive forums I've ever seen and always get answers to my questions when I present one.
#24
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3922
  • Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
  • Location: Victoria, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/15 23:13:38 (permalink)
I stuck with Sonar 7 for a few years and was quite happy with it. But there was one single feature of X2 that attracted me and made me want to upgrade. That was Screensets. The only thing that had annoyed me about working with that older version of Sonar was the need to keep opening, closing and re-opening Console View and PRV, with the need to re-congigure PRV each time. Screensets solved that problem.

SonarPlatinum(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)
FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
Having fun at work lately
#25
melmyers
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 157
  • Joined: 2008/08/11 13:08:29
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/16 01:48:26 (permalink)
You're dealing with a massive learning curve because you waited so long to update. I started with Sonar 8 and have purchased every update since. Those of us who did that have been able to keep up with improvements on an incremental basis. If you stick with it, you'll see that the latest version of Sonar is a superior program, and the forum here is a great resource for you. When you get hung up on a certain aspect, search here, because it's probably already been covered at some point. 

Mel Myers
Producer/Songwriter/Voiceover Talent
Sonar Platinum 64-bit/Intel Quad Core i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz 16GB RAM/LGA1155 Motherboard/Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit /Focusrite 18i20/Cakewalk A-800 Pro/UAD-2 Quad PCIe/& a black and white Pomeranian who thinks he's the boss
#26
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3922
  • Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
  • Location: Victoria, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/16 01:57:19 (permalink)
After upgrading, the biggest stumbling block for me was the new menu structure. Features that I was already familiar with had been moved to different places and I didn't always know where to look.

SonarPlatinum(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)
FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
Having fun at work lately
#27
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/16 11:37:56 (permalink)
Kev999
I stuck with Sonar 7 for a few years and was quite happy with it. But there was one single feature of X2 that attracted me and made me want to upgrade. That was Screensets.




Dude, Totally agree. its one of my favorite features still to this day.
I haven't bought in to Lenses yet but screensets is worth an ounce in gold to me.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#28
Zargg
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10666
  • Joined: 2014/09/28 04:20:14
  • Location: Norway
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/16 13:09:01 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby chuckebaby 2017/04/16 16:13:16
Hi. I made the jump from SONAR 4 Producer to SONAR X3.
It was massive!!
But learned to love it (and the version(s) coming after).
I just made baby-steps. Learn one thing each week / month.. 
Record, level, pan, eq, comp etc...
Suddenly things are looking brighter / easier 
All the best.

Ken Nilsen
Zargg
BBZ
Win 10 Pro X64, Cakewalk by Bandlab, SPlat X64, AMD AM3+ fx-8320, 16Gb RAM, RME Ucx (+ ARC), Tascam FW 1884, M-Audio Keystation 61es, *AKAI MPK Pro 25, *Softube Console1, Alesis DM6 USB, Maschine MkII
Laptop setup: Win 10 X64, i5 2.4ghz, 8gb RAM, 320gb 7200 RPM HD, Focusrite Solo, + *
 
#29
LongJohnBaldy
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 35
  • Joined: 2017/04/02 15:54:16
  • Status: offline
Re: From Sonar 8 to 2016? 2017/04/17 22:04:10 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby DrLumen 2017/04/18 00:12:43
The only thing I miss from the old days is THE SCREAM panic button.

#30
Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1