High-pass filter on entire mix

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
Ed Grimley
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Joined: 2008/06/02 18:01:23
  • Status: offline
2008/06/02 18:39:23 (permalink)

High-pass filter on entire mix

Do any of you use a high-pass filter on your entire mix? If so, where do you make the cut? 32hz, 40hz, 60hz, 80hz? I must say, although it is not considered a professional technique, it certainly is a quick and simple way to clear things up.
#1

72 Replies Related Threads

    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 18:47:12 (permalink)
    I use a highpass on almost every single track and on most every bus including the master bus. The frequency i set it at is determined at the frequency of the instrument on that track and the frequency i set it on the master bus is determined by the sound of the entire mix. That being said, the average cut is around 40to 60hz's
    Cj

    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #2
    Jose7822
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10031
    • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 19:13:42 (permalink)
    Cut anywhere between 20 to 30Hz.


    HTH
    #3
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 19:23:28 (permalink)
    Hi Ed,


    As CJ mentioned, using high-pass filters on individual tracks does wonders for cleaning up a typical mix.

    If you use a high-pass on the master, I wouldn't set it too high.
    Just filter out the lowest of the sub-bass region. ~25-35Hz

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #4
    jcpzero
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 216
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 14:53:57
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 19:43:35 (permalink)

    As I am learning mixing techniques myself:

    Cutting the master as mentioned 20-30hz range. I am also cutting on individual tracks to make room for the bass, etc. These techniques are working for me, give them a try.


    Jon
    #5
    mose
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 513
    • Joined: 2007/12/02 23:08:17
    • Location: Nebraska
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 20:22:16 (permalink)
    If the target is MP3, then you may want to cut even lower, perhaps 17KHz or even 15KHz, because MP3 does not handle high frequencies very well. If the target is CD, then nothing above 20KHz will be of any value. Besides, 20KHz is the very upper end of what most people can hear, if they even have something that can reproduce it. Filtering on individual tracks is useful for keeping one instrument from stomping on another.

    www.soundclick.com/russellmosemann (Electronica flavored ear candy)
    #6
    spindlebox
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2645
    • Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
    • Location: Kansas City, MO
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 20:33:22 (permalink)
    I only use highpass judiciously; to move things around the stereo spectrum when and if needed. I just try and get a nice clean signal at the beginning and go from there.


     

     
    #7
    plainfaced
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1617
    • Joined: 2004/08/25 08:52:16
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 20:40:43 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: mose

    If the target is MP3, then you may want to cut even lower, perhaps 17KHz or even 15KHz, because MP3 does not handle high frequencies very well. If the target is CD, then nothing above 20KHz will be of any value. Besides, 20KHz is the very upper end of what most people can hear, if they even have something that can reproduce it. Filtering on individual tracks is useful for keeping one instrument from stomping on another.


    Mose. You are getting your highs and lows mixed up..


    Sonar Professional | Reason 8 | Propellerheads Balance | Windows 10
    #8
    robby
    Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5819
    • Joined: 2006/05/13 15:53:45
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 20:54:45 (permalink)
    I love you guys, one can learn so much simply by reading these posts.

    ==================
    It is better to travel well than to arrive.

    www.reverbnation.com/rockinrobby
    #9
    twisted6s
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2001
    • Joined: 2007/08/21 21:10:33
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 21:02:45 (permalink)
    I do this alot since the lows are the frequencies that need the most isolation

    Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.0 ghz processor, 8 gig ram, 2.5Tb drives, Sonar Platinum, Lynx L22, FMR Audio RNP & RNC, Mackie HR824, Neumann tlm 103, Window 10 64
    https://soundcloud.com/twisted6s/sets/tony-pruden

     
          
    #10
    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/02 22:09:13 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: mose

    If the target is MP3, then you may want to cut even lower, perhaps 17KHz or even 15KHz, because MP3 does not handle high frequencies very well. If the target is CD, then nothing above 20KHz will be of any value. Besides, 20KHz is the very upper end of what most people can hear, if they even have something that can reproduce it. Filtering on individual tracks is useful for keeping one instrument from stomping on another.

    He's asking for a highpass not a lowpass filter
    Cj

    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #11
    Junski
    Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1570
    • Joined: 2003/11/10 07:29:13
    • Location: FI
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 00:09:47 (permalink)
    How steep the HP filter needs to be (6dB, 12dB, 18dB...48dB, 72dB? /octave)?

    I'm normally using a 36dB/oct filter ... is it steep enough?

    Junski


    #12
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 00:17:17 (permalink)
    I do put the UAD Cambridge EQ on the final mix and cut off everyting below 30Hz and above 17KHz. I mix into this filter as a final step to finishing the mix. The Cambridge has the steepest slopes I have seen so it is perfect for the task. I the check my mix and make any last minute low end changes. When the rumble and brittle high end are gone I usually hear things that I want to change with the overall EQ to make it sound better.

    Then I dump this EQ and Export the file. I don't want it in the final file as most mastering houses do a much better job on these cuts then I can inside the box. Even if I end up mastering the file, I can reintroduce this step later.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #13
    mose
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 513
    • Joined: 2007/12/02 23:08:17
    • Location: Nebraska
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 06:38:45 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: plainfaced
    Mose. You are getting your highs and lows mixed up..

    AARRGGG!!! I still stand by the information, though.

    www.soundclick.com/russellmosemann (Electronica flavored ear candy)
    #14
    RKM33
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 261
    • Joined: 2006/04/16 19:38:06
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 09:08:58 (permalink)
    I wanted to experiment with this in the simplest way possible. So, using Scott's book, I went to Process-Audio Effects-Cakewalk-2 band EQ. I have no 2 band EQ in the drop down. I also have no Parametric EQ. The only thing in there is ParamEq, the regular FxEq and Sonitus. Any idea where I can find the ones I'm looking for?

    Thanks,
    Rick
    #15
    tweeksound
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 53
    • Joined: 2008/06/02 08:26:25
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 09:19:34 (permalink)
    If the target is MP3, then you may want to cut even lower, perhaps 17KHz or even 15KHz, because MP3 does not handle high frequencies very well. If the target is CD, then nothing above 20KHz will be of any value. Besides, 20KHz is the very upper end of what most people can hear, if they even have something that can reproduce it. Filtering on individual tracks is useful for keeping one instrument from stomping on another.
    \

    That's low pass filtering.

    HPF are great for cleaning up the low "rumble" freq's that will only take up disproportionate amounts of headroom and have your speakers working harder for nothing.

    I HPF almost everything but kick in most music.
    I HPF the bass just enough to give the kick it's own real estate.
    Then most everything else get the "thin" treatment :0)
    Solo'd they don't always sound thick and heavy but with the kick nd bass, they gel perfectly and I know that my poor monitors aren't trying to reproduce 8Hz and the rest of my waveform isn't riding on a giant death wave!


    For CD's and MP3s, unless the 9K-22.05K region is interfering with another instruments or sound too abrasive, I would not recommend filtering it out.
    They don't harm anything and CDs and MP3s can use all the sheen they can get :0)

    Great post!
    post edited by tweeksound - 2008/06/03 09:21:25
    #16
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 09:19:37 (permalink)
    Sonitus


    The Sonitus EQ has a high-pass filter.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #17
    RKM33
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 261
    • Joined: 2006/04/16 19:38:06
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 09:33:29 (permalink)
    The Sonitus EQ has a high-pass filter.


    What would the Sonitus high-pass preset be, just as a starting point.

    What do you suppose happened to my 2 band, etc?

    Rick
    #18
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2008/06/03 09:33:44 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2018/12/23 00:58:33
    #19
    jinga8
    Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5817
    • Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
    • Location: Oceanside, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 09:44:08 (permalink)
    What do you suppose happened to my 2 band, etc?

    Since it is such an old effect, it is no longer installed by default. If you put the DVD in and go through the install, choosing ONLY to install FX, you can check-off all the old effects and just install them. Since we have much better tools now (Sonitus), Cakewalk leaves them available but does not install them automatically.
    #20
    emwhy
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1402
    • Joined: 2006/01/03 15:09:02
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 09:52:30 (permalink)
    I think high pass filtering is a great idea, but you really have to trust your ears, your monitors and your room. It does clean things up and make certain instruments jump out the way they should.
    #21
    Roflcopter
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6767
    • Joined: 2007/04/27 19:10:06
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 10:06:50 (permalink)
    AARRGGG!!! I still stand by the information, though.


    Well, it's a fact that quite a lot of music greatly benefits if you toss out anything below 17K.

    [BTW I agree with Spindlebox that you shouldn't use it out of habit, although most here probably see it as a kind of cure-all.]

    I'm a perfectionist, and perfect is a skinned knee.
    #22
    losguy
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5506
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
    • Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 10:29:53 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: mike_mccue


    ORIGINAL: Junski

    How steep the HP filter needs to be (6dB, 12dB, 18dB...48dB, 72dB? /octave)?

    I'm normally using a 36dB/oct filter ... is it steep enough?

    Junski



    I use the Sonitus hi-pass EQ with a "Q" of 1.6

    Does anyone have practical way of comparing "Q" in Sonitus FX EQ to a dB/octave slope?

    best regards,
    mike

    Generally, the Q will change the sharpness of the corner, but not affect the slope far below the highpass corner. I'll leave the specifics (Q vs corner slope) for someone who has worked it out...

    Psalm 30:12
    All pure waves converge at the Origin
    #23
    Roflcopter
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6767
    • Joined: 2007/04/27 19:10:06
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 10:34:30 (permalink)
    I'll leave the specifics (Q vs corner slope) for someone who has worked it out...


    Yes, lets.

    http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-bandwidth.htm

    I'm a perfectionist, and perfect is a skinned knee.
    #24
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2008/06/03 10:41:49 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2018/12/23 00:58:49
    #25
    Roflcopter
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6767
    • Joined: 2007/04/27 19:10:06
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 10:52:15 (permalink)
    If it needs doing, it needs doing. But there's plenty more that can muddy up a mix like ambience *not* in that register. I take down ambience on synths and samples before I even check the need for highpass. I'll concede that if you do mainly live recording with loadsa noise you probably use it a lot more than in a more sterile studio situation. I do check what my filters do during live recording at one point, and usually leave it on if I even suspect a rumble.

    I'm a perfectionist, and perfect is a skinned knee.
    #26
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2008/06/03 10:56:06 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2018/12/23 00:59:02
    #27
    Roflcopter
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6767
    • Joined: 2007/04/27 19:10:06
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 11:09:08 (permalink)
    Studio talk refers to bandwidth in terms of octaves or parts of an octave. Design engineers, on the other hand, call this filter parameter Q, which stands for Quality.


    http://www.ethanwiner.com/filters.html

    I'm a perfectionist, and perfect is a skinned knee.
    #28
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2008/06/03 11:19:19 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by The Maillard Reaction - 2018/12/23 00:59:21
    #29
    Razorwit
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1235
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:39:32
    • Location: SLC, UT
    • Status: offline
    RE: High-pass filter on entire mix 2008/06/03 11:21:44 (permalink)
    FWIW I was just reading an SOS article where Tom Elmherst was talking about what he did as mix engineer for Amy Winehouse's "Rehab" and he refers to shelving her lead vox at 40 Hz.

    Dean
    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1