lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
If you don't like the new X1 style of working, will there be products in the Sonar line that will keep being developed over the years to come? I'm thinking Home Studio or whatever. Or will all stuff switch to X1 style? You want to stay with a product that is maintained over the years, that bugs are fixed etc. What do you think? If even Cake would care to comment I would be much obliged. Thanks.
|
guitarmikeh
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 942
- Joined: 2005/03/11 23:16:02
- Location: ?
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 01:25:04
(permalink)
they have said it's EOL (End Of Life). so no, X_ is they're path forward. no more updates for Sonar 8xxx
post edited by guitarmikeh - 2010/12/19 01:26:44
I harbor no ill will towards any man.
|
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 03:06:38
(permalink)
Thanks. Time to look for a new daw then.
|
guitarmikeh
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 942
- Joined: 2005/03/11 23:16:02
- Location: ?
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 04:58:48
(permalink)
lfm Thanks. Time to look for a new daw then. but why? I mean I understand what you wrote but is 8.5 not working for you? and x1 not a viable option? it is like using a new DAW but with lot of familiarities. just wondering.
I harbor no ill will towards any man.
|
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 06:00:41
(permalink)
8.5 seems to work ok besides the V-Vocal that has serious issues. It seems you have to follow strict rules not leaving it in your projects. And regretfully S8 still has some of the bugs I reported 4-5 years ago. But wanting to upgrade(eventually in future) means X1 and you have to adapt to a new style of working. It's not just improved. I think it will take years before Cake fully has filled in the blanks on X1 to correspond to S8.x even. It seems that X1 has lost a lot of customization options, both on colorsettings as well as keyboard shortcuts. Quite a few has expressed frustration over this. I remember just hating 8.5 standard theme and could not see anything due to the dark interface. Spent an evening fixing it up and it's just fine. But if you lost ability to customize many things, where are you then? I first thought I'd wait for X1 demo and try for myself but sort of changed my mind. Too many things has been confirmed from several long time users. And demo is usually a couple of month after release as I've seen from 2005 and onward. It's too late for me to shift daw then shifting to fulltime musicproduction(Q2 2011). I want stuff that can be trusted and that I'm well aquanted with. Not go through what the guy did that stumbled for a day to get an export done on X1. We'll see, I thought I was done testings daws. The one I hope the most of is not x64 until next year some time so I'm screwed there too.
|
Skyline_UK
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2004/04/15 17:55:09
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 07:09:14
(permalink)
Interesting that Cakewalk have chosen to keep two separate forums for 8.5 and X1. I suggest they are fully aware that in attempting to make the leap to greater market share (in Europe particularly, hence the many visits by their gurus and PR folk) currently occupied by Cubase at al, they have to risk alienating users (such as myself) that originally chose Sonar because it WASN'T Cubase or Logic having tried their demos and found their GUIs obscure and impenetratable. I don't blame Cakewalk for making such a move in order to grow the business, but I think my long association with Sonar is now looking like it's at an end. John
My stuff Intel Sandy Bridge i7 2600 @ 3.4GHz, 4 cores, 8 threads, 16GB RAM.OS & Programs drive: 240GB SSD Data drives: 1 x 1TB drive RAID mirrored, plus extra 1TB data drive Windows 10 Home 64 bit Cakewalk by BandLab 64 bit, Studio One 3, Band In A Box 2016, Ozone 8+ too many other pluginsBandLab page
|
geetsifly
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 192
- Joined: 2008/10/17 23:33:53
- Location: an undisclosed location outside Chicago
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 09:08:58
(permalink)
Hi Skyline, I am personally no huge fan of how X1 has rolled out. That being said its no different than any other Cakewalk release in that they eventually get it patched and up to snuff. What I do not understand is why so quick to jump ship? I personally will not be upgrading soon but I will watch X1 and if things level out, upgrade after a patch or two. If they do not I might put my money into hardware for a while and hang out on version 8.5. Or... I might even skip a whole version this time to allow some of the more significant UI issues to get ironed out. Its not like non of the pre 8 skills I've acquired over the years will translate to X1. If still nothing then I'll start looking for a new platform with the assumption that I'll have to take my lumps on a big learning curve and that whoever it is will have their own nagging issues as well. Is there something in 8.5 that is preventing you from working? George
post edited by geetsifly - 2010/12/19 09:11:49
|
Skyline_UK
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2004/04/15 17:55:09
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 09:18:04
(permalink)
George, No, like you I'll stick with 8.5 as it works (apart from the annoying MIDI leaks bug which should have been fixed years ago) and I've invested a lot. It's like I'm also sticking with XP until there's no support and simply have to move on! John
My stuff Intel Sandy Bridge i7 2600 @ 3.4GHz, 4 cores, 8 threads, 16GB RAM.OS & Programs drive: 240GB SSD Data drives: 1 x 1TB drive RAID mirrored, plus extra 1TB data drive Windows 10 Home 64 bit Cakewalk by BandLab 64 bit, Studio One 3, Band In A Box 2016, Ozone 8+ too many other pluginsBandLab page
|
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 11:57:53
(permalink)
Yes, they could have cleaned up the act with a 8.5.4 in between. Then possibly you could wait and see how X1 evolves to X2 or whatever if having something you trust to work with. But I don't think they anticipated such mixed receival of X1 and obviously did not think about how it usually is until patch 2 or so.
|
randyman
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 182
- Joined: 2005/05/17 20:44:11
- Location: ga
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/19 13:01:34
(permalink)
I guess I have never understood these types of things. While I've been a user of Cake since version 1.1 and have copies of each release - 2.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, (oops, I guess I skipped 7), 8 and soon X1, I've only used three of them. 2.2, 4 and 6. And while I've used PT, Cubase and RADAR professionally (and still have to if requested) - Cake is personal choice though. I figured out a long time ago you can chase the latest, different platforms, different 'software houses' for recording work, but you can be better off with the devil you know than the one you don't. With ANY product, the interface will changes, bugs or problems will get solved, and new 'undocumented features' will be discovered. I try no to get stuck on why something doesn't work, but how can I accomplish what I need to get done with the tools that I've got. As with any sport, the equipment can be beneficial, but the talent of how to use can't be bought - only learned.
A rack of noisemakers is not a definitive substitute for creativity. (though it does seem to help) what I spend my lunch time doing: (don't laugh - its just for fun!) www.soundclick.com/rnewburn
|
Rothchild
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1479
- Joined: 2003/11/27 13:15:24
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 07:54:20
(permalink)
Yeah, despite the repeated mantra, to people who find X1 doesn't work to their satisfaction, that you 'don't have to upgrade' it does appear that 8.5.3 is abandonware. It's been taken out of the list of apps on the bug reporter (I've not tried the FR form yet but I guess it's the same). So arming the mute button from my MCU will never happen, inserting a send without it being switched on and up remains a pipe dream and having v-vocal be stable too. Sonar remains great software, and the closest to how I want to work, but this business model is growing it away from my needs rather than towards it. I'd love to know how many 'case characters' or 'average users' cake have, what their usage is about and how that informs the decisions they make. When Eratu had his workflow thread many people chimed in saying (practically): "yeah, whatever, some workflow tweaks and changes would be welcome but not before you've ironed out all these stupid legacy bugs we've all seen for generations of software now, stop putting in new features and give us a 'perfect' daw'" IMO 8.5.3 should be considered feature complete, but that shouldn't stop it receiving patches to ensure it actually works as sold, once the snag list is complete then it can be called 'done' and the rest of those resources can go in to the new shiny thing. Child
|
daveny5
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16934
- Joined: 2003/11/06 09:54:36
- Location: North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 08:45:52
(permalink)
X1 is now the product line. Love it or leave it. Every new release is met with those who love it and those who don't. It will settle down once the first set of patches is released.
post edited by daveny5 - 2010/12/20 08:47:21
Dave Computer: Intel i7, ASROCK H170M, 16GB/5TB+, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, TASCAM US-16x08, Cakewalk UM-3G MIDI I/F Instruments: SL-880 Keyboard controller, Korg 05R/W, Korg N1R, KORG Wavestation EX Axes: Fender Stratocaster, Line6 Variax 300, Ovation Acoustic, Takamine Nylon Acoustic, Behringer GX212 amp, Shure SM-58 mic, Rode NT1 condenser mic. Outboard: Mackie 1402-VLZ mixer, TC Helicon VoiceLive 2, Digitech Vocalist WS EX, PODXTLive, various stompboxes and stuff. Controllers: Korg nanoKONTROL, Wacom Bamboo Touchpad
|
Rothchild
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1479
- Joined: 2003/11/27 13:15:24
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 08:47:13
(permalink)
daveny5 X1 is now the product line. Love it or leave it. Any tips on where I might leave to?
|
daveny5
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16934
- Joined: 2003/11/06 09:54:36
- Location: North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 08:48:44
(permalink)
Rothchild daveny5 X1 is now the product line. Love it or leave it. Any tips on where I might leave to? No, because I am sticking with Sonar. There's some good things in X1 if you take the time to work with it.
Dave Computer: Intel i7, ASROCK H170M, 16GB/5TB+, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, TASCAM US-16x08, Cakewalk UM-3G MIDI I/F Instruments: SL-880 Keyboard controller, Korg 05R/W, Korg N1R, KORG Wavestation EX Axes: Fender Stratocaster, Line6 Variax 300, Ovation Acoustic, Takamine Nylon Acoustic, Behringer GX212 amp, Shure SM-58 mic, Rode NT1 condenser mic. Outboard: Mackie 1402-VLZ mixer, TC Helicon VoiceLive 2, Digitech Vocalist WS EX, PODXTLive, various stompboxes and stuff. Controllers: Korg nanoKONTROL, Wacom Bamboo Touchpad
|
Rothchild
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1479
- Joined: 2003/11/27 13:15:24
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 09:12:21
(permalink)
daveny5 Rothchild daveny5 X1 is now the product line. Love it or leave it. Any tips on where I might leave to? No, because I am sticking with Sonar. There's some good things in X1 if you take the time to work with it. I have no doubt of this. However, there is a bunch of new stuff that clearly doesn't quite work right and there's still a bunch of old stuff that's never quite worked right that still isn't fixed. £100 a year for 'nearly but not quite - jam tomorrow' is growing a bit tiresome. Oh well, what I've got works ok. Tracktion appears to be discontinued, Reaper doesn't really do it for me (can't use it as effectively without the cv) and Studio One looks very similar (to x1 and Reaper). Child
|
Frostysnake
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 722
- Joined: 2006/10/26 14:31:38
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 09:23:29
(permalink)
All the crying here is so predictable. I subscribe to a few here. Go with what works for YOU. I have never had any problems getting things done in Sonar. Haven't gone to X1 yet, but I plan to. It's all a personal choice. No one made you buy Sonar. No one has made you stick with it if it gave you problems. The same will be for X1. In the meanwhile, I'm going to pour a glass of my freshly brewed Scottish Ale and hit the studio...cheers all!
Sonar Platinum Windows 7 64-bit 1 TB Hard Drive\Seagate 500 GB Slave VS-100 MOTU 2408 MK3 A-Pro 800
|
PH68
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2007/07/24 17:09:34
- Location: England
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 12:21:23
(permalink)
As soon as a new version of a CW product comes out, then kiss goodbye to any patch fixes for the old versions. I suspect in a few months time this sub-forum will be pretty much dead. Most generic Sonar question s will be on the X1 forum,as that's where the new users will go. I have used Sonar since version 2, but never upgraded beyond Sonar 7PE. It still works for my needs and I can find my way around for what I need to do. I know what it can do for me, and what it can't. When it decides to "die" then I'll look around and see whats available. Remember, just because CW have a new version of Sonar out... it does not mean you have to buy it!
~ Cakewalk ~ Arturia ~ Waves ~ Overloud ~ Windows ~
|
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8594
- Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
- Location: betwixt and between
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 13:01:24
(permalink)
Rothchild - Cubase is prob the closest in terms of workflow to Sonar. But you have to ride the Steinberg monster with that option. I'd stick with Sonar 8.5 for now, and see how x1a/x1.5 pans out.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 13:16:53
(permalink)
While it's true no one is being forced to migrate (sorry, I can't bring myself to use the word "upgrade") to X1, staying with an old version isn't a desirable long-term option. It means whatever bugs and shortcomings are there now will always be there. Even if they're mostly minor annoyances, over time they will be like a pebble in your shoe, eventually compelling you to switch platforms, whether that means switching to Xx or some other product. Nobody I know is still running MS Word 2.0, even though it did everything I needed, and was much faster than its successors. My current plan is to wait for X2 and see if it signals a return to functional progress over cosmetic change for its own sake. Being an optimist, I really do think that's what will happen. I fully expect to be back onboard come next fall. Of course, in the meantime it's only prudent to look at other options.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Rothchild
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1479
- Joined: 2003/11/27 13:15:24
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/20 13:50:52
(permalink)
Well put Bit, That's about where I am. As I mentioned I still prefer the Sonar 'approach' better than any other softwares at the moment, but being bled for £100 a year when the direction of travel seems to be further and further away from what I actually want for this DAW feels quite expensive. I'll see where my wallet is after xmas and may spring for the studio version then (to keep my hand in as much as anything). I'm most disappointed that it appears Mackie have dumped Tracktion as I think that would have been my first choice replacement (in fact if anything it takes what I like about the Sonar single window paradigm and improves on it, the idea of a left to right signal flow works so well on a computer monitor) Cheers, Child
|
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3922
- Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
- Location: Victoria, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/21 19:10:35
(permalink)
My current setup is temporary and makeshift, so it's not a good time for me to be upgrading any software just yet. Meanwhile, I am still happy enough with Sonar 7PE, which is not a bad version to be stuck with. It is very stable and has no serious bugs that I have noticed, apart from some quirkiness associated with envelopes. But I am watching the X1 forum with interest and may or may not decide to "upgrade" later. CW has now released a PDF manual for X1, but unfortunately has restricted its distribution to existing X1 users only. This is a shame, as I would welcome the opportunity to study it to get to know more about the nitty-gritty of X1, rather than relying on the forum.
SonarPlatinum∞(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1 Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc. Having fun at work lately
|
BluesMeister
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 581
- Joined: 2003/11/07 19:45:25
- Location: Downunderland
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/21 20:45:42
(permalink)
Kev999 CW has now released a PDF manual for X1, but unfortunately has restricted its distribution to existing X1 users only. That's fair enough, Kev999, Cakewalk don't want people with pirated software having access to the manual. Like you, I regularly follow the posts on the X1 forum, and currently I'm in no hurry to 'migrate' as Bitflipper so eloquently put it. I was perfectly happy with S5 and only went to S8 with the 'free upgrade to S8.5' offer, which is where I'm currently at. I may go to X1, but more likely I'll wait for X-next whatever nomenclature it has.
BluesMeister 5 guitars, 1 amplifier, 3 pedals Asus P8P67LE, i7 3.4GHz, 16GB DDR3 RAM, 1TB HDD Win7 Home Premium 64-Bit SP-1 Sonar 8.5.3 64-Bit, RME HDSPe AIO Spendor BC-1 Studio Monitors
|
Old Goat
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 62
- Joined: 2010/12/17 20:54:48
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/21 21:04:30
(permalink)
What bites for me is that I upgraded to 8.5 from HS6XL the week before X1 was announced. that might be kinda funny, except I upgraded to HS6XL the week before HS7 was announced. Can you say "born under a bad sign"? I just wanted to move up to 64 bit power and make my setup future-resistant as much as possible. *sigh* I shoulda just upgraded the computer and stayed with HS and CoolEdit. Not really, but the growing pains are giving me the blues....
|
southpaw3473
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 782
- Joined: 2008/04/22 16:50:41
- Location: Western MA
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/21 21:08:39
(permalink)
bitflipper My current plan is to wait for X2 and see if it signals a return to functional progress over cosmetic change for its own sake. Being an optimist, I really do think that's what will happen. I fully expect to be back onboard come next fall. Of course, in the meantime it's only prudent to look at other options. +1 As usual Bit has put it succinctly.
We'll not risk another frontal assault-that rabbit's dynamite!!! Tommy Byrnes Sonar Platinum Win 10 Pro x64 AMD FX 8350 Eight-Core 4.00GHz/ ASRock 970 Extreme4/ 16 gigs RAMUA Apollo Firewire/UA 2 Quad Satellite/ Focusrite OctoPre/Makie Onyx1220i Mixer THANK YOU!!!
|
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/22 01:41:11
(permalink)
Rothchild Yeah, despite the repeated mantra, to people who find X1 doesn't work to their satisfaction, that you 'don't have to upgrade' it does appear that 8.5.3 is abandonware. It's been taken out of the list of apps on the bug reporter (I've not tried the FR form yet but I guess it's the same). Child That's my feeling too and I will have a look at the other lines of daws that Cake has. But you have that overall fear that all lines of products will be end-of-line and grab X1 approach. I looked very close at Tracktion too, having the NFR-version 1.5 waiting for the 2.0 that never came and I went Cake instead. I saw that Tracktion 3 is bundled with all Mackie Hardware nowadays and have no idea how it developed, and if it's abandoned that's EOL too. My best alternative right now is that Samplitude 12 arrives, and it will be x64 too Magix has stated. If I like the takemanager compared to Sonar take management it will probably be my next. And they have good crossgrade alternatives from other daws.
|
PH68
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2007/07/24 17:09:34
- Location: England
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/22 02:41:19
(permalink)
Don't forget, even if you do change to X1. In about 12 months it too will be abandonded as soon as X2 (or whatever) comes out.
~ Cakewalk ~ Arturia ~ Waves ~ Overloud ~ Windows ~
|
Glyn Barnes
Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7564
- Joined: 2009/06/10 05:12:31
- Location: A Stone's Throw from the Line
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/22 06:39:25
(permalink)
Skyline_UK Interesting that Cakewalk have chosen to keep two separate forums for 8.5 and X1. I suggest they are fully aware that in attempting to make the leap to greater market share (in Europe particularly, hence the many visits by their gurus and PR folk) currently occupied by Cubase at al, they have to risk alienating users (such as myself) that originally chose Sonar because it WASN'T Cubase or Logic having tried their demos and found their GUIs obscure and impenetratable. I don't blame Cakewalk for making such a move in order to grow the business, but I think my long association with Sonar is now looking like it's at an end. John X1 is certainly getting good reviews. For me the trouble is they have made it look more like the DAWs I don't like (with, as you say a obscure and inpenatretratable GIUs). I will keep with 8.5 for the time being, I like to keep my software up to date but I cant' face the learning curve at the moment. I am wondering if I am becoming a luddite? However I do think its unrealistic to expect Cakewalk to continue development of older versions.
post edited by Glyn Barnes - 2010/12/22 06:44:31
|
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/22 10:18:47
(permalink)
Glyn Barnes However I do think its unrealistic to expect Cakewalk to continue development of older versions. When they changed the recipe on CocaCola and a lot of folks liked the old less sweet Coke better, they reintroduced the CocaCola Classic. Smart move for people very careful about the brand and marketposition. So why not keep both lines for different purposes, 8.x and Xx? Market/Users will tell what will survive! Cake has got a bunch of different products even in the daw sector. I tested a few before Sonar were the only one left.
|
Teksonik
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 521
- Joined: 2006/10/18 12:59:42
- Location: Las Vegas
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/22 10:47:33
(permalink)
X1 is different enough to call it a separate product. Both it and 8.5 should be developed and supported but Cakewalk can't even properly support one product let alone two. I have no desire to "migrate" (well put) to X1 since I see no benefit and will instead spend $60 less to purchase a Reaper 3 license. Forcing one to constantly pay for "upgrades" might generate income but will lose customers along the way. Sonar 8.5.3 is missing a feature that I really like in Reaper that will now never find it's way into 8.5 so there really is no choice but to move on....................Sorry CW but you'll get no more money from me.............
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Is it possible that there will be Sonar 8.x product that keep being developed?
2010/12/22 11:22:53
(permalink)
Sonar 8.5.3 is missing a feature that I really like in Reaper that will now never find it's way into 8.5 I've been following Reaper's progress over the years, and at the rate it's going it will definitely be a contender - eventually. In fact, if you're doing straight all-audio recording, it's there now. But if MIDI is in your vocabulary, Reaper still has a way to go. You'd continue to be frustrated by the "missing feature" syndrome, I'm afraid. Of course, the difference is that Reaper is still being actively developed, with new features being added at an incredible pace. But SONAR hasn't been abandoned. X1 is 8.5 with a shiny new body. Once the pain of birthing the new UI has passed, I'm certain they'll be back to adding substantive features again.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|