K-System

Author
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2685
  • Joined: 12/8/2012
  • Location: Montreal
  • Status: offline
December 28, 14 1:50 PM (permalink)

K-System

I've been reading up on Bob Katz's K-System :
   Level Practices (Part 1)
   Level Practices (Part 2) (Includes the K-System)
   http://www.aes.org/technical/documentDownloads.cfm?docID=65
 
Lots of threads in Cakewalk forums, here are two good ones : 
   Getting the K-system working in Sonar 8.5.2
   K-System - Do I have this right?
 
Reading through the posts, there is some debate over the best SPL to monitor at, some saying Katz's and the film industry's standard 83db and others arguing that this is too loud and preferring something around 76db.  I'm not sure if others noticed, but Katz himself says (in Part 2 above) that he monitors pop music at (an average of) 6db below the standard, which results in a monitor level of 77db.  So in reality everyone seems to agree (except maybe Jeff Evans, but then he admits to possibly being slightly deaf ).  I've noticed that the quality of my own hearing drops significantly right below 76-78db.  Not that I can't hear below that, but it requires more concentration and I lose the sparkle.  I also find 83-85 (average) too loud, so I'll be using 78.
 
Another thing, Katz complains about the loudness war, but I see the issue as more of a "where the music is played back" question.  Cheap earbuds, clock radios and listening in a car (or store/elevator) requires very little dynamic range or you lose the soft parts (especially in my car with studded winter tires).  How many people actually listen to pop music on a high end sound system in a good room ?  Hardly anyone I'd wager.  Katz proposes an interesting solution to the problem :  put the compression at the playback end of things.  This would be great.  With a compression knob on a radio, you could adjust the sound to suit the background noise.
 
I like the standardization aspect of the K-System and will be using it along with my newly acquired Klanghelm meters.  I calibrated my system yesterday evening.  I have a reasonably good sound system in a quiet house so I can go for the more rewarding high dynamic range for my own music.
 
Tracking
Katz mentions tracking very briefly in only one sentence, saying that a peak meter is "probably sufficient".  I'd like to hear a bit more about this end of the production sequence.  The K-system covers everything from the moment you have something on a track through to playback, but it doesn't say what the level should be for the track itself.  When recording, what level do you guys aim for at the individual track level ?
 
Calibrated monitor level control
This item is recommended, but no one seems to make one (Katz made his own).  Would just a large pair of large, labeled audio sliders or rotary pots in a box between the audio interface and the (powered) monitors do the trick ?
 
Headphones
How do you calibrate SPL with headphones ?  I'm guessing you can't !
 
 
 
 
 
  

Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
#1

9 Replies Related Threads

    gswitz
    Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5694
    • Joined: 6/16/2007
    • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 28, 14 3:04 PM (permalink)
    Most of the stuff I mix gets listened to by a relatively small population and I know how they will listen. Some of my friends have great gear, and for them I mix for that. Others have cheap geat, and then I mix for that. I try to make sure it will sound ok on either cheap or great, but I target whatever I think the main listening environment and volume may be.

    StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
    I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
    #2
    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 11/7/2003
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 28, 14 3:49 PM (permalink)
    FWIW, iTunes has an option called Sound Check, which automatically detects songs volume and adjust them to the same level. I've read that similar mechanisms exist in streaming.
     
    End result - over-compressed songs will sound like crap, and actually quieter, not just on radio, but on the customers' end. I say: yay! :)
     

    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #3
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 28, 14 4:00 PM (permalink)
    I actually monitor over a range of SPL levels. The reason why I like 85 dB is because my space is quite big and I feel it is a nice volume to work at over the long haul.  But yes I dont mind working at 80 dB and even lower at times especially when checking mixes on my small mono Auratone type speaker.  I also do some heavy hitting at 95 dB and 105 dB SPL for short periods.  I find it reveals things like the bass low end and the reverbs tend to show themselves up loud a bit too.
     
    K system is NOT just about SPL monitoring levels, it requires you to monitor rms or VU levels right through your system as well.  Although tracking does not require it per se I see no reason why tracking levels cannot be set using the VU meter as well.  So I track everything at the ref level right at the start.  I find then it easy to get balances right on a buss and then the buss ends up at the ref level and also the final mix too.
     
    I work at K -14 a lot for more general things and K-20 in situations where I want more headroom.  So when I do this I recal my VU meters and turn the monitor level up so it is back to 85 dB SPL.
     
    They say 85 dB is where the ear is the most flat (if you could call it that)  It is lovely volume for sure.  Pink noise at 85 dB will sound quite louder than music at the same level so be aware of that too.
     
    Loudness wars are about something else.  You need to get into Loudness meters and also Dynamic Range meters too.  But before you master if you work with the K system you are well on the way to a nice punchy and dynamic master before you even start.
     
    The Klanghelm meters are excellent and also they have the closest ballistics to the real deal which is what I also have too.

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #4
    Paul P
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2685
    • Joined: 12/8/2012
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 28, 14 4:51 PM (permalink)
    Jeff, I've read an awful lot from you and others on this subject and appreciate your having taken the time over the years to explain it to us.  So if I select K-14, say, I should aim to record whatever I'm recording so that a VU meter (set to -14db) on the track during recording hovers around zero ?
     
    A standard VU meter has rise and fall times of 300ms but Katz specifies 600ms for his K-System meters (Appendix 3 of Part 2 above).  Should I set my Klanghelm meters to 600ms ?
     
    The meters are pretty hypnotizing.  I imported some Juno Reactor pieces to play around with and see they're mastered to around -8db on the VU meters, sometimes close to -10db (peaks at 0).  I've always appreciated the dynamics of this music, and have to turn it up if it's mixed in with other songs (I listen to this kind of stuff while running).

    Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
    #5
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 28, 14 5:04 PM (permalink)
    That is it exactly. Set your incoming levels so that the VU just reaches up to and hovers around the 0 dB VU mark.  With very transient sounds such as drums etc the VU meters are less help because they respond more slowly.  In these situations use your peak metering.  That is what it is there for.  But by the time you start sending say 8 drum sounds to a drum buss the VU will work OK over the buss because there is usually enough rms component in the signal to move the meter nicely.
     
    I have created some special test tones to test the ballistics of a VU meter. eg how the meter dances to the music.  I have very nice real ones and over time I have set the Klanghelm meters to get very close to the movement of the real ones.  I will need to check my settings again but I will let you know what they are.  I prefer to match te ballistics rather than use Bob's 600ms time.
     
    For me I prefer the VU VST's to move as close as possible to the real meters.  The ballistics of the meter will tell you tons about the signal it is monitoring.  After a while you become very expert at observing them.  (Note VU meters that use a bar graph display are NOT as good in this mode either)  You can even set compressors right once you understand the movement of the VU needle.  Really well mastered material makes them move a certain way too.  If the meter swings wildly it means there is something wrong.  (often it is unwanted subsonic material that is making the meter swing wildly so you track it down and sort it out)
     
     
     
     

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #6
    Paul P
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2685
    • Joined: 12/8/2012
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 28, 14 11:54 PM (permalink)
    I've done some more research on the "calibrated monitor level control".  Searching on "Passive Volume Control" reveals dozens of models though I haven't yet seen one that claims 1 db increments.  Most are boutique audio stuff with prices and lore to match.
     
    Here's a DIY article for a volume control with no calibration.  It's a simple design, a pot and four resistors, but it uses up 6 db of signal if that matters.  Not sure how accurate/reproducible it would be,  but I can see the use of having a big knob nearby.  The SOS article mentioned by dmbaer in another thread shows what is probably a commercial version of the same sort of thing for 60$.  I guess there's no getting around having to recalibrate the monitor SPL often.

    The previous site also has an article for building a pair of real VU meters (and more articles that seem quite down to earth).


    Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
    #7
    gswitz
    Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5694
    • Joined: 6/16/2007
    • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 29, 14 8:09 AM (permalink)
    Paul,
     
    I know I'm a hobbyist and probably under-qualified to contribute here, but I can't resist.
     
    I use RME's digicheck all the time on the output master bus. It has a 'start' button on it and measures the average loudness (ITU 1770/EBU R128)...
    http://www.rme-audio.de/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13925
     
    I measure the main output bus with this. It has targets for 12, 14 and 20 for the K-System.As I mix, I target 0 and balance compression and limiting so that I fall right at 0 with only a touch of limiting (maybe a dB or so).
     
    I have a kid in the house, so I mix with headphones sometimes and with monitors at other times. I always end up checking the mix using ear-buds with my phone and in my car on the highway (monitoring a mix with a good amount of white-noise is recommended by Craig Anderton and others).
     
    I did go through all the work of measuring every single track's average loudness and setting them all to be roughly the same, but this goes wrong when you have one instrument much louder than the others and bleeding into the other mics. Then, when you bring up the clarinet, you are also bringing up the overloud(tm) electric guitar.
     
    So, after going through the effort of setting all the tracks to the same level, I'd have to double back and fix it by ear.
     
    Now, a couple of years down the road, I still sometimes start by measuring loudness and adjusting things. It doesn't hurt as a jumping off place, but after I've mixed 1 or 2 of the songs from the night's concert, I'm usually ignoring those meters.
     
    I do keep an eye on the meter on the main output through the mixing process. I tend to make all the songs around the same volume. (14) except choirs (20). On occasion, I listen to some post from the forum or a link from a friend and switch my meter to 12 as I listen. Once, I forgot to change it back and I was like, What is going on?? as I pushed all my levels through the roof. This is to say, I really never use 12 personally.
     
    The sound coming from the stereo tends to fall at my personal comfort levels. I adjust it around different playback volumes. It's always interesting to hear the volume my wife sets it too when she's talking to my daughter in the backseat. Wow, all I can hear is the snare!! or some other thing.
     
    Songs are pretty short compared to movies. It's relatively easy to just measure the average loudness on the mains and bag it on all the individual tracks. As Jeff points out, average loudness on a tom track is kinda pointless, so then you're looking at the average loudness across all the drums. Me, I tweak the drums a lot. Consider a track that suddenly has a lot of rim work b/c it's a quiet song... how do you want to do that one? Do you want the song to be a dB softer on the CD?
     
    I do find that most of my fine adjustments are in the range of 1dB. Increasing the bass 1dB while maintaining the same average loudness means reducing the level of all other things ever so slightly and the overall impact is pretty dramatic at a healthy volume.
     
    When it comes to setting levels for tracking, I tend to use RME's auto-level feature. This takes the human pretty much out of the equation. It keeps peaks closer to -14 than -20 (and adjusts gain when peaks come within -6). When I manually set gains, I make sure I don't clip, but I don't bother measuring them with the DigiCheck EBU Meters. I could but why bother?
     
    What's the point?
    I just wanted to share what I learned experimenting with the K-System. I don't really take it too seriously. I do make a good effort to make good mixes and I did learn a lot measuring average loudness at different points in the chain. In the end, an average loudness meter on the master out does the trick for me. It measures crest factor and average loudness and helps guide my compression and limiting (which I then adjust track levels around as I mix). I kinda think of mixing with the track faders to compression to limiting as bottom up mixing, and using the EBU meter down to limiting down to compression down to faders as top down mixing.
     
    **After thought: I also always have the RME DigiCheck Totalizer on the the master bus. This has a vector scope and spectral analyzer in one window. I use workspaces to make it easy to open both to match the sample-rate of my project. 
     

    StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
    I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
    #8
    Paul P
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2685
    • Joined: 12/8/2012
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 29, 14 2:08 PM (permalink)
    Thanks gswitz for taking the time to write this up.  It's nice to get an overall view.  I can see that once you're into the groove of things, you don't need to be checking everything all the time.  You can just tell if it's ok or not.  For my level of non-experience, it's very enlightening to 'see' what is going on at each stage and how the various parts affect each other.  I'm still very much at the "setting up Sonar to eventually do something useful with it" stage and it's nice to put some good practices in place before I make a mess of things.
     
    It looks like the K-system is geared towards having people do things in a similar way to aid reproducibility and interchange, either of concepts or recorded material, between people.  I'll certainly not be part of any music producing network in any foreseeable future, but standards usually reflect a certain average of good practices and I see them as a good place to start.  I've learned a lot these last few days.
     
    I just noticed in the SOS article and another place the recommendation to have the monitor output from the audio interface always set to maximum and adjust the actual monitor SPL with its input level control.  Is this standard practice?  It explains why the signal loss from inserting an independent level control between the interface and the monitors is not seen as a problem.  I've always avoided maximum settings on anything.

    Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
    #9
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: K-System December 29, 14 3:23 PM (permalink)
    I think you can over complicate matters doing Loudness measurements during a production.  I don't bother with any of that at all until I am in the mastering phase.  So measuring Loudness on individual tracks or buses is a bit of a waste of time.  It won't tell you much. eg a track may be very loud but end up very soft in the mix so what is the point of monitoring its loudness way back there.  It is still very easy to get all your tracks sitting at the same rms level with a VU meter.  (the VU meter will cover about 90% of the work required!)
     
    I work using the K system all the way through a production maintaining correct rms or VU levels on tracks buses and final mix.  eg If I am doing a project at K -14 then I ensure all those areas are at K -14.  I have found that the Loudness measurements often are very close to the K system ref levels.  So if I produce a mix which is sitting at K -14 then the Loudness figure is often very close to that eg -15 LU etc.  (Assuming of course the track is a reasonably consistent level over the course of the track) Loudness meters are measuring over the whole time of the track.
     
    Once a track is premastered around a K ref level then I go into mastering mode and then I involve Loudness and Dynamic Range metering as well as rms metering.  (All 3 are very important!)
     
    Monitor controllers are fine and all but also not really necessary either.  The purpose of a monitor controller is to ensure exact SPL levels in the room.  (Without an SPL meter present and also offer very high audio signal path quality to your monitors but for most purposes we dont need that level of quality) That can be achieved easily having an SPL meter permanently set up in a good spot.  That will do the same thing overall.  I just check the meter all the time to ensure I am in the 85 dB SPL ballpark.
     
    What I find more interesting is how often I look down at the meter after say 4 or 5 hours or so and notice it is telling me 90 or even 95 dB. ie the SPL level has just crept up over time!  That is far more relevant.  Then I take a break for a while and reset the SPL level in the room back to 85 dB or so.

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #10
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1