http://www.bakerprotools.com/default.asp

Jose7822

DJSur


http://www.bakerprotools.com/default.asp

 
 
You gotta be kidding me, LMAO!
 
 

That's the first thing I clicked on when I googled. I LMAO too! lol

UnderTow


It is actually general programming slang. Code bakers are programmers.

i'm in the profession and that's incorrect. it's a reference to the cake in cakewalk.

re: Code Baking

Here is an article about Bitbake, a cross compiler:

http://www.linux-magazine...Beagleblog/Baking-Bits

I don't know if it the software works etc... but I do know that if I find 2 more examples of baking used in print in this manner the Oxford English Dictionary is going to back up Mr Undertows assertions about that this use of the word exists within the English language . ;-)

I have enjoyed the term bakers being used to describe the Cakewalk team because it has, to my mind, seemed like a clever double entendre.

The attack the messenger game is getting old up here... I promised to be nice this week... so that is all I have to say.




edit spelling

Here's an article written in Canadian. I guess the Oxford English Dictionary accepts stuff from the common wealth. :-)

It refers to "Shake and Bake" and has a nifty flow chart with the "Shake and Bake" process featured in Red ink.

http://www.microarch.org/micro34/talks/wilson.pdf

That is 3 examples... which is usually enough to establish that any particular use of a word will be recognized by the ultimate authority on the English language... the OED.


best regards,
mike

guitardog247


I don't understand why you keep calling them bakers, do you know if they smoke pot?

No.... It's a nickname from the early days of 12 Tones music and it refers to those who Bake The Cake...

Inek

Notecrusher


@mike i have no idea if you think you're being witty or clever or whatever, but in any case, "bakers" is not slang for programmers.

Because you haven't heard of it it is fact?

Here a couple more references to baking code:

http://www.codechef.com/CB109/
http://www.elance.com/s/djenniex   (This guy even calls himself an "Expert Code Baker").

UnderTow

Why limit ourselves to the technology we had three decades ago?

Yer man from SSL makes a good point there, but it's arguably a slightly hypocritical one, given that SSL's entire Duende product range (and XLogic to a lesser extent) is about emulating their own console strip and buss effects from three decades ago.

YAY! More gassing vids to make me hope it's the 8th already

Tried the channel strip today , first contact : impressed !!
My friend (uad owner) : damn now i wonder why keeping my uad !!!!! he doesn't have a lot of uad plugs but he got the neve cs !!

I kinda stressed because the new window stuff everytime i moved some it go here and here ...ect ....

HD screen a must !!

The new smart tool is great , disturbing first then great !!
i spend 10 minutes findind the auto quantize witch is placed in the CS !!
Been with some friends : verdict all future x1 owners!!

Cons: on small resolution , no cs scrool to see it all on the track inspector view....
also no mouse scroll support (for the channel strip) .....defenitly some to do !!

big channel layout on the consol , small pan knob and track name display size because of the number of the track ....weird ...

been able also to change some color ....but you have to relaunch the apps to take effects.....not good at this point (still beta)

Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk
]

Two points to make ...

1. Calling our coders Bakers is totally acceptable and has nothing to do with smoking, although we understand that reference.

I've use that word 'Bakers' quite a lot on these forums, I never intended 'Bakers' to be offensive, I think that word is a really cool way to describe Cakewalk's developers (coders)!

Also, I have a gut feeling the Bakers have baked (X1) the finest Cake ever baked :)








Oh Yeah man, it's smoking!!



-

John T

Why limit ourselves to the technology we had three decades ago?

Yer man from SSL makes a good point there, but it's arguably a slightly hypocritical one, given that SSL's entire Duende product range (and XLogic to a lesser extent) is about emulating their own console strip and buss effects from three decades ago.

Paul Frindle hasn't worked for SSL in a very long time. He went on to , amongst other things, work for Sony as part of the team that created the Sony Oxford digital console and later the Oxford plugin range. He is now half of Pro Audio DSP: http://www.proaudiodsp.com/about/

I think you will find that Paul is very much into new technology and ground breaking designs rather than emulations of older technology. No hypocrisy there.

UnderTow

Razorwit

studiofreak

This is true.  But as far as I can tell, Heat is HD only. 

I would really love to know how the new pro channel compares to its modeling counterparts like UA and Waves?

I'm thinking about doing a quick test using the new Pro-channel in 1176 mode vs the UAD-2 1176 plug vs a real 1176.  Ditto for the SSL comp mode and my real SSL bus comp.  Not sure when I'll get to it but I'll post results if anyone is interested.


Dean

hello,
i pulled this thread out from a search and was really hoping to find the post with the a/b/c comparisons. unfortunately, the thread is a cliff hanger...

 i am especially curious to know this since the release of the t-racks 1176-type plugin.
any chance of anyone following this up? i bet a lot of people on the forum would dig it.
thanks.

edit:
or maybe this has already been done in another thread?
if so, i couldn't find it.
thanks again.

subtlearts


But I'm likely more interested in the IK 'white' model (LA2A)... 

I'll back you on that one. And also the RND Portico plugs... if the damn things ever get released. "Available soon" my arse...

M@ B

Razorwit

studiofreak

This is true.  But as far as I can tell, Heat is HD only. 

I would really love to know how the new pro channel compares to its modeling counterparts like UA and Waves?

I'm thinking about doing a quick test using the new Pro-channel in 1176 mode vs the UAD-2 1176 plug vs a real 1176.  Ditto for the SSL comp mode and my real SSL bus comp.  Not sure when I'll get to it but I'll post results if anyone is interested.


Dean

hello,
i pulled this thread out from a search and was really hoping to find the post with the a/b/c comparisons. unfortunately, the thread is a cliff hanger...

i am especially curious to know this since the release of the t-racks 1176-type plugin.
any chance of anyone following this up? i bet a lot of people on the forum would dig it.
thanks.

edit:
or maybe this has already been done in another thread?
if so, i couldn't find it.
thanks again.

Hi M@B
I threw together a quick comparison for you.
Quick drum loop, dry and then compressed using PC76, UAD1176, IK Black 76 and a hardware 1176.  All have peak volumes within .2db of one another to try and avoid Fletcher-Munson problems.  I tried to have all the compressors show about 4 db of deflection on the VU's, but to try and keep somewhat consistant sounds the hardware and IK unit had to have a bit more and the ProChannel less (the ProChannel feels MUCH more sensitive...4db of compresson on the PC seems like a lot more compression than the others).
 
Just for fun I also was playing with A/B'ing tube saturation last night on a kick drum.  I used both the type I and type II ProChannel emulations and then a chameleon labs 7802 for an example of a real tube.  I didn't pay as close attention last night to levels, so you probably want to adjust them yourself before doing an A/B.
 
1176 samples here: 1176
Tube samples here: tube
 
Dean