• Hardware
  • Motu Z-Box - Recording Guitar Directly to interface?
2015/02/26 08:31:33
mikebeam
I learned a lot from a forum about TH2 - here: http://forum.cakewalk.com/Overloud-TH2-Producer-vs-TH2-Regular-m3167826.aspx
 
Have some follow up questions about the Motu Z-Box.  I've been plugging in my guitar directly to the interface, but I'm not terribly impressed with the sound.  I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the Motu Z-Box since it boasts to "give back your tone".  I've read mixed reviews, but one of them talked about the impendance of the interface... 
 
Don't really know what that is - I'm using an M-Audio Quad.  Do you think the Motu Z-Box will provide any boost to sound quality?  Is it just a passive DI box?  Are there other hardware suggestions people could give to improve guitar recording?
 
 
2015/02/26 11:00:57
pentimentosound
SOS's review of it.
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/sep10/articles/motu-zbox.htm
Fender and other vendors have guitar input devices, too, if your I/O doesn't have an instrument input with very high impedance.
2015/02/26 11:44:17
mikebeam
I read that article and almost just went ahead and bought it.  I read somewhere else that, depending on the interface's impendence - it could not make a difference.  
 
This review said this - "Measuring the input impedance of the ZBox while it's disconnected from the audio interface shows the high-impedance input to be in the order of 300kΩ and the low-impedance one about half that."
 
My interface is an M-Audio M-Track Quad.  The specs from user manual say that the Guitar Impendence is 100k ohms.  
 
Soooo....  I don't really understand a lot of this, but from the sounds of it - this is probably a decent purchase for me.  What do you think?
2015/02/26 12:26:04
Beepster
Supposedly the capacitor they use mimics the capacitor in the preamp section of Fender amps (which are obviously quite clean and crisp). So although the impedence may be the same the actual electronics may still make a difference.
 
I have a Focusrite which has a very nice Inst in (which you heard in those tunes I posted) BUT I may still get some extra sauce out of the Z-Box and for $60 I figure it's worth it. Also it would allow me to plug straight into my Mackie mixing board as well which would be very nice for the extra routing, level control and EQ.
 
Now you will have to take the following statement with a grain of salt because I simply do not know nor have I used your interface... but I do not think M-Audio really has the greatest Inst/Hi-Z inputs. That's based on reviews and I have tried M-Audio devices in the past but that was a long time ago and only briefly. I nearly bought an M-Audio but decided on the Focusrite Scarlett because of all the amazing reviews and I love the thing.
 
Still the Hi-Z isn't QUITE how I'd like it which is why I am constantly coming up with elaborate schemes in regards to my guitar/bass input.
 
If you haven't already do a youtube search for Motu Z-Box unboxing. It should bring up a rather well done video of a guy doing some pretty intensive tests on it. He does a sound comparison (which is kind of hard to tell the difference because it's youtube sound) and runs it through a fancy frequency analyzer so you can SEE what the Z-Box is doing. The analyzer shows a lot more complexity in the Z-Box signal.
 
That said there are other options. There are some DI box manufacturers that have whole lines of devices for guitar and bass that are tuned for specific instruments/applications. I forget their names at the moment but maybe I'll dig out some links later. That stuff is more expensive though.
 
Thing is you may not notice a HUGE difference with any of these devices. It's all very subtle but those subtleties can mean a lot to a sim and overall mix. It means less tweaking and notch EQing.
 
The other thing to know is those Inst. ins are kind of designed to take various inputs other than guitar such as keyboards (or so I've read) whereas the Z-Box and other dedicated DI devices are specifically for guitar.
 
You should also check out Craig Anderton's various articles about using guitar sims. If you google "Anderton SOS Guitar Sim" you should find a really good article about making DI guitar signals work a lot better with sims. I use those tricks all the time... particularly notching out the "fizzy/crackly" sound with and EQ. Those tricks are meant to circumvent the problems the Z-Box claims to solve.
 
Cheers.
2015/02/26 12:41:15
mikebeam
Yes, I watched that video.  It was hard to really tell, but I could tell it was doing something.  If I could go back, I would probably buy the Focusrite for an audio interface too.  I actually have a Mackie BlackJack that I might go back to, but I bought this because I needed 4 inputs for a specific project and it worked great.  Never had any reason to switch back to the blackjack.  Overall, I think it's probably higher quality than most other M-Audio products, but I haven't done sound comparisons.  Functionally, it's been rock solid - never updated drivers, plug n play, always works as expected.  At some point, I'll get around to doing a sound comparison.  
 
I'm going to buy the ZBox - I'll report back in a few days!  
 
Thanks to both of you for your help!  On both threads!
2015/02/26 12:58:36
mettelus
When intending to (or potentially might) use an amp sim, Melodyne (Melodyne can fall apart when trying to process a signal with harmonics already existing), or external send for re-amping it is best to actually record a clean guitar signal with the best S/N ratio you can get initially. You may be able to achieve this from your interface alone (would need to test), as you can record a track and then normalize it before then doing any of the above.
 
The advantages of an active DI box are to boost the signal for recording where the interface doesn't cut it as well as allowing for very low monitoring when tracking by also splitting the output giving you the flexibility of using a real amp to monitor while tracking that signal (which you can also record with a microphone if desired). To achieve these best, mute both the clean/microphone tracks while recording and simply listen to the amp while tracking.
 
The "purpose" of a DI box (for signal boosting) can also be achieved via any powered external pedal/processor which can boost the clean signal (which you may already have), but the routing of a DI box (two signals, one clean for recording, one colored for monitoring) may not be readily achievable.
 
As far as tone... the purpose of recording a clean signal is you can use EQs both pre/post processing (via amp sim or external re-amping) to color that tone to your heart's content. It is often easier to take away than add, so I always shoot for the best clean S/N ratio of the full signal on the recording and let the amp sim do the rest post-production. The biggest advantage of an amp-sim or reamping is you can change your mind down the road without having to re-record anything. Amp sims are the easiest to work with, and a post-EQ LPF in the 4K-7K range seems to have the biggest bang-for-the-buck to harness harmonics created which an amp itself would not.
 
I just wanted to throw this out, since an active DI box is intended to boost the clean signal, not "color the tone," per se. As long as you get a good S/N ratio, you also have the possibility of normalizing a recorded track and gating the normalized track to remove the boosted noise in most cases. Active DI boxes do have advantages in signal boosting and monitoring options while tracking.
 
With all that said, I looked into an active DI box in the past, but realized 1) I already had a processor to do what I wanted, and 2) didn't need the processor since my interface alone can achieve proper signal gain with low enough latency to monitor via amps sims once I streamlined my tracking process.
 
2015/02/26 13:48:40
pentimentosound
I have learned to work with the guitar signal DI'd through my Tascam us1641, Rolls ADB2 (active) DI, and passive DI's. Lots of gear comes with a DI or line out.
    There is a huge range of DI type units from say Behringer-Whirlwind, up to Radial/Countryman, and all the wayup to the new NEVE one for like $269, or the big Radial JD7 ($1100!).
     If you only have one guitar, then one DI will "work", once you learn how it affects your tone. If/when you have as assortment of guitars, basses, baritones etc et al, then consider getting an active DI, a passive one with a transformer, and/or the preamp type(s) with DI/line outs. I like to track through a DI box splitting it into a pedal and an amp (which has a line out), and then mic the speaker, too. It's fun and always interesting to pick and choose, for each song or part.
   Bass has long been recorded that way, splitting the DI for clean and then taking the DI's "through" into an amp.
 
2015/02/26 13:54:10
pentimentosound
I think Beepster is referring to this SOS Anderton article
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul13/articles/sonar-notes-0713.htm
 
and this one on Bass is good, too
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct08/articles/sonarworkshop_1008.htm
2015/02/26 14:44:02
Beepster
pentimentosound
I think Beepster is referring to this SOS Anderton article
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul13/articles/sonar-notes-0713.htm
 
and this one on Bass is good, too
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct08/articles/sonarworkshop_1008.htm




I was actually thinking of this older one from back when sims were a lot less realistic and needed a lot more tweaking. The techniques are still quite useful and relevant... just not quite as necessary.
 
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul11/articles/sonar-tech-0711.htm
 
Thanks for those other links though. I hadn't read those yet. The bass one in particular because I still kind of struggle to get my bass sounding right without screwing up my mixes.
 
Cheers.
2015/02/26 15:03:06
Beepster
And maybe this thread I posted last fall will be of interest here...
 
http://forum.cakewalk.com/SOLVED-Recording-from-a-Mixer-into-the-DAW-Direct-Outs-vs-Aux-sends-m3075268.aspx
 
I was asking about mixer stuff but the convo veered off into DI stuff which is when Rain pointed out the Z-Box (first I'd heard of it). Lots of really heavy hitters chimed in on that thread including Danny who talks about his mixer with onboard instrument/hi-z inputs he plugs straight into. Very very educational and got me looking at a lot of things that I am now actually doing as I record even thoug my gear is limited.
 
Also check out some of the stuff Radial puts out for DIing guits and other stuff. Unfortunately their site isn't as well laid out as it used to be (used to have simple charts... now it's all wacky)...
 
http://www.radialeng.com/index.php#
 
I'd love to snag some of that stuff.
12
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account