tenfoot
I am an avid facebook user. As a marketing tool it is excellent. As a support medium it is extraordinarily limited and serves more to give the impression of support via occasional, non searchable random responses than actual useful archived problem solving. In this regard the forum is far superior.
...
Regardless, from a support POV, the previously mentioned limitations still apply. A question answered on facebook is useful once, to one person. It is hard to see how Cakewalk's effort spent there is more valuable or useful than increased forum participation.
Brian WaltonFacebook certainly isn't an idea platform to address customer issues. I'd argue from what I've seen of the platform it is pretty terrible for that kind of support.
It is a pretty limited platform for support. I don't think you'd find someone at Cakewalk that would disagree.
The reality is we still get direct messages from customers on it and those need to be addressed. We quickly try to move people into our standard support system, sometimes logging internally on a customers behalf. This way there's a bit of accountability and less platform noise.
I know there were concerns of us stretching our support too thin, but we try to organize these social channels as a funnel.
Brian WaltonCurious where the pool of customer interviews came from.
Internal analytics and
we asked around.
Brian WaltonI don't use Facebook, but perhaps take it a level up...you have to have an email to use any platform. Cakewalk has an email for all users (also a requirement). So any broad communication could come via email to hit all users in some way.
E-mails aren't fallible. A user could use a junk e-mail they never check or a typo. ISP's can also false flag messages as SPAM and other users opt out of communication from Cakewalk.
We e-mailed a lot of SONAR users originally in regards to this thread and people
still didn't receive it.
tenfootAs to user groups that are more active than the forum, it would be great if you could posts links to these pages! A quick search reveals only pages with at best a few posts a day.
That's why I said arguably ;) It's a bit of a quality vs quantity thing and post counts don't always tell the whole story. There's a lot of positive sub-discussion and exchanges that take place. Even if there is a difference of opinion. Something that the level of anonymity of our forums can sometimes get in the way of. These groups are also entirely user run, so while a Cakewalk person may chime in on occasion it's not 'our show'.
The Cakewalk SONAR User Group (CSUG) is pretty active. They have 1961 members. There's some overlap with prominent forum users here. It's been growing pretty steadily too with 29 new members in the last day or so.