Helpful ReplyMixCraft may as well be Sonar.

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
Ken Matson
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 35
  • Joined: 2015/12/15 09:29:00
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 02:34:20 (permalink)
I'm afraid that if that line of fault were valid, we wouldn't be having this conversation right now!
#31
JonD
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2003/12/09 11:09:10
  • Location: East of Santa Monica
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 02:55:18 (permalink)
Mixcraft is still a bit behind in MIDI, for example no way to do a gradual (smooth) tempo change.  Or no Event viewer if you need to get into nitty-gritty of MIDI.  Plus the GUI needs some "refinement".
 
Still, I would happily recommend it to the hobbyist who doesn't need all the bloat/power features you see in sPlat and Cubase Pro.

SonarPlat/CWbBL, Win 10 Pro, i7 2600K, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB DDR3, Radeon HD5450, TC Electronic Impact Twin, Kawai MP11 Piano, Event ALP Monitors, Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro, Too Many Plugins, My lucky hat.
#32
soens
Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5154
  • Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
  • Location: Location: Location
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 08:41:42 (permalink)
Trying it out tonight. So far it's pretty slick but not sure if I can beat the Sunday night $99 deal deadline.
 
Someone said the GUI was kinda cartoonish. Nicely, all the GUI files are in a folder (mixrez) and can be repainted like Sonar's. So custom themes can be made for it.
 
Has Multidock style views. Big + is the Docked views can be displayed on a separate monitor.
 
Clips have their own play, mute, loop buttons. Very handy for editing.
 
MIDI editing is probably not up to Sonar but I haven't got that far yet.
 
Has cool MIDI Learn button for setting up your controller. Just did mine (transport only controller) and couldn't have been easier. The missing Stop button means I have to use the controller's Play button for Play & Pause. No RTZ button either.
 
A CON is the Time Ruler only displays Beats or Time, not both. Worse yet it affects both the Ruler and the Now Time. I like to have them showing opposite stats.
 
Only glitch I'm noticing so far is the softsynths tend to freeze up while playing them with the QWERTY keys.
When played with a controller the latency is very noticeable. Haven't seen how to adjust that if you can.
#33
soens
Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5154
  • Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
  • Location: Location: Location
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 09:30:20 (permalink)
Sweetwater sale just ended @midnight. Went to JRRSHOP and got it for $84.15. $99 - $14.85. MF still had it for $99 when bought it.
 
Waiting for manually generated download license. 14 days left on demo so no hurry.
#34
Mully
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1545
  • Joined: 2004/09/15 02:08:05
  • Location: Adelaide, Oztralia
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 10:05:01 (permalink)
Interesting....about to check it out. Thanks Flip and all for the heads up on this option...missed the $99 option though 

ASUS H270, i7-7700, JLM BA & 1290, LA2A Opto4, loads of guff.
#35
subtlearts
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2200
  • Joined: 2006/01/10 05:59:21
  • Location: Berlin
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 12:11:09 (permalink)
Ken Matson
I know a lot of people are attracted by the claims of a small, software-only company, but to me that's very scary now after what just happened. I want something backed by some deeper pockets who don't have all their eggs in one basket.


You mean, you'd be happier if they were backed by a big established company like say, Gibson? 🤤

tobias tinker 
music is easy: just start with complete silence, and take away the parts you don't like!
tobiastinker.com
aeosrecords.com
soundfascination.com
Sonar Platinum, a bunch of other stuff...
#36
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 15:48:05 (permalink)
I don't know if this is the proper place, but the drivers page is kinda confusing w/ Core and ASIO, soens.  The ASIO didn't have anything in its slot so I was working w/ Core at first, but the latency was 20 ms.  When I finally hit the blank drop down menu on ASIO all my interface drivers were available.  And I don't know how good the latency read out is (roundtrip?), but SONAR's 8 ms with my TASCAM UH-7000 dropped to 1.5 ms in Mixcraft.  And there was no noticeable delay with soft synths.  Sometimes, learning a new DAW is fun.
#37
BENT
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 355
  • Joined: 2013/03/25 05:40:49
  • Location: Somewhere over the Multiverse... la la la
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 21:15:52 (permalink)
Happy with Mixcraft... for now at least

I have empirical evidence this is true... (Bender told me!) 
Cakewalk by BandLab, Splat and other DAW's
PC = Win 10 64 Bit, i7 3770, 16Gb RAM, 256GB Samsung 2.5’ 840 PRO SATA6GB/s SSD 1, and 2 x 2Tb Internal, 
Monitors = 2 24” Samsung SA450 and 1 20” Dele
Edirol = Octa-Capture-UA1010, Quad-Capture-UA55, PCR-500,
Berringer 2 x FBC 1010 Alesis Control Pad KRK monitors
#38
TPayton
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 178
  • Joined: 2014/09/26 11:23:12
  • Location: Indiana
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 22:01:41 (permalink)
subtlearts
Ken Matson
I know a lot of people are attracted by the claims of a small, software-only company, but to me that's very scary now after what just happened. I want something backed by some deeper pockets who don't have all their eggs in one basket.

 


You mean, you'd be happier if they were backed by a big established company like say, Gibson? 🤤

 
Or perhaps Phillips?

AT
I don't know if this is the proper place, but the drivers page is kinda confusing w/ Core and ASIO, soens.  The ASIO didn't have anything in its slot so I was working w/ Core at first, but the latency was 20 ms.  When I finally hit the blank drop down menu on ASIO all my interface drivers were available.  And I don't know how good the latency read out is (roundtrip?), but SONAR's 8 ms with my TASCAM UH-7000 dropped to 1.5 ms in Mixcraft.  And there was no noticeable delay with soft synths.  Sometimes, learning a new DAW is fun.



I have better latency figures on my Scarlett 18i20 with Mixcraft.

Tom
#39
TPayton
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 178
  • Joined: 2014/09/26 11:23:12
  • Location: Indiana
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 22:06:05 (permalink)
Ken Matson
bitflipper
I, too, was quite impressed by Mixcraft. In my mind, it had been a dumbed-down DAW for singer-songwriters. But that was based on a long-ago quick look, now outdated. So many great features now. I feel like I could slip into it effortlessly, probably more so than any other DAW.
 
Having an Android app for remote transport control is a plus, since I've yet to replace my beloved Tranzport that died with Windows 7. Presonus has an app, too, but only for iOS. I'm not going to by an iPad for that.
 
Don't know about video, though.


My tranZport works fine with Windows 10 and sonar. It is also working with Studio One now. Just FYI. Also the studio one remote app works pretty good although it's awful tiny on my phone.



My Frontier Design Tranzport works just fine in Mixcraft. (and W10) In fact, Acoustica specifically mentions support for it in Mixcraft 8. 

Tom
#40
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 22:45:56 (permalink)
Better latency than 1.5 ms?  That is pretty fast.
#41
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/27 23:58:11 (permalink)
TPayton

My Frontier Design Tranzport works just fine in Mixcraft. (and W10) In fact, Acoustica specifically mentions support for it in Mixcraft 8. 




Now that is good news! But I didn't think it was ever a DAW issue, rather a Win10 problem. When I first went to 10 I was told by some folks, e.g. fireberd, that it was working for them. Alas, I was never able to cajole or threaten it into compliance. Might have to give it another go.
 
Not today, though. Today I am enjoying my new 34" widescreen monitor that just arrived. Woo hoo! Nearly three-foot wide track views! Still waiting for the dual monitor arm that'll let me mount the old twin 22" monitors above it. Gonna be awesome. If I position it just right, I'll be able to put lyrics up on one of them that'll be visible from the vocal booth.
 
Plus I'm really enjoying SONAR anew with all this screen real estate. Mixcraft looks pretty good on it, too.
 


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#42
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8424
  • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/28 00:22:56 (permalink)
I beleieve you are somehow not reading your Latency figures corectly. The DAW has nothing to do with this,, Example I have 4 DAWs loaded right now and all of them show the exact same RTL figure. They would have to.  Some just say it differently. 
The RTL figure only changes when you change the buffer in your interfaces conrtol panel. Or is you change to a different clock rate, the higher the clock rate the better the performance. 
You can also ue a utility which always seemed to match Sonars report exactly for most of us.  
http://www.oblique-audio.com/free/rtlutility  
 
But those figures are determined by the Drivers. You'll even get the same readings no matter what the computer specs or OS. The only differance is a underpowered computer won't run smoothly at low buffer settings. 
 
 

Johnny V  
Cakelab  
Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
 http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
 
 
#43
Larry Jones
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 834
  • Joined: 2007/10/11 02:45:33
  • Location: Southern California
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/28 01:08:58 (permalink)
I'm in my first half hour with The Mixcraft demo, and I find I can't play any MIDI instrument (so far) because the monitoring latency is too high (so far). I'm hoping I can figure out how to adjust this. I'm using a Scarlett 6i6 and had no problem with latency in SONAR or Studio One.
 
EDIT: It's OK now. Mixcraft defaults to Core Audio (WaveRT) in the interface settings. Changed to ASIO. Much better. I'm not sure this can be my main DAW, but I like to make music videos, so I have to keep it in mind for that.
EDIT #2: I have no problem with how it looks, although I will admit the wood-look side rails on the mixer are pretty cheezy.
post edited by Larry Jones - 2017/11/28 01:30:24

SONAR Platinum 2017.10 • CbB  Win10 • i7/2600 • 16GB RAM • Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 • NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS
#44
Rski
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 146
  • Joined: 2004/02/13 20:33:56
  • Location: Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/28 02:54:45 (permalink)
I am enjoying the demo, most vst and vsti loaded, was able to record VSTi and waves...straight forward. The sends taken awhile to launch, multiple sends are cool. The interface is different, I like that the scrolling wheel can expand or retract the horizontal, slick. The vertical scrolling of the mixer is easier than Sonar, however, when the Sonars X series came, that graphic docking it was a strong work flow plus, for me 
 
Grouping VST or VSTi taken awhile to grasp ...especially when the list is over 200, UAD throw everything in, I only have a few. I did state I will hold onto Sonar, long time user. I will say compared to studio one, I was up and running easier. Surprisingly some of Mix Craft effects are sweet
#45
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/28 04:14:02 (permalink)
So far everything I've tried in Mixcraft has been a breeze. Except one: there seems to be no way to edit multiple MIDI tracks at once. I'm holding out hope that I've just missed something, because that would be a showstopper. If somebody's figure that out, please let me know.
This got my hopes up, but no cigar... 



All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#46
Sacalait
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 552
  • Joined: 2008/01/01 16:59:28
  • Location: South Louisiana, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/28 04:52:06 (permalink)
backwoods
fade ins/outs and clip volume control is not very good in mixcraft compared with sonar


Amen.  Fading clips in Sonar is a big part of my workflow.  Hopefully they'll include it.

www.pershingwells.com www.facebook.com/pershingwells
Sonar Platinum, PC- Intel i7-4770K w/16 Gig RAM Windows 8.1, Solid State Drive and eSATA drives, Mytek, RME UFX, RME Multiface II, Roland VS700,  A-Designs Pacifica, UA LA610, Presonus RC500. A-Designs Hammer EQ, DBX, AKG, Neumann, Roland, JBL, Fender, Gibson, G&L, Marshall, Korg, Martin, Shure, Electrovoice, Yamaha, Chameleon Labs comps.
#47
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/28 05:07:00 (permalink)
bitflipper
So far everything I've tried in Mixcraft has been a breeze. Except one: there seems to be no way to edit multiple MIDI tracks at once. I'm holding out hope that I've just missed something, because that would be a showstopper. If somebody's figure that out, please let me know.
This got my hopes up, but no cigar... 



Yeah, in the video, you'd think if he'd scroll down in the MIDI editor, you'd see the second track's MIDI data...
#48
ampfixer
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5508
  • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
  • Location: Ontario
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/28 18:08:47 (permalink)
Remember, Mixcraft doesn't cost $600.

Regards, John 
 I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
#49
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/29 00:14:34 (permalink)
ampfixer
Remember, Mixcraft doesn't cost $600.




No, I get it.  I think it's a pretty snappy little DAW.  Even has those performance pads.
#50
bandso
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 361
  • Joined: 2007/04/15 23:48:13
  • Location: Boston, MA
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/29 14:47:13 (permalink)
Mixcraft does not allow you to zoom down to sample level yet. That is crucial to properly place in drum samples over top of live drums. I've asked for it several times over the last few years, but the developers don't seem to have that improvement on their radar. I can still use slate trigger or melodyne to convert drum hits to midi, but I though it was worth mentioning to those who are thinking of switching. 

Bandlab Platinum and every other toy I can get my hands on...and yes I'm way in debt over this obsession...
#51
Starise
Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7563
  • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/29 14:52:37 (permalink)
I downloaded it last night as a purchase. I'm glad I did. I believe it might be a keeper for fast audio simple synth track work. Might be better for much more, but right now I'm viewing it as a great way to assemble music which I might then, move into something else for final master.
 
The asking price during the sale is a real bargain. My advice: Buy at least a few daws with different strengths. These year end deals are a good way to jump into a few for less.

Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
 CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
 
 www.soundcloud.com/starise
 
 
 
Twitter @Rodein
 
#52
bandso
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 361
  • Joined: 2007/04/15 23:48:13
  • Location: Boston, MA
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/29 14:54:57 (permalink)
Also with Mixcraft there isn't a tool that will let you edit audio across multiple tracks like Audio Snap. You can place edit markers and adjust a single audio track at a time, but you cant lock them together and slide entire groups of audio (think multi track drum editing). 
 

Bandlab Platinum and every other toy I can get my hands on...and yes I'm way in debt over this obsession...
#53
TPayton
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 178
  • Joined: 2014/09/26 11:23:12
  • Location: Indiana
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/29 23:10:09 (permalink)
 


AT
Better latency than 1.5 ms?  That is pretty fast.



Sorry, I think I did not express that well. With my machine I am getting nowhere near 1.5 ms. What I should have typed was--- My Scarlett 18i20 shows better latency figures in Mixcraft than it did running in Sonar. Excuse the inaccuracy.

Tom
#54
riojazz
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1337
  • Joined: 2004/02/26 13:23:02
  • Location: Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
  • Status: offline
Re: MixCraft may as well be Sonar. 2017/11/29 23:22:39 (permalink)
bitflipper
So far everything I've tried in Mixcraft has been a breeze. Except one: there seems to be no way to edit multiple MIDI tracks at once. I'm holding out hope that I've just missed something, because that would be a showstopper. If somebody's figure that out, please let me know.



It was answered in (yet) another thread that Mixcraft (which I like so far) does not allow this.  You can only see the one MIDI track at a time.  That was the answer by aconte22.

Software: Cakewalk by Bandlab; Adobe Audition; Band-in-A-Box audiophile; Izotope Ozone; Encore; Melodyne; Win 10 Pro, 64-bit.

Hardware: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 2nd; Roland Integra-7; TCE Finalizer; Presonus Central Station, Behringer X-Touch.  Home built i7 with 16 GB RAM, SSDs.
#55
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1