Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...?

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/19 23:05:21 (permalink)
I don't unfreeze before exporting a mix down.

Best
John
#31
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/19 23:52:39 (permalink)
There is no reason to unfreeze before a final mixdown. Frozen audio is stored as floating point data so there is no loss of resolution compared to the synth.
BTW there is an audio snap command that allows you to "un audiosnap" clips from the AS toolbar I think. That should get rid of the extra processing passes if the audio snap operation was unintended..

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#32
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 00:09:26 (permalink)
I freeze the synths, copy and drag them to another audio track, then unfreeze the synth and archive it.  Then I can process the copied freeze just like any other audio.

I export the project in the project format (bit depth and sample rate) and import it back into the project and save it so it stays w/ the rest of the project.  I can copy the mixdown version into Sound Forge or any program I want to master it and make final copies.  A fairly simple process that works for me.

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#33
noynekker
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1235
  • Joined: 2012/01/12 01:09:45
  • Location: POCO, by the river, Canada
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 00:26:01 (permalink)
I believe freezing was created to free up system resources, for projects with lots going on, or systems that are RAM limited. When using frozen tracks, it enables you to keep latency at maximum levels, if you need to record something live, or play in a new part to a complex project.

If your latency is good, no dropouts as the project progresses, then I think it's true . . . you may never need to freeze any of your tracks.
#34
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 01:54:27 (permalink)
Teds_Studio


BTW....what is the reason for freezing if you need to unfreeze before mixing down?  Is it to free up processing power of the DAW?  I have a fairly powerful PC especially for doing audio....it works fine for working on HD video which I also do on this same PC, so I would think it would handle audio with ease.

So if I understand this right...I really have no need to freeze anything unless my PC is getting bogged down?


edited to fix typo


Correct.
#35
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 03:54:56 (permalink)
Yes, the only time I freeze these days is if my system is struggling to keep up with all that Midi data being processed.

Some people like to freeze their synths once tracking/recording has finished so that when you're mixing, you are working totally in the Audio world, not Midi.

It might be prudent to freeze your synths whenever a project is 'finished' (define finished ) and to save the resulting audio only project down with a different name, just in case you decided to re-visit it at some time in the future and you find that a particular synth is no longer on your system.

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#36
deanx
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Joined: 2008/10/05 10:11:10
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 06:58:34 (permalink)
Does anybody else hear a slight dip in volume when freezing tracks or is it just me?

I haven't needed to freeze tracks for a while now after upgrading my system. But in the past when I used to freeze all my Ampitube and Superior Drummer tracks I could swear there was a slight reduction in volume. I'd slighty increase volume but when it came to un -freezing they would be a little to hot.

I also thought freezing tracks was a quick way to reduce CPU by using a quick algoritm, and tracks should be unfrozen, unfreezed, um.. thawed, before exporting a track or project. Which I was under the impression uses a better algorithm than freezing.

Is that right?

Thanks
Dean
#37
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 08:06:24 (permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey

It might be prudent to freeze your synths whenever a project is 'finished' (define finished ) and to save the resulting audio only project down with a different name, just in case you decided to re-visit it at some time in the future and you find that a particular synth is no longer on your system.

+1. Freezing a project before archiving it is your best insurance against a synth getting obsolete. I do this on every project of mine. Lets say you want to  open up that project 5-10 years from now for a remix or some reason. You have a new OS new machine and the old crusty synth no longer exists. You have all you need to work with that project again. Unfreezing gives you back the MIDI data should you need to reassign it to a different synth.
Another good reason to freeze - an update to a synth may change the way it sounds which could be a problem if you have a finished project and just need to remix. Also some synths generate non-deterministic output which can vary slightly on each bounce.

Or in SONAR you can use the quick unfreeze feature to quickly audition differences between a prior part and a new one. Many reasons to freeze besides saving CPU. 


Edit: I missed another very good reason to freeze. Stability! Once you freeze you have completely eliminated all the DSP code in the synth from running. So you are completelu insured against any bugs in the synth (crashes, memory leaks, heap corruption) from causing instability in your SONAR project. Once you get to the mixing stage there is seldom any need to tweak any parameters related to the synth so freezing allows you to work with just the audio and a completely stable inside DAW only environment.
post edited by Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk] - 2012/09/20 19:11:37

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#38
synkrotron
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5263
  • Joined: 2006/04/28 16:21:21
  • Location: Warrington, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 08:11:09 (permalink)
I'll generally freeze a synth and then straight away I'll drag/copy the wave clip to a brand new track (just by dragging it into space). I'll then unfreeze the synth so I get the MIDI data back and archive it, or just mute it or now.

http://www.synkrotron.co.uk/
Intel Core™i7-3820QM Quad Core Mobile Processor 2.70GHz 8MB cache | Intel HM77 Express Chipset | 16GB SAMSUNG 1600MHz SODIMM DDR3 RAM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M - 2.0GB DDR5 Video RAM | 500GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | 1TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | Windows 10 Pro | Roland OCTA-CAPTURE | SONAR Platinum ∞ FFS| Too many VSTi's to list here | KRK KNS-8400 Headphones | Roland JP-8000 | Oberheim OB12 | Novation Nova | Gibson SG Special | PRS Studio
#39
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 944
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
  • Location: Adelaide Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 09:06:59 (permalink)
FastBikerBoy


Teds_Studio


BTW....what is the reason for freezing if you need to unfreeze before mixing down?  Is it to free up processing power of the DAW?  I have a fairly powerful PC especially for doing audio....it works fine for working on HD video which I also do on this same PC, so I would think it would handle audio with ease.

So if I understand this right...I really have no need to freeze anything unless my PC is getting bogged down?

Correct.  
edited to fix typo
Ted,you shouldn't have to freeze with an i7 2600k cpu,but about the "no audio pop up" if you select File/Export/Audio,I sometimes get that,and for me it only happens on my laptop[dell xps-a bit buggy] and if I save/reopen it will then usually be nice enough to get me to the "Export Audio" box,and when I'm there I usually select "Source Category"-Entire Mix,"source Busses/Tracks"-Audio Output.
Often I have it "blank" for "preset",and all the usual 16 bit 44.1 "dither" Power 3,and 64 bit Engine,the thing with this laptop[that may be occurring with yours as well ?] is I have to make sure the destination in Windows is correct as THAT will often be in-correct,so I must choose "libraries" etc,just like if I want a Pro Channel preset the wrong page opens[always on laptop] and I must find that.
Then its just press "Export",and it usually goes fine.
If I'm doing anything wrong here,someone let me know,Thanks!
Bob

Edit: I Totally missed Sir Noel's other myriad of reasons to freeze,so sorry about that,I generally haven't had much synth stuff happening,exept for Drum/soft synth,and I still have'nt bounced or frozen there yet[bounced yes,frozen no]


post edited by bobguitkillerleft - 2012/09/20 09:16:27

https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs
"You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix    
#40
g_randybrown
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3522
  • Joined: 2003/12/24 11:30:04
  • Location: Las Cruces, NM, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 10:46:24 (permalink)
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk
]

Bristol_Jonesey

It might be prudent to freeze your synths whenever a project is 'finished' (define finished ) and to save the resulting audio only project down with a different name, just in case you decided to re-visit it at some time in the future and you find that a particular synth is no longer on your system.

+1. Freezing a project before archiving it is your best insurance against a synth getting obsolete. I do this on every project of mine. Lets say you want to  open up that project 5-10 years from now for a remix or some reason. You have a new OS new machine and the old crusty synth no longer exists. You have all you need to work with that project again. Unfreezing gives you back the MIDI data should you need to reassign it to a different synth.
Another good reason to freeze - an update to a synth may change the way it sounds which could be a problem if you have a finished project and just need to remix. Also some synths generate non-deterministic output which can vary slightly on each bounce.


Or in SONAR you can use the quick unfreeze feature to quickly audition differences between a prior part and a new one. Many reasons to freeze besides saving CPU. 
This is very valuable info for me.... I had old projects (PA 9) I wish I would have at least saved the midi files...I'm now recreating them from scratch from a stereo wav.
Just to make sure I completely understand this procedure of archiving I would save as a cwb right?
Thanks Noel,
Randy



G. Randy Brown 
Windows 10, 64 bit, Platinum
Intel Core i7-3770S
Asus P8Z77-V LK mobo   
4X8GB Corsair XMS3 memory 
500 GB Crucial BX100 SSD (OS)
two WD Black 1 TB HDD
SAPPHIRE DUAL-X 100314-4L Radeon HD 6970 2GB 256-Bit GDDR5 
Presonus AudioBox 22VSL
youtube.com/crystalclearnm
#41
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 10:56:53 (permalink)
No problem ........

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#42
SONARtist
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 599
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 17:10:31
  • Location: Switzerland
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 18:05:12 (permalink)
synkrotron


I'll generally freeze a synth and then straight away I'll drag/copy the wave clip to a brand new track (just by dragging it into space). I'll then unfreeze the synth so I get the MIDI data back and archive it, or just mute it or now.


Yeah, that's exactly what I do too.  I prefer to work in just one environment, audio.  But the safeguard is there in case I need to change anything in MIDI, in which case I just re-freeze, move resulting audio and unfreeze.
#43
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 19:14:33 (permalink)
g_randybrown

This is very valuable info for me.... I had old projects (PA 9) I wish I would have at least saved the midi files...I'm now recreating them from scratch from a stereo wav. 
Just to make sure I completely understand this procedure of archiving I would save as a cwb right?

Randy

X2 will read even PA9 files so you should get all your MIDI tracks back intact as long as you have the .wrk or .bun files.
There is no need to save as a cwb. You can save as per project audio files and then archive the entire project folder. Thats actually the preferred way. 

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#44
Integra2112
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20
  • Joined: 2003/11/21 03:40:22
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 19:24:53 (permalink)
I always bounce all tracks first.

This allows me to see the dynamic range of the final mix and subsequently apply various mastering touches if necessary. I then export and archive the mixed track. This method, I have a 'history' of subsequent mixes within the project file itself in case they are needed for reference/reversion in the future.
#45
TraceyStudios
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 603
  • Joined: 2005/10/13 12:40:33
  • Location: Chandler, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/20 21:23:06 (permalink)
seems to me bounced tracks get saved, "frozen" track are not saved (deleted when "unfrozen").

AMD FX-6100 six-core processor 3.3GHz
8 Gig RAM
SONAR X3 Producer
Tascam FW1884
Mackie Blackbird
Presonus Digimax
Avalon U5
BFD2
SL Trigger
Alesis DM8 Pro drums
KRK Rokit 8s
KRK 10s
ARC2

Folgers Dark Roast, a bit of crazy :)
& lots of help from the forums!
 
http://www.reverbnation.com/blakkmire
#46
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/21 03:58:35 (permalink)
A bounce will create a brand new wav in a brand new track, or tracks

A freeze will, in the case of a soft synth, create a new wav and place it in the audio portion of a Midi/Audio pair fo tracks. When you unfreeze - you go back to the Midi so naturally, the Audio is discarded.

Freezing a track should not delete the original waveform.

Make sure you know what you're freezing - tracks or synths

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#47
LJB
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1502
  • Joined: 2009/07/29 10:31:31
  • Location: South Africa
  • Status: offline
Re:Mixing a song...is it really this complicated...? 2012/09/21 04:18:37 (permalink)
BTW, Sonar Plus's BULK FREEZE still works in X1D, just so you know. Just make sure all folders are expanded as it won't freeze any tracks hidden inside a collapsed folder. I still don't get why Cakewalk doesn't just give us a Bulk Freeze option, Benstat nailed it years ago!
 
This might have been mentioned here somewhere, but the other reason to freeze ALL tracks and BOUNCED busses is for archiving reasons - it saved my bacon on more than one occasion when a client suddelny wants a remix or a backtrack and the plus have become obsolete!

Ludwig Bouwer, One Big Room Studios.
--------------------
Cakewalk
with all the trimmings / Win 10Pro 64 / Intel i7-7700 / Asus Prime Z270k / 16GB DDR4 / RME HDSP9652 / RME UFX / Black Lion Audio ADA8000 / ART MPA & ART Pro Channel / Focusrite Voicemaster Pro / Aphex 107

Check out my work at www.onebigroom.co.za

#48
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1