Monitoring input with post fader effects (Guitar Rig)?

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
lawajava
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2040
  • Joined: 2012/05/31 23:23:55
  • Location: Seattle
  • Status: offline
Re:Monitoring input with post fader effects (Guitar Rig)? 2012/06/23 02:42:01 (permalink)
Both sound great...

Two internal 2TB SSDs laptop stuffed with Larry's deals and awesome tools. Studio One is the cat's meow as a DAW now that I've migrated off of Sonar. Using BandLab Cakewalk just to grab old files when migrating songs.
#31
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re:Monitoring input with post fader effects (Guitar Rig)? 2012/06/23 02:50:49 (permalink)
But that's the thing. If I am monitoring the DAW through the Scarlett (as opposed to the direct monitor option) I should be able to get GR overtop of my signal (but latency applies). Now that I've figured out the echo button issue it shouldn't be a problem. Anyway I think the work around to my clip layer/muting issue is to just add a layer each time I do a new take. It'd actually be a lot easier than my old way. It will also keep me from loading up disc space with takes I forgot about or finding little surprises when I go to trim or cut clips.
#32
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re:Monitoring input with post fader effects (Guitar Rig)? 2012/06/23 02:53:41 (permalink)
Come to think of it it would make cross fading a whole heck of a lot simpler too... at least it seems like it would.
#33
SToons
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 478
  • Joined: 2012/05/14 15:21:14
  • Status: offline
Re:Monitoring input with post fader effects (Guitar Rig)? 2012/06/23 02:58:39 (permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey


SToons


Bristol_Jonesey


I think if you have layers & loop enabled on your track then each successive take will be muted.

I think what you're describing is you record a take, stop, listen to it, then go back and do another one yes?

If you just continuously loop and record several takes, each previous one will be muted

True, just as I mentioned. The problem with this approach on a single track is that it still leaves each take physically buried under another unless you set it to go to seperate tracks. And as Beepster asked, there doesn`t appear to be a convenient way to sort thru various takes if they`re all stacked on top of each other in a single track. Not an insurmountable problem but an unneccesary pain in the rear unless you know of some key binding stuff I`m unaware of - quite possible!

I might be missing something here
Yes, what you're missing is my reply three posts after the one you quoted, post #24, that starts with "I stand corrected..."
;-p
#34
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1