Helpful ReplyMy Biggest Fear with X3...

Page: < 12345 > Showing page 3 of 5
Author
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 07:28:36 (permalink)
Yes. LatencyMon is good for all Windows Machines and it works the same. It is also good on x64 based OS Installs. It only takes 10 or 20 minutes from Install to report. Look for your top few offenders. As I reported above, my greatest latency is 0.17 milliseconds. If you get any over 0.5 you should be concerned and note the names of the DLLs and post them so you can be advised. Some of the DLLs will be familiar to the community and we can tell you exactly what is doing you in.
 
I remember one laptop I had where if I disabled the monitor driver, the monitor would still work on a generic driver but my dropouts stopped. It's these little things that the LatencyMon will point you to. If you know the DLL you're halfway home.

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#61
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 08:43:47 (permalink)
Daylaa
I see all of mine (Record, Render and Import) are currently set to 64. So would you recommend I change mine to what yours are?

 
As others have said the ideal settings are the defaults Record=24, Render=32 and Import=original
Its pretty rare that you need render=64 and you never want to set record > 24 since no converters go higher than 24 except for a few drivers that support streaming float audio. If they have hardware input fx that would be the only time you might want that.
Going higher is taxing the Disk as well as the I/O thread and using excess CPU. If you have large projects with lots of tracks this could certainly add up and lead to spikes esp if your disk is slow.
 
 

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#62
Roo Stercogburn
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 112
  • Joined: 2013/07/08 05:27:45
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 08:45:34 (permalink)
How often does your PC do an anti-virus scan?
 
 
Edit: Also, next time you get it, the *first* time you get it, note the time. Then when you get an opportunity, check the System and Application event logs for just before that time and just afterwards.
#63
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 16:36:50 (permalink)
Roo Stercogburn
How often does your PC do an anti-virus scan?



Hi Roo - My main machine doesn't have Anti-Virus on it as I brows using the virtual PC 'Rainzone'. So this can't be a problem. I'm told by RAIN that Rainzone cannot effect my main system.
 
OBHave - Although I feel your pain and frustration first hand, it sure is nice to know someone else has the same issue as me and I'm not completely alone with this. Please also let me know if you find a cure.
 
I seem to have found peace with my Pro Channel - but I'm not going to say it's 'fixed' just yet. My setting now are: 256 Samples (on soundcard interface and in 'sync and caching'). And then as Noel has recommended: Record=24, Render=32 and Import=original.
 
If I raise my sample rate higher, Pro Channel becomes glitchy again. This strikes me as strange still, as surely my PC should handle this kind of thing better? There are people on here with less powerful machines enjoying much looser reins with regards to sample rates.
 
I will continue to keep this thread posted - will play around with Pro Channel every day if I can.
 

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#64
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 17:01:18 (permalink)
I just took a look at that Audiophile interface. Is that your main interface? Did Rain computers install it/recommend it? Is it a legacy PCI interface (which it seems to be) or is it PCIe?
 
The reason I ask this is because if your PCI slot is "bridged" which is the case with many new motherboards this could be causing your problems. That is why I had to buy my Focusrite. Bridged screws with the datastream somehow. What you want, and what used to be the standard was "native" PCI support which I think means it has it's own chipset whereas bridged sends it off to be dealt with by the PCIe chipset or some such nonsense. I'm not a computer tech but I think that's the story.
 
Also I've seen quite a few people have issues with M-Audio interfaces, particularly the PCI ones.
 
As soon as I bought my Focusrite USB 18i6 interface Sonar started working a whole heck of a lot better. If at all possible I'd suggest you borrow or rent a different interface that does NOT use the PCI slot (USB 2.0 is fine for audio).
 
Other than that, and I'm sure it has already been mentioned but I haven't checked all the new posts here, I'd get a hold of M-Audio or check their site to see if you have the correct/most up to date drivers or google the interface to see if anyone else is having similar problems.
 
If you've already been through this my apologies but it's worth mentioning. I just hadn't checked out your interface until just now otherwise I would have said something sooner. Cheers.
#65
SuperG
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1371
  • Joined: 2012/10/19 16:09:18
  • Location: Edgewood, NM
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 19:41:53 (permalink)
I can't remember where I originally read it, but bridged PCI devices on PCIe bus, share the same [PCIe] interrupt priority (ala the bridge mechanism).  It's a decent design - but all PCI devices have to wait their turn to be exposed on the PCIe bus thru that single priority. It puts an extra level of intervention in place for things like memory access - not what you'd normally want for a high I/O-count device.
 
Better to go with PCIe today for direct bussed devices, or USB/Firewire as they are usually motherboard devices with direct memory access.
 
 

laudem Deo
#66
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 19:46:16 (permalink)
I used to use an old M-Audio internal interface on an XP Desktop a lifetime ago. It worked fairly well IIRC. I didn't use it much though.
 
And I can't speak to the bridging stuff that Beep refers to.
 
I would say that if the interface is working properly for other DAW software (which I think Daylaa has reported) then it should work similarly well within Sonar if he gets it dialed in correctly.
 
That isn't to say that and upgrade of interface wouldn't help. It certainly will. But that if you push up your buffers etc, you should be able to work with your current setup.
 
We all have ceilings of one sort or another that we deal with. Number of inputs... cables... mics... Unless you're Bapu, plugins. ;-)
 
So, I would focus on getting what you have to work sufficiently. Post your DPC Latencies reported by the program I listed, Daylaa. Don't get us writing all this stuff and fail to deliver on your side. Take 10 minutes and run the app and tell us what you find.

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#67
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/21 21:14:30 (permalink)
In PCIe motherboards, PCI slots are treated as legacy devices and the implementation of passing data is flaky and varies from board to board. In audio devices where I/O is paramount this kind of a kludge exposes your system to instabilities.

The lesson basically is that for recent MOBO's get PCIe cards for audio or use USB or even firewire

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#68
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 03:44:49 (permalink)
Gswitz - my apologies. I will get those results on for u asap. Really Appreciate everyone's help. I'm currently walking to work in rainy England so I will post them later soon as I can.

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#69
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 03:54:19 (permalink)
... also, I wonder if anyone can recreate this issue on their machines? By setting record and render to 64 and upping the samples on sound card? Does pro channel e q become glitchy?

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#70
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 05:05:32 (permalink)
I would be very surprised if setting both of those parameters to 64 bit did NOT cause glitches.
 
As Noel pointed out above, there is absolutely zero benefit in setting record bit depth to 64 (there aren't any commercially available 32 bit converters yet, let alone 64 bit).
 
Is it as wet in Derby as it is in Bristol? It's bucketing down here, and has been for hours.

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#71
yevster
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 761
  • Joined: 2007/09/19 02:07:47
  • Location: Eastern Massachusetts
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 12:50:39 (permalink)
Daylaa
...Is the Pro Channel causing huge drop outs.
 
My experience of X2 was a nightmare because every time I tried to sweep a frequency using the Pro Channel EQ, everything dropped out or buzzed or froze. Constantly.




I haven't seen issues with dropouts. On the other hand, I have seen, across multiple projects and, seemingly, at random occasions, the console emulator and the tape saturator mute all the signal going through them. Restarting Sonar seems to fix the problem.
#72
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 14:54:58 (permalink)
Daylaa
... also, I wonder if anyone can recreate this issue on their machines? By setting record and render to 64 and upping the samples on sound card? Does pro channel e q become glitchy?



So far.... nope.   I tried setting everything to 64, but didn't see any resource usage difference in Task Manager and I could move the EQ nodes all over the place without any noise.  I did use the flyout for this since I'd imagine it uses more resources than the smaller graph, and because it's more fun to move the nodes around.   
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
#73
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 16:39:23 (permalink)
Gswitz: As requested, here are my LatencyMon results for a span of 52 minutes:
 
Firstly, it's telling me that my system can handle audio without dropouts (in the green text).
I have run LatencyMon in the past and it's given me red text.
 
CONCLUSION
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Your system appears to be suitable for handling real-time audio and other tasks without dropouts.
LatencyMon has been analyzing your system for  0:52:38  (h:mm:ss) on all processors.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SYSTEM INFORMATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Computer name:                                        NIMBUS
OS version:                                           Windows 7 Service Pack 1, 6.1, build: 7601 (x64)
Hardware:                                             ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC., P8Z77-V
CPU:                                                  GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
Logical processors:                                   8
Processor groups:                                     1
RAM:                                                  32449 MB total


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU SPEED
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reported CPU speed:                                   3500.0 MHz
Measured CPU speed:                                   2843.0 MHz (approx.)

Note: reported execution times may be calculated based on a fixed reported CPU speed. Disable variable speed settings like Intel Speed Step and AMD Cool N Quiet in the BIOS setup for more accurate results.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MEASURED INTERRUPT TO USER PROCESS LATENCIES
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The interrupt to process latency reflects the measured interval that a usermode process needed to respond to a hardware request from the moment the interrupt service routine started execution. This includes the scheduling and execution of a DPC routine, the signaling of an event and the waking up of a usermode thread from an idle wait state in response to that event.

Highest measured interrupt to process latency (µs):   373.022214
Average measured interrupt to process latency (µs):   1.163005

Highest measured interrupt to DPC latency (µs):       371.559382
Average measured interrupt to DPC latency (µs):       0.366711


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MEASURED SMI, IPI AND CPU STALLS
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The SMI, IPI and CPU stalls value represents the highest measured interval that a CPU did not respond while having its maskable interrupts disabled.

Highest measured SMI or CPU stall (µs)                0.585133


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 REPORTED ISRs
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Interrupt service routines are routines installed by the OS and device drivers that execute in response to a hardware interrupt signal.

Highest ISR routine execution time (µs):              165.327429
Driver with highest ISR routine execution time:       ndis.sys - NDIS 6.20 driver, Microsoft Corporation

Highest reported total ISR routine time (%):          0.009008
Driver with highest ISR total time:                   ndis.sys - NDIS 6.20 driver, Microsoft Corporation

Total time spent in ISRs (%)                          0.015761

ISR count (execution time <250 µs):                   4179407
ISR count (execution time 250-500 µs):                0
ISR count (execution time 500-999 µs):                0
ISR count (execution time 1000-1999 µs):              0
ISR count (execution time 2000-3999 µs):              0
ISR count (execution time >=4000 µs):                 0


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
REPORTED DPCs
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DPC routines are part of the interrupt servicing dispatch mechanism and disable the possibility for a process to utilize the CPU while it is interrupted until the DPC has finished execution.

Highest DPC routine execution time (µs):              997.624286
Driver with highest DPC routine execution time:       vmm.sys - Virtual Machine Monitor, Microsoft Corporation

Highest reported total DPC routine time (%):          0.015639
Driver with highest DPC total execution time:         rspLLL64.sys - Resplendence Latency Monitoring and Auxiliary Kernel Library, Resplendence Software Projects Sp.

Total time spent in DPCs (%)                          0.050713

DPC count (execution time <250 µs):                   25069845
DPC count (execution time 250-500 µs):                0
DPC count (execution time 500-999 µs):                21
DPC count (execution time 1000-1999 µs):              0
DPC count (execution time 2000-3999 µs):              0
DPC count (execution time >=4000 µs):                 0


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 REPORTED HARD PAGEFAULTS
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hard pagefaults are events that get triggered by making use of virtual memory that is not resident in RAM but backed by a memory mapped file on disk. The process of resolving the hard pagefault requires reading in the memory from disk while the process is interrupted and blocked from execution.

NOTE: some processes were hit by hard pagefaults. If these were programs producing audio, they are likely to interrupt the audio stream resulting in dropouts, clicks and pops. Check the Processes tab to see which programs were hit.

Process with highest pagefault count:                 iastordatamgrsvc.exe

Total number of hard pagefaults                       34535
Hard pagefault count of hardest hit process:          23124
Highest hard pagefault resolution time (µs):          1000090.110857
Total time spent in hard pagefaults (%):              0.169578
Number of processes hit:                              23


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 PER CPU DATA
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 0 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       23.828245
CPU 0 ISR highest execution time (µs):                165.327429
CPU 0 ISR total execution time (s):                   3.982716
CPU 0 ISR count:                                      4179407
CPU 0 DPC highest execution time (µs):                992.271714
CPU 0 DPC total execution time (s):                   12.165129
CPU 0 DPC count:                                      24467505
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 1 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       6.327839
CPU 1 ISR highest execution time (µs):                0.0
CPU 1 ISR total execution time (s):                   0.0
CPU 1 ISR count:                                      0
CPU 1 DPC highest execution time (µs):                997.624286
CPU 1 DPC total execution time (s):                   0.020520
CPU 1 DPC count:                                      16056
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 2 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       7.0020
CPU 2 ISR highest execution time (µs):                0.0
CPU 2 ISR total execution time (s):                   0.0
CPU 2 ISR count:                                      0
CPU 2 DPC highest execution time (µs):                997.409143
CPU 2 DPC total execution time (s):                   0.161566
CPU 2 DPC count:                                      164856
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 3 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       6.400245
CPU 3 ISR highest execution time (µs):                0.0
CPU 3 ISR total execution time (s):                   0.0
CPU 3 ISR count:                                      0
CPU 3 DPC highest execution time (µs):                997.584286
CPU 3 DPC total execution time (s):                   0.017324
CPU 3 DPC count:                                      16167
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 4 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       6.532806
CPU 4 ISR highest execution time (µs):                0.0
CPU 4 ISR total execution time (s):                   0.0
CPU 4 ISR count:                                      0
CPU 4 DPC highest execution time (µs):                997.043429
CPU 4 DPC total execution time (s):                   0.190471
CPU 4 DPC count:                                      174680
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 5 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       6.121361
CPU 5 ISR highest execution time (µs):                0.0
CPU 5 ISR total execution time (s):                   0.0
CPU 5 ISR count:                                      0
CPU 5 DPC highest execution time (µs):                997.542286
CPU 5 DPC total execution time (s):                   0.017375
CPU 5 DPC count:                                      18212
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 6 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       6.715235
CPU 6 ISR highest execution time (µs):                0.0
CPU 6 ISR total execution time (s):                   0.0
CPU 6 ISR count:                                      0
CPU 6 DPC highest execution time (µs):                997.086571
CPU 6 DPC total execution time (s):                   0.221611
CPU 6 DPC count:                                      190317
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CPU 7 Interrupt cycle time (s):                       6.198162
CPU 7 ISR highest execution time (µs):                0.0
CPU 7 ISR total execution time (s):                   0.0
CPU 7 ISR count:                                      0
CPU 7 DPC highest execution time (µs):                997.114286
CPU 7 DPC total execution time (s):                   0.020942
CPU 7 DPC count:                                      22073

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#74
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 17:09:58 (permalink)
P.s - My top ratings for 'DPC Count' (Not counting the top placed one):
 
2= rdwm1027.sys (Roland)
3= Intel Rapid Storage Technology Driver - x64
4= NT Kernel & System
5= NDIS 6.20 Driver
6= Virtual Machine Monitor
 
Interestingly, the 'highest execution (ms) was 'Virtual Machine Monitor' followed by Intel Rapid Storage Technology Driver - x64 and NDIS 6.20 Driver.
 
So this all makes no sense whatsoever to me  - but hopefully something jumps out at you.
p.s - I have just received an email from RAIN Computers UK saying they're closing down!
 
 
 
 

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#75
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/22 22:28:13 (permalink)
Daylaa, Those numbers look pretty solid to me. There's nothing on the Drivers tab with a highest execution over 0.5 ms is there? I'm guessing not given the other numbers you're reporting.
 
Your computer looks good to me. Thanks for taking the time to confirm.
 
Since you down shifted to recording 24 bit files, how have things been going?

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#76
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 02:50:02 (permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey
Is it as wet in Derby as it is in Bristol? It's bucketing down here, and has been for hours.



I got wet.  However today's looking better. 
 
gswitz
Daylaa, Those numbers look pretty solid to me. There's nothing on the Drivers tab with a highest execution over 0.5 ms is there? I'm guessing not given the other numbers you're reporting.
 
Your computer looks good to me. Thanks for taking the time to confirm.
 
Since you down shifted to recording 24 bit files, how have things been going?




Thanks Gswitz - Yes things are still smooth...I guess I'm reluctant to say it's fixed just yet until I've given it a week of testing! But I'm extremely hopeful. Again, I will keep you posted. I will double - check with another LatencyMon reading later on. Specifically I will check the Drivers Tab for any execution over 0.5 ms like you've asked...
 
All the best,
Dave

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#77
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 17:07:41 (permalink)
Can I just ask - Is it usually a bad idea to change the sample rate on my M Audio card from 44100hz? Or is there room to experiment with this?

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#78
Daylaa
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 547
  • Joined: 2010/01/20 18:43:19
  • Location: Derby, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 17:22:22 (permalink)
I hate to be the bearer of confusing news - but I have tonight attempted to reproduce the issue by changing the record and render settings back to '64' and then pushing up my sound card buffers to 1024.
 
The Pro Channel continued to operate seamlessly - whilst this sounds like a positive thing, it surely means that we haven't yet found the cause of the problem?
 
*Edit: I have experienced days of seamless Pro Channel operation before only to switch on another day to find the problem has returned.

Sonar X3 Producer
Rain Computer's Nimbus Z2 I7 Processor
32GB RAM
Windows 7 Pro

Solid State HD
M Audio Audiophile 192
M Audio Studiophile BX5a Deluxe's

Edirol PCR 500
Melodyne

3 External HDrvs

I am 'I Woke a Giant' Hear my stuff at:
https://soundcloud.com/i-woke-a-giant
#79
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 17:25:50 (permalink)
Daylaa
Can I just ask - Is it usually a bad idea to change the sample rate on my M Audio card from 44100hz? Or is there room to experiment with this?




Keep your samplerate consistent with the project samplerate. 44.1 is CD quality but most people record above that and mix down (with dithering) to 44.1 for their final product. This is a big and rather important topic. If you are unsure about samplerates you should probably do a bit of research. Bit depth too.
 
You will however notice if your samplerate is out of sync with your project. It will usually sound faster or slower.
You don't need to know everything about samplerate/bit depth but some knowledge as far as what settings you should use at what points in your project is pretty imperative. I'd personally suggest you should record and mix at at least 48khz/24 bit and leave it there until you are ready to do your final mixdown for CD burning.
#80
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 17:41:49 (permalink)
Daylaa
I hate to be the bearer of confusing news - but I have tonight attempted to reproduce the issue by changing the record and render settings back to '64' and then pushing up my sound card buffers to 1024.
 
The Pro Channel continued to operate seamlessly - whilst this sounds like a positive thing, it surely means that we haven't yet found the cause of the problem?
 
*Edit: I have experienced days of seamless Pro Channel operation before only to switch on another day to find the problem has returned.




I've already mentioned the PCI card issue. The inconsistency may rule this out but still the card may be right on the edge of functionality (as was mentioned by someone else) and something minor on your system is pushing it over the edge. As I said if you can rent or borrow a solid USB interface (like a Focusrite) to test maybe that's the issue.
 
However... since this is intermittent I'm wondering. How quickly are you starting up Sonar after booting? Do you just plow into things or do you let your system "warm up" a little? Sometimes the system takes it's time finding all the drivers and devices and if you open Sonar too quick things go weird. I've had issues with MIDI controllers too where if I don't use a specific sequence to turn them on they just won't work. Example: If I turn my M-Audio Oxygen 25 on AFTER I open Sonar... it doesn't work. My padKontrol sometimes works, sometimes doesn't depending on how I start everything up. It definitely takes a little while for the system to detect MIDI connectivity (just like it takes a while for it to tell me whether I've got my network cable plugged in).
 
There are just lots of little things that can get messed up if you force the computer to do something it hasn't prepared itself to do yet. Keep track of how you booted up, how long you waited before opening Sonar, what devices you turned on or after opening Sonar and what results in good behavior or poor behavior.
 
Some people look at me a little sideways about my meticulous boot up ritual and device set up procedures but if I don't follow then I am more likely to have something not work or get a crash.
 
Our DAWs are like fancy European sports cars. Sometimes you gotta ease it into gear and pay attention to little nuances as you start 'er up and go ripping down the Autobahn.
 
I however am no tech. I'm still convinced smacking the monitor makes the computer work faster. That isn't nearly as satisfying with a flat panel screen though.
 
;-P
#81
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 18:07:53 (permalink)
Beepster
Keep your samplerate consistent with the project samplerate. 44.1 is CD quality but most people record above that and mix down (with dithering) to 44.1 for their final product. 

Beeeps. I'm sure you know this but you mis-typed/spoke on the dithering. Dithering is for bit rates (32/24/16/). You dither when you step down from 32/24 to 16.
 
IOW if you record at 16/48 but output at 16/44.1 you would not need to dither.
#82
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 18:35:26 (permalink)
Actually, Bapu I was indeed having a brainfart and thank you for the correction and apologies to the OP. I used to get all that stuff confused (as in I thought somehow dithering affected samplerate as well) and most certainly had corrected my faulty assumptions but today has been one of those days and it crept back into my rhetoric. In fact that entire post was mostly based on very non technical anecdotal evidence so should be taken with a grain of salt.
 
Still though I've noticed that if I give my system a little time to get itself sorted out before opening Sonar and turn on certain device in a certain order I have far less problems.
 
Basically Beepster voodoo but considering OP is experiencing the "gremlin" perhaps a little attention to such things may reduce the odd behavior.
 
Brainfarts, voodoo and personal ritual aside that PCI card does stand out to me as a potential problem.
 
Cheers.
#83
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/23 18:59:56 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby mudgel 2013/10/24 08:07:05
Daylaa
P.s - My top ratings for 'DPC Count' (Not counting the top placed one):
 
2= rdwm1027.sys (Roland)
3= Intel Rapid Storage Technology Driver - x64
4= NT Kernel & System
5= NDIS 6.20 Driver
6= Virtual Machine Monitor
 
Interestingly, the 'highest execution (ms) was 'Virtual Machine Monitor' followed by Intel Rapid Storage Technology Driver - x64 and NDIS 6.20 Driver.
 


The iastordatamgrsvc.exe under hard page faults is also Intel Rapid Storage. Are you running RAID? If not you may be able to disable this (I believe MS provides their own SSD drivers).
 
Based on your very powerful system, you should not be experiencing problems due to latency, sample rate, etc. And since I believe you said earlier you had the problem just running a sequence into a soft synth, I can't believe it's a disk throughput problem (though if you're using external drives, I'd generally recommend eSATA rather than USB).
 
That leaves things like drivers (sound, video, mouse, network, etc.), installation problems, HW problems (doesn't strike me as likely here), or of course SW bugs.
 
I would disconnect your network, shut down any firewalls and anti virus and also make sure nothing is trying to update or otherwise do anything in the background. Close everything except Sonar. If there's anything not absolutely necessary in the Taskbar notification area, right click on it and shut it down if you can. If you don't have RAID and can shut off Intel Rapid Storage without problems occurring, try that too. Make sure power management is not throttling the CPU.
 
Microsoft has a tool you can download called "Process Explorer" which is sort of like Task Manager on steroids and can show you very detailed information about each process and look at things like GPU usage as well. When I run X2 (64bit) on my much lower powered laptop here, spinning the ProChannel knobs increases Sonars CPU usage by only a few points and has even less impact on the GPU.

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#84
dman301
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2013/05/25 13:33:54
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/24 13:11:10 (permalink)
Thanks to everyone that contributed to this thread.  It has been very useful.  I built myself a Core i7 Ivy Bridge beast a little while back, and just assuming it would handle anything I threw at it, I had set all bit depths to 64.  I'm a software engineer, I should know better and I guess I just got cocky :)  My machine did actually handle most of everything I threw at it, but it makes absolute sense to set the record depth to 24 and render to 32. 
 
My question is, would changing these settings mid project create any issues?  Maybe this is more for Noel, or anyone that has attempted it.  I have more tracks to record.  If end up having a mix of 24 and 64 bit files, am I asking for trouble in Sonar engine/plug-in land?  (I'm now on the latest X3)
 
Would love to hear a success story...

Sonar X2a / Saffire Pro 40 / Win 7 64
#85
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/24 13:27:50 (permalink)
I've always heard changing bit depth mid project is a double plus ungood thing to do.
 
YMMV.
 
#86
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/24 13:50:02 (permalink)
Okay... the following needs to have a serious warning attached to it. I just barely grasp the concepts of samplerate and bit depth and all the various point within the software and mix process. The general concept of picking a samplerate and bit depth and sticking to it until final mixdown is solid but my blatherings about the internal audio engine and what not may be inaccurate hackery. I'm also doing a bunch of other crap so I haven't edited this post properly or thought it out as well as I could have. Just didn't want to see you doing something weird to your work. Hopefully the smarter dudes will correct any mistakes I have made.
 
dman301
Thanks to everyone that contributed to this thread.  It has been very useful.  I built myself a Core i7 Ivy Bridge beast a little while back, and just assuming it would handle anything I threw at it, I had set all bit depths to 64.  I'm a software engineer, I should know better and I guess I just got cocky :)  My machine did actually handle most of everything I threw at it, but it makes absolute sense to set the record depth to 24 and render to 32. 
 
My question is, would changing these settings mid project create any issues?  Maybe this is more for Noel, or anyone that has attempted it.  I have more tracks to record.  If end up having a mix of 24 and 64 bit files, am I asking for trouble in Sonar engine/plug-in land?  (I'm now on the latest X3)
 
Would love to hear a success story...




From what I understand Sonar 64's audio engine does everything at 64bits anyway despite what you have the project set to. Changing your bit depths mid session usually isn't advisable but if 64bit is giving you a problem then you could bounce everything you are working on down to 24bits (which seems to be what most people use as their bit depth settings). Just be sure to use dithering when doing these renders. There are different types of dithering so probably best to read up on that but I thing the Pwr Dither ones are the more quality algorithms. Also it's likely best to disable Fast Bounce so when the dithering is applied it is done in real time to avoid glitches. Cranking up your interface's audio buffers might be a good idea too but I'm not sure if that would effect anything but if the resulting bounce is causing pops or crackles that's a good place to look. I am not sure why you would want to render back up to 32 bits but that seems like a bad idea. You usually don't INCREASE bit depth. You generally work at a higher bit depth (like 24 or 32) and leave it there until the final mixdown then bring it down to 16 bit for CD burning. Even a mixdown you intend to send to a mastering house should remain at 24 bits. Perhaps you mean for internal bounces but I think just using the default settings would probably be fine... but seriously that's a weird thing to say and I'm not sure what you are referring to.
 
Sorry... that may sound scattered and weird and it is because I still find the topic confusing BUT from what I've learned....
 
While tracking, editing and mixing you would use a higher bit depth. 24 seems to be what usually gets used. Leave the project/interface at 24 bits (or whatever you choose as your bit depth) until you are ready to burn some CDs.
 
Once you are ready to burn to CD use the Mixdown/Export dialog to select your new bit depth which will be 16bit (and your samplerate will be 44.1khz).
 
That really is the only time you should have to worry about changing bit depth as far as I know.
 
Frankly unless your 64 bit projects are giving you a super hard time I'd leave them there until you mix down but any new projects you open definitely set them lower than that. Every time you dither down you are yanking out bits of info which is why you try to do it only once.
 
When mixing down to mp3 you don't even need to worry about bit depth in some cases because mp3 can actually run at 24 bits. It's just CDs.
 
And remember no matter what settings you have a 64 bit version of Sonar will process all your audio internally at 64 bits anyway as long as you have the Use 64 Bit Double Precision Engine selected in your Driver Preferences.
#87
dman301
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2013/05/25 13:33:54
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/24 14:20:21 (permalink)
Thanks for the words of warning.  What I missed was that record bit depth will physically write 64 bit samples to disc.  I was definitely at fault for not understanding what these internal settings really did.  I just always assumed my tracks were 24 bit in, 24 bit on the disc, and 24 bit out until I dithered down to 16 for Redbook, and all the 64 bit processing was internal to the engine only.  Hell, I never used dither going from 64 to 24 when I printed because of that assumption (although it sounded fine regardless because there probably wasn't significant data in the upper bits anyway... I'm curious if I'll notice a difference when I can test tonight...).  I would like to know more about the function of rendering and how it applies, especially if the engine is always working in 64 bit mode.  Does it even matter what render is set to at that point?  Is this in the documentation somewhere (I'm at work and should probably be working so I will have to check later)? 

Sonar X2a / Saffire Pro 40 / Win 7 64
#88
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/24 14:34:40 (permalink)
If you have one of Scott Garrigus' Sonar Power books he gives a better explanation than the manual.
 
I only recently learned about the internal bounce rendering bit depths a while ago and now understand what you may have been referring to. Like when you do a clip bounce or bounce effects to clip? Is that what you mean? I can't speak to that but IIRC that is indeed independent of the project bit depth just like the internal audio engine processing's bit depth. How that should be set I do not know but I've never had to screw with it and everything has worked out fine. I'd go with whatever the default is for internal rendering until you learn more. Checkout that Preferences > Drivers: 64 Bit Double Precision Audio Engine setting though because that's supposedly where all the quality internal processing magic happens. Aside from that all you should have to do is start you project at 24 bit, do all your work, then use dithering when mixing down to CD quality.
 
I don't even render down to 16 bit for my "final" mixdown. I do the mixdown at the same project bit depth/samplerate and then open the stereo wave in a new project to pretend like I'm mastering it. lol
 
This can be done within the existing project by bouncing to a new track or treating you master bus as the final master but I find that to be too confusing so I treat the mixdown and new project as if I'm sending it to a mastering house... the mastering house being derpy ole me. ;-)
 
Seriously though I'm just starting out. There are tons of articles on this kind of thing and much smarter dudes here that know what the deal is. I still hope you got a little help out of my blatherings.
 
Cheers.
#89
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: My Biggest Fear with X3... 2013/10/24 14:36:31 (permalink)
By the way 64 bit does nothing for you unless you have more than 4gb of RAM.
 
#90
Page: < 12345 > Showing page 3 of 5
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1