Pro-tools vs SonarX1

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
Zuma
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 525
  • Joined: 2006/01/13 17:56:03
  • Location: SoCal...High and dry in LA
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2011/05/25 09:53:53 (permalink)
I'm not knocking down anybody's request. I made a point that you  can take any DAW on the market and point out weaknesses. It's a fact that's true of every single one of them ioncluding Sonar. This isn't about brand loyalty... not to me anyway. Where did you see that knocked down his or anybody elses requests? The short answer is you didn't... you just read into what you wanted, the same as he did with my original post. I wasn't singling anybody out. Just stated a fact that none of them are perfect and someone is always going to be left wanting.
As for notation, there are third party notation that will interface with Sonar and fill in the gaps til the features one wants are available or updated.  So, I'm not singling anybody out or knocking down anybody's requests. Just stated my opinion and will apologize if it offended anyone.

http://zumajunction.bandcamp.com/

"the bus came by and I got on that's when it all began. There was cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never ever land."_



#31
vintagevibe
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2446
  • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2011/05/25 11:41:32 (permalink)
Zuma


vintagevibe


Zuma I don't want to see Sonar become Abelton, or Reason, or ProTools, etc. If I want/need those programs I'll buy 'em.


I don't either.  I just want Sonar to be Sonar but with useable notation.


Yeah? Well I want world peace but guess what? Some things you gotta wait for. You have options available to you in the mean time... don't pretend you like you don't.


Why the hostility?  It would be extremely counterproductive for me to bounce around be tween more than one DAW.
#32
vintagevibe
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2446
  • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2011/05/25 11:46:36 (permalink)
Zuma



As for notation, there are third party notation that will interface with Sonar and fill in the gaps til the features one wants are available or updated.  So, I'm not singling anybody out or knocking down anybody's requests.



I have Sibelius.  It is not the same as being able to compose inside Sonar.  If you don't work this way you likely don't understand this necessity.

#33
Zuma
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 525
  • Joined: 2006/01/13 17:56:03
  • Location: SoCal...High and dry in LA
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2011/05/25 15:58:27 (permalink)
vintagevibe


Zuma


vintagevibe


Zuma I don't want to see Sonar become Abelton, or Reason, or ProTools, etc. If I want/need those programs I'll buy 'em.


I don't either.  I just want Sonar to be Sonar but with useable notation.


Yeah? Well I want world peace but guess what? Some things you gotta wait for. You have options available to you in the mean time... don't pretend you like you don't.


Why the hostility?  It would be extremely counterproductive for me to bounce around be tween more than one DAW.

I wasn't being hostile nor was I feeling any hostility. Just making myself clear. My original post wasn't even a response to you... though it does tie in quite easily with what i meant to get across. When a DAW tries to be all things to all people it inevitably gets stretched too thin in certain or various areas, and you get the features and such that aren't what you'd think they should be. And I understand your frustration perfectly well. You might not want to bounce around but you might also have to accept the reality that you will have to seek out a third party app or maybe even an entirely different DAW. And if you do end up switching DAW's you inevitably find something in that one that leaves you scratching your head. There's just is no end all be all DAW and probably never will be. But there will always be avenues of choice available to us, and we owe it to our own peace of mind to seek them out versus experiencing perpetual frustration. And I also wasn't joking about getting all of them. I really was serious and speaking from own perspective. If I had the money i would at the very least own all of the big three... I think that would be a blast and make you one flexible, all-powerful SOB. But I offer my sincere  apologies if you took it that I was hating on you. I really wasn't though.... personal attacks are not to my taste.
post edited by Zuma - 2011/05/25 16:02:12

http://zumajunction.bandcamp.com/

"the bus came by and I got on that's when it all began. There was cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never ever land."_



#34
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2011/05/25 16:02:58 (permalink)
ithink alot of people confuse pro tools with pro tools hd.what is the indistry standard.
but reg.pro tools is i think as equaly good as x1..i think you gotta throw cubase in there too

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#35
Dave Modisette
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11050
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 22:12:55
  • Location: Brandon, Florida
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2011/05/25 17:57:31 (permalink)
When a DAW tries to be all things to all people it inevitably gets stretched too thin in certain or various areas, and you get the features and such that aren't what you'd think they should be.
Amen to this.

Dave Modisette ... rocks a Purrrfect Audio Studio Pro rig.

http://www.gatortraks.com 
My music.
... And of course, the Facebook page. 
#36
Herringbone
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7
  • Joined: 2011/01/21 01:20:19
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/02 01:55:01 (permalink)
  Just export files as broadcast waves, burn to dvd take them anywhere, any software.
#37
Michael Five
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 366
  • Joined: 2008/01/18 00:43:06
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/02 03:27:15 (permalink)
OzDoug64


So if you are working with commercial studios often what are the best options?

1/ Take in separate dry wave/aiff files for each track and let them do the arranging, or
2/ Buy the Protools platform and transfer the X1 projects over to protools so it's ready for the studio to work on.

I suppose the issue there is you have to take in the wave files less the effects, but if you take it in set up for protools they can do any adjusting easily if they have the same plugin packages.

What do you think? 
 

I think part of the issue with #2, while it seems logical, is that PT in a commercial studio is not really the same as PTLE, in terms of functionality and available plugs.     I couldn't justify paying for PTHD just to support total project compatibility with some other studio.  Plus, if somebody else really needs to be adjusting my fx, whatever I did with whatever I used is probably off in the weeds and they'll just dial up the sound they're after with whatever they normally use...


_______________________________________________
X1c, p35 6600 Quad OC@3Ghz, FF400, Saffire 6, IBM T42, UAD-1, Superior 2.0
#38
JustGotPaid
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 628
  • Joined: 2007/03/26 23:52:28
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/02 04:16:39 (permalink)
There's a saying around Nashville. "Everyone uses ProTools....because everyone uses Pro Tools."

One big factor is that Pro Tools works on a PC or a Mac. It's universal. Logic is Mac only and limits its market. SONAR is PC only and limits its market.

I'm a PC person but I have a Mac also. Macs are just naturally more suitable -- and designed -- for the artsy stuff. You can buy a Mac off the shelf, buy any version of Pro Tools, and the chances are you can hook it up and be up and running in no time, and hassle free. It's not that easy with a PC. That's why SONAR and others have a list of compatible computers. A MAC and ProTools is basically fool-proof. It's going to work right out of the box basically every time.

As popular as SONAR is I can't understand why the MAC people don't partner up with Cake and help design a Mac version. Or why SONAR doesn't just move ahead with their own development. I'd be surprised if they aren't already working on it. Seems to me it would draw more customers for both companies.

Sonar Platinum
 
#39
Dave Modisette
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11050
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 22:12:55
  • Location: Brandon, Florida
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/02 10:08:48 (permalink)
fitzj


I have read so much about pro-tools  for windows but compared to sonar pricing they charge crazy prices.
You purchase pro-tools nine but quickly you find that you need the expansion kit that give you beat Detective for stereo tracks plus you only get 1 instance without this expansion kit.
In the uk this will set you back pro-tools 9 with Vat £499.00
Extension pak £1499 - 1699 plus vat.
Pretty expensive when you count it all up compared to Sonar

Looks like Pro Tools 10 takes care of that.  Here's a bullet point:
 
" Multitrack Beat Detective and Elastic Audio let you correct timing across all of your tracks "

This is a good thread for me because I have an iLok on the way so that I can run the demo for PT 10.   I am definitely interested in the gotchas that might appear.

Dave Modisette ... rocks a Purrrfect Audio Studio Pro rig.

http://www.gatortraks.com 
My music.
... And of course, the Facebook page. 
#40
californiamusic
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 223
  • Joined: 2005/08/07 10:06:46
  • Location: Chicago, IL
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/02 10:33:56 (permalink)
I've worked extensively with Protools.. their midi section comes up way short compared to Sonar or Logic.  The goods and bads of any DAW ; )

Intel i7-4770 -  3.9GHZ DDR3  -  32GB RAM
Sonar Platinum
Presonus Studio 192
Motu 2408 MK3
Waves v9
Spectrasonics Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trilion 
Novation V-Station, Gladiator, ReFX Nexus, Lounge Lizard, Alchemy

www.soundcloud.com/glenntolliver
#41
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/02 10:39:19 (permalink)
Meno


Willy Jones [Cakewalk
]


I don't know if it has gotten any better but when I had Pro Tools the support was non-existant. This is the reason I went to Cakewalk.


Support is often overlooked, but is one of the things that I'm really proud that we can say is still free with SONAR and will continue to be.  I think in general you will find that the amount of free phone support we give (about 24 months for most products) exceeds all of our competitors.  $80 a phone call is a bit rough IMO.


Anyone starting out should take note...support wil be the most important thing to you nothing else will matter if you don't have good support. Good support also means support that is not outsourced to some call center in a country where the language can be an issue.

Cakewalk should be applauded for what you get for your money.

I have never looked back to Pro Tools and at this point never will.

Plus you get this forum which is another big big plus.

I, too, was a Pro Tools user....I started with version 8, which required a Digidesign Interface...

I was more then happy when version 9 let me use any interface I wanted...that was a HUGE uptick for ME...
as I don't like the MBox at all...my biggest issue with PRO TOOLS was no 64 bit version....

BUT, when X1 came out.....I was impressed, both with functionality, user interface, and what it brought to the table...love it...,

I started off as a Cubase user, with version 3, and went all the way to 5, made the change to Pro Tools....was never content with that...


AND, as has been pointed out....AVID Tech Support is THE WORST IN THE BUSINESS EVER!!!  It's virtually NON-EXISTENT!!!

They are the SELF PROCLAIMED industry standard...although CUBASE is in more studios worldwide then Pro Tools...

They are DRASTICALLY too expensive....period....they're support is TERRIBLE, and the program, even in version 10, is STILL 32 BIT...

All of this, for ME, adds up to a company that really doesn't CARE about what the customer wants or expects...because they THINK they are 
too big for their britches....

I love X1....and Cake support is first rate...which is a HUGE HUGE HUGE bonus...

I am going to give Digital Performer 8 a look when it comes out.....and it better have a WHOLE LOT to offer over X1...which I doubt that 
it will....to get me to switch...

For me, X1 is MILES AHEAD of anyone else in the game...but that's just my opinion...

And you know what they say about those...


#42
djwayne
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2021
  • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
  • Location: USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/02 11:16:15 (permalink)
I tried ProTools 9 SE..I really wanted to like it, but it crashes before completely just playing one song. Nothing but headaches after that. Sonar X1 Essentials on the other hand worked perfect for me. X1 has many more user control features that make the other programs look like toys. Since I upgraded to Producer, I have sooo much more to work with it's incredible. You don't realize the benefits of having all the extra bells and whistles until after you've had them for a while. Then you can appreciate what a great program X1 really is.
#43
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/03 05:35:33 (permalink)
fitzj


I have read so much about pro-tools  for windows but compared to sonar pricing they charge crazy prices.
You purchase pro-tools nine but quickly you find that you need the expansion kit that give you beat Detective for stereo tracks plus you only get 1 instance without this expansion kit.
In the uk this will set you back pro-tools 9 with Vat £499.00
Extension pak £1499 - 1699 plus vat.
Pretty expensive when you count it all up compared to Sonar

add also that Pro Tools really sucks, no 64bit support its outdate and old, hardly work and you have big troubles just install it on Windows 7 x64 makes it even more hilarious.
 
Trust me Pro Tools has nothing to offer, infact much less.
 
You get more functionality with SONAR X1, Cubase, Nuendo, Logic, Samplitude, Studio One, Reaper...etc... Pro Tools are just overrated. Some still continue use it, not because its good, because they have invest a lot of money into this garbage TDM and so forth. That's the truth. Still majority of the big studios has shift their workplatform and use Cubase, Logic, Sonar X1,Sequoia and Samplitude instead. All modern DAWs are in full x64bit support. Some still continue to use their outdate Pro Tools HD system for tracking but later on, all real work is done in other DAWs that do support x64.


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
#44
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/03 05:44:31 (permalink)
Mod Bod


fitzj


I have read so much about pro-tools  for windows but compared to sonar pricing they charge crazy prices.
You purchase pro-tools nine but quickly you find that you need the expansion kit that give you beat Detective for stereo tracks plus you only get 1 instance without this expansion kit.
In the uk this will set you back pro-tools 9 with Vat £499.00
Extension pak £1499 - 1699 plus vat.
Pretty expensive when you count it all up compared to Sonar

Looks like Pro Tools 10 takes care of that.  Here's a bullet point:
 
" Multitrack Beat Detective and Elastic Audio let you correct timing across all of your tracks "

This is a good thread for me because I have an iLok on the way so that I can run the demo for PT 10.   I am definitely interested in the gotchas that might appear.
 
 
So should we get impressed now?..... There are no bullet...
 
Today all DAWs can do that. Pro Tools were once again last to implemented it.
 
SONAR X1 has it and it sound 10 times better then Pro Tools engine. Sonar have had it for over 6 years now, izotope algorithm. Cubase have had it too for I don't know how long..Studio One has the best algorithm though, Celemony Melodyne.  
 
By the way, elastic audio on Pro tools are not so good and their algorithm sounds worse compare to other DAWs on the market. 
A good example where Pro Tools finish last.........again....  
post edited by Freddie H - 2012/06/03 12:28:04


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
#45
TraceyStudios
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 603
  • Joined: 2005/10/13 12:40:33
  • Location: Chandler, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re:Pro-tools vs SonarX1 2012/06/03 14:50:16 (permalink)
Coke and Pepsi!! They both are pretty much the same, may do things a little differrent. Much more bang for the buck with Sonar.


AMD FX-6100 six-core processor 3.3GHz
8 Gig RAM
SONAR X3 Producer
Tascam FW1884
Mackie Blackbird
Presonus Digimax
Avalon U5
BFD2
SL Trigger
Alesis DM8 Pro drums
KRK Rokit 8s
KRK 10s
ARC2

Folgers Dark Roast, a bit of crazy :)
& lots of help from the forums!
 
http://www.reverbnation.com/blakkmire
#46
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1