chdude3
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4
- Joined: 2005/06/14 08:47:27
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/14 12:01:22
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: losguy Is your audio card M-Audio by chance? If so, there's little that can be done, short of using IDE for audio as you are doing now, or using an external USB2/FW drive for audio. Yes - it's a bit buried in my post, but I'm using a Delta66. External drive isn't a preferred option at this point, as the SATA drive is currently my system drive (where Windows etc is installed). It would require basically rebuilding the system right now, which is not an option I'd relish. You can also do what Lliam did (see his posts on the last couple pages) and swap out your MOBO to the ASUS A7V880. Again, I'd prefer not to have to tear down, rebuild, and reinstall. If your audio card is PCI, then I would not recommend a PCI card-based SATA adapter for you, since any PCI slot-bus solution could contend with the audio card. It really comes down to the adapter hardware and how the driver for the adapter is written. I think that sticking with something newer from Promise might be a good bet, but I'd have to research further into it. It would be nice to be able to support the NCQ available on my Seagate SATA drive. Instead, as a sort of stop-gap, you could use this IDE-to-SATA adapter from StarTech that Lliam pointed out above. IMO it would be a better solution, as it would provide SATA ports that also bypass the PCI slot bus. That is a possibility, but for the cost it would only be marginally more expensive to get a PCI SATA controller. Incidentally, for Canadians, the same item can be found for less at MyCableShop. Curious... did you find other forum threads that provided alternate solutions, or did they just further point out the problem? It was this thread. Oh, and to clarify - this system was always intended to have a second hard drive in it. There's the SATA drive I use for the system drive, and a second drive which is IDE which I'm using for bulk storage. When I use that IDE drive for audio data in Sonar, I haven't heard a pop/click yet. Just that occasionally, when playing MP3s or even video files from the SATA drive (in Windows Media Player, WinAmp, what have you), I get some pops or stuttering. So while I'm ok for Sonar so far, I'd still like to clear the problem up as it is affecting the rest of the system. Games have stuttered as well.
post edited by chdude3 - 2005/06/14 12:08:35
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/14 15:15:19
(permalink)
I think I got my signals a little crossed on your situation. I was thinking you were looking for SATA audio for SONAR. I see now that is not the case; sorry for any confusion. Good luck with your SATA system drive. BTW, you probably already knew this, but just in case someone reading this didn't, I am Blue Screen over on the SOS forums.
|
chdude3
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4
- Joined: 2005/06/14 08:47:27
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/14 16:00:24
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: losguy I think I got my signals a little crossed on your situation. I was thinking you were looking for SATA audio for SONAR. I see now that is not the case; sorry for any confusion. Don't get me wrong - I'd like to get the SATA working so that I could use it with SONAR. I want to reclaim SATA for audio like you did! :) An acceptable alternative for now is to use the secondary drive. I'm trying to decide between that StarTech device, and an add-in card. I can't find much information about the StarTech PATA2SATA device, I don't know what kind of overhead the translation incurs and whether it's going to have an effect on data throughput.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/14 22:10:49
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: chdude3 Don't get me wrong - I'd like to get the SATA working so that I could use it with SONAR. I want to reclaim SATA for audio like you did! :) ... An acceptable alternative for now is to use the secondary drive. Actually, having a second drive dedicated to audio data (besides a primary drive for OS & apps) is the preferred configuration. Even if the audio drive is IDE, it's better than sharing everything on a single drive, SATA or not. So unless you're looking at another SATA drive, or swapping your current drive configuration, you may already be at the ideal point, amigo. I'm trying to decide between that StarTech device, and an add-in card. I can't find much information about the StarTech PATA2SATA device, I don't know what kind of overhead the translation incurs and whether it's going to have an effect on data throughput. It would be conjecture on my part, but I suspect that the biggest bottleneck would be in the PATA interface. Actually, I take that back... it would be the physical drive itself. Most modern 7200 rpm drives can't get much above 35MBps sustained throughput... if even that. This limitation is true of PATA or SATA drives, so in that sense the interface speed is completely irrelevant (for now). Access-time transients are a different phenomenon, of course, but a decent drive cache can take up a lot of that slack, too.
|
chdude3
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4
- Joined: 2005/06/14 08:47:27
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/15 07:54:03
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: losguy So unless you're looking at another SATA drive, or swapping your current drive configuration, you may already be at the ideal point, amigo. I had actually originally intended to go with two SATA drives, and for now I'm definitely glad that I did not! I may just leave things as they are, since they seem to be working (knock on wood). I seem to have cleaned up the stutters for other applications, so it looks like I may be OK. This limitation is true of PATA or SATA drives, so in that sense the interface speed is completely irrelevant (for now). Access-time transients are a different phenomenon, of course, but a decent drive cache can take up a lot of that slack, too. You are bang on with that. Physically, there is no PATA or SATA drive that's capable of saturating the currently available bandwidth. It's humourous to see that the next SATA spec will be for 300MB/s when we're not even pushing poor old ATA/133!
|
shmuckboy
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9
- Joined: 2005/06/14 22:30:18
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/15 21:15:35
(permalink)
........Alright.........Thank you first off for your willingness to help I see nothing on powerstrip about latency timing whatsoever. All I have managed to do so far is make it so that my screen no longer responds. Please help me first get it so that my screen comes back. please help.......... Kyle
|
shmuckboy
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9
- Joined: 2005/06/14 22:30:18
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/15 21:18:19
(permalink)
screen is back............... now back to the original problem of PCI LATENCY.
post edited by shmuckboy - 2005/06/15 21:40:00
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/15 21:57:53
(permalink)
shmuck, look on Page 15 of this thread, about the middle of the page. You'll find what you're looking for there.
|
shmuckboy
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9
- Joined: 2005/06/14 22:30:18
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/15 22:49:28
(permalink)
Thank You! Beautiful......................alright..................hmmmmmmmm......... No changes. All latency settings WERE at 32. I have since changed the firewire set-up to 88 and all the others along the lines of your setup back from page 1. Please excuse my ignorance, but when you speak of IRQ issues, is the number 17 bad? It's a dedicated 1394 firewire in the back, not an add on if that helps.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/16 00:44:55
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: shmuckboy Please excuse my ignorance, but when you speak of IRQ issues, is the number 17 bad? Not really worse than any other. The main thing is that your audio device should not share an IRQ with anything else. If your audio device talks through Firewire, then the Firewire should not share an IRQ with anything else.
|
shmuckboy
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9
- Joined: 2005/06/14 22:30:18
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/17 22:04:34
(permalink)
The firewire should not share an Interupt request except for the port it is plugged into correct? Cool. I'm ok there, would the order of irq jack something up?
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/18 12:08:03
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: shmuckboy The firewire should not share an Interupt request except for the port it is plugged into correct? Cool. I'm ok there, would the order of irq jack something up? Not on modern MOBOs. They have a device called an APIC (advanced programmable interrupt controller) which provides for mapping of IRQs higher than 16. Since you have an IRQ 17, you must have an APIC. Priority order used to be a big deal, but most of the devices at the lower IRQs (higher priority) are not resource-intensive. If you're worried, you can always disable them in the BIOS. (For the most part, people don't miss COM ports or LPT ports... unless they have a dongle that they need to keep happy.) I do get peeved that as part of the Windows Plug&Play initiative, the ACPI specification ( Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) took out even the option of manually controlling which devices get mapped to what IRQ. For the most part, if you're careful about slot assignments and such, ACPI maps things pretty well. But sometimes it does an abysmal job. In that case you do have other options but IMO they are a step backward, and should be completely unneccesary with proper design. If they would have just given users the option to control the APIC through a manual override, it really would have been the best of both worlds. Edit: P.S. If anyone knows of a hack or a utility (or both) to perform this override, let me know!! If any of you developers out there know how to get hooks into this, let's talk.
post edited by losguy - 2005/06/18 12:12:56
|
shmuckboy
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9
- Joined: 2005/06/14 22:30:18
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/23 21:10:56
(permalink)
Alright......I have yet to see any improvement. Any reccomendations? I've just about exhausted any help from guitar center employees. I've even had them come over to my house to try and go through it.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/06/24 00:11:26
(permalink)
Sorry Mr. schmuck, but I will need to know more about your situation before I could offer any help. First off, you need to explain exactly what your problem with your machine is. Then give some details about your machine. That'll work for a start.
|
damballah
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8
- Joined: 2005/05/23 06:24:11
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/04 06:07:00
(permalink)
Hello My MOBO is a Asus A7V8X V(ia KT400) and my sound card is MOTU 828 Mk2 (Firewire through PCI adaptor) I have those clicks and pops, glitchesv problems while recording audio USING DDAWG OR WPCRE and adjusting PCi LATENCY TIMER I haven't noticed any consistent improvement except once where I record 3 hours of audio at 24/ 96Khz with the purest sound I've ever heard on my PC (Thanks Motu although they could warn that their MOTU is not Compatible with all PC /MOBO so not 100%) Unfortunately I haven't been able since to reproduce the magical settings or combination of actions that fixed (till next reboot) my audio problem Any idea?? My config PC: AMD 2000+ RAM: 512 DDR2700 SAMSUNG HDD: 2* UDMA 5,6 120 GO OS: WIN XP PRO TI-based FW Adapter CUBASE SX 2.2
|
nromanel
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2005/07/27 22:10:30
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/27 22:12:14
(permalink)
Wow... the topic I've been looking for But after following for a few pages I'm confused. Yes I have an asus A7N8X-E Deluxe board and I'm using the Onboard Sil3112 Controller with two seagate barracudas. If i get myself a promise or highpoint raid card, will my pops and clicks vanish? Or is there still a good chance I'll have a problem? Thanks,
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/28 10:42:40
(permalink)
Nick, what soundcard are you using? If it's not M-Audio, then you ought to try a PCI Latency utility first. If it is M-Audio, then AFAIK you'll have no joy with the onboard SiI SATA controller. In the latter case, you may or may not have luck with a PCI-card Promise controller, so it's a gamble (but worth it if you want SATA RAID). Edit: Please also tell what video card you have. Blesings,
post edited by losguy - 2005/07/28 10:54:41
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/28 10:49:26
(permalink)
damballah, sorry for not replying sooner. Somehow the automatic email notification form the forum got buried. In case you're still watching, 1) Make sure your audio interface does not share any interrupts. Take care of this before you mess with PCI latency. (Next time, please tell what you audio interface is.) 2) If you still have clicks/pops, return your PCI latency timers back to their default values, then try raising your audio card / lowering your video card. But if you have a Matrox card, it's probably already low. (Next time. please tell what your video card is.) Blessings,
|
nromanel
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2005/07/27 22:10:30
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/28 11:29:02
(permalink)
Thanks for your reply losguy. I should've been clearer. I am using a Delta 44 with an ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 9600 Video card. So, if I want to use SATA Raid.... I'm taking my chances with a PCI Controller, it may or may not work? Oh Maudio... fix this!!!! lol Thanks again for your help losguy
post edited by nromanel - 2005/07/28 11:34:15
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/28 12:58:24
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: nromanel Thanks for your reply losguy. I should've been clearer. I am using a Delta 44 with an ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 9600 Video card. So, if I want to use SATA Raid.... I'm taking my chances with a PCI Controller, it may or may not work? Oh Maudio... fix this!!!! lol Thanks again for your help losguy No problem, you're welcome. If you want to follow the saga, the topic of M-Audio and SiI SATA was (dis)covered in this thread. I haven't heard any news on it since. As far as options, you can: 1) Take your chances on a Promise card 2) Go non-raid and get an IDE-SATA adapter for your SATA drives (see this thread a few pages back) 3) Get the new ASUS VIA MOBO for your Athlon with chipset-native SATA (see this thread, within the last couple of pages) 4) Upgrade to AMD64 Blessings,
|
nromanel
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2005/07/27 22:10:30
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/28 13:32:29
(permalink)
Hey Losguy, thought I'd give you an update. I'm able to return my HD's, and I'm going to use that money to get two IDE drives and RAID Controller. Thanks for all your help... GB!
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/07/28 14:16:01
(permalink)
That may put you right back where you started. The problem is not with SATA specifically, but rather with the onboard disk controller sitting on the PCI bus. Getting a PCI RAID card does essentially the same thing. The upshot of using a controller card is that it also allows you to try different drivers and chipsets, just by changing out the card. But before swinging for this, I would first ask around to make sure I had a controller card that worked with your Delta card. Most of all, if I were in your shoes, I would think hard about the new VIA chipset MOBO. It's more trouble to swap, of course, but it's about 80 bucks and it works with SATA.
|
Parasite
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8
- Joined: 2005/02/12 16:25:54
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/09/17 05:09:25
(permalink)
Maybe someone already mentioned this, but for people with ATI radeon videocards: it might help if you switch from the standard catalyst drivers to Omega drivers ( www.omegadrivers.net) These drivers were build on the standard Catalyst drivers, but they're more stable, and they take over the PCI latency setting from the bios. My videocard went from 255 latency (standard drivers) to 64 (omega drivers)! And without having to use a latency tool. Solved a lot of my problems... My system: Asus p4p800e deluxe Pentium 4 3.2ghz Northwood 2gig corsair mem 2x maxtor PATA 2x WD raptor SATA Layla24 ATI Radeon 7500 cheers, Parasite
post edited by Parasite - 2005/09/17 05:17:33
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/09/19 19:24:48
(permalink)
Thanks for the info, Steven. This is nice to know for anyone looking for alternatives to the ATI Catalyst set. However, note that video cards are not the only source of PCI latency issues (they're just usually the worst and most-likely offenders). For the record, it's really not all that hard to install and learn how to use a good PCI latency tool. That's because by the time that one should properly be touching PCI latency settings, one should already be familiar with so many other things already (things like IRQ conflict resolution, driver updates, etc.). Regarding Catalyst, I can't recall if I said it in this thread or not, so I'll say it here: For a DAW, doing the full ATI Catalyst install is *not* recommended. Download the driver file set to a folder first, then use the Install Hardware wizard. When it asks to scan for the file, say No, and just point the wizard to the actual display driver file for the card (Browse and dig down to the sub-folder that contains the valid driver file). If you have already installed all of Catalyst (including Hydravision, which is crapware for a DAW), then it's best to first Uninstall the drivers, and then start over at the top of this paragraph. Cheers and Blessings to one and all...
|
soundsubs
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 496
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:28:52
- Location: denver
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/10/21 13:03:28
(permalink)
What an amazing and thorough post, and thanks for that. I didnt even realize this was almost 2 years old now! i think i have read most of the issues. Heres my situation. I just got a new Dell Poweredge SC430 with a dual core Pentium. really really great on the capabilities and power, but of course i opted for the SATA drives. i have 2 pci audio cards--- one is the echo layla 20, and one the newer emu 0404. early yesterday, i installed the emu and realized it wasnt popping or clicking. duh, this must point to an irq conflict. so i swapped the echo and emu, and the popping followed the echo--- even tho the irq's changed. so i stumble onto your post, thought id share here. following your advice, i researched and downloaded a few pci latency programs, but none of them helped. all the things in my system seem to be at 0 latency, with the exception of the emu (at 64) and the layla (at 192). i adjusted them up, down, and sideways, rebooted, sometimes with a low enough latency, playing audio through the layla just locks it up. nothing has helped. i am using the onboard graphics card until i can buy a dual head (the dell didnt come with an agp slot) still researching though. its weird, it seems that when the graphics is "doing something" the layla chokes. in sonar, its fine until i grab a track window and move it up and down furiously--- then the popping starts. i have searched microsofts db for it, they had a ton of interesting stuff, none of which really helped. the other weird anomaly is that recording seems flawless, whether digital or analog, doesnt matter. system: dell sc430 pentium d (dual core)@ 2.8 windows 2003 server 1 gb ram 2 SATA drives
|
digipenguin
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 557
- Joined: 2003/12/01 15:42:06
- Location: St. Louis
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/10/21 14:46:23
(permalink)
Is this thread still Going? OMG! Let it die! Start a new thread.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/10/21 16:08:11
(permalink)
soundsubs, you might want to play with Hardware Acceleration on your vide to see if that makes a difference. I can't tell from the Dell website if the onboard graphics are PCI-e or AGP, but if you can't adjust the PCI latency for the graphics, you're kinda stuck for tweaking. If you do get a PCI dual-head graphics card, I recommend the Matrox P650. It comes out of the box with good PCI latency values. Also, check that the Dell BIOS lets you completely disable the onboard graphics adapter. That would be the best situation. Otherwise, you can Disable it in Windows Device Manager, but it's not quite as clean that way.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/10/21 16:13:31
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: digipenguin Is this thread still Going? OMG! Let it die! Start a new thread. digi, sorry that this thread is too old for you. Maybe once every device manufacturer (including audio card manufacturers) switch over to PCIe and properly adopt the MSI event/packet-based model, we'll be able to say goodbye once and for all to IRQs and bus contention, and this thread can rest peacefuly.
|
digipenguin
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 557
- Joined: 2003/12/01 15:42:06
- Location: St. Louis
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/10/21 16:29:18
(permalink)
It just seems strange that a topic such as this can still be going after 2 years. Technilogy has changed so dramatically.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2005/10/21 17:25:01
(permalink)
You're right, it has. Keep in mind, though that nForce2 boards and SiI controllers are still around. The material on IRQ's and interpreting PCI IRQ tables is certainly still pertinent, though interspersed through the pages a quite bit. (And the current crop of PCIe is just a bad dream for DAWs. But there are already other threads for that.)
|