FredrikGroth76
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 285
- Joined: 2004/08/25 16:23:11
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/11/16 06:39:41
(permalink)
Thanks man! I'm up and running now, and so far everything seems fine! Better than fine actually!  This machine is sooooooo fast!!!!
|
Hunter
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 46
- Joined: 2005/03/26 13:07:01
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/05 16:14:58
(permalink)
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/05 19:07:15
(permalink)
|
filOSfR
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2006/10/28 04:20:43
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/06 11:42:45
(permalink)
losguy!!! man, i know you put this thread up AGES ago... and this board is way old now... but being a student and having just come back from living overseas, i came back to my PC built off the A7N8X-Deluxe board and googled "sound crackle a7nx8 deluxe" and two results came up, this being the first... and awesome!!! im so happy, my old hoontech dsp24 mkii soundcard was about to get thrown out as i thought it was that, but i read briefly elsewhere that someone else had problems with crackle which gave me my google search term... its too late in the night/morning to fully test it, but so far so good!!! life saver mate!! now all i need to figure out is a quick and easy way to shield my monitor speakers from my screen as i just purchased a cheap pair of studio monitors which sound alot better than what i was using before, but they dont appear to be magnetically sheilded... i hope to find a way to maybe stick something on the sides of them to prevent the magnetic field effecting the monitor... any suggestions seeing as you are the king? once again... thanks heaps...!!! dan.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/07 01:06:50
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: filOSfR ...so far so good!!! life saver mate!! Great. Hope it works out for you. now all i need to figure out is a quick and easy way to shield my monitor speakers from my screen as i just purchased a cheap pair of studio monitors which sound alot better than what i was using before, but they dont appear to be magnetically sheilded... i hope to find a way to maybe stick something on the sides of them to prevent the magnetic field effecting the monitor... any suggestions ... Magnetic shielding of speaker magnets is a bit harder to do 'outside the box' than right at the magnet. They do it by surrounding the magnet structure of the speaker with mu-metal (very magnetic metal) to direct & encase the magnetic field lines. You might try getting a plate of magnetic metal to put between the monitor speakers and the video monitors. If you can bend the plate around the sides of the speaker, that's better, and if you can make a 'clamshell' around your monitor speaker, even better (just not on the front!). Best would be to open the monitor box and slap mu-metal all over the woofer's magnet. Here are a couple of sources for mu metal: http://www.magnetic-shield.com/ http://www.lessemf.com/mag-shld.html But just for starters, you could just go down to your local metal bending shop and ask for a plate of iron (or non-stainless steel). They could maybe even bend it to the dimensions of your speakers. A U-shaped plate along the top, bottom, and side of the speakers should do a lot. Of course, the side of the speaker should be the one closest to the video monitor. Good luck! P.S. ... seeing as you are the king? Just to clarify, Jesus is the King. (Hey, Elvis used to stop the crowd when they would chant 'You're the king', and set them straight. If Elvis humself did that, then by golly, I'd better too!!) Blessings...
post edited by losguy - 2006/12/07 01:26:14
|
illin_noise
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 39
- Joined: 2004/01/07 18:11:47
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/14 05:06:26
(permalink)
Hi Everyone, I see that the focus on this thread has been incompatibilities between M-audio products and Si SATA controllers. I'm observing similar issues on my new system. Intel E6600 (core 2 duo @2.4GHz) 2GB DDR-800 Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 (rev. 1.0) Seagate 7200.10 SATA2 200GB system drive Pair of Seagate 7200.10 SATA2 500GB in a RAID0 Radeon 1300 PCI-E Delta 1010LT The 1010LT has its own IRQ (20). So I've only been having problems in Sonar, as opposed to Reason or SoundForge. I experimented w/ increased latencies, which ruined my beloved input-monitoring. Further experimentation revealed that an identical project can run at 1ms Latency and no crackles from my system drive, but required 17ms (768 samples @ 44khz) from my RAID drive. From this it appears that the chipset integrated SATA controllers are fine. Has anyone had any positive/negative experiences with Gigabyte's SATA2 controller? Edit: Great job everyone (losguy!) in your debugging of this very annoying problem.
post edited by illin_noise - 2006/12/14 05:25:54
|
tecton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 575
- Joined: 2005/03/07 07:34:07
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/14 11:30:38
(permalink)
illin_noise, Plug your OS drive in to the Purple SATA2 connectors and your Audio/RAID Drives into the Yellow SATA2 connectors.
post edited by tecton - 2006/12/14 12:11:58
|
illin_noise
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 39
- Joined: 2004/01/07 18:11:47
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/14 12:01:50
(permalink)
Hi Tecton, nice sig. I believe those purple connectors are the only ones to support RAID on the motherboard. Do you use it this way? Thanks, Charles
|
tecton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 575
- Joined: 2005/03/07 07:34:07
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/14 12:35:47
(permalink)
Looks like your are right, sorry I only use the GA-965P-DQ6 which allows for this. There will be another way around it.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/15 13:25:36
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: illin_noise I see that the focus on this thread has been incompatibilities between M-audio products and Si SATA controllers. I'm observing similar issues on my new system. ... Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 (rev. 1.0) ...an identical project can run at 1ms Latency and no crackles from my system drive, but required 17ms (768 samples @ 44khz) from my RAID drive. ... From this it appears that the chipset integrated SATA controllers are fine. Has anyone had any positive/negative experiences with Gigabyte's SATA2 controller? Hey illini, sorry to hear about this trouble. This is an interesting board, I must say, in that RAID is only supported with a non-integrated SATA controller. First time I've seen an outboard SATA controller chip branded with a MOBO maker's mark. Up to now, it's been SiI and Promise. I ownder if Gigabyte just licensed the SiI hardware and slapped their logo on it. Anyway, since your system is PCIe, there's unfortunately little if anything that can be done. TTBOMK no tool is yet available to throttle traffic on the PCIe bus. So, you're at the mercy of driver and/or BIOS updates to get a real fix for this. A workaround would be to abandon RAID 0 and/or move your SATA audio drives off of ports GSATAII0-1 and onto one of the four ports SATAII0-3. Another workaround may be to try a different audio interface. Sorry that neither option is easy. If you absolutely must have RAID 0 (which for audio applications is most likely unnecessary), another option still could be to try a Promise PCI or PCIe SATA controller card. I say 'try', because it's no guarantee. Blessings, and good luck!
|
tecton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 575
- Joined: 2005/03/07 07:34:07
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/15 17:10:14
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: losguy I wonder if Gigabyte just licensed the SiI hardware and slapped their logo on it. This is what I also suspect, but have not looked into. ORIGINAL: losguy A workaround would be to abandon RAID 0 and/or move your SATA audio drives off of ports GSATAII0-1 and onto one of the four ports SATAII0-3. If you absolutely must have RAID 0 (which for audio applications is most likely unnecessary), These are also my thoughts exactly. Every new DAW I build I try (usually in vain) to talk the person out of a RAID 0 setup. 1. With SATA 2 3Gig transfer it is not necessary unless you are wanting to play back 200 tracks or more. 2. If the slightest thing goes wrong with the RAID, that’s it, all data gone. You can't rebuild a striped RAID. So the 'performance boost' offered by this hard drive arrangement is usually not needed and also usually not ever used and you potentially increase your chances many times over for total loss of all your precious work, yippee!
|
illin_noise
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 39
- Joined: 2004/01/07 18:11:47
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/15 19:17:52
(permalink)
Hey illini, sorry to hear about this trouble. This is an interesting board, I must say, in that RAID is only supported with a non-integrated SATA controller. First time I've seen an outboard SATA controller chip branded with a MOBO maker's mark. Up to now, it's been SiI and Promise. I ownder if Gigabyte just licensed the SiI hardware and slapped their logo on it. Windows detects it as "IRQ 19 GIGABYTE GBB36X Controller". I've tried moving my sound card to different PCI slots which didn't help. It already had it's own IRQ. Tried disabling the other hardware shared w/ the GBB36X, but that didn't have any obvious effect on the clicking and pop-locking. If you absolutely must have RAID 0 (which for audio applications is most likely unnecessary), another option still could be to try a Promise PCI or PCIe SATA controller card. I say 'try', because it's no guarantee. I think I'll try a PCIe SATA Raid card. Wouldn't want to rip out the mobo OR buy a new audio interface. Kinda sucks though. At least for now, I have plenty of free space on my system drive to work from until a solution is found. 1. With SATA 2 3Gig transfer it is not necessary unless you are wanting to play back 200 tracks or more. I decided on RAID0 to maximize track number and therefore provide for a higher level of "futureproof-ness" (yes I made that word up) wrt higher sample rates. I currently record everything at 16/44k but may eventually graduate to 24/96k. 2. If the slightest thing goes wrong with the RAID, that’s it, all data gone. You can't rebuild a striped RAID. I regularly backup my data to a network drive to cover drive failure. FWIW, I do see increased "performance" from my RAID array, but it "sounds" like CRAP  Thanks for the feedback!
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/15 19:25:16
(permalink)
Yoiu're basically right on, tecton. One fine point I could add is that even with the fastest modern SATAII drives, streaming audio data rates will still primarily be limited by the sustained transfer rate of the HDD. This is limited mechanically by the rotation rate of the platter(s), and by the linear density of the magnetic pulses on the platter (in bits/mm linear or bits/radian angular). With the new vertical stacking disks, this number could go up, but the last numbers I clocked were around 35-40 MB / sec (a couple of years ago on a Seagate Barracuda @ 7200 RPM). That's still plenty of overhead for tracks (over 250 mono tracks at 44.1/24, using the average sustained rate). Really, the only reasons for going RAID 0 for audio are: 1) gobs of tracks at 96/24 rates or higher, and 2) faster bouncing/freezing or buffer copies when switching to external audio editors.
|
ambientNRG
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 94
- Joined: 2004/09/08 15:20:57
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/19 15:15:32
(permalink)
It may be already mentioned in this thread but IRQ 1-16 are standard IRQs and beyond that, its all virtual. They are not maintained in the BIOS but virtually in the windows. Its better if audio card is in 1-16 IRQ.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2006/12/19 16:32:11
(permalink)
In the base hardware, dealing with the old PIC, what you say is true. However, modern MOBOs now include an APIC which supersedes the old PIC and handles the virtual IRQ routing transparently, and in practically all cases, also quite well. To take advantage of this, the APIC should be enabled in the BIOS (which is usually the default setting), and of course, Windows should be set to ACPI PC mode. The only case where this is an issue is when a system insists on having the audio interface share with something that it doesn't like (that is, either the audio interface's hardware or driver). Otherwise, IRQ's can sometimes be shared with no issues. A common remedy for PCI interfaces is to move the card to a different slot. I provide some posts earlier in this thread that help make this option less of a craps-shoot.
|
aCiD
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8
- Joined: 2006/11/11 15:42:39
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/02/03 01:44:45
(permalink)
If I keep my OS installed on my SATA drive, but have the live recording of audio go to an IDE drive, will that solve this problem. Note: Abit NF-7, Delta 1010, I have literally (LITERALLY) tried everything so far to NO avail whatsoever. All important devices have their own "real" IDE, latencies have been adjusted from here to next week, PCI slots have been switched to death, I am.... going crazy.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/02/03 12:11:13
(permalink)
I acid, sorry about your troubles. If you have the NF7-S then the SATA controller is most likely the SiI one, and that one is known to not cooperate at all with M-Audio cards, period. If you have the second-generation NF7-S2/NF7-S2G then the SATA controller is on the nForce2 Southbridge, in which case it could possibly be coaxed into working better (in theory). Putting the OS on the SATA could help the situation, but unfortunately it's not a guarantee, especially if you have the NF7-S. Windows accesses the system disk at unpredictable times, and one system access at the wrong time while recording could trigger a glitch on yoru M-Audio card. In dead-end situations (i.e. M-Audio and SiI SATA) people have had success by either going IDE all the way, or buying a $30-$50 external USB2 enclosure for their SATA drive. Those are the cheapest options that are known to work. Next comes using a Promise SATA controller card (more flexible, but not guaranteed - get it from a place that will take it back if you need to), or just getting a newer audio interface that is NOT M-Audio. Hope it works out for you, one way or the other.
|
aCiD
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8
- Joined: 2006/11/11 15:42:39
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/02/03 13:34:08
(permalink)
Oops, I completely forgot to say NF7-S..... So yes... my life is ruined :) And yes it is the Sil3112. I bought the M-Audio card yesterday with hopes and dreams of grandeur... I guess what was my recording computer, will now just become a file server. Too bad, nowadays you just can't get a mobo with 5 PCIs (That's not some expensive Tyan), and that much free space to move around.
|
aCiD
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8
- Joined: 2006/11/11 15:42:39
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/02/04 01:50:59
(permalink)
Long story short... Put my 1010 in my AMD 3800 with Gigabyte K8NF, MME, 96KHz, 16bit, works perfect. Another note, none of M-Audio's drivers existing drivers play nice with Vista and the 1010. Doesn't work, and causes many page faults, so don't even try. Thanks for all the info in this thread though!
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/02/04 10:49:08
(permalink)
Very good. Actually, just loading your M-Audio card into an nForce3 (or later) machine was not on my remedy list... but that certainly works too. I'm glad you got it sorted. Blessings...
|
Simo75
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5
- Joined: 2006/07/18 04:09:48
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/03/28 17:50:26
(permalink)
Yuppy!!! I buy a controller Raid SATA Arowana (based on silicon image 3512, only 20 euro) and now my PC is perfect for audio!! On my Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe the integrated silicon image 3112 was the killer! :P
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/03/29 13:51:06
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Simo75 Yuppy!!! I buy a controller Raid SATA Arowana (based on silicon image 3512, only 20 euro) and now my PC is perfect for audio!! On my Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe the integrated silicon image 3112 was the killer! :P Heay, that's neat. It could be that SiI has made the drivers for their newer PCI SATA controller cards more system-friendly. It sure looks that way, at least for your case.
|
seldridge1960
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1
- Joined: 2007/04/05 20:08:21
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/04/05 20:17:31
(permalink)
 Hey I would like to thank whomever is posting this thread. I recently started recording with Sonar 6 Producer edition. I also have an RME Fireface 800 and a Presonus Digimax FS. I am posting a reply because there was mention that someone would like to know if this popping and clicking was experienced with a system using SATA drives and a Firewire sound card setup. Well, that would be my system. I run an AZEUS PCB800 Deluxe motherboard, ATI RAEDON 9800 Pro, WD 320 Gig SATA drive. Note I am not using the on board AC87 sound card that comes with the motherboard! Up until now I was having a terrible time with pops and clicks during playback of recorded data. After reading this post I downloaded the PowerStrip utility. There must be a widespread problem with ATI RAEDON Video boards being set up for 248 for the PCI Latancy. Mine was set for 248. After changing the PCI Latancy to 88 I have not heard a POP or CLICK out of my system. I would dare say that the problem is more with the ATI Video card PCI Latancy than with anything else in my system. If you have ATI Video, and you are getting pissed off at your Sonar application, download the PowerStrip utility and check your PCI Latencies. Thanks again for the information. It saved my system from the sledghammer
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/04/05 20:57:27
(permalink)
Yup, it's true for most game-oriented AGP graphics cards, including ATI and nVidia. Glad you got it sorted.
|
Destructo
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 93
- Joined: 2003/11/18 17:22:11
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/05/08 21:42:20
(permalink)
I have a fireface 800 also, and am getting a few pops and clicks in some situations, like with arturia synths when the GUI is on screen. Leading me to think it might be a problem with the graphics cards. My machine was originally for gaming, so it has dual nvidia geforce 7900 gts running sli. It's PCIe, so am I right in thinking there's nothing I can do about PCI latency?
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/05/08 23:19:30
(permalink)
That's right. Some second-generation PCIe MOBOs with BIOS updates got it sorted out, but IIUC you still have to be careful with what graphics cards you use. Maybe third or fourth generation PCIe will be implemented in a way that actually provides control over messaging priority, say, through a utility like PowerStrip, but I haven't seen anything yet.
|
Destructo
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 93
- Joined: 2003/11/18 17:22:11
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/05/09 09:44:48
(permalink)
Thanks losguy. Any thoughts on which PCIe video card to get? Though that may have been discussed elsewhere already
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2007/05/09 11:46:03
(permalink)
Yes, it has. IIRC, a low-end graphics card helps the problem, but does not solve it. However, I did dig up these threads: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=992704 http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=748119 Scott @ ADK (jcschild on the CW forum) is the reigning authority on the issue. He found that using a PCIe Firewire card practically solves the issue. Since you're using a Fireface, this could be your answer. That is, unless you're already using such a card.
|
dion80
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2008/03/23 14:46:06
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2008/03/23 15:02:08
(permalink)
i am experiencing similar problems with M audio Audiophile and Sil3112 sata drivers and would like to know if there is a cure with this configuration or is it best just to upgrade a part of my system ie new soundcard mobo etc Athlon +2600 1G RAM Asus A7N8X 2.0 Deluxe Maudio 2496 Audiophile Hitachi 500G SataII RAID 0 config (no 2nd sata drive) NVIDIA 5700FX I have updated soundcard,mobo, and sata drivers (1.0.60.0) and tried every PCI slot to no avail. Is it a bus latency problem? Did anybody out there ever get this problem sorted? Any help would be much appreciated.... S
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2008/03/23 21:07:44
(permalink)
Wow, this thread just keeps springing back to life, sort of like the dandelions in the spring. Hey dion80, I'm the OP.  So, you're coaxing audio out of an A7N8X, eh? Sorry you got painted into that M-Audio+SATA corner. Unfortunately, I have never heard of a fix for this combination of hardware. It appears to be a hardware or driver conflict between the SiI controller and the M-Audio card. So far, the only successful way that I have seen to break the tangle, and still keep you SATA drive, is to either put the SATA drive on another controller (either move it to an external USB2 or FW enclosure, or get a SATA controller card) or use another MOBO. As you may see from the later posts to this thread, going the SATA controller card route may result in higher performance and good results on this MOBO. (Not that FW or USB2 couldn't be workable solutions.) Yeah, the venerable A7N8X Deluxe. I have lots of memories with that MOBO... a whole range of them, let me tell you. But there were some good music-making moments with it too, to be sure. You know, I still have that MOBO, but it's now being used by my younger son in a gaming machine... it was just recently handed down to him from my older son, also using it for gaming. So, it's been having a long and productive life! But it hasn't seen a pro audio card or a SATA drive for years now. I wish you blessings and good fortune with your configuration efforts.
|