spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
You'll never believe this! So I was tracking vocals today, and I noticed in my headphones the mic was picking up A LOT of the room. I don't know how the heck I've missed this before. I was using a RODE NT1A which I haven't tracked my own vocals with before, so maybe that was part of it. Anyway, I have been thinking of getting some kind of reflexion filter or building something, but really hadn't been motivated because most of the vocals I track here sound great. Maybe today I was just being picker than usual, dunno. So, I was thinking, I wonder what would happen if I could sort of isolate the mic from the room, I wonder if some sort of filter would work? So I grabbed a piece of cardboard and said "check check" into the mic, moving the cardboard back and forth behind the mic. WOW. Each time I put the cardboard behind the mic, it was like my voice became louder and more focused. Not perfect, but better! I then decided to get creative. This is what I came up with: Now, obviously, it's ugly as sin. However, I tracked vocals using this and WOW, it's like NIGHT AND DAY. Tomorrow, I'm going to Hobby Lobby, the thrift store, and the hardware store to see about building something similar but that looks totally pro. I have seen other ideas on here as well but we'll see what I can come up with. It's amazing, that something so rigged and obviously "ghetto" could produce such superior vocals! I will post samples of the before and after. You will be absolutely amazed at my basement box reflexion filter! LOL! I guess whenever I read professional recordists telling everyone to be creative and just try things is TRULY sage advice!! More on this later.....
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 05:36:14
(permalink)
Your voice is probably sounding louder due to reflections bouncing off your cardboard and back into the mic capsule. You might also notice some comb filtering if you listen really carefully
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 05:47:22
(permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey Your voice is probably sounding louder due to reflections bouncing off your cardboard and back into the mic capsule. I was thinking the same... Reflexion filters have a carpet-like filler. The easy test. Forget the mic, stick yer head in it and talk. If it sounds "dead" it's working, if it sounds like you have your head in a cardboard box... well... you have your head in a cardboard box...
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 06:14:30
(permalink)
Dude. You so got to make an egg carton one. That would be hilarious. Bring back the egg carton! Show that it CAN actually be useful in the studio!!!
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 06:15:46
(permalink)
What do you think of the NT1A? I've thought they are ok, but nothing super special.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 06:47:23
(permalink)
Rode NTIA is a very fine microphone. I recently mastered an album that was mixed by an award winning Melbourne engineer. (Shane Omara) Mix was excellent. Turns out the performer in question used a Rode NT1A to track every instrument and all the vocals. It sounded absolutely amazing. Sounded like he had 10 of the worlds finest microphones on tap. Shane was shocked and said it totally kills the myth you need expensive microphones (and Mic Pres) to do a job well. And he was using a Fostex hard disc based recorder as the recording device with just it's on board mic pres. He is talented. Great singer and player. Just goes to show that real talent overshadows the mic by so much it does not really matter what mic you put up. Your box reflection filter could be OK but I would be a bit worried about the quality of sound bouncing around in there effecting your tone. In your case it might have really favoured your vocal sound possibly.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 07:03:32
(permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey Your voice is probably sounding louder due to reflections bouncing off your cardboard and back into the mic capsule. You might also notice some comb filtering if you listen really carefully +1 - I'm pretty sure this is exactly what you're doing with that box.
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 09:07:37
(permalink)
I think the point most are missing, is that this was a total experiment, and in no way was EVER intended to be a permanent solution.
Again, this was a total experiment!
It amazes me how quick people are to judge, and start throwing around technical jargon, without even hearing results. After all, what it sounds like is the entire point.
I will be completely rebuilding something completely different around the same principle, and yes, using something to pad the inside, probably Auralex pads.
You may feel foolish in judging after I post the samples. Stay tuned.
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 09:27:22
(permalink)
No-one is missing the point that it's an experiment, we all experiment. No-one is saying it's not making your vox sound better. You're missing the point we're making, that the reason your vox sound better isn't because your cordboard box is a good reflextion filter, it's because it is reflecting your voice back to the mic...
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 09:36:48
(permalink)
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 09:41:49
(permalink)
Sorry for the bolds and underlines. This site keeps "encountering errors" so I can't fix the HTML. 'sigh'
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 09:48:24
(permalink)
Hey Matt and Jeff, I love the NT1A. My guitarist sold me his with shock mount for $75 and I said "what the hell". It is my go to mic for recording drums as a room mic, it's pretty much my favorite mic for vocals - male AND female. I can say nothing bad about it whatsoever.
And Karen, you're right, perhaps I did miss the point, I think I may have taken it for granted that people were stating what was probably already pretty obvious.
I would be interested to hear if anyone detects the comb filtering. I do notice that it sounds less bassy. But no matter, I was able to get the vox sounding great (after a bit of comping) in the mix.
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 10:13:47
(permalink)
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 10:40:17
(permalink)
I really wouldn't expect to have significant refection coming back in from the cardboard box. Sure it'll be there, but I wouldn't think it'd be too noticeable. It very clearly cuts out much of the room sound. You do sound louder, but that could be a perception thing due to it being more dry. It also sounds very boxy, as you would expect because it's only going to be attenuating high frequencies and the low/mid stuff is going to pass right through the box. Still, the box is clearly a better result regardless. It's funny what you can use but I don't really find it that surprising. Have you ever put a sheet of paper up in between your tweeter and ear? It cuts out LOADS of highs. Why do you think the NS10's were notorious for people putting tissue over the tweater? Now we're dealing with a cardboard box! It's going to cut plenty of noticeable stuff - as your experiment has shown! I'm interested to hear how your 'more studio friendly' design sounds. See if it loses some of the boxiness. I personally think I can hear a bit of harshness (high end) in those recordings. I've noticed this same thing on my cheap mics but not my expensive ones. Does anyone agree, or is it just me? It's something I hear more and more in cheaper microphones these days. Not necessarily a problem, as long as you are aware and work around it. I find a better quality mic can safely be pushed a lot farther with strong high end boosting and harmonic exciters than cheap ones before it starts to sound bad. But then again, my mic experience is very limited, this is only on what I have experimented with.
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 10:42:03
(permalink)
Karyn No-one is missing the point that it's an experiment, we all experiment. No-one is saying it's not making your vox sound better. You're missing the point we're making, that the reason your vox sound better isn't because your cordboard box is a good reflextion filter, it's because it is reflecting your voice back to the mic... exactly. I don't think anyone responding was "judging" you for anything, Scott. so there's nothing for us to feel foolish about, no one argued with you that your vocals didn't sound better - we simply stated that there are problems with that approach. I think you're overreacting here.
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 10:52:37
(permalink)
Matt, that is all very interesting. You may be right about low/mid stuff passing right through the box, hence the "middy" / "high end" sound to the recorded result. It does also sound "boxy" (no pun intended), I wonder if it was more "breathable" if this result would diminish?
In looking at some of these reflexion filters online, some (or most) of them seem to have some sort of perforated metal at the very rear, and padding in front (on the inside facing the mic) to minimize reflections. Is this so the low end information DOES pass through? I'm thinking of the construction of my bass traps, that they are designed to allow (absorbtion) of low end frequencies by enabling them to pass through by their perforated, breathable backs. However, as Jeff pointed out, it would change your tone, especially if you were a Baritone, eh?
I was thinking of almost using some sort of plastic bucket, cut in half, design but this would prevent sound from passing through. Would this be a bad thing, even with foam lining the inside?
Thanks for the insight Matt!
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 11:14:50
(permalink)
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 11:17:03
(permalink)
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 11:18:14
(permalink)
+1 Spindlebox Excellent thread!!!!!!!!!!! I've tried it all: for vocs, guitars, drums, and other instruments. ... And if your mic is relatively cardiod, I don't see how comb-filtering reflections even becomes a factor. You're experiment proves it. You're apparently preventing other basement reflections from entering the mic's cardiod field with your shoe box. I suppose the reflections from behind you can be dampened with a curtain there or something. I'd prefer your room-set-up over Ethan Winer's clumsey reflexion filter ("portable-vocal-booth") in my 'acoustical' studio.
|
michaelhanson
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3529
- Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
- Location: Mesquite, Texas
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 11:23:48
(permalink)
In looking at some of these reflexion filters online, some (or most) of them seem to have some sort of perforated metal at the very rear, and padding in front (on the inside facing the mic) to minimize reflections. Is this so the low end information DOES pass through? I have wondered that myself. My home made reflection filter does n't currently have the holes; I've wondered how it would effect the sound to use some kind of perforated metal backing sheet with holes.
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 11:24:10
(permalink)
Hah hah. Thanks Philip.
Yes, the sound isn't perfect, but markedly improved for sure. Improvements can definitely be made, but I just can't see forking over $300 for a "professional" reflexion filter.
Good point about reflections from behind. I could also simply have the singer(s) stand with backs to my walls, which are lined with acoustic foam. That would help, or have them stand in a corner, with the point right at their back. That would prevent direct reflections.
I have nothing bad to say about Mr. Winer, he was actually very instrumental in helping me get my control room sounding good with TONS of free advice. But I do agree, I believe once I get this designed and permanently installed on my straight mic stand, it will not only be very portable, but not very bulky at all - and attractive to boot.
Still waiting for opinions on the "breathability" factor. Then I can get started. Thank you for the listen and for your thoughtful contribution.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 11:50:31
(permalink)
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 11:52:24
(permalink)
Bat: yes, I am a strong proponent of the good old fashioned moving blankets. I actually know that Ronan Chris Murphy uses those on the walls of his studio too, covered with tapestries. A lot of multi-million dollar facilities do. If it works, it works. I just want something that looks a bit nicer, having clients in my little home away from home.....
|
dlogan
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2544
- Joined: 2006/02/17 09:34:16
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 12:01:16
(permalink)
You know what I've found helps my vocal tracks? Having someone else sing them!! :) I have the NT1A and think it's a great mic for the price. Very versatile.
|
SCorey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 538
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:14
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 12:05:10
(permalink)
First of all, if it sounds good to you then that's the most important thing.
Second, I listened to both examples and in terms of raw sound I preferred the wo reflection one. It was a fuller sound, and for me it would offer more options at mixdown. The minimal room sound wouldn't be an issue for me. But again, so what? Doesn't matter what I think.
regarding comb filtering and the link that spindlebox posted. It's talking about comb filtering in the context of speaker playback in a room. That's a very different context than comb filtering in your recording. The first isn't a problem much of the time--which is what the article is saying. The second is a problem a lot of the time--which the article somewhat ignores except in the context of talking about the measurement.
Finally, mattplaysguitar brings up the harshness. Yes, both recordings were painfully piercing. I realize these are the raw recordings so I only bring it up in response to matt's asking if anyone else heard it.
|
SCorey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 538
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:14
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 12:11:07
(permalink)
Oh, yeah. One more thing re: comb filtering and that article. At the bottom there is a link to Floyd Toole's book "Sound Reproduction: Loudspeakers and Rooms". That is one of the best books out there on playback systems. It has nothing to say about recording, so it might not be everyone's cuppa tea--it's all about playback. So if you want to get serious about your playback system, then buy it and study it.
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 12:14:58
(permalink)
the box sounds brighter to me.... probably from the reflections from the box. I would line it with some foam or carpet and see what that sounds like. I'm guessing the whole point of the reflexion filter is to prevent all reflections and sound from the room from entering the mic from the sides and rear.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
spindlebox
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2645
- Joined: 2007/05/30 07:56:11
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 13:06:17
(permalink)
Interesting observations SCorey. I guess it's kind of like cooking; everyone has different taste. I don't pick up the "painfully piercing" thing. But I would rather have my recordings brighter than duller anyway. Any day of the week. Cheers!!
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 13:24:35
(permalink)
Getto recording. Love it. Put some foam inside you box to see how that effects things.
|
Rimshot
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4625
- Joined: 2010/12/09 12:51:08
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Reflexion Filter - DON'T LAUGH!!!
2012/04/05 14:26:59
(permalink)
I love the experiment. Glad you posted! Fun to read and to consider the facts. I should use something for vocals but since I haven't, if you soloed my vocal track, you would probably catch some T.V. in the backgroud or if you are lucky, my two pugs barking, snorting, getting too excited (like they always do). Rim
Rimshot Sonar Platinum 64 (Lifer), Studio One V3.5, Notion 6, Steinberg UR44, Zoom R24, Purrrfect Audio Pro Studio DAW (Case: Silent Mid Tower, Power Supply: 600w quiet, Haswell CPU: i7 4790k @ 4.4GHz (8 threads), RAM: 16GB DDR3/1600 , OS drive: 1TB HD, Audio drive: 1TB HD), Windows 10 x64 Anniversary, Equator D5 monitors, Faderport, FP8, Akai MPK261
|