Helpful ReplyRe-mastering at Abbey Road

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5139
  • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
  • Location: Ballarat, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Re-mastering at Abbey Road 2012/03/31 17:16:50 (permalink) ☄ Helpful
Some of the early AC motors that were driving the capstan used the incoming mains frequency as a reference.  I had a turntable in the 70's that was locked to the mains frequency. In Canberra where I lived the mains frequency was incredibly accurate. (Snowy Mountains Hydro setup is what Canberra uses. Some Hi Fi enthusiasts had a mains frequency digital readout!)

But in the areas where some of those early machines were used the incoming frequency may have been unstable. And voltage too. Now, a modern capstan motor gets its control from an independant circuit that is not involved with the incoming frequency of the mains. So we are playing the tapes on much more correct and stable capstan drive control. Even over a relative short time the recording speed may have drifted up and down on those early sessions. So obviously if the playback speed is very accurate, we are going to hear the recording variations as pitch tuning movements.

Using pitch is a good way to tune each section so they agree. I am lucky because I still have a massaive analog tape library including many multitracks as well as stereo masters that have yet to be transferred. They have all been made on modern accruate capstan drive control motors.

It is still nice to varispeed a multitrack session up/or down in speed and track new parts in the higher/lower tunings. When it is played back normally, the instrument takes on new sound qualities. Due to our fundementals and harmonics all moving around a little too. It is especially interesting whe you double or half the multitrack speed and track new stuff. (mandolin played down an octave sounds amazing. I think Hendrix did a bit of this)

True and accurate varispeeding would be a great feature in a DAW of course. And varispeed that can be automated and that automation recorded. This should speed up (Sorry ) the process of doing exactly what this engineer was referring to and that is corrceting for recording speed variations.

I am curious whay they did not pitch it all down to A = 440Hz. Is it because the instruments at the time were tuned to A=443 and if that was the case, then I suppose it is best to hear it played back at A= 443Hz.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2012/03/31 20:15:19

Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
 
Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
#31
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3922
  • Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
  • Location: Victoria, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Re-mastering at Abbey Road 2012/03/31 20:00:51 (permalink)
Rain

He says "in the analog where, if you're running faster, the pitch goes up". And vice versa. And that power supplies could affect the speed. 

Had he said - if you're recording faster, then, yes he'd be blatantly wrong. To me he simply took a shortcut -  if you're running something faster or slower (than it's been recorded).
Exactly.  It wouldn't make sense to talk about the pitch changing during recording anyway.  Recording doesn't change the pitch.  Only when the recording is played back at at a speed different from the one that it was recorded at does the pitch change.

SonarPlatinum(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)
FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
Having fun at work lately
#32
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1