***SONAR 8 was.... disappointing?!!***

Page: 12345.. > >> Showing page 1 of 6
Author
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 189
  • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
  • Status: offline
2008/10/30 19:14:00 (permalink)

***SONAR 8 was.... disappointing?!!***

We need some fight in this thread! I feel that there shoud have been a little more guts and a few less errors in this release.
Now tell me how dumb I am.
post edited by creynolds - 2008/11/02 20:57:06

Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
#1

150 Replies Related Threads

    cryophonik
    Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4724
    • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
    • Location: Elk Grove, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:24:45 (permalink)
    You know that we have no way of refunding your money, right? This is a peer-to-peer forum. You should take this up with Cakewalk.

    cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

    Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
    Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

    #2
    bermuda
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
    • Location: Bermuda
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:28:29 (permalink)
    No I don't feel short changed

    Channel strip plug in is fantastic, Transient Shaper is fantastic. Beatscape has it's uses, loop explorer is handy, new look is great, tube Leveller (I haven't tried yet). Dimension Pro is fantastic, audio engine is more efficient on my aging machine than sonar 6PE . Instrument tracks is what folks wanted.

    I think the upgrade was a bargain.

    What were you expecting ?

    Are you frustrated with AVID announcing 300+ job cuts ? you are pretty heavily invested in their products incl. Pro Tools.
    post edited by bermuda - 2008/10/30 19:35:48

     Yes.
    #3
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:29:03 (permalink)
    Cryophonic:
    You know that we have no way of refunding your money, right? This is a peer-to-peer forum. You should take this up with Cakewalk.


    Well I wish 'd known that before I sent off the cheque.

    creynolds:
    So I would like my money back please.


    Please destroy my cheque when it arrives.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #4
    creynolds
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 189
    • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:32:17 (permalink)
    Retracted
    post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:37:37

    Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
    #5
    jungfriend
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 746
    • Joined: 2005/06/04 00:42:15
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:47:59 (permalink)
    Did you ever think that it might be an individual problem related to your hardware and setup rather than a problem with the software?

    There are other happy users, and your post convinced me to take the plunge and buy the upgrade. I was really only waiting for the first patch, but something about the way you phrased your feeling about the technology markets and ducking and diving that feels so wrong. Cakewalk cares about its customers, and has put a great deal of effort into making their software best in class, You could always call technical support and see if they can fix some of the problems you have encountered.

    Paul

    Sonar X2 PE, ADK Core i7 920 3.6ghz 12gb, UAD-2 Quad,  2x20"+2x19" LCDs, Focal CMS 50, POD HD500, Layla 3G, PoCo mkII PCI-e, Tranzport, Edirol M-16DX, Remote SL61, Mackie MCU, NI Kore 2, NI Komplete, NI Maschine, etc.
    #6
    Dude
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 458
    • Joined: 2003/11/14 18:32:25
    • Location: San Francisco
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:49:36 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: creynolds

    Anyone else feel they have been shortchanged?



    Nope.

    I would change the subjec line.

    Dude

    Interface: TC Konnekt 24D
    PC: Intel P4 2.8C/ASUS P4C800-E/Matrox G550/1GB RAM/XP SP2
    Laptop: ThinkPad T41/TI Firewire PCMCIA Card/1GB RAM/XP SP2
    DAW: Sonar 8
    #7
    Tom F
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2749
    • Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
    • Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:49:52 (permalink)
    as i posted already i also do not believe that s8 should be 8 but it should have been a free 7.5 upgrade WITHOUT all the funny stuff (the new plugs) if i want plugs i buy plugs - btw.. there are also so many great free ones...
    so in the end i agree with you : 8 isnt that substatial imo - yet i am not taking this so hard as you do...

    ...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
    #8
    creynolds
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 189
    • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:50:04 (permalink)
    Retracted
    post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:38:37

    Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
    #9
    Lay In Wait
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1764
    • Joined: 2005/09/12 23:59:19
    • Location: Victoria B.C , Canada
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:51:00 (permalink)
    The only thing that really got to me was the completely false advertising regarding Aim Assist. The information givin said "precise editing of tracks and clips" which it did nothing of the sort. Cake then chimed in and said they were just getting started with that feature. I took that as, "it doesnt work now, but it will one day". Well then why even add it?

    Aim Assist

    Windows 7 Pro 64bit, Core i7 920, Asus p6td deluxe, Sonar X1c PE, Motu 2408 mk3, Apogee Mini DAC, 3x UAD-1, Digimax FS, Motu Microlite, MCU, Tranzport, Nocturn. And more...
    #10
    Funkybot
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 796
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:32:13
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:51:44 (permalink)
    I'm holding out for a fix to the pausing/motorboating issue. Without that fix, S8 is unusable for me. If it remains that way then I'm going to have to ask for a refund as well (and I do mean that, in this economy I can't afford to throw $100 away on something I couldn't use). I'm remaining confident that a fix is in the works though.

    Intel i7 4790k, ASUS Z97-A mobo, 16GB Kingston DDR3 RAM, Windows 10 x64,  UAD2 Duo, RME Fireface 800, Sonar X1/X2 Producer
    #11
    creynolds
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 189
    • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 19:57:08 (permalink)
    Retracted
    post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:38:52

    Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
    #12
    jinga8
    Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5817
    • Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
    • Location: Oceanside, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:00:05 (permalink)
    SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES

    I believe you may want to brush up on your common law torts...

    On a lighter note...you can see my house next to the "16" sign if you go to Birdseye View HERE...
    post edited by jinga8 - 2008/10/30 20:09:54
    #13
    creynolds
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 189
    • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 20:08:32 (permalink)
    Retracted
    post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:38:00

    Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
    #14
    Phrauge
    Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5562
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:38:29
    • Location: Texas
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SH*MBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:12:45 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: creynolds
    Anyone else feel they have been shortchanged?



    Not me.
    #15
    creynolds
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 189
    • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SH*MBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:13:27 (permalink)
    Retracted
    post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:39:35

    Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
    #16
    barlowjam
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 304
    • Joined: 2007/03/09 13:18:36
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 20:14:10 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: creynolds

    I am sorry if I offended you with my posting



    Not that hard to do on this forum!!!
    #17
    InstrEd
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1276
    • Joined: 2004/10/13 20:55:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SH*MBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:14:29 (permalink)
    Not me either.
    I'm getting better performance with my Alesis Io26 unit with Sonar 8.

    Ed
    #18
    jinga8
    Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5817
    • Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
    • Location: Oceanside, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 20:15:58 (permalink)
    Particulary if they have just produced a turkey like this ugly and oddly expensive USB control surface. We will all pay when that goes feet up.
    You seem to have very strong opinions. Great. But remember they are your opinions. Using words like "is" and "will" and "when" just shows you don't realize they are just your opinions. That's ok. We all have flaws. Even Dr. Huxtable's adorable daughter Rudy couldn't tie her shoes correctly until she was almost 9 years old! Can you believe that?
    #19
    jinga8
    Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5817
    • Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
    • Location: Oceanside, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SH*MBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:17:01 (permalink)

    Thanks for the advice. Is this any better?

    Actually, it is.
    #20
    WDI
    Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2069
    • Joined: 2007/08/28 02:31:11
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SH*MBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:18:35 (permalink)
    Original: creynolds

    Also in my experience you should keep a keen eye on companies that are taken over by large and powerful ones. The down home atitude can dissappear quite quickly. Particulary if they have just produced a turkey like this ugly and oddly expensive USB control surface. We will all pay when that goes feet up.


    I think that's just a matter of opinion. I really like the looks of the V Studio 700. And really, I think the price is pretty fair. If you piece out the system and compare it to anyone elses on the market I think you'll find the cost is right in the ball park. Besides, because it's developed by Roland/Cakewalk, the intergration should be pretty tight.

    Sonar 7 PE
    Windows XP Pofessional (SP3)
    MSI K8N Neo4-F
    AMD Athlon 64 3500+
    2 GB PC 3200 Ram
    RME Fireface 800
    Edirol FA-66
    CM Labs MotorMix

    Old stuff: ARJO
    #21
    rjt
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1017
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 10:12:44
    • Location: Portland, Oregon
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SH*MBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:29:57 (permalink)
    Sorry, have not read all the responses to the original post. While I empathize, (I have had software which does not work for me, but works well for others) I must say, Sonar 8 works well for me. My money was (reasonably) well spent. No refund here!

    Talk is cheap; supply outweighs the demand.

    Light travels faster than sound, that's why some people look bright before you hear them speak.

    Jerry Jones bought the Dallas Cowboys, Andy Reid owns them!!

    #22
    creynolds
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 189
    • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 20:31:07 (permalink)
    Retracted
    post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:39:57

    Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
    #23
    razor
    Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1557
    • Joined: 2004/05/10 16:53:27
    • Location: Irvine, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SH*MBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:39:02 (permalink)
    Love mine. Everything, including the patch, went off without a hitch.

    Stephen Davis
     
    Cakewalk by Bandlab
    Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit
    ADK DAW - (out of business 2018)
    Intel i7 4930K CPU
    Core i7 SB-E MOBO
    16 GB DDR3 RAM
    7 TB Storage
    Layla 3G SoundCard (11.5 ms Roundtrip Latency)
    UAD-2 DSP
    WaveLab 8 Pro 64-bit 
    Sound Forge 10 Pro
    #24
    space_cowboy
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9813
    • Joined: 2007/07/20 14:49:31
    • Location: Front and center behind these monitors
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:40:39 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: jinga8

    SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES

    I believe you may want to brush up on your common law torts...

    On a lighter note...you can see my house next to the "16" sign if you go to Birdseye View HERE...

    Whoa Jinga
    That is a friggin mansion. How do you get to be so fabulously well to do? I thought you did some type of counseling.

    Did you write a book like EST or How to Get Everything From Everybody? Did you make a movie? Are you selling illicit stuff?

    Congrats anyway though.

    Some people call me Maurice
     
    SPLAT Pro lifetime, ADK 6 core 3.6Ghz with 32 GB RAM, SSD 1TB system drive, 3 3TB regular drives for samples, recordings and misc.  Behringer X Touch, UAD Apollo Quad.  2 UAD2 Quads PCI (i think - inside the box whatever that is), Console 1.  More guitars (40??) and synths (hard and soft) than talent.  Zendrum!!!
    #25
    kreeper_6
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 270
    • Joined: 2005/09/29 04:01:00
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 20:45:05 (permalink)
    No problems here. Are you a NOOB?
    #26
    DaneStewart
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 717
    • Joined: 2008/02/18 13:48:58
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 21:02:57 (permalink)
    The original poster is clearly not a noob.
    The specific exact examples of behavior he describes point fairly strongly to software problems (although HW component compatibility issues always play a part)

    I hate to sound like a bastard.......BUT I AM ONE!!!!!
    I ALWAYS let you guys, the early adopters, hash out the bugs BEFORE I touch it.

    I didn't move to PE7 until it was at 7.0.2 level...and it's been just fine.
    I did the same with PE6 - not moving in until it was 6.2.4 or was it 6.4.2 ... whichever.

    So, I guess what I'm saying is: THANK YOU to all who jump right in, get all the headaches, and help the developers make the corrections. I really do appreciate you.
    ...I just don't have the time for buggy-bugs.


    To thine own self be true. ~TheDane
    #27
    b3gsus@msn.com
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1293
    • Joined: 2003/12/05 09:52:57
    • Location: Scotts Hill, North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 21:05:14 (permalink)

    Whoa Jinga
    That is a friggin mansion.
    I believe we're going to have to change his User Name to, "JingMassa"... Wildman

    Wildman,,aka,,,"Nick Danger"
    Studiocat Core2Quad Q9550 w/P45 Cset XP-Pro Sonar Pro 8, 2 FF 800, Wclock, Avalon VT-737, Focusrite V Master,Eureka, 2-LA-4s, Neumann U87,TLM-103,Rode NTK,MCU,Event SP8s, DynAudio BM5As VS-2480 4 DA88
    2-Mackie 24/8buss
    #28
    strikinglyhandsome1
    Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7224
    • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/30 21:07:15 (permalink)
    I'd quite like a refund.

    There's nothing wrong with Sonar 8 but the refund aspect appeals to me.
    #29
    kwgm
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2006/10/12 00:14:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/30 21:19:35 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: creynolds


    I don't want your money. I don't really wan't mine back to be totally honest. I want people to hear my greivance and create a movement that makes Cakewalk think about what they have done and maybe reconsider the direction they have taken. We are the customer.


    As I've already written in other threads, I think Cakewalk made a gutsy move when deciding to focus on fixes, not features, in the Sonar 8 upgrade. I too felt this way last week when I learned the details of this release, and I too expressed my frustration and disappointment with negative comments here on the forum.

    But after more thought, I've come to the conclusion that a) the philosophy behind the Sonar 8 release creates a win/win situation for Cakewalk and its users, and b) Cakewalk showed great strength of character in its decision not to focus on features.

    I've been a weekly visitor to this forum since I started using Sonar 4 3 years ago, and therefore it's been clear that Sonar's 64-bit audio engine has had serious problems since its release two years ago. The product has been way too sensitive to variations in drivers and platforms, and has been much more vulnerable to plugin-caused crashes than competing hosts and daw platforms.

    So, I disagree with your initial statement that Sonar 8 is a shambles. I would counter with: Sonar 6 and Sonar 7 had severe problems. Call it a "shambles" if you like, but I don't see it that way. Sonar 8 is an attempt to address the problems in Sonar 6 and Sonar 7.

    Don't misunderstand -- I'm not telling you to shut up. We all have to blow off some steam now and then, and you have plenty of empathy here.

    Cakewalk could have continued the status quo, piling more features on a questionable undercarriage. For two years they've managed by dealing with major problems in real time, while a handful of users here on the forum have served as an unpaid volunteer support group, helping noobs through configuration issues -- (great job, forums users.) But other DAWs just don't display this kind of eccentricity. Sure, noobs will have problems, but those problems are much more common in Sonar.

    But Cakewalk chose to do the right thing -- find out what's wrong, get in there and fix it. That took guts, because they knew they'd get reactions just like yours (and mine, last week).

    Now, I too was incensed over having to pay for these bug fixes.

    10 to 20 years ago in the software publishing industry, software took longer to manufacture. Subsequently, releases came intervals of every 1.5 to 3 years, instead of today's practice of a release every year. Those major releases were not discounted as steeply as today's upgrade, and were priced within 25% of the retail price. If you do the math, and stretch the $170 of today's Sonar upgrade over a longer time period, you'll find that today's price is consistent with yester years, and maybe even a few percentage points less.

    What I concluded was that we pay the same as we always did, whether we call it a new feature upgrade, or a maintenance release, whether we get a free update or have to pay for a major release. If you add it up, and divide by the number of years over the lifetime of the product, we pay what we always paid, because one way or another, a company has to maintain a revenue stream. That's the bottom line. Nobody is getting ripped off here, and nobody is getting rich -- it's business as usual, and in this case, that's not a bad thing.

    Listen, I felt the same way, but when I calmed down and thought, it all made sense and I'm not mad anymore. We needed these fixes -- sounds like they didn't get them all yet. And, we also need some new features -- if I don't get a compositional interface to score my music pretty soon, I'm gonna stomp my feet and hold my breath til I turn blue -- and won't Cakewalk be in trouble them!

    Hang in there -- the future does look brighter, but it requires patience, and that's how we support Cakewalk at this stage. Keep using Sonar and keep reporting back with your problems until they get addressed. We do have their attention.

    -- Kurt Matthies

    --kwgm
    #30
    Page: 12345.. > >> Showing page 1 of 6
    Jump to:
    © 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1