bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
"SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
I was using SONAR earlier today without problems. Then, after a reboot, SONAR comes up with "SONAR is not properly installed. Please reinstall it using your original CD". So I did reinstall. But it still complains with the same message and refuses to run. Why do these things always happen on a weekend when CW support is unavailable? Hopefully someone's seen dealt with this problem and can offer a clue so I won't have to be SONAR-less for the whole weekend.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/16 22:49:25
(permalink)
Curiously, SONAR works if I log in under a different Windows user name, even though both profiles are administrators. Bizarre. But here's a warning for you all: re-installing SONAR is NOT something you want to try "just to see if it helps". After reinstallation, not only did SONAR insist on having the authorization code re-entered, but so did Ozone. Jamstix would no longer load because it couldn't find its data directory, even though it was installed in the default VST folder. Kontakt 2 refuses to play anything at all. And of course SONAR has forgotten every setting and preference previously configured. What a pain.
post edited by bitflipper - 2007/06/16 22:55:35
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/16 23:19:24
(permalink)
|
coldsteal2
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 741
- Joined: 2007/01/19 11:28:40
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/16 23:33:32
(permalink)
Man, that blows there must be a software wizz on here that knows what to do, like one of the admin guys
|
Honest_Al
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3642
- Joined: 2005/12/09 00:07:27
- Location: just below the cloud on the left
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/16 23:47:59
(permalink)
like one of the admin guys Who? admins..here?
Singature!? I don't need no fu@#$% singature!
|
robinho2006
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 38
- Joined: 2006/01/07 02:03:28
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/16 23:54:05
(permalink)
I admin that I cant fix it
|
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13829
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/16 23:58:10
(permalink)
Sorry, no help BF. But mucho sympathy. Hope you get it worked out. And quit scarin me, will ya?
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 00:19:56
(permalink)
Sympathy's the next best thing to actual advice, so I'll take it! Here's what the problem appears to be: when SONAR installs, it writes a bunch of CLSIDs into HKEY_CURRENT_USER. I don't know if it always does that, or if I happened to install SONAR initially under a non-admin Windows login. But whatever the case, I can only run SONAR while logged in under the same Windows user name that I installed SONAR under. It will fail under any other Windows login, and fails with the particularly unhelpful message described above. My problem began when I logged in under another user name. Then, instead of thinking about the problem first, I went ahead and reinstalled SONAR as per its suggestion. Now, I've been troubleshooting software for 35 years and really ought to know better!!! So at least there's a lesson there that might help somebody else out: re-install SONAR as a last resort, not as the first step in troubleshooting. EDIT: droddy: no, not Vista, it's XP Pro. Can't blame it on Microsoft, I'm afraid. It's a repercussion of all the security enhancements MS has had to make in response to all those whiners out there complaining that Windows isn't secure enough. That's why users can't write to HKLM anymore.
post edited by bitflipper - 2007/06/17 00:32:17
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
mr. moon
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1515
- Joined: 2003/11/10 00:23:35
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 11:30:10
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: bitflipper Sympathy's the next best thing to actual advice, so I'll take it! Here's what the problem appears to be: when SONAR installs, it writes a bunch of CLSIDs into HKEY_CURRENT_USER. I don't know if it always does that, or if I happened to install SONAR initially under a non-admin Windows login. But whatever the case, I can only run SONAR while logged in under the same Windows user name that I installed SONAR under. It will fail under any other Windows login, and fails with the particularly unhelpful message described above. My problem began when I logged in under another user name. Then, instead of thinking about the problem first, I went ahead and reinstalled SONAR as per its suggestion. Now, I've been troubleshooting software for 35 years and really ought to know better!!! So at least there's a lesson there that might help somebody else out: re-install SONAR as a last resort, not as the first step in troubleshooting. EDIT: droddy: no, not Vista, it's XP Pro. Can't blame it on Microsoft, I'm afraid. It's a repercussion of all the security enhancements MS has had to make in response to all those whiners out there complaining that Windows isn't secure enough. That's why users can't write to HKLM anymore. It's a corrupted user profile which is causing your problems, I've had the same thing happen in the past. What you'll have to do to fix it is create a new user profile (create a new user with admin permissions and log in under this user account), re-install sonar 6 under the new account, and then transfer all your old data over to the new profile (log in as admin and drag files from the old user my docs folder to the new user docs folder, and so on...). Sucks, but (IMO) it's the way that SONAR works with the application data and "NTUSER.DAT" file found in the user's profile folder which kills the ability for SONAR to run when the application data gets too corrupted. Icky stuff. No registry cleaner or system utility I have tried can fix the problem to allow SONAR to run under that user account once this error rears it head. Good luck! -mr moon
Intel Core 2 QUAD Q6600 4 GB 800MHz DDR2 RME FireFace 800 Windows 64 Pro "...Think outside the box as you mix within!" -mrmoon
|
ew
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1837
- Joined: 2004/01/27 21:24:49
- Location: Eagan, MN
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 11:38:09
(permalink)
I've seen that message after doing some registry cleaning/fixing on a couple occasions. If you tend to tweak your registry at all, don't try to fix any invalid keys dealing with Cakewalk and/or Sonar; just ignore them. ew
post edited by ew - 2007/06/17 11:43:34
|
mwbrown
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 196
- Joined: 2004/05/16 14:55:25
- Location: Liverpool, UK
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 12:15:14
(permalink)
Have you tried system restore. Restore to a point a 1 or 2 days before. If it's a registry problem that should fix it.
post edited by mwbrown - 2007/06/17 12:31:39
Win 7 64 Intel I5 3.60 @ 4.60Mhz NVIDIA Geforce GTX 260 8Gig RAM M-Audio Oxygen8 midi Keyboard M-Audio Audiophile 192 SONAR X1c 64 Korg I3 Keyboard American Fender Stratocaster Guitar
|
mr. moon
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1515
- Joined: 2003/11/10 00:23:35
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 12:31:58
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: mwbrown Have you tried system restore. Restore to a point a 1 or 2 days before. If it's a registry problem that should fix it. I have tried that too, but it does not appear to fix the specific registry information found in the user profile which has gotten corrupted. -mr moon
Intel Core 2 QUAD Q6600 4 GB 800MHz DDR2 RME FireFace 800 Windows 64 Pro "...Think outside the box as you mix within!" -mrmoon
|
Hawky
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 530
- Joined: 2004/11/08 22:44:57
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 13:18:08
(permalink)
A GHOST image would be nice to have about right now. I have been using GHOST since the start and only had to use it once. But man, it sure was nice to see everything brought back to life after something like this happens. When I GHOST an image I write it to one of my other drives. When the computer boots up from the GHOST boot disk you can still access the other drives to do a restore; much faster than CD's or DVD's. Takes about 7 minutes. Good Luck! Hawky
|
mwbrown
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 196
- Joined: 2004/05/16 14:55:25
- Location: Liverpool, UK
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 14:32:53
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: mr. moon ORIGINAL: mwbrown Have you tried system restore. Restore to a point a 1 or 2 days before. If it's a registry problem that should fix it. I have tried that too, but it does not appear to fix the specific registry information found in the user profile which has gotten corrupted. -mr moon You probably didn't go back far enough. I have schedular do an automatic restore point every day at 1600 hrs, yes everyday, and I could go back more than a week if the first restore doesn't fix it. It's got me out of trouble more than I can remember. As I understand it system restore restores the complete registry amongst other things. Good luck
Win 7 64 Intel I5 3.60 @ 4.60Mhz NVIDIA Geforce GTX 260 8Gig RAM M-Audio Oxygen8 midi Keyboard M-Audio Audiophile 192 SONAR X1c 64 Korg I3 Keyboard American Fender Stratocaster Guitar
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 14:34:47
(permalink)
I believe you are correct, mr moon. That's exactly what I ended up doing -- created a new login, re-installed SONAR, spent most of my usual Saturday night studio time reconstructing my environment. What a pain. I intend to do some experiments today and try to determine just what the real problem is -- knowing that, perhaps I can devise a less brute-force strategy if it happens again.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 15:11:20
(permalink)
I would find it hard to believe that a complete uninstall and registry cleaning and then reinstall would not fix such a problem and allow you to keep using the same user account.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 16:01:48
(permalink)
I would normally conclude the same thing. However, I did a complete uninstall of SONAR, re-installed it and it refuses to run under the old profile. Wish I knew what it was looking for! UPDATE: Came up with a slightly more elegant solution, which is to start SONAR using the Run As service, which allows me to start it up as if I were a different user. Not a fix, just a workaround. I'll be contacting CW support next week to discuss it, will post any useful information here.
post edited by bitflipper - 2007/06/17 16:17:59
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 16:12:10
(permalink)
You would have to do a registry cleanup by hand probably, and make sure that all the data in your per-user directory really got removed. Many programs are very bad about leaving stuff around, so it's probably picking up the old (corrupt) data again. It can be tedious since it's not unusual for a program to leave literally hundreds of entries in the registry even after being uninstalled. It's pretty ridiculous and one reason why the registry can become a huge, bloated bad o'junk.
post edited by droddey - 2007/06/17 20:03:59
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 16:19:55
(permalink)
Yeah, I know all too well about the detritus that gets left behind in the registry. But I've also been burned by regclean, so I remove stuff with great caution - and back everything up, of course. I went as far as importing all the Cakewalk-related keys and all CLSIDs from the "good" profile's HKCU hive. Still SONAR complains. I'll nail this sucker if it takes all Sunday!
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
rictheobscene
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 642
- Joined: 2005/03/25 17:17:44
- Location: Right between the cutoff and the resonance knobs
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 18:32:52
(permalink)
|
Honest_Al
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3642
- Joined: 2005/12/09 00:07:27
- Location: just below the cloud on the left
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 19:14:17
(permalink)
Yeah, I know all too well about the detritus that gets left behind in the registry. But I've also been burned by regclean, so I remove stuff with great caution - and back everything up, of course. Dean actually said "a register cleanup by hand" .. I never got burned from anything like REGCLEAN because I never ran such stuff here Yes, I stay away from any kind of registry cleaners here.. I did run one or two (the kind that does nothing without the user's permission) just to see what it wants to remove but I didn't commit it..I didn't let it proceed, I felt OK with removing some keys from that list but not all .. everything runs fine here and with lots of extra garbage in the registry! not all the garbage is the same.. one little key missing or corrupted can have more (bad) impact than hundreds of leftovers.. all the magic "clean your registry" talk doesn't belong to the DAW world IMHO .. you simply got to know what you're doing and either remove by hand or have a full backup+registry backups..just in case.
Singature!? I don't need no fu@#$% singature!
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 22:07:11
(permalink)
With Sonar 6.21, they began to support that new Windows User Account Control. So, what used to be stashed in the registry is now stashed under some special location. I had to implement the exact same techniques in my own software in order to support Vista. It has resulted in a more complex installation procedure and new support issues, but that's the price of "security". The new strategy: assume every user is a total idiot who can only be trusted in a sandbox. I will continue to support Vista and use it for development and testing because I have to, but Vista will not infect my DAW for the foreseeable future.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 22:25:19
(permalink)
Al, I know you hate Registry Cleaners but I have found "Easy Cleaner" to be reliable. It has multiple undos in case something went wrong and so you're able to go back after the fact. When I know what I'm doing I do it all by hand but when I'm not 100% I use Easy Cleaner and monitor what's being deleted beforehand.
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/17 22:47:15
(permalink)
The new strategy: assume every user is a total idiot who can only be trusted in a sandbox. I will continue to support Vista and use it for development and testing because I have to, but Vista will not infect my DAW for the foreseeable future. That's not really fair. They assume that most users are not sufficiently technical to protect themselves against the many ways that jerks will try to take advantage of them, which is completely true.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/18 00:08:32
(permalink)
OK, I was being a bit harsh. But I still liked it better when the O/S stayed out of my way. But those days are gone forever, it's a new world where the "information superhighway" has turned into the "information dark alley" and every creep on the planet feels entitled to pester me, steal from me, or sell me useless crap. I am bitter, yes. I hope to sell my business in the near future and retire to an island in the Philippines, where I will build my studio in the middle of a mango orchard. No kidding.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/18 00:33:29
(permalink)
So here's what I've been thinking about... Completely OT, but since we probably aren't going to solve your problem, I guess we should just try to distract you. If I can end up, after being raped by the tax man, with at least say 8 million in the bank, what I would like to do is set up a kind of music school. Not for teaching music, but more for taking promising young acts and giving them a permanent, nice place to practice, where they are given a chance to get lessons from top notch people, where they learn about the business of music, and get practice in the recording studio, get maturity lessons so that they can handle some fame should it come their way, etc... I was thinking of a little Skywalker Ranch sort of thing, where there will be a few small studios spread out around the ranch, and around each studio, linked by fiber optics, there will be band rooms. So each band will get their own room and have a permanent set of equipment there that is always in place for practice, so that they don't ahve to use their road gear. They would be able to have their practices there, and come there for lessons and seminars and so forth. When they are ready to record something, their rooms fiber optic link back to the studio would be hooked up, which would provide transmission of mics and DIs and video back and forth, and they can just record their bits right there in place. This would allow a fairly reasonable investment in studio equipment to support a good number of bands, and it wouldn't have to be large since it would just be a remote control room. The producer and engineer would be there, and one or more helpers would be at the band room side to facilitate setting up mics and so forth. The concept would be that I'd start it, maybe with just one of these little studio/practice room enclaves, and that each selected act would sign a contract agreeing to give back X percent of their revenues for however long it takes to get back some given amount. It would be a fairly small percentage since if they never hit big it won't make any differnce and if they do, then that's all it would require. This would hopefully, over time, make it fairly self-sustaining, though obviously it would be nice to get other contributions from folks in the music industry to help support it. In order to make it reasonable to do, I'd probably have to move back to the south east (horrors) where land is cheaper and the cost of doing things is cheaper. I figure I'd also kind of see it as contributing back to my homeland by establishing what could eventually become a fairly important thing. Not so much from revenues generated from the actual endeavor, which would be small given that it's a non-profit, but by creating a thriving music scene that would bring business to the area. Anyway, it's probably not remotely practical, but it's something I'd like to do if I could get enough out of my business to allow for it. I figure I'd have to throw in a couple million to really get it started and have enough left to get it through one 'cycle of acts' and get it taken seriously so that hopefully other funds would then become available and hopefully some of the first generation of acts would start producing some return as well.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/18 02:24:08
(permalink)
Oh, yeh, I like it. Very noble, completely impractical, but I would come out of retirement to come down and help pull cables. I just now watched "Before the Music Dies", a documentary about the sad state of the music industry, and something everyone on this forum would appreciate -- I highly recommend it. But it's sooo depressing. Good thing I decided to check the forum before hitting the sack. Your concept cheered me up.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/18 03:17:35
(permalink)
Of course another option is that I just spend it all on coke, hookers, and studio equipment...
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/18 10:44:10
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: bitflipper Oh, yeh, I like it. Very noble, completely impractical, but I would come out of retirement to come down and help pull cables. I liked it too. Why is it that great dreams like this always end up in the "impractical" bin? No argument, bitflipper, you're right, of course, but why? Is it wrapped up in what they call "human nature"? Personalities and egos? Or is it that the almighty dollar always gets in the way (i.e. greed)? We could probably add several pages to this thread about Utopian ideals, the pitfalls of unbridled Capitalism, and the practical limitations of Communism, etc. (If that actually happens, I apologize in advance!) Meanwhile, I hope that the world awakens one day and actually makes sense to everybody, and in a harmonious fashion, preferably.
|
Abe
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 542
- Joined: 2006/05/02 05:26:49
- Status: offline
RE: "SONAR is not properly installed" WTF?
2007/06/18 11:41:40
(permalink)
Bitflipper I've got that error every month or so. Just reapplying the latest 6.21 update should solve it. I didn't detect any side effects.
|