mkerl
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 190
- Joined: 2015/03/26 17:13:30
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2017/12/31 23:21:57
(permalink)
S.L.I.P.
mkerl Demo killed Asio-Driver (Quadcap). Deleted
You should be able to change back to the Quad capture. If you can't, this was posted by Jim from Purrfect Audio: To get rid of the Magix Low Latency ASIO driver:
Go into the Registry... HKLM>Software>ASIO - delete the Magix Low Latency ASIO driver entry HKLM>Software>WOW6432Node>ASIO - delete the Magix Low Latency ASIO driver entry
Thank you for your effort, but I decided not to use samp. Happy new year!
Nothing to do but playing (Ch. Parker)
|
Zo
Max Output Level: -25 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5036
- Joined: 2008/01/25 20:49:55
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/01 01:13:50
(permalink)
If we run the unistaller for samp , isn t it enought to get rid of all this stuff ?
For sale (PM me) : transfert ilok includedEventide Ultrachannel make offersSoftube Summit EQIK Neve 1081 , Neve precision Comp/LimEastWest GoshtwriterSoundforge Pro 12
|
mkerl
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 190
- Joined: 2015/03/26 17:13:30
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/01 01:19:31
(permalink)
Zo If we run the unistaller for samp , isn t it enought to get rid of all this stuff ?
No, to clean the registry, you should follow the suggestions given by scook and S.L.I.P. I use some nice tools to clean the reg.dat, Wise care, regseeker or ccleaner are free and useful. But don't forget to make a backup before :) Cheers !
Nothing to do but playing (Ch. Parker)
|
Larry Jones
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 834
- Joined: 2007/10/11 02:45:33
- Location: Southern California
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/01 02:59:46
(permalink)
cecelius2 Does Samplitude have a means of organizing plugins? I see that some of the vst's and vsti's are automatically arranged into sub-categories (like Reverb, Dynamics, etc.), but I don't see any way of adding plugins to these categories, nor do I see a way of having a "favorites" category or adding new sub-categories.
The answer is "no." The only workaround I've seen is to put your plugins into folders in Windows File Explorer. Then they will show up that way in Samplitude. Some kind of plugin manager has been suggested to the developers as a feature request.
SONAR Platinum 2017.10 • CbB • Win10 • i7/2600 • 16GB RAM • Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 • NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS
|
Resonant Serpent
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 463
- Joined: 2014/09/26 11:23:12
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/01 04:41:28
(permalink)
cecelius2 Does Samplitude have a means of organizing plugins? I see that some of the vst's and vsti's are automatically arranged into sub-categories (like Reverb, Dynamics, etc.), but I don't see any way of adding plugins to these categories, nor do I see a way of having a "favorites" category or adding new sub-categories.
There's a utility for it. Check this thread : http://support2.magix.net...or-samplitude-sequoia/
A deep chesty bawl echoes from rimrock to rimrock, rolls down the mountain, and fades into the far blackness of the night. It is an outburst of wild defiant sorrow, and of contempt for all the adversities of the world. - Aldo Leopold
|
35mm
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1105
- Joined: 2008/12/09 08:21:44
- Location: Devon, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/01 16:40:23
(permalink)
Larry Jones I am liking Samplitude, but from a mostly theoretical point of view. I mean, it does a lot, comes with a lot of instruments and effects, and seems to be an all-in-one solution for a bedroom songwriter like me. But it is so freakin' fiddly! Every setting has to be done manually, and there are so many of them! Also, at my age, do I want to look at an interface with fonts so small I'm not always sure what I am seeing, if anything? I used nothing but SONAR for ~20 years, so I know I will have to relearn a lot of things that had become automatic, but this first week with Samplitude has been an awful lot of work!
What resolution/size screen do you have Larry? I have pretty bad eyesight but I hadn't noticed font sizes being a particular issue in Samp. I'm on a 32" 1920 x 1080. As far as settings go, I have found most of them are set once then left and for most of them, the default is fine. I do like the fact that it's so adaptable though. I'm still getting to grips with it while I work with it, but at least I am able to work in it without the learning curve getting in the way too much. It's all horses for courses but after the initial WTF moments, I am now enjoying it more than Sonar.
Splat, Win 10 64bit and all sorts of musical odds and sods collected over the years, but still missing a lot of my old analogue stuff I sold off years ago.
|
Zo
Max Output Level: -25 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5036
- Joined: 2008/01/25 20:49:55
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/01 17:48:57
(permalink)
For sale (PM me) : transfert ilok includedEventide Ultrachannel make offersSoftube Summit EQIK Neve 1081 , Neve precision Comp/LimEastWest GoshtwriterSoundforge Pro 12
|
Larry Jones
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 834
- Joined: 2007/10/11 02:45:33
- Location: Southern California
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/02 05:49:08
(permalink)
35mm What resolution/size screen do you have Larry? I have pretty bad eyesight but I hadn't noticed font sizes being a particular issue in Samp. I'm on a 32" 1920 x 1080.
As far as settings go, I have found most of them are set once then left and for most of them, the default is fine. I do like the fact that it's so adaptable though. I'm still getting to grips with it while I work with it, but at least I am able to work in it without the learning curve getting in the way too much. It's all horses for courses but after the initial WTF moments, I am now enjoying it more than Sonar.
I'm using two monitors side by side, 1280x1024 each, so effectively 2560x1024. I haven't tried any kind of a fix yet -- still thinking there might be a setting for screen fonts buried somewhere, or maybe in one of the Birdline skins that came with it -- but the labels on the screen elements are too small for me. As for settings, the defaults have not worked for me. I've had to mess with things that seem as if they should be preset more logically out of the box. I think I have needed more handholding in my first week with Samplitude than in the whole time I have used SONAR. My struggle has become a matter of personal pride, and I am now in "tame-the-beast mode," but if things don't start making sense to me soon, I will have to move on, as I don't have much time left to do what I really want to do, which is write and record new songs.
SONAR Platinum 2017.10 • CbB • Win10 • i7/2600 • 16GB RAM • Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 • NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS
|
200bpm
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 337
- Joined: 2014/06/25 15:01:55
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/02 16:01:09
(permalink)
I was a Samplitude user and was on their upgrade train from 2005 til this past update when I switched to Sonar. I owned Pro Suite and had been paying their exorbitant update fees from Samp 7 through X1. When they came out with X3, I essentially "lost" all the investment I had made into their suite, and from an upgrade perspective, was lumped in with the lowly "classic" users who were on the lower product tier. So I had already spent a couple grand and if I wanted X3 Pro Suite it would be something like another $400-500. (Same as if someone was upgrading from the low tier product.) The mentality was, "we are all pro users here, what is $500 for an upgrade? My thoughts on this $149 pricing is that it's a cash grab before they close the doors. A little bit of history about the DAW. *10-15 years ago, it absolutely had the best sounding audio engine and audio editing of other DAWs. It also had an attractive and professional UI. Other DAWs have caught up and surpassed; very little has been done with the UI. *5 years ago, they undertook an OS X port and after a couple years of work, they announced that they were scrapping that project and would remain Windows only. * MAGIX had software distribution in major box stores, you could buy their products at Best Buy. They also had a dedicated pro broadcast audience from prior decade. Essentially they were selling cheap products and high end pro products. I don't know if that business model works today. ( The consumer $49 version was actually a mildly scaled down version of Samp and you could absolutely produce music with it, as long as you didn't need advanced audio editing.) *The online community is about 1/20th the size of Sonars. Infrequent posts often take days to weeks for anyone to respond. *Samplitude is a "heavy" app and runs fewer instances of a plugin than does Sonar. In summary, while they were in the lead in some important areas, the impression was that each upgrade release represented relatively little work. There would be a few new internal features, but the UI largely stayed the same, and the fiddly nature never changed. This is a warning to those considering the upgrade. To fresh eyes, it may seem vibrant and new, but having been with it for years, the feeling (I had) was that it's dying. I don't see anything about it that would save it from Cakewalk's fate.
i7 4790K @ 4.8/1.325v Gigabyte Z97X-ud3h, 16GB DDR3 2300, RME UFX, Sonar 3Xe
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/02 17:06:00
(permalink)
Magix is a large German software development company. They do far more than create/sell DAW software... (Graphics, Web-Design, Video Editing, etc) Just bought Vegas from Sony... so I doubt they're in financial trouble. Gibson is half a *billion* in debt! Boggles the mind as to how that was allowed to happen... IMO, Samplitude's Object based audio editing is still significantly more advanced than most other DAW applications. The one exception being Reaper (with its Item based editing - which was "cherry-picked" from Samplitude). The MIDI side of Samp isn't as advanced as Cubase, but the Piano Roll is nice... and the notation is decent. I prefer Sonar's GUI, but I can get around Samplitude pretty easily (wrote the English users manual for a earlier version of Samplitude 2496). One thing I miss in Samplitude (vs Sonar Platinum) is Track Templates. Simple feature... but what a time-saver Performance wise, I don't think Samplitude is particularly inefficient. They implemented a Read-Ahead Performance Cache a *long* time ago... and that dramatically increased performance. Reaper is the most CPU efficient DAW application. Sonar Platinum is one of the more efficient DAWs. By comparison, I find Samplitude's performance to be middle-of-the-road. Much more efficient than Live (albeit Live's audio engine is focused on other priorities like Warping audio) If you're a long time Sonar user, no matter which DAW you choose to be your new #1, you're going to make some compromises. There will be some things you love (gap-less audio engine)... and others that'll leave you scratching your head (no Track Templates). All the current major DAW applications are capable of amazing results. It's just a matter of finding the one whose "compromises" best suit your situation.
|
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/02 17:35:08
(permalink)
Jim Roseberry Magix is a large German software development company. They do far more than create/sell DAW software... (Graphics, Web-Design, Video Editing, etc) Just bought Vegas from Sony... so I doubt they're in financial trouble. Gibson is half a *billion* in debt! Boggles the mind as to how that was allowed to happen... IMO, Samplitude's Object based audio editing is still significantly more advanced than most other DAW applications. The one exception being Reaper (with its Item based editing - which was "cherry-picked" from Samplitude). The MIDI side of Samp isn't as advanced as Cubase, but the Piano Roll is nice... and the notation is decent. I prefer Sonar's GUI, but I can get around Samplitude pretty easily (wrote the English users manual for a earlier version of Samplitude 2496). One thing I miss in Samplitude (vs Sonar Platinum) is Track Templates. Simple feature... but what a time-saver Performance wise, I don't think Samplitude is particularly inefficient. They implemented a Read-Ahead Performance Cache a *long* time ago... and that dramatically increased performance. Reaper is the most CPU efficient DAW application. Sonar Platinum is one of the more efficient DAWs. By comparison, I find Samplitude's performance to be middle-of-the-road. Much more efficient than Live (albeit Live's audio engine is focused on other priorities like Warping audio) If you're a long time Sonar user, no matter which DAW you choose to be your new #1, you're going to make some compromises. There will be some things you love (gap-less audio engine)... and others that'll leave you scratching your head (no Track Templates). All the current major DAW applications are capable of amazing results. It's just a matter of finding the one whose "compromises" best suit your situation.
Hey Jim, long time no see. I'm still using the two M-Audio Delta 2496 cards I bought to run on separate Windows 98SE machines, one running Sonar and the other running GigaStudio and Purrrfect Drums that I bought from you so many moons ago. I use both those Delta 2496 cards in my single Win7 64-Bit machine now with REAPER, and spend all my time recording music, and not working on chasing some issue with my DAW. You mentioned CPU efficiency. I run more than 100 plugins on my projects with a measly 2.66Ghz Intel i5 and Asus P7P55D based machine that I built 6 or 7 years ago. Some day it will break and I'll be forced to build an upgraded machine. So is there a problem with cherry picking good stuff that other products have? I use clip based pitch correction through clip based envelopes when there is a stray flat or sharp note, and add effects to single clips to do things like make a solo stand out. Is that what you are referring to that REAPER cherry picked? Who did they steal editable notes on a staff from? <G>
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/02 18:11:12
(permalink)
Hi Glennbo, Been a good while... and it's nice to see you! FWIW, I was one of the one's pushing the Reaper devs (years back) to "cherry-pick" the Object editor type features from Samplitude. So... I certainly don't think it's bad/wrong/etc. My point above... was to mention that Reaper was the only other DAW application that had similar editing capability (and that it originated in Samplitude). I've had Reaper playing a stress-test project (48-sample ASIO buffer size) where the CPU is running at 99%... and the audio played back glitch-free. That's amazing. My only "criticism" of Reaper is that is configurable almost to a fault... and I'm not crazy about the default UI. Performance, function, and stability are all excellent. Also great to see ARA is being implemented! I've got most of the major PC DAW applications (including Reaper)... and there's a lot of like about all of them.
|
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/02 18:39:37
(permalink)
Jim Roseberry Hi Glennbo, Been a good while... and it's nice to see you! FWIW, I was one of the one's pushing the Reaper devs (years back) to "cherry-pick" the Object editor type features from Samplitude. So... I certainly don't think it's bad/wrong/etc. My point above... was to mention that Reaper was the only other DAW application that had similar editing capability (and that it originated in Samplitude).
Well feel free to push them to ripoff other things you like from all the DAWs you have at your disposal! I don't use it that much, but when I need clip level editing, I sure like it. I've had Reaper playing a stress-test project (48-sample ASIO buffer size) where the CPU is running at 99%... and the audio played back glitch-free. That's amazing.
It was REAPER's efficiency and stability that converted me from Sonar ten years ago. Those are my #1 requirements in a DAW. I can't run 48 sample with my ancient M-Audio 2496 cards, but I do run them at 64 samples, and never ever change it from that, no matter how many tracks or plugins I have in a song. My only "criticism" of Reaper is that is configurable almost to a fault... and I'm not crazy about the default UI. Performance, function, and stability are all excellent. Also great to see ARA is being implemented!
I'm not a fan of the stock theme. I use a modified version of White Tie's Imperial theme that has been sized down to fit on a single large monitor. When they release a version with ARA2, I may have to actually consider looking at Melodyne, although most of my projects are comprised of recorded performances that sounded good enough to consider them as "keeper" tracks to begin with, so post editing is not really used much. I've got most of the major PC DAW applications (including Reaper)... and there's a lot of like about all of them.
I would expect nothing less. Before I retired at 59, I was doing software development and support, so I had every flavor of Windows and some Linux setup in my office so I could hands on any call I might get to troubleshoot. Happy New Year!
|
35mm
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1105
- Joined: 2008/12/09 08:21:44
- Location: Devon, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/03 01:17:33
(permalink)
200bpm I was a Samplitude user and was on their upgrade train from 2005 til this past update when I switched to Sonar. I owned Pro Suite and had been paying their exorbitant update fees from Samp 7 through X1. When they came out with X3, I essentially "lost" all the investment I had made into their suite, and from an upgrade perspective, was lumped in with the lowly "classic" users who were on the lower product tier. So I had already spent a couple grand and if I wanted X3 Pro Suite it would be something like another $400-500. (Same as if someone was upgrading from the low tier product.) The mentality was, "we are all pro users here, what is $500 for an upgrade? My thoughts on this $149 pricing is that it's a cash grab before they close the doors. A little bit of history about the DAW. *10-15 years ago, it absolutely had the best sounding audio engine and audio editing of other DAWs. It also had an attractive and professional UI. Other DAWs have caught up and surpassed; very little has been done with the UI. *5 years ago, they undertook an OS X port and after a couple years of work, they announced that they were scrapping that project and would remain Windows only. * MAGIX had software distribution in major box stores, you could buy their products at Best Buy. They also had a dedicated pro broadcast audience from prior decade. Essentially they were selling cheap products and high end pro products. I don't know if that business model works today. ( The consumer $49 version was actually a mildly scaled down version of Samp and you could absolutely produce music with it, as long as you didn't need advanced audio editing.) *The online community is about 1/20th the size of Sonars. Infrequent posts often take days to weeks for anyone to respond. *Samplitude is a "heavy" app and runs fewer instances of a plugin than does Sonar. In summary, while they were in the lead in some important areas, the impression was that each upgrade release represented relatively little work. There would be a few new internal features, but the UI largely stayed the same, and the fiddly nature never changed. This is a warning to those considering the upgrade. To fresh eyes, it may seem vibrant and new, but having been with it for years, the feeling (I had) was that it's dying. I don't see anything about it that would save it from Cakewalk's fate.
Well, I'm new to Samplitude, only had it about a month, but... 'Samplitude is a "heavy" app and runs fewer instances of a plugin than does Sonar.' I have found it the opposite and more capable than Sonar so far when it comes to bogging down with plugins. I don't think Samplitude is going to disappear anytime soon. Magix is huge, and apparently, they have recently taken on more developers to move things forward faster. I have been a Magix customer for many years and what I would say is that their marketing for Samplitude seems to be pretty crap. I ignored it for years without ever even trying it because I assumed it was an overpriced piece of junk. I only went for this deal to get SpectralLayers mainly, but I installed Samplitude and tried it out and ended up loving it! I was worried about the cost of staying up to date, but I was told they do have deals like this one every so often and usually around this time of year. I guess they get more business out of deals like this for less than the cost of a big marketing campaign.
Splat, Win 10 64bit and all sorts of musical odds and sods collected over the years, but still missing a lot of my old analogue stuff I sold off years ago.
|
Zo
Max Output Level: -25 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5036
- Joined: 2008/01/25 20:49:55
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/03 21:38:44
(permalink)
I was heavily "studing" Magix during those dayz and it appears that the make it smart ... The have diffrent product from large populatin target to real pro 'strenght number one" Second is that the diversity of stuff : i just bought web designer for making my webdsite and might buy their photo editing stuff cause photoshop plan is a reap off nowdayz ... i had a look at the soundforge 12 studio thing and i do think they're going that road for all their products , basically i bought webdesigner bu i know it's gonna be all xara soon , what i think is that for samplitude / soundforge and spectral pro , they gonna do major lifting and those prices are to have a solid user base to then offer upgrades !! The question is buy now uprades later , or wait for next versions discount ... At this stage i don't see myself using samplitude , same for reaper , those 2 daws are the most powerfull alternative i've found, but when i put off my technical engineer hat to wear my producer one , those 2 have a decade of enhacment when it come to interface and workflow .... the guyz focus on engines and make porshes that are not pleasant to drive , no need to have porshe or ferrari technology if driving those is a pain
For sale (PM me) : transfert ilok includedEventide Ultrachannel make offersSoftube Summit EQIK Neve 1081 , Neve precision Comp/LimEastWest GoshtwriterSoundforge Pro 12
|
35mm
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1105
- Joined: 2008/12/09 08:21:44
- Location: Devon, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/04 00:32:02
(permalink)
Zo, yes you are right. I suspect 90% of creatives have bought some Magix software at some point. Xara Photo & Graphic designer is just great and I was really tempted to get that a few years ago. I got it with the Vegas Humble Bundle deal a couple weeks ago but haven't had a chance to use it yet. I have used Paintshop Pro and Illustrator (always had problems with Photoshop) for years. I think you are right that they are plowing new efforts into their audio software including the software they just acquired from Sony. I think their marketing strategy with Samplitude over xmas has been very shrewd - instead of the huge cost of a marketing campaign, spend the money on a hugely discounted deal. I personally predict that the upgrade path will be affordable for a while though (via special deals if we wait) because they will be making some step changes to modernize and align all their products and we will ultimately be the testers. As far as Samplitude goes, I have found it to be absolutely a great fit for my workflow. I am loving it and it behaves so well on my system. It is a very strong bit of software and I had never considered it before.
Splat, Win 10 64bit and all sorts of musical odds and sods collected over the years, but still missing a lot of my old analogue stuff I sold off years ago.
|
exitthelemming
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 29
- Joined: 2003/11/08 07:56:45
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/07 00:29:18
(permalink)
Am I correct in thinking that the Independence sampler (the 70 gig version that takes millennia to download) that is part of the $149 Samplitude Pro X3 suite CANNOT be used in other DAWS i.e. it is locked to Samplitude only? This limitation does not seem clear from any of the documentation or literature available from the MAGIX website
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/07 00:50:24
(permalink)
Yes, the bundled Independence may only be used in Samplitude. In fact, the VST scanner in SoundForge failed because it could not handle the 32bit Independence dll. I had to rename the file to get SF11 (or SF10) to scan properly. Fortunately, the other DAWs I have did not complain about the 64bit Independence dll but I did hide the synth from threm.
|
Larry Jones
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 834
- Joined: 2007/10/11 02:45:33
- Location: Southern California
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/07 07:13:08
(permalink)
exitthelemming Am I correct in thinking that the Independence sampler (the 70 gig version that takes millennia to download) that is part of the $149 Samplitude Pro X3 suite CANNOT be used in other DAWS i.e. it is locked to Samplitude only? This limitation does not seem clear from any of the documentation or literature available from the MAGIX website
The bundled one is locked to Samplitude. But you can buy it if you want to use it elsewhere.
SONAR Platinum 2017.10 • CbB • Win10 • i7/2600 • 16GB RAM • Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 • NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS
|
exitthelemming
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 29
- Joined: 2003/11/08 07:56:45
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/08 13:12:52
(permalink)
Many thanks for the responses. I guess it would be churlish to bemoan the limited availability of this particular vsti given the eye-watering value that the whole $149 package represents. (I want it all for even less than the very little I'm being asked....}
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/08 20:50:12
(permalink)
Jim Roseberry All the current major DAW applications are capable of amazing results. It's just a matter of finding the one whose "compromises" best suit your situation.
These two statements could replace virtually all the threads about the pros and cons of various DAWs
|
Larry Jones
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 834
- Joined: 2007/10/11 02:45:33
- Location: Southern California
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/08 21:19:38
(permalink)
Anderton
Jim Roseberry All the current major DAW applications are capable of amazing results. It's just a matter of finding the one whose "compromises" best suit your situation.
These two statements could replace virtually all the threads about the pros and cons of various DAWs It's all one big Coffee House now, Craig. We just like to chat with our SONAR pals, even if it seems slightly pointless.
SONAR Platinum 2017.10 • CbB • Win10 • i7/2600 • 16GB RAM • Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 • NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS
|
Soundwise
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1419
- Joined: 2015/01/25 17:11:34
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/08 21:47:17
(permalink)
Larry Jones I am liking Samplitude, but <...> it is so freakin' fiddly! Every setting has to be done manually, and there are so many of them!
You can do a lot from the help menu.
|
Zo
Max Output Level: -25 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5036
- Joined: 2008/01/25 20:49:55
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/08 22:29:34
(permalink)
In person i don't even install Daw's extra , for that exact reason , i want cross "daw "tools , so its kontakt for samplng as well as falcon ...case close ( also the GB on my ssd is a preciuous value !!) lol same for FX ..i tend to use 3rd party but i'm starting to reconsider this with studio one tools specially the midi tools (arpg , chord ect) , really usuable .
For sale (PM me) : transfert ilok includedEventide Ultrachannel make offersSoftube Summit EQIK Neve 1081 , Neve precision Comp/LimEastWest GoshtwriterSoundforge Pro 12
|
burgerproduction
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 209
- Joined: 2015/05/01 02:49:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/12 14:33:11
(permalink)
hi guys. I decided to let the presonus crossgrade deal go by, so I'm considering the Samplitude one. However, before diving in, would you say any of the soft synths are worth using. I mean, would you replace any of the VSTs you use with them, or are they just SSD balast? I'm kind of interested in the venetian organ and would def like to know if there are decent brush drums. any views?
Cakewalk by Bandlab, Sonar Platinum Lifetimer, Windows 10, HP Laptop, CPU i5, RAM 8GB. Audio interface: Edirol FA-101 Firewire interface with moded drivers. Microphones: Audio-Technica, M-Audio, Behringer, AKG. Pianos: Casio digital, Yamaha B1 upright. Guitars: Dobro, Tanglewood, Danelectro, Fender. Hats: Fez Check out my music : https://53mph.bandcamp.com/album/like-water-to-the-sand
|
35mm
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1105
- Joined: 2008/12/09 08:21:44
- Location: Devon, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/13 14:14:40
(permalink)
burgerproduction hi guys. I decided to let the presonus crossgrade deal go by, so I'm considering the Samplitude one. However, before diving in, would you say any of the soft synths are worth using. I mean, would you replace any of the VSTs you use with them, or are they just SSD balast? I'm kind of interested in the venetian organ and would def like to know if there are decent brush drums. any views?
I haven't really gone through the included soft synths much, but dabbling with them a bit they seem pretty good.
Splat, Win 10 64bit and all sorts of musical odds and sods collected over the years, but still missing a lot of my old analogue stuff I sold off years ago.
|
S.L.I.P.
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 949
- Joined: 2004/07/10 18:00:29
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/13 14:29:34
(permalink)
Like 35mm, I've only gone through a few, but I'm pleasantly surprised.
|
burgerproduction
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 209
- Joined: 2015/05/01 02:49:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/14 12:14:31
(permalink)
Well, today is the last day of the Samplitude deal. I downloaded the demo and have been playing about with it. I'm sorry to report that I really don't like it very much. It does not sit well on a laptop screen. Might work better on a split screen, but on the laptop it feels crowded. I loved Sonar for it's ability to drag the screen around to fit tasks. Either I'm missing something or Samplitude just doesn't have that. A stupid example is, when you open a VST instrument, there is no minimise button on the window, so you have to close it and reopen it everytime you want to see the instrument panel. This can quickly get annoying especially with mutiple effects and synths. Most importantly, it didn't recognise Trilogy or BFD. These are old plugins, but they are far superior to the instruments included with Samplitude. Updating to BFD3 is not an option (no upgrade deals anymore from BFD1) and I'm putting off an upgrade of Trilogy till I can justify it, so that was a deal breaker for me. Spectral Layers etc.. seems very similar to the Ozone tools I already own. Even Cool Edit Pro can do a lot of what Spectral Layers does. It's a great bundle, but, on reflection, I just can't justify buying everything for the sake of a few tools. Finally, I checked out all the demos of the instruments included and haven't heard anything better than what's on Rapture or Dimensions, and certainly not better than the Kontakt packs I've already bought. So, despite the amazing financial discount. I'll be passing on this deal too. I really wanted to get excited about Samplitude, but I just couldn't.
Cakewalk by Bandlab, Sonar Platinum Lifetimer, Windows 10, HP Laptop, CPU i5, RAM 8GB. Audio interface: Edirol FA-101 Firewire interface with moded drivers. Microphones: Audio-Technica, M-Audio, Behringer, AKG. Pianos: Casio digital, Yamaha B1 upright. Guitars: Dobro, Tanglewood, Danelectro, Fender. Hats: Fez Check out my music : https://53mph.bandcamp.com/album/like-water-to-the-sand
|
riojazz
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1337
- Joined: 2004/02/26 13:23:02
- Location: Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
- Status: offline
Registration problem SOLVED
2018/01/14 15:48:51
(permalink)
I liked the Samplitude demo well enough to purchase the deal on the Pro Suite. They processed my order and sent an email with serial numbers but the number is a P2 number, which I understand to be for Samplitude P2 (not the current P3). I assume there will be some process for them to verify my SONAR ownership and then they will send me the P3 number. It's a weekend, so I'm waiting. Does this sound right to those who did purchase the crossgrade at $149? SOLVED. I tried again (third time) and this time, instead of the registration window clearing, it continued, asked for my email address, and worked. I'm all set.
post edited by riojazz - 2018/01/14 23:42:08
Software: Cakewalk by Bandlab; Adobe Audition; Band-in-A-Box audiophile; Izotope Ozone; Encore; Melodyne; Win 10 Pro, 64-bit. Hardware: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 2nd; Roland Integra-7; TCE Finalizer; Presonus Central Station, Behringer X-Touch. Home built i7 with 16 GB RAM, SSDs.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Samplitude - my experiences so far
2018/01/14 16:04:05
(permalink)
The deal is not SONAR specific. The serial numbers issued are for the latest version of the X3 Suite
|