Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'?

Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Author
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:23:59 (permalink)
drewfx1


but there are more important things in the world to get really upset about.

See John's fred.


#31
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:25:38 (permalink)
bapu


drewfx1


but there are more important things in the world to get really upset about.

See John's fred.

THread!!
 
It's THREAD FFS.

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#32
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:26:47 (permalink)

No wonder John's getting his panties up in a bunch.

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#33
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:33:32 (permalink)
(It) Must be difficult for him to find a place to set.

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#34
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:37:13 (permalink)

Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#35
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:39:35 (permalink)
SteveStrummerUK


bapu


drewfx1


but there are more important things in the world to get really upset about.

See John's fred.

THread!!
 
It's THREAD FFS.

I no. I said FRED!!
#36
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8256
  • Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:40:18 (permalink)
drewfx1


I suppose someone should point out that grammar is not there for it's (  ) own sake, but to foster communication.

So it doesn't make to ( ) much sense to me to get more than a little upset over situations where the meaning is clear even if the grammar is incorrect. 

Minor frustration is one thing, but there are more important things in the world to get really upset about.

In all seriousness, the meaning is often not clear. It requires deciphering and that tends to not foster communication, but inhibit it IMO. The English language already has enough oddities without adding to it. Really bad grammar or spelling tends to make me not bother to read, or... worse yet, begin to write the person off as a dolt. If they cannot write at a grade 2 level, how good is their reading comprehension, or, how much education/experience does this person even have (and believe me, I have questioned the reading comprehension abilities of more than one person here)? If it is just laziness... well I cannot respect that either (I mean, seriously, how hard is it to check these days?).

That being said, I am trying to reduce my own feelings about such things. Getting upset over anything only harms me, so its much easier to just try not to.

A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything.

Composers Forum
#37
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 16:52:29 (permalink)
foxwolfen


drewfx1


I suppose someone should point out that grammar is not there for it's (  ) own sake, but to foster communication.

So it doesn't make to ( ) much sense to me to get more than a little upset over situations where the meaning is clear even if the grammar is incorrect. 

Minor frustration is one thing, but there are more important things in the world to get really upset about.

In all seriousness, the meaning is often not clear. It requires deciphering and that tends to not foster communication, but inhibit it IMO. The English language already has enough oddities without adding to it. Really bad grammar or spelling tends to make me not bother to read, or... worse yet, begin to write the person off as a dolt. If they cannot write at a grade 2 level, how good is their reading comprehension, or, how much education/experience does this person even have (and believe me, I have questioned the reading comprehension abilities of more than one person here)? If it is just laziness... well I cannot respect that either (I mean, seriously, how hard is it to check these days?).

That being said, I am trying to reduce my own feelings about such things. Getting upset over anything only harms me, so its much easier to just try not to.

 
Shad, my theory has always been that people reading anything I write are doing me a favour, not the other way round. So I take the trouble to at least try and use proper grammar, appropriate punctuation and correct spelling to make it as easier on the eye.
 
To me, not taking a little care over what one types isn't just lazy, it shows a lack of respect.
 
 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#38
Karyn
Ma-Ma
  • Total Posts : 9200
  • Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
  • Location: Lincoln, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 17:53:14 (permalink)
foxwolfen

In all seriousness, the meaning is often not clear. It requires deciphering and that tends to not foster communication, but inhibit it IMO. The English language already has enough oddities without adding to it. Really bad grammar or spelling tends to make me not bother to read, or... worse yet, begin to write the person off as a dolt. If they cannot write at a grade 2 level, how good is their reading comprehension, or, how much education/experience does this person even have (and believe me, I have questioned the reading comprehension abilities of more than one person here)? If it is just laziness... well I cannot respect that either (I mean, seriously, how hard is it to check these days?).
What is it you're trying to say?

Mekashi Futo
Get 10% off all Waves plugins.
Current DAW.  i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum

#39
marcos69
Max Output Level: -26 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4950
  • Joined: 2004/11/05 21:44:33
  • Location: Between my guitar and amp
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:01:41 (permalink)
Karyn


foxwolfen

In all seriousness, the meaning is often not clear. It requires deciphering and that tends to not foster communication, but inhibit it IMO. The English language already has enough oddities without adding to it. Really bad grammar or spelling tends to make me not bother to read, or... worse yet, begin to write the person off as a dolt. If they cannot write at a grade 2 level, how good is their reading comprehension, or, how much education/experience does this person even have (and believe me, I have questioned the reading comprehension abilities of more than one person here)? If it is just laziness... well I cannot respect that either (I mean, seriously, how hard is it to check these days?).
What is it you're trying to say?


He's trying to be all seriousness.  He's already lost most of his audience.

Mark Wessels

At CD Baby

At Soundclick
#40
dmbaer
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
  • Location: Concord CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:07:16 (permalink)
spacey

Funny how little quirks can bother one...

I cringe when someone answers, " do you mind if I...?" with, "sure, go ahead".
Is it they do mind but go ahead or that they don't mind?

I have to suppress rolling my eyes in an obvious manner whenever someone says:
 
"Can I ask you a question?". 

#41
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8256
  • Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:11:53 (permalink)
SteveStrummerUK


foxwolfen


drewfx1


I suppose someone should point out that grammar is not there for it's (  ) own sake, but to foster communication.

So it doesn't make to ( ) much sense to me to get more than a little upset over situations where the meaning is clear even if the grammar is incorrect. 

Minor frustration is one thing, but there are more important things in the world to get really upset about.

In all seriousness, the meaning is often not clear. It requires deciphering and that tends to not foster communication, but inhibit it IMO. The English language already has enough oddities without adding to it. Really bad grammar or spelling tends to make me not bother to read, or... worse yet, begin to write the person off as a dolt. If they cannot write at a grade 2 level, how good is their reading comprehension, or, how much education/experience does this person even have (and believe me, I have questioned the reading comprehension abilities of more than one person here)? If it is just laziness... well I cannot respect that either (I mean, seriously, how hard is it to check these days?).

That being said, I am trying to reduce my own feelings about such things. Getting upset over anything only harms me, so its much easier to just try not to.

 
Shad, my theory has always been that people reading anything I write are doing me a favour, not the other way round. So I take the trouble to at least try and use proper grammar, appropriate punctuation and correct spelling to make it as easier on the eye.
 
To me, not taking a little care over what one types isn't just lazy, it shows a lack of respect.
 
 

+1 - Well said.

A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything.

Composers Forum
#42
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 41704
  • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
  • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:15:58 (permalink)
dmbaer


spacey

Funny how little quirks can bother one...

I cringe when someone answers, " do you mind if I...?" with, "sure, go ahead".
Is it they do mind but go ahead or that they don't mind?

I have to suppress rolling my eyes in an obvious manner whenever someone says:
 
"Can I ask you a question?". 

Good replies are:
 
- You just did
- Yes, at a dollar apiece and that counts as one
- Do I have to answer?
- Can I ask you to get lost?
- No.
 
 

 
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
#43
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:22:01 (permalink)
craigb


dmbaer


spacey

Funny how little quirks can bother one...

I cringe when someone answers, " do you mind if I...?" with, "sure, go ahead".
Is it they do mind but go ahead or that they don't mind?

I have to suppress rolling my eyes in an obvious manner whenever someone says:
 
"Can I ask you a question?". 

Good replies are:
 
- Yes, at a $4,565 plus conversion fees and tax apiece and that counts as one
 
 

Bouyed.

I even simplified the list.

I can't say fairer than that.


"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#44
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:35:08 (permalink)
OK, I think I get it now:

Someone who has something to say and says it with incorrect grammar is "disrespectful".

Someone who says, "I don't give a  %$^& *^$%^ about your ideas because you said it incorrectly!" is being "respectful".

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#45
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:52:56 (permalink)
drewfx1


OK, I think I get it now:

Someone who has something to say and says it with incorrect grammar is "disrespectful".

Someone who says, "I don't give a  %$^& *^$%^ about your ideas because you said it incorrectly!" is being "respectful".

Ideas are plural and it is singular.


That's disrespectful, no?
#46
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:58:54 (permalink)
bapu


drewfx1


OK, I think I get it now:

Someone who has something to say and says it with incorrect grammar is "disrespectful".

Someone who says, "I don't give a  %$^& *^$%^ about your ideas because you said it incorrectly!" is being "respectful".

Ideas are plural and it is singular.


That's disrespectful, no?

Perhaps. But if I say "I don't give a  %$^& *^$%^!", then that makes it respectful, roight?

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#47
alexoosthoek
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5238
  • Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
  • Location: A'gus
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 19:59:43 (permalink)
Pls remember not all of us use English or American as first language :)


The CHB
Some Live Demo's


Various ADK computers   and some thingy's
Have fun!
#48
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 20:23:20 (permalink)
I do Alex and you are a fantastic example of how a warm heart can permeate the limitations of language.

Actually this thread has brought up something in me that has been an increasing concern and has in fact been causing some alarm.  My ability to write to the standard I have enjoyed for many years is in steady and alarming decline.

I'm constantly getting fundamental things like 'i' and 'e' the wrong way round I often find that I'm repeating words in very redundant ways and all sorts of things like that I used to take for granted are taking longer and longer to figure out.

I don't think my intelligence or respect for my readers is diminishing but my ability to write without increasingly more read throughs is failing pretty quickly and I ain't joking.

I've known many great writers over the years whose technical grasp of language has been average and even very poor but what made them great was the ability to convey meaning through the written word and tell great tales, I've also known plenty of able writers who have had impressive vocabularies a strong grasp of grammar and spelling that have had nothing to say but have been long-winded about saying it.

Things like 'should of' yes ought to be 'should have' and like most here I get mildly irritated by some of them but there are circumstances in education, dialects, personal styles that lead to many as many quirks in expressing the written word as there are people writing.

The important over-riding thing to me is if  I can actually understand what is being said.

I'm also thinking it isn't going to be long before I can't make any sense of what I've just written at this rate and I'm wondering how I'll end up being judged as a result.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/03/30 20:42:38

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#49
alexoosthoek
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5238
  • Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
  • Location: A'gus
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 20:37:53 (permalink)
Jon, thanks for getting my point :)

I'm not sure what you are saying here?




Btw: mail is sort of on it's way, writing in English about things I even don't really get in Dutch does take some time.

The CHB
Some Live Demo's


Various ADK computers   and some thingy's
Have fun!
#50
alexoosthoek
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5238
  • Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
  • Location: A'gus
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 20:39:07 (permalink)
Had to log in again to post this

The CHB
Some Live Demo's


Various ADK computers   and some thingy's
Have fun!
#51
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 20:44:04 (permalink)
alexoosthoek


Jon, thanks for getting my point :)

I'm not sure what you are saying here?




Btw: mail is sort of on it's way, writing in English about things I even don't really get in Dutch does take some time.


I think I'm saying I'm getting old and going bats...

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#52
alexoosthoek
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5238
  • Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
  • Location: A'gus
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 20:53:51 (permalink)
Jonbouy


alexoosthoek


Jon, thanks for getting my point :)

I'm not sure what you are saying here?




Btw: mail is sort of on it's way, writing in English about things I even don't really get in Dutch does take some time.


I think I'm saying I'm getting old and going bats...


Don't do that pls, we need you here.

The CHB
Some Live Demo's


Various ADK computers   and some thingy's
Have fun!
#53
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 21:18:58 (permalink)
Jonbouy


I do Alex and you are a fantastic example of how a warm heart can permeate the limitations of language.

Actually this thread has brought up something in me that has been an increasing concern and has in fact been causing some alarm.  My ability to write to the standard I have enjoyed for many years is in steady and alarming decline.

I'm constantly getting fundamental things like 'i' and 'e' the wrong way round I often find that I'm repeating words in very redundant ways and all sorts of things like that I used to take for granted are taking longer and longer to figure out.

I don't think my intelligence or respect for my readers is diminishing but my ability to write without increasingly more read throughs is failing pretty quickly and I ain't joking.

I've known many great writers over the years whose technical grasp of language has been average and even very poor but what made them great was the ability to convey meaning through the written word and tell great tales, I've also known plenty of able writers who have had impressive vocabularies a strong grasp of grammar and spelling that have had nothing to say but have been long-winded about saying it.

Things like 'should of' yes ought to be 'should have' and like most here I get mildly irritated by some of them but there are circumstances in education, dialects, personal styles that lead to many as many quirks in expressing the written word as there are people writing.

The important over-riding thing to me is if  I can actually understand what is being said.

I'm also thinking it isn't going to be long before I can't make any sense of what I've just written at this rate and I'm wondering how I'll end up being judged as a result.

Jon,


My spelling is pretty bad. My typing skills are of the hunt-and-peck variety. Yes, I'm a programmer and I type pretty fast when doing that. Thanks be to compilers and syntax checkers.


Yes, I have spell checker here in Chrome.


Problem is, I am getting old(er) and I too sense the execution slipping away. So much so that I went to the doctor over a year ago about it. She put me on a steroid/hormone treatment and it's 20%-40% better (no pun in 10 did, really).


What I will admit here is that ideas flow faster than the fingers can handle. Brain is in 4th gear and the hands are in 2nd (maybe). Then with the desire to move on I do not always take the time to re-read what I've read with the intensity of submitting an important report or software release. IOW, this is the fun stuff and I may be, at times, as Strummy says, a bit lazy. But it is, in my opinion, never meant as being disrespectful.
#54
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8256
  • Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 21:43:46 (permalink)
bapu


Jonbouy


I do Alex and you are a fantastic example of how a warm heart can permeate the limitations of language.

Actually this thread has brought up something in me that has been an increasing concern and has in fact been causing some alarm.  My ability to write to the standard I have enjoyed for many years is in steady and alarming decline.

I'm constantly getting fundamental things like 'i' and 'e' the wrong way round I often find that I'm repeating words in very redundant ways and all sorts of things like that I used to take for granted are taking longer and longer to figure out.

I don't think my intelligence or respect for my readers is diminishing but my ability to write without increasingly more read throughs is failing pretty quickly and I ain't joking.

I've known many great writers over the years whose technical grasp of language has been average and even very poor but what made them great was the ability to convey meaning through the written word and tell great tales, I've also known plenty of able writers who have had impressive vocabularies a strong grasp of grammar and spelling that have had nothing to say but have been long-winded about saying it.

Things like 'should of' yes ought to be 'should have' and like most here I get mildly irritated by some of them but there are circumstances in education, dialects, personal styles that lead to many as many quirks in expressing the written word as there are people writing.

The important over-riding thing to me is if  I can actually understand what is being said.

I'm also thinking it isn't going to be long before I can't make any sense of what I've just written at this rate and I'm wondering how I'll end up being judged as a result.

Jon,


My spelling is pretty bad. My typing skills are of the hunt-and-peck variety. Yes, I'm a programmer and I type pretty fast when doing that. Thanks be to compilers and syntax checkers.


Yes, I have spell checker here in Chrome.


Problem is, I am getting old(er) and I too sense the execution slipping away. So much so that I went to the doctor over a year ago about it. She put me on a steroid/hormone treatment and it's 20%-40% better (no pun in 10 did, really).


What I will admit here is that ideas flow faster than the fingers can handle. Brain is in 4th gear and the hands are in 2nd (maybe). Then with the desire to move on I do not always take the time to re-read what I've read with the intensity of submitting an important report or software release. IOW, this is the fun stuff and I may be, at times, as Strummy says, a bit lazy. But it is, in my opinion, never meant as being disrespectful.


Jon, I have noticed a similar decline in my own writing. I have actually put some thought to it. My belief is it is due to over-saturation in written media. As it becomes more and more prevalent in my life, I also become more and more distracted. It has become so routine that I am putting less and less direct focus on it, while still participating at the same level. And that leads to errors. So, one might think it odd to force oneself to slow down at my age, but that is what I am trying to do: pay more attention to fewer things. Kinda like my sig I guess

A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything.

Composers Forum
#55
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 21:54:25 (permalink)
For some reason I find I make most of my stupidest mistakes (as opposed to the merely stupid ones) when I go back and edit or rephrase what I've already written. And sometimes I just write the wrong word for unknown reasons. 

And I think most people are more likely unaware, unskilled, uneducated or mis-educated in grammar than they are intentionally disrespectful.

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#56
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 41704
  • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
  • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/30 22:05:13 (permalink)
bapu


Jonbouy


I do Alex and you are a fantastic example of how a warm heart can permeate the limitations of language.

Actually this thread has brought up something in me that has been an increasing concern and has in fact been causing some alarm.  My ability to write to the standard I have enjoyed for many years is in steady and alarming decline.

I'm constantly getting fundamental things like 'i' and 'e' the wrong way round I often find that I'm repeating words in very redundant ways and all sorts of things like that I used to take for granted are taking longer and longer to figure out.

I don't think my intelligence or respect for my readers is diminishing but my ability to write without increasingly more read throughs is failing pretty quickly and I ain't joking.

I've known many great writers over the years whose technical grasp of language has been average and even very poor but what made them great was the ability to convey meaning through the written word and tell great tales, I've also known plenty of able writers who have had impressive vocabularies a strong grasp of grammar and spelling that have had nothing to say but have been long-winded about saying it.

Things like 'should of' yes ought to be 'should have' and like most here I get mildly irritated by some of them but there are circumstances in education, dialects, personal styles that lead to many as many quirks in expressing the written word as there are people writing.

The important over-riding thing to me is if  I can actually understand what is being said.

I'm also thinking it isn't going to be long before I can't make any sense of what I've just written at this rate and I'm wondering how I'll end up being judged as a result.

Jon,


My spelling is pretty bad. My typing skills are of the hunt-and-peck variety. Yes, I'm a programmer and I type pretty fast when doing that. Thanks be to compilers and syntax checkers.


Yes, I have spell checker here in Chrome.


Problem is, I am getting old(er) and I too sense the execution slipping away. So much so that I went to the doctor over a year ago about it. She put me on a steroid/hormone treatment and it's 20%-40% better (no pun in 10 did, really).


What I will admit here is that ideas flow faster than the fingers can handle. Brain is in 4th gear and the hands are in 2nd (maybe). Then with the desire to move on I do not always take the time to re-read what I've read with the intensity of submitting an important report or software release. IOW, this is the fun stuff and I may be, at times, as Strummy says, a bit lazy. But it is, in my opinion, never meant as being disrespectful.


Got it.

 
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
#57
jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 21760
  • Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
  • Location: SW Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/31 10:04:26 (permalink)
Jonbouy


Actually this thread has brought up something in me that has been an increasing concern and has in fact been causing some alarm.  My ability to write to the standard I have enjoyed for many years is in steady and alarming decline.

I'm constantly getting fundamental things like 'i' and 'e' the wrong way round I often find that I'm repeating words in very redundant ways and all sorts of things like that I used to take for granted are taking longer and longer to figure out.

I don't think my intelligence or respect for my readers is diminishing but my ability to write without increasingly more read throughs is failing pretty quickly and I ain't joking.


Absolutely agree JB...that's been happening to me over the last few years. I'm wondering if it's due to the fact that I very, very rarely, write anything in 'long-hand' nowadays. There must be a certain amount of 'muscle-memory' with correct spelling..?

 
Jyemz
 
 
 



Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
#58
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/31 11:38:21 (permalink)
 
My apologies for using 'disrespectful' in that context - it wasn't the right word to use to convey what I meant to say.
 
I guess what I was trying to say (in one word) was sort of like "if I can't be bothered to type something legible, then why should anyone else be bothered to read it".
 
And I fully appreciate that English isn't everyone's first language around here, and I think I'm always the first to take that into account.
 
But having said that, I still like to think there is a case for correct grammar, even on an internet forum. And definitely on a website advertising and promoting one's business - in these cases I still think it's unforgivable not to go through some sort of proof-reading exercise.
 
post edited by SteveStrummerUK - 2012/03/31 11:40:08

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#59
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Should I of have said that it's 'should have' not 'should of'? 2012/03/31 11:44:08 (permalink)
SteveStrummerUK


in these cases I still think it's unforgivable not to go through some sort of proof-reading exercise.
 

Agreed. I need to do more of this my own self as I pointed out above.
#60
Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1