Helpful ReplyThe Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread

Page: < 12345 > Showing page 2 of 5
Author
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 15:38:30 (permalink)
There is no option to enable the feature in the stand alone version of Rapture, for instance. I just checked.

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#31
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 15:40:44 (permalink)
No it will only work inside Sonar as its a Sonar feature that shows up in the plugin.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#32
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 15:43:59 (permalink)
scook
The Windows menu is being modified dynamically by the SONAR. It is not something that persists outside of SONAR. The option has to be associated with the plug-in because it affects how SONAR needs to treat the plug-in. It does not mean the plug-in itself is modified in any way. The setting and menu option to maintain the setting only exists within the SONAR environment.


Yes I understand all those points. Thanks. I'll leave it there.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#33
Sycraft
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 871
  • Joined: 2012/05/04 21:06:10
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 16:28:48 (permalink)
John
Why would there be a problem with the way its always been? Where is the oversampling meaningful, in what pert of the spectrum? I am a bit doubtful as to its necessity. 


It shouldn't be necessary for properly designed plugins, but many aren't. Basically anything that messes with dynamics (including EQs) need to be oversampled. By the very nature of the processing, new high frequency harmonics will be introduced. In a band limited system, which digital sampling of course is, that will then alias back down to lower frequency content. Only way around that is to oversample, and filter, which is the right way to do it.
 
Now as to if this will matter, well depends on the content, the plugin used, and the magnitude of the change. It certainly can. There are plenty of cases where you can toggle oversampling and easily hear a difference.
 
This basically just lets you force that using the host for plugins that won't do it.
#34
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 16:38:48 (permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey
 
How do we know which plugs do & which ones don't?

 
Generally a plugin will either have "upsampling" or "quality" settings or something like that, or it will be mentioned in the plugin's documentation or marketing spiel that it oversamples/upsamples internally. 
 
 
 
It's been mentioned that the feature works best on material with a fair bit of HF detail.
 
So..... what if I'm using the same synth for 2 different uses - one for bass & one for percussion? Think Dim Pro etc.




Barring bugs or incompatibilities, I wouldn't expect it to make things worse in the many cases where it offered no benefit (unless you were deliberately going for a grungier sound). It would basically just waste a bunch of CPU processing at a higher rate and then filtering out stuff that isn't there in the first place.


 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#35
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 16:41:45 (permalink)
Anderton
Next time I'm having you write the eZine copy 

 


 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#36
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4294
  • Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 16:54:24 (permalink)
Getting away from the 'some plugins'.... Which plugins?
 
Ta.

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
#37
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 17:26:06 (permalink)
drewfx1
 
 
Barring bugs or incompatibilities, I wouldn't expect it to make things worse in the many cases where it offered no benefit (unless you were deliberately going for a grungier sound). It would basically just waste a bunch of CPU processing at a higher rate and then filtering out stuff that isn't there in the first place.


This is along the same lines as my thinking. I am at present unconvinced. I have been quite happy with the output for all the synths I use. I have never thought "gee this would sound better with oversampling".
 
 

Best
John
#38
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4294
  • Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 17:34:13 (permalink)
Well if proven to work it seems to me a key feature missing (understandable as this is the first iteration) is the ability to set this override on certain plugins as a default (this could be specified in plugin manager) so everytime a particular plugin is used the setting is ticked. Set and forget if you like.

A list of plugins that may benefit from this setting could be compiled too (would probably take a community effort) and these lists could be imported. However this still leads to the question... Which plugins?

Still I wish more time was spent on existing pre Platinum features.
post edited by Doktor Avalanche - 2015/06/30 17:41:59

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
#39
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 17:38:57 (permalink)
The setting is persistent across sessions and projects.
#40
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4294
  • Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 17:41:28 (permalink)
WelI this is what I mean.. start a new project, insert plugin X and it defaults to on. Insert plugin Y and it defaults to off. How this gets defined is in plugin manager...
post edited by Doktor Avalanche - 2015/06/30 17:48:41

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
#41
Spencer
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 299
  • Joined: 2005/06/21 00:12:35
  • Location: Montréal, QC
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 17:51:02 (permalink)
Hmm.
 
There's a synth, AAS String Studio, with which I use a dll wrapper called vstOversampler. You can fish the thing out on gearslutz if curious. It makes a drastic, night & day difference. We're talking can't even recognize the patch. Thing is, since it's so different, if the oversampling were to be only applied at the bouncing stage, I wouldn't know at all what the sound would come out like. I wonder how often this would be a concern.
#42
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:24:52 (permalink)
Doktor Avalanche
WelI this is what I mean.. start a new project, insert plugin X and it defaults to on. Insert plugin Y and it defaults to off. How this gets defined is in plugin manager...



Unless I'm misunderstanding you that's how it works, except that instead of checking it in the plug-in manager, you check it in the effect itself...which come to think of it is more efficient, because presumably you'll have the plug-in GUI and don't have to go open the plug-in manager and call up the effect. If you've chosen the option to upsample, it will remain set to upsample whenever you insert the plug-in into any project.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#43
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:25:24 (permalink)
Spencer
Hmm.
 
There's a synth, AAS String Studio, with which I use a dll wrapper called vstOversampler. You can fish the thing out on gearslutz if curious. It makes a drastic, night & day difference. We're talking can't even recognize the patch. Thing is, since it's so different, if the oversampling were to be only applied at the bouncing stage, I wouldn't know at all what the sound would come out like. I wonder how often this would be a concern.



You can freeze to check it out.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#44
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4294
  • Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:35:49 (permalink)
Anderton
Doktor Avalanche
WelI this is what I mean.. start a new project, insert plugin X and it defaults to on. Insert plugin Y and it defaults to off. How this gets defined is in plugin manager...



Unless I'm misunderstanding you that's how it works, except that instead of checking it in the plug-in manager, you check it in the effect itself...which come to think of it is more efficient, because presumably you'll have the plug-in GUI and don't have to go open the plug-in manager and call up the effect. If you've chosen the option to upsample, it will remain set to upsample whenever you insert the plug-in into any project.


Sounds good but...

Ok so what happens if I've changed some plugin settings on a new project.

Then next week I decide to bring up another project which is the final mix of a project I was working on last year. Just so happens I'm using the same plugins.... Will I have lost my mix?

Another scenario...

I'm working on Sonar at Abbey Roach studios today using Sonar. Fred is using the same studio tomorrow and inadvertantly changes the settings. We are working on seperate projects. I'm back in the studio the next day...
post edited by Doktor Avalanche - 2015/06/30 18:42:28

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
#45
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:41:06 (permalink)
buh?
 
And for all these years I was under the impression that working above 48khz was useless cork sniffery... or so I was told.
 
So I dropped down my working samplerates from 96khz to 48. This was wrong?
 
Well at least now I know and have a solution to the "problem". Good thing I haven't gone all in on some of my more important projects yet at 48k. I'm assuming due to the ultra wacky nature of the plugs/sounds I like I am just the sort of dude this would affect (drum samples, amp sims, bass synths... oof).
#46
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:43:55 (permalink)
Doktor Avalanche
Ok so what happens if I've changed some plugin settings on a new project.

Then next week I decide to bring up another project which is the final mix of a project I was working on last year. Just so happens I'm using the same plugins.... Will I have lost my mix?

 
Depends on whether using upsampling makes a huge difference in the sound. So I think what you're asking for is a "disable all upsampling" button, right? Only problem with that is if you forget which plug-ins really benefit from it...so maybe what you want is presets of which plug-ins do or do not resample.
 
However if your experience is like mine, you'll find it's needed for a limited number of plug-ins, and the improvement in sound quality will tend to make you want to leave it on once you've identified "suspect" plugs.

Another scenario...

I'm working on Sonar at Abbey Roach studios today using Sonar. Fred is using the same studio tomorrow and inadvertantly changes the settings. We are working on seperate projects. I'm back in the studio the next day...

 
Well, that's an easy one: tell Fred to keep his effing hands off your computer.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#47
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:46:49 (permalink)
aaand now I have a question...
 
If 48 is what is needed to accurately capture sound that humans can hear (20khz x 2 to satisfy that Nyquist fellow plus a bit extra for good measure) what does that mean once it starts interacting with some of these fancier plugins?
 
Is audio that's recorded at 48khz going to interact with a 96khz plug the same way an audio file recorded at 96khz is?
 
To put it more simply... should I go back to sniffing corks?
#48
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:49:21 (permalink)
In theory, at the higher sampling rate the foldover distortion is out of the audio range. So that's why you don't hear it.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#49
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4294
  • Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:49:46 (permalink)
Well I don't know of any global settings that can get changed in Sonar, that can alter sound, other than via preferences and plugin manager. Correct me if I'm wrong? Plenty of studios share DAW computers as you know...
post edited by Doktor Avalanche - 2015/06/30 18:57:06

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
#50
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 18:50:00 (permalink)
I think you mean 20 Hz to 24 kHz beep. 

Best
John
#51
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 19:09:32 (permalink)
Beepster
buh?
 
And for all these years I was under the impression that working above 48khz was useless cork sniffery... or so I was told.
 
So I dropped down my working samplerates from 96khz to 48. This was wrong?



There's a difference between recording/playing back and DSP processing.
 
Some types of processing benefits from being done at a higher sample rate, and hence many, many plugins that use such processing already do the upsampling internally themselves. But for various reasons some plugs might not do this internally even though they really should, so now Sonar has a feature that allows one to address this.

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#52
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 19:17:56 (permalink)
John
drewfx1
 
 
Barring bugs or incompatibilities, I wouldn't expect it to make things worse in the many cases where it offered no benefit (unless you were deliberately going for a grungier sound). It would basically just waste a bunch of CPU processing at a higher rate and then filtering out stuff that isn't there in the first place.


This is along the same lines as my thinking. I am at present unconvinced. I have been quite happy with the output for all the synths I use. I have never thought "gee this would sound better with oversampling".
 
 


 
I suspect that in the more obvious cases we would just naturally choose not to use plugins that sound "bad" because of the problems this addresses.
 
But in some cases, for some people it will be of benefit.

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#53
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 19:35:25 (permalink)
Anderton
For example with drums, foldover distortion might make the sound appear "fatter" so removing the distortion sounds subjectively less desirable.

 
Oddly enough there are cases where the oversampling can make a sound fatter. You just have to try it and see.
My theory for why that might happen is that the foldover distortion can potentially result in phase cancellation of low/mid frequencies. When you upsample there is no distortion so the original low mid's are preserved.
I noticed this when trying it  on the SI electric piano, something I wouldn't have expected upsampling to make a difference on. 
 
I'm definitely interested in hearing reports of peoples experiments. Perhaps we can compile a list of plugins that benefit positively from upsampling.

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#54
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 19:45:32 (permalink)
lfm
I just noticed - helpfile says there is to be a field in plugin manager for this render-options - but it's not in my install anyway.

 
Thats an error in the help - we had originally planned for it to be there but it didn't make sense..

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#55
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 20:03:12 (permalink)
Doktor Avalanche
Well I don't know of any global settings that can get changed in Sonar, that can alter sound, other than via preferences and plugin manager. Correct me if I'm wrong? Plenty of studios share DAW computers as you know...



If you have a multi user setup and care about someone changing your settings, you shouldn't be sharing the same user profile. That said all the resampling settings are stored in aud.ini (which is per user) so you can easily backup and restore the config settings if you need to. And even latency settings can "alter sound". There are some plugins that sound different at different buffer sizes. 
post edited by Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk] - 2015/06/30 20:10:29

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#56
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 20:23:25 (permalink)
I understand we now have up sampling when needed but why this feature instead of so many other things that have been requested.
Or was this something easily done on the road to another feature down the track some time?

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#57
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/06/30 21:18:00 (permalink)
mudgel
I understand we now have up sampling when needed but why this feature instead of so many other things that have been requested.
Or was this something easily done on the road to another feature down the track some time?



Not speaking for Cakewalk here, but it seems to me that since the 64-bit engine introduction, all the improvements have related to workflow or functionality. This is the first one I can think of since then that improves a DAW's actual sound quality. Granted it's relevant only to those who do "in the box" productions with plug-ins, but I would think that's a pretty hefty percentage of the user base.
 
As to "easy to do," I think in principle it seems easy to do, but when you dig into it there are other considerations - like what happens with automation when you double the sample rate for processing. I don't think it was something Noel did on his lunch hour but with him, you never know 

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#58
slartabartfast
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5289
  • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
  • Status: offline
Re: The Foxboro Plug-In Upsampling Thread 2015/07/01 04:33:26 (permalink)
Presumably someone designed the plugin. Perhaps he had enough understanding of digital signal processing to make that design, efficient, if not accurate to the result he had intended. Part of his design process might have been to design in upsampling where he felt that it would benefit the result of the anti-aliasing filters he also built in, or perhaps he was too stupid or lazy, or too concerned about the performance hit it would take. In any case, those filters would have been designed to work at the frequency he expected to encounter in the input to the plugin. Does it follow that providing his plugin with input frequencies beyond their design range will improve the performance of what might have been a delicately tuned system? If the result of providing an extreme oversampling at the input stage does produce an audible difference, does that indicate that doing so has resulted in a more accurate signal processing output?
#59
Tom Riggs
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1752
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 22:47:26
  • Location: Displaced Kansan living in Philippines
  • Status: offline
Which Sonar included plugs (current or Legacy) benifit from Upsampling? 2015/07/01 04:42:29 (permalink)
Title says it all. I can state that TruePianos benefits from the upsampling. I read that many of the guitar amp sims might benefit but which ones?  I have guitar rig 3 and 4 that came with Sonar versions.
 
 
What about the reverbs, chorus and phasers etc that come with Sonar? Lets make a list of the plugs that seem to be improved by this new feature.
 
 
Thanks

i7-3770k OC at 4.5Ghz, asus p8z77-m, 16g g.skill aries 1600 c9 ram, Noctua d-14 cooler, RME HDSPe Raydat, Motu FastLane, Nvidea GTX 980 ti 6G, windows 7 and 8.1 pro x64. Sonar Platinum and x3e currently installed

My Music 
My YouTube
 
#60
Page: < 12345 > Showing page 2 of 5
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1