onlineeagle
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13
- Joined: 2009/02/02 09:28:07
- Status: offline
Trying to get motorized faders to work with BEHRINGER BCF2000 for ACT
Hi, I assume that the motorized faders are meant to work when using ACT in sonar with the BEHRINGER BCF2000? They work fine when in Mackie emulation mode but when I use ACT the faders stop moving. Everything else seems to work fine. Any ideas?
|
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7360
- Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
- Location: Seattle
- Status: offline
RE: Trying to get motorized faders to work with BEHRINGER BCF2000 for ACT
2009/03/11 16:21:26
(permalink)
IIRC, the ACT surface is not bi-directional. The only way to get that feedback is to use Mackie mode. ACT just needs some attention and a v2.0 to get it up to snuff. Hopefully v9....
=========== The Fog People =========== Intel i7-4790 16GB RAM ASUS Z97 Roland OctaCapture Win10/64 SONAR Platinum 64-bit billions VSTs, some of which work
|
onlineeagle
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13
- Joined: 2009/02/02 09:28:07
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/11 18:11:38
(permalink)
OK then, lets just say I don’t use act after all. The problem is that I can only control tracks one to 8 in Mackie emulation mode. Have you any idea how to tell sonar to be more flexible. For instance, I want to control a plugin using the control surface. So I go in to remote control and click midi learn and tell sonar that I want to control the wet mix of a reverb plugin with my first fader. I can get this to work but I can’t stop the first fader also controlling the volume of track one, which is the default in Mackie emulation mode. I’ve had this control surface for years and I’ve never been able to utilize it fully. I’m off to do more research. Thanks
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/11 18:13:22
(permalink)
dont use act and define it as a control surface in mackie mode. thats the only way it will work correclty. do a search here. Theres a thread that will help you step by step on how to do it Cj
|
InstrEd
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1276
- Joined: 2004/10/13 20:55:03
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/11 18:16:13
(permalink)
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/11 18:53:57
(permalink)
Plugins are fully controllable in Mackie mode but you have to use the plugin mode which by default assigns the controls to the v-pots. You can use the 'flip' mode to use the faders instead if you prefer them. The parameters aren't assignable as such though, they are always assigned sequentially whether you are using faders or v-pots.
|
onlineeagle
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13
- Joined: 2009/02/02 09:28:07
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/11 19:28:44
(permalink)
How do I get the BCF into plugin mode? Do I do this in Sonar or on the BCF? I do however seem to have finally got somewhere. IN Mackie emulation mode I appear to be able to exit from the standard Mackie emulation mode functionality by pressing the exit key on the BCF. Then I can assign midi learn functions in remote control without it changing any previous volume or pan changes previously assigned to that fader or knob. Then it seems I have to close and reopen the project to get original Mackie emulation parameters back. How do I get the BCF into plugin mode? Do I do this in Sonar or on the BCF?
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/11 19:37:11
(permalink)
I meant plugin mode within the Mackie mode (if that makes sense). Put it into mackie mode and then you can control plugins (not softsynths) by pressing 1st shift+track which without an overlay is E1 + Learn. TBH I've never used the BCF in anything other than Mackie mode, mainly because it does everything I need it to in that mode. If you've tried Mackie mode and didn't like it fair enough but if you haven't tried that mode then do. You'll be surprised how much control you get over the whole of Sonar, not just plugins.
|
onlineeagle
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13
- Joined: 2009/02/02 09:28:07
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/12 10:51:32
(permalink)
Hi, I’ve been using mackie mode for years. I was however finding it difficult to control plugins without affecting the standard Mackie features. For instance, if I assigned fader one on the bCF to control “filter cut off†then when I moved that fader it would also affect track one’s volume. I seem to have found a way around that. Do you know of an easy way (other than assigning each individual control) to tell the Bcf to control the second eight tracks as opposed to the first. So in other words, can I press a button that will move on to the next eight tracks and then move back again? I suppose its no big deal if I have to assign things individually but such a button would be quite helpful. Thanks for your help. I tend to find that I get things achieved a lot quicker as soon as I post for help on the forum. I think this is a combination of your excellent help but also a bit of sod’s law. I’ve been trying to sort this for years and then as soon as I post a message on the forum I work it out within five minutes.
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/12 11:43:12
(permalink)
I'm a bit confused about how you are assigning the faders to parameters while in Mackie mode. You shouldn't be able to do that. Mackie mode is set when you switch the unit on to assign Mackie mode for the first time and it stays that way until you change the mode by restarting the BCF while holding down one of the v-pots. Are you sure you are using the Sonar Mackie mode? The LCD display on the BCF should read NCSo when you first turn it on if you are in that mode. The Sonar Mackie mode is assigned by holding down the V-pot 4th from left while turning the unit on. Once you've done that once it will stay in that mode when you turn it on until you change it. In this mode once you control plugins you can't assign the controls to parameters they are preset and apart from moving through the channels and banks or using the flip option there is no control over them. I stress that this only applies to plugins. That is any plugin that is in the effects box. You can't control synths in the synth rack from the Mackie mode so it may not be what you are looking for. Regarding the faders moving to the next 8 tracks, in Mackie emulation mode this is simply done by using the bank buttons. I suspect you may not be in the Sonar Mackie mode, assignment of controls from that mode is impossible.
|
onlineeagle
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13
- Joined: 2009/02/02 09:28:07
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/13 09:21:50
(permalink)
Well, I don’t know how I’ve managed it then since you reccon it can’t be done. Perhaps I am a revolutionary. Perhaps this will be my great achievement in life. I very much doubt it. When I switch the BCF on it flashes up with the firmware number and then what looks like “MC50†or maybe “NC50†- its difficult to read. I’m running it with the Mackie surface selected in sonar and everything is working great. I have full control over remote control features in plugins etc. I can also flit back to the standard set up, I.E. when the first tracks volumes and pans are controlled by the eight faders and knobs, by pressing the button to the left of the "exit" I get back to standard operation.
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/13 11:55:18
(permalink)
That's bizarre. Pressing the button to the left of "exit" should put you into pan mode, so the v-pots control the pan of a track and the faders volume. Do you mean you can assign the faders and v-pots to parameters via ACT when you press it? That is definitely strange behaviour.
|
washburn100
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 110
- Joined: 2008/09/09 15:48:53
- Status: offline
RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/03/24 10:59:46
(permalink)
I recently got a BCF2000 and use it in Mackie emulation mode. If you look at the Behringer website, they have a PDF showing what controls what in Mackie emulation mode. To make things easier I made an overlay/template to use on the BCF2000. I printed it on waterslide decal paper which can be removed without leaving any residue. The labels let me easily see what buttons, especially with the 2 shift controls, to use for which function. I tried attaching the template file I made to this post, but I get a message saying the feature is disabled. If anyone is interested, PM me and I can send it to you.
Write slow, I don't read so fast! Sonar Producer 8 Godin xt-SA, Roland VG-99, Alesis Mastercontrol Intel dual core 2.5 Ghz (overclocked to 3.8Ghz), 4g ram, Nividia 9800Gt
|
somsto75
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 206
- Joined: 2006/12/16 16:10:10
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 21:35:17
(permalink)
Hmm, I tried Plugin mode (which comes up as Pl on the led) using Mackie mode and I dont get how I can control plugins still. Do I use ACT? Or what? Also what is Pl. as opposed to Pl? (without the dot)
|
Blades
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3246
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
- Location: Georgia
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 21:41:21
(permalink)
Part one of my online video doesn't seem to be working, but I do show exactly this bank and track shifting using the buttons on the BCF2000 in Part 2 of the video. The part of the vid expressly shows how to use the BCF in Sonar in Mackie emulation mode, so if you haven't had an opportunity to watch it, please do - it may save you some time trying to figure it out from NO documentation to speak of. HTH
|
somsto75
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 206
- Joined: 2006/12/16 16:10:10
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 21:47:09
(permalink)
hi Blades, i actually did watch it and the standard stuff assigned to mackie mode is super. but the controllin of plugins just isnt workin for me in mackie mode. Im not even sure what to do to get that goin. I dont recall anything about controllin plugins too in depth on your nice vid. Thanks for doin it by the way
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 21:57:50
(permalink)
I have a Mackie Control and I don't use it for controlling plugins. It really is not good at that. An ACT controller is far better. The reason the Mackie is not all that good for controlling plugins is because the setup for a plugin that the MC can control is in the ini file for the MC. It has a few standard ones such as the Sonitus EQ and compressor but a third party one is not going to be recognized. There is a utility or better a text editor that you use to add various plugins but its not worth the trouble when ACT can do a quicker and better job. A small MIDI keyboard controller with a few knobs and faders will do a great job plus it is a keyboard. For controlling Sonar the Mackie can't be beat well perhaps the V700 can.
|
Blades
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3246
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
- Location: Georgia
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 21:58:34
(permalink)
I don't talk about the control of plugins really, because I don'[t really find a lot of use in the unfortunate default layout of parameters. Basically, you go to "plugin mode" while in Mackie Emulation by pressing the button in the four group. Off the top of my head, I don't remember which it is, but if you look at the group of four where the Pan buttone is, pan is lower left, track is upper right. The other two are "dynamics" and "plugins". Dynamics will basically control a compressor inserted (a particular one and it would have to be inserted first, I think). Plugins will let you cycle through the available plugs on the track and control them. There is a Mackie.ini file that describes the effects that are controllable and which parameters line up where - you can edit this. this works for other plugs that are not in the ini file, but it bascally just exposes the available parameters in a completely non-sensical order. With the plugin mode, the control of the Cakewalk FX Reverb is very logical (the sliders control - gasp - the sliders in the GUI). Hope this adds something.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 22:03:41
(permalink)
this works for other plugs that are not in the ini file, but it bascally just exposes the available parameters in a completely non-sensical order. That could be true if you don't have an LCD strip to tell you what knob does what. The Mackie Control has that.
|
Blades
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3246
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
- Location: Georgia
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 22:28:08
(permalink)
Not really the issue here, John. There is a Blue strip that goes on your PC monitor that emulates that Mackie parameter strip (not under anything but WinXP, however as far as I can tell). So you can see the parameters, but they lay out in silly ways - like the first knob might be the enable/disable for the effect, next would be the eq frq, then gain, then Q, then Freq, then gain, then q, then freq - then you'd have to go to another bank - so not-intuitive, learning the layout would take a lot more work than just using the mouse. I'm just making up these exact controls, but it's just like that. It's not just a feedback problem from my perspective - and I'm sure this works basically the same way on an actual Mackie since it's the same emulation - but it's not intuitive like it is for me.
|
somsto75
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 206
- Joined: 2006/12/16 16:10:10
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 22:40:25
(permalink)
Blades, the plugin mode is like what i said above right? It shows up as Pl or Pl. in the LED correct? Also, I was thinking may be i could take the time and just use it as B-control like a generic controller and just customize everything myself with ACT. Would take for ever though i know
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 23:04:53
(permalink)
Blades Not really the issue here, John. There is a Blue strip that goes on your PC monitor that emulates that Mackie parameter strip (not under anything but WinXP, however as far as I can tell). So you can see the parameters, but they lay out in silly ways - like the first knob might be the enable/disable for the effect, next would be the eq frq, then gain, then Q, then Freq, then gain, then q, then freq - then you'd have to go to another bank - so not-intuitive, learning the layout would take a lot more work than just using the mouse. I'm just making up these exact controls, but it's just like that. It's not just a feedback problem from my perspective - and I'm sure this works basically the same way on an actual Mackie since it's the same emulation - but it's not intuitive like it is for me. Everything you say Blades is true except I think that you are dealing with an emulation. The MC has 51 buttons not counting any channel strip or transport buttons or faders. Some of these buttons are for controlling how the MC works with various modes it can be in. It could be a very long post if I went into just what is controlled by different buttons add to that some buttons can be hit more then once to activate a mode that changes the how controls work. Also what is displayed has some control on the MC. When one considers all the possible button combinations that the MC utilizes I wonder just how complete an emulation can be. First even to be close to what the MC can do you would need just as many buttons. They would have to be able to be used in the same combinations and so on. I haven't worked with the Behringer unit so I don't know what it can do. I do know that you have done a lot to make it work well for Sonar users. But I wouldn't think it is as easy to use in a mode it was not built for or with all the hardware that it would need to be an exact copy. In other words I don't think you can compare the two.
|
somsto75
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 206
- Joined: 2006/12/16 16:10:10
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 23:11:30
(permalink)
john i appreciate the sentiment but can we stay on topic because I really need to know if Im keeping this thing or returning it...thanks, I appreciate it
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/03 23:28:11
(permalink)
Well, I'll take my Mackie and go home!
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/04 02:26:42
(permalink)
somsto75 - The best mode to use the BCF in is the Mackie emulation. You can than put it into various 'modes' to control that particular part of Sonar. For example in track mode all the controls relate to the tracks, in plugin mode it's the plugins, et. etc. The difference with the '.' (in all modes not just P) is that with the dot all controls relate to a single track, without it the controls relate to multiple tracks but you need to step through the parameters individually. You'll really need the BCF strip to see what I mean and also make it usable. John is sort of right, you can't access all the various functions that there are on a 'proper' Mackie, I believe there are about 7 or 8 that are not accessible, mainly those related to the non-existent(BCF) jog wheel. All the others are accessed via various key combinations. Have a look at the MAckie help file, get your head around the 'mode' setup and key stroke combinations and then you can really fly. I don't even have an issue with the plugin order of control although without the BCF strip it would be almost unusable. Each button has at least 3 functions assigned to it which are changed via the shift keys - more awkward than the Mackie but then it is several 100 £s cheaper. You pays your money...........
|
somsto75
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 206
- Joined: 2006/12/16 16:10:10
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/04 08:29:39
(permalink)
Yeah I definitely got all that. I understand the different modes and imrunning in mackie emu mode. And I know how to switch to the plugin modes, track modes, etc. WHat Im originally asking is how do I assign controls to plugins when Im in plugin mode? Thats my issue. Once imin plugin mode, what do I do. I know ACT doesnt work. So how do i assign controls when in plugin mode?
post edited by somsto75 - 2009/12/04 08:30:54
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/04 09:48:36
(permalink)
You can't assign individual controls to plugins without using ACT. You are stuck with the way they are pre-assigned in the Mackie mode. If you mean "how do you control 'Plugin X' on track 6" then that is done from "Plugin mode". I'm working from memory here ATM but here's a rough guide assuming that 'Plugin X' is the 3rd plugin on track 6. You need to step through the plugins until the display reads P4. To do this select Plugin 'track' mode so the display reads P1. (note the dot) Also note that P1 is always the EQ, so to control the first plugin on the track you need to select P2. then.... 1. select track 6 so it is the active track using the 'select' button on the relative track 2. Make sure the 'Edit' light on the BCF is lit (when you press the first shift), if not turn it on using shift 1 + edit. 3. Then hold down 'Edit' first then 'Shift 1' at the same time and then.... 4. step through the plugins using the 'track left/right' buttons. THe display should change P2. P3. P4. etc depending on how many plugins you have on the track. P1 always relates to the EQ, P2 the first plugin, P3 the second plugin etc. Obviously if you only have 1 plugin on the track you won't be able to go past P2. 5. To view what rotary/slider controls what parameter on each plugin you really need to have BCFview installed (the virtual LED) - without that it will be difficult to know what you're controlling almost to the point of being impossible to use. I hope this is what you meant and it makes sense. If not post up and I'll try and help further. If you don't know what button controls what go to the Behringer website and you can make up your own template (or use one of theirs) to overlay on the controls.
|
Blades
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3246
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
- Location: Georgia
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/04 10:08:48
(permalink)
If anyone has found a way to make the BCFView application work in Vista/Win7, that would be helpful, as I can't use it on my system right now - so I can't really show what the plugin control would do (provided I could make the time to cover this in a seperate video). You actually COULD use ACT for all of the plugin (and mixer strip) control if you are willing to sacrifice the motorized faders, but I'm guessing they are part of why you bought it. ACT doesn't support the motors (though it's theoretically possible for someone to program an ACT control for it according to a few posts about the SDK - but I don't see any takers and I wouldn't know where to begin). In my case, I use the BCF for mixing stuff and use the non-motorized knobs and sliders on my Edirol PCR-800 keyboard for the ACT control stuff. The Plugin mode on the Mackie emulation would be only able to control a set list of plugs (intuitively, at least), and if those are plugs you use a lot, great. If not, you will have to deal with parameter exposed order or will have to figure out how to code the .ini file for your specific VST. Granted, the same exposed order problem exists within the ACT controller realm as well, but it's pretty easy to reassign stuff for most synths, where the Mackie stuff is tied to that ini file. With regards to what John as submitted, while the Physical Hardware of the Mackie is way different, prettier, and more capable, the BCF does handle most of the modes, and the plugin within Sonar is the Same plugin, so whatever communication is going to the BCF is the same thing that would be going to the MAckie. IOW- there would be no automagical way that the Mackie control would have any better idea how to display fx parameters than the BCF would - you just get to see those parameters on the face of the Mackie itself and have to use less shift-key combos to access them. HTH
|
Blades
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3246
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
- Location: Georgia
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/04 10:58:58
(permalink)
FYI: The MAckieControl.ini resides in the Shared Surfaced folder in the Cakewalk Program files location. As I mentioned above, here is the comment at the top of that file: ; If a plug-in is not defined here, it's parameters will be assigned to the ; VPots in the order that they are presented to SONAR. This file allows the ; order of the parameters to be rearranged and the data type, display format ; and default values to be defined. ; A list of all of the plug-ins defined below. ; [Plugins] 0=FxChorus 1=FxDelay 2=FxEq 3=FxFlange 4=FxReverb 5=CompressorX (Sonar XL) 6=Equalizer (Sonar XL) 7=Track Eq 8=Bus Eq Here's part of the definition for the FXChorus effect that is already programmed: [FxChorus] PluginType=0 NumVPots=27 VPot0=16,level,0.5 ; Voice 1 Gain VPot1=17,level,0.5 ; Voice 2 Gain VPot2=18,level,0.5 ; Voice 3 Gain VPot3=19,level,0.5 ; Voice 4 Gain VPot4=0,level,0.5 ; Voice 1 Delay VPot5=1,level,0.5 ; Voice 2 Delay VPot6=2,level,0.5 ; Voice 3 Delay VPot7=3,level,0.5 ; Voice 4 Delay VPot8=20,level,0.5 ; Mix Level VPot9=21,level,0.5 ; Output Level So you can see it would be a one-time labor to set up a new effect, but certainly not a trivial one. There is a little more documentation within the ini file of how to set it up.
post edited by Blades - 2009/12/04 11:00:11
|
somsto75
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 206
- Joined: 2006/12/16 16:10:10
- Status: offline
Re: RE: BEHRINGER BCF2000 enquiry
2009/12/04 17:37:25
(permalink)
Thanks, I appreciate you guys explaining this. But it seems this thing is probally gona go back. Unless I got another one, there seems more or less to be a compromise made with just one. Either use mackie mode or ACT. But ACT I see I can really share controls between plugins and tracks because whatever setting I leave for one or the other stays there for the other, so u just cant work that way. I just wanted to be able to control track stuff like the way it is in mackie mode, thats nice but then also have an ACT sort of set up for plugins so that any plugin, 3rd part stuff too like freeware or uad, etc I open up in whatever order i'd be able to control according to how I set them up and assign controls to.
|