Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS?

Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Author
Twigman
Max Output Level: -38.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3667
  • Joined: 2006/08/24 04:45:15
  • Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/04 12:32:15 (permalink)
I had Reason and wanted a VST host and a way to record audio.

I got a hooky copy of Cubase SX  and a hooky copy of Sonar4Producer and tested them back to back. I know it's wrong but at least I bought the full version when I had decided what to go for.
Sonar4 seemed so much more intuitive and easy to use than Cubase so I bought Sonar5Producer as that was the current version at the time.

The other guys in my band are Mac & Logic users but I didn't want to buy a Mac and I'm so glad I didn't.

We still manage to swap stems and make music together....they view me as quite odd that I should have a PC and a PConly DAW.

I don't think Sonar is necessarily better than other DAWs - I just found it (v4/5/6/7/8.5) more intuitive than the competition...I have X1 and that is less so than previous incarnations but I have bought in to the Sonar family now and it'll take something even more drastic than X1 to make me invest in a Mac and Logic!! - which is really my only alternative, given what the rest of the guys use.



i did have the original Cubase on an Atari 1040 STE back in the day.......i wonder if anyone is still running that?
post edited by Twigman - 2011/07/04 12:36:33

Become a Fan on Facebook
Buy our stuff on iTunes
Q9550-P5QL-E-8GB1066RAM-GT9800 1GB-RME HDSP9632-W7Prox64-X2x64
#31
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/04 12:41:59 (permalink)
Twigman


which is really my only alternative, given what the rest of the guys use.

Not to nitpick but why is Mac/Logic your only alternative if you *had* t give up SOANR? I mean if you can swap stems with SONAR to the other guys wouldn't you be able to swap stems using Reaper, Studio One or almost any other Brand X on the PC?


I exported WAVs from SOANR into Reaper. And I exported Reaper tracks (different song) as WAVs into SONAR. Worked both ways as designed and expected.


I'd think that as a PC user you have other choices if you *had* to leave SONAR.
 
#32
Twigman
Max Output Level: -38.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3667
  • Joined: 2006/08/24 04:45:15
  • Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/04 12:44:09 (permalink)
I'm saying that coz the other guys swap whole projects between them....which throws up another set of difficulties as I don't think we all have the same plugs...

You are right....but the pressure is on for me to migrate to Mac/logic and all the same plugs as the others......

Become a Fan on Facebook
Buy our stuff on iTunes
Q9550-P5QL-E-8GB1066RAM-GT9800 1GB-RME HDSP9632-W7Prox64-X2x64
#33
Plazma
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 141
  • Joined: 2011/02/12 05:05:49
  • Location: South Africa
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/05 12:08:49 (permalink)
I went into a big music store, and asked for a short demo of all the DAW's. After seeing how much the other ones sucked, I got Sonar.

Sonar X2 Producer. Focusrite Saffire 6, Fender Strat, black PC for recording and mixing. That is all.
#34
sdpate67
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 344
  • Joined: 2008/03/09 09:59:21
  • Location: Charlottetown, PEI
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 00:48:05 (permalink)
I started with Sonar 7 because it was well reviewed, cheaper than Cubase and the Forum was active.

You get stuck in a rut although this spring I tired several other DAWs out of frustration with X1 bugs and general interest. Cubase 6 was cool but it didn't work any better than X1 does now. PT is silly with all those expensive lock ins. Who cares?

Sonar is part of the system I have that works for me. It's awesome for power and flexibility and being a rebel I hate iLok and any kind of dongle.

However, I keep researching other products more for interest than anything else. Love threads like this one.

Asus i7-760 Win 8.1/ Sonar Platinum / Lynx Aurora 16 AES16 / Mackie MCU Pro XT C4 / Millennia Media STT1 x 2 TD-1/ UAD-2 Quad x 2 / Neumann O-300 O-810 U87 KM184 x 2 / Shure 57/58
Reverbnation

NJN Network
#35
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9736
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
  • Location: Las Vegas
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 01:39:53 (permalink)
Twigman


I'm saying that coz the other guys swap whole projects between them....which throws up another set of difficulties as I don't think we all have the same plugs...

You are right....but the pressure is on for me to migrate to Mac/logic and all the same plugs as the others......


As long as one opts for exporting wav files, rendering synths, etc,  there's no reason to switch really. You might as well stick to what you know best as long as it works for you. And, as far as I'm concerned, nothing beats Sonar on the PC side. It has its quirks, but overall, I prefer it to any of the alternatives. 

And unless you collaborate with those people on an ongoing basis, swapping files back and forth all the time, the workaround is ok. 

If it's part of your routine, sure, having the same application helps - being able to save all the projects assets (including sampler instruments and all the rest) to share channel settings, track notes, presets and all - that's priceless.
post edited by Rain - 2011/07/06 01:40:56

TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
#36
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 01:59:19 (permalink)
I was in Best Buy I think...maybe Staples....can't remember. I saw Cakewalk for sale and had heard from people "it's so easy to use, it's cake!"

I bought it...version 3.0 on floppy disks. It installed, scared me to death due to all the new stuff I wasn't familiar with, and there it sat on my pc for about a year until a bud of mine who was really into the whole pc recording thing taught me a few things. Once I got the bug, I was totally hooked and have only missed Sonar 3 and 4 because at the time, I was still running Windows 98 SE and wasn't in the mood to install a new OS or buy a new pc. Heck, that one I had...I STILL have and STILL use and it has Sonar 2.2 on it to this day. LOL!

But while I was getting into the whole Cakewalk thing before Sonar came out, from the Cakewalk Newsgroups (we didn't have a forum, you had to subscribe through your email program and the entire database of conversations would download to your inbox lol) I got to be friends with quite a few guys and one of the guys that worked for Cake. He asked me to be a beta tester and sent me the coolest T-shirt (which I still have and wear) a frisbee and a hat..which of course I still have too. LOL! I stayed on for a few years but got my undies in a bunch when one of the releases we tested extensively was released loaded with bugs to the point of it being horribly unstable. I'll spare you the details on that...

Several other companies were throwing stuff out there too and I was curious to try their stuff. Pro Tools was something I was never interested in because I didn't have a MAC. One year, they release a free Windows version that gave you 8 tracks of recording. It was absolutely horrible on all counts. Their excuse was "yeah, well it was made for MAC, we're just starting to get this Windows thing together".

From there I tried Cubase 3.0 at some point but had to completely reconfigure my system to make it work and that bothered me. Cake/Sonar (though it had a few quirks like it does today) just seemed to work for me and we always had a newsgroup or forum where the dudes on there knew nearly as much as the tech support guys....who weren't as active as you see today. It was strictly peers doing most of the work and a tech guy by the name of Michael Nicholas. Between Michael, Jim Roseberry, Rip Rowan (I think?), and a few others, there was basically no issue they couldn't solve.

I started using Cool Edit which was cool, but it lacked midi options. As I learned more about pc's, I started buying any program I could get my hands on. But I always seemed to go back to Sonar even though some of the others had some really cool options. When I got tired of having people not wanting to work with me because I didn't use Pro Tools, I broke down and bought a MAC and spent over 10k on stupid PT cards etc. Then new Cubase and Nuendo came out...then I got into Paris Audio which was really a killer program that I wish someone would have bought and continued to support...then I got Logic for my MAC. Absolutely the most difficult program to use of all time...and it didn't come with a manual. You had to print 9 trillion pages of it out! Powerful and really cool, I just had problems getting it down. I did get it down eventually and use the later version today once in a while, but my heart still belongs to Sonar. Reaper came out and I was giving my all to it. Though I think it's one of the best DAWS out there and the best bang for the buck, sometimes I found it too cluttered with options and routing as well as a major dislike for the interface regardless of what skin I used. I just felt like I was using cheap software...like the earlier versions of Pro Tools....how it looked like a cross between Windows 3.1 and DOS. LOL! Ok, Reaper doesn't look that bad, but I just never took to the look of it.

Anyway, years later and just about every program ever made here in my studio, Sonar is still the one for me. It's not like I haven't tried other programs at great lengths....because I have. But there's just something about Sonar that keeps me coming back. Bugs and all (just like the others have as well) it's just my soul mate for everything "recording." :)

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#37
backwoods
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2571
  • Joined: 2011/03/23 17:24:50
  • Location: South Pacific
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 02:34:39 (permalink)
Great stuff Danny.  I remember one of your posts you said you used a cracked copy for quite a while.
#38
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 02:56:07 (permalink)
backwoods


Great stuff Danny.  I remember one of your posts you said you used a cracked copy for quite a while.

Yikes did I actually admit to that on here somewhere? I must have really been angry about something. LOL! I don't think it was a crack though. I think it was a borrow. I remember I bought a release of Cake that just didn't work for me at all. Crashes, lock ups, all kinds of stuff. As a matter of fact, that particular version of Cake was the only version I never did a complete project in. Then low and behold, a new version came out that supposedly fixed all that stuff. My bud bought it and said how great it was, but I was stull fuming about the other version I bought that just would not work on my system. I even called tech support and everything.
 
So he installed his copy on my box...so I guess you can say "paid for by someone else" or "borrowed". LOL! I've definitely used a few cracks in my time, but I don't recall Sonar being one of them. I'm not just saying that because I'm on the Sonar forum. I must have said it though if you remember it....*I* just don't remember it yet I remember all the other cracks I've tried. Most were "try that I DID buy" or uninstalled, a few others were...well you know, let's just say I spent obnoxious amounts of money on certain plugs and programs that just got worse as time went on....they made you install weird drivers and dongles...the stuff never worked right, tech support was horrendous and non-existent, and due to all this protection stuff and issues due to protection, I was the one that felt like I was being punished for buying software. I felt they stole from me, I returned the favor.

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#39
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9736
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
  • Location: Las Vegas
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 03:01:02 (permalink)
Danny Danzi

 Cake/Sonar (though it had a few quirks like it does today) just seemed to work for me and we always had a newsgroup or forum where the dudes on there knew nearly as much as the tech support guys....who weren't as active as you see today. It was strictly peers doing most of the work and a tech guy by the name of Michael Nicholas. Between Michael, Jim Roseberry, Rip Rowan (I think?), and a few others, there was basically no issue they couldn't solve. 


Man, those were the days... I still wonder what happened to all those guys and if they're still around.

Pretty much the whole ProRec team was on board, weren't they? Jim, Rip, Ted Perlman, Bruce Richardson and Ethan every now and then. Learned a lot from those guys. And Ted P. was fun to argue and discuss with. 

post edited by Rain - 2011/07/06 03:05:27

TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
#40
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 03:05:09 (permalink)
Ted P and Bruce.....hahahaha....there was one other guy.....started with an M.....darn....wait.....Morten!!!! Remember him? Were you Rain back then too? I was MAJICHANDS during those days on the newsgroup. :)

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#41
lavoll
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 447
  • Joined: 2004/10/28 13:42:50
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 04:08:16 (permalink)
because i used logic (on pc) and on 5.5 (?) some bug prevented it from working, logic tech support basically said "our program is perfect, the fault is your computer", but since cakewalk worked flawlessly on the same computer I started using that instead.. and i jumped ship just in time since 5.5. was the last version of logic on PC. 
But now the situation is the reversed. Sonar isnt working properly on my computer, along with other software that works flawlessly... but i keep coming back since Sonar is so darn nice for the way i work and compose with midi.

sonar x1b, win 7, 12gig ram, 6gb ssd, i7 Hexa Processor i7-970, lynx aurora
#42
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9736
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
  • Location: Las Vegas
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 10:07:37 (permalink)
Danny Danzi


Ted P and Bruce.....hahahaha....there was one other guy.....started with an M.....darn....wait.....Morten!!!! Remember him? Were you Rain back then too? I was MAJICHANDS during those days on the newsgroup. :)

Oh My! Now that you mention it, yes I do remember -  Morten Saether.  My nickname was Nightbird back then.

TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
#43
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9736
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
  • Location: Las Vegas
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 10:32:42 (permalink)
As to why I chose Sonar...

I knew nothing about computers back then and had no interest for them until I heard my younger brother's band demo. When he told me that they had recorded it on a PC, it was a revelation. Until then, I thought you could only program music on computers and left that stuff to my geeky synth playing buddies...

There was no such thing as a real software reseller in the small town where I lived, even ordering a computer was complex... I didn't even know you had to buy software, I thought it was something that was there by default, or freely available as a add-on. So when I finally managed to buy a PC the guy who had recorded my brother gave me a cd with all those apps on it. I tried them all and the one I could figure out the most easily was Cakewalk Pro Audio 6. Of course those were illegal, as I soon figured out. :s

Fortunately for me, my in-laws had an internet connection AND a credit card, so once I settled down on what I wanted to go with, they helped ordering me my first piece of software: Cakewalk Guitar Studio 2. 

TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
#44
kson
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 540
  • Joined: 2008/12/12 10:30:44
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 10:35:52 (permalink)
I was a Logic user until Apple acquired Emagic.  I had a copy of Cakewalk Pro Audio that I got from I don't know where and began to use it.  It was cool so I stuck with it.  And here I am with X1 Producer and still digging CW.
#45
Shambler
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 783
  • Joined: 2010/07/06 05:20:19
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 11:11:50 (permalink)
Iwas using Cubase 4 but when they updated it would no longer work with my sound card.

Before the update, if i got an audio drop out it would mean I would have to reboot the PC.

Compare that with SONAR 8.5.3, an audio dropout means I have to click on the reset audio button and I'm back in business straight away.

I was so impressed with 8.5.3 studio that I upgraded to X1 Producer to get the extra mastering tools.

Apart from the buggy initial release X1 is now very stable again, just like 8.5.3 was and I am a very happy ( and productive ) user =)

SONAR Platypus on Win10 64bit.
Studio One Pro / Cubase Pro 9.5...just in case.
8GB i7-2600 3.4GHz Gigabyte  Z68XP-UD3P
Geforce GTX970
Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 2nd Gen
Prophet 12/Rev 2/Virus Snow
Zebra2/DIVA/NI Komplete 10
#46
karma1959
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 515
  • Joined: 2008/10/31 10:56:29
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 11:27:17 (permalink)
For me, the decision came down to Cakewalk vs. ProTools.  I tend to gravitate towards industry standard technologies - figuring (out of ignorance sometimes) that if lots of people are using something (e.g. most major studios using protools for years), then its' functionality should more than meet my relatively basic needs.  Plus I tend to work 90% in audio (very little MIDI and soft synths), which I later found ProTools to be quite good for, however I chose Cakewalk for a few reasons:
 
1 - I've always been a 'PC' guy - I typically received a new one every few years for work - Cakewalk was / is the premiere platform for the PC.  ProTools was only MAC at the time and I had no desire to learn the MAC OS and hardware just for a DAW and have to purchase a new MAC every few years when I was already getting a new PC every few years - I'd use the new PC for a DAW and the older PC for personal / work purpose.     
 
2 - Open platform - Cakewalk supported standard VSTs and audio interfaces - I wasn't tied to using one particular brand of audio interface hardware.
 
3 - The forum  - this forum community is fantastic and that means the world to me.  Regardless of which platform you choose - it's frustrating if you have an issue and can't resolve it quickly.  The community on this forum is responsive and uber-helpful.
 
Hope that helps.
Russ
 
post edited by karma1959 - 2011/07/06 11:30:52
#47
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 11:55:05 (permalink)
 
An older boy made me buy it sir... honest.

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#48
DonaldDuck
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 789
  • Joined: 2007/03/14 16:46:29
  • Location: Tha South baby!
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 12:15:23 (permalink)
I started with Sonar 4 way back in the day.  I researched before I bought it, and the reviewers pretty much all praised it over other software.

I stayed with it since CW tries to keep on adding more features (although sometimes a little before they quite work).  Some have said negative things about Sonar since Cakewalk keeps releasing updates as if it's a bad thing to try to fix problems. Other DAW makers don't seem to release as many updates, and their software, despite being more expensive than Sonar, just doesn't work that well.

-Donald

The Little DAW That Could: Q6850 (OC to 3.6 GHz) | Win7 Pro 64 | 8 GB DDR2-1200 RAM | Sonar Producer 8.5.3 and X1 | Tascam DM4800 | UA 2192
#49
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9871
  • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
  • Location: Ohio
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 12:40:41 (permalink)
Why did you choose sonar, over Ableton, Logic, FL Studio, Pro Tools, Cubase

 
FWIW, I have most of the major PC DAW applications (Sonar X1, Cubase 6, ProTools 9, Vegas 10, Studio One Pro, etc).
Each has strengths and weaknesses...
No matter which you choose, the others will have a feature here/there that you wish was in your chosen DAW.
 
Sensible Copy Protection (unlock code tied to your serial number not hardware - so it doesn't change if you upgrade)
Features (Sonar is one of the more advanced/complete DAW applications)
Great low latency performance (Can sustain heavy loads at small ASIO buffer sizes)
Ease of use
64Bit Float summing (rounding error is moot)
 
In short, having used all the major DAW applications, I'm subjectively most comfortable using Sonar.
 
 

Best Regards,

Jim Roseberry
jim@studiocat.com
www.studiocat.com
#50
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 50621
  • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
  • Location: Fort Worth, TX
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 13:17:04 (permalink)
believe it or not, I chose sonar based on the forum. 

I had/have a copy of Cakewalk Express Gold which came with a soundblaster Live! PCI soundcard, but I didn't really use it, just played around with it.

when I went to buy a DAW, I bought Magix Music Maker (can't remember the version), bought a soundcard with Abelton Live Lite 4 on it, had a keyboard with cubase le on it, but settled on Sonar Home Studio 4 based on the forum and the available help.

and even if it weren't for this wonderful forum where everyone is always happy and gets along with everyone...I still like sonar's features better than those others that I've tried and thus I've upgraded each time based on what I liked using.

http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
#51
Notecrusher
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 579
  • Joined: 2004/02/17 00:32:14
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 14:14:33 (permalink)
I decided to get into computer-based production in 1999 and I'd always been a Windows guy. I got the demos of Logic, Cubase and Cakewalk and did a shootout. I expected it to come down to Logic or Cubase, I really just included PA9 to add a little more competition.

Well, Logic was unbearable. I couldn't do anything with it. Worst software interface I'd ever seen. Cubase was somewhat better. But Cakewalk actually acted like a native Windows program. It was really easy to learn and use. I've been on it ever since.

I feel bad about sleeping on Ableton when it came out, I wish I'd jumped on it and learned it w/ version 1. I've made 2 attempts to to learn it in the last few years but I'm always frustrated by the learning curve and how deep the program is now and how invested I am in all these years of Cakewalk usage, which honestly I'm not that enamored with anymore. If they made the matrix view a major major major focus of X2 I might get excited about Sonar again...
#52
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4604
  • Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 14:21:09 (permalink)
Rico Belled talked me into trying it after slamming him with tons of questions, and I never looked back!

Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard   
i7 3770k CPU
32 gigs RAM
Presonus AudioBox iTwo
Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit
Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops
Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51
Presonus Eureka
Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
#53
travismc1
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 191
  • Joined: 2010/02/01 10:50:23
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 15:00:25 (permalink)
Started with Magix Music Maker 2000 it sucked.   Could not keep it from crashing. 

Next purchase was Cakewalk Music Creator 2.  I had so much fun with that program, just never got serious with music creation.

Borrowed some versions of Sonar and found that they worked exactly like Music Creator in the flow of things.  In the meantime, maudio gave me a half brokedown copy of ableton 7 when I bought a better audio interface when I wanted to start trying to get serious.  Lexicon Alpha gave me cubase.  But I kept going back to Sonar for main production... I use Ableton to piece together ideas but I do my complete mixing in Sonar...X1....b (waiting on c)...

As long as Ableton is 32 bit only, I won't even consider the change.  I loaded my Sonar 64-bit system with 36 tracks of audio and just loaded each chanel with plugins/ some soft-synths. and Sonar NEVER even lagged behind or dropped out...  Can't do that in Ableton...!!!



Dell XPS Studio / Core I-7 920 / 8GB DDR-3/  Windows 7/ 2-1 Tb SATA hd.  SONAR X3b Producer / Axiom49 (2nd Gen)/ Profire 2626 / ProTools 11 

http://bigtstudio.com/
#54
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9871
  • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
  • Location: Ohio
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 15:02:11 (permalink)
Rip, Ted Perlman, Bruce Richardson and Ethan every now and then.

 
I miss talking with those guys... along with Lionel Dumond, Morten Saether, Pete Leoni, etc.
CompuServe based Forums!  

Best Regards,

Jim Roseberry
jim@studiocat.com
www.studiocat.com
#55
djjhart@aol.com
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2189
  • Joined: 2008/10/24 08:45:46
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 17:29:45 (permalink)
I started on a Ensoniq esq 1 in 1989, which my older bother owned , I used it without him knowing of course , Then In 1995 I bought a power Mac 7500 from Sam Ash along with a nice Shiny red Nordlead and Opcodes Studio Vision/ pro /dsp( upgraded untill 1998),I have to say Studio Vision Pro was amazing until some of the programmers/Owners decided to sell and code for a program call Pro Tools and then those whores from Gibson took over and decided to kill it . I was using that program until about 1999 and switch to Cakewalk because I was in need of a new computer and could not afford another $3000 for a mac and the hardware needed for protools , so a Delta 410  Sonar and a Compaq pc where bought for alot less, I Upgraded every year since . I even started earlier DJing in 1986, and I still dj to this day..I think I might be getting Old. I can remember using rolands smpte box and an Otari 24 track tape maschine like it was yesterday. OH have times have changed .. 

Computer - Intel Q9550, Intel BX48bt2 MB, W8 64 bit. 8 gb Ram, SSD  
Hardware - Tascam Fw1884 Control surface only, Ni S49 Komplete Kontroll,Roland Quad Capture, Ni Machine,Kore, Focusrite A/D converter, Blue Mic, Roland Gaia, Akai Mpk49, Yamaha HS80 Monitors.
Software - Sonar Platinum , Vengeance VPS bundle,Sugar Bytes Effectrix, Turnado, NI Komplete 10 Ultimate, Dune, Rob Papen  Blade , Delay, Punch Evolved.
 http://soundcloud.com/johnhartson/tracks  
 http://www.youtube.com/user/jhart1313 
 
#56
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3922
  • Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
  • Location: Victoria, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 17:39:43 (permalink)
Rain
Twigman

...the other guys swap whole projects between them....which throws up another set of difficulties as I don't think we all have the same plugs...

You are right....but the pressure is on for me to migrate to Mac/logic and all the same plugs as the others......
As long as one opts for exporting wav files, rendering synths, etc, there's no reason to switch really. You might as well stick to what you know best as long as it works for you...

And unless you collaborate with those people on an ongoing basis, swapping files back and forth all the time, the workaround is ok.
When you are collaborating, nobody cares which software you are using.  It's the end results that count.


SonarPlatinum(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)
FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
Having fun at work lately
#57
michaelhanson
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3529
  • Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
  • Location: Mesquite, Texas
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 18:35:03 (permalink)
 I started on a Boss 532 and quickly out grew 4 tracks.  I then picked up Magix Music Studio from a Best Buy, because I had a PC.  Of course, that did n't last.  I was at a NAMM show shortly there after and saw a Sonar demo and brought a demo disk home to try out.  I ended up buying Home Studio 2 XL and used that for many years.  It was n't until Sonar 8 that I took Cake up on an upgrade offer and made the jump to 8 Studio.  Shortly there after, with the purchase of a Quadcore, I made the next step to Producer and X! Producer. 

Big influenses for me were that initial demo at NAMM.  The fact that I have always been PC driven.  The Sonar forum; which I have followed for many years......even though I don't post a lot.  Oh, and another major factor for me has been the ability to upgrade through Cakewalk's promotions.  Thank you Cake for making this easy for a good old boy from Texas.

Mike

https://soundcloud.com/michaeljhanson
https://www.facebook.com/michaeljhanson.music
iTunes:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/scandalous-grace/id1180730765
 
Platinum Lifetime, Focusrite 8i6 & 2i4, Gibson LP, ES335, Fender Strat, 4003 Rickenbacker
BMI
#58
michaelhanson
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3529
  • Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
  • Location: Mesquite, Texas
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 18:37:53 (permalink)
 Oops.....Double post.
post edited by MakeShift - 2011/07/06 18:39:02

Mike

https://soundcloud.com/michaeljhanson
https://www.facebook.com/michaeljhanson.music
iTunes:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/scandalous-grace/id1180730765
 
Platinum Lifetime, Focusrite 8i6 & 2i4, Gibson LP, ES335, Fender Strat, 4003 Rickenbacker
BMI
#59
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Why did you choose sonar and what makes it better than other DAWS? 2011/07/06 19:21:18 (permalink)

I started using Cubase back at SL2 IIRC.  I never really found it very intuitive and I wanted something better for working with the dozen or so hardware synths that I had at the time.  So I tried a bunch of demos, bought a few other DAWs along the way, and...yada yada yada, I currently use Sonar X1 and PT9 about equally - Sonar for my MIDI-heavy projects and PT9 for tracking and projects that are exclusively(ish) audio.  Yes, I could pick one or the other, but I rather like using both.

I'm pretty fluent in several DAWs/hosts (e.g., Studio One Pro, Live, Project5, the ones already mentioned) and I don't think Sonar (nor PT) is necessarily better than any of the others - it just fits my way of thinking and I'm comfortable with it.  Sometimes I wish I could hand-pick the parts I like from several different DAWs and build my own.

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

#60
Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1