bandso
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 361
- Joined: 2007/04/15 23:48:13
- Location: Boston, MA
- Status: offline
Why not just parallel compress everything?
We want out mix to have maximum punch and yet maintain dynamics... so...... why not?
Every track, PLUS the entire mix, and at the mastering stage!!
Pros? Cons? Does this sound totally nuts?
Bandlab Platinum and every other toy I can get my hands on...and yes I'm way in debt over this obsession...
|
arachnaut
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1168
- Joined: 2007/05/05 17:24:33
- Location: Sunnyvale, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 12:35:40
(permalink)
Sometimes things sound good in the distance of the soundstage, especially in quiet passages.
- Jim Hurley - SONAR Platinum - x64 - Windows 10 Pro ASUS P8P67 PRO Rev 3.0; Core i7-2600K@4.4GHz; 16 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X; GeForce GT 740; Saffire Pro14 MixControl 3.7; Axiom 61 64-Bit audio, SR: 48kHz, ASIO 256 samples latency, Rec/Play I/O Buffers 512k, Total Round Trip Latency 13 ms, Pow-r 3 dither
|
jason216
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 58
- Joined: 2012/11/29 16:55:30
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 12:42:06
(permalink)
|
Lynn
Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6117
- Joined: 2003/11/12 18:36:16
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 12:54:30
(permalink)
Parallel compression is fairly common these days. It's so easy to do in Sonar, and I think many people are willing to give it a try. It's not always necessary, but it can solve a number of problems in a mix if used properly.
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 13:15:12
(permalink)
bandso
We want out mix to have maximum punch and yet maintain dynamics... so...... why not?
Every track, PLUS the entire mix, and at the mastering stage!!
Pros? Cons? Does this sound totally nuts?
Try it and you will find out. To mix a song so it has the most powerful punch and sound as humanly possible, parallel compressing every single track will not do it. There are many other factors that you need to take into account. CJ
|
ltb
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2707
- Joined: 2005/06/19 13:34:08
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 13:29:28
(permalink)
I'll use parallel on drums-2bus, mastering plus & material with quiet passages.
(along with upward compression) but not for general instrument audio processing or tracking.
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 13:56:15
(permalink)
Processing tools are there to solve specific issues. IOW, Don't use them simply because they're available.  This is a mistake that many local (live engineers) make with the new breed of digital consoles. Just because EQ and Dynamics are available on every channel/bus... doesn't mean it should always be used. What does the track (individual or mix) need? Process as required.
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 14:12:12
(permalink)
You might as well ask why we don't turn every element of the mix up to maximum volume, why we don't add distortion to everything, why we don't add reverb to the bass, why we don't give everything maximum stereo width.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
bandso
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 361
- Joined: 2007/04/15 23:48:13
- Location: Boston, MA
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 14:47:44
(permalink)
This was more of a joke post than anything. It's just funny that many of the tutorials that I've seen recently seem to put it all over the place but not all at the same time. Bass, vocals, snare, drum buss, overheads, guitars, acoustic guitars, you name it, can benefit from this. You hear catch phrases like, keep the dynamic transients-smash the room and it'll sound much better punchier, more professional, and polished.
Bandlab Platinum and every other toy I can get my hands on...and yes I'm way in debt over this obsession...
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Why not just parallel compress everything?
2014/05/20 17:18:06
(permalink)
A lot of it depends on how much compression you use. Sometimes I like smashing the drums to bring up the room sounds, but then it makes the drums sound awful. Bringing in the dry signal can restore balance to the Force while having lots of room sound.
OTOH for vocals I compress by voice a lot, but don't add in dry signal. Ditto bass, unless I really need the pick transients for definition. In that case, setting a longer attack time on the compressor is often a better option, because I only want more initial transient, not more dry bass.
|