do you really need more then one hardware fader?

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
kc2ine
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 396
  • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
  • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
  • Status: offline
2011/09/06 15:17:53 (permalink)

do you really need more then one hardware fader?

what are the situations when you really need to operates more then 1 at a time?
So far I'm doing fine with my 1 motorized fader on VS100 and thinking  why to duplicate
those 8 (or more) on my screen monitor...
isn't it like hypocrisy?  We once have switched to computers from hardware and now we're switching back to hardware again...fader after fader, knob after knob until we'll back to standalone hardware recorder 


post edited by kc2ine - 2011/09/06 15:46:48

V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
#1

83 Replies Related Threads

    Lanceindastudio
    Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4604
    • Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:24:29 (permalink)
    Mainly if you want to ride more than one parameter at the same time I would say-

    Then again, you can assign a knob to the other parameter-

    Ultimately, one fader is fine to gitter done.

    Other than that, if you like to mix old school moving multiple faders at the same time.


    Lance


    Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard   
    i7 3770k CPU
    32 gigs RAM
    Presonus AudioBox iTwo
    Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit
    Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops
    Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51
    Presonus Eureka
    Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
    #2
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:25:06 (permalink)
    Well I think more is better.

    I was an early adopter of a CS under Pro Audio with the CW StudioMix. So I don't know what you mean by going back to hardware. I have had a CS for most of the time I have been using a DAW. I switch to a Logic Control when I was using Logic then I was able to replace it with a Mackie Control and haven't looked back since.

    Ones reason was right of the bat I realized that using a CS would speed up working with a DAW.

    Having 8 or more faders lets one move those faders at the same time if needed and that is often needed. If you look at a multi fader CS such as the MC you will notice that the faders are concave to let a pencil drop into them. A technique used by studios.
    post edited by John - 2011/09/06 15:28:48

    Best
    John
    #3
    brundlefly
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 14250
    • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
    • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:27:48 (permalink)
    We once have switched to computers from hardware and now we're switching back to hardware again...fader after fader, know after knob until we'll back to standalone hardware recorder 



    Yes, it sometimes seems ironic, but you're mostly only buying knobs and switches now, not expensive DSP and synth circuitry and firmware that is difficult or impossible to upgrade as technology improves.


    Multiple faders allow you to mix multiple tracks without having to do any button pushing to change track focus.





    SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
    Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
    #4
    garrigus
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8599
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
    • Location: www.garrigus.com
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:28:56 (permalink)
    Absolutely needed? Maybe not.

    But nice to have... most definitely.

    Being able to adjust multiple parameters at the same time is nice, especially if they relate to one another, such as fading in one track while fading out another. You can do that in a couple passes, but it's nicer to do it at the same time.

    Scott

    --
    Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
    * Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
    * Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

    #5
    kc2ine
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
    • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:36:06 (permalink)
    John


     Having 8 or more faders lets one move those faders at the same time if needed and that is often needed.



    but why? you cannot move precisely and accurately  more then one unless you're chameleon...


    V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
    #6
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:38:09 (permalink)
    One more thing I like about a full sized CS is they often come with a jog wheel a very nice thing to have.

    A general purpose CS like the Mackie Control will be of use with just about all DAWs and Video editing apps. Vegas Pro supports the MC nicely.

    Best
    John
    #7
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:48:48 (permalink)
    One fader is enough.  Is it better to have more if you have the money and the space, but it is a leftover convention from the analog days.  With automation write via the mouse for precise control and one fader to write bigger changes, more faders just speed things up a wee bit doing the entire mix.  And looks cool, too, with all those faders snapping around.  But I do most of my work one track at a time once the general levels are set for all tracks.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #8
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 15:56:54 (permalink)
    AT


    One fader is enough.  Is it better to have more if you have the money and the space, but it is a leftover convention from the analog days.  With automation write via the mouse for precise control and one fader to write bigger changes, more faders just speed things up a wee bit doing the entire mix.  And looks cool, too, with all those faders snapping around.  But I do most of my work one track at a time once the general levels are set for all tracks.

    @


    LOL Yes one track at a time is all that can be done with a single fader.  It is not a throw back to the analog days at all. Show me a digital mixer or console that doesn't have more then one fader? Some things simply are how they are done even if its been done a long time.

    Best
    John
    #9
    FastBikerBoy
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 11326
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
    • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 16:17:42 (permalink)
    You don't need more than one fader but it sure is nice and convenient to have.

    It's one of those things that when you haven't got them you wonder why you on earth you'd need them, then when you've got them you wonder how on earth you managed without them.
    #10
    kc2ine
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
    • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 16:27:50 (permalink)
    FastBikerBoy


    You don't need more than one fader but it sure is nice and convenient to have.

    It's one of those things that when you haven't got them you wonder why you on earth you'd need them, then when you've got them you wonder how on earth you managed without them.
    hey, almost like with the woman... 


    V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
    #11
    Kalle Rantaaho
    Max Output Level: -5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7005
    • Joined: 2006/01/09 13:07:59
    • Location: Finland
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 17:06:21 (permalink)
    kc2ine


    John


    Having 8 or more faders lets one move those faders at the same time if needed and that is often needed.



    but why? you cannot move precisely and accurately  more then one unless you're chameleon...


    You don't need to move them all simultaneously. You can handle 2-4 sliders at the same time. You raise the guitar when the guitar solo starts, boost the backing vocals during chorus etc. It's not the only way to do it, but simply, many want to do it that way. It can't be an issue, can it?


    SONAR PE 8.5.3, Asus P5B, 2,4 Ghz Dual Core, 4 Gb RAM, GF 7300, EMU 1820, Bluetube Pre  -  Kontakt4, Ozone, Addictive Drums, PSP Mixpack2, Melda Creative Pack, Melodyne Plugin etc.
    The benefit of being a middle aged amateur is the low number of years of frustration ahead of you.
    #12
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 17:20:39 (permalink)
    kc2ine


    John


    Having 8 or more faders lets one move those faders at the same time if needed and that is often needed.



    but why? you cannot move precisely and accurately  more then one unless you're chameleon...


    Not true you can move multiple faders with precision. At least on a Mackie Control you can. You also have two hands.  Not something a single fader can use. Ask yourself this can a pianist use more then one key with precision?

    Also the Mackie Control has the best precision of any CS on the market. Each fader uses 14 bit MIDI for fader movement. Not the 7 bits in most other CSs.
    post edited by John - 2011/09/06 17:23:46

    Best
    John
    #13
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 17:44:45 (permalink)
    John, I said I work on a track at a time once the overall levels have been set.  For that, a single fader works.  As for precision - your left pinkie is as accurate as your right index?  And can do .1 dB increments?  Just to be sure.

    And of course more is better - what isn't except my girth?  We were talking about controllers and I said moving multiple faders was necessary during the analog days and you turn it into a digital/analog mixer how many faders do we have.  Playing a board is an analog convention.  Guess what?  It works for digital, too.  Even non-moving ones.  it is one way to work.  And fun and organic.  But I doubt anyone today uses it as a way to control silibence.  If you do, more power to you.  I use a mouse. 
    The op asked if one fader can work.  it can.  maybe you can't make it work.  Or maybe you just prefer to work w/ more faders.  That ain't the same thing.

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #14
    kc2ine
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
    • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 18:17:13 (permalink)
    well, i see John is a chameleon then...as far as I know humans cannot focus their eyes at more then one point at a time.
    There is of course peripheral vison but this is blare and doesn't provide accuracy. 
    So as I see it multi-fadering allows you only ballpark adjustment and then you still have to adjust each and every fader separately. Not really big gain, but other argument that it looks cool convince me better. Imagine shocking effect of a sexy groupie walking into your studio with all those flying fadres and sh$t 


    p.s.
    Great, it saves me few hundreds dollars.
    post edited by kc2ine - 2011/09/06 18:18:16

    V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
    #15
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 18:28:50 (permalink)
    kc2ine


    well, i see John is a chameleon then...as far as I know humans cannot focus their eyes at more then one point at a time.
    There is of course peripheral vison but this is blare and doesn't provide accuracy. 
    So as I see it multi-fadering allows you only ballpark adjustment and then you still have to adjust each and every fader separately. Not really big gain, but other argument that it looks cool convince me better. Imagine shocking effect of a sexy groupie walking into your studio with all those flying fadres and sh$t 


    p.s.
    Great, it saves me few hundreds dollars.


    You do know that a Mackie Control has a track strip for showing the tracks in use. No different from looking at the CV. Plus on an MC you have levels showing.

    If you have never tried an MC I really don't see how you can comment about it in any way. You really don't know what you are talking about.  You may think you are being clever but it comes off as ignorance.

    Best
    John
    #16
    kc2ine
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
    • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 18:38:20 (permalink)
    John

         You really don't know what you are talking about.  You may think you are being clever but it comes off as ignorance. 


    John, haven't you recently received that message? I believe you have....




    V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
    #17
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 18:43:02 (permalink)
    kc2ine


    John

         You really don't know what you are talking about.  You may think you are being clever but it comes off as ignorance. 


    John, haven't you recently received that message? I believe you have....




    It would appear you received it. I never have.

    Best
    John
    #18
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 18:46:02 (permalink)
    kc2ine this thread is about whether 1 physical fader is enough. I was trying to answer the OP (you) from my own experience. Just what are you trying to do?
    post edited by John - 2011/09/06 18:47:27

    Best
    John
    #19
    aleef
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 431
    • Joined: 2006/09/14 20:02:26
    • Location: la/ca
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:16:39 (permalink)
    Well I think more is better

     
    yeah me too..

    Intel i7 3820 3.6 GHz
    ASUS Sabertooth X79 16Gb   
    SonarX2PE ProTools 11 
    RME HDSP9632
    #20
    kc2ine
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
    • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:24:36 (permalink)
    aleef



    Well I think more is better

     
    yeah me too..

    not anymore...





    V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
    #21
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:28:07 (permalink)
    Kc: are you done yet >??
    #22
    kc2ine
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
    • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:37:55 (permalink)
    John


    kc2ine this thread is about whether 1 physical fader is enough. I was trying to answer the OP (you) from my own experience. 


    well, as usually you din't convinced me. Not a one logical argument about real need for more then one fader.
    I can understand this though who spent around 1k$ on something he'll be trying to justify that purchase somehow and that's ok.
       
    post edited by kc2ine - 2011/09/06 20:45:06

    V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
    #23
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:41:00 (permalink)
    Kc: maby i should post a pic of me at the A&M big recording desk
    #24
    ampfixer
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5508
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
    • Location: Ontario
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:52:05 (permalink)
    StarTekh


    Kc: maby i should post a pic of me at the A&M big recording desk


    Sounds good. I'd be very impressed to see a real professional console.

    Regards, John 
     I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
    WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
    #25
    kc2ine
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2011/08/05 15:45:07
    • Location: Fort Laduerdale, FL
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:52:07 (permalink)
    StarTekh


    Kc: maby i should post a pic of me at the A&M big recording desk

    well. I don't want to see more tomatoes 




    V-Studio 100, Sony VAIO i7 2.93GHz/ 8GB RAM, Pianoteq, Sonar X1 Studio, ezDrummer, Macbook Pro, Roland RD700GX stage piano, Yamaha Motif XS6 workstation, Rode NT-1A, AKG Perception 220 
    #26
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 20:52:37 (permalink)
    kc2ine


    John


    kc2ine this thread is about whether 1 physical fader is enough. I was trying to answer the OP (you) from my own experience. 


    well, as usually you din't convinced me. Not a one logical argument about real need for more then one fader.
    I can understand this though who spent around 1k$ on something he'll be trying to justify that purchase somehow and that's ok.
      


    Look don't be convinced. You are the one that wont know how well they work. What I wonder is why bother asking if you already had your answer? It means nothing to me what you decide but it may mean something to others that have an open mind and can imagine the benefit. 

    Best
    John
    #27
    BenMMusTech
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2606
    • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
    • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 21:03:26 (permalink)
    Kc2ine, ok here is my take, Yes one fader is more than enough.  Have you seen engineers behind their mixing desk.  Remind you of the old adage of compensating.

    We have moved on from massive desks that actually take two or three people to operate, if we need to make multiple fader/whatever movements we just go back and do one at a time (somewhat more accurate, I would believe and then of course even more acurate is to draw them in)  Because we mix as we go (I am a modern digital musician) the whole notion of needing to do multilple fader movements, well lets just say I don't do it very offten.

    The other thing we have is grouping, I am doing that at the moment with one of my sends.

    (Slightly OT) Does that mean we don't need mixing desks/hardware faders anymore, NO!!! there are many occasions when we still need these devices but it is fast becoming obsolete.

    I am at the moment using a tablet controller, the app cost me 5$, the tablet cost me $700, the great thing is I can mix a song and answer emails at the same time.

    As The Digital Musician starts to become more prevelent, we will see more of a shift away from tradtional models, things like mixing desks and studios.
     
    I will have a lot of "engineers" up in arms over that last statement but a new musican is emerging, The Digital Musician, for which I am.  This new breed of musican, does not need an engineer or a producer or studio or a ****ing great edifice to make up for a small manhood.

    As Robert Fripp said and I apply this to me "I am a small, mobile, independent and intelligent unit"

    Peace Ben

    Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
    http://1331.space/
    https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
    http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
    #28
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 21:08:26 (permalink)
    ampfixer: Il have the wife airbrush my face a little but sure !!
    #29
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:do you really need more then one hardware fader? 2011/09/06 21:20:45 (permalink)
    Now how many fader do you realy need KC ?
    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1