Underwear Scene from new Star Trek Movie

2013/05/23 12:11:14

Starise

* sigh * you mean we will still need underwear in the future?

2013/05/23 12:11:53

craigb

Beagle

musicman100

are yuo guys saying there is no more sex in the 23th century

Haven't you seen Demolition Man?

not only that, but all restaurants are now Taco Bell. duh.

I used to walk by that location used in the movie since it was right by where I lived in Irvine California (the building is actually their headquarters which features a Taco Bell restaurant on the ground floor).

2013/05/23 12:44:00

Beagle

craigb

Beagle

it's not really all that much to get excited about. I've seen less clothing and more provocative scenes on primetime TV. Most beachwear is more revealing than what she was wearing.

should it have been in the scene? I don't know, I haven't seen the movie yet (I have tickets for tomorrow), but if it is truly a scene just to show a "scantily clad actor" in order to increase ratings, then I'd say it should NOT be there. at least give some credibility to the REASON she's in her underwear.

Really? Go back and watch the original three Star Treks (so-called episodes 4 thru 6). Now take notice of Pricess Leah's attire as it gets less and less with each new movie... Heh.

I'll assume you mean Star Wars, but I don't get your point? yeah, her attire gets less and less - but at least they had good reasons for her attire - that's all I'm sayin. if you want to show skin - at least make it a good reason. [shrugs]

2013/05/23 12:52:14

craigb

Wow... You can no longer go back and modify your posts??? When did that happen??!

Yes, you're right. I meant Star Wars not Star Trek.

2013/05/23 13:15:50

Ham N Egz

craigb

Wow... You can no longer go back and modify your posts??? When did that happen??!

Yes, you're right. I meant Star Wars not Star Trek.

http://forum.cakewalk.com/fb.ashx?m=2833550

http://forum.cakewalk.com/fb.ashx?m=2833550 YES YOU CAN

2013/05/23 13:31:32

Linear Phase

There is nobody in the new start trek movie, that I would like to see in their underwear...

BTW, I did click the link, after I typed that sentence out, and confirmed my thoughts.

YUCK

2013/05/23 14:43:49

Mesh

2013/05/23 14:46:13

Ham N Egz

2013/05/23 14:52:09

batsbrew

best scene in the movie

2013/05/23 15:03:11

SteveStrummerUK

Over here, it's rated as a '12A' by the British Board of Film Classification.

As such, the guidelines are:

Discrimination

Discriminatory language or behaviour is unlikely to

be acceptable unless clearly disapproved of or in an

educational or historical context. Discrimination by

a character with which children can readily identify

is unlikely to be acceptable.

Drugs

References to illegal drugs or drug misuse must be

innocuous or carry a suitable anti-drug message.

Horror

Frightening sequences should not be prolonged or

intense. Fantasy settings may be a mitigating factor.

Imitable behaviour

No detail of potentially dangerous behaviour which

young children are likely to copy. No glamorisation

of realistic or easily accessible weapons.

Language

Mild bad language only.

Nudity

Natural nudity, with no sexual context.

Sex

Sexual activity may be implied, but should be

discreet and infrequent. Mild sex references and

innuendo only.

Theme

Where more serious issues are featured (for example,

domestic violence) nothing in their treatment should

condone unacceptable behaviour.

Violence

Moderate violence, without detail, may be allowed,

if justified by its context (for example, history,

comedy or fantasy).

Underwear Scene from new Star Trek Movie

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account