scook
As a result I am schooled in "Business 101" and told that I "understand the distinction" even though it is irrelevant. This to me means any distinction would not matter in this case, which is what I said.
Which is correct. The Business 101 reference wasn't directed to you, but at the nature of the original comment which as far as I could tell was
not about the survey, but the belief that Gibson has to keep Cakewalk money flowing in to satisfy shareholders based on the "business 101" concept that public companies have to cater to their shareholders. Then again, at this point I'm not sure if your comment about "I don't understand the distinction between public and private companies in this case. It would appear that you don't either." was directed at me or the original post #55.
In any event...if anyone here
didn't know about the differences between private and public companies, they now have a bit of trivia that's sure to liven up the conversation at
any party