Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 - WORKS

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
don4777
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 264
  • Joined: 2004/06/06 17:21:38
  • Status: offline
2008/10/06 16:25:54 (permalink)

Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 - WORKS

UPDATE TO AVOID CONFUSION: (For those that don't like to read entire threads)

Bottom Line: IT WORKS!!! No new software is needed. Several have confirmed this - using Windows XP (SP2 or SP3) or Vista (32 bit) - but you MAY need to reinstall the FW-1884 software (dirver/plugin).

I am using XP SP2, TASCAM driver 1.60, and Sonar Plugin 1.22 Beta that I used with Sonar 7. Others are using other versions successfully. The key for those (like myself) that had problems with their FW-1884 after upgrading to Sonar 8 appears to be uninstalling and reinstalling the Sonar Plugin (possibly the TASCAM driver also).

Some are still experiencing a latency issue BUT it is not limited to the FW-1884. Cakewalk is working on it and there is no reason to believe that it won't be identified and fixed soon for control surfaces that are experiencing the issue.

----------------------- Original Post (uneditted) Follows ---------------------------
Oh no. I'm hoping it's just me and that reinstalling the FW-1884 drivers will make it all better.

I installed Sonar 8PE as soon as it arrived this afternoon. Installation went well. I open up a project from Sonar 7 and everything seemed to work as expected/hoped. I like the new pause feature and the change to not stop/start the audio engine fixed a small problem (as expected) with the Lynx AES16e.

I found I could drop latencies a little further than with 7PE and get excellent playback with lots of tracks and plugins. Good job Bakers!!!

I then tried using my FW-1884. I only use it as a control surface - no I/O. I have the latest drivers - which took forever to get (from Frontier/Tascam) to fix problems working with Sonar 7. I found a couple of fairly serious problems in just a few minutes. I suspect that these are once again probably Tascam driver issues. And wouldn't expect Tascam to be any more responsive this time around if they are. Frontier tried to be helpful on the last driver update but their efforts were hampered tremendously by Tascam.

Problems noted:

- The faders do not move to the current position when a session is opened or even when a track is selected. As soon as you move the virtual slider the FW-1884 slider jumps to the correct position. If you move the 1884 fader the virtual slider will move to the proper location. Nothing changed in my configuration that I can tell from Sonar 7. And read automation was on. I suspect the configuration is correct since the 1884 fader does jump to the proper location as soon as the virtual fader is moved.

- The jog wheel is pretty much unusable. It will move the Now Time marker but the sensitivity is erratic and there appears to be some cueing of commands. There is some latency in starting and then there continues to be some movement after stopping the jog wheel. The shift button did nothing to improve the problem.

I only spent a few minutes and then went to drink heavily to deal with the prospects of waiting for a Tascam driver update. Actually I decided to search the forum to see if anyone else had run into any problems with this or better yet fond that it worked great. Since it is very early and not a lot of people have Sonar 8 installed yet (and even fewer FW-1884 users with Sonar 8 installed). I will keep watching the forum - and playing with the FW-1884 to see if I can persuade it to cooperate.

Don
post edited by don4777 - 2008/10/09 13:21:20
#1

35 Replies Related Threads

    dcasey
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 141
    • Joined: 2003/12/30 21:32:18
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/06 16:59:15 (permalink)
    Many of us were afraid of this - there are a couple threads on the subject. It appears that you are the first to actually try Sonar 8 with the FW-1884, my copy is set to arrive tomorrow - I'm not inclined to open the box if you can't get it to work.

    Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk] said that no testing was done with the FW-1884. This was quite an oversight in my estimation, given the pain we all went through when ACT was introduced. I know they can't test with everything in-house, but given the earlier problems I would have thought that at least one FW-1884 user would have been included in the beta. I tried to sign up to be a beta tester, but never got a response from Cakewalk.

    Before someone chimes in and tells me I need to spend $4000 on the V-Studio 700, I'd like to point out that not all of us have an extra $4k or so laying around...

    DAW: i7920, 9GB, Win7 x64 / Presonus Firestudio Project (2), Firestudio Tube, Monitor Station, Faderport, Sceptre S8's/ Frontier Design Tranzport / M-Audio Midisport 4x4 / Roland GR-55, GI-20, VG-8 / Novation 25 SL MKII / Alesis 720 DSP / Sonar X3 PE / Vienna Ensemble Pro / Voxengo / iZotope / NI / IK / eieio

    VSTi Server 1: AMD FX-8350, 16GB, Win7 x64 / Komplete / Vienna Ensemble Pro

    VSTi Server 2: AMD A6-3670K, 16GB, Win 7 x64 / Echo Gina24 / Vienna Ensemble Pro 


    www.soundcloud.com/dannycasey 
    #2
    don4777
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 264
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 17:21:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 15:40:41 (permalink)
    There is a glimmer of hope. Just on the off chance that the programmers went back to the "old" way (pre-S7) of interfacing with the FW-1884 I loaded up the old 1.50 version of the TASCAM driver. The faders sprang to life. I haven't had a chance to test many of the other features but the jog wheel is still unusable. It continues to have the latency issue that others are also reporting with other Control Surfaces. I haven't played with the INI file prameters to see if they make a difference or not. I'll try that as soon as I have some time.

    It's a little frustrating having to change TASCAM drivers going between S7 and S8 but that won't be an issue once we are only using S8 - or have abandon the FW-1884. It looks like the writing is on the wall for the FW-1884 and Sonar if Cakewalk isn't even doing a cursory check of compatibility with new versions. (as indicated by Danny's comment above). Having Cakewalk/Roland enter the integrated HW/SW product area is probably a mixed blessing/curse. They are certainly going to concentrate on making their HW the best supported. I get the feeling the FW-1884's days are numbered. Hopefully they will offer more options. I don't want to be forced to use (or pay for) lesser quality converters and pre-amps that I don't want or need. I would probably spring for the V Studio Console as soon as it was available if it were available separately.

    Don
    #3
    einstein36
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 511
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 21:38:31
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 15:48:20 (permalink)
    there's nothing wrong with the FW-1884....it seems to be the way between S7 and S8 and reads the actual FW-1884 plugin for sonar...
    I had the same issue myself last night and just went to control panel, add/remove programs and removed the actual Sonar tascam plugin..and then re-installed...everything worked like a champ after that..
    post edited by einstein36 - 2008/10/07 15:51:16
    #4
    don4777
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 264
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 17:21:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 16:00:15 (permalink)
    Thanks e36! Are you using driver 1.50 or 1.60 for the FW-1884? No problems with the jog wheel?

    I'll try it later tonight. I didn't try removing the Sonar plugin. Just the TASCAM driver.

    It still worries me a little that Cakewalk says they didn't do any testing with the FW-1884. And when there are any problems Tascam is not the least bit responsive. Or least hasn't been in the past with respect to the FW-1884. I like the unit but it just doesn't seem to have a strong enough following to create strong interest from companies such as Cakewalk. I don't blame Cakewalk. They need to put their efforts where their customer base is.

    Thanks again.

    Don
    post edited by don4777 - 2008/10/07 16:03:56
    #5
    bermuda
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
    • Location: Bermuda
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 17:04:40 (permalink)
    Although a lot of Cubase users have an FW 1884.... if Cakewalk wants to entice them to switch.....


    ps yep I have an FW 1884 too... haven't got it dirty with 8 yet...but thanks for the posts.


    I seem to remember the faders moving on the unit when I opened a project briefly...

    I'l recheck my position tonight later.

     Yes.
    #6
    einstein36
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 511
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 21:38:31
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 17:38:41 (permalink)
    I have the 1.60 driver installed since I am using Vista 32 bit...
    I haven't had any issues with that driver per say...just the sonar plugin was the first time I have come across the interface not working but after un-installing and re-installing, everything is working like a champ now..

    P.S. Also I upgraded the firmware on mine, so that might help too......
    post edited by einstein36 - 2008/10/07 17:42:07
    #7
    D K
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1237
    • Joined: 2005/06/07 14:07:05
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 18:06:07 (permalink)
    It looks like the writing is on the wall for the FW-1884 and Sonar if Cakewalk isn't even doing a cursory check of compatibility with new versions. (as indicated by Danny's comment above


    Agreed - I kind of knew this was coming when the 1.22 Beta was never officially released and was never posted on the Tascam site. I spoke with a Tascam rep who was down here visiting the GC pro guys late last year and his (let's say.. Terse) remarks left me believing that the relationship with Cakewalk had "soured" to say the least in regards to the FW1884 anyway.

    It's a good machine and has served me well but I know I will have to move on. Stated before that I don't think Cakewalk is totaly blameless in this deteriorated situation but in the end I trust them more and they have a far better track record with servicing their customer base.

    It's just a hard and expensive machine to replace - 8 in 8 out with inserts on every input - (do not underestimate that feature- means no need for a patch bay) adat in/out spif in/out 4 midi in/out - decent control surface - expanadable - though hard to find FE8s these days.

    Will just have to go peice by peice to regain all that functionality - will take me a while but I am fine for now - Looks like all is good with S8 (I thought it would be) so we FW1884 users should be fine for now.....

    It's a shame though - It's been a good unit.........


    www.ateliersound.com
     
    ADK Custom  I7-2600 K
    Win 7 64bit /8 Gig Ram/WD-Seagate Drives(x3)
    Sonar 8.5.3 (32bit)/Sonar X3b(64bit)/Pro Tools 9
    Lavry Blue/Black Lion Audio Mod Tango 24/RME Hammerfall Multiface II/UAD Duo
     
     
     
    #8
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 18:17:42 (permalink)
    Sonar tascam plugin..


    Just cusious, the 1.21 released or 1.22 beta verison?
    #9
    dcasey
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 141
    • Joined: 2003/12/30 21:32:18
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 18:49:23 (permalink)
    For what it’s worth, I just got my copy of Sonar 8 from Sweetwater today, and I was told not to open the package. My Sweetwater rep contacted Cakewalk and was told the following:

    “We're going to have a trial version of SONAR 8 available around mid to late October. If he waits until then he can test it out and not have to open the copy he paid for making it very simple to return.

    His functionality in SONAR 8 should work much like it does in version 7. Matt has already warned you that I would say this but the problem is with the Tascam/Frontier drivers. We tried to work with them but Tascam has said that they have no intention of releasing any more updates.”

    OK, so I'll let the package sit there for a couple weeks, until I can get my hands on the trial version. I’ve been a loyal Cakewalk customer for over 12 years; I’ve upgraded every version of Sonar since the original, but if it comes down to the decision to dump my perfectly good control surface or part ways with Cakewalk – that isn't an easy decision for me.

    DAW: i7920, 9GB, Win7 x64 / Presonus Firestudio Project (2), Firestudio Tube, Monitor Station, Faderport, Sceptre S8's/ Frontier Design Tranzport / M-Audio Midisport 4x4 / Roland GR-55, GI-20, VG-8 / Novation 25 SL MKII / Alesis 720 DSP / Sonar X3 PE / Vienna Ensemble Pro / Voxengo / iZotope / NI / IK / eieio

    VSTi Server 1: AMD FX-8350, 16GB, Win7 x64 / Komplete / Vienna Ensemble Pro

    VSTi Server 2: AMD A6-3670K, 16GB, Win 7 x64 / Echo Gina24 / Vienna Ensemble Pro 


    www.soundcloud.com/dannycasey 
    #10
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 18:55:59 (permalink)
    His functionality in SONAR 8 should work much like it does in version 7.


    This is all I'm hoping for. I've already opened my SONAR 8 and I'm not concerned about that aspect.

    I for one <realised> that after the Beta driver was leaked but never <posted> online by Tascam that it was a dead deal. No surprise here. Well, the surprise was it took so long for someone to finally say it in print or out loud.

    I'll try reloading my 1.22 Beta <driver> after I install SONAR 8 if I see any problems (I expect I will, like others here).

    post edited by bapu - 2008/10/07 19:00:14
    #11
    dcasey
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 141
    • Joined: 2003/12/30 21:32:18
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 22:25:36 (permalink)
    einstein36 - I’d like some clarification if you don’t mind. Are you saying that your FW-1884 is working fine as a control surface (motorized faders, jog wheel and all) in Sonar 8, without a Sonar specific (1.21 or 1.22 “beta”) control surface driver? You said that everything is working “like a champ” after uninstalling and re-installing – please clarify what you uninstalled and re-installed. Also, is your Tascam operating in FW-1884 Native mode or in one of the emulation modes? Further, I assume you are using the v183 firmware (latest) from the Tascam site.

    I apologize to all for my veil threat to abandon Cakewalk/Sonar after all these years. I’ve relegated the FW-1884 to control surface/digital patch bay only, but I’m not ready just yet to put it on eBay. Like others, I’m hopeful that Cakewalk/Roland will offer a control surface only version of the V Studio 700 (just the console), but until then I need the FW to live – with Sonar 8 of course.

    I don't know if I can sit here another day with an unopened box with Sonar 8 in it.

    The horror, the horror...

    DAW: i7920, 9GB, Win7 x64 / Presonus Firestudio Project (2), Firestudio Tube, Monitor Station, Faderport, Sceptre S8's/ Frontier Design Tranzport / M-Audio Midisport 4x4 / Roland GR-55, GI-20, VG-8 / Novation 25 SL MKII / Alesis 720 DSP / Sonar X3 PE / Vienna Ensemble Pro / Voxengo / iZotope / NI / IK / eieio

    VSTi Server 1: AMD FX-8350, 16GB, Win7 x64 / Komplete / Vienna Ensemble Pro

    VSTi Server 2: AMD A6-3670K, 16GB, Win 7 x64 / Echo Gina24 / Vienna Ensemble Pro 


    www.soundcloud.com/dannycasey 
    #12
    bermuda
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
    • Location: Bermuda
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 22:31:07 (permalink)
    FW 1884 is working for me in sonar 8 with XP SP2

    Faders, play etc... Haven't tried much else yet.

    I had to go into the Control surface option and make sure FW 1884 control was set for in and out (damn USB keyboard was up to it's tricks at first)

    I'm defragging at the moment.

    I think I'm on 1.5 drivers WDM ...I'll have to check that and the Control surface version i'm using.

    i'm tempted to try out the ASIO drivers being that Cakewalk appear to have improved their ASIO driver interaction...looking at the fine print.
    post edited by bermuda - 2008/10/07 22:34:25

     Yes.
    #13
    don4777
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 264
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 17:21:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/07 22:36:25 (permalink)
    I reloaded TASCAM FW-1884 driver version 1.60 and Sonar FW-1884 Plugin version 1.22. It appears that most of the Control Surface functions are working but there is a latency that wasn't there with Sonar 7. This is particularly noticeable when using the jog wheel but is also present with other controls like PLAY and STOP. Others are reporting the same so I won't bother in this thread.

    So I can add my confirmation to those already above. FW-1884, with ASIO on a Q6600 (Intel Quad Core) running XP SP2 with 4GB is working fine - except for the latency also experienced on other control surfaces.

    Thanks to those that appended saying that their FW-1884 was working. I didn't want to spend a lot of time removing/reloading drivers if everyone was having the same problem.

    Don
    #14
    DonaldDuck
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 789
    • Joined: 2007/03/14 16:46:29
    • Location: Tha South baby!
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 00:51:44 (permalink)
    I ditched my FW1884 for version 7 as itnever quite worked right. It had some seemingly minor but very annoying quirks that I couldn't tolerate. If you want a REALLY nice unit with basically the same functionality (more actually) as the FW1884, get the Tascam DM3200 with the optional firewire card. You can have a control surface, analog interface, mixer, midi inputs, digital interface, and much more. You can do 32 tracks in(16 Analog, but you can connect an external AD converter to the 3200 to get more analog ins) and out of sonar as well as control it. It's about 3,000 plus the cost of the firewire card. It works off Mackie Emuluation, so as long as Sonar supports Mackie controls, the 3200 should work. It doesn't have the quarks of the 1884 that drove me insane.

    With that being said, I haven't test the 3200 with Sonar 8 as I'm poor now, but if Mackie Control Pro's work, so should the 3200/4800.

    (The 3200 has had problems working in Vista, though due to Tascam's Asleep at the Wheel Technical staff. I use XP with no problems).
    #15
    riojazz
    Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1337
    • Joined: 2004/02/26 13:23:02
    • Location: Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 14:50:09 (permalink)
    Just to confirm what dcasey posted. Apparently we have the same Sweetwater rep. I intend to wait for and test the demo version with the FW-1884, before opening my version 8 upgrade package.

    History: I was able to get the FW-1884 to work well in SONAR 7PE with XP SP3 using driver 1.50 and beta 1.22. I had to uninstall (lengthy process) the 1.60 driver. Then I moved to Vista. Under Vista Home Premium, things seem to be working well with 1.60 and 1.21 using version 7PE.

    post edited by riojazz - 2008/10/08 14:52:51

    Software: Cakewalk by Bandlab; Adobe Audition; Band-in-A-Box audiophile; Izotope Ozone; Encore; Melodyne; Win 10 Pro, 64-bit.

    Hardware: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 2nd; Roland Integra-7; TCE Finalizer; Presonus Central Station, Behringer X-Touch.  Home built i7 with 16 GB RAM, SSDs.
    #16
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 16:56:16 (permalink)
    don47777,

    after your reinstall of 1.22 beta driver did everything still work as beforre in 7PE?

    What exact steps did you take to uninstall/reinstall the SONAR plugin 1.22?

    Did you have to reinstall the Tascam driver? Are you using 1.50 or 1.60?
    #17
    don4777
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 264
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 17:21:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 17:54:40 (permalink)
    I used uninstall from the Control Panel (Add/Remove Programs) for both programs. Then I removed any directories that were left behind (e.g. C:\Program Files\FW1884) and then did a search of the disk and removed the backup driver files from the \Windows\System32 and wherever else they were found. I then used regedit to rid the registry of anything that was related to the TASCAM device. All of this with the FW-1884 disconnected. I don't like to leave things for Windows to use to sabotage my efforts.

    I'm using TASCAM driver version 1.60. I can go back and forth between S7 and S8 and both work.

    Don
    #18
    hockeyjx
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 839
    • Joined: 2003/12/09 18:36:28
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 17:58:59 (permalink)
    Yea, I am going to wait as well. For a lot of us, this was the perfect home recording solution and it's a DAMN SHAME that there is no support for this unit. Because I really don't see anything near as good on the market for me (all the inputs, surround sound capabilities, MIDI, guitar direct in, etc), for near the price I paid for the unit originally.

    At this point, I don't give a flip where the "BLAME" lies as far as this not being supported; but if the upgrade to S8 doesn't support the unit - I'm done with Sonar going forward (at least until a new similar unit hits the market). PERIOD. I'll just make due with S7.

    BAD BAKERS! BAD!

    #19
    einstein36
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 511
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 21:38:31
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 19:51:40 (permalink)
    Sorry about the confusion there,
    okay.....I just un-installed the 'official' sonar plugin from tascam's website that can be downloaded from windows and re-installed it and then after doing that...my interface started working properly...
    before I did the un-install, damn, I couldn't get nothing to work, no faders, no nothing...and since I am a computer tech support and realized that it wasn't the actual FW drivers themselves since windows was obviously still able to see the interface, but just nothing working within sonar itself and realized that between sonar 6 and sonar 8.....the plug-in had to re-installed again...
    I double checked the control panel of my FW and it's in native tascam mode and using the latest 1.83 firmware from tascam.

    ORIGINAL: dcasey

    einstein36 - I’d like some clarification if you don’t mind. Are you saying that your FW-1884 is working fine as a control surface (motorized faders, jog wheel and all) in Sonar 8, without a Sonar specific (1.21 or 1.22 “beta”) control surface driver? You said that everything is working “like a champ” after uninstalling and re-installing – please clarify what you uninstalled and re-installed. Also, is your Tascam operating in FW-1884 Native mode or in one of the emulation modes? Further, I assume you are using the v183 firmware (latest) from the Tascam site.

    I apologize to all for my veil threat to abandon Cakewalk/Sonar after all these years. I’ve relegated the FW-1884 to control surface/digital patch bay only, but I’m not ready just yet to put it on eBay. Like others, I’m hopeful that Cakewalk/Roland will offer a control surface only version of the V Studio 700 (just the console), but until then I need the FW to live – with Sonar 8 of course.

    I don't know if I can sit here another day with an unopened box with Sonar 8 in it.

    The horror, the horror...

    #20
    Hexdigit62
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86
    • Joined: 2006/06/28 19:07:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 21:28:53 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: einstein36

    I have the 1.60 driver installed since I am using Vista 32 bit...




    einstein36 does SOFTLCD work omn Vista 32 bi2?
    post edited by Hexdigit62 - 2008/10/08 21:31:42

    Thanks
    John
    #21
    einstein36
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 511
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 21:38:31
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/08 21:52:11 (permalink)
    yes it does...
    me personally, I don't like it because it takes up screen real estate that sits at the bottom of one's monitor and thus can't see Sonar very well...

    ORIGINAL: Hexdigit62

    ORIGINAL: einstein36

    I have the 1.60 driver installed since I am using Vista 32 bit...




    einstein36 does SOFTLCD work omn Vista 32 bi2?

    #22
    stratoj
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 465
    • Joined: 2004/03/02 11:00:02
    • Location: ArKaNsAs, yee haw
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/09 11:48:46 (permalink)
    "yes it does...
    me personally, I don't like it because it takes up screen real estate that sits at the bottom of one's monitor and thus can't see Sonar very well..."

    You know you can "autohide" soft LCD, and it will hide itself off the screen until you drag your mouse to it.
    Just sharing.
    #23
    Hexdigit62
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86
    • Joined: 2006/06/28 19:07:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/09 16:02:10 (permalink)
    einstein36, thanks for the reply. Is SOFTCD included with the 1.60 vista driver or did you have to install from some older version? I’m doing a fresh install of Vista, SONAR 8, FW-1082(I know you are talking about the FW-1884) and was wondering where my source for SOFTLCD should come from because it doesn’t appear to be a part of the 1.60 driver I downloaded from TASCAM.

    Thanks
    John
    #24
    einstein36
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 511
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 21:38:31
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/09 16:31:02 (permalink)
    SoftLCD does come with the 1.60 driver, etc, but of course, it's suppose to load a shortcut on the desktop, but the actual .exe is not in the tascam folder underneath program files, but I think for some strange reason and thinking, tascam put the actual softlcd.exe program underneath windows or something like that..(I do apologize, but I am not at home right now..gotta do the stupid freaking 8-5 job thing to pay those bills hahahahaha
    )
    ORIGINAL: Hexdigit62

    einstein36, thanks for the reply. Is SOFTCD included with the 1.60 vista driver or did you have to install from some older version? I’m doing a fresh install of Vista, SONAR 8, FW-1082(I know you are talking about the FW-1884) and was wondering where my source for SOFTLCD should come from because it doesn’t appear to be a part of the 1.60 driver I downloaded from TASCAM.

    #25
    Hexdigit62
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86
    • Joined: 2006/06/28 19:07:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/09 20:59:00 (permalink)
    Hi,
    Thanks for the info and I know what you mean by the whole 8 to 5 thing….LOL. The V1.60 driver file seams kind of small to contain both SOFTLCD and the driver, 1.87MB. The V1.50 full installer file is 10MB. Are the FW-1884 files approximately the same size?
    post edited by Hexdigit62 - 2008/10/10 15:37:12

    Thanks
    John
    #26
    einstein36
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 511
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 21:38:31
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/10 23:12:52 (permalink)
    sorryit took me a little to write back..(damn day job *#&$*#$&)..anyways..no...the 1.60 driver is smaller, but it does contain the softlcd app within it...

    ORIGINAL: Hexdigit62

    Hi,
    Thanks for the info and I know what you mean by the whole 8 to 5 thing….LOL. The V1.60 driver file seams kind of small to contain both SOFTLCD and the driver, 1.87MB. The V1.50 full installer file is 10MB. Are the FW-1884 files approximately the same size?


    #27
    Hexdigit62
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86
    • Joined: 2006/06/28 19:07:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/10/11 10:23:22 (permalink)
    Very cool, they probably just compressed everything! I was thinking I would need to install the V1.50 full installer file first and then V1.60 driver over it just to get to where I need to be. You’ve been a tremendous help….!

    Thanks
    John
    #28
    DeeringAmps
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2614
    • Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
    • Location: Seattle area
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/11/23 22:02:12 (permalink)
    To all FW1884 Users.

    The concensus is that S8PE is a go?
    Remove the 1.6 driver and the 1.22 sonar plug-in and re-install, right?
    Jog wheel latency is a Sonar control surface problem.

    Any other advice?

    What about settings in the Tascam control panel.
    I'm setting the Audio Latency at 256 and seeing 5.8msec in the Sonar Audio setting.
    If I try to run the 1884 any lower than that I run into problems, that seem about right?

    TIA,
    Tom

    Win XP 32 SP2 2gB ram

    Tom Deering
    Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page
    Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins

    Win10x64
    StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM

    RME UFX (Audio)
    Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
    #29
    Mididreamer
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 422
    • Joined: 2003/11/20 14:32:14
    • Location: More than a decade using Cake / The Netherlands
    • Status: offline
    RE: Sonar 8PE and the FW-1884 2008/11/24 13:35:24 (permalink)
    Hi Tom,

    With Vista X64 1msec is possible on 64 But 5.8 msec is okay with Vista 32

    My music: https://soundcloud.com/midimine
    Sonar, Reason, Live, Project5, Fruityloops, Cubase / maschine 2/ Komplete /Intel i7 3770/ Asus Maximus V /Oxygen 8 V2/ Oxygen 61/ Novation Zero SL /Windows 10 / 64 

    Komplete Audio 6
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1