LockedHow does MC5 measure up?

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
Guest
Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4951
  • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
  • Status: online
2009/04/23 11:25:23 (permalink)

How does MC5 measure up?

Good Morning,

For those of you wondering just how different Music Creator 5 is from Music Creators past, check out the chart below:

Music Creator Comparison Chart

Best,
Kate
post edited by Kate Watt [Cakewalk] - 2009/04/23 11:34:48
#1

63 Replies Related Threads

    Robomusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8943
    • Joined: 2004/05/30 00:54:24
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 11:28:28 (permalink)
    We would love to kate, but that is not a link, and copy and paste did not work either.


    My bad there it is! Thanks
    post edited by Robomusic - 2009/04/23 11:44:01

    I'd Seize the day but i can't quite reach it!

    http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?AID=33477&T=1260
    Music Town
    #2
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 11:36:23 (permalink)
    it worked for me, Rob - it's a pdf that opens in the browser - she may have fixed the link, tho since she edited after you posted.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #3
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 11:44:42 (permalink)
    Kate - this comparison chart is excellent, thank you!

    one thing I don't see mentioned, however, is the "per track EQ" which is shown in the screen shots on the MC5 promos (including the one you posted in the sticky). is that a correct screen shot showing the PER TRACK EQ or is that an incorrect shot since you don't have that function listed in the comparison chart?

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #4
    yevster
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 761
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 02:07:47
    • Location: Eastern Massachusetts
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 11:53:23 (permalink)
    Simple instrument tracks have also been omitted. One assumes that instrument tracks count as 1 MIDI + 1 AUDIO toward the track limit?
    #5
    Samara Krugman
    SONAR REAC
    • Total Posts : 164
    • Joined: 2007/09/24 11:33:13
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 11:54:10 (permalink)
    Beagle - Music Creator 5 has the same per channel EQ as Home Studio 7 and SONAR.

    yevster - Simple Instrument tracks are in Music Creator 5. And yes, instrument tracks count as 1 MIDI and 1 Audio toward the track limit.
    post edited by Samara Krugman - 2009/04/23 12:03:22

    Samara Krugman
    Product Manager
    Cakewalk
    #6
    No How
    Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5180
    • Joined: 2006/05/02 11:56:01
    • Location: the boogie-woogie Isles
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 12:19:06 (permalink)
    My MC3 came with Edirol (and Dreamstation). Does this have Edirol or a similar multi-sampled VST? I didn't see one on comparison chart.

    Also: the EQ is a feature available and built into each track?

    Thank you.

    post edited by No How - 2009/04/23 12:27:06

    s o n g s

      – Beauty lodged in a bad hotel has no value.  Raymond Lull
    #7
    pbognar
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 720
    • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 12:22:15 (permalink)
    According to the news item on kvraudio.com, it HAS "per track eq" in the mixer.
    #8
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 12:28:02 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: No How

    My MC3 came with Edirol (and Dreamstation). Does this have Edirol or a similar multi-sampled VST? I didn't see one on comparison chart.

    Also: the EQ is a feature available and built into each track?

    Thank you.



    Rick - it has TTS-1 which is a GM2 softsynth (not sampled, but Edirol isn't either - they're both synths).

    and Samara answered the per track EQ question above - yes MC5 does have per track EQ.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #9
    RobertB
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11256
    • Joined: 2005/11/19 23:40:50
    • Location: Fort Worth, Texas
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 12:51:40 (permalink)
    Thanks, Kate.
    Some interesting stuff there.
    The Internal Mixing Engine is listed as 24 Bit. Surely that's a typo?
    It's good to see the Meter/Key view included.
    Page 3 looks nice.

    Some disparity between the content in the box vs download versions has been mentioned.
    I have been under the impression that the difference in price had to do with the pysical media in the past.
    I can understand wanting to keep the download file size small, but will the additional content be available as seperate downloads?
    The question is going to come up, so we might as well address it now.
    All in all, it looks like a decent package.

    My Soundclick Page
    SONAR Professional, X3eStudio,W7 64bit, AMD Athlon IIx4 2.8Ghz, 4GB RAM, 64bit, AKAI EIE Pro, Nektar Impact LX61,Alesis DM6,Alesis ControlPad,Yamaha MG10/2,Alesis M1Mk2 monitors,Samson Servo300,assorted guitars,Lava Lamp

    Shimozu-Kushiari or Bob
    #10
    No How
    Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5180
    • Joined: 2006/05/02 11:56:01
    • Location: the boogie-woogie Isles
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 14:27:01 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Beagle

    ORIGINAL: No How

    My MC3 came with Edirol (and Dreamstation). Does this have Edirol or a similar multi-sampled VST? I didn't see one on comparison chart.

    Also: the EQ is a feature available and built into each track?

    Thank you.



    Rick - it has TTS-1 which is a GM2 softsynth (not sampled, but Edirol isn't either - they're both synths).

    and Samara answered the per track EQ question above - yes MC5 does have per track EQ.


    Thanks for the info.

    The edirol i have has drums, asian instruments, all kinds of bass,....and it's a synth? wow.


    s o n g s

      – Beauty lodged in a bad hotel has no value.  Raymond Lull
    #11
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 14:38:37 (permalink)
    yes, Edirol VSC and Roland TTS-1 are both true GM2 synths. there are no samples - all sounds are generated.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #12
    Nick P
    Max Output Level: -44 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3112
    • Joined: 2006/09/01 18:08:09
    • Location: Area code 392 - Arlington Hts, IL
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/23 22:50:22 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Beagle

    yes, Edirol VSC and Roland TTS-1 are both true GM2 synths. there are no samples - all sounds are generated.


    Far for me to disagree with a guy with 18,000 + posts, but I don't think the idea of a synth being both GM and sample based are mutually exclusive. In fact, the original GM hardware synths from Roland were all based on the standard Roland sample set (the old Sound Canvas series). I think the VSC (Virtual Sound Canvas) and the TTS-1 are both sample based. Otherwise, how would they create an oboe or viola, albeit not the best sounding ones? No, they are both sample-based synths, and GM. I'm pretty sure about this, having dealt with sample-based synths (hardware and software) for close to 20 years.

    Cakewalk Forums - A Great Learning Resource For All Things Cakewalk!
    #13
    kine321
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 438
    • Joined: 2007/02/20 14:27:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 01:45:11 (permalink)
    Yes... they're sampled based synths. The drum sounds are obviously not synthesized. Also, the Roland groove synth loads it's sounds the same as TTS-1. You won't find an obvious folder that contains any samples because they're apparently in a compressed format that only the synths can read and use. That's why you see the decompressing dialog when you insert the plugs.
    #14
    kine321
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 438
    • Joined: 2007/02/20 14:27:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 02:08:01 (permalink)
    I'm guessing... the notion that the X-Gear software included with MC5,[which is listed under beginners software] may, somehow be any different than what [IK] has given away for free and is now bundling with most of their products, has been resolved or answered? NO extra special added amps just for MC5?

    No Amplitude2, Jimi Hendrix, or Metal amps included like pictured on [IK's] site and Kates post which BTW... shows an icon for IK's Stomp I/O device in the upper right corner! Those amps pictured are obviously full versions being hosted in X-Gear
    #15
    atonal
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 47
    • Joined: 2005/12/29 15:00:44
    • Location: So. California
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 10:02:35 (permalink)
    . . hmmm . . .

    So, one has yet 'anther' 30 day trial before one has to re-purchase the MP3 Encoding functionality . . ? Even if the MP3 encoder were previously purchased for ver 4 ??

    Kinda like being offered the opportunity to buy you same car once again, every 6 months . . .

    . . some nice stuff in here .. some extraneous arm waving also is included ..

    -- atonal
    #16
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 10:46:16 (permalink)
    No. if you've already purchased the mp3 encoder then you just have to re-authorize it from the file they sent you once you install MC5 (from what I've read on the forum). you don't have to pay for it again.

    and if you've lost the authorization file, they will send it to you again if you contact them.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #17
    atonal
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 47
    • Joined: 2005/12/29 15:00:44
    • Location: So. California
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 11:16:32 (permalink)
    very cool ..

    -- atonal
    #18
    Robomusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8943
    • Joined: 2004/05/30 00:54:24
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 12:05:01 (permalink)
    Guys, if you own an older version of MC with edirol and dreamstation, they will still show up in a newer version of MC, just to not uninstall the synths.

    Also on the synth sample issue, most GM sets are sample based as was Microsoft synth GS, the samples are just propriatary in nature.

    I'd Seize the day but i can't quite reach it!

    http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?AID=33477&T=1260
    Music Town
    #19
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 12:32:02 (permalink)
    rob - I really don't like to argue with you, but I will say this and if you disagree, then we can just agree to disagree about it and move on. but the synths like Edirol and TTS-1 are not sample based. they are true GM synthesizers - the sounds they make are generated, not sample accessed.

    synths create sounds by using filters and oscillators (all done in software for softsynths) to create the sounds. sampled sounds are actually recorded instruments and saved in a loop format for access by the sampler player. TTS-1 and Edirol do not have sample libraries to access for the sounds they make, they generate the sounds (otherwise they'd place a sample library on the hard drive along with the program).

    here's an excerpt from the TTS-1 description on cake's site (I've added bold italics to emphasize the points):
    TTS-1 GM2 synth — Your goto instrument for General MIDI sounds. TTS-1 is a high quality, multitimbral, multi-out GM2 synthesizer with a Roland® synth engine to generate amazing, expressive sounds. 256 instrument sounds and 9 drum sets, with the ability to create custom presets, 128-voice polyphony and up to 16 part multi-instrument playback. Built in reverb, chorus, delay, and EQ.

    from wiki on synths:
    http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synth
    this applies to softsynths as well - the only difference is that softsynths are software generated oscillators and filters while hardware synths (keyboards) do the same function with hardware.

    from wiki on sampler players:
    http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampler_(musical_instrument)

    I do agree that the MS GS Wavetable synth DOES access "sound libraries" similar to samplers - BUT - the big difference is that those libraries that the MS GS Wavetable access are actually just a table of generated sounds, not sampled recorded instruments, so instead of generating the sounds each time, MS has generated the sounds ONE time and put those generated sounds in a lookup table accessed by MIDI data.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #20
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 12:51:01 (permalink)
    Nick - I didn't read your posts until I posted this last one -

    I will gladly yield my position if you have evidence of TTS-1 being sample based. Everything I've read including what I posted above from cakewalk / Roland states that the sounds are generated.

    I have no malice or agenda, I'm only stating my opinion based on the evidence that I have read - if I'm wrong - that's fine I can ALWAYS accept being wrong, - but give me some evidence that says I am.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #21
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 12:52:54 (permalink)
    That's why you see the decompressing dialog when you insert the plugs.

    kine: I don't remember ever seeing that. I'll have to specifically load up TTS-1 tonite and watch for that message - but that is a good point.
    post edited by Beagle - 2009/04/24 13:01:32

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #22
    Robomusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8943
    • Joined: 2004/05/30 00:54:24
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 15:46:59 (permalink)
    Hey Beag, no arguement here with you. But i remember a while back mac explaining over at PG that the edirol was based on the same concept as the Microsoftsynth GS it just had a better version of the wavetable sound set and the synth around it to process them. The below is from Roland and PG sites, it explains that the GM sets are sampled from one note and then synthesized to full value. a true synth creats sound from filters and oscillators. But sample based synths creat from sample of various value. A GM set like VSC or TTS uses very small sample and then polishes them with the synth portion of the program, others like sampletank, or Kontact might use a larger more layered sample. Sound fonts are much like this as well, and also vary in depth and layers.

    VSC-3 Specifications
    • Number of Parts: 16
    • Maximum polyphony: 128 (may vary according to your computer's specifications).
    • Number of sounds: 546 sounds + 15 drum sets
    • Effects: reverb, chorus, delay.
    • Supports full control over sound parameters via any external sequencer. Contains a built-in SMF player for playback of Standard MIDI File songs plus playing MIDI tracks from the Internet.
    • Incredible sound quality achieved through 16-bit stereo sampling at 44.1kHz. Includes awesome 546 GM/GS compatible sounds and 15 drum sets built right in.
    • The VSC-3H features significantly quicker and smoother response during performance. Precise optimized settings can be made to suit your computer's processing power and operating environment.
    • Popular SMF player allows real time tempo and key changes to enhance your performance and take advantage the full potential of MIDI.
    • New part monitor window for listening to the sound you selected for each part and for muting any part in the same window. Now it's easier than ever to do "music minus one" performances for music lessons and entertainment with just the VSC-3H, without using an external sequencer.
    Up to 128-voice polyphony, 16-part, DXi/VST2 plug-ins and stand alone software synthesizers
    902 GM2/GS tones and 26 drum sets
    Up to 24-bit/96kHz resolution
    Reverb, Chorus and Delay effects
    TVF filters for fine-tuning of original wavetable sounds
    MIDI to WAVE/AIFF file conversion function

    I'd Seize the day but i can't quite reach it!

    http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?AID=33477&T=1260
    Music Town
    #23
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 16:15:34 (permalink)
    ok, Rob! that's good enough for me! I concede to you, Nick and kine!

    thanks for setting me straight!

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #24
    Robomusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8943
    • Joined: 2004/05/30 00:54:24
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 16:22:47 (permalink)
    You do not need stetting straight, just a bath and a little brushing will do! Radio, it's your turn to wash the dog!!

    Actually Beag you are not totally wrong. Wavetable works from the basis of a single note sample, then that note is synthesized to recreate the other notes and tones.


    See everyone is happy! Cause we are all right! Cept those who are left!
    post edited by Robomusic - 2009/04/24 16:35:40

    I'd Seize the day but i can't quite reach it!

    http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?AID=33477&T=1260
    Music Town
    #25
    marce
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 237
    • Joined: 2006/10/03 13:53:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 16:38:00 (permalink)
    I believe that the "tts-1-param.dat" 13mb, in it folder is the "soundfont" that have the wav data. Must be said, that they make things sound very good such programming trough so little wave sizes.
    #26
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 16:38:43 (permalink)
    wimper!

    yes - that's a good compromise!!!

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #27
    Robomusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8943
    • Joined: 2004/05/30 00:54:24
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 17:38:28 (permalink)
    18620 post ....................... dang Soooooomebody need something to do!

    I'd Seize the day but i can't quite reach it!

    http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?AID=33477&T=1260
    Music Town
    #28
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 19:07:47 (permalink)
    that's only an average of over 16.5 posts per day! CJ's is something like 23 posts per day!!

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #29
    SteveStrummerUK
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31112
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
    • Location: Worcester, England.
    • Status: offline
    RE: MC4 vs MC5 Comparison 2009/04/24 19:12:50 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Robomusic

    18620 post ....................... dang Soooooomebody need something to do!

    Actually Rob, I reckon he's slacking.

    Having beat CJ to 15,000 (with a little help!) he's now 1200 posts behind (19826 -v- 18623).

    Come on Beag - get your act together

     Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1