Yet Another Envelope Rant

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6907
  • Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
  • Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
  • Status: offline
2009/07/15 11:32:57 (permalink)

Yet Another Envelope Rant

PLEASE, Please, Pretty Please Cakewalk. Can you try and find out what makes your envelope's so damn iffy, touchy and un-predictable.
I just got done spending 2 hours on a mix. I was just about finished except I wanted to adjust a node on a volume envelope. When I clicked on the node I got the good'ol crash dump. I didn't even get a chance to adjust it yet. WTF? Lost all my work in the last 2 hours.

Enough already. This is a feature the should be rock solid by now. I know it's been said before but would it be asking too much to get things like this stable before offering some more useless toys in the next version?

In the mean time, does anyone know of any 3rd party plug-ins that might be able to offer stable envelopes? I doubt it, but if it means I don't have to deal with the buggy Sonar ones I'm willing to pay.

Rant Over!
Mike


Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW  
GA-Z77X-UD5H
Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 
2x Samsung 250GB SSD 
1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB 
Corsair H80i Liquid cooler 
Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm 
Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU 
Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
#1

80 Replies Related Threads

    Jose7822
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10031
    • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 11:47:25 (permalink)
    That's a very unique crash Mike. This sounds like one of those crashes that involves doing some ackward specific steps in order to reproduce it (unless you've been having it occur regularly). I'm saying this because I move envelope nodes all the time without Sonar crashing on me. It could also be a plugin that doesn't like envelopes. Can you reproduce this crash?


    P.S. I'm sure you now know why we always suggest to save often :-)

    #2
    kcearl
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 504
    • Joined: 2009/03/23 14:05:46
    • Location: Kanada
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 12:56:52 (permalink)
    I think assigning envelopes is Sonars worst feature...for me it is its largest let down after using Live and trying Samplitude..its an absolute breeze on them

    Oh and something like Logics Mainstage wouldn't go amiss

    and a tea making facility


    Mind you...love the rest of it

    Sonar 8 Studio, Ableton Live 8, XP Media SP2, Intel Dual Core 2.80Ghz, 4GB RAM, 500 & 250Gb SATA

    http://www.soundclick.com/trainsetghetto

    #3
    yorolpal
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13829
    • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 13:02:25 (permalink)
    Have to agree with the envelopes being flaky. My pet peeve with them is that many, many times when I try grab a node and move it it ends up moving the entire envelope. Or, worse, throws me into some expanded "selected" view of what I don't know...the expanded envelope view?? Sometime it just won't let me move a node at all until I've taken some other non-related mouse action. I use em all the time...but they scare me.

    https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
    https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
    Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
     
    SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
    #4
    Jose7822
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10031
    • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 13:03:22 (permalink)
    Yeah, I know. Automation in Sonar is a PITA. That's the reason why I created this thread (hope you join the cause):

    http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=1759430
    #5
    DW_Mike
    Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6907
    • Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
    • Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 15:59:58 (permalink)
    Thanks Jose.
    That's the problem I seem to have with my envelope issues. I can never reproduce them. Sometimes they work fine and sometimes they don't. And it always seems to be something new.
    LOL and yeah I know about the save and am usually really good with it. Actually I was just going to move that last node and hit save but I was one move too late.

    Mike

    Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW  
    GA-Z77X-UD5H
    Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
    32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 
    2x Samsung 250GB SSD 
    1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB 
    Corsair H80i Liquid cooler 
    Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm 
    Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU 
    Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
    #6
    arkiruthis
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 343
    • Joined: 2008/02/13 09:49:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 16:02:30 (permalink)
    I particularly dread orphaned envelopes. Once an envelope is orphaned, I know a crash is never very far away...

    Also, the selection of nodes seems to go wierd sometimes. If I select a node, sometimes I'll get a couple of others selected as well. If I delete one single node, sometimes 2 others get deleted at the same time.

    Perhaps time for a fresh implementation of envelopes. With Beziers.
    post edited by arkiruthis - 2009/07/15 16:03:49
    #7
    vocalid
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 190
    • Joined: 2008/10/01 09:50:39
    • Location: the middle of nowhere in Switzerland
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 16:32:30 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: arkiruthis

    Perhaps time for a fresh implementation of envelopes. With Beziers.



    +10000000


    ....even if I wouldn't ever need it, just think how cool the track view would look!!! (And yes Cakewalkers, looks sell!!)


    Goodbye
    #8
    Gregmang
    Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1592
    • Joined: 2003/12/31 07:21:57
    • Location: Maryland USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 17:09:54 (permalink)
    yes, envelopes are the weakest part of an otherwise stellar product (S8).
    #9
    jb
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2020
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:45:25
    • Location: heart of late capitalist darkness
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 17:49:16 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: yorolpal

    My pet peeve with them is that many, many times when I try grab a node and move it it ends up moving the entire envelope. Or, worse, throws me into some expanded "selected" view of what I don't know...the expanded envelope view?? Sometime it just won't let me move a node at all until I've taken some other non-related mouse action. I use em all the time...but they scare me.

    Are you using the envelope tool? Making sure you haven't accidentally selected the entire envelope?

    Celeron 300A o/c 450, SBLive, Win98SE
    #10
    ...wicked
    Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7360
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
    • Location: Seattle
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 18:06:33 (permalink)
    +1, I find envelopes to have some quirky behaviors too.

    Ever since they shrunk the node size, I almost always end up moving a whole envelope at one point. I hate that.

    And also agree that they have unpredictable behavior in large projects with a lot of plugs. Sometimes they stop responding, sometimes they stick, and sometimes they flat out crash.

    And yah, finally, the lack of good drawing tools has been noted for several versions now. Seems like a great time to rip the guts out and put a better enveloping system in. I use them extensively when mixing, so I'd LOVE to see some new whiz-bang in them, if not simple stability.

    ===========
    The Fog People
    ===========

    Intel i7-4790 
    16GB RAM
    ASUS Z97 
    Roland OctaCapture
    Win10/64   

    SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
    billions VSTs, some of which work    
    #11
    Honest_Al
    Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3642
    • Joined: 2005/12/09 00:07:27
    • Location: just below the cloud on the left
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 18:11:49 (permalink)
    PLEASE, Please, Pretty Please Cakewalk. Can you try and find out what makes your envelope's so damn iffy, touchy and un-predictable.


    +1! ..and Hi Mike, good to "see" you! Thanks for pushing this (once again)..thx also go to Jose.

    I tried hard NOT to post here (i'm moving in 3 days and really got to continue packing!) but I couldn't resist - there's too much history to all this ;)

    At the end of 2005 we finally got freehand drawing (Ron Kuper was kind enough to listen and realize it's needed) and that's after years of complaining here about automation of VST's and envelopes in general.. i was always a complainer, right.. hundreds of posts, many "please please please make it right this time" etc.

    funny, I found this one now - http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=340600&mpage=1&key=RSI񓊒 ..there are older ones of course
    #12
    Jose7822
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10031
    • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 18:14:23 (permalink)
    Wow Sonar 4!

    That's some history alright.

    #13
    Marah
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 975
    • Joined: 2009/02/04 21:56:41
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 18:18:53 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: jb

    Are you using the envelope tool? Making sure you haven't accidentally selected the entire envelope?



    Yes it's important to be sure you have the right tool selected.

    But that gets to a bigger problem, which is that it shouldn't be necessary to switch to separate tool in the first place.

    The actions of the mouse pointer should be determined by the context of the click. Unnecessary tool switching slows the UI.
    #14
    Jose7822
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10031
    • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 18:22:16 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Marah

    Unnecessary tool switching slows the UI.



    Actually, it slows me :-P

    #15
    Marah
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 975
    • Joined: 2009/02/04 21:56:41
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 18:55:02 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Jose7822


    ORIGINAL: Marah

    Unnecessary tool switching slows the UI.



    Actually, it slows me :-P




    #16
    dontletmedrown
    Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1722
    • Joined: 2006/09/09 13:52:26
    • Location: Camarillo, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 19:12:25 (permalink)
    Add me to the list of people that would love to see some automation improvements. The main improvement I want: to be able to adjust multiple envelopes (on different tracks) at the same time. I don't want to have to send them to a bus and create a bus envelope (since that makes it a pain in the ass to do basic volume adjustments on the bus).
    #17
    yorolpal
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13829
    • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 20:11:16 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Marah


    ORIGINAL: jb

    Are you using the envelope tool? Making sure you haven't accidentally selected the entire envelope?



    Yes it's important to be sure you have the right tool selected.

    But that gets to a bigger problem, which is that it shouldn't be necessary to switch to separate tool in the first place.

    The actions of the mouse pointer should be determined by the context of the click. Unnecessary tool switching slows the UI.


    Yup, I'm using the right...er...tool. Or I am one. Or something. But Marah is exactly right about this...why on earth do I need to "select" umpteen tools?? Context mousing. +1
    (might even make a good band name)

    https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
    https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
    Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
     
    SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
    #18
    Marah
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 975
    • Joined: 2009/02/04 21:56:41
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 20:42:34 (permalink)
    Plus if I'm not mistaken... when the mouse crosses over into the bus pane, it automatically switches to envelope mode, since there's nothing else there for you to edit.

    That automatic switch makes some sense. But it's inconsistent with how it works in the track section, where you have to switch.

    Obviously... one could argue... that there ARE other objects there to be edited, so what I'm calling an inconsistency is really just a difference in functionality between buses and tracks. But the need to switch tools unnecesarily exaggerates and even enforces that difference.

    In practice, in terms of how you approach "envelopes" they're the same no matter where they are. When I want to select a node and move it down 4db, , I want to select a node and move it down 4db. There's no reason it should be different just because it's on a track instead of a bus. In both places, they do the exact same thing: change the level of their respective channels.

    The way it works now is the essence of unintuitive. You can LEARN how it works, and then remember how it works (except when it momentarily slips your mind), and that can look and feel very similar to "intuitive." But it's not at all. It's way too procedural. The less thinking and conscious memory and context-parsing required, the better. That's intuitive.
    #19
    SongCraft
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3902
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 21:07:47 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: arkiruthis

    I particularly dread orphaned envelopes. Once an envelope is orphaned, I know a crash is never very far away...

    Also, the selection of nodes seems to go wierd sometimes. If I select a node, sometimes I'll get a couple of others selected as well. If I delete one single node, sometimes 2 others get deleted at the same time.

    Perhaps time for a fresh implementation of envelopes. With Beziers.

    That does seem to be the case but I haven't had a crash yet, I try to limit the amount of nodes as less as possible and not use envelopes at all unless it's absolutely necessary.

    I agree that envelopes needs improvements! Switching tools (as Marah said) shouldn't be necessary either. Improvements be it envelope lanes, envelope event lists, manager, inspector, toolbar but with focus being on 'stability and easier, faster workflow' such as 'new key commands' for entering and editing including show/hide and nudge, setup various options, and a new "singular node' with time set in minutes, beats or measures set either L, R or C that would be ideal for easier, quicker handling for example: peaks, cuts, or on/off, fades and options to adjust time in curves but also have presets in options that can be altered by highlighting a curve and using nudge. Earlier this year I submitted ideas to FR, I suggest if anyone else has ideas to improve envelopes to submit them to FR.


     
     
    #20
    MatsonMusicBox
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 879
    • Joined: 2008/07/09 10:56:31
    • Location: Hanover, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 21:17:30 (permalink)
    could some improvements be made? yeah, of course, but gotta tell ya - I just don't have that much trouble working with envelopes and I do it a lot. 90% of my original gripes were "cured" by just remembering to actually select the envelope tool instead of the regular pointer.

    #21
    randwool
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12
    • Joined: 2008/10/16 23:18:12
    • Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 21:27:56 (permalink)
    Global Options>Auto-save

    Randy
    #22
    musec07
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 390
    • Joined: 2007/03/22 13:54:21
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/15 22:25:45 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: yorolpal

    Have to agree with the envelopes being flaky. My pet peeve with them is that many, many times when I try grab a node and move it it ends up moving the entire envelope. Or, worse, throws me into some expanded "selected" view of what I don't know...the expanded envelope view?? Sometime it just won't let me move a node at all until I've taken some other non-related mouse action. I use em all the time...but they scare me.


    I constantly experience this problem.

    This has become so familiar to me... What I do now is click in the track below...anywhere to the left of the node I just assigned or wish to modify.
    It changes the node color from white back to green (the colors of my particular layout...yours may vary).

    Upon intial assignment of modification of a node... it seems the program feature becomes somewhat volatile... at any one time the program could just "VANISH" as SONAR has been wont to do since back before I can reacall... the program may freeze or the whole envelope may move up and down...

    YEP... I know this behavior well.

    YOU ARE NOT ALONE AS YOU THOUGHT MY OL PAL

    Some of my music is here:
    [link=http://www.reverbnation.com/roycunningham]www.reverbnation.com/roycunningham
    [/link]

    SONAR X1a / PE 8.5.1
    ASUS P5K-V Intel P33 Express
    Intel Quad E6300
    WD 7200 RPM 1 tbC Hitachi 7200 RPM 250gb F  
    ATI Radeon HD 5400
    NI Audio Kontrol 1 
    Win7 64 bit 8 GB RAM 





    #23
    dbmusic
    Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1150
    • Joined: 2005/07/04 12:52:46
    • Location: Illinois
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/16 00:48:53 (permalink)
    Using the E and T keys to switch back and forth to the Envelope Tool doesn't seem all that unintuitive or in any way workflow prohibitive to me. Once I started using the Envelope Tool my life in Sonar became a lot easier (I can't tell you how many times I've opened that damn loop explorer view because I double-clicked and missed the envelope ). Then there was was that weird bug where if you accidentally right-clicked on a node and brought up the track pop-up menu it would freeze the entire envelope.

    While I've always managed to do what I needed to do with envelopes I will agree they are rather clumsily implemented. Envelopes can be a very useful sound sculpting tool and deserve much more developmental consideration toward a more elegant design.

    Best regards,

    DB

    DB Music

    SoundClick
    OurStage
    #24
    musec07
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 390
    • Joined: 2007/03/22 13:54:21
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/16 00:58:13 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: dbmusic

    Using the E and T keys to switch back and forth to the Envelope Tool doesn't seem all that unintuitive or in any way workflow prohibitive to me. Once I started using the Envelope Tool my life in Sonar became a lot easier (I can't tell you how many times I've opened that damn loop explorer view because I double-clicked and missed the envelope ). Then there was was that weird bug where if you accidentally right-clicked on a node and brought up the track pop-up menu it would freeze the entire envelope.

    While I've always managed to do what I needed to do with envelopes I will agree they are rather clumsily implemented. Envelopes can be a very useful sound sculpting tool and deserve much more developmental consideration toward a more elegant design.

    Best regards,

    DB


    Hear!
    Hear!

    I just wrapped up a product with a lot of volume envelopes... as long as I do as I stated above... it works perfectly and yes they deserve some more attention in SONAR...

    ACID Pro 7 is great to work on the fly with envelopes... BUT I'm betting SONAR will make 'em look silly after a while!
    I hope!

    Some of my music is here:
    [link=http://www.reverbnation.com/roycunningham]www.reverbnation.com/roycunningham
    [/link]

    SONAR X1a / PE 8.5.1
    ASUS P5K-V Intel P33 Express
    Intel Quad E6300
    WD 7200 RPM 1 tbC Hitachi 7200 RPM 250gb F  
    ATI Radeon HD 5400
    NI Audio Kontrol 1 
    Win7 64 bit 8 GB RAM 





    #25
    SongCraft
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3902
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/16 06:18:49 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: randwool

    Global Options>Auto-save

    Auto-save mistakes too I guess LOL!!

    IMHO I prefer to always use Ctrl+S after an edit that I actually want to save.

     
     
    #26
    MatsonMusicBox
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 879
    • Joined: 2008/07/09 10:56:31
    • Location: Hanover, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/16 07:05:45 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: dbmusic

    Using the E and T keys to switch back and forth to the Envelope Tool doesn't seem all that unintuitive or in any way workflow prohibitive to me. Once I started using the Envelope Tool my life in Sonar became a lot easier ........


    Yep - exactly what I was saying - I think many or most of the problems described happen when people try to use the regular pointer tool on the envelopes - that is really finicky I agree - but like I said, just choosing the right tool has made it easy-breazy fro me, to the point where my remaining envelope complaints are very minor.
    post edited by MatsonMusicBox - 2009/07/16 07:06:17
    #27
    SongCraft
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3902
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/16 07:45:56 (permalink)
    Hi dbmusic

    I agree. As you said; the way envelopes are implemented in SONAR is clumsy and needs development! (This has been discussed for more than a year or so)


    I use envelopes in all my songs, I also use key commands all the time for ease + speedier workflow. If possible I only use envelopes if it's absolutely necessary because I like to keep my projects uncomplicated and well organized.

    That said,.. I think you may have misunderstood my previous post when I said 'envelopes needs improvements' - 'Switching tools shouldn't be necessary either' ---- what I meant if in 'future upgrade release' Cakewalk enhanced the workflow handling (editing) of envelopes/nodes so that switching tool would not be necessary but rather the need for new key commands for things more important such as show/hide envelopes, latch, change curve, insert predefined envelope setups, presets, options, a lot of ideas over the years have already been suggested not only by me but by others!

    As you said, you want developments?, then I strongly suggest submitting your ideas to FR because CW has said many times that is the preferred method.
    -

     
     
    #28
    DeveryH
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 780
    • Joined: 2004/12/01 21:27:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/16 08:18:52 (permalink)
    The only time I have problems with envelopes is after about two hours of editing. I will let you know that I tend to save after every edit. The thing that happens time and time again after long sessions is I will go to edit the envelope/node (e.g. I will move the node down or up) and it will pop back into place. Once it does this I know I need to save and restart. Why it does this I have no idea. Once I figured it out it has become a non issue. Other than that I think Sonar's automation and envelopes are spot on.
    #29
    dbmusic
    Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1150
    • Joined: 2005/07/04 12:52:46
    • Location: Illinois
    • Status: offline
    RE: Yet Another Envelope Rant 2009/07/16 08:48:37 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: SongCraft

    As you said, you want developments?, then I strongly suggest submitting your ideas to FR because CW has said many times that is the preferred method.


    SongCraft,

    Like you mentioned, the need for envelope improvement has been discussed for quite some time now and are well known. I do believe that threads such as this one are valuable in keeping such issues in the forefront. I have to admit though it gets a little frustrating when obvious needs for improvement do not get implemented in release after release. The simple need or key binding a clip envelope is one...or better yet, just do what Samplitude does and automatically place a volume envelope on all audio clips.

    ORIGINAL: spanky

    The only time I have problems with envelopes is after about two hours of editing. I will let you know that I tend to save after every edit. The thing that happens time and time again after long sessions is I will go to edit the envelope/node (e.g. I will move the node down or up) and it will pop back into place. Once it does this I know I need to save and restart. Why it does this I have no idea. Once I figured it out it has become a non issue. Other than that I think Sonar's automation and envelopes are spot on.


    Hi spanky,

    This is a known envelope bug (at least it's been discussed here and problem reports have been submitted). It happens when you are left-clicking and dragging and envelope node and accidentally right-click your mouse.

    Best regards,

    DB

    DB Music

    SoundClick
    OurStage
    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1