ba_midi
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14061
- Joined: 2003/11/05 16:58:18
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 00:44:13
(permalink)
I was reading the built-in help (F1 when in Sonar) and searched on Sysex. There are a few sections about recording and playing back sysex data in REALTIME. So Tom - you may want to revisit those help sections. Also - In GLOBAL OPTIONS->MIDI there's a check box for Recording Sysex data and the ability to set the # of buffers. I don't know if Tom's looked at all this, but in case he hasn't, I'm mentioning it now. Seems there might be a way, but I didn't read everything (due to time constraints).
|
ba_midi
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14061
- Joined: 2003/11/05 16:58:18
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 00:50:39
(permalink)
Here's a snippet from the F1 help file ... You don’t need to use Sysx meta-events for sending System Exclusive information at the beginning of your project. Instead, use the Auto option for System Exclusive banks. Banks that are marked Auto are transmitted automatically by SONAR when it loads the project file they are stored in. Use the Sysx meta-event only when you need to send a Sysx Bank during the middle of the project.
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 03:01:47
(permalink)
thanks bamidi - and thansk to frank & to nokey and to all others: its pretty INCREDIBLE how arrogant people can be: 1: you obviously semm to JUST DONT GET THE POINT 2 you obviously lack the knowledege that what i want to do (as frank said) is TOTALLY normal 3: because you dont use it it doesnt mean its not good 4: if you think its so silly dont use it, and LEAVE ME ALONE 5: people seem NOT to fully read postings or threads and still they reply all sort of stuff. 6; i have specified that i have thoroughly investigated and completely described the ONLY whay sonar habndles what i want 7: its definitely NOT up to any of you wise guys to question my workflow 8: my workflow is completely supproted by other apps 9: ther is a proverb here saying : "the farmer doesnt eat what he doesnt know" this obviously apllies to some folks here - and its nothing to be proud of if its all so stupid why does sonar support a crippled way of doing it anyway? this thread just OBVIOUSLY is degenerating like most threads thanks to folks who (might even having a helpful intention) just mix all up and instead of helping make picky remarks remember: just because YOU dont know something or YOU dont like something it doesnt mean a thing - i didnt ask for any "personal tastes" here - i asked for a procedure - thats it ... also i have now 100% of the knowledge about this particular issue - so please dont come up with further "ides" or hints what could "eventually" be done or work - cos it wont! this kind of thread again shows why this forum is such a "particular" place - there are forums where "all" people try to help instead of suggesting that a user with a request is a fool. is it so hard to accept that i have been usin sysex dumps of single sounds in the middle of many songs for many years on many synths in many applications - with no data hickups, never realzing it could/should be different in sonar? obviously now a few people will feel offended and say that i am an ungreatful guy and that still my workflow is crap...guys what should i say to you? - rational people would just say "intersting way of using this-thanks for the idea, but eventualy it still doesnt fit my own workflow" but what do i know anyway - guess i have been earning money making music in the last 15 yeras and being pretty well informed about themes regarding this just by luck because if i read some replies here suggesting that i must be somehow silly i wonder how i have done it also its funny that one can post as accurate and detailed infos as possible and still people will nag about something that isnt even fact related any other suggestions on what i should use or how? i could post a list of my effective working routines and then you can post replies if YOU think they are "OK" because you knew them
post edited by info@tomflair.com - 2010/07/02 03:06:12
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
ba_midi
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14061
- Joined: 2003/11/05 16:58:18
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 03:12:47
(permalink)
Tom, I'd be curious to know if any of that help stuff I posted was of any use. The more I read it, the more it seems there are some things you can do - albeit not as clearly as one might think initially. PS - don't get all hung up about the other attitudes you sense. Some of the guys are actually trying to be helpful, but it tends to come off harsh when just 'reading it.' Only because I've seen how helpful some of them can be, do I know that they actually mean it with good intentions. Separate the style from the substance if ya can ;) Anyway - I really am curious if any of the meta-events and other sysex stuff in that help file is of any use to ya.
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 03:23:25
(permalink)
ba_midi Tom, I'd be curious to know if any of that help stuff I posted was of any use. The more I read it, the more it seems there are some things you can do - albeit not as clearly as one might think initially. PS - don't get all hung up about the other attitudes you sense. Some of the guys are actually trying to be helpful, but it tends to come off harsh when just 'reading it.' Only because I've seen how helpful some of them can be, do I know that they actually mean it with good intentions. Separate the style from the substance if ya can ;) Anyway - I really am curious if any of the meta-events and other sysex stuff in that help file is of any use to ya. hello & thanks --- umfortunately it looks like the the restriction of 255byte per dump in track mode is just there without any chance to do anything about it... as i have posted before i have now read everything that i could find and done all sort of testing but there definitely is only the 12 steps procedure that i have described in detail in the other thread...actuyll you are right what should i care - but what really makes me angry is all those pretentious assumptions on what is right or what works... the worst thing s that people here try to enforce the "truth" that there is something "complicated" or whatever about my approach - so i dont know ehats complicated on pressing "dump" on a synth and then having a sound saved wherever one likes it within less than a second.... look: its like the way it often happens here: sonar cant do it? so if you want to do it anyway you must be an idiot....and even mentioning that in many other "worlds" it works like a charm seems NOT to be a valid argument ...what shoudl one do with such posters?
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
NoKey
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 974
- Joined: 2008/10/28 15:30:19
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 03:44:17
(permalink)
Maybe this will help you Tom, " Recording & Playing Back SysEx Here's a tip that applies to older versions of Sonar as well as Sonar 4. If you use outboard MIDI gear with Sonar, you're probably taking advantage of system exclusive messages to save their patches and setups. If 'System Exclusive' is ticked under Options / Global / MIDI, Sonar can record SysEx data into a MIDI track and play it back. Unfortunately, the message length limit is 255 bytes — enough to send a control setting or similar, but certainly not enough for even the most modestly-sized MIDI synthesizer preset. However, if you use the Sysx View (which can store up to 8,192 banks of SysEx messages), there is a way to 'embed' triggers for the SysEx banks in a track, and have them play back at any time.  The event list shows two events that trigger playback of SysEx banks. Note that Global Options has been set to record system exclusive data. The event list shows two events that trigger playback of SysEx banks. Note that Global Options has been set to record system exclusive data. If you're not familiar with the Sysx View, see the July 2002 Sonar Notes; it's a window you call up by going View / Sysx, and it serves as a recorder/playback library for MIDI SysEx messages. It also lets you rename, store, load, auto-send (ie. certain messages can be sent when you open a project), and even edit SysEx messages, which can be as short as a single preset or as long as an entire bulk dump. The contents of the Sysx View are saved with a project. To play back a SysEx bank from within a track, place the 'Now' time where you want Sonar to send the data, then open up the MIDI track's Event List view by going View / Event List (or typing Alt-4). Next, hit the computer keyboard's Insert key to insert an Event into the Event List at the 'Now' time position. Double-click in the Event's 'Kind' field. When the 'Kind of Event' window appears, check 'Sysx Bank' under Special, then click on 'OK'. In the Event List entry's Data field, enter the number of the SysEx bank that should play back at this particular 'Now' time. When the project plays back and the 'Now' time arrives at the position you specified, the SysEx data will play back. Sending a big bulk dump will take a while, and some instruments may 'choke' when receiving one from Sonar. If all you need to do is change a patch, you're probably better off saving individual patches as SysEx banks and triggering them. So wouldn't it be easier just to insert program changes instead? Yes, except that this assumes you have the same presets loaded into your instrument that were loaded when you inserted the program change command. If you edit and tweak programs a lot, that may not be the case. By sending SysEx, you're sending the actual program data itself, not just something that calls up a particular memory slot. If you save your outboard gear parameters in Sonar, as long as you back up your project you've also backed up the data needed to recreate the project — which is highly recommended. ******************************** The webpage is: http://www.soundonsound.c...rticles/sonarnotes.htm
|
ba_midi
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14061
- Joined: 2003/11/05 16:58:18
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 03:46:41
(permalink)
its like the way it often happens here: sonar cant do it? so if you want to do it anyway you must be an idiot....and even mentioning that in many other "worlds" it works like a charm seems NOT to be a valid argument ...what shoudl one do with such posters? Well, first - "meta events" (which I didn't read up much on) sounded like it might be of some use, but I guess not if you've checked all that out. I don't know, maybe there is a way to circumvent the 255byte limit. I actually didn't see a reference to that limit in what I was reading, but I didn't go too deep. As for the other stuff - I have been trying to teach myself to simply ignore anything that comes off inappropriate or insensitive on forums. Mostly because I think it's too easy to mis-read things since we can't hear people's tone. While some tonality certainly comes through even in type, it's still possible to get it wrong. But, I just try to stick to the substance as best I can. We're all human, so it's not always easy, but the effort is worth it. Sometimes I read what I might think are dumb posts, but then I realize someone might think I'm dumb too ;) We don't always know what we don't know, and don't always 'get' that we don't (or others don't) 'get it'. Well, I wish I had more suggestions for ya on the sysex thing. Perhaps finding a workaround for now isn't such a bad idea. Be well.
post edited by ba_midi - 2010/07/02 03:47:46
|
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12016
- Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
- Location: Putnam County, NY
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 03:55:46
(permalink)
Hi- I agree with Frank, FWIW. It's not as though if enough people pile on and tell Tom he's doing it "wrong" he'll suddenly see the "error of his ways". He's repeated what he wants to be able to do, and that he can do it in other sequencers, and that he wishes he could do it just as easily in SONAR, simple as that. There's no reason at all to ridicule him, IMO. I almost always use an auto-send bank in Sysex Manager to set up my Motif with channels going to different audio outs, etc., and I'm really glad that feature's available. I've never tried recording sysex in real time, but I do remember a while ago wondering why SONAR couldn't load/play back a .syx file in a MIDI track. That was basically just idle curiosity, since I had no need for it to, but it is possible in other sequencers. The largest sysex file I've played back that way contained 4244 bytes, but I don't know what the practical limit is, since that was my Motif's complete bulk dump. The Sysx Banks can contain "one or more very large System Exclusive messages", but I also remember running into SONAR's 255-byte Data Event limit during my idle experiments. I'm sure there's a reason for the limit, but I don't know what it is. I suspect it's a "computer thing", much like the 128-byte limit on Text Events. Which isn't to say it couldn't be upped. Tom, if SONAR let you insert a .syx file as a MIDI clip anywhere you wanted that might be a partial solution (?) -- assuming I'm reading you right (you'd still have to record it somehow, obviously). I don't know how much support there'd be for it (not too much, judging from this thread!  ), but I guess the only way you could really do what you want is if they increase the Data Event size limit. -Susan
2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAMWindows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 04:05:50
(permalink)
NoKey Maybe this will help you Tom, " Recording & Playing Back SysEx Here's a tip that applies to older versions of Sonar as well as Sonar 4. If you use outboard MIDI gear with Sonar, you're probably taking advantage of system exclusive messages to save their patches and setups. If 'System Exclusive' is ticked under Options / Global / MIDI, Sonar can record SysEx data into a MIDI track and play it back. Unfortunately, the message length limit is 255 bytes — enough to send a control setting or similar, but certainly not enough for even the most modestly-sized MIDI synthesizer preset. However, if you use the Sysx View (which can store up to 8,192 banks of SysEx messages), there is a way to 'embed' triggers for the SysEx banks in a track, and have them play back at any time. The event list shows two events that trigger playback of SysEx banks. Note that Global Options has been set to record system exclusive data. The event list shows two events that trigger playback of SysEx banks. Note that Global Options has been set to record system exclusive data. If you're not familiar with the Sysx View, see the July 2002 Sonar Notes; it's a window you call up by going View / Sysx, and it serves as a recorder/playback library for MIDI SysEx messages. It also lets you rename, store, load, auto-send (ie. certain messages can be sent when you open a project), and even edit SysEx messages, which can be as short as a single preset or as long as an entire bulk dump. The contents of the Sysx View are saved with a project. To play back a SysEx bank from within a track, place the 'Now' time where you want Sonar to send the data, then open up the MIDI track's Event List view by going View / Event List (or typing Alt-4). Next, hit the computer keyboard's Insert key to insert an Event into the Event List at the 'Now' time position. Double-click in the Event's 'Kind' field. When the 'Kind of Event' window appears, check 'Sysx Bank' under Special, then click on 'OK'. In the Event List entry's Data field, enter the number of the SysEx bank that should play back at this particular 'Now' time. When the project plays back and the 'Now' time arrives at the position you specified, the SysEx data will play back. Sending a big bulk dump will take a while, and some instruments may 'choke' when receiving one from Sonar. If all you need to do is change a patch, you're probably better off saving individual patches as SysEx banks and triggering them. So wouldn't it be easier just to insert program changes instead? Yes, except that this assumes you have the same presets loaded into your instrument that were loaded when you inserted the program change command. If you edit and tweak programs a lot, that may not be the case. By sending SysEx, you're sending the actual program data itself, not just something that calls up a particular memory slot. If you save your outboard gear parameters in Sonar, as long as you back up your project you've also backed up the data needed to recreate the project — which is highly recommended. ******************************** The webpage is: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan05/articles/sonarnotes.htm LOL - well thanks for trying to help me (your good intention) but this is EXCATLY the link i already posted MYSELF in order to describe what happens within sonar in POST nr.14 :-)
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 04:15:32
(permalink)
Susan G Hi- I agree with Frank, FWIW. It's not as though if enough people pile on and tell Tom he's doing it "wrong" he'll suddenly see the "error of his ways". He's repeated what he wants to be able to do, and that he can do it in other sequencers, and that he wishes he could do it just as easily in SONAR, simple as that. There's no reason at all to ridicule him, IMO. I almost always use an auto-send bank in Sysex Manager to set up my Motif with channels going to different audio outs, etc., and I'm really glad that feature's available. I've never tried recording sysex in real time, but I do remember a while ago wondering why SONAR couldn't load/play back a .syx file in a MIDI track. That was basically just idle curiosity, since I had no need for it to, but it is possible in other sequencers. The largest sysex file I've played back that way contained 4244 bytes, but I don't know what the practical limit is, since that was my Motif's complete bulk dump. The Sysx Banks can contain "one or more very large System Exclusive messages", but I also remember running into SONAR's 255-byte Data Event limit during my idle experiments. I'm sure there's a reason for the limit, but I don't know what it is. I suspect it's a "computer thing", much like the 128-byte limit on Text Events. Which isn't to say it couldn't be upped. Tom, if SONAR let you insert a .syx file as a MIDI clip anywhere you wanted that might be a partial solution (?) -- assuming I'm reading you right (you'd still have to record it somehow, obviously). I don't know how much support there'd be for it (not too much, judging from this thread! ), but I guess the only way you could really do what you want is if they increase the Data Event size limit. -Susan thanks a lot susan - it really helps me that a few people join in and defend (or at least understand) my point of view :-) if i am right now its 4:4 in this thread - LOL funny anyway that people haveo to claim something is silly just because they never used it (or had the chance to use it cos it doesnt work easily within their application) and obviously i never wanted toc onvert anyone to something that they dont like - but why would they want to convert me by suggestibg that my approach is weird? a mad world isnt it ? ;-)
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
NoKey
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 974
- Joined: 2008/10/28 15:30:19
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 05:40:27
(permalink)
Hi Tom, I don't recall you posting this: "However, if you use the Sysx View (which can store up to 8,192 banks of SysEx messages), there is a way to 'embed' triggers for the SysEx banks in a track, and have them play back at any time." ,.... which the article above details, and explains how you can circumvent some limits.
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 09:05:13
(permalink)
NoKey Hi Tom, I don't recall you posting this: "However, if you use the Sysx View (which can store up to 8,192 banks of SysEx messages), there is a way to 'embed' triggers for the SysEx banks in a track, and have them play back at any time." ,.... which the article above details, and explains how you can circumvent some limits. please nokey - i know you wanna help me :-) but this detail doesnt change the fact that the procedure itself is way to complicated ...its STILL the 12 steps i mentioned in the other thread (or at least step 7 to 12) - there is nothing to do about it..NO other approach - NO workaround THIS is the ONLY available routine to get a midi dump bigger than 255byte anywheer in a miditrack 1: open sysex-view 2: arm the recieving status 3: select the way how the signal transmission is activated 4: send dump from synth 5: confirm dump has been fully transmitted 6: remember the bank number (because names are not displayed later in the event insert !!!) 7: select a midiclip 8: open the event list 9: insert an event pressing "ins" 10 :choose eventtype 11: choose number of eventtype 12: specify the time of the event - because in contrary to the manuals claim the inserted event is NOT where the nowtime is allocated but at the end of the selcted clip... best regards
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
daveny5
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16934
- Joined: 2003/11/06 09:54:36
- Location: North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 09:13:31
(permalink)
OK... we get it. So why not submit it as a feature request to the Sonar developers for a future release. That's how changes get made.
Dave Computer: Intel i7, ASROCK H170M, 16GB/5TB+, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, TASCAM US-16x08, Cakewalk UM-3G MIDI I/F Instruments: SL-880 Keyboard controller, Korg 05R/W, Korg N1R, KORG Wavestation EX Axes: Fender Stratocaster, Line6 Variax 300, Ovation Acoustic, Takamine Nylon Acoustic, Behringer GX212 amp, Shure SM-58 mic, Rode NT1 condenser mic. Outboard: Mackie 1402-VLZ mixer, TC Helicon VoiceLive 2, Digitech Vocalist WS EX, PODXTLive, various stompboxes and stuff. Controllers: Korg nanoKONTROL, Wacom Bamboo Touchpad
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 09:18:08
(permalink)
daveny5 OK... we get it. So why not submit it as a feature request to the Sonar developers for a future release. That's how changes get made. yes - thats a positive suggestion - thanks :-)
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 12:27:44
(permalink)
Oh well. In my own way, I was trying to be helpful. Even though it's usually true that it's nearly impossible to convince someone to try a different approach, I thought I'd try to encourage you to try the more usual way of doing what you need, Tom, since wrestling with this Sysex approach has obviously been so maddening for you. Speaking for myself, I didn't mean that what you're trying to do is the "wrong" way so much as the less efficient way. I think that would be difficult to disagree with, since in post after post you've been showing us how convoluted and laborious your approach is. And we've been trying to point out that all that hassle can be avoided with the simple, straight forward Patch Change approach. I doubt if what you're asking for would be a feature request that would be taken very seriously, but of course I could be wrong. The SysEx view is extremely helpful. Once your customized data is parked in there, it becomes part of your project, and any number of hardware synths can be quickly set the way you want when you open up the project. Nobody's been suggesting you shouldn't use that- it's the only efficient way to tie hardware synths into your projects. If you have custom patches for a project, those can also be in that Sysex dump, setting User Patches slots in your synths the way you need.Then during the course of the song, all you need to have are Program Changes as needed. Any specialized Sysex required for the song will already have been sent to the synths before you pushed Play. The SysEx information posted on this thread from the Help files goes Way back. But I'm sure you'd already studied all that since you've spent days thoroughly exploring what's available in Sonar. And you already saw for yourself that the small macro dumps during a sequence weren't what you needed. Nostalgia - this thread has been nostalgic, taking me back to the days when all I used were hardware synths. I hadn't thought so much about those times in a long time before reading this thread. Here's one scenario I've remembered now which called for a full Sysex dump during the course of a sequence - The Yamaha FB-01. Remember that unit? 8 voice synth which was multi-timbral, but which didn't dynamically allocate the voices. You had to assign each instrument how many voices you wanted it to have - Bass, 1 note, Lead one note - etc. Well there were times when I wanted the entire configuration in FB-01 to change during the course of a song - I'd come to a point, for instance, where I needed all 8 of the synth's voices to be assigned to one instrument. The only way to do that would be to send out a complete re-configuration. Other synths would be carrying the music along while I sent out that data dump. But that was using a hardware sequencer, it was way before I had Cakewalk. All I had to do was enable Sysex recording, push record, and send the data dump from the synth to the sequencer. Now it's a different world, and I primarily use soft synths. On the rare occasions when I'll use one of my old hardware synths, Sonar's SysEx View serves me well. And if I'd need to change patch data during the course of a sequence - I'd do that in an instant via Program Change. I hope you get back to working with your music soon, Tom. It's been an interesting thread. I wish you the best. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 14:51:41
(permalink)
rbowser Oh well. In my own way, I was trying to be helpful. Even though it's usually true that it's nearly impossible to convince someone to try a different approach, I thought I'd try to encourage you to try the more usual way of doing what you need, Tom, since wrestling with this Sysex approach has obviously been so maddening for you. Speaking for myself, I didn't mean that what you're trying to do is the "wrong" way so much as the less efficient way. I think that would be difficult to disagree with, since in post after post you've been showing us how convoluted and laborious your approach is. And we've been trying to point out that all that hassle can be avoided with the simple, straight forward Patch Change approach. I doubt if what you're asking for would be a feature request that would be taken very seriously, but of course I could be wrong. The SysEx view is extremely helpful. Once your customized data is parked in there, it becomes part of your project, and any number of hardware synths can be quickly set the way you want when you open up the project. Nobody's been suggesting you shouldn't use that- it's the only efficient way to tie hardware synths into your projects. If you have custom patches for a project, those can also be in that Sysex dump, setting User Patches slots in your synths the way you need.Then during the course of the song, all you need to have are Program Changes as needed. Any specialized Sysex required for the song will already have been sent to the synths before you pushed Play. The SysEx information posted on this thread from the Help files goes Way back. But I'm sure you'd already studied all that since you've spent days thoroughly exploring what's available in Sonar. And you already saw for yourself that the small macro dumps during a sequence weren't what you needed. Nostalgia - this thread has been nostalgic, taking me back to the days when all I used were hardware synths. I hadn't thought so much about those times in a long time before reading this thread. Here's one scenario I've remembered now which called for a full Sysex dump during the course of a sequence - The Yamaha FB-01. Remember that unit? 8 voice synth which was multi-timbral, but which didn't dynamically allocate the voices. You had to assign each instrument how many voices you wanted it to have - Bass, 1 note, Lead one note - etc. Well there were times when I wanted the entire configuration in FB-01 to change during the course of a song - I'd come to a point, for instance, where I needed all 8 of the synth's voices to be assigned to one instrument. The only way to do that would be to send out a complete re-configuration. Other synths would be carrying the music along while I sent out that data dump. But that was using a hardware sequencer, it was way before I had Cakewalk. All I had to do was enable Sysex recording, push record, and send the data dump from the synth to the sequencer. Now it's a different world, and I primarily use soft synths. On the rare occasions when I'll use one of my old hardware synths, Sonar's SysEx View serves me well. And if I'd need to change patch data during the course of a sequence - I'd do that in an instant via Program Change. I hope you get back to working with your music soon, Tom. It's been an interesting thread. I wish you the best. Randy B. hello - i appreciate your statements :-) actually as i said many ways lead to rome - and maybe i just go a little irritated here because (truly) i never ever before had thoughth of my method as something "unusual" - thats why i continued to point out how esily this was to do with other apps...thats just my point - eventually if people here had also done this before they wouldnt have reacted so sceptically - thats why from the beginning i asked not to question my motvation (cos it inst founded in booze or madness ;-) ) but anywy - who wants to carry positive information out of this thraed can do so - o its all ok ... btw. the fb01 - lol - i hope you dont get offended if i say that i hated it ;-) this little greyish box that sounded like a mutilated dx7 ... best regards - and yeah - its time to make music i guess
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 17:32:45
(permalink)
"...btw. the fb01 - lol - i hope you dont get offended if i say that i hated it ;-) this little greyish box that sounded like a mutilated dx7..." hehe--I hear you, Tom. It was a pretty funky box. But at the time, I was happy to have its little 4 op FM sound available to layer in with my other synths. I appreciate your new post. Good luck with your projects, because Yes - it's time to make music! Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
NoKey
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 974
- Joined: 2008/10/28 15:30:19
- Status: offline
Re:why cant i get a realtime sysex dump into sonar???
2010/07/02 18:23:46
(permalink)
info@tomflair.com NoKey Hi Tom, I don't recall you posting this: "However, if you use the Sysx View (which can store up to 8,192 banks of SysEx messages), there is a way to 'embed' triggers for the SysEx banks in a track, and have them play back at any time." ,.... which the article above details, and explains how you can circumvent some limits. please nokey - i know you wanna help me :-) but this detail doesnt change the fact that the procedure itself is way to complicated ...its STILL the 12 steps i mentioned in the other thread (or at least step 7 to 12) - there is nothing to do about it..NO other approach - NO workaround THIS is the ONLY available routine to get a midi dump bigger than 255byte anywheer in a miditrack 1: open sysex-view 2: arm the recieving status 3: select the way how the signal transmission is activated 4: send dump from synth 5: confirm dump has been fully transmitted 6: remember the bank number (because names are not displayed later in the event insert !!!) 7: select a midiclip 8: open the event list 9: insert an event pressing "ins" 10 :choose eventtype 11: choose number of eventtype 12: specify the time of the event - because in contrary to the manuals claim the inserted event is NOT where the nowtime is allocated but at the end of the selcted clip... best regards Yes, I believe everybody tried to help you. And I still believe that the best help offered was to use banks and patch numbers, as your module allows, and Sonar allows, and is much quicker. But you did not seem to like that idea because you already had one choice made. That's beats anything anyone can offer; and my sincere wish is that it does not beat you.
|