kevo
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1038
- Joined: 2005/06/28 15:04:27
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 00:19:03
(permalink)
Mr. Lethargic Code Slinging Caveman who Whistles an Intelligent Tune!
|
candlesayshi
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 694
- Joined: 2008/02/01 00:00:55
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 04:41:11
(permalink)
bitflipper If his automation looks like neon spaghetti, I'd strongly suggest staying with 8.5. Why is that, if you don't mind me asking? I work with a lot of automation, and I actually quite like X1's method for working with it over 8.5's.
|
cliffr
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 539
- Joined: 2010/02/19 21:44:43
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 08:27:23
(permalink)
Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] Here's a video that outlines quite clearly some of the ways in which X1 is faster and more streamlined in its workflow than 8.5 SONAR X1. Easier To use. Thanks Brandon, I'd think that's quite informative for someone who hasn't tried X1, regardless of whether or not they already use 8.5 or earlier. I really like X1, and I'll probably be getting "expanded" when it's released. I did find the switch over to X1 from 8.5 took me a wee while, and it wasn't without some frustrating moments. It really is quite different to 8.5. So when you're working fast and you have to keep stopping to find the new way of doing something that you can normally hammer out with your eyes half closed, it's naturally frustrating and a bit of a head spinner. However ... it really didn't take too long before I got a good enough grasp to pretty much switch over completely, and now I have no inclination to use 8.5. I only ever touch 8.5 for old projects I did in 32bit, and because I still have one or maybe two special purpose plugs that either don't play well or don't work at all in a 64bit host. I haven't even installed the 32bit version of X1 yet, but I may do that soon so I can ditch using 8.5 all together. Sure, X1 isn't without it's kinks, but that will improve over time. The smart tools, new browser functions with drag'n'drop just about everything, screensets, inspector, edit filter, automation, PC channel strips etc. I think are all great improvements. I think my bottom line would be point them to this vid, and advise to try the demo and see for themselves. There seems to be a lot about X1 that some people love and others hate, for various reasons. Those who've become very profficient using 8.5 might really struggle, when you get to that point where you almost work on autopilot, it could well drive you bonkers trying to change over. I had a bit of that the first few weeks, but as far as I'm concerned, for me it was well worth the pain. Best advice I think is try the demo and make up your own mind. It's something you'll either like or you won't. Cheers - Cliff
i7-950 24 GB, GTX 580, W7/64 Ultimate, Sonar Platinum, Alesis MasterControl, KRK Rokit RP8g2s Some Real piano, basses, and guitars, Komplete 8Ultimate, Ibanez guitars, MusicLab RG/Strat/LPC, Trilian, Omnisphere, RMX, EWQL SO Platinum, Pianos, Choirs, VOP, Gypsy, Goliath, SD2, MOR, Ra, HS, HB, too many plugs, Midi controllers, and all kinds of weird gadgets My Soundclick Page
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 08:28:46
(permalink)
"Just as long you recognize the trollish crap here is simply some folks who just cannot seem to let it go. They have been wronged in their minds and they will make us remember it as long as they live. Very sad for the rest of us." This represents a very limited vision fueled with anger and an inability to consider another perspective. I personally feel that all the good features that we enjoyed in version 8.5, but are missing in X1, will be put back in to the Xseries. I look forward to the version when the number of visible track available in track view is restored so I can track live while watching all my tracks. I look forward to the version when I'll be able to use PRV snap to scale with drum maps as easily as I do in version 8.5. It's broken right now. I look forward to be able to read the entire name of parameters in text boxes as I could in version 8.5. I look forward to be able to actually change the colors using the color changing selectors within the program. The ones that work in version 8.5 but don't work in X1, even though they are there waiting to be fixed. I look forward to a lot of things that are going to make the X series usable. I do not understand the anger and close mindedness that presumes that I must accept the botch job in X1 as if it is the end of the line. It doesn't make sense to me that anyone would suppose that these changes were made... and that no further changes are possible. The thing I really don't understand is the insults, insinuations and assorted verbal violence that some of you guys seem to foster, embody and display when you disagree with someone. I try to ignore rude admonitions that I should accept that SONAR will never change again. SONAR can only get better from where it is at right now... and I should know, because I am SONAR's biggest fanboy!!! I encourage everyone to buy SONAR X1; Use it or just put in on the shelf. I encourage every SONAR X1 licensee to start asking Cakewalk to replace all the missing stuff that makes X1 less useful than version 8.5. good day sir, mike
post edited by mike_mccue - 2011/09/24 08:55:33
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 12:33:03
(permalink)
Why is that, if you don't mind me asking? I work with a lot of automation, and I actually quite like X1's method for working with it over 8.5's. I posted some pictures in this thread.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Compguy
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 67
- Joined: 2004/02/23 13:56:23
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 13:23:37
(permalink)
My gosh, there sure is a lot of fighting on this forum. I guess that's the Internet for ya, plus we're all creative types and probably somewhat sensitive. It's just tough to sift through the personal fighting to mine the gold. Anyway, there is indeed gold scattered about this thread. Thanks to all the guys who genuinely tried to be helpful. I was certain that the wording of my original question would elicit some very helpful and revealing responses. I'm going to try X1C later today. I'm positively cringing because I read in a post above that some labels are still cut off. Amateur to the nth degree. There is simply never an excuse for that (and other issues). I'm curious as to whether CW consulted with anyone other than their own software engineers in terms of UI design? Engineers and developers have extremely limited perspective in the ivory tower, or the war room, and input from the men in the trenches is VITAL to a useful and properly designed UI. The "darling" idea hatched in the minds of cloistered developers is often extremely sound and even ground-breaking, but that "darling" can rapidly turn into a sewn-together Frankenstein monster without input from those who are actually going to be using it. It is a fact of human nature... development of a UI without input from users will invariably yield an awkward, sometimes amazingly brilliant and sometimes appallingly bad UI. That seems to be the case here. Shear brilliance coexisting with amateurness. One result, of course, is the key users (members of this forum) who have to struggle and strain to adapt to it (psychologically, I mean), all the while carrying an internal grudge which they cannot help and which is justified toward the company. I believe that most of those here who still express frustration have genuinely tried to adapt to it and be forgiving. Others have been able to do that, but from reading all these threads I can understand why the frustration level is so high. I would bet that every one of them yearns to be able to say, "This may not be perfect but it's certainly very good for a redesign". When people spend good money on a product they are highly motivated to justify their purchase and less motivated to complain and condemn. The expression of that frustration becomes tiring to those of you who have adapted, and understandably so, but I think it's good feedback for the company. If they're smart, they've been saying to themselves, "Oops, we need to change our modus operandi in the future". If not, then the market will eventually deliver a corrective blow as once-loyal customers defect to the companies who display respect to their clientele. Ok, I'm off to try it out again, and once again I'm going to do my d*mnedest to be open-minded and tolerant of remaining issues. I want to give them a fair shot. Flame-suit zipped up and in crouch position.
|
candlesayshi
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 694
- Joined: 2008/02/01 00:00:55
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 15:27:27
(permalink)
bitflipper Why is that, if you don't mind me asking? I work with a lot of automation, and I actually quite like X1's method for working with it over 8.5's. I posted some pictures in this thread. Ah, gotcha.
|
Joe_A
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 458
- Joined: 2008/07/06 23:16:14
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 16:11:25
(permalink)
I hope you take this as it's intended, just a friendly comment....it doesn't appear like you have any real enthusiasm to install X1, so hold off a bit. I don't presume to be telling you anything new....often it's better not to make any changes when so many doubts are in the forefront. It's like buying a guitar.......if I'm worrying too much about bad things that could happen after I've buy it (or anything else), I don't buy it. I wait until doubts dwindle and are replaced by enthusiasm. Doubts don't have to be gone, just in their proper place. My own comments are; I've been using X1 and have found it a good investment of time and money. Either install X1, or don't. Best Regards,
jambrose@cfl.rr.com Sonar Plat. Lifetime. Started in Sonar 4, each through 8.5.3PE. Scarlett 18i202nd gen., Edirol FA-101, M-Audio Firewire 410, AMD Phenom II 1045T six core processor, 8GB DDR3, AMD Radeon HD 6450, dual displays, 1.5 TB SATA HD, USB 2, Firewire 1394A, 1394B, 18/22 mixer, EV Q-66, Yamaha HS50M monitors, few guitars, Fender Cybertwin SE, Fender Cyber foot controller, Boss RC20-XL, misc pedals, etc. Win Home Prem 64 bit.
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 18:42:56
(permalink)
It would be nice if there would be a little space for those who like what they are seeing/doing within this DAW but would like to see improvements along the way.... And would like not to be dumped into the realm of either "Fanboi" or "Basher" .
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
mikey
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 404
- Joined: 2003/11/06 21:52:49
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/24 23:21:35
(permalink)
" I'd say that he shouldn't worry about stability, that X1 is no buggier than 8.5. " Bit, Id say thats biased toward those who have little issues using X1. There is another side here ; ). Id say it depends on what you have and how you set it up. Id tell them that there seems to be just as many with at least a few problems here using X1, as there are without problems using X1. That I have reverted back to 8.5 and have had alot better luck and fewer issues, but that does not mean you will have problems or issues with X1. It means rolling the dice to find out if it will really work for you (and that is the real problem, isnt it ) ?
post edited by mikey - 2011/09/24 23:28:24
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/25 11:24:07
(permalink)
mikey " I'd say that he shouldn't worry about stability, that X1 is no buggier than 8.5. " Bit, Id say thats biased toward those who have little issues using X1. There is another side here ; ). Id say it depends on what you have and how you set it up. Id tell them that there seems to be just as many with at least a few problems here using X1, as there are without problems using X1. That I have reverted back to 8.5 and have had alot better luck and fewer issues, but that does not mean you will have problems or issues with X1. It means rolling the dice to find out if it will really work for you (and that is the real problem, isnt it ) ? I wouldn't choose between 8.5 and X1 based on stability alone. 8.5 still suffers from bugs -- some of which are extremely annoying to me -- and they will never be fixed. (On the other hand, there is definitely some benefit to coping with the bugs you know about versus bugs you haven't met yet.) At this juncture, rumors of X1's instability are greatly exaggerated, if not largely unfounded. Sure, bugs exist. But users are too quick to assume that a bug in the DAW explains some particular problem they're experiencing, while not considering other factors (such as using free plugins of dubious provenance). You might read into this that I am a (perhaps reluctant) X1 adopter, but I am not. I used it for a few projects just to gain familiarity, then went back to 8.5.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
shawn@trustmedia.tv
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2136
- Joined: 2008/12/06 09:41:18
- Location: Hastings, MN
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/25 12:04:14
(permalink)
Studio SONAR X3. Axiom 25 midi controller, DUNE 2, Producer Content, Good Times, Bandlab Mojo
|
JClosed
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 690
- Joined: 2009/12/19 11:50:26
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/25 12:06:18
(permalink)
Just like others said here, switching to X1 is a personal choice. Sonar is a complex program wit a lot of "parts" that are used by almost every user differently. It is fully possible the one user uses X1 in a way that it works perfectly and fits like a glove, while another user has nothing but struggles to make everything works like he/she/it wants to. So - recommending X1 is not that simple. I am a person that can say the X1 interface is a relieve compared to the crammed "old" 8.5 interface. At the other hand, as we can read here, there are a bunch of people that do in no way share this view. If you ask me if would recommend the upgrade to X1 just based on the above, I would certainly say "yes". At the other hand - if you ask the people that do not like X1 or have trouble with their kind of workflow and/or needs, the answer would probably be "No". The best answer to give is "download the demo and give it a run". If you like X1 and it "clicks" with you (just like it did with me), by all means pay that small amount of money for a full upgrade. If you do not like X1 at all, even that small amount of money is probably to much. Bottom line - only the person that has to or want to work with X1 on a daily base can answer the question for him/her/it self. There is just no general advise to give because it is all a question of personal taste and need...
|
oxrabidus
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 132
- Joined: 2009/09/18 15:40:27
- Status: offline
Re:Bottom Line It - Why should an 8.5 user switch to X1?
2011/09/25 13:06:55
(permalink)
my only problem with x1 is that everything is so much bigger than 8.5. i liked the smaller buttons and smaller fonts. i guess there are somepeople that like to do as much as possible on one screen. plus to me smaller looks cleaner sometimes. but thats really the only thing i dont like. ive had only one crash since istalled it, and it loads the first project really slowly, but when i close it and open another one or the same one again it opens quick, seems like it takes a bit to wake up i guess...
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, Focusrite Scarlett2i2
|