Helpful ReplyControl Surfaces for Sonar

Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Author
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 10:20:02 (permalink)
chuckebaby
BuleriaChk
chuckebaby
I use a Mackie MCU that is about 10 years old in Sonar and it works perfect.
Ive used ACT to set up my M Audio Oxygen 49 and had no problem with it.
I don't see the point in your rant.


  
(I'm not about to buy an Oxygen to find out.... you were lucky. And maybe a bit limited in versatility.. )
Did the Oxygen use a Mackie template? 


It's not about luck my friend.
Sonar has a preset in ACT for the Oxygen. it took about a whole 30 seconds to set up.
There is a ton of presets built in to Sonar for use with ACT. Making it simple to set up most Control surfaces.
Would I like to see Sonar expand on Control surface set ups ? Sure.
But I would like a lot of other features too.
 
We all work differently so its tough to categorize Sonars List of "Thing that need improvement".
More often than not, that list is made up of personal needs (what I want / what you want).
Some would argue Staff view improvements should come before Control surface improvements.
See what I mean ? What ever the case, I wish you well.




Now, that's interesting.  Where are these ACT presets (e.g. Oxygen 49)?  If I look under "control surfaces" in Sonar, I don't see anything except older surfaces, and the only one relevant to me is "Mackie" (which usually gets hung up on "connecting", although it does recognize that the interface exists... or doesn't work at all.  My system is working with every other known software package under the sun... Live, Maschine, Fruity Loops.. etc...
 
I went into Program Files/Cakewalk/shared surfaces and saw only the limited ones appearing in the drop-down..

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#31
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3297
  • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 10:56:45 (permalink)
BuleriaChk
Now, that's interesting.  Where are these ACT presets (e.g. Oxygen 49)?

The right place to look for an "ACT preset" is in "ACT plug-in", in this case in "Cakewalk ACT MIDI".

  If I look under "control surfaces" in Sonar,

 you can not find it there. It is "a preset", not a plug-in.

I don't see anything except older surfaces, and the only one relevant to me is "Mackie" (which usually gets hung up on "connecting", although it does recognize that the interface exists... or doesn't work at all.  My system is working with every other known software package under the sun... Live, Maschine, Fruity Loops.. etc...

That I have already explained before.
 

Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
#32
thedukewestern
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 387
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 12:06:59
  • Location: NY
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 11:26:27 (permalink)
I grabbed an older mcu pro and it worked only sporadically, tried all of the solutions listed here.  After a month, one of the faders, which was string based, broke ... and 1 channel just didnt work anymore, and I sold it at a loss of 375$.  After hours of frustration and a 375$ loss, I gave up for now...

Be the first one who thinks that you can
 
Sonar Platinum, Windows 7 64 bit - clean install January 2016, Focusrite Pro 40, Outboard Pres, Native Instruments Komplete, Izotope, PSP, Melodyne, Vegetarian
#33
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 12:42:18 (permalink)
azslow3
BuleriaChk
Now, that's interesting.  Where are these ACT presets (e.g. Oxygen 49)?

The right place to look for an "ACT preset" is in "ACT plug-in", in this case in "Cakewalk ACT MIDI".

 
Ok, I give up.  If it is the factory presets dropdown, none of that works for crap, as mentioned before.  I am not about to program yet another fricken' controller with Midi Learn, which is a really dumb solution to the problem.  IMO, of course, YMMV. 
 
Other wise, where is a different "Cakewalk ACT MIDI" (I searched my computer). 
Is it a factory folder, or something you developed?
How do I get to it? (I have Sonar Platinum open in front of me...)
And once I get it, what do I do with it?
(I'm using Win10 Pro x64)
 
I'm not familiar with your products, although I did look at your site, but didn't find any useful plugins there for my purposes... but I applaud your efforts (Like Stray at NativeKontrol)
 
Why is this so fricken' hard in almost 2017 with Sonar and nobody else?
post edited by BuleriaChk - 2016/11/25 13:18:02

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#34
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3297
  • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 13:25:28 (permalink)
BuleriaChk
azslow3
BuleriaChk
Now, that's interesting.  Where are these ACT presets (e.g. Oxygen 49)?

The right place to look for an "ACT preset" is in "ACT plug-in", in this case in "Cakewalk ACT MIDI".

Ok, I give up.  Where is "Cakewalk ACT MIDI" (I searched my computer).  Is it a folder, or something you developed?
How do I get to it? (I have Sonar Platinum open in front of me...)

If you open Sonar / Preferences / MIDI / Control Surfaces, you can add "ACT MIDI Controller".
If you open its interface (Sonar / Utilities  / ACT MIDI Controller - 1), you can select some "Presets" (left top corner, as with any plug-in in Sonar).
 
If there is no preset for your device, you can open Sonar Reference Guide (big 2000+ pages PDF), chapter 40. Read it carefully. And with a bit of luck and under 30 minutes time, you can get working basic configuration for (almost) any device.
 
If you want to understand how it works, you can spend a bit more time reading: http://www.azslow.com/index.php/topic,107.0.html
If you do not (want to) understand Russian humor, please start to read AFTER the smile in the first post. Some people have problems with the thread title and the text at the beginning, I do not understand why...
 

I'm not familiar with your products, although I did look at your site, but didn't find any useful plugins there for my purposes... but I applaud your efforts (Like Stray at NativeKontrol)

If you mean www.nativekontrol.com , that really looks interesting. I have not visited it before.
 
My "products" are all free. Potentially useful plug-ins:
1) AZ Controller. For any control surface, using it you theoretically can do anything practically possible in Sonar, but that takes time. On the top of the site you can find a link to YouTube channel and check "Startup preset". The result is as basic as "Cakewalk ACT MIDI", but you can define any number of control (not just 8+8+8) and you can extend/tune that result when you have time and wish. Also you can check "Presets" board, some users have configured devices themselves of with my help. Check what BCR2000 can do, as an example.
2) MIDI Velocity. In case you want modify midi response curve.
3) AZ Lua, if you are Lua programmer and want to do something fancy with MIDI in Sonar, or just want to try one of the example presets for it.
 
All "products" take not a lot of space, uninstall clearly, have no adds and they are not calling home.
 
But for YOU, I have already posted the link in my first reply. That is modified MackieControl.dll (you already know where to place it....), Open Source, produced from CW Open Source. This modified version has one extra configuration parameter. After you set it, your "mackie compatible" devices will start to work (you will no longer see "Connecting...").

Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
#35
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3297
  • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 13:33:05 (permalink)
BuleriaChk
Ok, I give up.  If it is the factory presets dropdown, none of that works for crap, as mentioned before.  I am not about to program yet another fricken' controller with Midi Learn, which is a really dumb solution to the problem.  IMO, of course, YMMV. 

MIDI Learning controls in some plug-in is not "programming", it takes just several minutes (unlike programming).
 
If you describe "the problem" in more details, may be I can give move precise answer. If that is still making "mackie mode" work with Sonar, I have already answered. If you want make "super Sonar controller" out of your Mashine, that is also possible. But that will be your TIME investment (much smaller then my, you will just have to think what you want and test either I have managed to implement that correctly). But there are some limits what a controller can do with Sonar, and I can not move them.

Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
#36
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4665
  • Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 13:33:30 (permalink)
I have an FW-1884 that I'm selling for ***** on fleabay.  It works flawlessly in Windows 10 and SPLAT.  It has HUI, Mackie and native emulations.  I think the rules say I can't put the price.
post edited by eph221 - 2016/11/25 13:57:46
#37
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3249
  • Joined: 2015/01/17 03:52:50
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 13:49:21 (permalink)
one or two?

just a sec

#38
abacab
Max Output Level: -30.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4464
  • Joined: 2014/12/31 19:34:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 13:51:19 (permalink)
chuckebaby
 
It's not about luck my friend.
Sonar has a preset in ACT for the Oxygen. it took about a whole 30 seconds to set up.
There is a ton of presets built in to Sonar for use with ACT. Making it simple to set up most Control surfaces.
Would I like to see Sonar expand on Control surface set ups ? Sure.
But I would like a lot of other features too.




Hey chuck, thanks!  It was lucky for me that I read this ...
 
I have an old M-Audio Axiom 49 1st gen, that I could never get set up correctly with ACT in Sonar.  But on a whim I just tried your Oxygen 49 selection.
 
Guess what? The Axiom 49 transport controls and faders are now correctly mapped!  I had tried every Axiom choice in the list and it was always hit or miss.  So I ended up getting a Roland A300-PRO.  But I still like the Axiom keys.
 
I'm not going to question why this works, but I'm digging it now
 
 

DAW: CbB; Sonar Platinum, and others ... 
#39
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3297
  • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 14:14:29 (permalink)
abacab
I have an old M-Audio Axiom 49 1st gen, that I could never get set up correctly with ACT in Sonar.  But on a whim I just tried your Oxygen 49 selection.
 
Guess what? The Axiom 49 transport controls and faders are now correctly mapped!  I had tried every Axiom choice in the list and it was always hit or miss.  So I ended up getting a Roland A300-PRO.  But I still like the Axiom keys.

If someone, ever is able to explain me why 25 mouse click (exactly 25!) can be a "brick wall" for people which are working with DAWs, I will be happy...

Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
#40
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 16:28:26 (permalink)
azslow3
BuleriaChk
azslow3
BuleriaChk
Now, that's interesting.  Where are these ACT presets (e.g. Oxygen 49)?

The right place to look for an "ACT preset" is in "ACT plug-in", in this case in "Cakewalk ACT MIDI".

Ok, I give up.  Where is "Cakewalk ACT MIDI" (I searched my computer).  Is it a folder, or something you developed?
How do I get to it? (I have Sonar Platinum open in front of me...)

If you open Sonar / Preferences / MIDI / Control Surfaces, you can add "ACT MIDI Controller".
If you open its interface (Sonar / Utilities  / ACT MIDI Controller - 1), you can select some "Presets" (left top corner, as with any plug-in in Sonar).
 
If there is no preset for your device, you can open Sonar Reference Guide (big 2000+ pages PDF), chapter 40. Read it carefully. And with a bit of luck and under 30 minutes time, you can get working basic configuration for (almost) any device.
 
If you want to understand how it works, you can spend a bit more time reading: http://www.azslow.com/index.php/topic,107.0.html
If you do not (want to) understand Russian humor, please start to read AFTER the smile in the first post. Some people have problems with the thread title and the text at the beginning, I do not understand why...
 

I'm not familiar with your products, although I did look at your site, but didn't find any useful plugins there for my purposes... but I applaud your efforts (Like Stray at NativeKontrol)

If you mean www.nativekontrol.com , that really looks interesting. I have not visited it before.
 
My "products" are all free. Potentially useful plug-ins:
1) AZ Controller. For any control surface, using it you theoretically can do anything practically possible in Sonar, but that takes time. On the top of the site you can find a link to YouTube channel and check "Startup preset". The result is as basic as "Cakewalk ACT MIDI", but you can define any number of control (not just 8+8+8) and you can extend/tune that result when you have time and wish. Also you can check "Presets" board, some users have configured devices themselves of with my help. Check what BCR2000 can do, as an example.
2) MIDI Velocity. In case you want modify midi response curve.
3) AZ Lua, if you are Lua programmer and want to do something fancy with MIDI in Sonar, or just want to try one of the example presets for it.
 
All "products" take not a lot of space, uninstall clearly, have no adds and they are not calling home.
 
But for YOU, I have already posted the link in my first reply. That is modified MackieControl.dll (you already know where to place it....), Open Source, produced from CW Open Source. This modified version has one extra configuration parameter. After you set it, your "mackie compatible" devices will start to work (you will no longer see "Connecting...").



Thanks much for the info; I understand now.  I will try your "Mackie Control.dll" and see if it works (I would LOVE to be able to use my Maschine Studio or Jam as a control surface for Sonar).  I won't even open the package from Amazon for the Studio until I've tried it.
 
I much appreciate your efforts to correct the problems with Sonar.  Stray at NativeKontrol is a genius; his work with Clyphx and Live is extremely useful (and free as well), and Arsenal is just great for integrating Lauchpad Pro with Live the way it should have been done in the first place.  I also have the Arsenal Akai APC Mini version, which works great as well (for some reason, Akai left out Session Overview in their factor implementation, which was the dumbest marketing decision ever).. All of Stray's products are just marvelous.  Isotonik studios also produces some great interface scripts/programs for Live, but oriented towards (really, really, really serious :) Dj's and/or control freaks.  And there is also Mots' superb Launchpad95 (and Pro) which has opened up a lot of doors for everyone.

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#41
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 16:39:30 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby RSMCGUITAR 2016/11/26 19:48:57
abacab
chuckebaby
 
It's not about luck my friend.
Sonar has a preset in ACT for the Oxygen. it took about a whole 30 seconds to set up.
There is a ton of presets built in to Sonar for use with ACT. Making it simple to set up most Control surfaces.
Would I like to see Sonar expand on Control surface set ups ? Sure.
But I would like a lot of other features too.




Hey chuck, thanks!  It was lucky for me that I read this ...
 
I have an old M-Audio Axiom 49 1st gen, that I could never get set up correctly with ACT in Sonar.  But on a whim I just tried your Oxygen 49 selection.
 
Guess what? The Axiom 49 transport controls and faders are now correctly mapped!  I had tried every Axiom choice in the list and it was always hit or miss.  So I ended up getting a Roland A300-PRO.  But I still like the Axiom keys.
 
I'm not going to question why this works, but I'm digging it now
 
 


Thanks man ;-)


I saw this a few years back

It worked flawlessly.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#42
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 16:44:26 (permalink)
thedukewestern
I grabbed an older mcu pro and it worked only sporadically, tried all of the solutions listed here.  After a month, one of the faders, which was string based, broke ... and 1 channel just didnt work anymore, and I sold it at a loss of 375$.  After hours of frustration and a 375$ loss, I gave up for now...


Sorry to hear this. Sounds like you got a crap unit.
I bought mine used on Craigslist for 175.00 USA dollars. the guy wanted 200.00 and im crazy to even dare to ask him to take 175.00 but he did. best purchase I ever made (Studio equipment wise).
everything works awesome. I can control the Pro Channel, Sends, Channel faders are indeed motorized (All mine work, sorry) but it is just an amazing unit. it was easy to set up. a midi in / a midi out.
I also have 2 pedals hooked up to it for punch in recording and play start.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#43
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 17:13:05 (permalink)
To share my experiences...  I had a hell of a time finding the actual MackieControl.dll file on your site for some reason (I already had the C++ file from long ago)
 
Ok, so I downloaded the MackieControl.dll and the .ini file from your site, renamed the originals in C:/Program Files/Cakewalk/Shared Surfaces to 0xxx.dll and place the downloaded files in that directory.
 
Still stuck ok ...connecting.  Should the files be elsewhere, and if so, where?  Do I still have to edit the .ini file?
(Windows renamed the .ini file to .htm)
 
Reboot necessary?
 
Sheesh!

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#44
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 17:13:16 (permalink)
To share my experiences...  I had a hell of a time finding the actual MackieControl.dll file on your site for some reason (I already had the C++ file from long ago)  But thanks much, I think I finally got it working (sort of, but more or less following NI's template.)
 
Ok, so I downloaded the MackieControl.dll and the .ini file from your site, renamed the originals in C:/Program Files/Cakewalk/Shared Surfaces to 0xxx.dll and place the downloaded files in that directory.
 
Lots of issues, but at least the template connects now, and some stuff works.  Painfully, I'm not going to use Maschine Studio as an interface.  I'll try Jam next, and see how that goes...
post edited by BuleriaChk - 2016/11/25 18:10:59

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#45
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 18:30:44 (permalink)
Update:  Well both Maschine Studio and Jam will control Sonar in Mackie mode, but like a dog standing on its hind legs; it is never done well, but one is surprised it is done at all.
 
Bottom Line: if the nanoKontrol Studio doesn't work, Ill give nanoKontrol 2 a shot.  If THAT doesn't work I'll either purchase a Mackie (appox $900) or go back to using my mouse. But the Maschine implementation of Mackie sucks - their implementation of Live is just great.  I personally don't need a knob for everything  (I don't mind using a mouse for tweaking, but the bread and butter stuff - fader volume, mute, solo, pan, etc. is much better in hardware), but Maschine NKS has that covered, especially with the Arturia collections as well as all their own stuff - which is enormous.  And all of what I've tried from NI so far has worked very well (at least recently, there were teething issues, of course)
 
I'll report back here about the nanoKontrol Studio...

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#46
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 18:59:38 (permalink)
BuleriaChk
Update:  Well both Maschine Studio and Jam will control Sonar in Mackie mode, but like a dog standing on its hind legs; it is never done well, but one is surprised it is done at all.
 
Bottom Line: if the nanoKontrol Studio doesn't work, Ill give nanoKontrol 2 a shot.  If THAT doesn't work I'll either purchase a Mackie (appox $900) or go back to using my mouse. But the Maschine implementation of Mackie sucks - their implementation of Live is just great.  I personally don't need a knob for everything  (I don't mind using a mouse for tweaking, but the bread and butter stuff - fader volume, mute, solo, pan, etc. is much better in hardware), but Maschine NKS has that covered, especially with the Arturia collections as well as all their own stuff - which is enormous.  And all of what I've tried from NI so far has worked very well (at least recently, there were teething issues, of course)
 
I'll report back here about the nanoKontrol Studio...


you are right, you don't need a knob for everything, matter of fact I use my mouse for assignments I already have buttons for. you know how it is, sometimes a mouse is easier. so good point.
What kind of PC do you have ? (CPU, exc)

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#47
abacab
Max Output Level: -30.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4464
  • Joined: 2014/12/31 19:34:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 19:00:50 (permalink)
azslow3
abacab
I have an old M-Audio Axiom 49 1st gen, that I could never get set up correctly with ACT in Sonar.  But on a whim I just tried your Oxygen 49 selection.
 
Guess what? The Axiom 49 transport controls and faders are now correctly mapped!  I had tried every Axiom choice in the list and it was always hit or miss.  So I ended up getting a Roland A300-PRO.  But I still like the Axiom keys.

If someone, ever is able to explain me why 25 mouse click (exactly 25!) can be a "brick wall" for people which are working with DAWs, I will be happy...




Well it actually only took me 3 clicks.  After all these years.  Yikes!
 
Selected Preset 17 in the M-audio Axiom controller 1st gen (unassigned MIDI controllers).
 
Sonar Utilities > ACT MIDI Controller 1 > [click Preset down arrow, select M-Audio Oxygen 49]
 
Boom!  Done!
 
All faders & rotary knobs for channel strip parameters (volume & pan), and transport controls mapped correctly.  No Learning necessary.
 
It's weird because the ACT profiles for the Axiom never worked correctly with the transport controls before.  Still don't.  The only thing that worked were the faders and knobs.  Only thing I can assume since there were at least 3 versions of Axiom, 1st gen, 2nd gen, and Pro, that the devs must have confused some of the button mappings.

DAW: CbB; Sonar Platinum, and others ... 
#48
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 19:47:15 (permalink)
I think I'm going to return the nanoKontrol unopened and think some more.  Maybe a faderport or just bite the bullet and get an mcu.... or a faderport 8

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#49
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 21:24:00 (permalink)
BuleriaChk
I think I'm going to return the nanoKontrol unopened and think some more.  Maybe a faderport or just bite the bullet and get an mcu.... or a faderport 8


No doubt I got very lucky with mine (only 175.00 used) but if you can afford to wait it out a bit, I see the MCU consoles on Craigslist often. sometimes sellers are unreasonable and over price them. (there is one in my area now for 1000.00 used way over priced) but you might get lucky.
 
If its a some faders and knobs you need, an M audio Oxygen like mine was only 130.00
and it gets things done. at one point I coupled the Oxygen with a Cakewalk VS20 and had 16 faders and 8 knobs / Transport controls, exc. The VS20's go for about 120 now used. They are also an ASIO complaint devise with very transparent Mic inputs / Phantom power, exc.
These inputs come in handy when you want to use another set of Mic pres from, for example: a Mackie Mixing board.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#50
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/25 21:33:22 (permalink)
Actually, I got really lucky.  I thought I had lost my Frontier Tranzport dongle forever in a move last year, and even thrown the Tranzport away.  Lo and behold, I found the Tranzport and even the dongle.  After replacing the long dead batteries, it works like a charm in Sonar, and is exactly what I need right now....  (once I get good takes in Sonar, I'll just port the audio track over to Live and mix there....)
 
So - I'm ok for now, turns out.  The nanoStudio (and the Jam) are going back tomorrow - the Jam is nice, but very redundant for my Studio, and any clip I use in Maschine I'll just drag into Live for performance.  A day of panic, and I learned, uh, a lot of stuff I think I needed to know... :)
 
But the mcu sure looks nice... :)
 
Thanks to all,
 
Chuck

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#51
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3297
  • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 03:09:55 (permalink)
BuleriaChk
To share my experiences...  I had a hell of a time finding the actual MackieControl.dll file on your site for some reason (I already had the C++ file from long ago)  But thanks much, I think I finally got it working (sort of, but more or less following NI's template.)

Hm... the thread I have mentioned: http://forum.cakewalk.com/Mackie-Control-support-improvements-m3311275.aspx
Has direct link to binary, just under x86 / x64 dependent on what is needed, and direct link to INI file. On my site you can not find any MackieControl.dll at all, it is on github. Sorry, but I do not know why you have spent a hell of time.
 
BuleriaChk
But the mcu sure looks nice... :)

It works throw the same plug-in, with all related +-. You can check what you get with it using emulation apps for iPad or Android tablets. F.e. $5 for Android http://www.humatic.de/htools/touchdaw/.
 
BuleriaChk
Update:  Well both Maschine Studio and Jam will control Sonar in Mackie mode, but like a dog standing on its hind legs; it is never done well, but one is surprised it is done at all.

That is what I wrote at the very beginning: these devices are not Mackie. The mode exists just so something is working. In ANY DAW.
 
The "perfect integration" between a controller and a DAW should be done EXPLICITLY. No one has done for Mashine so far. I have also notices that Mashine owners are most impatient surface owners in this forum... probably the way the music is created has the influence. For me, learning some new peace of music on Piano takes WAY MORE time then configuring a surface.
 
You do not want spend your time for that (while you have and like the device), NI does not want to spend time for that (while they are PAYED). Why you think Cake should do this, if they do not use it and the do not get a single cent for that device?
 
chuckebaby
BuleriaChk
I think I'm going to return the nanoKontrol unopened and think some more.  Maybe a faderport or just bite the bullet and get an mcu.... or a faderport 8

 The VS20's go for about 120 now used. They are also an ASIO complaint devise with very transparent Mic inputs / Phantom power, exc.

VS20 is more like 60 and has only one Mic input... Also it has no Windows 10 drivers (based on posts, BuleriaChk will be unable to install it using )
 
With Faderport 8 Sonar support is not yet clear. They have written special plug-in for one channel Faderport, but they will need to write a different plug-in for 8 channel version.
 
If it is going to work throw MackieControl, the experience will be as frustrating as for Machine: Faderport 8 has no strip encoders and it has much less buttons then MCU.
 
If you are for 8 channel Mackie controller (I repeat, check with an app that functionality is ok for you), X-Touch can be a good choice (it has ALL required controls and it has implemented complete Mackie protocol). Not "real" Mackie hardware, but for a half of the price...
 
 
 

Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
#52
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 09:37:09 (permalink)
Well, we'll see.  Right now my emphasis is on getting a good take on one channel (real Flamenco is difficult!), so the Tranzport will do just fine.  (I may not return the nanoKontrol if it actually works.)
 
I agree with you the sense that Cakewalk is really designed more for a professional audio studio (for real musicians playing real instruments) then for the squeak, blurk crowd with 4 on the floor and the Amen break...:)  As a guitarist, I love Live and NI because they give instant ability to create backing tracks - NI for its incredible sound libraries, and Ableton for its flawless manipulation of real-time audio stretching, and many overlapping functions...
 
But my living room is already filled with stuff, and the last thing  I needed was another large controller like the mcu (although if I do send the nanoStudio back, I will probably get one, but it is way overkill for what I need, since I am really not a producer, just a guitarist trying to created some credible Flamenco instruction tracks.... (I already did that, but the last time it was physically cutting and splicing tape on reel-reel recorders...)
 
So for me, the unique thing about Sonar is comping; and I'm still not altogether sure it will work any better than other methods (requiring cutting and pasting audio, which is doable, and a lot better than cutting tape...:)
 
I appreciate Cakewalk, but they have really needed something like the nanoKontrol for a long time (I do like access to at least 4 tracks at the same time, so Tranzport is limited in that way.)
 
Well, that is it for me; thanks for helping me catch up on control surface status in Sonar and the help with deciding not to go with Mackie for now.  And Live and NI (as vst) is a wonderful combination for most things - it is Cakewalk that has the handle on audio production (imo); I myself don't need Melodyne, but I'm sure it is very, very useful for many.... :)
 
Maybe by the time I check in again (if I'm still around), someone will have tested the Faderport 8 with Sonar... :)

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#53
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8124
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:43:11
  • Location: Missouri - USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 10:41:14 (permalink)
chuckebaby
BuleriaChk
Update:  Well both Maschine Studio and Jam will control Sonar in Mackie mode, but like a dog standing on its hind legs; it is never done well, but one is surprised it is done at all.
 
Bottom Line: if the nanoKontrol Studio doesn't work, Ill give nanoKontrol 2 a shot.  If THAT doesn't work I'll either purchase a Mackie (appox $900) or go back to using my mouse. But the Maschine implementation of Mackie sucks - their implementation of Live is just great.  I personally don't need a knob for everything  (I don't mind using a mouse for tweaking, but the bread and butter stuff - fader volume, mute, solo, pan, etc. is much better in hardware), but Maschine NKS has that covered, especially with the Arturia collections as well as all their own stuff - which is enormous.  And all of what I've tried from NI so far has worked very well (at least recently, there were teething issues, of course)
 
I'll report back here about the nanoKontrol Studio...


you are right, you don't need a knob for everything, matter of fact I use my mouse for assignments I already have buttons for. you know how it is, sometimes a mouse is easier. so good point.
What kind of PC do you have ? (CPU, exc)




Yeah, my CS use has evolved considerably.  I've finally reached nirvana with qwerty/mouse + G49 + FaderPort.  I use whichever is handiest at the moment, rather than placing a 'never use the mouse' constraint on myself.
 
When I'm tracking keys, the G49 controls are the easiest.  When I'm tracking guitar, the FaderPort is the easiest.  When I'm mixing or setting up, the qwerty + mouse are the quickest.

Bob  --
Angels are crying because truth has died ...
Illegitimi non carborundum
--
Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64
Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s 
Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U

#54
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 10:48:54 (permalink)
Thought I would add, The most used tool that I utilize on my control surface is the "Shuttle/Jog wheel".
If you can find yourself something with that feature, it will make life incredibly easy in the DAW world.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#55
BuleriaChk
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 153
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:23:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 11:14:22 (permalink)
I just thought I'd announce that I just received an email this morning that says Softube Console 1 has announced a major update, and you can now control pan and fader volume ON THE SELECTED TRACK from that device in Sonar... :)  Wowie!
 
https://www.amazon.com/Softube-Console-Digital-Audio-Mixer/dp/B00H98MRRK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1480177323&sr=8-1&keywords=console+1
 
Still, for my small studio, if the nanoKontrol doesn't work out, it looks like it might be a viable (and much smaller) alternative to the mcu for my desktop..
 
Sheesh! If the nanoKontrol will do that for $149 I'll be a happy camper... :)
The NK even has a jog wheel..  (although it doesn't do markers in Sonar for some reason..)
 
Update: the more I look at Console 1, the more I like it, especially because it will operate as a VST in Live, Maschine, Fruity Loops, etc.  and especially Sonar, where I think you can switch modes back and forth to control the basic functions in Sonar.  This may well be worth the hit for me, it looks promising.
 
Any of you have any thoughts on the Console 1 (especially with its new capability vis a vis Sonar?
 
(I remember now why I wasn't interested when it first came out; it was $1500 at the time.  Now it is $649, so it is doable for me.
The more I look at it, the more I like it. 
 
Update: I've been watching the videos on the Console 1, and it just occurred to me that it doesn't have transport controls, which is another reason I didn't purchase it way back when ...
So for me, I can do the raw recording in Sonar, switch the audio clips to Live or Maschine, which have all those modules (shape, EQ, etc.) mapped to controls in Maschine Studio and Push 2, so console 1 is nice but not necessary (although the layout as a channel strip is very nice indeed.)  And Maschine works flawlessly as a vst within Live.
 
(I'm wondering if it is worth investigating ReWire between Sonar and Live.  Has anyone had experience with that?)
 
That convenience may be worth it, though, since I don't have much experience, and an easy layout like that would save me time as I was learning...)
post edited by BuleriaChk - 2016/11/26 13:01:05

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
http://www.FlamencoChuck.com
 "Compas Analysis", "A Flamenco Journey", "Music Theory for Flamenco", Other Resources
#56
lgmab
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 93
  • Joined: 2015/07/06 14:24:02
  • Location: Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 12:36:48 (permalink)
Hello All,
I am currently using Sonar Platinum and experience several crashes when using a Mackie MCU Pro + XT +C4 setup.
Does anyone know if the AZSlow plugin works? Also, what is the most reliable plugin for the Mackie MCU?
Thanks in advance!
 

Sonar Platinum
HP Envy Laptop 16GB RAM i7-4710 Windows 10
Motu 16A
Sweat and Tears with occasional profanities!
 
 
 
#57
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3297
  • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 15:34:55 (permalink)
(I have answered in my forum also)
My AZ Controller plug-in will not work in your case (XT+C4).
If you are going to setup my mod, you need the "original" installed first. Otherwise you will need to register it manually.
 
The most reliable plug-in is the original. My mod for it is the second option. And there is no any other options so far

Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
#58
lgmab
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 93
  • Joined: 2015/07/06 14:24:02
  • Location: Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 15:45:30 (permalink)
Thank you kindly AZslow,
I do have the original but cannot change any plugin settings. Will your plugin augment the original? Will I be able to us it with the XT and C4 if I also have the original?
thanks
 

Sonar Platinum
HP Envy Laptop 16GB RAM i7-4710 Windows 10
Motu 16A
Sweat and Tears with occasional profanities!
 
 
 
#59
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Control Surfaces for Sonar 2016/11/26 15:49:03 (permalink)
I'm using two Artist Series controllers for 16 tracks of volume/pan automation + transport and some other functionality (e.g., inputs, gain trim, etc.). Many, many people have reported having horrible experiences with these controllers. The fix is simply to a) download the latest software, and b) restart Eucon services after your program opens. The Behringer moving fader surfaces work too, and I use NI's Kore as a "controller scratchpad" for effects and soft synths. 
 
BTW azslow3 is a genius with control surfaces. His plug-in seemingly lets you control anything with anything, I can't recommend it enough.
 
He's also right about the Roland control surface. It was implemented well, constructed solidly, and worked fine (and still works fine, and does the Mackie protocol thing)...but hardly anyone bought it. Was it price? Well, that's what a good controller costs. 
 
As to Push and Maschine, they are designed specifically to control specific programs. Don't expect to use them with other programs (although I use Novation's Launchpad with the Matrix View).
 

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#60
Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1