JD1813
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 813
- Joined: 2008/04/16 10:25:04
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2009/12/10 13:48:16
(permalink)
I guess I've always been a CW user. Very many years ago I started with Pro Audio, upgrading it a couple times up to ver 9 when I finally decided to go for Sonar Home Studio 4. Boy was THAT a mistake for me at the time! I never got the knack of the interface and felt drowned in too many options. At about that time I also tried too many hardware upgrades, going for 24/96 capability with a MIA MIDI card, new mixer and mic; several hardware problems kept me from moving forward for a long time. My sessions turned into "how many hours can we waste trying to debug why I can't record a single track..." and I didn't know about the great forums here either. I literally walked away from recording for about 3 years. I finally got to talking with other musicians on another forum and got around the hardware issues, and I saw MC4 out there. Went for that, it worked like a champ, I grabbed MC5 soon as it came out and I was even happier. I have now decided to switch from MC to Sonar 8.5PE, this time I learned from past mistakes - I took the time to grab, download, or buy every Sonar 8 tutorial I could get my hands on, looked at the demos, read every article about every feature I could, and decided THIS was the upgrade I would commmit to from here on out - no looking back. Having ordered and received the pkg, I'm giving myself the next few weeks to prep my computer and load it all carefully, before trying to crank out new projects. But I already know it was the best bang for the buck out there, and I believe CW has made some fantastic price breaks that have given us low-end users all the reason in the world to grab hold of these fantastic tools and get even more productive. So, I'm one very excited and happy CW user!
|
macaw
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 38
- Joined: 2007/12/31 22:59:42
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2009/12/25 15:17:17
(permalink)
1. Switched from Pro-Tools / M-Audio / Sony Vegas to Sonar. 2. Sonar with the Calkwalk inteface has good Windows 7 64-bit support. I refuse to downgrade my PC to 32-bit or XP just because the other vendors are too busy playing with their Macs to write a PC driver. So to be real blunt, I use Sonar / Cakewalk because of driver support. Great job supporting 64-bit machines and Windows 7!!
|
sdpate67
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 344
- Joined: 2008/03/09 09:59:21
- Location: Charlottetown, PEI
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2009/12/29 07:26:02
(permalink)
I switched from Sound Forge LE and Tracktion and a DAW. I wanted more a computer based system with more headroom, better sound capability and more flexibility. Sound Forge LE is easy to use but when I wanted to grow I investigated all the options. I believe in open architecture in computing so MACs were out. The reviews said Cubase and Sonar were the top products and SONAR seemed more popular in North America. I read this forum for weeks and decided the support community here was bigger than over at Cubase which was the deciding factor. I started with 6 and went to 7 within months. I keep up with all updates as soon as they come out and have invested heavily in this project. While not really an expert yet, the results I get with Sonar far exceed anything I could do before.
Asus i7-760 Win 8.1/ Sonar Platinum / Lynx Aurora 16 AES16 / Mackie MCU Pro XT C4 / Millennia Media STT1 x 2 TD-1/ UAD-2 Quad x 2 / Neumann O-300 O-810 U87 KM184 x 2 / Shure 57/58 Reverbnation NJN Network
|
JClosed
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 690
- Joined: 2009/12/19 11:50:26
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/01/03 16:29:25
(permalink)
Well - I am fairly new to this whole sound editing stuff, but I must say it is amazing how fast you get used to it I owned a Yamaha mono synth some 20 years ago, and made some (admitted primitive) sound with it that some weird people even called music (No - I never found out what they where smoking to get in that utterly crazy mindset, but it must have been REALLY strong). Anyway - at the beginning of 2009 I finally made the decision to give it another try. I got myself a E-MU Xboard49 and found out I got a lot of software with it. To start with I got the Proteus X2 softsynth with several (6!) CD's filled with sound banks. I also got some sequencing/music editing software like Ableton, Cubase and Sonar. At first I tried Ableton Live, but found the software was not my "piece of cake". Next I tried Cubase. Now that was a whole lot better. I got enthousiastic and ordered Cubase essential 5. At first I liked Cubase a lot, but after some time I found the software was not as fitting in my ideas of a smooth workflow as I had anticipated. I could not place the finger at the "rough" spots, but in general the software was defenately not doing the things I hoped it should do. At that time I realised my on-board sound card was not exactly up to par, and ordered an E-Mu 0404 PCI sound card. This card came with another set of software, and I noticed there was a version of Sonar LE on one of the discs. I tried the software, and came to the conclusion this piece of software was far more fitting my ideas of a smooth workflow. One thing missing however was a good soft synth. I could use the Proteus X2, but a lot of tutorials for Sonar where based on the TTS1 that was not included in LE At that time I got hold on some still sealed package of Sonar Home Studio 6 XL. It was from a supply from a old store that had gone out of buisiness so I got the software for a "nice" price. I really liked it a lot, and when I compared Sonar to Cubase 5 essential the Sonar package came out as a winner. I was surprised. If you take in concideration the Cubase 5 package was newer than HS 6 XL it was even more amazing. Well - I took the deceision to dump the Cubase package (I could unregistrate the key and resell the package without too much loss), added some money and ordered Sonar 8.5 studio. I think it was one of the best deceisions I made. I got this package just a few weeks ago, but allready feel very comfortable with it. The stuff included with "8.5 studio" is great, and I am still exploring everything. The (pdf) reference guide included gave me the answers on the all questions I had, so until now no need to ask anything here on this site. I already know I defenately want to upgrade to the full Sonar 8.5 producer package as soon as I have the money to do so (and that wont take too long as the upgrade is less expensive then I had anticipated - Thank you Cakewalk). So there it is. I started with Cubase, but I am now fully converted to Sonar....
|
djjhart@aol.com
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2189
- Joined: 2008/10/24 08:45:46
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/01/06 15:00:02
(permalink)
I originally Started with the Ensoniq Eps, and Otari Tape , and a bunch of hardware, Mks50, tb 303, Roland Smpte box SoundCraft Board ect.. Then I switched to the Power Mac 7300, with Studio Vision pro Dsp, What a stable system Back then, I cant remember a single crash 3.5 discs Wow Audio to midi was best I ever seen ..it would work perfect... .I switched when Gibson took over..I miss my Opcode.. hahaha. I been with Sonar Since Version 2.2.
post edited by djjhart@aol.com - 2010/01/06 15:37:59
Computer - Intel Q9550, Intel BX48bt2 MB, W8 64 bit. 8 gb Ram, SSD Hardware - Tascam Fw1884 Control surface only, Ni S49 Komplete Kontroll,Roland Quad Capture, Ni Machine,Kore, Focusrite A/D converter, Blue Mic, Roland Gaia, Akai Mpk49, Yamaha HS80 Monitors.Software - Sonar Platinum , Vengeance VPS bundle,Sugar Bytes Effectrix, Turnado, NI Komplete 10 Ultimate, Dune, Rob Papen Blade , Delay, Punch Evolved. http://soundcloud.com/johnhartson/tracks http://www.youtube.com/user/jhart1313
|
Loek van Kersbergen
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 34
- Joined: 2008/10/22 05:26:31
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/01/08 16:38:23
(permalink)
Dear all, I switched to Sonar around mid / end 2008. I used it at first to do some recording , but more and more I'm getting into it....and it's great!! On the (this) forum I contacted several times with questions and my collegue users always helped me out. Now I got an advise from one of the Sonar users ( Don) to upgrade to 8.5 --- so... I listened and followed his advise!! Let me tell all of you one thing: I ordered the 8.5 last tuesday...AND I already got my software through door-to-door delivery TODAY!! How much better can it get!!! WOW I was already impressed by the way the software works for me BUT I'm even more impressed by the way Cakewalk delivers what they promise. I'm from Holland... and I live in a nice country...( at least that's what I hear from other people  .... But there are a lot of companies in my country that cannot deliver my ordered materials within the time Cakewalk needed to process and deliver my order from US to Holland. We have a saying here: Chapeau !!!!!! ( it's French language for : I'll take my hat of....compliments!!!!!!). Thanks again Cakewalk for being as professional as you are ( again).... it makes me feel good to be able to trust a company that delivers the materials that at their turn enable me to perform my job better!! Thanxxxx Loek
post edited by Loek van Kersbergen - 2010/01/08 16:41:56
|
ernboogie
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4
- Joined: 2010/01/21 01:17:33
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/01/21 01:32:42
(permalink)
Switching to Sonar became more convenient, at 64bit, mastering can be done right at your desktop or laptop. Recording vocals gave me issue with other sofware recording programs. Sonar has given me an opportunity to cut the amount of time I spend recording with its internal sounds and I haven't noticed much of a Latency issue yet. No freezes, no buffer hardware worries, it has been a pleasure and a breeze. I can really focus on a better production and product. Way to go! CAKEWALK! www.sellmorebeats.coms
|
LJB
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1502
- Joined: 2009/07/29 10:31:31
- Location: South Africa
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/01/21 03:20:27
(permalink)
I started on Cakewalk 3.4 in the early 90's! Last year I decided to check out ProTools 7.1 M-Powered as a possible additional tool in the bag. I got so annoyed at all the features that are just not there, such as no OMF file support etc, that I just realised how user-friendly Sonar actually is. Running 8.5 PE on a professional basis and very happy thanks! Ludwig bouwer One Big Room Studios www.onebigroom.co.za
Ludwig Bouwer, One Big Room Studios. -------------------- Cakewalk with all the trimmings / Win 10Pro 64 / Intel i7-7700 / Asus Prime Z270k / 16GB DDR4 / RME HDSP9652 / RME UFX / Black Lion Audio ADA8000 / ART MPA & ART Pro Channel / Focusrite Voicemaster Pro / Aphex 107 Check out my work at www.onebigroom.co.za
|
Rampdog
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 529
- Joined: 2006/06/11 10:29:04
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/01/30 20:59:05
(permalink)
I started with HS-4 a few years ago... Upgraded to 6XL and found it fairly friendly... I'm not a "RTFM" guy but I did some but you guys in here taught me alot... Scott's books helped too... I just ordered 8.5 Studio that should be here in a day or so... All I really know is Cakewalk so I can't compare it to anything else... Just don't forget there's a few of us dummy's out there that aren't engineers...
Windows XP Pro 32x Sonar X1d Producer Intel i7 Quad Core 3x3 Gig RAM Mackie Onyx 1220i Casio PX-110 88 Keyboard Korg K61 P / Midi Keyboard Assorted Guitars http://soundcloud.com/ramps
|
chops2010
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 72
- Joined: 2010/01/17 20:51:09
- Location: Kirkcaldy Scotland
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/02/06 06:10:14
(permalink)
Hello from Scotland! Sonar Vs Cubase! Hello from Scotland, Over the last few years i have went from Ejay to Reason to FL Studio then it was crunch time - where do i go next Sonar or Cubase . As i would describe myself as the Hobby - ist music maker i was pondering on the thought of spending £400.00 of my hard earned cash along with another sum for a new PC. Then when i was able to justify the expense to my soul i then started to read up on what each were about , downloaded LE versions and played about. What stole the show was the marketing behind sonar - i.e. made by Musicians for Musicians . Watched a few videos on You Tube regarding what i can do with the software and then decided to buy it ! When it arrived i sat patiently watching all the goodies being delivered to my harddrive. Then got started the sounds, the choices the flexibility WOW - i still have not scratched the surface on what i can do with Sonar 8.5 Producer but thats why i pirchased it - keep me busy! On a not so high note - the day after i had purachased it i got a email saying buy our products with this discount code and you can get 20% off - hmm, i thought typical - but as the marketing describes made by musicians for musicians i thought i would email customer service to see if there were any deals or freebies i could obtain as it was in with 24 hours to then receive an email saying you can download "cakewalk"fx free - giving the fact i had just purchased the flag ship products the fx although good for free were already bundles into pack. As i do work in the customer service / sales industry i do know offers will pop up now and again , but given the time scales i thought something could have been done to reimburce or promo code for any future purchase. Not being huffy - then decided to upgrade to rapture (amazing synth) at 69 then got a email saying buy it at 35 and then i purchased SWA HD Sonar 8.5 to download it for it not to play ( i have contaced them with no reply) i then downloaded SWA video Sonar 8 for it to work - so as you can read i am determined to learn and create with your product(s) but i do feel that the amount of extra cash i have spent i.e. the difference on the HPPY discount and the discount on rapture i could have spent on other Sonar/Partner products. So i am assumuing the person at the end of my email to customer service is not a laid back Musician - as i did not want to go down the route of cancelling the product to then re order. On the positive side - i am now 30 seconds into my 1st tune made on Sonar and will continue to produce with the product as it is FAB its just the customer service and the reailty of losing pounds to buy more goodies! Thanks, Chris runarecordings@hotmail.co.uk
|
eyesofrapture
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 32
- Joined: 2005/12/19 20:37:03
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/02/17 01:28:09
(permalink)
I started out in the DOS days with Band In A Box and switched to Music Creator Pro 24 because the GUI was easy to use and understand. Then I needed VST options, so I upgraded to Sonar. Know what I'd consider the greatest invention since water? Visualize this: Sonar On A Stick. That's right. Picture a USB flash device where Sonar and everything it needs--including drivers, soft synths, and a build-in headphone jack-- is right there, plug-and-play, and it works every single time with no problems. If your hard drive crashes, no problem; everything you need is on the USB/Firewire device. No IRQ conflicts, no errant device drivers, no incompatible hardware, just plug-and-play simplicity. Achieve this, and I shall personally erect a large temple somewhere in honor of Cakewalk.
|
WorshipMaestro
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10
- Joined: 2010/02/03 10:25:39
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/03/17 16:32:11
(permalink)
Quite simple, really: 64bit support that really works! I've been an avid Cubase user for many years, presently working on 5.1.2. The future is 64 bit, and after nothing but problems with plugins on Cubase 64 bit, Sonar 8.5 on both Vista 64 bit and Win7 64 bit is just flawless. Projects with 32 bit plugs just load up and work, without a lot of drama. The Sonar 32-64 bit bridging solution is well done; Cubase's is a disaster! A close second would be the whole dongle thing. I regularly work in my work studio and my home studio, and live in fear that I'll lose the dongle, or break it with the constant inserting and removal that I do daily. Not an issue with Sonar.
|
digitalboy
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 173
- Joined: 2007/08/20 12:38:42
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/03/17 20:59:22
(permalink)
Once upon a time in a far off land..............and they all lived happily ever after :) ajw
Sorry - I don't use Autotune :)
|
mapinduzi
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8
- Joined: 2010/04/07 02:44:02
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/04/07 03:29:26
(permalink)
I've been using Logic 5.5 since apple took Emagic. Been busy studying fiction writing ... but ready to get back into music. Didn't want to go to apple for several reasons but really didn't know what existed for PC. Did some research and tried the Sonar 8 demo and got excited. Now I got 8.5 and am looking forward to a summer of learning and creation. update ... after spending a day I'm totally loving Sonar, why oh why did I wait this long?! I was afraid it wouldn't be intuitive, but it all makes sense so far, everything hooked up without a fuss, fx, instruments, content, etc. is great/amazing. The only thing lacking in software is my brain, time to hit the theory books again. Thank you Cakewalk! Sonar is just what I needed. xoxo, Mapinduzi
post edited by mapinduzi - 2010/04/09 21:19:25
|
ivanh3
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 33
- Joined: 2007/03/31 09:46:37
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/04/11 18:55:15
(permalink)
Started out with Cakewalk when it was a DOS sequencer. Did a full CD release for my old band Usherhouse by syncing that with an ADAT rig and the BRC. Came to Cakewalk again at CW 9, and then later at Sonar 4 or 5. Now I am at 8.5 PE. Love it.
Sonar Platinum, Pro Tools, Reaper Behringer X32 Windows 10, I7-3770k, 32 GB ram "You can't fight in here...This is the war room!"
|
PabloMack
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2010/04/11 18:50:49
- Status: offline
Port Edirol Orchestral-HQ to Windows 7!
2010/04/11 22:23:35
(permalink)
I started with Music Creator 2002 (a Cakewalk product) in 2003 and bought Dimension Pro later on. I then bought Sonar 6 Producer a couple of years ago. Almost all of my work is software synth and I really got Music Creator only because it was bundled with Edirol Orchestral-HQ (an absolutely wonderful product, the likes of which has never been duplicated to my knowledge). Just last month, Cakewalk offered an upgrade deal on Sonar 8.5 Producer so I bought it for my new AMD Windows 7-64 computer that I use mostly for CGI. But after all the work I did with Music Creator with mostly the Edirol Orchestral-HQ (love the product!) I was disappointed that Edirol discontinued it and I may never get a 64-bit version because it is no longer produced. Because my work uses Orchestral HQ so heavily, I doubt that I will be using Sonar 8.5 any time soon appreciably because Cakewalk doesn't make any software synths that come even close the the quality and usability of the Edirol Orch-HQ product. I have spent some time with Dimension Pro but I find it to only be a specialty synth that is only used now and then for a special purpose because it is more trouble to use (as with all of the other Cakewalk synths I have). Cakewalk synths were designed for hardware sound guys used to hardware sound boxes and were not designed for modern computer people who don't come with the background and baggage that dedicated hardware box people have. So the Edirol Orchestral HQ was and will continue to be my workhorse when it comes to rendering my compositions into audible sound. Let me add that I do not have, and probably will never have, any MIDI hardware. I am a computer guy and the keyboard I use says QWERTY on the keys. I score most all my music and only add sound effects where needed so audio tracks only rarely get used in my music. Where I do use audio tracks is for recording narrations that I use to produce industrial training videos. Let me say that, even though most of the sounds that come out of the VSC that comes with Sonar sound cheap and cheasy, it does have a few good ones like the steel drums, and the pan pipe and a few others. But the strings are horrible and that is where GPO could be used. However, Edirol Orchestral HQ is much easier to use and accounts for up 90% of my orchestration. My only complaints with that product are: 1) EO-HQ is limited to 16 channels (Dimension Pro is limited to 4 but you can instantiate another one-a minor pain), 2) EO-HQ requires me to put the disk back in every couple of weeks, and most of all 3) EO-HQ was not ported to Windows 7 and has been discontinued. Looks like my old XP system with only a P4 will become my dedicated DAW and my new system will likely only be used for computer modelling/animation and video editing (visual stuff). Too bad. I was hoping to do some surround sound. But without Edirol Orchestral-HQ, what's the point? SO CAKEWALK MARKETING, IF YOU ARE READING THIS: PLEASE BRING BACK Edirol Orchestral-HQ! I don't care what you want to call it. It is better than any of the synths you have (by far)!
post edited by PabloMack - 2010/04/17 00:04:09
|
in2bronte
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4
- Joined: 2010/02/10 12:20:57
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/04/12 21:43:38
(permalink)
I was struggling with a four track tape recorder and discovered Band in A Box - I bought some audio recording software from them - I think it was called Master Tracks Pro or some such thing. It was wonderful I thought and made some ok demos with it. Then we decided to make a CD and the studio was running Sonar 2.0 and I fell in love with it. I recently upgraded from 6.0 to 8.5 running 64 bit. Amazingly I seem to be able to keep my studio pc networked and use it for internet as well and never miss a beat in Sonar. I am working on a 34 track project with lots of plugs and never had a dropout. I love Win 7 64 bit and think companies like Waves plug-ins have missed the boat not converting to 64 bit. My days of buying seperate plugs ins are almost over with the power of the included effects in 8.5. The only thing beside that I have now is S Tracts S3 . I am having a blast ...
Sonar Producer 8.5 64bit, M-Audio Fast Track Ultra (USB), Wavelab 6, plus gear Windows 7 Home Premium Home Edition (64 bit)6.01.7600 Mainboard : Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P Chipset : AMD RD770 Processor : AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 800 MHz Physical Memory : 6144 MB (3 x 2048 DDR3-SDRAM ) Video Card : NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Hard Disk : ST31000528AS (1000 GB) Windows Performance Index : 5.9
|
RonnyStrings
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 17
- Joined: 2010/04/28 19:19:50
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/04/28 19:44:51
(permalink)
Well I have been d king around with guitar tracks pro 3 and sonar le and studio 6 for a couple of years and Had a hard time getting everything to work the way I wanted it. (Plugins, Midi, Axiom61,toneport, pod farm and what not.) By the time I got everything set up and sounding. I didnt want to play anymore. So I said screw it and bought 8.5. Just installed it and wham. Playing within 5 minutes, maybe 10. I know that 80% of the stuff packed in here i will never use but man its fun when it works. Also I haven't checked my midi controller yet but Im looking forward to giving ACT another try. 1 more thing Wsup everybody this is RonnyStrings
|
sammyp
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 752
- Joined: 2004/05/20 23:39:43
- Location: N.B. Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/05/06 01:39:52
(permalink)
circa 2003 i moved from a Boss BR 8 to Sonar 3......hmm....to date that stands up as a sound decision!
|
leasecleaning
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2010/05/13 14:52:29
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/05/13 18:40:27
(permalink)
home studio timeline: reels, then cassette, then took a break for years... bought Sonar 3 @ Lentine's Music in 2003- used it flawlessly up to 2009 bought Sonar 6 @ Ebay in 2009 Don't stop now... Surf's Up
|
personrandom
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 103
- Joined: 2008/09/13 12:39:54
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/05/17 20:02:59
(permalink)
The sound quality and the sequencer. To me the sequencer is *exactly* how it should be. I personally find it stunning how other DAW's don't make effective use of the right-click feature. With Sonar, you right-click on the piano-roll note, and you get instant clear access to all of the vital adjustments. Plus there is a subtle coloring feature: lower midi dynamic levels have a more faded rectangle. That way you can easily spot a note that is dynamically mis-matched to its surroundings, because the color shading will be noticeably different. Add to that the easy copy-paste capabilities to move sections around, and you have the king of sequencers. This is especially true in today's virtual synth environment. There is nothing better. Some sequencers force you into a box, but never let you out of it. Others make it difficult to build the box in the first place. Sonar lets you go easily in and out of "the box". The sound quality: 64 bits does indeed make a difference. No DAW company is more committed to 64 bit than Cakewalk. The fact that you can stay completely 64-bit, even in effects chains and plugins, shows leadership. As a final note: when Sonar first came out, the interface was so clunky I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole. But now, it's not just "adequate". It's beautiful and spectacular.
|
Vajnar
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2010/05/25 00:44:31
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/02 22:26:01
(permalink)
I changed to Sonar 8.5 Producer because I have around 100 songs I wrote to keep track of. I was keeping track of them with a Roland VS-880, a Roland XP-80 and an Alesis SR-16 drum machine. In order to be able to 'play' music, there was too much preparation necessary (changing to different drives and songs) to have fun. For me, it had become somewhat of a hassle. I read a lot of what other people had to say about all the DAW's and thought Sonar would be the best value and that I should purchase 8.5 Producer for the sound library and a few other things.
|
acousticvillage
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14
- Joined: 2010/05/27 16:36:21
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/04 15:33:53
(permalink)
I started with a Fostex 8-track reel to reel synced up to CreatorSL. Then moved to Logic Audio Platinum 4. I have finally moved to Sonar because the layout of the screen is most similar to the traditonal sequencers I am used to. The ease of use and the fact that it works with audio so well is fantastic. The bundles of VSTs that come with it are great. The whole interface is much more user friendly than Ableton, Cubase, Pro-tools, etc. I don't want to be tied to one OS either. I dislike the fact that there are certain things my old sequencer could do ten years ago that Sonar cannot do. For example, Logic 4 had a brilliant tool called "De-Mix Note/Channel". If you had, say a drum pattern on one sequence (clip), you could "demix" this clip by note, and end up with the kicks on one track, snare on another, hi-hats on another, etc. Really useful for further editing.
|
Marketing [Cakewalk]
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 276
- Joined: 2005/07/22 13:19:58
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/04 16:17:23
(permalink)
acousticvillage I dislike the fact that there are certain things my old sequencer could do ten years ago that Sonar cannot do. For example, Logic 4 had a brilliant tool called "De-Mix Note/Channel". If you had, say a drum pattern on one sequence (clip), you could "demix" this clip by note, and end up with the kicks on one track, snare on another, hi-hats on another, etc. Really useful for further editing. Hey Acousticvillage, Actually, this is a little esoteric, but this particular MIDI edit you would like to do has been possible since Cakewalk Professional in the early 90s through a feature called CAL (Cakewalk Application Language). CAL made it possible for power users to create scripts for our sequencer to add features that were not already built into the application. Essentially you select your MIDI track, then click Process, at the bottom of the choices there are triangles to show more choices, one of them is Run CAL. All you then need to do is select the proper CAL script There are a wide variety of functions that are available. SONAR does not ship with CAL Scripts, anymore but it is still functional and there are a wide variety available to download from the web. You can find the one you are looking for here: ftp://ftp.cakewalk.com/pub/CAL/Split Notes to Tracks CAL.zip Hope that helps. Best regards, Carl
|
lukasapostol
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1
- Joined: 2008/01/14 15:51:34
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/08 15:40:00
(permalink)
Hello. I SIMPLY LOST MY CAKEWALK SONAR 7 PRODUCER EDITION. I am thankful for any help. Steven
post edited by lukasapostol - 2011/05/24 08:00:12
|
dlnation
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2010/06/08 20:48:22
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/09 09:40:59
(permalink)
I changed from REASON to SONAR, i unistalled everything to use SONAR, installed SONAR - but when trying to run it i get a FATAL error. :(:(:(
|
J.O.P
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9
- Joined: 2010/06/15 15:40:28
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/15 16:39:50
(permalink)
I didn't really switch as I still use Ableton Suite 8. I recently purchased Sonar 8.5 a week ago and there are a few things I like about it better than Live. 1. Less of a resource hog. 2. Mixing and mastering in it is less of a pain. 3. The media browser. 4. The event history. This seems to be a very deep program, but I hope to get to grips with it over time.
|
hueseph
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 131
- Joined: 2010/06/16 19:44:52
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/16 19:48:52
(permalink)
Hey Sonar Users! My name is hue. I go by hueseph on most forums. I was turned on to Sonar by the administrator of recording.org where I co-moderate the DAW pro audio forum. Recently I was fortunate enough to acquire Sonar Producer 8.5 via a blog contest. I hope to be blogging on the basic set up and recording, editing, and mixdown of audio and midi on that forum. I am a former Cubase user and still have and am running a copy of ProTools LE running on my computer. I'm a metal head, jazz fan, classical hack, folkie and generally am a rock and roll oriented kind of musician. Some may have had a bad experience with me because I don't like to mince words. I tell it like I see it. I don't give false praise but I try to give credit where credit is due. That is who I am in a nutshell. I'm here to learn as much as I can. Don't chastise me for being a NEWB! :P I'll do my best not to irritate anyone. Hopefully, it will be a good experience! This is the best I've got right now. Yeah it's hackery at it's best. Testing 1 2 3
|
mikespitzer
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 300
- Joined: 2009/05/30 11:58:33
- Status: offline
Re:Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/18 21:21:02
(permalink)
Technically speaking I should probably be a fan of PRO TOOLS, but i prefer SONAR. My background ..... I am 47 years old and grew up with big mixers, analog reel multitracks and outboard effects racks (ie..... the classic recording studio). I worked with guitarist Yngwie Malmsteen for several years also. I stayed loyal to analog until 1-2 years ago, but when it got harder and harder to keep my analog recorders fixed and running,m I decided to bite the bullet and move to the digital domain. I had used things like the Otari radar systems and stand alone Fostex digital recorders, but these were really just used as replacements for analog tape decks. All the same mixers and effects rack equipment was still used. When I decided to switch to DAW for my home recording use, I tried both PRO TOOLS and SONAR. I don't use MIDI, I don't use loops, I don't use sequencing, etc... I only plug-ins for EQ and delays ..... for my reverbs I still run the signals out to a high quality Lexicon Reverb unit as I feel it sounds nicer than Plug-In Reverbs. I record all Audio tracks on rock bands using real drums, real guitars, real keyboards, etc... So theoretically PRO TOOLS should have been the more logical choice for the type of recording I do (since Pro Tools started as a pure audio multitrack DAW years ago) However, after trying both systems side by side, I found the CONSOLE and TRACK EDIT screens on SONAR more logical and easy to work with. I also liked SONAR's open system that works with any choice of interface card as opposed to Pro Tool's limited compatibility (I use an M-Audio Delta 1010 PCI interface). As we all know, sound quality is really determined by the interface, not the DAW software so whatever is a friendlier work environment is really up to your personal preference. I confess, If I knew I was going to be working with other musicians or bands or studios in a collaborative effort where we needed to share project files, then I would go with PRO TOOLS because it honestly does have the advantage of being the "industry standard". For example --- how many major movie soundtracks or albums can you name that were recorded on SONAR ??? However, since I am doing all solo work in my own studio, I prefer the SONAR system. I would like to see SONAR make more inroads into the professional music industry with more major movies and album releases produced with SONAR so that Cakewalk would get a more professional reputation and not only be viewed as ..... "the stuff amateurs and semi-pros use at home". It seems PRO TOOLS is still viewed as the professional's choice ......... while SONAR is still viewed as the software for all the non-professionals to use.
|
acousticvillage
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14
- Joined: 2010/05/27 16:36:21
- Status: offline
Re: RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2010/06/22 05:59:40
(permalink)
Dear Marketing....thanks so much for your reply. I didn't really realise what CAL was about. This sounds fantastic. Well....given what you've said, I don't think I have any more on my Wish List. Thanks a million...what a brilliant forum. Jim
|