Dave Modisette
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11050
- Joined: 2003/11/13 22:12:55
- Location: Brandon, Florida
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 08:48:09
(permalink)
I've done some mixes using my mixer as a summing mixer by sending stems out to a DAT. I felt like it sounded better but the rub was that I never seemed to be able to get a repeatable mix if I came back and tried it all over again a month later. So I decided that it wasn't worth the difference in sound.
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 13:35:21
(permalink)
However, the argument is that analog summing injects the sound of a familiar mixer/console into the music. Sonar's 64 bit summing bus doesn't do that. On the contrary, it makes our recordings sound cleaner, which is not bad. It just doesn't add character, which is what the mix needs in order to sound more 'organic' and less 'digital'. This is what a summing mixer or plugin does, and I find that the current generation of plugins are beginning to compare favorably against their analog counterparts. I understand, but I would argue that it's not the summing per se that alters the sound, it's the general behavior of the analog circuits, the non-linear frequency/phase response, addition of noise, etc., and you should be able to get essentially the same result by summing to Master in SONAR, and sending that full mix through a single channel of the magical summing mixer. Plus it's hard to imagine that the sound of any one mixer would make all mixes of all types of music sound "better" than the digital mix. To me, this is a classic cure-all, snake-oil kind of claim. Any positive result you get is largely based on expectations, and reconciling the cognitive dissnance that would result from dropping a large wad of cash on Dr. Goldenear's Magic Music Elixer, and not hearing an improvement.
|
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4604
- Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 13:43:51
(permalink)
Too many good analog simulators (which arent necessary but great to have) now to even say the word hardware for mixing- hardware on the way in? Oh yeah ;)
Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard i7 3770k CPU 32 gigs RAM Presonus AudioBox iTwo Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51 Presonus Eureka Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 14:42:42
(permalink)
brundlefly However, the argument is that analog summing injects the sound of a familiar mixer/console into the music. Sonar's 64 bit summing bus doesn't do that. On the contrary, it makes our recordings sound cleaner, which is not bad. It just doesn't add character, which is what the mix needs in order to sound more 'organic' and less 'digital'. This is what a summing mixer or plugin does, and I find that the current generation of plugins are beginning to compare favorably against their analog counterparts.
I understand, but I would argue that it's not the summing per se that alters the sound, it's the general behavior of the analog circuits, the non-linear frequency/phase response, addition of noise, etc., and you should be able to get essentially the same result by summing to Master in SONAR, and sending that full mix through a single channel of the magical summing mixer. Plus it's hard to imagine that the sound of any one mixer would make all mixes of all types of music sound "better" than the digital mix. To me, this is a classic cure-all, snake-oil kind of claim. Any positive result you get is largely based on expectations, and reconciling the cognitive dissnance that would result from dropping a large wad of cash on Dr. Goldenear's Magic Music Elixer, and not hearing an improvement. Thing is that, at least with the plugin emulations I have tried, the effect is very subtle unless you apply it to multiple tracks and/or stems. I assume this is the same with the hardware version of these consoles, since that's what they emulate. You need to apply their 'sound' or 'character' onto several tracks/busses to actually hear what it does to the track, and even then, the effect should be subtle (although that also depends on the console, of course). Is one console the right choice for every track? No. I agree that the console used will vary with the type and feel of the song and/or the effect wanted. That's what I like the best about plugin emulations. They give us the freedom to choose the sound we want with ease (just click a button and hear the sound change). There are even some people who don't use their hardware units as much anymore because they can get similar results with plugin emulations, and that says a lot. Basically, I kinda agree with you, except I do think that you do need to apply the sound character over multiple tracks/stems with some of the hardware summing consoles out there. Take care!
Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz 8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz ATI Radeon HD 3650 Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64 Cubase 6.03 x64 Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64 RME FireFace 400 Frontier Design Alpha Track Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 14:54:16
(permalink)
Basically, I kinda agree with you, except I do think that you do need to apply the sound character over multiple tracks/stems with some of the hardware summing consoles out there. Yes, I considered that possibility, but I think the main thing that would get added by running multiple channles is more noise and D/A errors on the outputs to the mixer.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 15:30:48
(permalink)
From a PDF for the VVC from Steven Slate WHY ANALOG MIXING? Many of today’s top mixers still mix on analog consoles. Over the past decade, many pro audio companies have even made “analog summing busses” so that recording engineers could sum their digital tracks externally in the analog domain. Most engineers who sum with analog summing busses and mixers claim that mixing analog gives their music more space, depth, width, punch, and “vibe”. So this brings up a few questions. - What’s wrong with digital summing? - What makes analog summing “better”? To answer this first question, we first made several digital mixers to test. One of them was a 32bit floating point mixer, the other 48bit fixed integer mixer. These are the most popular types of digital mixers offered in today’s digital audio workstations. We ran dozens of tests with the digital mixers, trying to find out why they would not perform as well sonically as an old analog console. The result was a bit surprising. What we found, was that there was absolutely NOTHING wrong with digital summing. It is actually a fairly straightforward and simple digital process, and nothing about it would reduce bandwidth or create any negative artifacts on the mix. Then, we began to run some tests on several vintage analog consoles. Again, the results were surprising. Some of the analog desks were FAR from perfect. We found that the analog circuits created many nonlinear and dynamic artifacts such as harmonic distortion, phase distortion, component saturation, and crosstalk. This was rather odd, since so many engineers claim that analog desks sound better than digital mixers. Therefore, the only conclusion is that these nonlinear artifacts sound “musical” to the human ear. Excerpted from Virtual Console Collection Beta 2 quick user guide Anybody bother to read this?
post edited by John - 2010/10/02 15:35:54
|
nprime
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2423
- Joined: 2004/08/16 19:19:49
- Location: Vancouver
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 15:33:27
(permalink)
Same old story isn't it? Humans apparently like artifacts in their audio. Must be something about the way we are wired.
Listen Sonar 5PE Intel DP35DP, E6750, 3 GB, 80GB/320 GB Scope (6 DSP) w/A16 interface PadKontrol, Legacy Series MS20, EZDrummer.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 15:44:01
(permalink)
It could be what some of us are used to. After all what does "sound good" really mean? I judge fidelity by how well I am deceived by the reproduced sound into thinking I am hearing the live sound. Then I wonder if many of us want fidelity at all? Fidelity meaning true to the original.
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 16:07:09
(permalink)
brundlefly Basically, I kinda agree with you, except I do think that you do need to apply the sound character over multiple tracks/stems with some of the hardware summing consoles out there.
Yes, I considered that possibility, but I think the main thing that would get added by running multiple channles is more noise and D/A errors on the outputs to the mixer. Yes, that is the trade off and something one needs to consider when summing to an analog box. You need high quality converters to get the most of of this process, since it does require one or several passes through the converters. But again, the plugins we have noadays sound really good and will very soon make analog summing boxes a thing of the past (finally!).
Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz 8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz ATI Radeon HD 3650 Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64 Cubase 6.03 x64 Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64 RME FireFace 400 Frontier Design Alpha Track Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 16:19:01
(permalink)
analog summing boxes a thing of the past
Are they? Are they a thing of the past or are they a result of the digital age? A thing of the present? I would be surprised if they existed in a pure analog world. What would have been the point of them? Make analog more analog?
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 17:29:31
(permalink)
The steven slate satements is what I've been saying, and some other good comments between it and mine. Analog consoles have lots of electrical goodies in them when a signal runs through it. I mean, look at a single channel of a good console. Éven a high-quality console will "add" to the sound. Whether you like this addition or are simply used to hearing it on your favorite songs growing up is a matter of taste. I imagine there are a lot of younger folks doing the home studio thing that love the clear, pristine "sound" of digital. Cool for them and it certianly doesn't interfer w/ me enjoying music done that way. However, I prefer analog, esp. for my own stuff or that I work on. I hope that doesn't get anyone's panties in a wad. summing boxes, as told and sold, don't really work for me theoritically. I'd love one if I had a bunch of analog channel strips, comps, eqs, etc. and could use such hardware on the channels. It would come close to replicating the big console sound. As it is, I don't have the bankroll and usually stick w/ a stereo comp, some digital hardware and software when I "mix" out a song. I have found a single high-end analog input channel really, really helps when recording to provide the kind of "sound" I prefer. But just clean analog "summing" is adding probably nothing more than the electronics of the output of the summing bus. There have been several times I've read that breaking out stems doesn't sound any different than running a stereo signal through a summing unit. But again, there is no right and wrong when it comes to taste. As those that grew up on LPs go gently or not into the night and more and more of the people that grew up on digital define the cultural norm, there will be less and less analog saturation/distorition arguements, except among audiophiles and engineers. if you want to sum, fine, but don't try to convince me to break out stems to sum in analog over a clean machine. Instead, give me a console that I can play. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 18:50:09
(permalink)
John analog summing boxes a thing of the past Are they? Are they a thing of the past or are they a result of the digital age? A thing of the present? I would be surprised if they existed in a pure analog world. What would have been the point of them? Make analog more analog? I guess "the past" is a relative term, but my point still holds. Analog summing boxes are a product of the digital age (of course), and they've been around for a while (they're nothing new). I never said nor implied otherwise. Not sure where you got that idea from, John.
Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz 8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz ATI Radeon HD 3650 Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64 Cubase 6.03 x64 Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64 RME FireFace 400 Frontier Design Alpha Track Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
|
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9736
- Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
- Location: Las Vegas
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 18:52:37
(permalink)
I don't think our fascination for distortion is strictly a result of growing up listening to analog era music - the African tradition of buzzing and rattling is at the root of pop music (pop as in pretty much everything from jazz to death metal). It just gives a certain "fullness" to the sound. So whether it's actual tubes or analog tape emulation or bit reducers, I don't see distortion going away anytime soon - it's an integral part of the equation. Ironically - a couple of years ago, I went to see Nine Inch Nails. Though the sound was respectably loud, it was so clean and static compared to what I've been used to hear live that it actually disturbed me. It felt surreal - something was missing, it just didn't blend...
post edited by Rain - 2010/10/02 18:54:40
TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
|
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6585
- Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 18:53:13
(permalink)
John From a PDF for the VVC from Steven Slate WHY ANALOG MIXING? Many of today’s top mixers still mix on analog consoles.... What we found, was that there was absolutely NOTHING wrong with digital summing. It is actually a fairly straightforward and simple digital process, and nothing about it would reduce bandwidth or create any negative artifacts on the mix. Then, we began to run some tests on several vintage analog consoles. Again, the results were surprising. Some of the analog desks were FAR from perfect. We found that the analog circuits created many nonlinear and dynamic artifacts such as harmonic distortion, phase distortion, component saturation, and crosstalk. This was rather odd, since so many engineers claim that analog desks sound better than digital mixers. Therefore, the only conclusion is that these nonlinear artifacts sound “musical” to the human ear. Excerpted from Virtual Console Collection Beta 2 quick user guide The surprising thing about this to me is that they would find any of this surprising.
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 19:07:20
(permalink)
I know :-) This has been a known fact since the start of the digital age. But oh well lol.
Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz 8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz ATI Radeon HD 3650 Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64 Cubase 6.03 x64 Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64 RME FireFace 400 Frontier Design Alpha Track Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 19:15:58
(permalink)
The surprising thing about this to me is that they would find any of this surprising. You do have a point! LOL I have known this for as long a I have known about audio. Heck, they could have just asked me.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 19:34:18
(permalink)
Jose7822 John analog summing boxes a thing of the past Are they? Are they a thing of the past or are they a result of the digital age? A thing of the present? I would be surprised if they existed in a pure analog world. What would have been the point of them? Make analog more analog? I guess "the past" is a relative term, but my point still holds. Analog summing boxes are a product of the digital age (of course), and they've been around for a while (they're nothing new). I never said nor implied otherwise. Not sure where you got that idea from, John. I guess you didn't notice the smiley face. Altough it was in response to your post it was not directed so much to you but all those that may think such a concept has always been around. It is sort of in keeping with Bits post asking what the heck one is and why one would want one anyway. I am the perfect candidate for a analog mixing box. After all I am completely digital and have been for some time and now feel analog deprived. Not really.
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 20:42:19
(permalink)
John, I did notice your smiley, but interpreted it another way (my bad). Sometimes it's hard to tell how things are said online. BTW, is it me, or is the forum software acting up by not showing the complete 'Quick Reply' box? I keep having to get out and come back to the thread in order to reply.
Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz 8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz ATI Radeon HD 3650 Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64 Cubase 6.03 x64 Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64 RME FireFace 400 Frontier Design Alpha Track Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/02 20:44:30
(permalink)
I noticed an inability to log in a bit back. I think its acting up again.
|
jcamp
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 76
- Joined: 2005/11/14 09:43:01
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/03 10:10:54
(permalink)
John Then I wonder if many of us want fidelity at all? Think about the ipod generation. Everone listening to mp3 or some other data comression format. How will future engineers train their ears to true fidelity? Will we be mixing to compensate for poor fidelity???When you think about it, most of us were brought up on records, with wonderful recordings made on wonderful analog gear...with all of it's flaws and all of it's character. That's how we "trained" our ears to like what we like. Right on John!!!!
|
Meffy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2003/11/22 16:41:23
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/03 11:54:22
(permalink)
I can't help feeling an important facet of the issue is being overlooked. How many percent better? [/tired_old_bromide]
|
nprime
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2423
- Joined: 2004/08/16 19:19:49
- Location: Vancouver
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/03 12:46:19
(permalink)
Obviously...20-40% better.
Listen Sonar 5PE Intel DP35DP, E6750, 3 GB, 80GB/320 GB Scope (6 DSP) w/A16 interface PadKontrol, Legacy Series MS20, EZDrummer.
|
Meffy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2003/11/22 16:41:23
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/03 20:57:07
(permalink)
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/04 01:39:49
(permalink)
Think about the ipod generation. I try not to.
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/04 11:52:38
(permalink)
JohnSome of the analog desks were FAR from perfect. We found that the analog circuits created many nonlinear and dynamic artifacts such as harmonic distortion, phase distortion, component saturation, and crosstalk. Don't all amplifiers, speaker crossovers/coils/cones/enclosures and listening environments do the same things in different ways? Why bother with an analog console when you and your listeners are already getting that and more from the output stage of your/their audio systems? Snake oil.
|
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13829
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/04 12:28:29
(permalink)
Yea, thanks John, ol pal, for relaying the Steven Slate "explanation" for AS. I loved that. How refreshingly honest. No...there's nothing wrong with digital summing...some folks just want to color up their sound and we're happy to oblige them. That's it. We have met the enemy and he is us!
post edited by yorolpal - 2010/10/04 14:59:00
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/04 12:30:18
(permalink)
The thing that I don't understand is that back in 'the day' audio gear companies spent millions trying to make their products as good and perfect as possible. From the early days of hot valves, through noisy transistors to high tech analogue ICs, the ultimate aim was to make the product as perfect as possible. The more money that was spent, the closer to perfection you got. Then came digital and 2+2 finally equaled 4 and not 3.9999986 or 4.000024 and suddenly every one wants their mixes to be distorted and imperfect... Analogue summing can never be called "better" than digital simply because "better" is totaly subjective and can not be measured. "Different" is the only discriptor that can be used with any acuracy. Does a grand piano sound "better" or just "different" to an upright piano? Does a Marshal amp sound "better" or "different" to a Fender? "Analogue summing sounds DIFFERENT to digital summing"
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/04 13:00:00
(permalink)
Don't all amplifiers, speaker crossovers/coils/cones/enclosures and listening environments do the same things in different ways? Why bother with an analog console when you and your listeners are already getting that and more from the output stage of your/their audio systems? Snake oil. Profoundly true. Yea, thanks John, ol pal, for relaying the Steven Slate "explanation" for AS. I loved that. How refreshingly honest. No...there's nothing wrong with digital summing...some folks just want to color up their sound and we're happy to oblige them. That's it. I have met the enemy and he is us! I found it very ironic. In effect it is saying we found that digital does not color the sound cause harmonic distortion or intermodulation distortion or phase distortion yet we feel something is missing. Could it be distortion?
|
Sijel
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 487
- Joined: 2009/11/29 21:21:56
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/04 13:15:23
(permalink)
Hey - it's missing the ... "Designed in Germany but using Chinese tubes" button!
Microsoft Surface Book w/ Surface dock, dual 24-inch HD displays, Sonar Platinum, THD 4, GuitarRig, Amplitube, (Kontakt4), Garritan PO, Trillian Bass 1.3, Roland Octa-Capture, Waves Gold & various Waves, PSP and T-Racks plugins.KRK Rokit6, Lefty Guitars & Bass, racks/pedals galore and many other fun things.
|
Sijel
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 487
- Joined: 2009/11/29 21:21:56
- Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?
2010/10/04 13:17:42
(permalink)
Microsoft Surface Book w/ Surface dock, dual 24-inch HD displays, Sonar Platinum, THD 4, GuitarRig, Amplitube, (Kontakt4), Garritan PO, Trillian Bass 1.3, Roland Octa-Capture, Waves Gold & various Waves, PSP and T-Racks plugins.KRK Rokit6, Lefty Guitars & Bass, racks/pedals galore and many other fun things.
|