Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better?

Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Author
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 13:57:46 (permalink)
Karyn


The thing that I don't understand is that back in 'the day' audio gear companies spent millions trying to make their products as good and perfect as possible.  From the early days of hot valves, through noisy transistors to high tech analogue ICs, the ultimate aim was to make the product as perfect as possible.  The more money that was spent, the closer to perfection you got.

Then came digital and 2+2 finally equaled 4 and not 3.9999986 or 4.000024 and suddenly every one wants their mixes to be distorted and imperfect...

Analogue summing can never be called "better" than digital simply because "better" is totaly subjective and can not be measured.
"Different" is the only discriptor that can be used with any acuracy.

Does a grand piano sound "better" or just "different" to an upright piano?
Does a Marshal amp sound "better" or "different" to a Fender?

"Analogue summing sounds DIFFERENT to digital summing"
 
 
The problem was that Analog was too noisy and Digital is too perfect, so we're looking for a middle ground here.  I think it's great that today's technology enables us to get super clean recordings with as much or little flavor of analog as we want, and without the hiss (which was the biggest problem then).  We're also blessed with the ability to have the equivalent of those expensive analog gear in plugin format. 
 
These are great times, my friends :-)

Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz
8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz
ATI Radeon HD 3650
Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64
Cubase 6.03 x64
Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64
RME FireFace 400
Frontier Design Alpha Track
Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus

http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
#61
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 14:36:50 (permalink)
Karyn


 The thing that I don't understand is that back in 'the day' audio gear companies spent millions trying to make their products as good and perfect as possible.  From the early days of hot valves, through noisy transistors to high tech analogue ICs, the ultimate aim was to make the product as perfect as possible.  The more money that was spent, the closer to perfection you got.

I think what happened is that since "perfect" was impossible, the best, most pleasing sounding analog audio designs were developed over time (i.e. the best compromises between different levels and types of noise/distortion/etc.). The "best" of these designs became legendary pieces of gear.

Because they sounded "good" these designs remain desirable, even if "more accurate" modern designs are available.

If you ask what type of summing is most accurate, floating point digital wins hands down by a wide margin (even at 32 bits). But if you ask what "sounds best", YMMV.
#62
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 14:50:00 (permalink)
Going back to Rupert Neve, he spent the years after selling the Neve Co. (Focusrite, Amek) trying to get rid of distortion in his preamps, etc.  He finally made a preamp and circuitry w/ no distortion (he didn't say which unit or Co).  The electrical engineers were amazed but few audio engineers liked.  Whether it is part of pleasing our natural hearing or a learned thing, a little (of the right kind of) distortion is good for recording music.

A lot of the engineerers I've talked w/ like his older stuff because it sounds more colored (whatever you  take that to mean) and his newer stuff is too clean.  W/ the Portico preamp he added a switch to put in some of that "vintage" sound.  Some engineers found that too clean still - one Austin owner operator (and a beta tester for RND) said he only used it when he wanted a clean sound - and that not too often.  Interestingly, the Portico II has double the amount of saturation texture available w/ a second mode, and has a knob to dial in the amount.  You get pretty close in comparision to a new Brent Avril "Neve" clone.  So there is some there, there, as far as pleasing distortion or saturation.  At least for a large segment of the audio engineers.

@

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#63
bunnyfluffer
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 674
  • Joined: 2007/08/11 03:23:57
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 15:41:55 (permalink)
if you want "character" slap one of these on the master buss and be done with it!

http://www.thermioniccult...ts/culture_vulture.htm


post edited by bunnyfluffer - 2010/10/04 15:42:59
#64
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 15:48:02 (permalink)
a little (of the right kind of) distortion is good for recording music.
Sorry that is nonsense.

If it were true then we would prefer all music to have it. Next time you go to a concert of classical music see how much distortion is used.

Best
John
#65
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 17:18:44 (permalink)
bunnyfluffer


if you want "character" slap one of these on the master buss and be done with it!

http://www.thermionicculture.com/products/culture_vulture.htm



 
 
Someone at GearSlutz is replacing that ^ with this:
 
 
 

 
 
 
There are very positive comments about this plugin over there.
 
 

Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz
8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz
ATI Radeon HD 3650
Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64
Cubase 6.03 x64
Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64
RME FireFace 400
Frontier Design Alpha Track
Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus

http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
#66
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13829
  • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 17:30:07 (permalink)
Oh it's nice alright.  It's actually the reason they're making "Juice".  It's capable of warm saturation all the way to thermonuclear destruction...an all points in between.  Just wish they would hurry up and port up to 64 bits.  Sound Toys are still a bit sketchy under Bit or J Bridge.
post edited by yorolpal - 2010/10/04 22:32:54

https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
 
SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
#67
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 18:09:16 (permalink)
Yeah, I can't wait to try Juice.  I've tried their Decapitator plugin on a Drum Bus and REALLY liked what it did to it.  I'm actually thinking about buying their Native bundle, but the little GUI quirks (which are really not showstopper, but can get annoying) are holding me back.  I called them up to report these bugs and they told me that an update was under way and scheduled to be released in the coming weeks.  We'll see.  But other than that, I'm really liking their products.  They are very original stuff, and sound goooood!

Take care!

Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz
8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz
ATI Radeon HD 3650
Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64
Cubase 6.03 x64
Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64
RME FireFace 400
Frontier Design Alpha Track
Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus

http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
#68
bunnyfluffer
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 674
  • Joined: 2007/08/11 03:23:57
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 19:04:18 (permalink)
truth be told my culture vulture is getting less use since I've gotten decapitator... SoundToys are my goto plugins, that and AudioDamage... try Kombinant if you're into distortion effects.



#69
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4397
  • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
  • Location: Orange County, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 19:26:48 (permalink)
Regarding the comments on the Portico series.

I was in a shootout with the following:

Portico 5012
Neve 1073 (New)
Great River 1NV
Daking One

The EQ section of the 1073 was switched out so it was preamp to preamp. The difference between the 1073 and the Portico with the silk switch on was so close, it came down to which vocalist was recording as to which was better. Very little, almost inaudible difference. In fact, across the 4, there was no clear winner. 6 different singers and at times each one was a winner depending on the voice.

I use the 5012 along with a 5043 across the mix buss. Is it better than digital only? Well, it's faster to get results and has better imaging. It does take longer to create the sound I want with digital, but you can get there. So I sum analog. I've done all the plug in tweaking I ever want to do. Anything that makes mixing faster is the direction I am interested in.
post edited by Middleman - 2010/10/04 19:28:14

Gear: A bunch of stuff.
#70
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 21:18:12 (permalink)
bunnyfluffer


truth be told my culture vulture is getting less use since I've gotten decapitator... SoundToys are my goto plugins, that and AudioDamage... try Kombinant if you're into distortion effects.



 
 
Oooh!  Yes I am. 
 
I'll check it out.  I've heard good things about Audio Damage, and their plugins are cheap!
 
Thanks! :-)
 
 

Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz
8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz
ATI Radeon HD 3650
Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64
Cubase 6.03 x64
Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64
RME FireFace 400
Frontier Design Alpha Track
Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus

http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
#71
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13829
  • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/04 22:36:16 (permalink)
Jose7822


Yeah, I can't wait to try Juice.  I've tried their Decapitator plugin on a Drum Bus and REALLY liked what it did to it.  I'm actually thinking about buying their Native bundle, but the little GUI quirks (which are really not showstopper, but can get annoying) are holding me back.  I called them up to report these bugs and they told me that an update was under way and scheduled to be released in the coming weeks.  We'll see.  But other than that, I'm really liking their products.  They are very original stuff, and sound goooood!

Take care!


Yea, I wrote and got an email from Mitch at SoundToys also saying that they were working on porting to 64bit and it was "just a few weeks away" ....waaaaay more than a few weeks ago.  I check their site quite often but so far, no love.  I really like their plugins and hope they get sorted soon.  I've got the Native Bundle and it is indeed KILLER DILLER!

https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
 
SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
#72
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 00:16:49 (permalink)
John



a little (of the right kind of) distortion is good for recording music.
Sorry that is nonsense.

If it were true then we would prefer all music to have it. Next time you go to a concert of classical music see how much distortion is used.
 
John, true, but we aren't, for the most part, talking classical music around here.  Saturation is probably a better term.  I'm not discounting that it is a learned thing from listening to 60s/70s album.  Besides, that is what Rupert Neve says he tried to do w/ his Portico series - put back some of the saturation (or distortion in engineering terms) back into his designs since many people producing music like it.
 
@

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#73
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 00:23:47 (permalink)
yorolpal


Jose7822


Yeah, I can't wait to try Juice.  I've tried their Decapitator plugin on a Drum Bus and REALLY liked what it did to it.  I'm actually thinking about buying their Native bundle, but the little GUI quirks (which are really not showstopper, but can get annoying) are holding me back.  I called them up to report these bugs and they told me that an update was under way and scheduled to be released in the coming weeks.  We'll see.  But other than that, I'm really liking their products.  They are very original stuff, and sound goooood!

Take care!


Yea, I wrote and got an email from Mitch at SoundToys also saying that they were working on porting to 64bit and it was "just a few weeks away" ....waaaaay more than a few weeks ago.  I check their site quite often but so far, no love.  I really like their plugins and hope they get sorted soon.  I've got the Native Bundle and it is indeed KILLER DILLER!

I also asked them about 64 bit and they said that it was ways off.  They mentioned an update for the entire Native Bundle (I believe he said v.4.1) was coming out soon (hopefully fixing the known GUI issues in Sonar 64 bit).  At least that's the scoop from last Friday, when I called.
 
 

Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz
8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz
ATI Radeon HD 3650
Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64
Cubase 6.03 x64
Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64
RME FireFace 400
Frontier Design Alpha Track
Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus

http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
#74
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 01:51:35 (permalink)
John, true, but we aren't, for the most part, talking classical music around here. Saturation is probably a better term. I'm not discounting that it is a learned thing from listening to 60s/70s album. Besides, that is what Rupert Neve says he tried to do w/ his Portico series - put back some of the saturation (or distortion in engineering terms) back into his designs since many people producing music like it.
Maybe he is the problem. LOL BTW the same thing applies to any non amplified music. 

If you have the album of Hendrix doing Voodoo Chile and Stevie Ray Vaughan doing it tell me which sounds better. In the STV version one can hear each pick of the guitar. In the Hendrix version is nothing but a smear of sound. No detail at all. I know this is an extreme example but it is very enlightening. One big reason I abhor any distortion. 

Best
John
#75
DonaldDuck
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 789
  • Joined: 2007/03/14 16:46:29
  • Location: Tha South baby!
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 07:52:07 (permalink)
While "better" is clearly subjective, IMHO, analog mixes are better.  That's why I do them in my studio.  Perhaps we'll have another shootout for fun someday when I get some free time to "play" in the studio.

However, if people know what they are doing, ITB mixes can be quite good.  Sadly, most people are operating a fighter jet with an automobile driver's license when it comes to recording and mixing music.  It's just a disaster.
#76
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 08:08:32 (permalink)
DonaldDuck


While "better" is clearly subjective, IMHO, analog mixes are better.  That's why I do them in my studio.  Perhaps we'll have another shootout for fun someday when I get some free time to "play" in the studio.

However, if people know what they are doing, ITB mixes can be quite good.  Sadly, most people are operating a fighter jet with an automobile driver's license when it comes to recording and mixing music.  It's just a disaster.


In what way do you find them "better"? What do you find them "better " to? I use a digital mixer.

Best
John
#77
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 10:54:34 (permalink)
John, are you saying that Rupert Neve is wrong trying to match the wants of his customers - a majority of just about all professional recording engineers?  ;-)

As far as your "extreme examples" - I guess neither SRV or Jimmy used pedals to add unpleasant distortion or amps which distort and bad-limit.  And a string quartet should only be listened to in an empty field instead of a small wooden chamber to get rid of all those nasty relections which spoil and distort the pure tone of the instruments.

I understand what you are saying - you want no distortion once the sound enters your recording chain.  Fair enough and horses for courses.  But whether it is a learned, cultural thing or an inherent part of human hearing, some people prefer the subtle additions some high-end gear adds to the recording process.  A lot of low budget gear today has better specs than old tube gear, not to mention the high-end gear.  Yet a lot of audio engineers prefer the older tube gear, or solid state, etc.  They aren't wrong, and neither are you.  It is a choice, and nice to have.

@

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#78
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 11:12:03 (permalink)
AT nailed it.

We have the choice of making our recordings with as much or no color at all. 
 
Most people prefer the "analog flavor" though, myself included (and I'm not from the Vinyl generation by the way).


Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz
8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz
ATI Radeon HD 3650
Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64
Cubase 6.03 x64
Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64
RME FireFace 400
Frontier Design Alpha Track
Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus

http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
#79
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13829
  • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 13:11:19 (permalink)
As I've mentioned to John before (and if we're bringing up totally "subjective" therefore meaningless comparisons) I don't think The Trashmen's version of Louie Louie would have been a hit at all if you could understand the lyrics clearly or the instruments were not horribly distorted.  That would be akin to saying one preferred Pat Boone's version of Long Tall Sally over Little Richard's.  Which, of course, would be CRAAAAAAAAZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
 
SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
#80
DonaldDuck
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 789
  • Joined: 2007/03/14 16:46:29
  • Location: Tha South baby!
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 20:32:06 (permalink)
John


DonaldDuck


While "better" is clearly subjective, IMHO, analog mixes are better.  That's why I do them in my studio.  Perhaps we'll have another shootout for fun someday when I get some free time to "play" in the studio.

However, if people know what they are doing, ITB mixes can be quite good.  Sadly, most people are operating a fighter jet with an automobile driver's license when it comes to recording and mixing music.  It's just a disaster.


In what way do you find them "better"? What do you find them "better " to? I use a digital mixer.
It's alot like trying to explain while I like a certain painting or vaction spot or why I like my Mom's biscuits and gravy more than any restaurant.  There is no definite reason. I just do.
 
Since everyone's brain processes sound a little differently, you may hear different things than I hear.  Further, even if we hear the same thing, then you simply may not like what I like. With that being said, using analog mixing sounds more "real", less digital, more punchy, and less "processed" (sterile) sounding. When we move back into the analog world, we get back our true "headroom" unlike the faux headroom in digital.  We can actually mix things alot louder. 
 
It's a common problem with in the box mixes that the "rendered" file doesn't sound exactly like the playback while mixing the tracks.  There are many reasons for this.  However, with analog mixing, what I hear while mixing is EXACTLY what it sounds like when I mix down to my stereo mix. 
 
But, alas, it is all subjective. 
#81
BRainbow
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 399
  • Joined: 2004/03/14 01:39:12
  • Location: Honolulu, Hawai'i
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 21:12:46 (permalink)
John said:

In the Hendrix version is nothing but a smear of sound. No detail at all. I know this is an extreme example but it is very enlightening. One big reason I abhor any distortion. 


John, are you saying you abhor distorted guitar as a genre or are you saying you abhor distortion in the recordings themselves?  I agree that the earlier Hendrix recordings leave a lot to be desired, but that is a not the same as a relatively clean recording of a distorted guitar.  Just wondering?

Cakewalk (forever), Two WIN10 64-bit DAWs: home-brew ASRock x299 Taichi / i7 7820x w/ 64GB RAM and ASUS X99A-II / i7-5820K w/ 32GB RAM, ZOOM UAC 8, Mackie ONYX 1640i FW Mixer/Interface, Mackie ONYX 1200F, Avalon U5 PreAmp, NI Komplete 11 Ultimate, EastWest Composer CloudX, Yamaha MOTIF XS8, Ensoniq SD-1 and ESQ-1, Korg M1rEX, Yamaha TX-81Z, Roland D110, Line6 HELIX Rack and Native, POD HD-Pro, POD Farm 2.5, Yamaha NS-10 and Presonus Eris E8 monitors, Yamaha Disklavier Upright Piano, mics, guitars, basses, and the cutest little tambourine.
#82
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13829
  • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/05 21:19:21 (permalink)
I don't wish to speak for John but I think he actually meant the latter.  I think he is speaking more about the distortion in the recordings themselves and not the individual, purposeful distortions that (like AT refered to above) almost evey musician in one way or another applies to his or her sound.  But best let John speak for himself here.  Sorry for nosing in.

https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
 
SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
#83
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/06 03:31:36 (permalink)
I don't wish to speak for John but I think he actually meant the latter. I think he is speaking more about the distortion in the recordings themselves and not the individual, purposeful distortions that (like AT refered to above) almost evey musician in one way or another applies to his or her sound. But best let John speak for himself here. Sorry for nosing in.
Thanks Ol Pal you have it spot on.

Best
John
#84
Karyn
Ma-Ma
  • Total Posts : 9200
  • Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
  • Location: Lincoln, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/06 08:16:48 (permalink)
DonaldDuck


It's a common problem with in the box mixes that the "rendered" file doesn't sound exactly like the playback while mixing the tracks.  There are many reasons for this.  However, with analog mixing, what I hear while mixing is EXACTLY what it sounds like when I mix down to my stereo mix. 
 
But, alas, it is all subjective. 
Actually there is just one reason for this, and it can be turned off.  It's down to the quality settings in the synths/sample players/FX you are using.  To get real time playback on low spec systems (read pre-i7/i5) most modules have a low/high quality switch to cut down on CPU/RAM use.  Guitar Rig has a High Q switch in the top of the gui, BFD has a setting in prefferences that limits the range of samples used for real time tracking, even Audio Snap and V-Vocal use quick renders for tracking/mixing and then produce a high quality version for the final off-line render, this is the extra processing steps you often see when producing a final render.
 
If your machine is powerfull enough you can run everything at high quality all the time. If your machine can't handle that, then you can still bounce tracks to audio at high quality and use those.  Your final render will sound exactly the same as your mix.
 
If you're mixing in analogue by sending stems out from Sonar using multiple outputs then what you're hearing is the low quality versions intended for real time listening, unless you manualy set everything to high Q as above.
 
As for "pure" analogue mixing, you will never ever get what you hear recorded to your master tape/dat/cd/hdd.
The output from the summing amps in your mixer get split between the monitor send (another amp) and the line out to tape (another amp), so the signal going to your monitors is NOT what you are recording to Master. Then when you play back the signal first goes through yet another set of amps (the output stage of your tape/cd/dat machine and the input amp of your desk) before going to your monitors. So it can NEVER sound the same as you heard while mixing.
 
Mixing in the box (assuming High Q settings as above) the output data stream is sent to your audio card for monitoring and THE SAME data stream gets saved to disk as your master file.
When playing back the master file, the SAME DATA STREAM is sent to the SAME SOUND CARD with no extra processing and thus you hear exatly what you recorded.

Mekashi Futo
Get 10% off all Waves plugins.
Current DAW.  i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum

#85
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/06 08:23:39 (permalink)
Nice post Karyn.

Its funny I found that odd too about "exactly what I hear". I have always heard what I mix as the same as the mixed stereo file with digital.

Best
John
#86
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/06 09:05:06 (permalink)
It's a common problem with in the box mixes that the "rendered" file doesn't sound exactly like the playback while mixing the tracks



Interesting.

My rendered 2 tracks sound EXACTLY the same as the raw "multitrack"

And they all translate quite well across differing playback systems.

I don't think the "problem" is as "common" as some people are suggesting.

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#87
DonaldDuck
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 789
  • Joined: 2007/03/14 16:46:29
  • Location: Tha South baby!
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/06 11:54:13 (permalink)
Karyn


DonaldDuck


It's a common problem with in the box mixes that the "rendered" file doesn't sound exactly like the playback while mixing the tracks.  There are many reasons for this.  However, with analog mixing, what I hear while mixing is EXACTLY what it sounds like when I mix down to my stereo mix. 
 
But, alas, it is all subjective. 
Actually there is just one reason for this, and it can be turned off.  It's down to the quality settings in the synths/sample players/FX you are using.  To get real time playback on low spec systems (read pre-i7/i5) most modules have a low/high quality switch to cut down on CPU/RAM use.  Guitar Rig has a High Q switch in the top of the gui, BFD has a setting in prefferences that limits the range of samples used for real time tracking, even Audio Snap and V-Vocal use quick renders for tracking/mixing and then produce a high quality version for the final off-line render, this is the extra processing steps you often see when producing a final render.
 
If your machine is powerfull enough you can run everything at high quality all the time. If your machine can't handle that, then you can still bounce tracks to audio at high quality and use those.  Your final render will sound exactly the same as your mix.
 
If you're mixing in analogue by sending stems out from Sonar using multiple outputs then what you're hearing is the low quality versions intended for real time listening, unless you manualy set everything to high Q as above.
 
As for "pure" analogue mixing, you will never ever get what you hear recorded to your master tape/dat/cd/hdd.
The output from the summing amps in your mixer get split between the monitor send (another amp) and the line out to tape (another amp), so the signal going to your monitors is NOT what you are recording to Master. Then when you play back the signal first goes through yet another set of amps (the output stage of your tape/cd/dat machine and the input amp of your desk) before going to your monitors. So it can NEVER sound the same as you heard while mixing.
 
Mixing in the box (assuming High Q settings as above) the output data stream is sent to your audio card for monitoring and THE SAME data stream gets saved to disk as your master file.
When playing back the master file, the SAME DATA STREAM is sent to the SAME SOUND CARD with no extra processing and thus you hear exatly what you recorded.

Actually, no.  The main problem is the mathematical limitation of digital audio.
#88
Karyn
Ma-Ma
  • Total Posts : 9200
  • Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
  • Location: Lincoln, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/06 12:03:37 (permalink)
ok, I'll bite...  What limitations are we talking about here? 64bit sampling @1024k samples not good enough?

At the end of the day, what you're hearing when you mix "in the box" is the same data stream that gets recorded and is the same data stream that you then hear on playback. It sounds and is the same whatever math system you use.

Mekashi Futo
Get 10% off all Waves plugins.
Current DAW.  i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum

#89
DonaldDuck
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 789
  • Joined: 2007/03/14 16:46:29
  • Location: Tha South baby!
  • Status: offline
Re:Does an analog summing mixer really make mixes sound better? 2010/10/06 12:12:44 (permalink)
Karyn


ok, I'll bite...  What limitations are we talking about here? 64bit sampling @1024k samples not good enough?

At the end of the day, what you're hearing when you mix "in the box" is the same data stream that gets recorded and is the same data stream that you then hear on playback. It sounds and is the same whatever math system you use.


I'm not going to argue as I don't really care enough to argue... but there are numerous posts on this forum about rendered track not sounding the same...  Either way, I just think it sounds better to mix "out of the box" minus the not sounding the same issue.  Are you going to attack a subject opinion too?
#90
Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1