Helpful ReplyDorchester much more unstable than Cambridge.

Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Author
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4294
  • Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/04 23:34:05 (permalink)
mettelus
One thing I have notice with SPlat is the "not responding" in the title bar. I have seen this in screen captures of people's issues as well. Once SONAR has been run once, I do not see a notable difference between X3 and SPlat, but that "not responding" part of SPlat's initial startup bothers me. I am not sure why this occurs though.



Nothing to worry about, Sonar though should be polling Windows by some method to tell it that it is still alive however... Windows just thinks it's dead when in fact it's just processing.
#61
Larry Jones
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 834
  • Joined: 2007/10/11 02:45:33
  • Location: Southern California
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/04 23:35:32 (permalink)
joden
That is because of windows pre-fetch, not sonar ;)
 

I'm aware of that. It doesn't really matter, as the important metric (IMO) is how long it takes to start the first time. Although when I actually had a commercial operation I never had an "emergency" wherein startup time made a difference. I was always in the studio for a while before the client, making sure everything was ready

SONAR Platinum 2017.10 • CbB  Win10 • i7/2600 • 16GB RAM • Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 • NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS
#62
joden
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1263
  • Joined: 2007/09/22 17:03:46
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 00:20:18 (permalink)
Larry Jones
joden
That is because of windows pre-fetch, not sonar ;)
 

....as the important metric (IMO) is how long it takes to start the first time. 



Yep agree totally :)
#63
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5139
  • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
  • Location: Ballarat, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 01:21:56 (permalink)
I know this is not so relevant especially comparing bootup times between Studio One say and Sonar because they are different.  I am sure Sonar might need more time as it has much more to boot up I guess.
 
But on my older machine (XP) normal drive and all, Studio One takes 54 seconds to bootup and be ready to go. On the new Win 7 machine with the SSD it is only 8 seconds!
 
In both cases here both programs are identical in terms of their versions and content etc..Just goes to show how quick the SSD must be.
 
I agree with Larry though, I like to be here early too before the client gets here as well.

Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
 
Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
#64
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 01:31:13 (permalink)
In post 4 I described my experience as being "glitchy". Maybe twitchy would be better. I hadn't been having crashes or not responding issues so there were no problem reporter instances to follow through and nothing repeatable by a fixed recipe.
I had been using the Windows Ease of Access setting where hovering the mouse over a window activates it.
I've now turned it off and it seems to have made a difference for the better. I can sort of understand why that may be the case but I'll just continue to work with Dorchester and see and report any findings.
 

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#65
LJB
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1502
  • Joined: 2009/07/29 10:31:31
  • Location: South Africa
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 02:20:52 (permalink)
joden
LJB
......... as an 8+ hour per day, 7 days a week professional user of Sonar Platinum ..............


OT, but how do you do that? I struggle to get through two hours without severe brain fade. 
 
PS: It is a serious question LJB, I am not trying to be a smartarse.....



Joden, it's the same as any other day-job, except this one requires creativity and lots of concentration. I suppose it's a skill one learns. I often have 4 or 5 guys in the studio and you have to learn how to manage them as well as the session. It's exhausting for the first few years but it's a rhythm - you learn to take mini breaks by insisting on making everyone coffee so you can stretch your legs.. that sort of thing :O) Better than pushing a pencil for a whole day..

Ludwig Bouwer, One Big Room Studios.
--------------------
Cakewalk
with all the trimmings / Win 10Pro 64 / Intel i7-7700 / Asus Prime Z270k / 16GB DDR4 / RME HDSP9652 / RME UFX / Black Lion Audio ADA8000 / ART MPA & ART Pro Channel / Focusrite Voicemaster Pro / Aphex 107

Check out my work at www.onebigroom.co.za

#66
joden
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1263
  • Joined: 2007/09/22 17:03:46
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 02:37:38 (permalink)
mettelus
One thing I have notice with SPlat is the "not responding" in the title bar. I have seen this in screen captures of people's issues as well. Once SONAR has been run once, I do not see a notable difference between X3 and SPlat, but that "not responding" part of SPlat's initial startup bothers me. I am not sure why this occurs though.


Again this is a windows thing. If a program/app/plugin seems "to windows" to be taking a bit too long to load it posts up the not responding message.
#67
Fabio Rubato
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 500
  • Joined: 2006/09/01 21:51:29
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 03:46:30 (permalink)
LJB
Example: The project I JUST opened - flatlined EQs and Zeroed compressors in PC..
 
Never mind, can't get it to paste and upload.


Just experienced this too. Flatlined my EQ's after spending all day setting them up. Loaded the same project in X3e and back to my settings - didn't check comps though.

Sonar: Platinum, (X3e) - x64 
PC: Win10 Pro 64;
Computer: Gigabyte Z68X-UD3R-B3; Intel i7, 2600k @ 4.2 (8 Cores); 16 GB Corsair Ram;
Visual Card: Gigabyte GTX 580;
Audio Interface: RME UFX;
Monitors: Adam A77X, Sub8;
Midi Controllers: Komplete Kontrol S88,  Novation Bass Station 2; NI Maschine Mk 2; 
Other Hardware: Joe Meek Twin Q Dual Studio Channel;
Mics: RODE NT2-A, ASTON Spirit 
 
Latest Song: Lay Down Before the War

#68
Fabio Rubato
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 500
  • Joined: 2006/09/01 21:51:29
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 03:49:01 (permalink)
stickman393
Dorchester has been pretty stable for me. No complaints here. 
 
I think it's funny to hear people describe previous releases as "crisp and snappy" when compared to the current version. Every damn' release you hear the same story. X3 was slow and bloated compared to X2, etc etc. 90% psychological, in my opinion. 


X3e continued to be 'crisp and snappy' here whilst Plt is slow and bloated on my system and there's nothing 'psychological' about my experience.

Sonar: Platinum, (X3e) - x64 
PC: Win10 Pro 64;
Computer: Gigabyte Z68X-UD3R-B3; Intel i7, 2600k @ 4.2 (8 Cores); 16 GB Corsair Ram;
Visual Card: Gigabyte GTX 580;
Audio Interface: RME UFX;
Monitors: Adam A77X, Sub8;
Midi Controllers: Komplete Kontrol S88,  Novation Bass Station 2; NI Maschine Mk 2; 
Other Hardware: Joe Meek Twin Q Dual Studio Channel;
Mics: RODE NT2-A, ASTON Spirit 
 
Latest Song: Lay Down Before the War

#69
Fabio Rubato
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 500
  • Joined: 2006/09/01 21:51:29
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 03:53:23 (permalink)
bitman
Can we call it Dorkchester now then?
I've been wanting to so badly because I guess I must be so immature. :-)


yes lets!

Sonar: Platinum, (X3e) - x64 
PC: Win10 Pro 64;
Computer: Gigabyte Z68X-UD3R-B3; Intel i7, 2600k @ 4.2 (8 Cores); 16 GB Corsair Ram;
Visual Card: Gigabyte GTX 580;
Audio Interface: RME UFX;
Monitors: Adam A77X, Sub8;
Midi Controllers: Komplete Kontrol S88,  Novation Bass Station 2; NI Maschine Mk 2; 
Other Hardware: Joe Meek Twin Q Dual Studio Channel;
Mics: RODE NT2-A, ASTON Spirit 
 
Latest Song: Lay Down Before the War

#70
Fabio Rubato
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 500
  • Joined: 2006/09/01 21:51:29
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 03:56:03 (permalink)
Keni
Whew!

Nice to have projects of that sort on a machine well setup...

Are they mostly audio recordings or do they contain many soft synths and the like...

I notice that projects using all audio load fast (especially if the waveforms are current in the folder) no matter how many 64bit vst's I use (eq/comp/etc), but as soon as I start adding softsynths (even frozen), the load times increase dramatically...

Keni

Yes, I've noticed this as well.
post edited by Fabio Rubato - 2015/05/05 04:10:53

Sonar: Platinum, (X3e) - x64 
PC: Win10 Pro 64;
Computer: Gigabyte Z68X-UD3R-B3; Intel i7, 2600k @ 4.2 (8 Cores); 16 GB Corsair Ram;
Visual Card: Gigabyte GTX 580;
Audio Interface: RME UFX;
Monitors: Adam A77X, Sub8;
Midi Controllers: Komplete Kontrol S88,  Novation Bass Station 2; NI Maschine Mk 2; 
Other Hardware: Joe Meek Twin Q Dual Studio Channel;
Mics: RODE NT2-A, ASTON Spirit 
 
Latest Song: Lay Down Before the War

#71
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 04:04:20 (permalink)
I seem to have found my fix. As per post 65.
After 2 hours of continued use I seem to have hit on what's been causing all my weird screen things as none have reoccurred. Just shows how careful to be when changing seemingly simple defaults on Windows can cause problems. I remember I made that change as a trial just before Dorchester came out.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#72
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8124
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:43:11
  • Location: Missouri - USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 07:51:25 (permalink)
mudgel
I seem to have found my fix. As per post 65.
After 2 hours of continued use I seem to have hit on what's been causing all my weird screen things as none have reoccurred. Just shows how careful to be when changing seemingly simple defaults on Windows can cause problems. I remember I made that change as a trial just before Dorchester came out.



*Somebody* at the Bakery should capture what you've uncovered for a "Things to check FAQ" ...

Bob  --
Angels are crying because truth has died ...
Illegitimi non carborundum
--
Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64
Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s 
Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U

#73
KPerry
Max Output Level: -44 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3120
  • Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:15
  • Location: London, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 08:21:55 (permalink)
Did you also know (as I found out last week!) that the Ease of Access setting "Prevent windows from being automatically arranged when moved to the edge of the screen" affects SONAR behaviour too?  The default (unchecked) stops SONAR from remembering its size stretched across two desktops...so uncheck it for SONAR to remember window sizes properly (it also causes problems with IE and Live Mail, both of which are written by, oh, yes, Microsoft :-)).
#74
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 08:25:34 (permalink)
Now that you mention it, when I changed my mouse hover behavior I also checked that box. I must go back and uncheck it. Doh!

Seems like that might be a good troubleshooting tip for the folks that have these glitchy seemingly non specific window issues.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#75
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 09:16:03 (permalink)
mudgel
Seems like that might be a good troubleshooting tip for the folks that have these glitchy seemingly non specific window issues.



How true, and they'll know it only if they look at this thread...I think BobF's idea of a "things to check" doc is a very good one so observations like your get captured.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#76
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 09:45:55 (permalink)
Anderton
mudgel
Seems like that might be a good troubleshooting tip for the folks that have these glitchy seemingly non specific window issues.



How true, and they'll know it only if they look at this thread...I think BobF's idea of a "things to check" doc is a very good one so observations like your get captured.

To whom could we send this info, so it might be included in a FAQ if it can be verified as being generally true, not just on my system? Currently I don't seem to have access to PM any of the Cakewalk staff. Even if we could make a sticky thread to which we could add I think over a period of time it could become unwieldy.
The idea is great, how to implement it is another. It would need some Cakewalk involvement. Maybe a troubleshooting Windows tips for Sonar in the FAQs

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#77
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3249
  • Joined: 2015/01/17 03:52:50
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 10:10:48 (permalink)
Anderton
mudgel
Seems like that might be a good troubleshooting tip for the folks that have these glitchy seemingly non specific window issues.

How true, and they'll know it only if they look at this thread...I think BobF's idea of a "things to check" doc is a very good one so observations like your get captured.

forum users have been suggesting for literally years that there should be a faq covering the usual things - defrag,  vst scan, disable av, etc etc, asio4all, etc, so personally i'm not getting my hopes up that this will ever materialise in any official form... but hey, prove me wrong!

just a sec

#78
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 10:20:34 (permalink)
Yes, please. We definitely could use a DEFINITIVE troubleshooting guide geared SPECIFICALLY for Sonar. Preferably one that even breaks down into common hardware/system configs with sections regarding common plugins and other programs people may have installed (like Anti Viruses or other programs that may disrupt audio streaming).
 
Commission Mr. Roseberry to work with Cake tech support to compile the first edition and make it a living document that gets updated online as the program evolves and new issues/conflicts arise.
 
It could end up being a massive document but it would sure as heck beat having to hunt and peck around the Googles or asking the forum. It would save everyone time and angst and likely reduce the tech support budget so those fellows could focus on more future positive projects.
 
It is quite apparent that the old Sweetwater and other optimization guides are woefully outdated at this point and many of those tweaks do not apply to Sonar (or make things worse).
 
Craig, you have the Baker's ears more than the rest of us. Perhaps if you post a thread asking for user input here and set up some kind of meeting with the appropriate folks to see the viability of such an effort we can get this happening.
 
Heck, I would even pay a modest amount for such a document (like $20). That could be used to pay Mr. Roseberry for his input.
 
Cheers.
 
PS: Also a section on proper data/disk management would be excellent. As in the best way to set up drive configs laid out in plain english as well as ways to CORRECT or reconfig data paths for best performance (in case people add drives or are like me and borked up their paths from the get go). scook seems to know a lot about this so getting him involved would be good too but I would also like Jim's input as well. I'd say 90% of the issues I have are likely related to my HDD set up.
post edited by Beepster - 2015/05/05 10:29:08
#79
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8124
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:43:11
  • Location: Missouri - USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 10:22:34 (permalink)
EDIT:  Please don't reply here about the FAQ idea.  I'll start a separate, focused thread to see where it goes.
 
I don't remember the exact dates, but sometime in the '00 - '03 I maintained a user contributed FAQ that I updated and sent to *somebody* at Cakewalk that they in turn posted.
 
Around the time of the shift from nntp to forums that all changed ... PA9 to early Sonar time-frame, IIRC.
 
It was something I created on my own and posted in the newsgroup.  I don't think it would be terribly difficult to create/maintain/periodically post updates here.  The biggest challenge to the maintainer is dealing with people not liking the decisions on inclusion of items, dealing with attributions, etc.  IOW, dealing with people
 
post edited by BobF - 2015/05/05 10:32:20

Bob  --
Angels are crying because truth has died ...
Illegitimi non carborundum
--
Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64
Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s 
Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U

#80
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 10:28:22 (permalink)
BobF
I don't remember the exact dates, but sometime in the '00 - '03 I maintained a user contributed FAQ that I updated and sent to *somebody* at Cakewalk that they in turn posted.
 
Around the time of the shift from nntp to forums that all changed ... PA9 to early Sonar time-frame, IIRC.
 
It was something I created on my own and posted in the newsgroup.  I don't think it would be terribly difficult to create/maintain/periodically post updates here.  The biggest challenge to the maintainer is dealing with people not liking the decisions on inclusion of items, dealing with attributions, etc.  IOW, dealing with people
 




Can't please everyone all of the time but for those of us willing to do the reading and effort it would be a massive boon. Despite some of the... erm... angstier folks I think us Sonarites are a pretty hearty, DIY, "stick to it until it obeys" bunch of weirdos. ;-)
#81
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8124
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:43:11
  • Location: Missouri - USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 10:36:32 (permalink)
Beepster
BobF
I don't remember the exact dates, but sometime in the '00 - '03 I maintained a user contributed FAQ that I updated and sent to *somebody* at Cakewalk that they in turn posted.
 
Around the time of the shift from nntp to forums that all changed ... PA9 to early Sonar time-frame, IIRC.
 
It was something I created on my own and posted in the newsgroup.  I don't think it would be terribly difficult to create/maintain/periodically post updates here.  The biggest challenge to the maintainer is dealing with people not liking the decisions on inclusion of items, dealing with attributions, etc.  IOW, dealing with people
 




Can't please everyone all of the time but for those of us willing to do the reading and effort it would be a massive boon. Despite some of the... erm... angstier folks I think us Sonarites are a pretty hearty, DIY, "stick to it until it obeys" bunch of weirdos. ;-)




hehe ... I hear ya' ... Let's move the FAQ discussion to ---> http://forum.cakewalk.com/FindPost/3217055

Bob  --
Angels are crying because truth has died ...
Illegitimi non carborundum
--
Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64
Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s 
Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U

#82
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 10:41:06 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby pwalpwal 2015/05/05 11:03:09
And really, based on my constant scouring of this place, a good place to start would be with...
 
ASUS and Gigabyte MOBOs (so whatever BIOS/Utility/connectivity/chipset stuff that goes with that)
 
Focusrite, RME, PreSonus and Roland QuadCap interfaces (and their drivers)
 
Win7, 8 and soon 10 optimization tweaks (obviously)
 
Third party plugs (Waves, Izotope, Steinberg, IK, XLN, FXpansion)
 
AVs (Microsoft Security Essentials, AVAST, Kapersky... and really if you are using anything else you probably should switch IMO) and extras like CCleaner, Malwarebytes, Spybot S&D... all of which have settings that cause automatic thingies to happen that may interrupt data flow.
 
Common apps like Office, web browsers, flash players, etc that may call home or do weird stuff on startup.
 
Just some thoughts based on observations of our user base.
#83
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 10:43:27 (permalink)
I actually need to get back to "work" on my current project but I'll pop over to see what's the what.
 
Eventually we should make it a group feature request but after it's had time to simmer here in the Sonar forum.
 
Cheers.
 
#84
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 11:00:08 (permalink)
I all for a FAQ for trouble shooting. If I can help let me know. 

Best
John
#85
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 11:00:13 (permalink)
Hey beep, what time is it where you are. It's 1am here Eastern Standard time Australia.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#86
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 11:33:12 (permalink)
Hiya Mike. 11:30am as of this post. I like to get more dry/complex tasks that require lucidity done in the morning (I'm currently exporting some session work... woot!) and then I can go all Mr. Flaky artsy/pontification guy as the day presses on and my mind "wanders".
 
lol
 
Hope you are well. Cheers.
#87
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 11:34:26 (permalink)
And yeah... we are almost on exact opposite sides of the globe talking in real time for essentially "free". Freaky, eh? Gotta love the intertubes.
 
;-)
 
#88
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 11:44:15 (permalink)
John
I all for a FAQ for trouble shooting. If I can help let me know. 




This gives me an idea. Since we, the userbase, have a wide spectrum of configs perhaps Cake could put out a survey designed specifically to a) figure out the most commonly used setups, b) ask about what issues everyone experiences (and what they don't), c) cross reference it all to see if any patterns appear and finally d) use that info to create the tech manual.
 
Also leave a "notes" section so people can describe problems they've had and how they resolved them so they can test them in house and figure out if there a holes that could be plugged in the program and/or test these solutions in house to see if they are good and solid tweaks to advise to other users.
 
Just brainstorming... this should probably go in a dedicated thread. If I am too lazy or distracted to do it people can cut/paste any of my suggestions in any "official" or grassroots threads on the subject.
 
Sorry but I really do have a lot of insane crap going on right now otherwise I'd be more vigilant. THis is a VERY good idea and I'm glad it is being discussed.
 
Cheers.
#89
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Dorchester much more unstable than Cambridge. 2015/05/05 11:48:07 (permalink)
Even better... maybe have an alert system based on user input on their configs so if system specific issues are found they can receive preemptive advice via email.
 
Like let's say somehow they find something screwy going on with Focusrite drivers they could email me with a link to an entry in the "living" tech doc detailing the issue and possible solutions or a request to test on my own system.
 
Lofty goal but damn would that just kick every other DAW company's ARSE.
 
Yeah baby!
 
#90
Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1