Feature Requests (View List n Submit)

Page: 12345.. > >> Showing page 1 of 7
Author
SongCraft
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3902
  • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
  • Status: offline
2009/02/25 07:57:33 (permalink)

Feature Requests (View List n Submit)

Yeah I know, it's another wish list thread but what the heck. I wanted a more in depth discussion to weigh up what we all want most and hope others will contribute to this thread in a positive way. Thanks.

More workspace, enhanced workflow and technical assist for SONAR to help (especially newbies) ensure their system is setup/configured correctly.

Also, I would like to see CW continue to improve the stability of SONAR and to reduce the developers work by reducing the SONAR series (Editions) and basically keeping them all with the same GUI and core functionalities. And after reading several threads about P.5 into SONAR I think a few goodies from P.5 included would be OK.

Here are my suggestions and most of them are NOT my own ideas (when I say "New" I don't literally mean it NEW only that it would be new for SONAR). Also, some of the following ideas are from other DAW's. I don't expect everyone to agree with what I suggest for FR but FWIW here goes....




New Track View:
3 Quick View Modes by k/b commands or by double-clicking color side-bar (new), that toggles between (1)-Full View, (2)-Mid-View, (3)-Ultra-Compact View.

Ability to Adjust Pan and Volume controls directly on the numeric display > see pic displaying displays in green = pan) and vol = blue.

Right-Clicking on Color Side-Bar opens options to color gradient pallet for quick n easy changes (inlcu' presets and user-presets). Gradient Color-Bars are designed to take up less space as an alternative option to Track Icons.


------------------------------------------------------------------------




New Envelope Enhancements including New Nodes:
For anyone new to SONAR a Envelope Tool-Bar that also includes Off-Set (O = on/off) and Properties (P). Properties - Options to setup default settings for nodes. * more on this later.

Including the ability to select one or more tracks and simply click a node or right-click on clip or use k/b short-cut commands to insert nodes (envelope)



New Node-Shapes and depending on zoom-level the Nodes will increase in size as you zoom in making it easier to click-n-edit.

New Envelope Nodes added...

- Character Node - which is like a Transient Shaper and BBE combined! For example: the ability to add definition anywhere in a track, or reduce harsh transients anywhere in a track.

- Noise Removal Node - that can clean up tracks with ease! Remove guitar hum, buzz, noises

- Peak Node - pinpoint accuracy on peaks with the option of using just one node....

....Singular Mode: the ability to use just one Env Node, thereby making it much more easier and faster to work with envelopes. More accuracy! Pinpoint precision edits. Includes Time Range defined by milliseconds, seconds, minutes, bars or measures. Including various curve options.

* All nodes can be setup with default options in Envelope Properties including time-range.

------------------------------------------------------



New Clips View:
Transparent background with black border edges, colored wavs (foreground). And as usual with SONAR the view (colors) are fully customizable, don't like the dark-gray background? change it to whatever color you prefer. Don't like the pascal wav colors? change them all to whatever color you prefer. Just as you can do now with SONAR. :-)

A timeline or should I say, Tick-Line (no numeric values, since those values can be seen on the main timeline and because it would take up more space adding those numeric values) runs between all clips making it easier to do precision edits. See pic

Having a transparent background gives the clips a clearer, neater appearance without the need of unsightly vertical lines. Reducing eye-strain.

--------------------------------

New Audio-Snap Editor (ASE):
Looks very much like the current PRV except you're editing audio real easy like you would edit midi, yes it's much like using Melodyne. This is a feature request I submitted long before Cubase.5 was release with their version of VariAudio.

By integrating V-Vocal and Audio-Snap features into the one editor (Audio-Snap-Editor). For example: ability to ctrl+A then quantize, correct pitch and/or transpose. Easy and Advance editing such as being able to micro-edit pitch, and/or move timing slightly ahead or behind the beat. Add Swing or copy timing from existing track then apply, and with the option to save custom presets.

Having the ability to transpose would be awesome for creating harmonies. Copy/Paste section(s) or the entire clip then select and drag up/down to another key range. Done. Thus the new Audio-Snap Editor is fully polyphonic. Ability to edit mono or polyphonic material.



Enhanced PRV and Audio-Snap Editors: (See Pic)
The piano graphic should be much narrower! Currently IMHO I think it's way too wide, sure we can grab it and narrow the darn thing but for crying out loud it should be narrower by default and it can look a bit nicer too. The reason being... better appearance and more workspace.

--------------------------------------------------



New Tab-Selection Bar:
Especially to help Newbies! Displaying various buttons to switch from different views: Track, Main Mixer, Mixer Only, Busses Only, Audio Snap Editor, PRV, MusicStaff, Customize. (see pic)

The New GUI new Tab Selection View (like the tabs currently already used in SONAR) But these tabs makes it easier for newbies to navigate various views (or via keyboard shortcuts for us experienced users) and by default when you hover over any of the tabs there's a roll-over keyboard shortcut info that tells you what the keyboard shortcut is (this hover option can be turned off).

The tabs are positioned on the lower bottom border of the main workspace windows, Options to move the Tabs Navigation Bar above in the main menu bar up top OR remove the Tab

Navigation Bar entirely from the workspace but still being able to access via keyboard shortcuts.

--------------------------------------------------

New Technical Assist:
A program (optional separate application especially handy for newbies) specifically for

Cakewalk DAW products that scans for issues and assist with plugins, audio, midi, controllers setups and troubleshooting.

Log Report with additional option for direct Email to Cakewalk Technical Support.

Diagnostics Scan specifically designed to ensure SONAR DAW apps are installed correctly and kept in excellent condition and includes clean up tools to remove unused files from within the new Technical Assist program.

Technical Assist is like having your own personal technical support and is especially ideal for users who are new to SONAR and needs assistance in setting up and troubleshooting.

Help Assistant that displays clear diagrams with step by step guides and recommendations to help assist in setting up audio, midi controllers and ACT.

Searchable Assistant also includes direct accessed to SONAR operations help manual.

Therefor once Technical Assist is installed it will overwrite and install an update for SONAR help operations manual which can then be accessed via the new Technical Assist program.

----------------------------------------

Perfect Sampler and Perfect Drummer (New SoftSynths):
Integrate all the Best of CW Softsynths into a new all in one Mega-Sampler which I'll dub the Perfect Sampler.....

with the ability to load any file format, up to 64 chn mixer (i/o) with multi-effects directly accessible in Perfect Sampler. Inlcu' separate outputs (various options).

Content sound library manager browser with search fully integrated in the Perfect Sampler (no separate popup window).

Ability to layer sounds (by assigning same midi channel). Advanced and Easy modes for editing sounds (ADSR, Filters, Env, LFO and Velocity) Onboard fully customizable and flexible Arpeggiator.

Perfect Sampler content sound library consisting of the best sounds from Rapture and Dimension Pro plus Roland Juno, GrooveSynth and Fantom. Larger sound library for Producer Edition including incredibly realistic rock guitar + bass sounds that includes amp and speak simulators effects (extra FX additions for Producer Edition)

---------------->

New Perfect-Drummer same GUI design as Session Drummer2 but vastly improved: 24 pads, the usual tuning and width controls. Tab Interface options such as: 24 channel Mixer (24 i/o), multi-effects (that includes the mighty Transient Shaper) all directly accessible within the Perfect Drummer GUI (8 effects inserts per channel). Inlcu' separate outputs (various options)

Content sound library manager browser with search that is fully integrated in the Perfect Drummer GUI (no separate popup window). Ability to layer sounds (simply by assigning same midi channel). Advanced and Easy modes for editing sounds (ADSR filters, Env, LFO and Velocity controls)

Onboard fully customizable Arpeggiator and the new Perfect Beat Creator fully integrated into Perfect Drummer. The new Perfect Beat Creator is like having a smart drummer onboard that turns a few hits into a complete midi-drum pattern (per-measure of either 2, 4, 8, or specify user amount in options inclu' key signature), save user-presets settings. Other tools in Perfect Beat Creator includes various swings, grooves, time signatures, intros, fills and breaks. Beats created are in perfect sync to the current project tempo automatically.

Large content sound library include all the classic Roland TR-series, 808, 707, 909. Also include new better sounding rides, cymbals and accoustic kits. Add more percussion sounds including world/ethnic and other sounds such as one shot vocals and movie-FX. Include a much larger sound and midi pattern library for Producer Edition.

-------------------------------


OK, that's about it for now! I'm having breakfast and going out for a while. I probably left out a few details in my post and didn't explain it all too well, and there's probably grammer and typos everywhere. I hope there isn't any misunderstandings, I feel extreme anxiety when starting a topic so please go easy on me.

What features would you like to see included in SONAR 9.?....

Feature Requests - CW has stated they listen to their customers, sure I don't expect any of the suggestions above will be included in S9 because basically it's whatever CW final decisions are but it don't hurt submitting a FR and discussing it here.


post edited by SongCraft - 2009/03/30 00:06:47

 
 
#1

193 Replies Related Threads

    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/25 08:26:02 (permalink)
    Nice ideas Song. What I would want for the envelopes is a latch mode for use with a CS.

    The Track Inspector needs to show all widgets of the selected MIDI track.The compact view you have would be far more useful if this were so.

    An auto zoom for a selected track. This would automatically zoom the track to a preconfigured zoom level just by activating the track. When another track is active the last track goes back to the default zoom and the new one zooms in to the zoom that setting.

    The CV will hi-lite the track that is active. This is for a CS but would be useful no matter what. Selecting a track that the CV isn't showing via a CS will jump that track to be seen and hi-lighted.

    Track templates can be applied to existing tracks.

    A button to clean up the TV by turning off all tool bars. Pressing the button again will restore them to the state they were in before they were turned off. This could be user configurable to also minimize track headers and so on. The idea would be to give maximum track view to the tracks. Things such as the track inspector could also be turned off with this button. The tabs and such all non needed stuff would be turned off with this single button. Maybe even the window title bar for Sonar too.

    In the keybindings dialog a search function please. Also the ability to print out the keybindings.

    A macro recorder and player.

    Upgrade the Staff view.

    I would be a very happy camper if these things were in Sonar.






    Best
    John
    #2
    candlesayshi
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 694
    • Joined: 2008/02/01 00:00:55
    • Location: Chicago, IL
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/25 08:37:25 (permalink)
    Interesting ideas. Maybe sometime soon I'll do a mock-up of a new GUI design, too.

    The Perfect Drummer is a neat idea, mostly because I'm so adamantly against Session Drummer 2. What might also be a good idea there, because they wouldn't be getting rid of SD2, for compatibility reasons I'm sure, but perhaps something like Velocity 2, or Velocity Pro, that'd be excellent. As Velocity is already leaps and bounds better than SD2.


    #3
    Scoot
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 875
    • Joined: 2007/06/29 13:53:59
    • Location: Da Nang, Vietnam
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/25 09:07:37 (permalink)
    I would like to see midi effects expanded.


    A midi split, to allow 2 seperate chains of effects to run off the one input. allowing for more complicated routings.

    Midi output and channel selector, to allow the output and channel to be selected from an effect

    Chord Creator, simply select the chord shape to be triggered from one note. additional to this, the hord shape could also be manipulated in different ways. midi signal such as controller of key in a different range to change to Minor, with another trigger to change Inversions and chord shapes

    I think these could be really creative and could allow sipmle thing such as

    'Midi split', one stays normal, the other through the 'Midi Out' to select another synth for intant layering, ('Chord Creator' of 'Echodelay' (1 mili second delay and Pitch Offeset) could then be used to play the second synth at octaves of other intervals.

    'Chord creator' combined with 'Midi' out to send top notes to one synth bottom to another with differnet seletions between.

    I think this could get really creative


    HP ENVY Notebook - 15t-k100 CTO i7 -4510U CPU @ 2.00 GHZ 8gb RAM. Windows 8.1 64bit Full HD Touchscreen
    Sonar X3 Producer, AAS Complete set, XLN AD Keys and Drums, TH2
    Roland Quad Capture, AudioTeckina 3035 Mic and ATH-M50 Headphones.
    Korg Nanopad2, WX5 Midi Sax, , Soprano Sax, Alto and Soprano Flute, Acoustic Guitar and Epiphone Dot
     
              Scoot not scook
    #4
    gordonrussell76
    Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1879
    • Joined: 2006/12/15 05:28:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/25 09:23:44 (permalink)
    Playlists would be nice, I often start a tune by coming up with sections, and trying to move them all round to try different arrangements is a pain in the butt.

    I know this already exists in PT, Cubase and I think Live, it would be a nice addition.

    They may already be a way of doing this in Sonar, if someone knows chime in.
    #5
    WDI
    Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2069
    • Joined: 2007/08/28 02:31:11
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/25 09:35:26 (permalink)
    Sounds like some great ideas. As far as "New Envelope Enhancements including New Nodes" I wish they would add optional envelope lanes to track view, optional meaning you could view envelopes also the old way or toggle the lanes on and pick which evelopes are viewed in the lanes. I think everyone has experienced the frustration of constantly having to show/hide envelopes when the nodes are aligned one on top of the other. Often various envelopes share the same paremeters and it makes it difficult to work with them, one on top of the other. Or at least when you mouse over close nodes, a selection box should be made available for nodes in close proximity allowing for the selection of nodes not on the top level, or both. Also, it would be nice if you could multi select envelopes across the lanes to modify several envelopes at once.

    Also, it would be very helpful if node data showed up in the event inspector and could be modified from there. The event inspector is already kinda the global place to modify event data, enelopes should also be editable from this global tool.
    post edited by WDI - 2009/02/25 09:43:43

    Sonar 7 PE
    Windows XP Pofessional (SP3)
    MSI K8N Neo4-F
    AMD Athlon 64 3500+
    2 GB PC 3200 Ram
    RME Fireface 800
    Edirol FA-66
    CM Labs MotorMix

    Old stuff: ARJO
    #6
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/25 09:52:01 (permalink)
    Or at least when you mouse over close nodes, a selection box should be made available


    Agree with you there Todd - very similar to the box you get in the Midi PRV for selecting which tracks you intend to work with.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #7
    SongCraft
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3902
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 08:35:38 (permalink)
    Thanks John, you have some nice ideas too! The auto-zoom coupled with my idea to toggle between 3 views (ultra-compact, midway view and fully expanded view) using the "F" key command would be a great enhancement because the Track Inspector is very convenient! As you explained, just like I do I keep the TV compact and use the Trk-Inspector therefor I can see around 40 tracks at glance whilst still being able make adjustments/edits.

    If you notice in the image I posted (Track View), I didn't explain Track Titles which allows more space-view to name tracks titles thus a better description for the tracks! This may seem like a minor wish list but it certainly would be more useful. For example: currently the way SONAR is if I wanted to name a track; Very Nice Ricky Bass .... it would display something like this.... VryNicIckyBss

    Your other ideas for TV are really good. Sure would make SONAR a more pleasant GUI to work with.

    Agree about the SV also.


    candlesayshi, I'm disappointed with SD2. It has awesome potential (has a few good sounds, I like the width and tuning controls, the GUI isn't too bad) yet it's another half-baked throw for SONAR and no expansion pack will save it since most users who have used SD2 either end up going for ToonTracks, AD, Battery, Stylus or other(s) drum software. If people say that SONAR is meant to be a DAW anything else is a bonus then to a point I agree but then again I think SONAR could raise their potential sales by not throwing in half-baked toys that end up gathering dust (long forgotten). I don't mean to sound harsh and with all due respect CW relies on it's customers for honest feedback.

    Your suggestion to add Velocity is a great idea.

    Back when SONAR.6 was released I read a fair review, SONAR got 4.5 star rating which is pretty darn good, though one of the minor issues brought up were about the continuous addons (plugins) that seem to accumulate over the years after each release so they suggested CW would be best integrating the BEST OF ALL those plugs into a few really powerful mighty plugins. Thus my idea for Perfect Drummer and Perfect Sampler, with just these two plugs I imagine they would include the best sounds from all that has been done/released by CW + new sounds and cool new features + enhancements to workflow, better sound quality and have both easy edit mode and advance mode for tweaking sounds (see my first post).

    I think adding some ideas from P.5 would be good too. CW should look at other popular plugins to get ideas for a really good GUI, user-friendly, searchable patch library browser (no separate popup windows) and being able to load just about any type of file.


    gordonrussell76, Playlist. I absolutely agree, oh man the amount I time I spend changing arrangements is very annoying! I can imagine nothing more disappointing than having a client say... hmm the bridges need to come after the choruses not before the choruses, can ya' fix it all NOW!?!

    I would imagine one way for CW to add this feature is by key command + select along the timeline (selects all clips) + name selection + add to playlist (OK) done in a matter of seconds, and then it displays a PlayList Marker above the timeline or creates a Playlist-Track that displays all the markers. ----- BUT the other issue is the must for Groove-Clips, I wish SONAR would just DO IT with Linear Clips since that's how I and I'm sure a lot of others work with SONAR. When I perform + record I like to capture the ENTIRE performance from start to end because it also captures the heart, the very soul of the performance.


    Scoot, wow I thought SONAR had a midi Chord Creator, ya think it would be something already available long ago and the idea to chain is a good one too. I wouldn't use Chord Creator but I'm sure there's a lot of others who would find it very useful.


    WDI, Yes! +1 Your idea for Envelope Lanes with the ability to show/hide different nodes would be excellent. Add other workflow options such as my idea for an Envelope Tool Bar (making it easier for newbies) by selecting a track you then click on a node in the Env Tool Bar to toggle between show/hide, advance users can use key/b commands.

    I know it's really frustrating working with nodes, trying to grab one and not the other is a pain!!! I try to limit the amount of nodes to avoid this but sometimes the track requires additional nodes. My idea to have different shaped nodes may help to an extent for example: if you place a circle node over a square node you would be able to grab either node a little easier. see pic....



    .... and also my idea to add Auto-Zoom (depending on how far you zoom into a clip the nodes increase in size. The same should apply to Clip Anchors.

    Currently with SONAR after working on nodes for a few hours my eyes get so strained I can't see a darn thing let alone those tiny little nodes.

    Your other idea for a Node Selection Box (as you mouse-over a node) is a great idea too. Most likely an idea that shouldn't be too difficult for CW developers to add.



    Everyone,

    Please contribute your ideas and lets discuss them here, and maybe, possibly refine those ideas! What I want to do is compile a list of all our ideas and then we ALL support those ideas = submit a Feature Request. I can assist by doing graphics which can be included in our FR (as a link) as the saying goes... a picture paints a thousand words.

    SONAR.9 will probably be released around October/September but we need to get our ideas submitted by no later than July (rough guess) because by then CW would have already decided on what to include and be in the beta testing soon after. Sure, not all our ideas will make it to S.9 but it don't hurt trying and people power = power in numbers will help because CW has said they go on what is most requested by the customers.


     
     
    #8
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 09:07:56 (permalink)
    I think this list is filled with great ideas. Everyone has made a real contribution to this in a highly thoughtful way. Good job all.

    I would like to add one more thing to the list. Play order track. The ability to rearrange a project with sections playing according to their order in a play order track. This is done without moving or editing any track. Cubase SX 3 had this and it is a great tool. I see Gorden has this under play lists it should be "play order tracks". Not that the name is all that important.

    Excellent thread!

    Best
    John
    #9
    vuterly
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2009/02/01 13:46:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 09:25:21 (permalink)
    I think adding some ideas from P.5 would be good too. CW should look at other popular plugins to get ideas for a really good GUI, user-friendly, searchable patch library browser (no separate popup windows) and being able to load just about any type of file.

    YES.

    An easier, more intuitive way to browse software instruments for patches/presets is much needed.

    I would also like to see:


    • True instrument tracks: not a workaround-like MIDI and audio combo, a real different kind of track that won't misbehave and be buggy. Preferably one that can accept both audio and MIDI FX inserts.
    • Better synchronisation between synth rack and track view: if you delete something from the synth rack, its associated instrument track will become orphaned. Equally, if you delete an instrument track, you would somewhat expect the associated synth to disappear as well. I just don't find the present setup very intuitive.
    • Envelopes automatically copied within groove clips: that is, if you have a groove clip and use some automation on it, the envelope should automatically be copied when you drag out the clip and create further instances of its material.
    • Transport no longer disrupted by saving or insertion of new softsynths: this really annoys me, partially because I compose using loops and add instruments on the fly, but the saving thing must surely get to everyone.
    • Aim Assist should work in the bus pane as well as the track pane: self explanatory.


    I might think of more later, those spring to mind though.
    #10
    Marah
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 975
    • Joined: 2009/02/04 21:56:41
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 12:43:27 (permalink)
    I would never turn down new plugins like those described. They'd be great to have. Would I like to have Dimension Pro, the channel tool, Beatscape, and the other goodies that are "included with" Sonar 8? Sure. But I really don't need them. And that's not what Sonar needs to offer to stay competitive as a creative production environment, I don't think.

    Sonar needs a better marker system, including regions and smooth, realtime marker transitions (not a substitute for a 'playlist', but still useful for some playlist purposes.)

    Better plugin management, not just at the install-and-scan level, but at the choose-insert-and-use level.

    Better automation presentation and management.

    More flexible, less linear, multi-destination routing, including a less strict track/bus/folder split.

    Fewer dialogs, especially modal ones, and more functionality on those dialogs that are necessary.

    More customization and a better customization system and interface, including better integration of toolbars (which need to be way more flexible than at present), menus, and keybinding, with full-command availability.

    More command (and visual) consistency across modes and views.

    Sonar needs better project and asset management, including a per-project-folder-based 'clean audio folder' tool that doesn't require a brute-force system-wide trawl through a terabyte+ of cheap hard drive space. (Though ironically, cheap hard drive space makes an improved CAF less pressing. But still.)

    Sonar needs a realtime, transport-integrated play rate control ('varispeed') that is optionally pitch-independent. I've been using this in another host and it's impossible to overstate its day to day usefulness. I really can't imagine working without it.

    Sonar needs less yearly-update-driven development.
    post edited by Marah - 2009/02/26 12:44:23
    #11
    strikinglyhandsome1
    Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7224
    • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 12:48:08 (permalink)
    I'll support any drum thingy.
    I've been banging that particular drum myself.

    #12
    vuterly
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2009/02/01 13:46:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 13:14:21 (permalink)
    Sonar needs less yearly-update-driven development.

    I agree with this too. More thoughtful TLC and less rushing to create "new stuff" would benefit Sonar greatly, IMHO.
    #13
    thebiglongy
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 502
    • Joined: 2006/01/29 19:20:31
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 13:44:01 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: Marah

    Sonar needs less yearly-update-driven development.




    I will agree with this, i know you dont have to upgrade if you dont want to. But half the time, the extra features and supposed extra stability and performance is touted, which obviously gets you in the mood to buy it.
    The problem comes when there are common issues which all face and each update does nothing about it.
    I would like to see cakewalk take more of an interaction and discussion in the forums to get a better idea of what users need out of the software.

    Oh and I would definately love to have a mode in sonar that works perfectly for live use with the ability to trigger lighting, projections & live audio without issue.
    Sonar Stage Performer.
    post edited by thebiglongy - 2009/02/26 13:48:37
    #14
    vuterly
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2009/02/01 13:46:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 19:11:08 (permalink)
    Something else important:

    Not requiring a name for each new project started.

    Sometimes I just want to jam! Not everything I create has a specific name to begin with! Etc.
    #15
    Richard Fey
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 650
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 11:52:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 19:24:11 (permalink)
    Not requiring a name for each new project started.

    Sometimes I just want to jam! Not everything I create has a specific name to begin with!


    Ctrl-N
    #16
    vuterly
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2009/02/01 13:46:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 19:27:13 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: Richard Fey

    Not requiring a name for each new project started.

    Sometimes I just want to jam! Not everything I create has a specific name to begin with!


    Ctrl-N

    You got me there. ;)

    But why should the New button and menu option not behave like that? Why should it be bound to a keyboard shortcut? Doesn't make sense to me.
    #17
    Richard Fey
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 650
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 11:52:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 19:29:08 (permalink)
    Doesn't bother me all that much. One does what you describe, the other allows me to create a folder structure beforehand.
    #18
    vuterly
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2009/02/01 13:46:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 19:32:06 (permalink)
    But new(ish) users such as myself will not necessarily know to use CTRL + N. We will reach for the menu option and assume it provides all of the new project creation functionality.

    Not a major issue, I fully realise, but I don't find it very intuitive.
    #19
    Richard Fey
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 650
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 11:52:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 19:35:16 (permalink)
    Hehe, you got what you wanted but that's not quite good enough, dammit.
    #20
    vuterly
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2009/02/01 13:46:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 19:37:36 (permalink)
    The grass is always greener. :) Oh, and thanks, btw.
    post edited by vuterly - 2009/02/26 19:43:18
    #21
    Marah
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 975
    • Joined: 2009/02/04 21:56:41
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 20:02:26 (permalink)
    And let's not forget plugin chains....

    ORIGINAL: vuterly

    Something else important:

    Not requiring a name for each new project started.

    Sometimes I just want to jam! Not everything I create has a specific name to begin with! Etc.


    That sometimes snags me too. There are two ways around that, one more permanent than the other (though neither is permanent-permanent.)

    The request for a name happens only if the per-project folder option (Options-Global-Audio Data) is enabled.

    Do you can disable PPF. But PPF has many advantages so that's not a great solution.

    But you can also, when you do a File-New, uncheck the 'Store Project Audio in it's own folder' option. Press Enter or click OK, and you're in a new unnamed project! Much better solution.

    HTH

    post edited by Marah - 2009/02/26 20:08:34
    #22
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 20:10:50 (permalink)
    My way around this is create a folder with a project called empty. This project is used to start anything I wish. If I wish to save it I make a new folder and project with a name that is appropriate using the save as function. The folder for this project also has a name of 1 a empty. That way that folder will be the first one in the projects folder. BTW if any audio is in the project then simply check move audio data when you save as.
    post edited by John - 2009/02/26 20:17:22

    Best
    John
    #23
    vuterly
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2009/02/01 13:46:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 20:14:34 (permalink)
    Hmmm...

    So it seems a few people have a vague need for what I proposed, what with all these ingenious workarounds being banded about. It's only a small thing, maybe Cakewalk could do something about it.

    By the way, I have my default template set up totally blank, so Sonar is always ready for whatever I need to do when first started up.
    #24
    eric_peterson
    Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1103
    • Joined: 2003/11/25 10:24:05
    • Location: The jungles of Oregon ...
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 20:18:30 (permalink)
    I'd like to see special forums for feature requests; one per program. The sticky notes at the top could be the features that CW is taking seriously. If there was a way to get the users to "Vote" for the feature requests in the forum that would be slick. The current web page submission feels like a black hole sometimes ... Maybe the feature request forums could be restricted to registered users? Maybe I'm dreaming ...

    A little dreaming can go along way though. :-) Way back when I had just received PA9 and I wasn't married and had no resposibilities, I had a dream for Pro Audio 10. I sat down one weekend and wrote a rather large software requirements document for PA-10 (I write SW requirements for a living) and sent it to CW. The Program Manager at the time (Morton Saether) actually printed it out and took it to meetings in a binder. The next thing I knew we had a new program coming out about a year later called "SONAR" that rolled in a lot of my ideas. Call me delusional if you will, but I'd like to think I influenced things a bit.
    #25
    ...wicked
    Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7360
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
    • Location: Seattle
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/26 22:41:30 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: Marah
    And let's not forget plugin chains....


    Let's NOT forget plugin chains! Talk about a feature whose time has come. And I'm not falling for the head-fake of "use track templates". They're two different things.

    Regarding different collapsed views, I had asked previously but it turns out you can't: I would love to be able to collapse the widget section of the track view with a keyboard shortcut. This way I can toggle between MAXIMUM clip area with the Inspector and the regular sized track view. It would make editing much easier.

    And also YES to Play Order Track, Performance Sections, or whatever everyone else is calling them (because they all have them). We need the ability to define sections of our linear sequencer and more flexibly cut/copy/paste/re-combine/sequence/loop/and trigger. The grouping tools intro'd last version were so very inadequate for all but the simplest editing tasks.

    Instrument tracks? Bah. DOA to me. I personally never cared about having them separate but for one major thing: WHEN YOU SELECT A MIDI TRACK CONNECTED TO A SOFT-SYNTH SONAR SHOULD RECOGNIZE THAT. Not just for mute/solo/etc (which it does) but for BOUNCING and EXPORTING.

    I also think it's time for an updated routing schema. Look, lets face it: Reaper has basically re-written the rules as far as that goes... for EVERYONE. And while I don't expect SONAR to inherit this power overnight (or within a version), that cat is out of the bag as far as complex routings for triggering, gating, conditional EQ and the like. At the very least make all plugins input selectable so we can route a separate audio track to it.

    Soft-synths: Ugh. I haven't been impressed with the latest batch at all. Beatscape is a face-plant. SD2 is too anemic to be worth considering. I like the Step-Sequencer a lot, and if they revamp DRUM MAPS (which lets face it, are 1999 technology) it might actually become way more usable.

    Plugins: well, gotta give credit where credit is due. I love the new plugs. I wish they didn't spend so much attention on them, but the tube leveller, transient designer, and boost11 are all top notch.

    ===========
    The Fog People
    ===========

    Intel i7-4790 
    16GB RAM
    ASUS Z97 
    Roland OctaCapture
    Win10/64   

    SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
    billions VSTs, some of which work    
    #26
    SongCraft
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3902
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/02/28 19:58:12 (permalink)
    Vuterly suggestion: add Ctrl+N to the File Menu, making it easier for newbies to know this feature exist.

    Marah - Plugin Chains. +1

    Also, could you elaborate on the inconsistencies between modes/views?

    In regards to CW yearly releases, although some people look forward it I think a compromise should suffice = release every 18 months. I suppose CW is a smaller company compared to others and I don't expect them to work around the clock 24/7, as it is they probably work intensively over long hours it's a wonder they have time to scratch themselves, and I suppose they get disappointed when too many issues occur, then the crazy aftermath for updates 1, 2 and 3 which seem to be a yearly occurrence.

    Eric_Peterson - Yes! There isn't a Poll (vote) options for these forums and I also agree it would be useful especially for topic/threads like this. Hmmm I guess the next best thing is to vote by adding this +1.

    I will compile a list and post all our FR suggestions and I hope more people will contribute to to effort since CW does read these forums and they say they do listen to their customers.

    I appreciate all you guys contributing to this thread! I'm sure CW appreciates customer feedback.


    Wicked - +1.... I agree with what you said.

    Luckily for those who prefer the old way of Midi+Audio tracks setup that option remains and I hope CW continues to keep that option available.

    I agree with define selections and improved group editing + more flexibility. Definitely would enhance/speed up workflow. Yes! The same should also apply to other improvements such as... playlists and editing song arrangements.

    Trk View: John's suggestion for auto-zoom as an option with predefined user settings would be nice, along with an additional option for the 'F' key command which toggles between various views = Fully expanded, Mid-Way View and Ultra-Compact View, (which could also be predefined in user settings.


    I'm in a rush at the moment, sorry if I missed something! My wife and I are about to go out.

    Have a great weekend everyone!
    post edited by SongCraft - 2009/02/28 20:05:14

     
     
    #27
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/03/01 20:29:11 (permalink)
    One more thing I would like would be a node thinner when we use a CS for automation.

    Best
    John
    #28
    SongCraft
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3902
    • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/03/05 11:03:45 (permalink)
    Post edited: Click here

    post edited by SongCraft - 2009/03/07 12:55:36

     
     
    #29
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Feature Requests 2009/03/05 12:28:59 (permalink)
    Excellent!!

    Best
    John
    #30
    Page: 12345.. > >> Showing page 1 of 7
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1