pro tools 9

Page: < 123 Showing page 3 of 3
Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
MemphisJo
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 594
  • Joined: 2009/02/08 20:24:22
  • Status: offline
Re:pro tools 9 2010/11/10 00:00:21 (permalink)

I am buying PT9 and I am going to try to install it on that win XP 32 machine you built me so long ago. Goodness, that thing still does all I want with the exception of huge memory capability.
 
I would be interested to see how PT9 works with XP, please advise. I was under the impression that it will not work with XP because according to AVIDs minimum requirements page they do not mention XP as a supported OS and therefore I guess that means they will not offer support if you are running it on an XP machine!   
 
I would like to upgrade to PT9 but I do not want to build a new Windows 7 computer right now.
 
I just had a thought, perhaps it will only operate in stand alone native mode with Win 7?
 
I just assumed that I couldn't use it without buying a new computer. 
Cheers.
post edited by MemphisJo - 2010/11/10 00:03:40

www.soundclick.com/peter-nigel-productions 
Shuttle PC, Mbox2 pro, some guitars and keyboards (with amps and straps etc), Sonar 8 PE plus some other stuff.


#61
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:pro tools 9 2010/11/10 08:04:19 (permalink)
I'll keep you posted.

I've read of many people installing PT9 on Win XP32 and saying it works.

I simply jumped in the mud puddle and intend to ride it out until I have something working.

I prepared my general purpose laptop last night as a back up plan. It is Win7 64 and I have stripped all the junk ware, but it is stuffed with my graphics apps and the like.

We'll see what happens.

best regards,
mike


#62
vinski
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 300
  • Joined: 2009/05/15 11:05:02
  • Location: Kent, Great Britain
  • Status: offline
Re:pro tools 9 2010/11/14 07:10:47 (permalink)
Anyone gonna be using Sonar for midi and PT9 for mixing?  Seems like a winning combo if you outsource.

Pentium D 2.8, SP3
2GB Ram, Nvidia Geforce 8600 GT
HP vs19e, Samsung Synchmaster 2032BW
Edirol FA-66
Evolution MK-225C
Sonar 8.3.1
#63
djwayne
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2021
  • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
  • Location: USA
  • Status: offline
Re:pro tools 9 2010/11/14 08:57:22 (permalink)
vinski


Anyone gonna be using Sonar for midi and PT9 for mixing?  Seems like a winning combo if you outsource.


I'm using Sonar Home Studio 7XL for midi, and Audition 3 for mixing. It works for me.
#64
MemphisJo
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 594
  • Joined: 2009/02/08 20:24:22
  • Status: offline
Re:pro tools 9 2010/11/15 02:30:05 (permalink)
vinski


Anyone gonna be using Sonar for midi and PT9 for mixing?  Seems like a winning combo if you outsource.


I had thought about this but PT8 LE has a really nice midi editor, I can only assume 9 is as good if not better.

www.soundclick.com/peter-nigel-productions 
Shuttle PC, Mbox2 pro, some guitars and keyboards (with amps and straps etc), Sonar 8 PE plus some other stuff.


#65
MemphisJo
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 594
  • Joined: 2009/02/08 20:24:22
  • Status: offline
Re:pro tools 9 2010/11/15 02:39:06 (permalink)
mike_mccue


Can you use Kontakt in it?

Yes.
 
http://www.native-instruments.com/#/en/products/producer/kontakt-player/?page=780

www.soundclick.com/peter-nigel-productions 
Shuttle PC, Mbox2 pro, some guitars and keyboards (with amps and straps etc), Sonar 8 PE plus some other stuff.


#66
MemphisJo
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 594
  • Joined: 2009/02/08 20:24:22
  • Status: offline
Re:pro tools 9 2010/11/15 02:45:51 (permalink)
What is all this nonsense that PT does not have input monitoring?
It even has a cool 'low latency' monitoring feature that switches off the plug ins.
 
One thing that bugged me was that all the M Box 2's all had a 'zero latency' direct monitor feature (as you would expect with most modern interfaces) .. all except the M Box 2 pro!

It simply states in the manual that "to achieve zero latency monitoring, users of the M Box 2 Pro should use a mixer"

Well that's what I've done for years and is, I guess, the 'Pro' way of doing things.

And what's the big 'con' of an iLok?


 

www.soundclick.com/peter-nigel-productions 
Shuttle PC, Mbox2 pro, some guitars and keyboards (with amps and straps etc), Sonar 8 PE plus some other stuff.


#67
Page: < 123 Showing page 3 of 3
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1