Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
X3 Version Comparison Chart
http://www.cakewalk.com/Products/SONAR/versions.aspx Man, they are really making it hard for me to even accept that crossgrading to Studio would be a good option. If the Quad Curve and/ Tape Sim were included in Studio I might be able to stomach the $100 upgrade/crossgrade (I'm on X2 Producer). I wonder if those modules will be available for separate purchase and whether they'll work in X2a. Andrew (or whoever it was) told me I'd like the new Quad Curve and it does look very nice.
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:05:14
(permalink)
Yeah... unfortunately I can't afford the upgrade to Producer right now either. So I'm just going to have to wait, because I really want what Producer offers. It just sucks watching others gleefully downloading... 
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:06:21
(permalink)
stevec & beepster two words Loan Shark
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:09:09
(permalink)
bapu stevec & beepster two words Loan Shark
Huh... I hadn't considered that. Should I just tell them "yo, Bapu sent me. He said you give me da money and ya just fugetabout it, a-hight"? Sounds reasonable.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:09:59
(permalink)
I'm mostly interested in the fact that have now decided to maintain the product. I said it in the other thread... give Producer users a stripped out version of X3 Pro (without all the new plugs and PC modules) for $50 to act as the missing X2b patch. $100 for a version with Melodyne and the PC modules. Now THAT would be worth it and I would happily starve myself to pony up the cash... provided it actually works of course but it should, eventually, with regular maintenance.
|
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 20964
- Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:10:43
(permalink)
Beepster I'm mostly interested in the fact that have now decided to maintain the product. I said it in the other thread... give Producer users a stripped out version of X3 Pro (without all the new plugs and PC modules) for $50 to act as the missing X2b patch. $100 for a version with Melodyne and the PC modules. Now THAT would be worth it and I would happily starve myself to pony up the cash... provided it actually works of course but it should, eventually, with regular maintenance.
DITTO THAT!!!
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:11:40
(permalink)
lol, ed. My legs already don't work right. What else can they take?!
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:15:19
(permalink)
cclarry
Beepster I'm mostly interested in the fact that have now decided to maintain the product. I said it in the other thread... give Producer users a stripped out version of X3 Pro (without all the new plugs and PC modules) for $50 to act as the missing X2b patch. $100 for a version with Melodyne and the PC modules. Now THAT would be worth it and I would happily starve myself to pony up the cash... provided it actually works of course but it should, eventually, with regular maintenance.
DITTO THAT!!!
I hope they are listening because I'm trying really REALLY hard to stay on board here. Yesterday I had given up and was at peace. The renewed focus on maintenance has me all cranky again. grr...
|
smallstonefan
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2724
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
- Location: Papillion, Nebraska
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 12:56:06
(permalink)
Have to agree. I've been a Cake customer for AGES, and always stay current on Sonar. That said, I had to go back to X1 for stability reasons, and I was really hoping for an X2b patch. Heck, had they given me that a month ago I would probably be upgrading now. However, the lack of commitment to the stability of the product for current users makes this feel dirty to me. I have all the plugs I need and tons of EZ Drummer/Superior Drummer stuff. I'm still a huge cake fan, but I just want the core fixes and improvements... This might be the first update I don't jump on at release. Once burned. :(
|
brian brock
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 297
- Joined: 2007/02/16 18:00:18
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/28 13:08:36
(permalink)
Is it correct that there are no core functionality differences between Studio and Producer? Everything extra in Producer is effects and synths? Coupled with the persistence of previous versions' effects showing up in X3 I'm not seeing as compelling a reason to choose Producer. I believe it used to be that things like Audiosnap were Producer only. Now it looks like you're paying 50 dollars for the drum sampler, tape effect, electric piano, fake guitar thing, and one Nomad Factory effect. Not a bad bundle for fifty bucks, if you want those particular sorts of tools and don't have similar tools already, I guess, although these in particular don't strike me as long-term reliable tools, rather as perhaps stepping stones to more robust implementations. Is a new (non-upgrade) copy of Producer really 300 dollars more expensive than Studio? That seems quite high for that effects bundle, especially given that there are in some cases multiple redundancies in capability in the rest of the Sonar X3 Studio package. What's the cost likely to be for upgrading from X3 studio to X3 producer?
|
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/29 23:52:26
(permalink)
bapu stevec & beepster two words Loan Shark
Two more words. Sell plasma.
DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2 OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread Memory: 16 GB Video: GTX-760Ti Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storagesonocrafters.com
|
Studious
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 222
- Joined: 2010/07/17 12:40:45
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 00:14:17
(permalink)
Beepster I'm mostly interested in the fact that have now decided to maintain the product. I said it in the other thread... give Producer users a stripped out version of X3 Pro (without all the new plugs and PC modules) for $50 to act as the missing X2b patch. $100 for a version with Melodyne and the PC modules. Now THAT would be worth it and I would happily starve myself to pony up the cash... provided it actually works of course but it should, eventually, with regular maintenance.
Cannot agree more. However, it appears we are in the minority. If you can resist the hype for a while, you may be able to buy into a deeper-patched version of X3 for a better price. Then, you can see if the maintenance commitment sticks.
|
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 00:39:12
(permalink)
Studious If you can resist the hype for a while, you may be able to buy into a deeper-patched version of X3 for a better price. Then, you can see if the maintenance commitment sticks.
I know everybody's financial situation is different, as are their work flow goals and aspirations for the product. So I wouldn't question anybody's decision about whether $150 is too much to pay. However, if anybody is looking for a rationalization or two, this is less money than going to Starbucks 2 or 3 times a month for the next year. And considering that X3 looks like it is a solid platform that will be well appreciated by users over its full lifetime (12-24 months presumably), if you are going to upgrade eventually, your best ROI is to do it now and get use of the product for the full time.
DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2 OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread Memory: 16 GB Video: GTX-760Ti Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storagesonocrafters.com
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 01:14:59
(permalink)
cparmerlee However, if anybody is looking for a rationalization or two, this is less money than going to Starbucks 2 or 3 times a month for the next year.
Heh. Giving up smoking is another way. I have an employee who recently performed this heartfelt (whining) speech about how he wasn't earning enough and that I should give him a pay rise to pay for his subway card to get to work. I pointed out to him the ridiculousness of someone who smokes a pack a day complaining about not being able to afford his train fare. The guy has a cigarette in his mouth every chance he gets! Not only that, but he has a top of the range Samsung phone and pays for some ridiculous all-you-can-download data plan. I'm not saying that everyone who's hard up has screwed up priorities like this guy, but it's amazing how many people are prepared to throw good money away on stuff they don't really need (or stuff that's killing them) while denying themselves things that could really make a difference.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
smallstonefan
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2724
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
- Location: Papillion, Nebraska
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 07:06:17
(permalink)
I would like to take a moment to shift the conversation away from price and back to value. I can afford this upgrade easily, but I don't see the value. I paid for X2 and had to go back to X1 due to crashes and I didn't complain. First, based on my decade or more with cake believed their would be a patch that would solve my issues, and second, again due to my experience with cake figured everyone screws up once in awhile. Now, I find that to get stability I have to upgrade. Also, since I have stayed a loyal Producer user (and have all of the Pro Channel modules), I have to spend extra money to buy a bunch of plugins I absolutely do not need or I lose my Producer and deal with the (almost certain) consequences of that in the future. I feel for those where money is tight, but don't let that diminish the legitimate feelings that this upgrade is not "worth it" considering the other variables.
|
michaelhanson
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3529
- Joined: 2008/10/31 15:19:56
- Location: Mesquite, Texas
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 07:37:24
(permalink)
The fly out Quad Curve EQ is REALLY nice and it was something users asked for. I spent some time comping some vocal takes this morning and it was so easy compared to past versions. I am taking a stab at each new feature as the opportunity comes along to us it with in my latest song mix, those 2 features this morning were fantastic.
post edited by MakeShift - 2013/09/30 11:01:48
|
Guitarpima
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4125
- Joined: 2005/11/19 23:53:59
- Location: Terra 3
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 09:51:58
(permalink)
sharke
cparmerlee However, if anybody is looking for a rationalization or two, this is less money than going to Starbucks 2 or 3 times a month for the next year.
Heh. Giving up smoking is another way. I have an employee who recently performed this heartfelt (whining) speech about how he wasn't earning enough and that I should give him a pay rise to pay for his subway card to get to work. I pointed out to him the ridiculousness of someone who smokes a pack a day complaining about not being able to afford his train fare. The guy has a cigarette in his mouth every chance he gets! Not only that, but he has a top of the range Samsung phone and pays for some ridiculous all-you-can-download data plan. I'm not saying that everyone who's hard up has screwed up priorities like this guy, but it's amazing how many people are prepared to throw good money away on stuff they don't really need (or stuff that's killing them) while denying themselves things that could really make a difference.
That's a loaded response Sharke. Micro to macro, it's all about insanity.
Notation, the original DAW. Everything else is just rote. We are who we are and no more than another. Humans, you people are crazy. Win 7 x64 X2 Intel DX58SO, Intel i7 920 2.66ghz 12gb DDR3 ASUS ATI EAH5750 650w PSU 4x WD HDs 320gb DVD, DVD RW Eleven Rack, KRK Rokit 8s and 10s sub
|
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 10:59:57
(permalink)
MakeShift The fly out Quad Curve EQ is REALLY nice and it was something users asked for.
Yes, that is excellent. OK it would be nice to be able to float several of those EQ graphs at once, but still this is a very nice enhancement, especially including the frequency visualizer. I haven't had any dropouts. That is worth something. The startup time is a little faster. That is worth something. The Melodyne integration is terrific. That is worth a lot. I don't get the Blue Tubes thing. The idea of effects that don't provide any visual feedback is something I cannot appreciate at all. I don't need tools that try their best to look like a hardware product from 1960. I want tools that help me get where I am going fast and with the best results. I'll probably never use those things. I haven't used the comping feature yet, but looking at the video, I see whee it will save time over my prior method of using the erase tool to delete everything except the take I want to keep. This is worth something. To me, it just isn't very hard to find $150 of value here.
DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2 OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread Memory: 16 GB Video: GTX-760Ti Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storagesonocrafters.com
|
Andrew Rossa
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1910
- Joined: 2006/04/14 13:33:18
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:27:49
(permalink)
Beepster http://www.cakewalk.com/Products/SONAR/versions.aspx Man, they are really making it hard for me to even accept that crossgrading to Studio would be a good option. If the Quad Curve and/ Tape Sim were included in Studio I might be able to stomach the $100 upgrade/crossgrade (I'm on X2 Producer). I wonder if those modules will be available for separate purchase and whether they'll work in X2a. Andrew (or whoever it was) told me I'd like the new Quad Curve and it does look very nice.
Beeptser, the reason for the $50 difference is because we do include stuff like the Tape Emulator and QuadCurve Zoom. We believe the $50 jump offers immense value even if you have a 1 or 2 things included in it. These modules will not be available separately but if they were, I'd imagine they'd be $99 each or something. Seriously, check out the pricing on Tape Emulator and comparable EQs.
|
Andrew Rossa
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1910
- Joined: 2006/04/14 13:33:18
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:30:49
(permalink)
smallstonefan I would like to take a moment to shift the conversation away from price and back to value. I can afford this upgrade easily, but I don't see the value. I paid for X2 and had to go back to X1 due to crashes and I didn't complain. First, based on my decade or more with cake believed their would be a patch that would solve my issues, and second, again due to my experience with cake figured everyone screws up once in awhile. Now, I find that to get stability I have to upgrade. Also, since I have stayed a loyal Producer user (and have all of the Pro Channel modules), I have to spend extra money to buy a bunch of plugins I absolutely do not need or I lose my Producer and deal with the (almost certain) consequences of that in the future. I feel for those where money is tight, but don't let that diminish the legitimate feelings that this upgrade is not "worth it" considering the other variables.
Perhaps the SONAR X3 Studio upgrade would be better for you. You get the ProChannel, all your modules will work, and you get all the core workflow features and Melodyne. I understand your concern about losing Producer but at the end of the day the tools you use to make music are most important. SONAR X3 Studio is pretty powerful.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:32:37
(permalink)
It's a good point. I think Slate Virtual Tape is closer to $200
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
Andrew Rossa
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1910
- Joined: 2006/04/14 13:33:18
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:35:52
(permalink)
brian brock Is it correct that there are no core functionality differences between Studio and Producer? Everything extra in Producer is effects and synths? Coupled with the persistence of previous versions' effects showing up in X3 I'm not seeing as compelling a reason to choose Producer. I believe it used to be that things like Audiosnap were Producer only. Now it looks like you're paying 50 dollars for the drum sampler, tape effect, electric piano, fake guitar thing, and one Nomad Factory effect. Not a bad bundle for fifty bucks, if you want those particular sorts of tools and don't have similar tools already, I guess, although these in particular don't strike me as long-term reliable tools, rather as perhaps stepping stones to more robust implementations. Is a new (non-upgrade) copy of Producer really 300 dollars more expensive than Studio? That seems quite high for that effects bundle, especially given that there are in some cases multiple redundancies in capability in the rest of the Sonar X3 Studio package. What's the cost likely to be for upgrading from X3 studio to X3 producer?
Customers buying new often don't have anything so you have to really evaluate the entire package and what you get for the additional $300. You start totaling it up and it's way way more than $300. Tremendous value. Compare it to other competitors who ask for $200 or more to go up to the next version and see what they offer? Unlimited tracks, 64-bit? You need to pay for that? We spent a lot of time looking at each version of SONAR X3 and seeing how we could make it better for new and existing customers. I think we significantly raised the bar for each version. I don't want to try and market here to you because this a peer-to-peer forum but do the research and you'll see what a great package each version offers in the SONAR X3 lineup.
|
Andrew Rossa
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1910
- Joined: 2006/04/14 13:33:18
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:40:48
(permalink)
Beepster I'm mostly interested in the fact that have now decided to maintain the product. I said it in the other thread... give Producer users a stripped out version of X3 Pro (without all the new plugs and PC modules) for $50 to act as the missing X2b patch. $100 for a version with Melodyne and the PC modules. Now THAT would be worth it and I would happily starve myself to pony up the cash... provided it actually works of course but it should, eventually, with regular maintenance.
Slippery slope. What you are asking is to start building custom versions. And what you want will be different than what another customer wants. And pretty soon we have 30 different flavors. We have to try and offer as much value as we can at each price point. We know some people will own 1 or 2 things but seriously start adding up the value and you'll see that $150 is a bargain. And if you have all the plugins, you can go to Studio which is also a great value. We still have some of the most affordable upgrades in the industry. We stand by our pricing and think we put together a package that is fair for all. There are a lot of options and the fact that we put ProChannel in Studio offers the $99 price point still for those that just want the features and Melodyne (and Blue Tubes).
|
groverken
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 153
- Joined: 2007/09/22 16:06:46
- Location: Glasgow, UK
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:48:46
(permalink)
The question I basically want answered is will the ProChannel stuff in X2 Producer work in the X3 Studio installation? - assuming I don't uninstall X2. I've already got just about everything else and can live without a tape emulator.
Windows 10 (64-bit), Cakewalk by BandLab, ASUS Z170-A, Intel i7 6700k, ATI Radeon R5 230 2048Mb, 32GB RAM, 500GB SDD system drive, 2 250GB SSD samples drives, 2TB HDD, Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 (2nd generation), M-Audio Oxygen25, Korg i5M, Rapture Pro, Z3TA+2, SampleTank 3, BFD (2&3), Addictive Drums (1&2), EZdrummer2, MusicLab Real Guitar, EZmix2, Ozone 7 Elements, Neutron Elements, Overloud TH2, AmpliTube, T-RackS, Waves singles, Harrison Mixbus 4, Acoustica 7 Premium.Fender Stratocaster.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:55:33
(permalink)
Yes the PC modules from X2 Producer all work in X3 studio.
|
Andrew Rossa
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1910
- Joined: 2006/04/14 13:33:18
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 11:57:46
(permalink)
groverken The question I basically want answered is will the ProChannel stuff in X2 Producer work in the X3 Studio installation? - assuming I don't uninstall X2. I've already got just about everything else and can live without a tape emulator.
Yes. Sounds like we may need to put up an FAQ for the questions as they have been asked quite a bit. We'll get working on that.
|
smallstonefan
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2724
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
- Location: Papillion, Nebraska
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 12:01:05
(permalink)
Since I have Kramer Master Tape and a plethora of other plugs, perhaps Studio is the way to go. Still, I've never been able to use X2 because of the crashes, so that experience still stings.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 12:02:54
(permalink)
I appreciate the input, Andrew but believe me... I've done the math and weighed my options. I don't think a base producer package to simply get the bug fixes, core refinements (like the Take Lanes) and access to your new found maintenance commitment (X2 just needed that one last fix to make it golden for me) is such a wild idea. Seriously, I get it and I TRULY appreciate you even taking the time to respond to a somewhat negative post/request. I just really would like to be able to have the foundation of my DAW solid. It is the only thing I truly need right now and $600 in I think it's not such a crazy desire. Anyway, if the decision has been made and that is the final answer I can base my decisions from there. That is the most important thing for me. Knowing (knowledge is half the battle donchyaknow? ;-p). I've been doing a lot of cost/benefit analysis throughout all of this and $150 is just a little too much when I look through my options. Studio MAY be in the cards but I would hate to lose my Producer status and at $100... well without the Quad Curve improvement at the very least it's a hard pill for me to swallow. As always this is not meant to bash, hate or berate but to hopefully give some insight into the mind of a relatively recent adopter who has kind of lost his enthusiasm. Thank you again and I wish you all the luck in the future. Cheers.
|
Andrew Rossa
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1910
- Joined: 2006/04/14 13:33:18
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 12:08:59
(permalink)
Beepster I appreciate the input, Andrew but believe me... I've done the math and weighed my options. I don't think a base producer package to simply get the bug fixes, core refinements (like the Take Lanes) and access to your new found maintenance commitment (X2 just needed that one last fix to make it golden for me) is such a wild idea. Seriously, I get it and I TRULY appreciate you even taking the time to respond to a somewhat negative post/request. I just really would like to be able to have the foundation of my DAW solid. It is the only thing I truly need right now and $600 in I think it's not such a crazy desire. Anyway, if the decision has been made and that is the final answer I can base my decisions from there. That is the most important thing for me. Knowing (knowledge is half the battle donchyaknow? ;-p). I've been doing a lot of cost/benefit analysis throughout all of this and $150 is just a little too much when I look through my options. Studio MAY be in the cards but I would hate to lose my Producer status and at $100... well without the Quad Curve improvement at the very least it's a hard pill for me to swallow. As always this is not meant to bash, hate or berate but to hopefully give some insight into the mind of a relatively recent adopter who has kind of lost his enthusiasm. Thank you again and I wish you all the luck in the future. Cheers.
Great, good luck with your decision.
|
groverken
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 153
- Joined: 2007/09/22 16:06:46
- Location: Glasgow, UK
- Status: offline
Re: X3 Version Comparison Chart
2013/09/30 12:12:25
(permalink)
Thanks for the response Andrew. Looks like the Studio option is going to be the one for me. Been using the Producer edition since Sonar 6 but this time I think I'll resist. I'm at my download limit for the month, so maybe I'll have changed my mind by tomorrow!
Windows 10 (64-bit), Cakewalk by BandLab, ASUS Z170-A, Intel i7 6700k, ATI Radeon R5 230 2048Mb, 32GB RAM, 500GB SDD system drive, 2 250GB SSD samples drives, 2TB HDD, Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 (2nd generation), M-Audio Oxygen25, Korg i5M, Rapture Pro, Z3TA+2, SampleTank 3, BFD (2&3), Addictive Drums (1&2), EZdrummer2, MusicLab Real Guitar, EZmix2, Ozone 7 Elements, Neutron Elements, Overloud TH2, AmpliTube, T-RackS, Waves singles, Harrison Mixbus 4, Acoustica 7 Premium.Fender Stratocaster.
|