Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/08/11 14:59:52
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby John 2016/08/11 19:35:03
bgl1 I can switch my view filter across multiple audio tracks but only one instrument track at a time. That is maddeningly inconvenient. Okay, now I get what you don't understand. As it says in the documentation: "Quick Groups only affect tracks of the same type (Audio or MIDI)." It specifies Audio or MIDI, not Simple Instrument tracks. This is because Quick Grouping works on only a single track type. A simple instrument track, which I presume you're using instead of a split instrument track, combines two track types - MIDI and audio - within a single virtual track. The documentation also describes what happens with Instrument tracks: "For instrument tracks, the relevant controls [are] treated as belonging to an Audio or MIDI track." So for example, if you vary audio volume in the console and quick group with an instrument track, its audio volume will change. The only reference to Quick Grouping with Instrument tracks is controls, not the Edit Filter (for the reason given above). The solution is simple. Right-click on the Simple Instrument track number or track icon, and choose "Split Instrument Track." This separates the track into separate audio and MIDI tracks (which I prefer anyway, but that's a different topic). Now they are eligible for Quick Grouping. If this was one of the "problems" you reported that you expected support to answer, admittedly they could have said "You don't understand how Simple Instrument Tracks and Quick Grouping works, please read the documentation" but as has been pointed out, support is not intended to provide "how to" support. Reporting this as a problem isn't really relevant. It's more along the lines of "how do I change the Edit Filter setting when using Simple Instrument tracks?" In any event, now you know why the approach you're taking can't work, and an approach that does work. Hopefully that will make your life easier.
|
Brian Walton
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 584
- Joined: 2014/10/24 22:20:18
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/08/11 15:38:09
(permalink)
bgl1 To all of you who are offering advice for the problems I've experienced with Cakewalk Sonar Platinum: 1. I appreciate the desire to help me solve the 2 overarching problems that I've experienced. These are not obscure problems. They are much needed functions that are listed in the manual that are not working on my system. Asus laptop, Windows 8.1, 16gig RAM, i7 (3rd generation) processor, M-Audio Fast Track Pro set to Wave 16bit/44.1k, Sonar Platinum 22.7.0. 2. These are not problems that have not been addressed by Cakewalk Tech Support. They've logged into my system a few times in the late winter and early spring and never solved these issues. My sessions are rather large and full of synth and fx plugs. Using lanes helps but they suck up so much screen real estate that I really do want to be able to view automation without using lanes. 3. I can switch my view filter across multiple audio tracks but only one instrument track at a time. That is maddeningly inconvenient. I appreciate all the advice I've gotten from so many people over the years, but with my current "fat" sessions, some well needed AND PROMISED functionality has never worked for me...nor for Techs who've logged in tried it for themselves, AND, written up but never addressed these issues. I'm sure you understand my frustration. I've got more work to do and I've always gotten through with "work-arounds" and that's not right. 4. Mr. Anderton, I will never be your boss. Receiving good advice...fantastic. Bossing you....nope. Bruce
I have not tired either of your problems. Have others reported the same? If so, it isn't something you should expect to get "technical support " on it just gets added to the bug fixes pile. I understand the frustration, but neither of your issues sound like absolute show stoppers, like the program won't let you create music, etc. Good luck, but I think your thread is entirely inappropriate for the level of problem you are having with the software.
|
bgl1
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 48
- Joined: 2015/06/08 13:11:22
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/08/11 15:39:07
(permalink)
Mr. Anderton: This just may be the first bit of advice that might point me in a radically different direction...because yes, I have been using simple instrument tracks alongside the audio tracks for the past 8 or 9 months. And I thank you for sending me in for a little more individualized Sonar training that might actually lead me somewhere. (I really have lots more to accomplish in the next few months and it will involve as many audio tracks and instrument tracks together, again.) Mr. Anderton: My next question regards my reading from you in PAiA catalogs when I used to build their synthesizers while still in high scool. Perhaps a private message, I think. Did you contribute to those catalogs in the late 70's? That might be where I first encountered your name...as well as Larry Fast, who I think was also a contributor.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/08/11 16:57:19
(permalink)
One down. Let me know when you want to tackle your bouncing issues. Feel free to change the title again
|
bgl1
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 48
- Joined: 2015/06/08 13:11:22
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/08/11 17:39:53
(permalink)
Thanks, Mr. Anderton. Title to this Forum Thread is changed. Please let me know if the new title is acceptable to you and other forum viewers and managers. I will gladly discuss internal bouncing issues with you, but should that be on a different thread? If so, how may I alert you? Bruce
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/08/11 18:23:06
(permalink)
Hey, thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Glad to help! Start a new thread called "Bouncing Issues - Can Anyone Help?" Be very precise/clear about the exact nature of the problem, the context (project, system, etc.) and we'll figure it out. Bouncing can get complicated but once you know a couple crucial things, it becomes routine. And if there is a particular situation that causes a problem, we can provide steps to reproduce so it gets fixed.
|
Edmund L Sikorski
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2015/07/22 04:04:56
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Status: offline
Re: TECH SUPPORT Provided by Mr. Craig Anderton
2016/10/18 08:53:17
(permalink)
I just found a nearly new copy of Craig's book "Home Recording For Musicians". I bought it for $2 (and it still has the little floppy record inside). ------- "Doubling a vocal line can make a voice sound stronger" ----------- What a voice. Ah, the memories come flooding back.
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re: TECH SUPPORT Provided by Mr. Craig Anderton
2016/10/18 10:17:50
(permalink)
I don't know if this has been discussed - I didn't read every post - but I would think it would be natural with Cakewalk's push for new customers and the lure of "forever" updates to bring in a stream of newbies. There seems to be a lot of threads along the lines of "my computer doesn't do anything - do I need to turn it on" (not to dis newbies - we were all there at some point)? I don't know if it was bad luck, an evil plan or just part and parcel of the timing with all the "new" aspects of SONAR coincided with the influx of new customers requiring more help. Cake has said they lost some people, have hired more tech support people and are training them. I tend to believe people and companies unless they have lied to me directly, since most of my problems have turned out to be operator error. That is the first place I tend to look for problems when I, or others, have problems. And here we have Gibson's "chief magic officer" tech supporting on an open forum. That ain't bad. Of course, none of that helps if you have a non-functioning DAW. So maybe the squeaky wheel does get the gears of support rolling. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
Garry Stubbs
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2619
- Joined: 2008/02/18 17:34:48
- Location: Castlethorpe, UK
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 12:10:05
(permalink)
backwoods
slyman
bitman I've never call Cakewalk once in all the years I've used it. Got all my help here.
Same here.
ditto!
Roger that here too !
https://soundcloud.com/garry-kiosk Sonar Platinum 64-bit: Q6600 8Gb Win7 64-bit: KRK Monitors: ART MPA PRO VLA ii preamp: 3 x 500Gb internal SATA disks: Superior Drummer2: GPO4: Realstrat: Saxlab: Rapture: Dimension Pro: Ozone 4: Edirol SPS-660: PCR-500 MIDI controller: Korg PadKontrol: Fender / Gibson / Yamaha / Ibanez guitars:Guitar Rig 5: Dual 22" Monitors: Mapex Drums, Sabian AAX cymbals: Alesis DM5 Pro Kit: SE Electronics and Shure Mics: Mathmos Lava Lamp (40W)
|
Sir Les
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1182
- Joined: 2012/07/09 04:56:19
- Location: MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA,
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 12:43:25
(permalink)
The folks here are some of the best users of Daw and computer tweaking I have found, and the Data base of help is endlessly growing into the new...Mr G. Aderton's Help is good help...When it works for those trying to get the system up and running without issues...and is always at the news end of things coming, or being worked on. Although I taunt the Forums with nothing but windows MS crap....and always trying the cutting edge of futile setups to reduce issues with Audio devices, and daw interactions....It is always someone else at fault, and point the finger to third and fourth , and user flaws..or bad conflicts with add ons and such of differing natures. No one can solve for a constant change of unknown variables...it is impossible to do...unless all variables are known to be stable...In the PC domain, this is always thorted by MS and other applications changing things of the base platform, or working conditions to allow for something else, not foreseen as it changes. So, if tweaking is the best way to control and keep things working, as they should, if so claimed it does do, when achieved, or achieving ...Turn off all auto updates, and unplug your machine from the internet, so nothing changes. And see what is running behind the cloaked Desktop, and in service just before you do that control panel shut down of net and wi fi..if so needing to secure a stable platform. As for internet. Open Dos command Prompt type: netstat 3 any number after netstat is the amount of seconds between checks..... it will check your ports in the above every three seconds. And see what is sending, and what is trying to ping...and such. Now about bandwidth...which the user pays for....If these entities using your internet bandwidth, are taking your info for marketing, or other reasons without permission...and sending it on your paid bandwidth...or they are using your computer when ever they need a hub to send or receive data to and from..Your local, and from it,...It can be used for , and against you also...and they are not paying or helping pay your bills...Just finding ways to bill you, or sell you, or hold you accountable to...Possible infections, or mayhem..through your IP. Please be advised...Anti Virus can help, but is not proven to stop any virus attacks, or deplyment, or sabotage, or changing setting without your approval..if so remotely entering your domain via these ports of access...and new viruses will not be detected if the Antigen is not listed in the protection node software, and can go unseen or detected for long periods of time...if well routed into apps. So...when the Military (Clinton's hinting madness of, is put into play of cyber attacks) on a Military internet made for communications if a Nuclear attack happens, that is now almost world wide in scope...(was it's intent to bring about the spy method onto all users?) now used to employ spy ware on the masses of users to invade the homes of many....One must ask, whom is wanting to know about so many people's doings, in that military and why?....or is it false market data collection to sway market economics?..and have underhanded knowledge to make money off of that data, and surplant false shares in or on...? Prudence eh? Now about legal privacy...My home is not a war zone. I thought in my country I was given grace and Privacy as a way of living...in Trust. Peace...and hopefully one day health...for all living things. Is that just a pipe dream?....if they set to setup ruin of many via these back doors...and what trust, if no trust?...and why the paranoid Propaganda being uttered in 2nd dibate, about internet threats coming to be another need for national security?... by President hopeful H Clinton?...and yet, the very system is spying and taking data without permission...used to make profits and gains off of....knowledge of buying and selling of the masses. Do Us users ever see a dime of that as in kick backs?...oh no, just more tax and higher prices to gain more tax, and more taxes devised to make more warfare and terror be....so it can be...and so it is....eh? Just thinking out loud. Blessings to the Good ones!...keep doing the good ,and help take down the paranoid delusions made, and sur planted in the ears, minds and hearts, who hear them say , and also do unthinkable attrosities, to make war be too high a price to continue with making be.....(it does cost the tax payer trillions)......nothing in the dark a good light cannot dispell....and a good deed to those whom hate...may turn to reason it out, so no threat is seen! See how this is being imposed...now if the beast keeps being fed...and is fed...federal tax and duty, and or donations...and data to fix the markets to slanted gains...as it is, or may be used for....Then the end of this will be tragically Hippo critical hypocrisy of amended rights! teaching how to make war, sell war, and protect from war...is big business! wonder why...if we all want peace, health and happiness...is a wonderment to mint tea?..damned another variable no doubt to add in to the cup? Keep it simple, Keep in mind what these things can be...and make em good..or better...will be blessed if so done! Regards! Sir Les.
1. Intel 5960x 3.5mhz , ASUS x99 deluxe u3.1, Asus Thunderbolt ex II, G skills f4 3000 Memory 32GB , ADATA ssd 250GB Main Drive, Lots of WD Red 7200 Mechanical Drives with Black Drives, 14x multi optical Drive, LG Multi Blu Drive, 2X Extern WD Mybooks usb 3.0, AMD r7 270 video card, Motu 828x TB , Motu Midi XT. 2. USING MAC PRO, as win 10 has damaged 2 x99 systems 8.1 is also to blame for the final burnout trying to roll back! 3. Something Wonderful: https://1drv.ms/f/s!AlHkRy9cXBbYpQNvVBCt8r7fQ5PS
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 13:02:11
(permalink)
Just FYI - this is an old thread. The new tech support people have now been at Cakewalk for a while, the backlog of support tickets has been reduced by about 80%, the flood of new users are getting up to speed, and support is functional again. Although there are still tweaks that need to be made for optimizing support in the future, at this point the main issues are in the rear-view mirror.
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 13:26:26
(permalink)
Anderton Just FYI - this is an old thread. The new tech support people have now been at Cakewalk for a while, the backlog of support tickets has been reduced by about 80%, the flood of new users are getting up to speed, and support is functional again. Although there are still tweaks that need to be made for optimizing support in the future, at this point the main issues are in the rear-view mirror.
Are you serious, man? There are still NO PHONE SLOTS, and it's been like that going on 6 months now. I'm sure I'm about to get chewed up by the wolf pack, but this fluff is beyond the pale.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 13:41:23
(permalink)
telecharge
Anderton Just FYI - this is an old thread. The new tech support people have now been at Cakewalk for a while, the backlog of support tickets has been reduced by about 80%, the flood of new users are getting up to speed, and support is functional again. Although there are still tweaks that need to be made for optimizing support in the future, at this point the main issues are in the rear-view mirror.
Are you serious, man? There are still NO PHONE SLOTS, and it's been like that going on 6 months now. I'm sure I'm about to get chewed up by the wolf pack, but this fluff is beyond the pale.
Are you serious this is "fluff"? These are facts. Do the math. I said the backlog has been reduced by 80%. That means 20% are still outstanding so of course, there will still be waiting times until the ENTIRE backlog is gone. But the 80% of high-priority cases have been resolved. Furthermore, you're seeing few, if any, complaint posts about unresolved issues, and recently there have been posts praising the speed of support. I said "there are still tweaks that need to be made for optimizing support in the future" - do you disagree with that? I also said "at this point the main issues are in the rear-view mirror." Because they are. The main issues were a huge backlog and a lack of support people. The backlog continues to be whittled away, and the support people have been hired. Furthermore additional support people were contracted to work on the backlog. Fluff? I think not.
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 13:50:35
(permalink)
Anderton Fluff? I think not.
Then answer me this since your posts are written in your "personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cakewalk Inc. or Gibson Brands Inc." How should a potential/existing Cakewalk customer evaluate Cakewalk's support?
|
kzmaier
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 461
- Joined: 2010/10/18 08:20:01
- Location: Rochester, NY
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 13:50:45
(permalink)
Never had a problem with Cake support. If they're getting hit hard lets cut them some slack. Besides the forum is such a great resource. Give us a try.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 13:58:28
(permalink)
telecharge
Anderton Fluff? I think not.
Then answer me this since your posts are written in your "personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cakewalk Inc. or Gibson Brands Inc." How should a potential/existing Cakewalk customer evaluate Cakewalk's support?
Since you didn't dispute any of my facts, I'll move on to your next question. The answer depends if that potential/existing user wants to look at the company's history, or the past few months. It also depends on whether they view the forum (which has participation from Cakewalk staff) as a viable support option, whether they take advantage of the FAQs before deciding they absolutely HAVE to have a phone call, or do a search on help. Think of all the posts here on basic issues that are answered in the FAQs or the documentation. If people don't read them, is that Cakewalk's fault? I hardly ever use support in general because over the years, my support experience with almost all companies (Waves, PC Audio Labs, and Sweetwater are notable exceptions) has been sufficiently discouraging that I don't even bother. Also many of the options are costly. I haven't had any issue with any software or hardware in the past several years that couldn't be resolved by asking the internet.
|
listen
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 593
- Joined: 2008/09/12 06:07:55
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 14:00:51
(permalink)
konradh If it helps, reading about the US Presidential election might make this seem less serious.
Now that is funny and true...
- Listen - FOH Mixer & Recording Studio Manager Nothing but the grace of God - mggtg. VS 700C - R / CONSOLE 1 / NEVE PORTICO 5017 / TASCAM UH-7000 / SONAR PLATINUM / REASON RECORD 9 / VMP 2 / UREI 7110's / UA LA-610 MkII / AUDIENT ASP 880 / CREATION STATION 450 V 5 WINDOWS 10 / HOME 64 - BIT / SKYLAKE CORE i7 (i7 - 6700, 4 CORES/8 THREADS)
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 14:14:05
(permalink)
Anderton
Since you didn't dispute any of my facts, I'll move on to your next question.
Since you don't speak in an official capacity, how do we know they're facts? Anderton The answer depends if that potential/existing user wants to look at the company's history, or the past few months. It also depends on whether they view the forum (which has participation from Cakewalk staff) as a viable support option That is a matter of opinion and cannot be argued objectively. There are not nearly enough dedicated, official Cakewalk staff here, in my opinion. I'm going to bail on this thread for now. I have nothing but respect and appreciation for your technical prowess, but I hope you can understand how difficult it is to determine whether you're speaking in an official capacity or not.
|
davec69
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 178
- Joined: 2014/11/15 03:43:21
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 14:38:17
(permalink)
Not sure why some people are having trouble getting a response from Cakewalk support, but I can report that my own recent contact with Cakewalk support, on 09/19/16, was answered and resolved rather quickly by Cakewalks support staff. Luckily, my issue, which had to do with the greyed out "Insert Synth" button, was addressed in the next patch. It did however, take a few emails back and forth, to get to point of the problem. All of which were responded to in a timely manner. Just a thought, but maybe the new monthly update model, has put a temporary strain on the number of Cakewalks support staff, available to respond to emails and phone support. It's probably easy for Cakewalk to hire someone to reply to support emails, and take phone calls, but they still need to go to the "code gurus" to get the actual answers to the problems. Those guys are all busy on getting the next update out, which may be the reason for the slower response times. If this is the case, then support should only get better, as more support staff learn the ropes at Cakewalk.
Toshiba P75-A7200 LaptopIntel i7-4700MQ 16GB RAM2 x 1TB Hybrid DrivesWindows 10Sonar Platinum (Last Update)Cakewalk Bandlab (Latest Update)Roland Quad Capture (Bios 1.04 / 1.52 drivers)
|
Tané
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 198
- Joined: 2003/11/08 02:48:26
- Location: Forbes, NSW Australia
- Status: offline
Re: TECH SUPPORT Provided by Mr. Craig Anderton
2016/10/18 15:46:38
(permalink)
Personally I have never found the need to contact Cakewalk support as the forum has been very helpful in answering any questions I needed. I don't agree with any call to boycott Cakewalk products. Just my 2 bits worth.
|
MorganT
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 252
- Joined: 2011/03/17 11:33:16
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 16:07:02
(permalink)
bitman I've never call Cakewalk once in all the years I've used it. Got all my help here.
THambrecht This forum is the best tech support.
Ditto. This forum is the best user support of any software system I use in any venue. I know real problems occur that require true Tech Support - but 100% of the time for me it's been either user error, or something that someone on this forum has helped me solve. This forum is easily worth the price of admission.
________________________ Sonar Platinum / Sweetwater Creation Station i5 @ 3.33 Ghz / 12 GB RAM / 64-bit / Fosusrite Scarlett 18i8 interface
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 16:15:45
(permalink)
I have no doubt that there are some VERY smart people on this forum. Whenever I see a reply from @Anderton, @bitflipper, @mettelus, @brundlefly, to name a few, I almost always click through if the subject looks interesting. (Apologies if I didn't mention your favorite forumite.) If the Forum Hosts and regulars have to shoulder the support burden, I fear that's a pretty tall order considering they have to admit they do not represent Cakewalk in an official capacity. Again, I'm not knocking the forum or anyone here who is helpful. I'm only talking about official Cakewalk support channels which are supposed to be available to us all.
|
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8124
- Joined: 2003/11/05 18:43:11
- Location: Missouri - USA
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 16:48:28
(permalink)
telecharge I have no doubt that there are some VERY smart people on this forum. Whenever I see a reply from @Anderton, @bitflipper, @mettelus, @brundlefly, to name a few, I almost always click through if the subject looks interesting. (Apologies if I didn't mention your favorite forumite.) If the Forum Hosts and regulars have to shoulder the support burden, I fear that's a pretty tall order considering they have to admit they do not represent Cakewalk in an official capacity. Again, I'm not knocking the forum or anyone here who is helpful. I'm only talking about official Cakewalk support channels which are supposed to be available to us all.
I think most folks that run into trouble are more concerned with getting over the hurdle(s) they face than where the help comes from.
Bob -- Angels are crying because truth has died ...Illegitimi non carborundum --Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64 Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 16:55:08
(permalink)
BobF I think most folks that run into trouble are more concerned with getting over the hurdle(s) they face than where the help comes from.
No argument there, except that timeliness and accuracy of information could be an issue. Will you concede that the forum is not a "cure-all" for official Cakewalk support?
|
slyman
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 194
- Joined: 2015/08/31 13:55:12
- Location: Montreal, QC
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 17:13:08
(permalink)
I'm sure that when Cakewalk releases a product or update, it has been tested in and out on various systems and environments. Of course, this doesn't mean no one will ever have issues on their own gear, but that's where this forum is priceless. Often you will get a quicker response as someone else here may be experiencing the same issue or may have found a fix. I know the bakers pay a lot of attention to this forum, so if an issue is reported and confirmed by a significant amount of users, they will act on it. I got my share of software and hardware glitches, but as I mentioned before, I've never had to call Cake's support and have always found answers here. Plus, I was also able to help a few users as well.......
Sonar Platinum, Gigabyte H87-HD3, Intel 4770k, 16Mb Ram, Win 10 Pro, RME Babyface Pro, Roland A-Pro 800, Presonus Studio Channel, Kemper Profiling Amp, Strat/Tele/LesPaul/Taylor 214ce/Dean Cadillac/P-Bass
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 17:23:31
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Dream Logic Audio 2016/10/18 18:51:25
telecharge I have nothing but respect and appreciation for your technical prowess, but I hope you can understand how difficult it is to determine whether you're speaking in an official capacity or not. My official capacity is to say what I think. I've consulted to dozens of companies over the years, from biggies like Microsoft and Sony to tiny start-ups. I have value to them only if I say what I think. With respect to Cakewalk, sometimes that coincides with the "party line," sometimes not. Cakewalk does some things brilliantly, and some things...uh, less brilliantly. They too count on me saying what I think, which I've done as an interested bystander since 2000 and as part of Gibson since 2013; like you, sometimes they agree and sometimes not (usually not, but I can handle it). Also remember that my "defenses" of Cakewalk apply equally to other software companies, because I've worked with virtually all of them. There are plenty of competitors people speak of here in "grass is greener" glowing terms that leave support tickets open for weeks, and whose software has plenty of bugs - and don't do bug hotfixes a week or two later. I don't think any less of them. I know why this happens. People really need to understand once and for all that this is a tiny, low-margin industry with employees who make very little compared to other industries, and do what they do primarily because they love their work. You wouldn't expect to give someone $10, tell them to go to a liquor store, and then be disappointed they didn't bring back a 1979 Dom Perignon. Life just doesn't work that way. It's demoralizing for the people creating the code at any music software company when all they hear from their clientele is "it's not enough." But to keep it in the context of Cakewalk for now, just in this forum you'll find comments along the lines of... "I want excellent but free support." "I want nothing but bug fixes, I don't need new features." "I want new features." "I want a better staff view." "I want SONAR to equal dedicated beat-making programs in terms of beat-making." "I want a Mac version." "I want the things in the features and requests forum to be implemented." "I want ARA integration with VocALign." "I want new control surface plug-ins for all the new controllers out there." "I want Note Expression." "I don't want to pay $199 for lifetime updates, I want a special price because I've been using SONAR for a long time" "I want a chord track." "I don't want a workaround that solves my issue, I want a dedicated feature" "I want to register an ancient version of SONAR that Cakewalk doesn't support and runs on an operating system Microsoft doesn't support, Oh, and I've lost the serial number and original disc" "I want a complete PDF manual with all the updates every month, I don't want to go online for help." "I want a Platinum feature in Professional because it's an important feature." "I want SONAR to be compatible with all plug-ins, even the third party ones done by some guy in his basement." ...and so on. Folks, it ain't all gonna happen. Period. What you'll get is Cakewalk [feel free to strike out that name and put in the name of any other music software company] juggling to implement as much as they, for as many people as they can, using whatever resources they can. My thoughts are based on decades in this industry. Perhaps that's why I appreciate when a company decides to go through tough times in order to maintain free support, instead of taking the approach of some companies that's essentially "the easiest way to cut our support load is to charge money and make it a profit center." Cakewalk could have done that, but they didn't. I'm sure some people will applaud that decision, while others will condemn it. But the bottom line is they felt it was the right thing to do and based on a long-term industry perspective, I think Cakewalk was probably right to sacrifice five months of negative comments from being caught off-guard in favor of positive future comments about how cool it is that Cakewalk still does free support. (Of course, if users want that to continue, they have to do their part too - like use support only if the other avenues of support, like FAQs and the online help, don't have an answer. For example, think of how many "support" posts would not have been necessary if people had read the eZine.) As to this forum not being a "proper" kind of official support, this forum is about "we," not "I." It's a community. It's not only about "I can't get support," it's about "We'll help you." Which, in my opinion, is a good thing and I wish I saw more of that attitude in the world at large.
|
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8124
- Joined: 2003/11/05 18:43:11
- Location: Missouri - USA
- Status: offline
Re: NO MORE TECH SUPPORT FROM CAKEWALK
2016/10/18 17:42:54
(permalink)
telecharge
BobF I think most folks that run into trouble are more concerned with getting over the hurdle(s) they face than where the help comes from.
No argument there, except that timeliness and accuracy of information could be an issue. Will you concede that the forum is not a "cure-all" for official Cakewalk support?
I don't recall having read or saying anything about the forum being the only necessary avenue for support. I'm not sure what your mission is. Bakers have commented several times, Anderton has commented - just exactly what is it you think is left to be said? They're working on ramping up their support staff. What more is there to discuss?
Bob -- Angels are crying because truth has died ...Illegitimi non carborundum --Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64 Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U
|
Tané
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 198
- Joined: 2003/11/08 02:48:26
- Location: Forbes, NSW Australia
- Status: offline
Re: TECH SUPPORT Provided by Mr. Craig Anderton
2016/10/18 17:58:27
(permalink)
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: TECH SUPPORT Provided by Mr. Craig Anderton
2016/10/18 18:58:15
(permalink)
I view this thread as a huge mistake. It is based on not enough information and is extremely accusatory in nature. Once the full issue was related to the forum Craig was able to answer it in my view in as highly diplomatic an answer I think I have ever seen. It was to me a wonderful moment that makes me proud of this forum. Man, I am so glad Mr. Anderton is on our side!
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: TECH SUPPORT Provided by Mr. Craig Anderton
2016/10/18 19:21:43
(permalink)
John I view this thread as a huge mistake. It is based on not enough information and is extremely accusatory in nature. Once the full issue was related to the forum Craig was able to answer it in my view in as highly diplomatic an answer I think I have ever seen. It was to me a wonderful moment that makes me proud of this forum. Man, I am so glad Mr. Anderton is on our side!
I agree that the OP is way over the top. It looks like this thread was bumped by an Australian gentleman who likely found this thread via searching Anderton's name. He likely did not bother reading the OP or understand the thread title is meant to be sarcastic. I am not choosing sides. I am a customer advocate, but I still want Cakewalk to be better than it is.
|