Wibbles
No, it means that anything that they have to say is best ignored, as is anyone relying on them as a source.

Well then, lets just beat terrorism by pretending it doesnt exist it and accusing anyone who opposes it as being racists. How dare anyone actually try to take terrorism seriously! 

Beepster
And now we've got Bhav heaping on the straw.
 
Why didn't this guy get permabanned?

Why wont you leave me alone?
 

 
And how does your constant whining about me not count as a personal vendetta by this point?
 
 

Beepster
Why won't you stop posting mind numbingly stupid crap?
 
Seriously... you have proven to be completely ill equipped to even understand the basics of a subject as complex as international terrorism let alone discuss it in any intelligent manner.

Technically the subject of this thread doesnt actually specify terrorism, it could relate to any current trends in the UK such as why I cant find a suitable house.
 
Also 'Jihad' terrorism is incredibly easy to understand. Such people are indoctrinated to be incredibly anti western and to hate all people that do not follow their faith. The main reason why such beliefs have managed to find their way into modern society is due to ignoring them while the seeds are planted under the guise of multi culturalism and then being surprised when they reach fruition. 
 
And everyone here posts mind numbingly stupid crap, I thought you'ld be used to it by now.

Beepster
See? Mind numbingly simplistic and peppered with irrational/illogical conclusions.
 
Also breaching the TOS in any number of ways.
 
*smoochers*

Actually I cant see at all how it does, but you definitely breach it.

Beepster
*yawn*

'Posting senseless, inane, or empty messages to increase your post count, or simply to aggravate, is not only dumb but is not allowed'.

Beepster
Oh... WOW!
 
Please report me for that.
 
The irony would be orgasmic.
 
lulz

Well ok. Since you asked.

Wibbles
For those of you outside of the UK who don't know what the Daily Mail is like, don't bother following that link.
 
It is the vilest of the vile. During the 1930s, they were all in favour of fascism. Now, they are more than happy to make stuff up to support their agenda.
 
Earlier this year Wikipedia editors voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming it “generally unreliable”. The editors described the ban as “centred on the Daily Mail’s reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism and flat-out fabrication”.
 

 
And during the worst years of Stalin's regime of murder and starvation, the New York Times printed gushing articles on the man and the Soviet system. Today I even see kids walking around wearing t-shirts bearing the hammer and sickle emblem of the Soviets, and you can bet your ass that among the hallowed halls of your favorite "liberal" newspapers you will find journalists who have Marxist tendencies and who openly support the Cuban regime and have a poster of Che Guevara up in the office. They will also quite happily print positive statistics on Cuba which have come from the totalitarian regime itself (which is in no way transparent)  and are clearly untrustworthy. Michael Moore made a movie on the "superiority" of Cuban health care which, similarly, was based purely on what the communist regime of Cuba fed him (in particular, it's "potemkin" hospitals which are nothing like the hospitals that ordinary poor Cubans are forced to use, out of the way of naive Western eyes). Such bullcrap is routinely peddled as the "truth" by media sources who get away with their propaganda and lies because they're of the "correct" political persuasion. 
 
As for the Daily Mail's "ban" from Wikipedia - a website which is in no way shape or form a reliable source on anything - well, the Daily Mail itself wrote an article which exposed the truth about how that came about. Wikipedia is one of those highly questionable sources of information which has managed to burrow itself into people's minds as a byword for accuracy, in the same way as Google has become a byword for internet searches. 
 
 
 

*Beep!*

craigb
*Beep!*

Beepster
And now we've got Bhav heaping on the straw.
 
Why didn't this guy get permabanned?

 
Beeps, I find the old block button makes for a much more pleasurable forum experience...
 

Beepster
 
Captain Bumblefart
 
 

 

Hey, at least I gave you the rank of Captain.

OK Chaps and Chapess this thread is getting far to personal so I am going to lock it.