For newbies (a broad overview of many topics)

Page: < 1234 > Showing page 2 of 4
Author
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 02:24:09 (permalink)
1- Clipping the converters and creating unwanted digital distortion, thus ruining a perfect take. I would say peaking a -3dBFS is just too close for comfort. I've ruined my share of takes by tracking this hot because I didn't know any better and went with the analog philosophy in a digital world (just bad).


Maybe we are kind of saying different things. I wasn't necessarily saying *try* to peak at -3dB. Definitely the -9dB to -6dB level is preferable, and plenty hot in the 24 bit world. If you are tracking a very peaky instrument and the player isn't really consistent, then definitely you should bring it down more to avoid clipping. If you get an occasional peak up above -6dB or your are only peaking at -12dB, there's nothing to panic about there really either way. If you are tracking drums, you may want to be more conservative to avoid clipping. If you are tracking a softer, less peaky instrument and/or the player is really consistent, then it's less of an issue.
post edited by droddey - 2007/12/27 02:44:39

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#31
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 03:13:53 (permalink)
Dean,

I know what you were saying and I agree with you completely. My response was towards what mgh said about guidelines. I wanted to stress this because it's something I had to learn the hardway myself, and I wished I had someone tell me about it before.

This thread is gonna help a lot of people, so I'm glad you started it. It should be a sticky for sure.

Take care!
#32
Parsley
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 32
  • Joined: 2005/05/25 12:40:11
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 05:41:22 (permalink)
I agree about recording at a low enough level to avoid a risk of getting digital clipping, but if you've already got recordings at eg -2 presumably you could just reduce the track gains on the faders / envelopes to leave room for mixing?
post edited by Parsley - 2007/12/27 05:54:59
#33
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 06:33:49 (permalink)
There's a problem with that. Gain will work after the fact of the the recorded signal. Your levels need to set by the hardware. Do not rely on after the fact gain or fader adjustments to get rid of any possible clipping.
post edited by John - 2007/12/27 06:47:27

Best
John
#34
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 11:12:04 (permalink)
nit, nit, nit, nit, there's another one, pick that nit

Don't listen to those guys, Dean, you done good.

Even if you didn't mention the importance of expensive boutique cables, tweeters that go over 20KHz, always recording at 192KHz, and that tube mics make everyone sound good.


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#35
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 11:25:04 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Parsley

I agree about recording at a low enough level to avoid a risk of getting digital clipping, but if you've already got recordings at eg -2 presumably you could just reduce the track gains on the faders / envelopes to leave room for mixing?



Yes you could but after recording an instrument so hot you'd have to lower its volume a lot in order for it to fit in with the other instruments without clipping the Master Bus. To me this is just counter-intuitive. It's like driving fast on a street full of traffic lights only to realize you're not moving any faster than the other cars since they catch up to you the moment you get stoped by one of those traffic lights. In the end you're not moving any faster so just reduce the speed and save some gass .

Then there's what John said about not being able to get rid of clipping after it's been recorded. Sometimes clipping is obvious but sometimes it goes by so fast you don't even hear it at first. If you track lower then you don't have to worry about this and have the peace of mind that your recordings are withing the safety limits. Ain't that worth something?

I hope this answeres your question.


Take care!
#36
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 11:26:25 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: bitflipper

nit, nit, nit, nit, there's another one, pick that nit

Don't listen to those guys, Dean, you done good.

Even if you didn't mention the importance of expensive boutique cables, tweeters that go over 20KHz, always recording at 192KHz, and that tube mics make everyone sound good.





#37
jnz
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 337
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 12:23:55
  • Location: 40º N 74º W
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 11:35:40 (permalink)
Jnz, this seems a nice link (i've bookmarked it) ... but it doesn't seem to me to address the weighty 24-bit paradigm in the way Dean just did.

lol - True, but if you browse the site's forums (studio-central.com/phpbb/index.php), you'll find a few thousand topics on the 24-bit issue. This topic, in particular, has 265 replies and counting. The agreed upon level is 0dBVU, which in most systems is calibrated to -18 or -16 dBFS RMS. The PEAK should preferably be no higher than -9 dBFS.

That site (and its forums) has quite a few mixing/mastering engineers with professional studios, and users from pretty much every sequencer on the planet (from FL Studio to ProTools HD, and everything in between).
post edited by jnz - 2007/12/27 11:53:55
#38
Oaf_Topik
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2105
  • Joined: 2007/12/07 17:11:26
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 11:36:15 (permalink)
Bump - Sticky Please


If Cake doesn't sticky this, then everyone here should just give this thread a bump every once in a while to keep it on the front page.

#39
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8594
  • Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
  • Location: betwixt and between
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 14:45:03 (permalink)
whoops i seem to have inadvertently started something, i did say it was a great piece by Dean, all i was trying to say in reply to Philippe was that if it's working now, then you've done all this stuff intuitively. a lot of people work it out for themselves. also if you are doing minimalist pieces, say vocal and acoustic, you can get away with recording a hotter signal...

you must have spent hours on this Dean, great job!!!

Memorare debut album 'Philistine' available now http://blackwoodproductio...philistine-digipack-cd
#40
jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 21760
  • Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
  • Location: SW Scotland
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/27 15:04:11 (permalink)
whoops i seem to have inadvertently started something


Typical scouser.....


Dean - good on you sir, that's an excellent piece of work, well thought out and well written.
post edited by jamesg1213 - 2007/12/27 15:18:14

 
Jyemz
 
 
 



Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
#41
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4062
  • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/28 11:39:19 (permalink)
Thank you immensely, Jose, Dean, Mark,

It now seems perfectly clear (to me), considering all the variables (mixing, converting, mastering, dithering, etc.), in our 24-bit world, which guides (-6dBFS or so) are a valid clipping paradigm during tracking-recording.

Philip  
(Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
#42
Telecaster
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 523
  • Joined: 2005/01/31 20:17:23
  • Location: Derbyshire, UK
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/28 18:34:22 (permalink)
Friendly Bump for sticky

Cheers
Mike
PC I7 3770k, 16Gb ram build to Jim Roseberry specs.
Sonar X3 PE, Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 , Edirol PCR-800.
#43
contact@jondunn.org
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 767
  • Joined: 2005/10/30 17:47:05
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/28 18:44:15 (permalink)
discussing the clip levels is worthwhile(Dean, your writing has elictied deep thought)

there have been several recent threads addressing, indirectly, the use of compressors or the likes in a portable/stationary recording situation where clip levels or adjusting for the likes is without a doubt a major consideration
within one of these threads a Canadian user suggested that he never uses compressors while tracking live...

which made me wonder after a recent session where the jazz drummer got quite excited during a Monk tune, and let out a snare hit that... bing spiked a level!

regards,

-JD
post edited by contact@jondunn.org - 2008/04/02 17:39:09
#44
contact@jondunn.org
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 767
  • Joined: 2005/10/30 17:47:05
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/29 02:58:52 (permalink)
bump
#45
AdamFH
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 930
  • Joined: 2007/02/12 03:25:01
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/29 03:02:00 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: bitflipper

nit, nit, nit, nit, there's another one, pick that nit

Don't listen to those guys, Dean, you done good.

Even if you didn't mention the importance of expensive boutique cables, tweeters that go over 20KHz, always recording at 192KHz, and that tube mics make everyone sound good.



Yep, he em done did it good. You know how I don't like to speak no very well grammar.
#46
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2007/12/29 11:40:19 (permalink)
Bump 4 sticky

To cakewalk - if and when you sticky this, can you put it in the GT forum too?

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#47
mxpressuk
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Joined: 2005/01/12 14:50:45
  • Location: Nottingham UK
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/01/16 12:50:28 (permalink)
Busses, Sends, and Track Routing

thanks for this I have actually been using sonar for some time (currently sonar pe5 - I'm hoping to catch up when the finances allow it) but some of the stuff here I just didn't know how to do so thanks once again
regards peter
#48
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 14:19:16 (permalink)
SteveStrummer,

I got your PM, but couldn't respond because it tells me I can't post to messages so quickly in succession, despite the fact that I've posted no messages since yesterday. But anyway, yeh, you can post this in your other forum if you wanna.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#49
techead
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4353
  • Joined: 2004/01/24 08:40:20
  • Location: Macomb, IL, USA
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 14:32:17 (permalink)
Great material here. I added a link to this forum post onto the SONAR User Wiki in the Tutorial Section.
#50
Stevethesearcher
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 671
  • Joined: 2008/01/20 17:48:05
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 15:42:44 (permalink)
Droddey-Outstanding post.

I dont mind admitting that I didnt know what a Bus meant.

Its a pity that you didnt write the Sonar printed Manual that I read.

Your post has given me a better understanding of the whole process.
#51
Steevo
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 80
  • Joined: 2008/03/25 16:21:19
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 15:59:18 (permalink)
droddey, first lemme say thanks for the killer knowledge you just broke off!! and second you should of charged us some money to read it lol. I saved your post to "favorites" so I can refresh my memory of the golden words. thanks again, Steevo
#52
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 16:02:13 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: droddey

SteveStrummer,

I got your PM, but couldn't respond because it tells me I can't post to messages so quickly in succession, despite the fact that I've posted no messages since yesterday. But anyway, yeh, you can post this in your other forum if you wanna.



Dean - top man!

Thanks a bunch for that, it's really appreciated.

Steve

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#53
SongCraft
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3902
  • Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 16:52:52 (permalink)
Great write up Dean :)

+1 . I agree your post/topic should be a sticky! And also added to Wiki

Dean you have pointed a lot of users in the right direction. Even though the title is aimed at newbies, as the old saying goes 'we all learn something new' no matter how experienced because often it's good to get a different perspective from people who are experienced, it's a great way of learning something new, various different techniques, even some of us hadn't thought about. A good way of developing and broadening ones own skills is to keep an open mind, IMO this is important. This is a perfect example of what makes this forum awesome.

Thanks!

 
 
#54
aaronk
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1275
  • Joined: 2005/12/09 16:33:31
  • Location: HT&E
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 17:19:39 (permalink)
Great job, Dean. This is a very well written piece.

With only a little expansion, I think you've written what should be a prominently placed piece on the Cakewalk site, since it will answer what seems like half the questions posted on the forums, in a de-mystifying, non-holier-than-thou way.

A few little suggestions, please take these as being offered in "friendly editor" mode --

(1) If you added a front-end section on microphones and a section on monitors/room treatment, I think you'd have the whole topic covered! From your posts on your own adventures in room treatment it looks like you could probably write an awfully good guide on that.

(2) Personally, I'd urge any home studio to be set up with the ability to record stereo (i.e., at least two pre-amps and one pair of matching mikes). It comes in handy quite often, and is also just fun. I've also found that making simultaneous mono recordings from side-by-side mikes is a good way to train my ear about how my different microphones respond.

(3) I've pardoned all spelling issues per your advice, except one: a "buss" is the kiss on the cheek I give the singer for a take well done. A "bus" is where I route a track.
#55
syaodzir
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 40
  • Joined: 2005/12/11 16:14:49
  • Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 17:43:16 (permalink)
Thanks very much dean, very helpful.

Btw, my 'computer name' is Quark. (well i laughed)

AMD X2 4600, ASRock 939Dual-Sata2, 2GB DDR400, 2 x 80GB PATA, 2 x 250GB SATA, 1 x 500GB SATA II, E-mu 1820m @ 24-bit/48kHz, Korg 05R/W, Edirol PCR-800, Sonar 7.0.2 PE, XP PRO 32 & 64 Bit, LFS GNU/Linux
#56
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 18:14:38 (permalink)
3) I've pardoned all spelling issues per your advice, except one: a "buss" is the kiss on the cheek I give the singer for a take well done. A "bus" is where I route a track


Actually, most people spell it wrong. According to the experts, it's really a buss, not a bus. Though, if you search for 'signal buss' on Google you really only find 'signal bus'. And, interestingly, in the dictionary, neither bus nor buss is indicated as meaning something that a signal travels over, but it's always been called a 'buss' in studio'ese.

I'm not sure how they got that terminology, but 'buss' is the correct term for them. I don't know why Sonar labels them as 'bus' necessarily. Maybe there's no fully accepted spelling, but generally if you use 'bus', the old timers will make fun of you. If you search on google for Audio Buss or mixing buss, you find it always using that spelling.

Anyone have a definitive answer for this?
post edited by droddey - 2008/03/28 18:43:46

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#57
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 19:02:38 (permalink)
I updated the first post to include sound cards and microphones and room treatment.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#58
TTY TECH
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 274
  • Joined: 2008/03/05 00:37:59
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 21:26:32 (permalink)
working on a drum track as 1st track of project, have to lasten to the different beats, drum paint tool works, i try em out cause i dontknow what they are gonna do, they play back, a few measures at a time. some of the patterns totally scc used with others, and some are how do you say da bomb?. did i get that rite?.. anyway, it takes a long time to get a good drum track, they rtake longer then anything else for me, i guess i am not much of a drummer, i have written a few tunes with tuned drums,
a while back i was using the midi generator on a blaster card, oh my god, what was that god awfull sound.
but th esound font files are quick to use for a sample for me to hear the differnt beats before i write the audio tk then juyust b4 i rite audio tk, change to soft synth. ucasue they use the processor. the sound font files do not. i was on a p4 tho back then.
if i export a drum track all by its slone some self, you can hear it playing the tune. interesting effect. ever do that? wayne out in sf ca usa
i need this screen signing off
post edited by TTY TECH - 2008/03/28 21:46:08
#59
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5506
  • Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
  • Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
  • Status: offline
RE: For newbies (a broad overview of many topics) 2008/03/28 21:44:46 (permalink)
Thanks for the update, Dean. Somehow, I missed this last Christmas. I think I was too busy opening presents with the family to log in that day (is that even possible? ), and as fast as this forum moves, it must have slid off page 1 too fast for me to catch that week!

Anyway, great job, Dean. Between this and Eratu's post, it's like Mammoth DAW Post Week around here.
post edited by losguy - 2008/03/28 22:02:25

Psalm 30:12
All pure waves converge at the Origin
#60
Page: < 1234 > Showing page 2 of 4
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1