CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 00:33:17
(permalink)
My sound is the same as it was 20 years ago. just more expensive stuff making the same sound....Chung, chung , chung, chang. <-----thats not chinese, that sthe sound of my guitar... CJ
|
ZenFly
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 173
- Joined: 2005/04/23 10:54:07
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 00:41:06
(permalink)
I've been using ''''gasp'''' modelers for 5 years now, a vg8ex and a H&K zenTera direct. I've been playing guitar for 43 years and have owned many fine tube amps, but none recorded better than my zenTera. ESPECIALLY in my little tiny bedroom studio. Sure, if I had a recording budget I'd be in a nice big room with tons of amps, mics pres etc. but for what I do, this works. Use whatever works for you!
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 01:16:05
(permalink)
It is true that you can get really nice sounds from a amp modeler, but he asked for professional guitar sounds. Now I know you're not gonna say that most professional guitar players use amp modelers when they record their tracks for a CD. There are some things you can't do with an amp modeler that you can with a real amp, i.e. how about those nice feedbacks. Just the power you get from a nice tube amp is priceless. No matter how you look at it, digital is digital and analog is analog, and they both have their goods and bads. This is not directed to anyone in particular just in case  .
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 01:24:26
(permalink)
Jose, this is an argument nobody can win. its just gonna go back and forth. I use a guitar processor(my vox or boss) and run that into my amp(fender pro 185) and mic the amp and record 2 tracks at the same time.. one is just the processor and one is the mic from the amp from the processor.....did you follow that.. I do that about 50% of the time.. There are also some things you can do with a processor that you cant do with an amp and visa versa. This thread is going to out live me. CJ
|
DigiDis
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 170
- Joined: 2004/01/14 05:23:43
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 01:44:22
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Jose7822 Now I know you're not gonna say that most professional guitar players use amp modelers when they record their tracks for a CD. You would be surprised. If an engineer has an ear good enough to get good sound through a mic'ed amp, he will also be able to get great tones out of a PODxt. Then I hear often that engineers let guitarists play through whatever they want but record a dry signal and then process it in ProTools using Line6 Amp Farm. I read an interview with Nickleback that clearly stated they did this for the "The Long Road" CD. By the way, that has some of the finest guitar tone I ever heard. I think many don't want to admit that their CDs were made with a POD instead of a real amp. And more often you will find in live gigs that many guitarists are using a wall of empty marshalls and going direct to PA with a POD.
|
stratton
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1446
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:49:24
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 01:45:53
(permalink)
Now I know you're not gonna say that most professional guitar players use amp modelers when they record their tracks for a CD. Most, possibly not. But a LOT of them do. That is a fact, and has been for a few years. Discuss it all you want to, but facts are facts. I was talking to a recording engineer friend in Nashville about the gear a famous (as session players go) guitar player who showed up at the studio with a Tele and a laptop. Sounded just like he was playing through his old Vox AC30s. Of course, he sounds killer playing through anything and has programmed his sounds, but there you go. It's more common every day. The sounds of modeled gear, whether it's amps, audio gear, or even the guitars themselves, are filling the airwaves all the time.
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 01:50:53
(permalink)
Guitar amps now have modelers in them. Not all, but alot of them, and im laughing at the person who is playing through it while denownsing Hardware effect processors. There the same thing but with speakers... CJ
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 02:46:26
(permalink)
I personally don't use lots of FX if any. What I said here is just based on what I use and my opinion, not to change the way anyone here gets their sound. If you're happy with what you use then cool. The important thing is that you're happy about your sound  . I don't listen to Nickleback and is not the music I cater for either. For me real guitar sounds are more raw sounding ones (which might be different for you). Like SRV, Killswitch Engage, Blues Saraceno, Metallica (old), VH, Lee Ritenour, Pat Metheny, Russel Malone, Eric Johnson (I don't really like hes guitar playing that much but I do like his clean sounds), etc. You get the idea. I do like other guitarist that use a lot of FX like Vernon Reid or Scott Henderson (he just has an amazing tone in those fingers). Generally, thats the type of sound I like which, again, is probably different from what you like. Bets to you all  . EDIT: No I don't wanna bet with you all, but you know what I meant.
post edited by Jose7822 - 2007/02/13 03:26:37
|
DigiDis
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 170
- Joined: 2004/01/14 05:23:43
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 02:56:06
(permalink)
This has always been a subject that interests me. This is my take on everything, YMMV. I am 42 and have been playing electric guitar since my 6th birthday. I have had more equipment than I can imagine, and have wasted more time of my life than I want to admit tweaking to find that "perfect tone". I later realized perfection does not exist in an imperfect world. Did you ever notice that only guitarists get into this debate? The rest of the world doesn't give a rat's a$$ how the guitarists tone was made, wouldn't notice the difference, and would rather the guitarist spent more time improving his talent and less searching for that perfect tone that just doesn't exist. As I finally mature, I am learning that tone is just a very small part of a greater thing called music. Mozart's piano sonatas sound great on grand pianos, upright pianos, my Roland NS364's piano patch and even played by midi through Kontakt using their aweful Steinway Light sampleset. Why? Because tone is just a small part of what makes music magical.
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 02:56:53
(permalink)
Pat Metheny, Eric Johnson...Jose, i have'nt seen those names in a long time. I used to love Pat, He rips... CJ
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 03:09:39
(permalink)
Pat is the shiza!!! I've seen both Pats play live a couple of times. But Metheny definitely has his own sound and his playing is superior no doubt. Love the phrasing!
|
thndrsn
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 475
- Joined: 2005/03/12 21:41:27
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 03:24:19
(permalink)
Hi all, I currently have several options, including an SM57 in front of a Fender Twin Reverb, a DI box, a Peavey Rockmaster, a Rocktron Gainiac I, and other FX boxes and techniques, and for the next option ... my next piece of guitar electronics is going to be the Womanizer from these guys: http://www.damagecontrolusa.com/productsmain.htm The audio demos are convincing. (Or a Fender Blues Junior. These both have their merits.) BTW, I like that suggestion of using several mics and correcting phase delay by time-shifting in SONAR. Very clever. Hadn't thought of that. Brilliant, actually. Will definately ty it. I've used several mics before, but not with the time-shifting thing. OHH! I like that idea!! --thndrsn
Beethoven was right: the bigger the stream, the deeper the tone.
|
jamvanman
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 48
- Joined: 2005/04/25 05:26:44
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 03:28:14
(permalink)
Cut the bass frequencies. I find that soloed the guitar sounds great but you need to roll of the bass frequencies to get it to sit nicely in the mix. (Still learning this lesson, actually.)
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 03:33:47
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: jamvanman Cut the bass frequencies. I find that soloed the guitar sounds great but you need to roll of the bass frequencies to get it to sit nicely in the mix. (Still learning this lesson, actually.) Cut in what....What song are you talking about
|
thndrsn
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 475
- Joined: 2005/03/12 21:41:27
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 04:10:54
(permalink)
I assume he means cut some bass from the guitar track in any song mix which has other instruments that generate in that range of frequencies. It's good general advice that may or may not apply in a given situation, but usually does to some degree, the more so the larger the mix. --thndrsn
Beethoven was right: the bigger the stream, the deeper the tone.
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 04:20:45
(permalink)
Thats too general, That does not go for every song. Sometimes you want that bass in your guitar. Sounds thick.. what im getting at, there are no rules and there should never be. /what i do somtimes id record 2 guiatrs one from an amp and one from my Voxtonelab. the guitar frommy amp ihas alot of lmid to low end in it and the guitar from my vox tonelab has more of a low to high midrang. I record them on seperate track and bring the up, The sound makes me cream in my well nevermind that. I would not cut any lows frommy guitars, I will fit the bass in there some how. I will pan each guiat hard left and the other guitar hard right. The bass and the bass drum have the center of the song so show thru... Im starting to talk jiberish right now, I get great results my ways so i dont like people telling to cut the lows. How many freqencies are in the low spectrun, Theres alot. If you cut the wrong one your doomed,..Poeple record crap into the pc thinking that sonar has some magic tools. It doesnt. The guitarist has the majic toolsYou should get your sound right before you press record ................. im on a rant, its time for me to go to bed later, CJ
post edited by CJaysMusic - 2007/02/13 05:25:17
|
thndrsn
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 475
- Joined: 2005/03/12 21:41:27
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 04:54:01
(permalink)
Thats too general, That does not go for every song. Yeah, okay, whatever. Let's quibble about it. good general advice that may or may not apply --thndrsn P.S. You forgot the apostrophe.
Beethoven was right: the bigger the stream, the deeper the tone.
|
StuH
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 376
- Joined: 2006/07/28 21:00:50
- Location: Yukon Territory, Canada
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 04:56:52
(permalink)
I like Guitar Rig 2 some of my thoughts on how to make it sound better. 1. Know the basics 2. Record dry and monitor wet. 3. Thicken your tracks by cloning them. 4. Create your own presets and/or tweak the included presets. 5. Experiment by mixing with other good quality plugins you may have.
Sonar Platinum Windows 10 Home 12.0 GB RAM Intel Core i7 - 4770 @ 3.40GHz 3.40GHz M-Audio Fast Track Ultra
|
artsoul
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1985
- Joined: 2005/11/22 18:32:49
- Location: glasgow, scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 07:31:46
(permalink)
I use GR2 and am constantly blown away by it BUT not as it ships with the presets. it does seem really sensitive to picking strength, touch etc. more so than a real amp. If you take the time to explore it , it will give you results. plus I can get on a plane with a guitar and a laptop and take a full setup to sessions.
|
stratcat
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 601
- Joined: 2004/01/02 10:06:34
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 08:17:20
(permalink)
I haven't done any serious recording, so my opinion here probably doesn't count for much, but it's still fun to jump in.. I think that for me it would boil down to this : You can't get the "feel" of a real amp turned up and moving air and you actually feeling the vibration in your hands and through your body. And that feel carries over into how I play and how the guitar reacts, sustains, etc. It would take a nice big powerful monitroing system to run an amp sim through to aproach that experience. But recording a real amp with never give you the control over your tone that an amp sim does after the fact and in the mix of a recording. So the best scenerio would be to use both as some have suggested some of the pros are now doing. But for many of us, recording a real amp cranked up at home is not always possible or at least practicle. I have ended up with some guitar tracks going direct with my old Yamaha DG Stomp (digital modeler) that I was very happy with. And I expect to get even better results with the Guitar Combos package I just bought (and have still not found time to install and play with!!!).
Stratcat Sonar PE 6.2.1 P4 2.8c
|
marcos69
Max Output Level: -26 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4950
- Joined: 2004/11/05 21:44:33
- Location: Between my guitar and amp
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 12:02:52
(permalink)
To really get a "professional" guitar sound you probably need a "professional" studio. I personally could never record at home at the kind of volume levels necessary to get proper speaker excursion and cabinet involvement to accurately record distorted guitar.
|
Zig
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 235
- Joined: 2004/06/20 10:20:39
- Location: Currently residing Gloucs; UK
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 12:33:07
(permalink)
Man, I love these forums! Excellent stuff as usual. In reply to the poster(sorry, busy going thru all the other replies), I think GR and Amplitube are excellent tools in a very wide box. My own take is generally to put any "wet" fx afterwards, post-recording, yet I have to say in terms of drive/distortion I invariably get this in at the front end(v. my comments about phrasing/shaping and using the o.d./sustain element in forming the runs). I don't know if this is a help but I post on the Bare Knuckle Pickup site as zigmund: I've uploaded 2 "tracks" there on the Players forum I recently submitted done on my Yamaha SG...these were done on a Pod XT in the same way as I've described(overdrive at front end, echo/reverb once in Sonar); if it's not bothersome to trawl around, these might be a help as they illustrate what I'm trying to say.
|
artsoul
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1985
- Joined: 2005/11/22 18:32:49
- Location: glasgow, scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 12:47:48
(permalink)
I just checked out the womanizer on the damage control site damn they all sound good :)
|
stratton
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1446
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:49:24
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 13:01:31
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: marcos69 stratton, is that a picture of heaven I'm looking at? I'm envious. mottull, I think your answer is use what works for you. By the many different answers here you can tell that there is no one way to get good results. Compare stratton's setup (which I would die for) to mine. I play through a digitech processor directly into the soundcard. No amp or software amp sims. You can click my sig to listen. Some of my stuff sounds over modeled, but part of that is me still learning to record. Hey Marcos, thanks a lot. Heaven? You know I love these amps and having them all lined up ready to go is WAY cool. On the other hand, if I can't get a tone, there's no one or nothing to blame but myself, which is it's own kind of hell! Seriously, I bought all of these amps to do a specific thing or two. Some of them happen to be very versatile, but I bought them after listening to records, hearing tones I liked and finding out what was used to record the sounds. BTW, that includes the POD.
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 20:48:03
(permalink)
I listened to some of the guitar recordings mentioned above and I like them... but its certainly apples and oranges. It seems like the digital modeling is really good at getting that vintage Quadraverb/ Yamaha SPX sound...from about 20-25 years ago... but that's not tha same as "make you humbucker sound like a single coil" "series/parallel britsh cabinet" "classic caifornia clean" etc etc that digital modeling optimistaclly offers to the aspiring guitarist. If you have the time or inclination you might enjoy hearing some analog style guitar I recorded a while ago with Cakewalk 9 on a Win98/Wave 4 sytem. They are hiding out on my webpage here: http://www.harmoniccycle.com/hc/music-05-songs.htm FWIW, I know I am not a good guitarist... I am a jack of all trades, master of none type guy :-). These recordings are improvisational jams that I laid over some chord progressions "composed" using Jammer Pros automated features. I used the auto looping features in Cakewalk and then "mixed" the various takes in layers. The MIDI tracks are very MIDI :-) but here's the point: The guitar sound is from an small single ended 6V6 Fender "Champ" clone I built for fun. I was playing the amp thru 2 circa 1950's 8 ohm Rola speakers wired in parallel for a 4 ohm load. The speakers were rescued from a Baldwin organ that was done for. I have never played a "creamier" set of speakers. Various distortion and envelope filter pedal efx were used. At the time I was alternating between a '92 Gibson SG special and a '66 Martin GT70 Hollowbody electric (very similar to Gretsch, same hardware, pickups etc.) I either miced with a AKG 414 or a SM58, sometimes a 57. I just don't think you can get these sounds with a sim anything... It's not like I don't like playing my buddies Zoom pedal when he visits ... but :-) My current fascination is Playing a Warmoth parts Strat clone I strung up with flatwounds and hooked up a set of Lindy Fralin "real 54 alnico III" pickups. I play it thru a '70 Fender Champ with a custom Weber VST speaker. I set everything at 10 play some rhythm chords... it's imediately apparent this combo is a classic. It's just chimey and clean and pure with a little quack and bark when you dig in for some solo work. I know I am being a pest here but it's cause I get so disappointed when I stop by the guitar stores and see the total lack of real, honest to goodness guitar amps and speakers. How are aspiring guitarists ever going to find out about the good stuff if someone doesn't make a big deal about it. best regards, mike
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 21:19:53
(permalink)
Everything you said is your opinion. Theres no fact in it. that may work for you and your style. I think your big ramble is a shameless plug get people to listen to you songs. Im calling it how i see it. Sorry. CJ
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 21:33:14
(permalink)
ah gee CJ I was trying to be nice with the vintage quadraverb reference :-) best, mike
|
hockeyjx
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 839
- Joined: 2003/12/09 18:36:28
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 21:51:24
(permalink)
I've been a guitarist for 20+ years and recorded at real studios (and still have my huge rig from back in the day) and I can honestly say there is nothing that I can't do with GR2 that I paid to do in the real studio. Feedback - for instance- isn't a problem, and even if it was - I have an eBow. I did a song with three guitar tracks for a song with 3 different models (and some eq-ing effects and so on) and I am abso-smurfly convinced it really couldn't sound better at real good studio. This from a man who was a mic'ing snob. The versatility of the software is amazing and inspiring. When I recorded with my band; even though we mic'd my guitar, I mostly sat in the control room when laying down the tracks. I found it silly to put on headphones and sit in the room with the amp to feel it. In that respect, it's no different than having GR2 in my house - its coming through a set of monitors. "Modelers and/or VSTs should not be considered." - that quote is sheer madness! Hasn't Tom Scholz (the Boston guitarist and Rockman founder) used modeling on a lot of Boston albums? They sound darn good to me! Like most things on this forum, its about preference - but I guarantee we could record with a sim/modeler and fool about 99% of ppl on this forum in to thinking it was mic'd. Sans the UBER AUDIOPHILES.
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 21:54:46
(permalink)
Nicely said hocketjx..... CJ
|
jweldinger
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 593
- Joined: 2004/01/27 10:49:51
- Status: offline
RE: Getting Proffessional Sound From Guitar
2007/02/13 22:13:44
(permalink)
The mission here is to get killer guitar sound in our recordings. In this case we try to faithfully capture and reproduce the guitar tracks. Naturally, playing a track back through studio monitors is not going to sound the same as a Marshall JMP/1960A when it’s fully cranked. Likewise on other speakers…the 6X9s in your car, the 12 inch stereo speakers in your living room... Modelers try to recreate the sound of professional valve amps. While they do a pretty good job of it, your tracks are only going to sound as good as your source. Some might be happy with that sound. I’m not. I also own a Vox AD50VT which is great for everyday playing, but when I’m live or recording, I want a Marshall valve amp behind me. No modeling amp will sound as good as the real deal at creating the trademark wall of sound or incredible clean tone. It’s not about who you can fool. So, while modeling and VST are great for tracking demos, for professional recordings I’d want the real deal. Think about it. Do you want the valve amp, or do you want the modeler/VST trying to recreate the valve amp sound? As for signal processing, I have never seen the need for FX on the guitar. Just give me the unadulterated sound of a Strat and a Marshall. Regards, Joe
|