icontakt
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4266
- Joined: 2012/03/04 08:18:02
- Location: Tokyo
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/05 08:51:05
(permalink)
dcmg For me, I un-checked the key bindings box, as I want my custom bindings to persist at all times. I believe one could also uncheck the "custom" module in the CB so that it persists in all Lenses. Craig ( or anyone) correct me if I'm wrong there.
If you uncheck the "Custom" module, the Lens simply removes the module from CB, i.e. you won't be able to use the module at all.
Tak T. Primary Laptop: Core i7-4710MQ CPU, 16GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Home Premium OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Secondary Laptop: Core2 Duo CPU, 8GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Professional OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Audio Interface: iD14 (ASIO)Keyboard Controller/MIDI Interface: A-800PRODAW: SONAR Platinum x64 (latest update installed)
|
icontakt
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4266
- Joined: 2012/03/04 08:18:02
- Location: Tokyo
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/05 09:09:54
(permalink)
Andrzej Salm
Anderton
Andrzej Salm The old screenset module was neat, tidy and allowed to access different screensets just by clicking on one of the numbers (1-10) on it. Why was it gotten rid of?
It wasn't! It's still there. I find combining Lenses withe Screen Sets ideal. If you don't like Lenses, set the drop-down menu to "None" and forget about them. I just don't see the reason for all this angst. It's like any other feature: If you don't like it, don't use it. Nothing was taken away.
Well, where is it then? Here is a screenshot: http://imgur.com/a/LHRtj I've actually just updated to 2016.11 again just to check. It's NOT there, so I'll be reverting yet again, unless I'm missing something here...
Thanks for posting the screenshot. It looks like your custom CB layout (which was there in 2016.10 and prior versions) was somehow overwritten by a CB layout of one of the factory lenses. After rolling back to 2016.10, recreate your desired CB layout again and export it (CB layout is stored in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Cakewalk Music Software\SONAR\Platinum\MCBControlBar). Then install 2016.11 and import the layout. It will probably restore your layout successfully, including the Screenset module (I experienced a similar problem, and could solve it by this method). Also, I recommend creating a custom lens (by clicking "Save lens" in the Lens drop-down), in order not to have your CB layout messed up by a factory lens again.
Tak T. Primary Laptop: Core i7-4710MQ CPU, 16GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Home Premium OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Secondary Laptop: Core2 Duo CPU, 8GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Professional OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Audio Interface: iD14 (ASIO)Keyboard Controller/MIDI Interface: A-800PRODAW: SONAR Platinum x64 (latest update installed)
|
Andrzej Salm
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 94
- Joined: 2015/03/17 16:28:52
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/05 14:18:44
(permalink)
Thank you very much, icontakt I really appreciate your help. I am going to stick to 2016.10 though. It all sounds like too much bother to be honest. Hopefully it will be resolved in December. If not, then I'm out. I really miss the old Cakewalk, the one with no take lanes, multidock and all this pointless crap. Perhaps I'm getting old... ;)
Sonar Artist / Waves Gold Bundle / EZdrummer2Win 10 Pro 64i7-6700K / Asus Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1 / 16GB DDR4 3200 / Vega 64Zoom UAC-2 / Avalon U5Warwick Thumb 4BO
|
panup
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2538
- Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/05 14:20:24
(permalink)
John I wonder if CW had called them workspaces would people be more accepting?
I wonder why CW does not call them worspaces. It would sound more intuitive, at least for Adobe users... Or have I missed something? Is 'lens' a widely used replacement for 'workspace' nowadays?
|
panup
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2538
- Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/05 14:29:26
(permalink)
Andrzej Salm I really miss the old Cakewalk, the one with no take lanes, multidock and all this pointless crap. Perhaps I'm getting old... ;)
+0.5. I understand your point (I'm getting older, too) but to be honest, SONAR has taken huge steps forward since MultiDock free and track layers days and I wouldn't call new features as 'pointless crap'. Many people seem to find MultiDock very useful. Also track lanes are good if you don't try to treat them as layers. It took me a long time but now I'm fine with track lanes...
|
icontakt
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4266
- Joined: 2012/03/04 08:18:02
- Location: Tokyo
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/05 21:01:39
(permalink)
Andrzej Salm I really miss the old Cakewalk, the one with no take lanes, multidock and
I hope the Bakers are reading this. Although MultiDock and Take Lanes are both vital for my workflow, I understand some users don't want to use them at all and want to completely remove them (not just hide/collapse). Incidentally, Lenses are designed to allow users to remove features/views that they don't want to use/see, but, unfortunately, both MultiDock and Take Lanes aren't included in the list of removable features/views. Let's hope they will be covered in a future update.
Tak T. Primary Laptop: Core i7-4710MQ CPU, 16GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Home Premium OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Secondary Laptop: Core2 Duo CPU, 8GB RAM, 7200RPM HDD, Windows 7 Professional OS (Japanese) x64 SP1Audio Interface: iD14 (ASIO)Keyboard Controller/MIDI Interface: A-800PRODAW: SONAR Platinum x64 (latest update installed)
|
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5449
- Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
- Location: SE Florida
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/05 21:38:47
(permalink)
Andrzej Salm I really miss the old Cakewalk, the one with no take lanes, multidock and all this pointless crap. Perhaps I'm getting old... ;)
ditto. I don't think age has anything to do with it except to maybe have more common sense and not being impressed by flash over function.
|
millzy
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 890
- Joined: 2005/01/28 20:32:51
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/06 05:32:56
(permalink)
Late to the party here but FWIW, I'm digging lenses. I modified an existing layout by adding a docked synth rack to the browser, time line H:M:S and customized control bar. Saved it as a new lense and it works a treat. I never used screensets for whatever reason, so this is kind of cool!
Millzy i7 3770K, 16gb ram, Samsung EVO SSD, 2 x WD drives, RME Babyface, Win 10 (x64), Cakewalk by Bandlab, heaps of other stuff.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/06 08:47:45
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sijel 2016/12/25 16:28:55
timidi
Andrzej Salm I really miss the old Cakewalk, the one with no take lanes, multidock and all this pointless crap. Perhaps I'm getting old... ;)
ditto. I don't think age has anything to do with it except to maybe have more common sense and not being impressed by flash over function.
I'm very sorry to hear this. What has happened to Sonar Platinum is everything that was once in 8.5 has been restored with much better user interaction. I wont list all the improvements for there are way too many. I will just say that Sonar Platinum is now far and away a better DAW than Sonar 8.5 ever was. We have things now we could only dream about in the past. With the addition of Lenses CW has brought back layouts. In combination with Screensets one has the ability to customize their workspace and workflow to an unprecedented level. I would never give up Pro Channel or have the Multi dock taken away. The Browser is a jewel. At the moment some are seeing some glitches. That is an unfortunate situation for those having trouble. We do know that those problems will be fixed and what we will be left with is a super powerful DAW that can be used for darn near any purpose relating to music creation. Fellow users we need to see how full our glass is and not dwell on past nostalgic remembrances that are colored by our false projections of what things were like. They were never this good or this powerful. Try to think about what we have and not what is in reality was a non existent past that was in fact very limited.
|
dcmg
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 393
- Joined: 2005/02/14 15:35:38
- Location: Phoenix, AZ.
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/06 10:43:59
(permalink)
I'm not unsympathetic to those not liking Lenses; I can appreciate what they will do for my workflow once dialed in, but I'm also working/experimenting with how my Project Templates/Screensets/Lenses work together ( and how sometimes they don't..and there are a few glitches). I guess I have faith that if enough of us USE them and discuss how they are interacting with other settings, the bakers will revise and refine. As for the "I miss the old SONAR" sentiment...I sort of understand that too, but at the same time work methods march on with time and music production techniques...and SONAR must march with them ( and typically we do as well). You could choose to not use Take Lanes and the MultiDock as well as Lenses. Ironically, it almost seems like Lenses is aiming at doing exactly that : allowing you to hide many of the features you don't want to use. Maybe you could create a global Lense that is used ALL THE TIME that has all the stuff you don't need hidden.
CWBL/SPlat/Studio One Pro on Win10-64 Bit Asrock H370 Pro4 w/Intel i7-8700 16GB Adata DDR4 2666 RAM All SSD's/ On-Board Intel Graphics Apollo 8 Quad FW/TB, AD2, Trillian, Omni, S-Gear, Waves, Soundtoys, TRacks, MicPres: Langevin DVC, Great River, UAD LA610Mk2. Dynaudio Monitors, and other stuff.
|
subtlearts
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2200
- Joined: 2006/01/10 05:59:21
- Location: Berlin
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/07 06:19:09
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby musicroom 2017/02/07 13:39:07
Andrzej Salm
scook Posting about screensets in a thread about lenses or the general 2016.11 thread may not be the most efficient way to ask Artist users a question.
Quite possibly, yes. I can't be bothered to start a new thread though....
Andrzej Salm Thank you very much, icontakt I really appreciate your help. I am going to stick to 2016.10 though. It all sounds like too much bother to be honest. Hopefully it will be resolved in December. If not, then I'm out...
I hate to say this, but what I'm getting from this is that you feel the need to vent about things changing from what you're familiar with, but are not actually interested in anyone's help trying to get your problems solved. You just want things to stay the way you're familar with them. Which is fine in and of itself; you should likely go with your gut and stick with the version you like and stop upgrading then. But posting rants about new functionality and then, when someone offers you constructive advice , answering that you "can't be bothered" to follow it, is a bit frustrating for people. Personally I have never used screensets or lenses all that much, I seem to get along pretty well just sticking with the default environment and minimizing / calling up views as I need to. Probably that slows me down a bit, but I do manage to get things done so I don't worry too much about UI changes - I just kind of adapt to them as they come up, and try to see the usefulness or logic behind the change so I can incorporate it if it makes sense to me. But I can sort of see where CW is heading with the new paradigm that underlies Lenses and I think it could end up being useful to me as I move forward with the program. I have to agree with John overall though - this pretending that 8.5 was somehow the pinnacle for Sonar and everything has been downhill since then, strikes me as a rather rose-coloured-glasses view of the glories of the past - I have been with Sonar since version 5 and for my money the current version, little hiccups here and there notwithstanding, is better than it's ever been in virtually every way, by a country mile. Pre-skylight interfaces were a hot mess of inscrutable little buttons by comparison. But, one man's fish is another man's poisson...
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/07 08:30:57
(permalink)
That was a great post Subtlearts. very well said. I haven't spoke much about Lenses yet because I am still learning to incorporate them in to my work flow. At first glance, im not a huge fan. I thought I would be, but there are just too many global changes im not happy with. But with all that said, before say "Im rolling back" I need to give it a fair chance and not afraid to say, I need to learn more about how I can use them. Sonar 8 was a great software no doubt but we have seen this time and time again, people just don't like change. even when its for the better. remember how many people complained about the "Save button" being removed from the control bar  . Well the gave us the "Custom module" which allows us to do this now and people have found other reasons to be unhappy. its all about change, not everyone likes change. Myself ? Im kind of a middle of the road type of guy. I am not a big fan of change but I realize this 1 very important detail... Without change, there is no ceiling. no way to grow, no way to get better. So I welcome change just like I did in the late 1990's when I realized my old tape machines might not be included in future plans. I didn't sell them, I just started to learn the digital audio dance. Sonar platinum and especially this new version 11.2016 is better than its ever been (well minus a few hiccups here and there..and a few things I would personally like to change)
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3249
- Joined: 2015/01/17 03:52:50
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/07 08:50:23
(permalink)
the thing to remember about commercial software is that is has to keep changing in order to keep getting paid for - and those changes aren't necessarily going to be in your favour... the sonar x-series seems like it was cakewalk's big refactoring (under-the-hood changes, new gui) to bring the codebase up to date, and now changes in the current sonar aimed at simplifying things for new users, the target market... it will (hopefully!) soon be as stable as 8.5, although monthly updates always means there's more chance of a bug but also more chance of that bug fixed by next release (depending on how "agile" the internal processes really are) venting is useful as it quite often reveals a solution previously unnoticed, as well as the psychic relief experienced by the venting user (the OV!) software is dynamic and so should its users be!
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/09 02:15:54
(permalink)
I don't (yet) see myself using lenses, but I said that about screensets is O nail I understood their use and made them work for me...
Screen sets are still working fine here, but as I'm not using lenses, maybe there is a problem within the lenses themselves? ...or maybe simply learning their setup/use more thoroughly?
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/09 14:24:14
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Sijel 2016/12/25 16:31:39
I had a situation with Microsoft Word that some people have with SONAR. I had been using Word 95 forever - written books with it, articles, etc. It did everything I needed. When I joined Gibson, I had to get on the same page as everyone else and started working with Office 365. Word was nothing like what I had been using. It was disorienting and slowed me down. However, I had to use it. Over time I realized it had a huge number of time- and labor-saving features Word 95 didn't have. I invested the time in learning them, and that investment has paid for itself many times over. I would never want to go back to Word 95...I could, but it would cut my productivity by probably 30%. Many times a change in SONAR isn't really that much of a change once you learn how it works. After spending a few minutes with the documentation, it didn't take me long to figure out I could use Take Lanes almost identically to how I had used Layers. It was mostly about choosing the appropriate Transport record mode and editing tools. I wrote a column about this for Sound on Sound magazine. I also think one's attitude about SONAR and change depends on how you use it. If you're a hobbyist, then you might not have much time to play with SONAR, so you just want to come home, relax, and make some music...not spend time learning about the new anti-gravity module. OTOH if you depend on SONAR (as I do), even though the changes put up a speed bump in the workflow, once learned they can make a huge, time-saving improvement. In this case it's about an investment. If I invest 1 hour in learning something, and it saves me 20 hours over the course of the year, then I'm really glad that feature exists. I'm still wrapping my head around Lenses, but I suspect that I'll find a use for them that's beneficial so I'm investing the time in learning about them.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/09 14:28:17
(permalink)
panup I wonder why CW does not call them workspaces. It would sound more intuitive, at least for Adobe users...
The reason why is the functionality is similar, but what other programs call "workspaces" (Adobe isn't the only one) tend to be subsets of what SONAR's Lenses do. Also I think Lenses may acquire additional functionality that would remove them even further from the "traditional" definition of workspaces. The name "Lenses" was chosen so a) people wouldn't assume automatically they're just like workspaces, and b) because they're intended to "focus" on particular aspects of SONAR.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/09 15:23:01
(permalink)
Needless to say I'm glad you have posted in this thread Craig. I just bought your book. I don't know when I will have time to read it though. I didn't know it was 311 pages long. I thought I understood lenses when I started this thread. I'm not so sure now. I still like them just that they are somewhat deeper then I thought. What I don't understand is the negativity some express about them. I don't find them intrusive. If one can't see a use forget forget about them. Be happy for those that can. I'm a Wordperfect user from the early DOS days. Never liked Word. I finally upgraded it to X8. I had been on X5 for a long time.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/09 17:56:55
(permalink)
John What I don't understand is the negativity some express about them.
It's easy to think that people are just resistant to change, but that doesn't explain why someone would resist change. Often, the unspoken conclusion is it's due to someone being a Luddite, but I think that misses the point in the vast majority of cases, and does a disservice to those who resist change. At my seminars I often talk about the conflict of the intuitive art of making music with processes that require conscious thought. The two are opposed to each other. The example I always give is you have some great groove going, then the phone rings or there's a mechanical problem. There goes the groove, because you had to switch from right-brain to left-brain thinking. Rarely can you get the groove back. So the initial response to an "upset the applecart" shift is "this will make the process of making music more difficult" because it will require left-brain thinking to learn it, which goes against the right brain, which just wants to make music. And those who resist change for this reason are right. But - they need to take this process one step further, not stop just shy of the finish line. A shift can cause a disruption but once you get past the disruption and integrate the shift into your workflow and it becomes second nature, the right kind of shift can actually make a more accommodating environment for right-brain thinking. Take track icons: an image appeals directly to your right brain, whereas a text label requires left-brain parsing. It's a tiny change, but all my songs use track icons now and it may sound weird, but my music is better because of it. Cakewalk has added a ton of features to SONAR (some big and some small) that once assimilated, streamline workflow so you can make better music.
|
VariousArtist
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1397
- Joined: 2003/11/07 15:03:09
- Location: London, UK & California, USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/12 20:34:31
(permalink)
Anderton
John What I don't understand is the negativity some express about them.
It's easy to think that people are just resistant to change, but that doesn't explain why someone would resist change. Often, the unspoken conclusion is it's due to someone being a Luddite, but I think that misses the point in the vast majority of cases, and does a disservice to those who resist change. At my seminars I often talk about the conflict of the intuitive art of making music with processes that require conscious thought. The two are opposed to each other. The example I always give is you have some great groove going, then the phone rings or there's a mechanical problem. There goes the groove, because you had to switch from right-brain to left-brain thinking. Rarely can you get the groove back. So the initial response to an "upset the applecart" shift is "this will make the process of making music more difficult" because it will require left-brain thinking to learn it, which goes against the right brain, which just wants to make music. And those who resist change for this reason are right. But - they need to take this process one step further, not stop just shy of the finish line. A shift can cause a disruption but once you get past the disruption and integrate the shift into your workflow and it becomes second nature, the right kind of shift can actually make a more accommodating environment for right-brain thinking. Take track icons: an image appeals directly to your right brain, whereas a text label requires left-brain parsing. It's a tiny change, but all my songs use track icons now and it may sound weird, but my music is better because of it. Cakewalk has added a ton of features to SONAR (some big and some small) that once assimilated, streamline workflow so you can make better music.
I think a good way to incorporate change, which follows from your left/right brain comment, is to set aside days for working at your DAW on non-musical activities. For example, every Thursday learn something new about your DAW (left brain), and avoid doing anything artistic (right brain). And vice versa, don't try to learn something new when you're working on a song or mix Separating the activities with dedicated time can help to avoid a lot of frustration.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/12 21:47:37
(permalink)
VariousArtist I think a good way to incorporate change, which follows from your left/right brain comment, is to set aside days for working at your DAW on non-musical activities.
For example, every Thursday learn something new about your DAW (left brain), and avoid doing anything artistic (right brain). And vice versa, don't try to learn something new when you're working on a song or mix
Separating the activities with dedicated time can help to avoid a lot of frustration.
I agree 100%. From time to time I "study" SONAR in the same way that I'd practice guitar. In particular, I'll take one topic, and delve into it in depth. Those with limited time on their hands might think "I don't have the time to do this." But again, it's an investment. If you spend 1 hour but gain even just 3 hours over the course of a year from what you've learned, you've had a 300% return on investment for that year alone - not bad!
|
dcmg
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 393
- Joined: 2005/02/14 15:35:38
- Location: Phoenix, AZ.
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/13 15:19:19
(permalink)
Adding to this: Any time there's major changes to a program/method/UI, I typically find it's good to identify the 5 or so tasks that I need to do *everyday*, and learn those 5 things first. This takes the stress of something new away, as you know you're (at least) EVEN in productivity as you were before the major changes took place. Then, take the next 5 new features and tackle 1 every day, as these other wise gentlemen have suggested. I'm also comfortable knowing that I don't know everything about SONAR, but I know the stuff that helps me serve clients within the context of our work. Craig's tips serve as introductions to functions I would rarely use, but will often check it out after he explains it...if only to say "woah cool..had no idea SONAR could do that". ( Of course, I then promptly forget how to do that task and never do it again, but that's another thread :) )
CWBL/SPlat/Studio One Pro on Win10-64 Bit Asrock H370 Pro4 w/Intel i7-8700 16GB Adata DDR4 2666 RAM All SSD's/ On-Board Intel Graphics Apollo 8 Quad FW/TB, AD2, Trillian, Omni, S-Gear, Waves, Soundtoys, TRacks, MicPres: Langevin DVC, Great River, UAD LA610Mk2. Dynaudio Monitors, and other stuff.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/13 17:00:57
(permalink)
dcmg Craig's tips serve as introductions to functions I would rarely use, but will often check it out after he explains it...if only to say "woah cool..had no idea SONAR could do that". ( Of course, I then promptly forget how to do that task and never do it again, but that's another thread :) )
That's why it seemed like a book was a good idea
|
dcmg
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 393
- Joined: 2005/02/14 15:35:38
- Location: Phoenix, AZ.
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2016/12/13 21:13:08
(permalink)
Anderton
dcmg Craig's tips serve as introductions to functions I would rarely use, but will often check it out after he explains it...if only to say "woah cool..had no idea SONAR could do that". ( Of course, I then promptly forget how to do that task and never do it again, but that's another thread :) )
That's why it seemed like a book was a good idea 
It was, and well executed. Thanks for all the work. There are some real productivity gains there for the asking price. Bargain.
CWBL/SPlat/Studio One Pro on Win10-64 Bit Asrock H370 Pro4 w/Intel i7-8700 16GB Adata DDR4 2666 RAM All SSD's/ On-Board Intel Graphics Apollo 8 Quad FW/TB, AD2, Trillian, Omni, S-Gear, Waves, Soundtoys, TRacks, MicPres: Langevin DVC, Great River, UAD LA610Mk2. Dynaudio Monitors, and other stuff.
|
Steve_Karl
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2534
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:53:26
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2017/02/07 01:06:35
(permalink)
blackavrora How about keyboard shortcuts? I Can't find how i can swith fast beetwin Lens's :(
I agree 100%. Lenses need hot keys. That would make them fast as lightning. It's really slow reaching up there with the mouse and pulling a drop down menu.
|
Steve_Karl
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2534
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:53:26
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2017/02/07 01:19:21
(permalink)
kzmaier
jshep0102 They can also be looked at as global screensets. I opened each of my screensets, then created a new lens and saved it with the same name. You can create more lenses than you can screensets. I expect it's been explained elsewhere, but why do screensets have to be per project only, and not global?
I agree, just make screensets global???
For me that would remove a ton of functionality as I have different screensets for every project. I think screensets need to stay on a per project level.
|
Steve_Karl
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2534
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:53:26
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2017/02/07 01:21:21
(permalink)
Morten Saether [Cakewalk]
blackavrora How about keyboard shortcuts? I Can't find how i can swith fast beetwin Lens's :(
This is planned for a future version. Stay tuned. The Lenses feature will continue to evolve. Cheers, Morten
Awesome x 100! Hotkeys for switching lenses will make them really useful for me.
|
Steve_Karl
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2534
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:53:26
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2017/02/07 01:23:59
(permalink)
jshep0102 On the first page I said that Lenses load much slower than screensets for me. Is anyone else experiencing this? I shutdown/restart daily, so I don't think it's cache related.
Same for me ... slightly slower than screenset changes.
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2017/02/07 02:14:20
(permalink)
I e only just now had a look.
Wow what project management especially if it's large. Add Lenses, Screensets and Mix recall together and you have enormous flexibility over how you view and interact with the data that comprises your project.
Imagine different Lenses that have various Mix Recall settings and different Screensets. This is going to be my personal project in getting back into Sonar.
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
WallyG
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 833
- Joined: 2013/05/03 11:37:52
- Location: Arizona
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2017/02/07 12:04:00
(permalink)
Steve_Karl For me that would remove a ton of functionality as I have different screensets for every project. I think screensets need to stay on a per project level. Steve, I can learn something here. Why do you have different screensets for every project? A couple examples would be helpful. I have the same screen sets for every project I work on and mostly switch between 2 of them. I think I might be missing something so I would appreciate your comments. Thanks, Walt
Roland Jupiter 80, Roland D50, Roland Integra 7, Roland BK-7m, Yamaha Montage 6, ARP Odyssey, Excelsior Continental Artist, Roland FR-8X, 1967 Fender Jaguar, Fender Strat, Fender 1965 Twin Reverb reissue, Selmer Trumpet, Akai EWI, Studio One 4 Professional, Melodyne Studio 4, Behringer X-Touch, RME Fireface UCX, MOTU MIDI Express XT - ADK Pro Audio Hex Xtreme 6 Core i7 4.5GHz, 64GB, 480GB SS, 3 X 3TB Hard Drives, Win 10, 2 X 27" & 1X 46" Monitors, My WEB site - www.gontowski.com/music
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Lenses what do you think about them?
2017/02/07 13:31:28
(permalink)
As I said I don't understand the negative comments on this. In the case of Lenses use them or don't. No one is compelled to use them nor is there any need to "rollback". The same applies to Screensets. These are tools within Sonar that you can use or not. There is simply no reason to knock them.
|