tenfoot
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2186
- Joined: 2015/01/22 18:12:07
- Location: Qld, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 11:35:27
(permalink)
I too shall bow out respectfully. I completely understand your query John T, but it seems at this point no one has pondered the question let alone has an answer. It is indeed a work in progress. Given the bakers track record I am sure it will work out eventually. Hopefully you can find a way to take advantage of Cakewalks generous offer! Like everyone I am very grateful for the lifetime deal, and certainly agree that the future with Cakewalk is bright. A good night to all:)
Bruce. Sonar Platinum 2017-09, Studio One 3.5.3, Win 10 x64, Quad core i7, RME Fireface, Behringer X32 Producer, Behringer X32 Rack, Presonus Faderport, Lemure Software Controller (Android), Enttec DMXIS VST lighting controller, Xtempo POK.
|
thedukewestern
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 387
- Joined: 2008/04/14 12:06:59
- Location: NY
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 11:36:08
(permalink)
It seems pretty simple to me - I mean - for a year plus, platinum has been 150 a year (I've used sonar since producer 7) - for the core - just like any other program thats evolving from version to version. Lets say in 10 years no one uses daws anymore - and cakewalk develops another tool to suit the needs of the market... and splat is no longer relevant....no one can predict that. Meanwhile we've all used splat for 10 years. So instead of paying the yearly rate we've taken advantage of this program for the 10 years. After two years of being in the program you've already reached a positive balance (financially) as opposed to the subscription model. I look at it as an incentive for cakewalk to devote some of their energy INTO creating great add ons. In my article - for example - I mentioned that I use the rapture pro a lot - that's an add on cakewalk product. Here's what I know - Cakewalk has built itself on being a "Brave" company, and has built itself in a grass roots community manner. This is actually the MAIN reason myself - like many of its users, have zero hesitation in becoming grateful customers. With a program like this - there is a HUGE incentive - when choosing between DAW's, to buy in for life, and explore further and further into the world of sound design and music production. Many music producers become very capable in 1 daw and platform, and stick with it. For example - the guy who just did mission impossible 5 did the whole score in sonar 8. I think its a great example of a Win Win scenario!
Be the first one who thinks that you can Sonar Platinum, Windows 7 64 bit - clean install January 2016, Focusrite Pro 40, Outboard Pres, Native Instruments Komplete, Izotope, PSP, Melodyne, Vegetarian
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 11:38:32
(permalink)
I understand the curiosity factor here, but this subject is being beat like a dead horse. no disrespect to the OP or others interested in this topic, there's just like 5 threads going on...all basically the same subject.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
subtlearts
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2200
- Joined: 2006/01/10 05:59:21
- Location: Berlin
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 11:44:02
(permalink)
John T I'll give it one last go. What will Platinum offer that Professional doesn't, going forward, given that all Platinum-only features to date, are precisely the things that Cakewalk are describing as non-core? Talking about the value of the lifetime membership is not an answer to this question.
I don't think *anyone* can answer that question specifically at this point. What I have surmised from the state of things and from keeping up with a fair chunk of the whirlwind here over the past few days (often with a lot of head-shaking), with an emphasis on what I've read from the bakers themselves, and from Craig, is as follows. 1. They are still offering 3 tiers of the program for sale at the moment, but only Platinum has a lifetime option, and that's not even an option right now - if you renew or upgrade to Platinum right now, until the end of August, it's the lifetime deal. But the other tiers are still available, which means that there is a clear implication that there will continue to be a difference between these 3 tiers. If they change that on Sept 1, that will be a pretty major bait-and-switch, and many people will be justifiably very angry about it. They have said clearly that this is not the intention. But that's different from a concrete list of features that will differentiate the tiers. 2. Going forward, after the lifetime offers expire (if in fact they do) on Sept 1, there will be no difference between the updates for monthly or yearly Platinum members and lifetime members. That much at least is a clear commitment from them, and again, to go back on that would invite major backlash. 3. As you've noted, at the moment, everything on the Coming Soon list applies to all three tiers. This does seem to be a problem, as it confuses the value proposition, and this seems to be precisely what you are concerned about, which I understand. If you look at that list, it kind of screams out, why do I need the top tier again, especially if I already 'own' all the legacy bundlewear that makes it worthwhile? The fly-out EQ is great and all, but... 4. There have been relatively vague statements from CW that there will absolutely continue to be differentiating features between the three tiers in the future, *in addition* to extra-cost things along the lines of the products that currently are available for add-on purchase and not bundled into Platinum... but again, none of them are on the pending list and nothing specific has been said about what they might be. Craig has pointed out that they are unlikely to give away their whole strategy including every feature and product on the development playlist, which makes sense, but isn't much help if you're trying to make a decision about it. Moreover, it seems (and Craig has posted about this too) that there is some Blue Sky level thinking and planning going on over there just now, so it may well be that the reason they're not posting anything more specific is because they simply don't know yet. Hopefully the need to rein in some of the confusion here will convince them of the need to give something more specific soon. 5. So buying into Lifetime right now (which I have already done) is simply an act of faith that CW will figure all this out and continue to deliver value to each tier of their customer base, including Lifers. To me, the value they've provided over the past year and a half since the big change to rolling updates, justifies this faith - but others' mileage may value. Of course none of this helps you, if money is tight and you're on the fence and looking for a concrete reason to make a tough decision. I wish I could help with that, but at the end of the day, you pays your money and you takes your chances...
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 11:46:37
(permalink)
It's not a tough decision, or a decision at all. I simply don't have the money. I realise that's nobody's problem but mine, but as a customer, I'd like a more considered reply from Cakewalk than "spend the money you've not got and stop worrying about it".
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
- Total Posts : 6475
- Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 14:21:28
(permalink)
John T As is to be generally expected when making such a move, the first thing that happened is my income dropped considerably, and has slowly started to crawl back up over a couple of years of building up the business. So yes, while the lifetime thing would make a lot of sense if I had £150 lying around, I just don't. Am still very much in a bootstrapping just-about-scraping-by phase. Which is nobody else's concern, of course. Surely you can see, where the confusion arises. It's been said several times by Cakewalk that Platinum going forward will be more core stuff and add ons will be generally outside of that. Now, going through the rolling updates page, there are about five things that were Platinum only. Drum Replacer, Vocal Synch, Lounge Lizard, Strum, and a couple of other odds and ends. These are exactly the kind of things that seem to be deemed non-core. Which is fine, except, as I keep saying, it looks like the Platinum monthly deal offers nothing that the Professional doesn't, going by what Cakewalk reps have said. I'm not accusing anyone of a rip off or anything, I just think this hasn't been thought through. In my position, why would I not just switch to Professional for the cheaper price?
Thanks I understand. Just keep in mind that if you switch to professional today on a monthly plan without completing 12 months you will lose drum replace and any platinum exclusives. To clarify this HAS been through through. You can't expect us to know exact details of what is happening one year from now. Not even we know exactly what features will be shipped beyond a one year time frame. At this time we have no plans of discontinuing professional or artist. So we will continue to distinguish them going forward as new features are developed. I can't give you details on that since they dont exist :)
|
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
- Total Posts : 6475
- Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 14:31:01
(permalink)
John T I don't see how that has anything to do with it. I dunno, perhaps I should give up. It seems like a simple question to me, but I'm clearly failing to communicate it somehow. I'll give it one last go. What will Platinum offer that Professional doesn't, going forward, given that all Platinum-only features to date, are precisely the things that Cakewalk are describing as non-core? Talking about the value of the lifetime membership is not an answer to this question.
The question is independent of lifetime updates. Do you need the CURRENT features in Platinum? If not don't buy that version. If you buy platinum lifetime today you will get all CURRENT features in platinum plus any future platinum specific features. If you buy professional you will NOT get the current platinum features and you will also NOT get updates for life for professional.
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/04 14:50:12
(permalink)
|
hevanw
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 80
- Joined: 2014/12/20 08:00:47
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 06:02:03
(permalink)
John T I'll give it one last go. What will Platinum offer that Professional doesn't, going forward, given that all Platinum-only features to date, are precisely the things that Cakewalk are describing as non-core?
I think this sort of issue is why I suspect that the Lifetime deal is a first step toward a more unified model in which there won't be Artist vs Pro vs Plat any longer. This issue is also not new at all. Even before the monthly subscription, when a new release arrived, you could wonder whether you really needed the (more expensive) upgrade to the new version. Studio to Studio was cheaper than Producer to Producer, so you did not just have to look at what Producer had more than Studio, but actually what the NEW Producer had more than the old one. With a monthly subscription scheme, I can imagine that CW is now struggling with asking more every month for Platinum vs Pro while some months both subscribers get exactly the same thing. This issue is also why at some points I was considering downgrading. E.g. I was on X1 Producer and had several VSTs with that. As I didn't really need some of the new extras in Platinum (Melodyne, etc...) I could perfectly downgrade to Pro or even Artist and still keep on using all those VSTs that I had from Producer and which today come with Platinum. Also, a downgrade would not take away my opportunity to do a Producer->Platinum upgrade later on (I double-checked this with CW). In the end, I did buy a 1y Platinum due to a serious discount on Black Friday, but the point is that the fact that a 1y membership gives you perpetual usage right also means that CW really has to offer new things within every 12 month window to make sure that those on Platinum do get more than those on Pro or Artist. However, as opposed to the past where you knew what is in a new release, today it's a complete guess whether those extras are worth it for you or not. EDIT: here's another example why the current membership model with 3 tiers is creating all sorts of issues : http://forum.cakewalk.com/219-m3430478.aspx
post edited by Rocsee70 - 2016/06/07 07:09:42
|
ramscapri
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 316
- Joined: 2008/03/23 06:02:59
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 07:35:50
(permalink)
Rocsee70 EDIT: here's another example why the current membership model with 3 tiers is creating all sorts of issues : http://forum.cakewalk.com/219-m3430478.aspx
In the OP of the linked thread above, the link for the $49.99 opens to sort of a blank page for me. Seems that it should be a cakewalk store page but appears blank to me. Are you folks seeing any content there ? Also, the second link for the $168.99 which goes to the audiodeluxe page shows up as $199 for me. Whats the catch here ? Honestly, I really did not understand what the deal is here.
************************************************************Sonar Platinum ∞, HP Envy Core i7-4700 Quadcore touchscreen laptop, 16 GB RAM, Windows 10 64-bit, Roland Octacapture, Zoom H6, Akai MPK Mini mk2, Novation Launchpad Mini mk2, NI Komplete 11, KRK KNS-8400, AKG P120
|
mdages
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 139
- Joined: 2014/08/26 11:14:22
- Location: Germany, Karlsruhe
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 08:04:19
(permalink)
Oh man, as more I read on this new lifetime model, as more I get confused. Btw, english isn't my native language and translating all your stuff makes it more harder to understand. Ok, here's my current summary of what I've understand. Currently I'm on Platinum membership with anual payment and I'm lucky with that. What I get are core feature updates and fixes. Some addons like Drum-Replacer or Vocalsync are included in this kind of membership. Any extras like Concrete Limiter or Rapture Pro for example are not included, I've bought them seperatly. With the new lifetime membership I will get core updates and fixed. I'll not get any things declared as addons, I've to buy them seperately. Correct? When I switch over to Lifetime model, can I go back at any time to the normal Platinum membership? -Markus
music is just a sequence of sounds... Sonar Platinum -> R.I.P (Shame on Gibson) Cubase Pro 9.5 Windows 10 x64 German Core i7, 12GB RAM - 5 TB HDD/SSD Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 Studiologic Acuna 88 VSL VE-Pro with windows slave computers
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 08:14:08
(permalink)
When I switch over to Lifetime model, can I go back at any time to the normal Platinum membership? What, simply start paying more money for the hell of it? Why on earth would you even consider it? I might be missing the point (as usual) but once you've paid for lifetime I can think of no reasonable scenario why you would want to revert to annual. If you just want to give money away, I'll give you my Paypal details
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
hevanw
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 80
- Joined: 2014/12/20 08:00:47
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 08:51:20
(permalink)
mdages Currently I'm on Platinum membership with anual payment and I'm lucky with that. What I get are core feature updates and fixes. Some addons like Drum-Replacer or Vocalsync are included in this kind of membership. Any extras like Concrete Limiter or Rapture Pro for example are not included, I've bought them seperatly. With the new lifetime membership I will get core updates and fixed. I'll not get any things declared as addons, I've to buy them seperately.
What you get with Lifetime is *exactly the same* as what you would get if you would renew year after year after year, etc... mdages When I switch over to Lifetime model, can I go back at any time to the normal Platinum membership?
Since you get exactly the same in Lifetime as in Yearly, there is absolutely no point in going back to 'normal Platinum', unless you feel like throwing away money (or sponsoring Cakewalk).
|
subtlearts
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2200
- Joined: 2006/01/10 05:59:21
- Location: Berlin
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 08:51:37
(permalink)
mdages Oh man, as more I read on this new lifetime model, as more I get confused. Btw, english isn't my native language and translating all your stuff makes it more harder to understand.  ....
CW have been clear about this for a while now. There will be no difference between lifetime platinum upates and non-lifetime platinum updates. They will be the same. The only difference between lifetime and non-lifetime, is exactly that. One is time-unlimited. End of story. The amount of confusion here (not just you, and not just non-native English speakers either, so don't feel bad, lots of people have been confused) around the term 'core updates' has been mindblowing. CW just needed to be clear that they will still, as they always have done, make and sell products that are not included in Platinum. Current examples are Rapture Pro, Concrete Limiter, and so on. But the actual updates will be the same for all Platinum members. So there would be no reason to start paying for Platinum again because there is no difference between lifetime and non-lifetime except that one you pay for once and never again, and the other you keep paying for.
|
exitthelemming
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 29
- Joined: 2003/11/08 07:56:45
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 12:09:55
(permalink)
It certainly has been a fractious environment since the lifetime upgrade offer was announced. I've read through most of the related threads on these forums just now and can see both sides of the fence: 1 - the long standing Sonarians who have chosen to purchase Platinum life time upgrades are concerned that they might miss out on some additional content offered to upgraders/new customers who make their purchase after 31/8/16. Based on the responses we have had from CW to date, such fears appear to be groundless i.e. all Platinum users will get the same rolling updates as and when they become available. Yes, this means that annual/monthly Platinum members will be paying more than those on lifetime upgrades, but a sale offer is by definition time limited. My understanding of the pricing model is that those who upgrade to Platinum will receive the same additional content as those who purchase Platinum outright as a new customer i.e. Drum Replacer, Vocal Sync, Dimension Pro and Rapture (full versions), Analog Track Box, Breverb, PX64, TS64, VX64, Tone2 Bitfilter2, Lounge Lizard, Strum Session 2, True Pianos Amber and Ultra Analog Session2. 2 - CW cannot possibly confirm what additional content may be available for any tier of Sonar users in the future (as this content will only be in the development stage but it seems more than likely that additional instruments, FX, console strips etc will not automatically be included in the rolling updates i.e. they will be offered as separate purchases with a possible discount for existing customers) There is more than sufficient confirmed content info available in the store now with which to make a purchasing/upgrade decision.
|
fitzj
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1487
- Joined: 2005/10/13 11:56:37
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 18:31:08
(permalink)
I probably wont be around by 2037 so I guess I will have to make a will and will my beloved Sonar Platinum. LOL
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 18:40:00
(permalink)
<edit> I now understand how I have misunderstood the earliest post by Noel and so I have removed my incorrect caveat.
post edited by bapu - 2016/06/09 01:32:56
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 18:40:50
(permalink)
fitzj I probably wont be around by 2037 so I guess I will have to make a will and will my beloved Sonar Platinum. LOL
SONAR licenses are non-transferable. But I know you know that.
|
subtlearts
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2200
- Joined: 2006/01/10 05:59:21
- Location: Berlin
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 18:47:09
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby SteveStrummerUK 2016/06/07 19:49:17
bapu Caveat: Annual Platinum users will likely get 3rd Party add-on product s that life timers will not. Not always 100% exact but close enough that (almost) anyone should be able to understand that.
What are you basing this on? To me it directly contradicts what Andrew and others from CW have expressly stated, which is that updates for lifetime members and annual/monthly Platinum members will be identical. Of course I don't have a crystal ball to say what will happen and what won't, but to me if that were the case I would feel we had been lied to. I probably wouldn't cry in my beer about it, but it would explicitly contradict the terms under which I accepted the offer.
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 19:34:22
(permalink)
Post deleted due to misunderstanding.
post edited by SteveStrummerUK - 2016/06/09 03:51:55
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 19:37:19
(permalink)
Removed my dead wrong assumptions. I apologize to this forum.
post edited by bapu - 2016/06/09 01:33:59
|
jb101
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 20:59:06
(permalink)
bapu
subtlearts
bapu Caveat: Annual Platinum users will likely get 3rd Party add-on product s that life timers will not. Not always 100% exact but close enough that (almost) anyone should be able to understand that.
What are you basing this on? To me it directly contradicts what Andrew and others from CW have expressly stated, which is that updates for lifetime members and annual/monthly Platinum members will be identical. Of course I don't have a crystal ball to say what will happen and what won't, but to me if that were the case I would feel we had been lied to. I probably wouldn't cry in my beer about it, but it would explicitly contradict the terms under which I accepted the offer.
I'm basing it on statements by Andrew and Noel (which I may have misunderstood) that some 3rd party ad-ons may not be given to life timers but *may* be included in the annual members. They used the term "costly". I believe I have read every post in all of the bulky threads about this and I recall this being addressed in that way by CW staffers. And, I have been wrong before.
And I think you are AGAIN. How many ways can Cake staff comment that there is NO difference between what lifetime updates and annual updates members receive? Unless, as a forum host, you are privy to something that we are not, they have made this very clear. Repeatedly. You keep spreading this dis-information, on several threads. I am sure that this is not helping Cakewalk's case.. Unless, as I say, you are in on some secret ploy by Cakewalk that is contradicting what Cake staff are saying. I am surprised that a "forum host" would behave this way. Either you are accusing Cake staff of lying, letting some secret, dastardly plan out of the bag, or are clueless. None of these are particularly becoming of a "host". Cake have stated time and time again, there will be NO difference between what lifetime members receive, and what yearly/month time members receive. Whichever, WELL DONE.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 21:12:26
(permalink)
I do not see a host quoted in your post. Which one of us is causing your angst?
|
jb101
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 21:15:33
(permalink)
scook I do no see a host quoted in your post.
My bad, as the youth have it. I was under the impression that Ed was a host. Thank you for correcting the important part of my post.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 21:25:41
(permalink)
All Forum hosts are have "Forum Host" above their post count. Know who you are bashing and consider tempering your posts.
|
tenfoot
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2186
- Joined: 2015/01/22 18:12:07
- Location: Qld, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 21:34:17
(permalink)
Andrew Rossa [Cakewalk] All Platinum owners get the same updates and features. If you are an active member, the updates will be the same as the lifetime. Only difference is lifetime means you get all future updates to SONAR. Artist and Professional are still under membership and lifetime updates are exclusive to Platinum.
post edited by tenfoot - 2016/06/09 03:02:55
Bruce. Sonar Platinum 2017-09, Studio One 3.5.3, Win 10 x64, Quad core i7, RME Fireface, Behringer X32 Producer, Behringer X32 Rack, Presonus Faderport, Lemure Software Controller (Android), Enttec DMXIS VST lighting controller, Xtempo POK.
|
PiBoy
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 68
- Joined: 2013/12/29 02:09:49
- Location: Monterrey, Mexico
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 22:11:14
(permalink)
Is the Mac version included?
Shine On! PiBoy --------------- https://soundcloud.com/piboy-1 ------------------ Running: Sonar Platinum, Lenovo i7 6700HQ 2.6Ghz . 8GB RAM, Windows 10, Stainberg UR44.
|
tenfoot
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2186
- Joined: 2015/01/22 18:12:07
- Location: Qld, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 22:21:20
(permalink)
PiBoy Is the Mac version included?
Yes - the one membership covers both platforms.
Bruce. Sonar Platinum 2017-09, Studio One 3.5.3, Win 10 x64, Quad core i7, RME Fireface, Behringer X32 Producer, Behringer X32 Rack, Presonus Faderport, Lemure Software Controller (Android), Enttec DMXIS VST lighting controller, Xtempo POK.
|
stratman70
Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3044
- Joined: 2006/09/12 20:34:12
- Location: Earth
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 22:24:14
(permalink)
Well, sorry but as CW user since CWPA6 I understand why some are confused and I don't understand why it bothers anyone that someone is confused? Gosh sorry. Rapture Pro is a poor example for the the discussion. I think everyone knows that you have to pay for something like that. But Addictive Drums would be a good example. at first i understood it to mean things like AD which "were" included with the yearly subscription would NOT be included with the Lifetime sub. I mean Core is pretty specific. I won't bother to ask any questions for fear of rocks being thrown
|
jeff oliver
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 122
- Joined: 2015/01/20 03:37:40
- Status: offline
Re: Lifetime updates vs Yearly Membership payment.
2016/06/07 23:08:22
(permalink)
I've tried to read as much as I could about this as to understand exactly where CW is heading. I've been a platinum user from early on and have paid upfront for two years. I believe I understand where this is going but I'm an easy going person so I won't say something that would be speculation. I only have one question. Will I receive the same level of content that a "already" paid for this year until it runs out in February? That is the question for me. A company can change directions as they see fit for whatever reason. I just need to know that the trust that I gave CW in paying upfront earlier this year has not been forgotten. So, in the past I understood the difference in some items being paid add-ons and others coming without cost. IF this is no different then of course the lifetime deal is great for those with the extra money. Some very smart people here but I'm just a common sense type. Many people have said they would be more than happy to pay yearly for what we have been receiving, me included. But if the lifetime membership is only fixes and enhancements it would be more understandable to most users. It comes off as if CW is using their words carefully. Why would a company NOT take my money if I'm happy with what I receive in return? Just a layman type question. I know CW said it wanted to "reward" its faithful members. I hope that's the case. If its just a business move then I can deal with that too, that's what companies do. I just want CW to honor the deal already agreed to before moving on to yet another great deal. Thanks to you all for the help and insight over the years.
HP pavilion i7 6gig ram Windows 8.1 x64 HP 5500 onboard graphics Focusrite 18i20 Sonar Platinum x64
|