This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 4 of 9
Author
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9871
  • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
  • Location: Ohio
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 16:35:03 (permalink)
Sonar is NOT Cubase's biggest competitor...NOT EVEN CLOSE...CUBASE - WORLD WIDE is the LARGEST INSTALLED DAW in the WORLD....

 
Can you reveal the source of these statistics?  
 

Best Regards,

Jim Roseberry
jim@studiocat.com
www.studiocat.com
#91
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 16:44:05 (permalink)
stevec


In all fairness, cclarry did say that he doesn't personally need VST3, but does see the need for it when looking at the big picture.   And in that context I think it makes sense.   However, VST3 is just one aspect of the big picture.
 

Those features may be VERY important to some...great...no problem.

 
Maybe it's just me, but I really do see the use of those features I listed as being way more widespread than VST3 plugins.  IOW, I look at VST3 as the "some" and those other features as the "many".   That was really my only point - that CW's decision to spend their time and effort on features like those instead of VST3 was a good one.     Agree to disagree and all that.   

That is my point entirely...

We tend to diminish the wants and needs of others, in favor of our own PERSONAL wants and needs...
and I don't do that...I try to look at the big picture...see ahead...and around...and behind...360 so to speak.

It's good that Cake uses this forum as a sounding board. But, they need to use other sources as well, as NOT ALL
of their users are on this forum...so they need to keep their eye on what's happening, and has been happening, in the industry as a whole.

Try sending out a survey to ALL your registered users and see what results you get...I guarantee there will
be a HUGE difference in what ends up where on that list.

I'd love to see Sonar overtake Pro Junk and Cubase in all these Studios...and be number one on ALL the surveys..
but in order to do that you've got to not only meet, but exceed the standards, and be the first on the block to do it,
AND then add even more to SET standards ( Pro Channel ) .  Go above and beyond. Not just comply.  It sounds like they did the bare minimum on the list just to get the release out, rather then go above and beyond to get the most and the best out.

Personally, I don't need R-Mix, Breverb, or TH2.  It's great they are there...but, honestly, we all have plenty already
in those departments.  VST 3 would have been a better option over more plugins. (VST3 and Plugins - even better!!!)
and then sold us those PC Mods down the road...I would have bought in...and most of you would have too.

I'm fully stoked about X2....can't wait...

BTW...I have used ALL these programs....I used Cubase and Pro Tools for many years...Sonar, to me, is far above them, but it's not me that they have to convince...It's the rest of the Industry.


#92
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 16:54:09 (permalink)
Jim Roseberry



Sonar is NOT Cubase's biggest competitor...NOT EVEN CLOSE...CUBASE - WORLD WIDE is the LARGEST INSTALLED DAW in the WORLD....

 
Can you reveal the source of these statistics?  
 

All you have to do is read any Industry publication.  It's a well published fact.

Sonar themselves will tell you so.  They know where they stand.

( The source, btw...was Computer Music )

In the aritcle it stated that "While Pro Tools considers itself to be the Industry Standard, statistically Cubase is installed
in more Professional Studio's Worldwide then Pro Tools"

Cheers!


#93
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 16:59:57 (permalink)
john6448

VST3 is important to me, particularly because I work with orchestral music and Cubase has used it to make articulation switching so easy. 
Sigh. This is exactly the point I have been trying to make all along.  VST3 in itself doesn't give you "articulation switching" and even if we implemented the spec you wouldn't get that. That is a whole different feature which just happens to have some support in the VST3 spec. If that feature in itself is specially important to you by all means feature request it but asking for VST3 for sure isn't going to get that to you. Its like going to another vendor and asking why don't you support prochannel modules - its implemented in VST 2.4 after all :) 

I'll say it again. VST3 is a plugin spec - no more and no less. It is simply a template for implementing a common protocol to communicate with plugins.  It won't get you any new features! 




>>cclarry
>>But that does not dimish the importance of VST 3 implemenation. 
>>Plug Manufacturers and PC DAW's have been using and implementing it for 4 years now...while Cake sits on their lists. 
>>I don't use it...I don't need it...BUT...I understand the NEED and reason for the NEED, and that is why I support 
it. 

Lets see - you have no need for VST3 yourself and yet you want us to invest our resources in it just in case someone wants it. I'm afraid I don't see a lot of sense in that argument. We use our development time wisely to deliver tools that benefit the most of our customers base and not for some hypothetical gain. I think most people will agree that this is a better model. 
post edited by Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk] - 2012/09/06 17:08:08

Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
#94
Eddie TX
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1104
  • Joined: 2012/08/15 11:47:42
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:17:37 (permalink)
john6448


For my particular uses, Sonar has made a marketing choice not to pursue VST3 or an improved Staff View, and it's choice has left me feeling that I may have hitched my wagon to the wrong DAW. It is what it is, and no amount of bickering is going to change it.
Have you sent a request to CW to implement these features?  The CTO has stated right here that customer requests are a primary driver of what they put in new releases.  It's apparent that most of us value the kinds of features coming now in X2 over things like VST3.  If you and others in your position would send enough requests to CW for any particular feature, your wishes might just be granted one of these days.  CW is just trying to keep the greatest number of customers happy within the constraints of limited resources, just as any decent company would do. 
 
No DAW (or product of any kind) can be perfect for everyone, so there will always be those who wish Sonar was just a little different.  It's not worth throwing tantrums over, it's just the way the world is.  You take what you can get and make it work.  But hey, if someone had shown you ten years ago what was possible with ITB music production today, wouldn't your mind have been blown?  We do live in amazing times, eh?

Cheers,
Eddie

Sonar X3 Producer / Win 10 
The future exists in all directions.
#95
pdlstl
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 991
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:07:23
  • Location: Mineral Wells, TX
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:22:59 (permalink)
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk
Lets see - you have no need for VST3 yourself and yet you want us to invest our resources in it just in case someone wants it. I'm afraid I don't see a lot of sense in that argument. We use our development time wisely to deliver tools that benefit the most of our customers base and not for some hypothetical gain. I think most people will agree that this is a better model. 
A big ol' gulp of fresh reality is always so refreshing. Thanks Noel!

#96
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:29:04 (permalink)
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk
]

john6448

VST3 is important to me, particularly because I work with orchestral music and Cubase has used it to make articulation switching so easy. 
Sigh. This is exactly the point I have been trying to make all along.  VST3 in itself doesn't give you "articulation switching" and even if we implemented the spec you wouldn't get that. That is a whole different feature which just happens to have some support in the VST3 spec. If that feature in itself is specially important to you by all means feature request it but asking for VST3 for sure isn't going to get that to you. Its like going to another vendor and asking why don't you support prochannel modules - its implemented in VST 2.4 after all :) 

I'll say it again. VST3 is a plugin spec - no more and no less. It is simply a template for implementing a common protocol to communicate with plugins.  It won't get you any new features! 




>>cclarry
>>But that does not dimish the importance of VST 3 implemenation. 
>>Plug Manufacturers and PC DAW's have been using and implementing it for 4 years now...while Cake sits on their lists. 
>>I don't use it...I don't need it...BUT...I understand the NEED and reason for the NEED, and that is why I support 
it. 

Lets see - you have no need for VST3 yourself and yet you want us to invest our resources in it just in case someone wants it. I'm afraid I don't see a lot of sense in that argument. We use our development time wisely to deliver tools that benefit the most of our customers base and not for some hypothetical gain. I think most people will agree that this is a better model. 

Noel,
 
This is a very unreasonable reply  - from the CTO especially.
Waves plugins rely on the VST 3 standard for some of their better functionality.
FabFilter Plugins rely on VST 3 standard as well, and most other Plugin manufacturers
and DAW's are supporting this format.

I could go on...listing what has been posted here in this thread....that some of the synths require VST 3
that other things require VST 3...and while it is just a standard, as you stated, it is an INDUSTRY STANDARD
that has been around for over 4 years now!
 
Your attempts to diminish the importance of this are ludicrous, to say the least.  Do you really believe
that your customers are that naive?

I could care less one way or the other..other then the fact that I see about 50 percent here, on this forum alone, who
not only WANT it ..but NEED IT for their software to work most effeciently.  And a LOT who stated emphatically that
they would not upgrade to X2 until VST 3 is implemented because the work they do requires it, so they are using "other
DAW's, that DO support it".

No you should not invest your money to satisfy me..you should invest it to satisfy the MANY customers you now have
who not only WANT it...but NEED it to do their jobs.  And there are far more then just the ones on this forum, as those who
use this program for a lving do not have the time to sit here on this forum and discuss it.

Really....really...really...who's being fooled here?



#97
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:33:57 (permalink)
Personally, I don't need R-Mix, Breverb, or TH2. It's great they are there...but, honestly, we all have plenty already in those departments. VST 3 would have been a better option over more plugins.

 
Just one last point...   Adding plugins to a release is likely to be the least amount of time and effort spent, by far.   So comparing the inclusion of a new VST spec (which potentially affects everything) to adding plugins doesn't really seem like a fair comparison.   That's why I listed the features I did earlier, because those are likely to be more inline with the time needed to incorporate VST3.    Or to put it another way, if VST3 were that simple to do, we wouldn't be having this discussion.  
 
All that said, I do hope CW will implement VST3 in the near future -  much of their history has been about using cutting edge technology.   But I am happy that X2 was more about core workflow enhancements instead, this time around.  
 
Now, how about VST3 vs. Staff View...  
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
#98
firefly9000
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 87
  • Joined: 2012/05/23 21:48:03
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:34:28 (permalink)
NEW VST 3 Features - from steinberg site.

Improved performance

Managing large plug-in sets and multiple virtual instruments on typical studio computer systems can often be difficult because of CPU performance limits. VST3 helps to improve overall performance by applying processing to plug-ins only when audio signals are present on their respective inputs. Instead of always processing input signals, VST3 plug-ins can apply their processing economically and only when it is needed. Multiple dynamic I/Os

VST3 plug-ins are no longer limited to a fixed number of inputs and outputs. Their I/O configuration can dynamically adapt to the channel configuration they’re inserted in, meaning that any VST3 plug-in can be surround-capable with true multi-channel processing. For example, all the new VST3 plug-ins in Nuendo 4 can work in stereo-mode when inserted into a stereo channel, but switch to 6 channels when inserted into a 5.1 channel. Each audio channel is processed independently. Interaction between channels depends on the type and design of the plug-in. In addition to their flexible audio bussing capabilities, VST3 plug-ins may also offer a dedicated event bus. Typically, this is a MIDI input for control/modulation but these busses are no longer restricted to MIDI standard only. Future plug-ins may replace the common MIDI interface with alternative methods of control. Activating/deactivating busses

A typical issue with current virtual instruments is their audio output bussing system and how they’re connected to the mixer after loading. Especially virtual samplers with multiple outputs often occupy more mixer channels than need. The VST3 interface offers the possibility to deactivate unused busses after loading and even reactivate those when needed. This cleans up the mixer and further helps to reduce CPU load. Resizable edit windows

VST3 introduces a new approach to plug-in GUIs though window resizing, allowing for extremely flexible use of valuable screen space. Sample-accurate automation

VST3 also features vastly improved parameter automation with sample accuracy and support for ‘ramped’ automation data, allowing completely accurate and rapid parameter automation changes. Logical parameter organization

The plug-in parameters are displayed in a tree structure. Parameters are grouped into sections which represent the structure of the plug-in. Parameters like “Cutoff” and “Resonance” could be grouped into a section called “Filter”. This makes searching for a certain parameters easier, such as on an automation track. This also allows assigning a group of parameters to a specific MIDI Channel input and audio output bus. Optional VST3/SKI combination

As a direct result of the modular interface design of VST3, the Steinberg Kernel Interface (SKI) can be combined with VST3 plug-ins. SKI is an additional SDK that allows extremely close integration of a plug-in with a Steinberg host application, and allows functions to be carried out almost from within the application. This extends to the ability to create tracks, copy, cut, paste or process events in the Steinberg host application. SKI is provided to selected industry partners upon request. VSTXML for remote controllers

Remote controllers for audio and MIDI software applications have become increasingly popular. With VSTXML, VST3 offers far more flexible control of VST plug-ins by remote controllers. Using the knobs and faders on the control surface, parameters can be recorded, renamed and edited in many ways. Parameters that cannot be edited can be routed for display purposes to the control surface, for example to show Gain Reduction on compressor. UTF16 for localized parameter naming

In VST3, all strings that can be displayed to the user are in Unicode (UTF16) format. Usage of this universal character base allows the host application to display characters in localized languages. No MIDI restriction for parameter value transfers

VST3 has a dedicated interface for event handling that carries a much wider range of functionality than standard MIDI events would be able to provide. This opens up a big range of opportunities for musical use cases with very high potential for innovative product design. For example with VST3 some controller events (for example, pitch) can be referred to a note event (using a note unique ID). This offers the possibility to e.g. modulate only a single note which itself is part of a chord. Audio inputs for VST instruments

The VST3 interface expands VST instruments by adding the ability to create audio input busses. As a result, audio data can be routed to an VST3 instrument. A synthesizer which has a built-in e.g. vocoder effect is able to process audio data coming in from other sources as well. Multiple MIDI inputs/outputs

Unlike with VST 2.x,, a VST3 plug-in can have more than only one MIDI input or one MIDI output at the same time. 64-bit processing

VST3 plug-ins are generally able to process audio data in 64-bit.
#99
dantarbill
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1820
  • Joined: 2004/12/15 10:48:18
  • Location: Monrovia, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:34:31 (permalink)
I've had WaveLab 7 since it was first released.  It supports VST3 and includes a number of VST3 plugs.  I use WaveLab more regularly than I use SONAR (I'm afraid).  I have yet to have even opened a VST3 plug...or had a need to.
 
I think there's a much more compelling case for implementing ARA support than VST3 at this point...especially if your development resources are constrained.

Dan Tarbill
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:35:27 (permalink)
Eddie TX


john6448


For my particular uses, Sonar has made a marketing choice not to pursue VST3 or an improved Staff View, and it's choice has left me feeling that I may have hitched my wagon to the wrong DAW. It is what it is, and no amount of bickering is going to change it.
Have you sent a request to CW to implement these features?  The CTO has stated right here that customer requests are a primary driver of what they put in new releases.  It's apparent that most of us value the kinds of features coming now in X2 over things like VST3.  If you and others in your position would send enough requests to CW for any particular feature, your wishes might just be granted one of these days.  CW is just trying to keep the greatest number of customers happy within the constraints of limited resources, just as any decent company would do. 
 
No DAW (or product of any kind) can be perfect for everyone, so there will always be those who wish Sonar was just a little different.  It's not worth throwing tantrums over, it's just the way the world is.  You take what you can get and make it work.  But hey, if someone had shown you ten years ago what was possible with ITB music production today, wouldn't your mind have been blown?  We do live in amazing times, eh?

Cheers,
Eddie

Eddie,
 
First and foremost, you cannot base your Company position on the "feature requests" of a forum.
They should be considered in view of the WHOLE INDUSTRY.  Not given the ultimate weight of
what to implement.  This is merely common sense and good Business Practice.

VST 3 is an INDUSTRY...not social or political STANDARD...and, no matter how much Cake hates Steinberg,
they have been the drivers of this from the onset and you can rest assured that's not changing anytime soon.

I could go into a whole of detail, but, after reading these posts....
 
It would be pointless...

Cheers


James_S
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 54
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 04:04:41
  • Location: Sheffield, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:37:01 (permalink)
cclarry

Noel,
 
This is a very unreasonable reply  - from the CTO especially.
Waves plugins rely on the VST 3 standard for some of their better functionality.
FabFilter Plugins rely on VST 3 standard as well, and most other Plugin manufacturers
and DAW's are supporting this format.


Really....really...really...who's being fooled here?

Fabfilter plugins all come as both vst2 and vst3 with no functional difference between them. They don't rely on vst3 at all.
I'm not quite sure why you are trying to undermine cakewalk at the moment, but it's just coming across as a personal rant now ...

Cheers
James


cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:39:21 (permalink)
firefly9000


NEW VST 3 Features - from steinberg site.

Improved performance

Managing large plug-in sets and multiple virtual instruments on typical studio computer systems can often be difficult because of CPU performance limits. VST3 helps to improve overall performance by applying processing to plug-ins only when audio signals are present on their respective inputs. Instead of always processing input signals, VST3 plug-ins can apply their processing economically and only when it is needed. Multiple dynamic I/Os

VST3 plug-ins are no longer limited to a fixed number of inputs and outputs. Their I/O configuration can dynamically adapt to the channel configuration they’re inserted in, meaning that any VST3 plug-in can be surround-capable with true multi-channel processing. For example, all the new VST3 plug-ins in Nuendo 4 can work in stereo-mode when inserted into a stereo channel, but switch to 6 channels when inserted into a 5.1 channel. Each audio channel is processed independently. Interaction between channels depends on the type and design of the plug-in. In addition to their flexible audio bussing capabilities, VST3 plug-ins may also offer a dedicated event bus. Typically, this is a MIDI input for control/modulation but these busses are no longer restricted to MIDI standard only. Future plug-ins may replace the common MIDI interface with alternative methods of control. Activating/deactivating busses

A typical issue with current virtual instruments is their audio output bussing system and how they’re connected to the mixer after loading. Especially virtual samplers with multiple outputs often occupy more mixer channels than need. The VST3 interface offers the possibility to deactivate unused busses after loading and even reactivate those when needed. This cleans up the mixer and further helps to reduce CPU load. Resizable edit windows

VST3 introduces a new approach to plug-in GUIs though window resizing, allowing for extremely flexible use of valuable screen space. Sample-accurate automation

VST3 also features vastly improved parameter automation with sample accuracy and support for ‘ramped’ automation data, allowing completely accurate and rapid parameter automation changes. Logical parameter organization

The plug-in parameters are displayed in a tree structure. Parameters are grouped into sections which represent the structure of the plug-in. Parameters like “Cutoff” and “Resonance” could be grouped into a section called “Filter”. This makes searching for a certain parameters easier, such as on an automation track. This also allows assigning a group of parameters to a specific MIDI Channel input and audio output bus. Optional VST3/SKI combination

As a direct result of the modular interface design of VST3, the Steinberg Kernel Interface (SKI) can be combined with VST3 plug-ins. SKI is an additional SDK that allows extremely close integration of a plug-in with a Steinberg host application, and allows functions to be carried out almost from within the application. This extends to the ability to create tracks, copy, cut, paste or process events in the Steinberg host application. SKI is provided to selected industry partners upon request. VSTXML for remote controllers

Remote controllers for audio and MIDI software applications have become increasingly popular. With VSTXML, VST3 offers far more flexible control of VST plug-ins by remote controllers. Using the knobs and faders on the control surface, parameters can be recorded, renamed and edited in many ways. Parameters that cannot be edited can be routed for display purposes to the control surface, for example to show Gain Reduction on compressor. UTF16 for localized parameter naming

In VST3, all strings that can be displayed to the user are in Unicode (UTF16) format. Usage of this universal character base allows the host application to display characters in localized languages. No MIDI restriction for parameter value transfers

VST3 has a dedicated interface for event handling that carries a much wider range of functionality than standard MIDI events would be able to provide. This opens up a big range of opportunities for musical use cases with very high potential for innovative product design. For example with VST3 some controller events (for example, pitch) can be referred to a note event (using a note unique ID). This offers the possibility to e.g. modulate only a single note which itself is part of a chord. Audio inputs for VST instruments

The VST3 interface expands VST instruments by adding the ability to create audio input busses. As a result, audio data can be routed to an VST3 instrument. A synthesizer which has a built-in e.g. vocoder effect is able to process audio data coming in from other sources as well. Multiple MIDI inputs/outputs

Unlike with VST 2.x,, a VST3 plug-in can have more than only one MIDI input or one MIDI output at the same time. 64-bit processing

VST3 plug-ins are generally able to process audio data in 64-bit.


I referenced this earlier...the die hards who don't care, including the CTO, are going to argue the "unimportance" of this into the ground.

Time will tell....


cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:43:19 (permalink)
James_S


cclarry

Noel,

This is a very unreasonable reply  - from the CTO especially.
Waves plugins rely on the VST 3 standard for some of their better functionality.
FabFilter Plugins rely on VST 3 standard as well, and most other Plugin manufacturers
and DAW's are supporting this format.


Really....really...really...who's being fooled here?

Fabfilter plugins all come as both vst2 and vst3 with no functional difference between them. They don't rely on vst3 at all.
I'm not quite sure why you are trying to undermine cakewalk at the moment, but it's just coming across as a personal rant now ...

Cheers
James



FabFilter Plugins, if using VST 3, would greatly benefit from it.  Just read the info...


cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:45:24 (permalink)
dantarbill


I've had WaveLab 7 since it was first released.  It supports VST3 and includes a number of VST3 plugs.  I use WaveLab more regularly than I use SONAR (I'm afraid).  I have yet to have even opened a VST3 plug...or had a need to.
 
I think there's a much more compelling case for implementing ARA support than VST3 at this point...especially if your development resources are constrained.

I definitely agree with your last statement and I really hope that Cakewalk prioritizes ARA over VST3.  The Melodyne ARA integration in Studio One v2 makes a huge difference and I personally prefer Melodyne by far over V-Vocal.  I have used the VST3 versions of many plugins in both Wavelab 7 and Studio One v2, but honestly haven't really realized much, if any, benefit from it.  That said, there are compelling reasons to support  VST3  and I'm glad to see that Cakewalk is planning on adding support for it. 

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

BEATZM1D10T
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 285
  • Joined: 2009/05/22 12:43:50
  • Location: Mid-West
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:47:17 (permalink)
The fail is strong in this thread.
 
The de-facto industry standard doesn't even support VST 2.4. or AU....
Now don't fall back on the 'most installed' b.s. That in no way quantifies actual work being done in the industry.
James_S
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 54
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 04:04:41
  • Location: Sheffield, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:47:37 (permalink)
cclarry


James_S


cclarry

Noel,

This is a very unreasonable reply  - from the CTO especially.
Waves plugins rely on the VST 3 standard for some of their better functionality.
FabFilter Plugins rely on VST 3 standard as well, and most other Plugin manufacturers
and DAW's are supporting this format.


Really....really...really...who's being fooled here?

Fabfilter plugins all come as both vst2 and vst3 with no functional difference between them. They don't rely on vst3 at all.
I'm not quite sure why you are trying to undermine cakewalk at the moment, but it's just coming across as a personal rant now ...

Cheers
James



FabFilter Plugins, if using VST 3, would greatly benefit from it.  Just read the info...

I have the plugins - I don't recall seeing any functions that are only available in vst3. 
backwoods
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2571
  • Joined: 2011/03/23 17:24:50
  • Location: South Pacific
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:50:18 (permalink)
ccLarry and his VST3 fetish is about as tiresome as Silktone and his midi-cross-chatter obsession  


Poor old Noel having to come on and defend himself against this tripe. It's like Spike Milligan wrote "Einstein could stand in front of a class of 30 monkeys and lecture them for ten years but at the end of that time they'd still all be monkeys."


I own Nuendo5 in addition to Sonar. For fabfilter there is no difference except the VST3 ones put themselves into the dynamics folder automatically. Big Deal!
bladetragic
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 503
  • Joined: 2009/09/12 04:49:24
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:54:59 (permalink)
Linear Phase


cclarry


.......

NOT WISE...

Cheers!
"not wise?"  What happens when Cakewalk does add vst3?   Sonar is definitely Cubase's main competitor, so what do you think Yama/Stein is going to do?  
 
 
I HIGHLY, HIGHLY doubt this.  I love Sonar and all, but I have a strong feeling that Pro Tools, Logic, FL Studio, and probably even Abelton are all higher up on that list of competitors.  Maybe a couple others as well.  I think Sonar has a very small user base actually.  I very rarely encounter anyone in the professional world using Sonar.  I come across people using the others that I mentioned all the time.  Honestly, when I mention Sonar to most people I just get met w/ a blank stare, usually followed by a question as to why don't I use (insert other program here).  LOL!  I think some of you guys might need to get out a little more.

Scott Lee
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1120
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:13:38
  • Location: Hollywood, California
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:55:41 (permalink)
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk
]

cclarry


Noel,

If the VST3 implementation is "of such low importance" to Cakewalk...

THEN WHY HAS EVERY OTHER MAJOR DAW AND PLUG IN MANUFACTURER
(except NO TOOLS- RTAS) adpoted it and chosen to implement it...even without
a MAJOR release???

I'm really just curious...

Just becaue Cakewalk doesn't deem it important doesn't make it NOT IMPORTANT...

WOW...how CRAZY is that....???"

I'm happy to know it's in the pipeline...but, as always, Cake has FAILED to make
a pre-empitive strike at CURRENT technologies for the sake of their users...
instead choosing to focus and give us MORE feature improvements that have been
available in other DAWS for awhile....while touting their massive benefits...
and overshadowing the NEED, addressed by an INDUSTRY STANDARD API,
to implement such protocol in their software???

Why is it that ALL MANUFACTURERS, BUSINESSES, etc....play POLITICS...
and instead of saying...OOOPS...we'll fix it...
they play politics and say....

PAY NOT ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!!

INSTEAD....LOOK OVER HEAR....

Blah...

Love the SOFTWARE...HATE THE BS...

Cheers!





>>but, as always, Cake has FAILED to make  pre-empitive strike at CURRENT technologies for the sake of their users... 

As always, really? How about being the first to support X64, supporting every single processor architecture, preemptive support for every version of Windows to name just a few. VST3 being lower importance not arbitrarily decided, as I outlined in my message. There are plenty of things we did in X2 that were way higher in the feature list that the vast majority of users would benefit from before VST3. We do features in response to the volume of customer requests. VST3 has been way at the bottom of that pile. 

Anyway I've said what I have to say on this topic so there is no point in beating it to death here. It has absolutely nothing to do with politics but everything to do with supporting the most immediate needs of our user base first, and making the best use of our engineering resources.

VST3 is a mandatory component for Melodyne's integration api. Having melodyne integration within Sonar Xx does seem like a sought after feature many would like to see. VST3 does give the end user more options plugin / hardware wise. The question is how much? NAMM will be interesting this year I believe to sort out some of the misconceptions of industry standards. For me personally, I get more functionality out of my Access Virus TI via VST3. Not a game changer in any regards, but options nonetheless. 

post edited by Scott Lee - 2012/09/06 18:02:18

Scott Lee (ASCAP)
SFX Media 
Song Composer / Engineer / Audio Director

http://www.youtube.com/user/Dezacrator?feature=mhee

BEATZM1D10T
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 285
  • Joined: 2009/05/22 12:43:50
  • Location: Mid-West
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:55:45 (permalink)
backwoods


ccLarry and his VST3 fetish is about as tiresome as Silktone and his midi-cross-chatter obsession  


Poor old Noel having to come on and defend himself against this tripe. It's like Spike Milligan wrote "Einstein could stand in front of a class of 30 monkeys and lecture them for ten years but at the end of that time they'd still all be monkeys."


I own Nuendo5 in addition to Sonar. For fabfilter there is no difference except the VST3 ones put themselves into the dynamics folder automatically. Big Deal!

bu.but.but! Virtual Studio Technology 3 or 3.5 now is .6 or 1.1 higher over Virtual Studio Technology 2.4! It's just better!
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:56:54 (permalink)
Noel!
 
You said that Pro Channel is based on VST 2.4 standard. Why did you base it on VST 2.4 when you could make it for VST 3.0? That seems not wise to me. It seems you haven’t really thought about the FUTURE at all at Cakewalk.   
VST 3.0 has been out over 4 years now so it’s just matter of time before VST2.4 die, ends? You know, I don’t see any VST 1.0 plugins around on the market anymore… same will happen with VST 2.4 too.
 
It’s just a matter of time before VST 3.0 going to be the only standard in any DAW, next up will be VST 4.0
 
Then you sit there with Pro Channel in VST2.4 format that you have invest time and money in that are outdate that no one can actually use. Strange politic?



-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
firefly9000
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 87
  • Joined: 2012/05/23 21:48:03
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 17:59:57 (permalink)
Sorry cclarry, must have missed your post.

I'm not sure how those new features don't matter, but to each his own. I understand the feeling some people have: VsT3 just isn't that implemented yet so why make such a fuss.

While I DO get that, I also want to remind everybody that the future moves forward (as silly as it sounds - nobody does version 2.0 of something then later on comes with version 1) and things TAKE TIME TO IMPLEMENT. They also go through a lot of beta, or bug removal processes that ARE NOT INSTANT. You know, those moments when you tear your hair out because something isn't working just right :)

Jumping on new technology is smart because it let's you implement it and work out the kinks, while also being prepared when exclusive VsT3 comes out. So when the inevitable happens you don't get caught with your pants down.

To wait around with new plugs while Cake get VsT3 ready and tries to iron out kinks isn't my idea of fun.

I do plan on updating my Waves collection later on and going into UAD territory.
Mystic38
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1622
  • Joined: 2010/08/30 17:40:34
  • Location: Mystic, CT
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 18:01:18 (permalink)
i am more happy with x2 than with the non appearance of vst3, and have preordered..but luckily i can live without it, as i have had to do so for 2 years... and to all members that say it does not matter, please note that had i not had sonar before i purchased a yamaha synth i would not be a sonar customer today.

In the technical argument of merit, i totally defer to Noel and his comments, however, the industry and the customer base will not care about the realities of technically being able to do things in vst2.4 that are in vst3, the industry will care about the perception that vst3 is superior and therefore that its support is required. I do not believe any magazine review of a daw will say vst3 support is not needed... clearly to have it is a plus..to not have it, a minus.

Folks that purchase $3500 synths that only support vst3 will buy a daw that supports vst3..and their voices will never be heard here.. they wont be doing feature requests.
folks that spend thousands on expensive plugs that support vst3 where the supplier has stated vst3 gives greater performance or that vst2.4 support days are numbered will need a daw that supports vst3.. and you may not hear their voices here... current customers give feature requests, not customers cakewalk never had.

Cake have done a marvellous job with x1, and now x2, and opened up to (i believe) a greater market share... success is in growing that market share with new customers... not simply trying to keep current customers happy, and fwiw at the time when enough users of sonar state they must have vst3 .. it simply will be too late.. those that must have vst3 will have moved on before it is implemented by cakewalk...


HPE-580T with i7-950, 8G, 1.5T, ATI6850, Win7/64, Motu 828 III Hybrid, Motu Midi Express, Sonar Platinum, Komplete 9, Ableton Live 9 & Push 2, Melodyne Editor and other stuff, KRK VXT8 Monitors
Virus Ti2 Polar, Fantom G6, Yamaha S70XS, Novation Nova, Novation Nova II, Korg MS2000, Waldorf Micro Q, NI Maschine Studio, TC-VoiceLive Rack, 2012 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 2001 Gibson Les Paul DC, 1999 Fender Am Hardtail Strat, Fender Blues Jr, Orange TH30/PPC212, Tak EF360GF, one mic, no talent.
BEATZM1D10T
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 285
  • Joined: 2009/05/22 12:43:50
  • Location: Mid-West
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 18:02:45 (permalink)
Freddie H


Noel!
 
You said that Pro Channel is based on VST 2.4 standard. Why in God name did you base it on VST 2.4 when you could make it for VST 3.0? That seems not wise to me. It seems you haven’t really thought about the FUTURE at all at Cakewalk.   
VST 3.0 has been out over 4 years now so it’s just matter of time before VST2.4 die, ends? You know, I don’t see any VST 1.0 plugins around on the market anymore… same will happen with VST 2.4 too.It’s just a matter of time before VST 3.0 going to be the only standard in any DAW, next up will be VST 4.0
 
Then you site there with Pro Channel in VST2.4 format that you have invest time and money in that are outdate that no one can actually use.


Ummm, probably because it's cheaper/easier/faster to add a new feature into a core application that has an API already implemented and for all intensive purposes 'proofed'. I'd really like to see some of you try to run a successful software company. Especially in this current market.
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 18:04:12 (permalink)
Mystic38


i am more happy with x2 than with the non appearance of vst3, and have preordered..but luckily i can live without it, as i have had to do so for 2 years... and to all members

Let’s see how happy you are next year when you can‘t use example the Native Komplete instruments and NI Maschine...Waves....and so on... 
Vocal rider are the first Wave plugin that are only support VST 3, more will come.


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 18:10:15 (permalink)
..........User: ... So I had Vocal Rider for a while now and I couldn't use it with Sonar ... That plug uses the VST3 side chaining STANDARD that cakewalk ... fire it back up...but only to be shot down again with this VST3 thingy not supported.
 
 



-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 18:15:34 (permalink)
BEATZM1D10T


Freddie H


Noel!
 
You said that Pro Channel is based on VST 2.4 standard. Why in God name did you base it on VST 2.4 when you could make it for VST 3.0? That seems not wise to me. It seems you haven’t really thought about the FUTURE at all at Cakewalk.   
VST 3.0 has been out over 4 years now so it’s just matter of time before VST2.4 die, ends? You know, I don’t see any VST 1.0 plugins around on the market anymore… same will happen with VST 2.4 too.It’s just a matter of time before VST 3.0 going to be the only standard in any DAW, next up will be VST 4.0
 
Then you site there with Pro Channel in VST2.4 format that you have invest time and money in that are outdate that no one can actually use.


Ummm, probably because it's cheaper/easier/faster to add a new feature into a core application that has an API already implemented and for all intensive purposes 'proofed'.
I'd really like to see some of you try to run a successful software company. Especially in this current market.


Sure, but you need to invest in the future to be successful. Always pay off in the long run! If SONAR wouldn’t implemented x64bit in an early state I had never been a SONAR user. Think about it! 
If I run Cakewalk, VST3 and ARA been implemented years ago..Its FREE too you know 
 


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 18:21:12 (permalink)
firefly9000


Sorry cclarry, must have missed your post.

I'm not sure how those new features don't matter, but to each his own. I understand the feeling some people have: VsT3 just isn't that implemented yet so why make such a fuss.

While I DO get that, I also want to remind everybody that the future moves forward (as silly as it sounds - nobody does version 2.0 of something then later on comes with version 1) and things TAKE TIME TO IMPLEMENT. They also go through a lot of beta, or bug removal processes that ARE NOT INSTANT. You know, those moments when you tear your hair out because something isn't working just right :)

Jumping on new technology is smart because it let's you implement it and work out the kinks, while also being prepared when exclusive VsT3 comes out. So when the inevitable happens you don't get caught with your pants down.

To wait around with new plugs while Cake get VsT3 ready and tries to iron out kinks isn't my idea of fun.

I do plan on updating my Waves collection later on and going into UAD territory.
Couldn't agree more Firefly...
 
It's better to be the FIRST on the bandwagon, spend the money NOW, and iron out the kinks...then to be LAST on the bandwagon, spend TWICE the money later, and get left with an arrow in your head...


firefly9000
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 87
  • Joined: 2012/05/23 21:48:03
  • Status: offline
Re:This just in .... X2 DOES NOT SUPPORT VST3 ..per Robin 2012/09/06 18:25:15 (permalink)
Folks, this will go the VsT3 way, like it or not, for the following reason (if nothing else): As another commenter mentioned - once the pro-music press got a hold of VsT3 it won't let go. This will lead to more plugin makers going the VsT3 way. You can comment on the merits of VsT2.4 all you want. Also, I find the idea that Steinberg added absolutely no value to the VsT3 protocols, and VsT2.4 is just as good or better, a bit hard to swallow. They probably pump up the benefits, as any developer/manufacturer does for marketing purposes, but it's hard to believe that VsT3 is the same or has less possibilities and is worse off that 2.4.
post edited by firefly9000 - 2012/09/06 18:35:36
Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 4 of 9
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1