awilki01
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 817
- Joined: 2005/09/20 23:58:29
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/03/24 02:55:01
(permalink)
I have the Virus TI Desktop. I have it connected to my PC via USB exclusively at the moment. I have my MIDI controller connected to USB as well. When I open Sonar 6, I can load Virus Control and play the Virus with my MIDI controller. Keep in mind this is only with a USB connected to my Virus TI. So, it seems as though I will have to connect its audio outputs to my PC. Which audio output? Analog/SPDIF? How do I make the Virus send out on those? Just so you know, I have my Virus configured as an audio device on my PC. I can listen to MP3s, etc now via my Virus. Within Sonar 6, however, the Virus audio device is 'grayed' out and I cannot select it as an input device. Is this because Sonar doesn't fully support it yet? I guess I just need detailed instructions on how to connect this beast up to my PC. I'm not sure if my Audigy 2 soundcard can handle the inputs. I thought one of the points of the Virus TI was that it could be your audio device..............be honest with me....do I need to go with something like Cubase to get the full benefit of my TI? Adam
post edited by awilki01 - 2007/03/24 03:06:09
|
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4724
- Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/03/24 13:04:16
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: awilki01 So, it seems as though I will have to connect its audio outputs to my PC. Which audio output? Analog/SPDIF? How do I make the Virus send out on those? Are you referring to recording the sounds from your Virus into Sonar, or using the Virus as your soundcard? I don't typically use the Virus as my soundcard per se, but I can tell how to connect it for recording it into Sonar. I use the analog Output 1 on my Virus, but you could use the S/PDIF if your soundcard supports it. The Virus should automatically send the signal to the S/PDIF output. See page 133 on your manual to set the analog outputs, but I believe that it is set to Output 1 (L & R) by default. Connect the MIDI IN of the Virus to the MIDI OUT of your soundcard, and vice versa. ...the Virus audio device is 'grayed' out and I cannot select it as an input device. Is this because Sonar doesn't fully support it yet? No, Sonar supports it. I just tried it and had no problem using my Polar as both an input and output device. In Sonar, go to Options > Audio, then select the Drivers tab in the Audio Options dialog box. I would start by deselecting everything in both the Input Drivers and Output Drivers boxes, then select Virus USB ASIO IN as your input and Virus USB ASIO OUT for your output. You'll have to restart Sonar for the changes to take effect. Hopefully, this works, but if not, then something else needs to be changed in Sonar's audio options. ...I'm not sure if my Audigy 2 soundcard can handle the inputs. I'm not sure either - does it have two 1/4" inputs? If not, you'll need to get adapters or use S/PDIF if your soundcard supports it. FWIW, I have an E-mu 0404 USB that is dedicated to the Virus to get around the realtime rendering issue. The 0404 has two Neutrik inputs (XLR/1/4"), S/PDIF, and MIDI In/Out. It sells for $199, works great, and is a much better soundcard than the Audigy. I thought one of the points of the Virus TI was that it could be your audio device..............be honest with me....do I need to go with something like Cubase to get the full benefit of my TI? Yes, it can be your audio device with Sonar. I also have Cubase SL3 and the TI performs the same way and I get the same error message when trying to bounce the TI to audio. Granted, I'm not as well-versed in Cubase as I am in Sonar, so there may be some user error going on there. Regardless, a cheaper way to go would be to upgrade your soundcard while Cakewalk/Access work out the compatibility issues. Besides, have you been to the Cubase forums recently? Not a happy bunch of campers! One last thing - if you haven't already done so, go to the Access website and make sure your Virus OS and Virus Control software are up to date - they released updates to both just recently. HTH. -Dave p.s. I checked out your tunes - very cool! I'm a fellow trancehead.
|
awilki01
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 817
- Joined: 2005/09/20 23:58:29
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/03/25 11:51:43
(permalink)
Cryo, thanks for the response!!!!! I went and got me the E-MU 0404 USB and it works great. I'm piping the S/PDIF out of my Virus TI into it. It takes some playing around to get it sync'd up right at first, but once there, its rock solid. I am able to effectively use Virus Control plugin within Sonar 6 just like a VST. During playback and such I listen to the audio via USB. When I want to record the audio, I just open a new Audio track and have the input as the S/PDIF on the 0404. When I want to do this, I have to go to the Virus Control COMMON tab and move the slider over to SECOND OUT on the Surround Balance. I have my Second Out mapped to Out1 L+R. The S/PDIF connector mirrors that output. So, it looks like I'm good to go so for....I'll post here if I run into any other problems. Thanks for the advice...it was a lifesave.... Adam
|
ddr400
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16
- Joined: 2006/04/20 15:28:30
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/04/11 08:17:22
(permalink)
|
Elixirjam
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 26
- Joined: 2007/02/22 18:53:02
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/04/11 12:24:03
(permalink)
I've just seen this thread. I got a Virus TI keyboard edition last week. I've had major probelms installing it into Sonar. It totally froze Sonar and dropped my soundcard. I sorted all this out except it has thrown the latency of my VST's out. Still need to get this sorted. I could get midi info going into Sonar but absolutly no audio. I only used the USB cable because I was told all audio would go through this. I'm using Sonar 4. Still stumped. Any ideas?
|
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4724
- Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/04/12 18:28:03
(permalink)
I just got the email announcing the release of OS 2.0.3. I'm not sure if there are any fixes with regard to the Sonar issues, but I'll check it out this evening. Anybody else installed it yet? The download comes with some new videos and some new sound banks that the users on the Access forums are raving (no pun intended) about!
|
ddr400
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16
- Joined: 2006/04/20 15:28:30
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/04/13 03:50:47
(permalink)
no fixes for sonar in 2.0.3
|
mystp
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 64
- Joined: 2003/11/17 10:35:36
- Location: Denmark
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/08 04:35:01
(permalink)
Hi everyone The problems with the Virus TI and Sonar are now being investigated, so it'd be great if you could help in putting together a list of the Sonar-specific issues encountered with the Virus TI/Virus Control. I've not used Virus Control for a while due to the issues I had with it, so the problem descriptions below may need some corrections. If so, please let me know. So far I have: 1. Latency The VC (Virus Control) plugin seems to work okay as far as latency is concerned when it's the only plugin running. However, once you add any other plugins in addition to VC, all the other plugins are delayed to an extent that they’re practically unplayable (presumably to make up for the delay added by the VC plugin). In OS2.0, Access added a direct mode (clicking the D-button for the desired channel), which is to be used when recording an instrument on that particular channel. This causes the VC plugin to output via the TI’s analog outs rather than its USB output, which effectively gets rid of any delay while recording. However, since no other plugins have this workaround, they get the dreaded latency added. What this means in practical terms is that other plugins are not really usable while the VC plugin is loaded (ie pretty much all the time in a real-world scenario), as severe latency is added to them. If you disable the VC plugin in the synth rack, all other plugins can be used as usual, with no latency added. 2. Audio driver not exposed in Sonar There's no way of adjusting any of the Virus TI ASIO-USB settings, as Sonar does not seem to expose the TI ASIO-USB Control Panel at all (see attached image). However, I'm actually a bit unsure if the Virus TI audio driver is required in relation to the VC, or if it's only relevant when the TI is being used as a regular audio interface – but I’m guessing this could help with the VC-plugin’s latency as well. With regard to USB bouncing: It's been quite a while since I experimented with VC and USB recording, so I'm a little rusty on this aspect. As far as I recall, you could do regular - as in realtime - recording of USB tracks but not faster-than-realtime bounces akin to Sonar's freeze - correct? If not, could someone chime in on the specific issues in this respect? Let me know if there are any clarifications to the above, and if there are any additional issues that need addressing and I'll pass them on. Thanks! - Asbjoern
|
JamminFool
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 386
- Joined: 2004/01/07 20:19:41
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/08 06:50:34
(permalink)
hi mystp, i don't own the virus ti yet, but i watch from afar with great interest. thanks for pushing this issue.
|
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4724
- Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/08 10:18:11
(permalink)
Hi Asbjoern, I also saw your thread on the Unofficial Virus Forums - thanks for taking the lead on this and let me know if/how I can assist you. I'm dying to see the track rendering issue resolved (i.e., one of the primary reasons I upgraded to a TI). ORIGINAL: mystp With regard to USB bouncing: It's been quite a while since I experimented with VC and USB recording, so I'm a little rusty on this aspect. As far as I recall, you could do regular - as in realtime - recording of USB tracks but not faster-than-realtime bounces akin to Sonar's freeze - correct? If not, could someone chime in on the specific issues in this respect? You cannot do any sort of bouncing/freezing/rendering in Sonar, real-time or fast-bounce (at least I can't). I've gotten real-time bouncing to work in Cubase, but who wants to use Cubase?! The workaround in Sonar has been to either 1) reassign a sequenced track to MIDI out and into an analog audio input(s) routed to a new track as you would with any hardware synth or 2) loop the outputs of the soundcard back into another set of inputs, solo the Virus track and record it in real-time to a new track. Both approaches typically require some after-the-fact nudging to get account for latency. The audio rendering issue and the well-documented latency issue that you mentioned are the only ones that I have personally experienced.
|
soundsubs
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 496
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:28:52
- Location: denver
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/08 11:56:04
(permalink)
Asbjoern--- thanks for looking into this. I have been using sonar (6.2) and the TI (polar, recent update) for a long time with Sonar. I am using the 1/4" ouputs exclusively. It seems that when using any other soundcard device in addition to the TI, the TI becomes greyed out under AUDIO PROPERTIES and therefore unusable. I believe everyone ive emailed about this can confirm the same behavior inside Sonar, and I even removed my FF800 once and saw that the TI was indeed able to be used in Sonar. Still, bouncing audio faster than realtime doesnt work for anyone. Im not sure if it works in other DAW software that IS fully supported by Access. I hope this gets resolved, as it stands now, the TI part of the Virus is just a nice graphic editor that i close when i want to actually use the TI to make music. ----------shane
|
Destructo
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 93
- Joined: 2003/11/18 17:22:11
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/08 15:14:06
(permalink)
One thing to add even though I've seen it said a bunch of times already in other places: it would be so SO awesome if Access would make a patch browser/editor only (no audio) version of the VC plugin!! To be honest, I'm not sure what the point is of having audio through usb if you're not using the virus as your sound card (I would love to hear an explanation for this... something to do with automation maybe?) - why not just use spdif (into fireface in my case) and midi cc for automation... at least you can copy and paste midi envelopes... sonar has a bug that keeps you from copying and pasting recorded automation envelopes. I shouldn't really complain though... virust TI and Sonar 6 PE are two of the best music products I've ever used.
|
parke02
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 45
- Joined: 2007/01/25 15:46:11
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/08 19:06:22
(permalink)
Edited from my other post. I can add an instance of the TI to the synth rack on a new project and I can play/record it without any problems. If I add TI to an older project that has a couple audio tracks and an instance of Imposcar, the audio engine will no longer start if I press "play" on the transport. However, it will start if I press "record" instead. If I change the input of the TI audio track to "none", the audio engine will work properly again. However, if I raise the buffer settings to 512 samples, the audio engine works fine. On this particular project, CPU was barely over 5% per core. Did some tests: 1) On another problem project (1 instance of Imposcar and DKS drums), I added the TI. Audio engine won't play. I remove Imposcar and DKS from the synth rack. Audio engine still won't play. I deleted the audio tracks and track folders for Imposcar and DKS. Only thing remaining is TI track folders and TI in synth rack. Removing TI from synth rack does nothing... audio engine still won't play. I have to delete the remaining TI track folder before the audio engine will play again. I re-add the TI into the synth rack and create the track folder and audio engine plays. 2) I create a new project, add TI and record a midi clip. Add Imposcar, DKS, and midi clips. Add a couple audio tracks and some audio clips. Audio engine is OK and project plays fine. Essentially, this new project has the exact same vsts and # of tracks but plays fine. I then add 4+ Cpu heavy vsts, CPU usage is now up to ~50% per core, but the audio engine continues to play perfectly w/o a single skip with a 128 sample buffer size. huh??
|
ddr400
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16
- Joined: 2006/04/20 15:28:30
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/09 05:37:16
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Destructo sonar has a bug that keeps you from copying and pasting recorded automation envelopes. you can insert VC into fx bin and copy/paste works fine....
|
mystp
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 64
- Joined: 2003/11/17 10:35:36
- Location: Denmark
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/09 16:16:56
(permalink)
Thanks for the support - glad to be of help. We'll see how much eventually gets sorted, but at least we can make sure that they know what the issues are. If there are any other problems, let me know and I'll add them to the list. Cryo and soundsubs: Thanks for the input and clarification - appreciate it, and the info's been added to the list! Destructo: Yes, that would be incredibly handy. That one's for Access to sort out, but I totally agree. Parke02: OK, thanks for the heads up - haven't experienced this myself, but it's been noted. What audio card are you using, by the way, and is ImpOscar always involved when the problem arises? - Asbjoern
post edited by mystp - 2007/05/09 16:31:54
|
idoben2
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 37
- Joined: 2006/09/02 14:06:22
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/10 17:32:35
(permalink)
I posted the issues I saw over at the VirusTI forum, I'll post it on this thread too: IDO'S GUIDE TO SONAR To start, Sonar works with the TI in "standalone mode" very well. To be clear, that means that you have a MIDI cable going from your computer into the TI. Since my audio-card (Audiophile 2496) supports SPDIF digital audio, I hook the SPDIF-OUT of the TI into my audio-card. This works incredibly well. If you don't have SPDIF, you'd need to record the analog-outs from the TI using your sound-card. The down-sides to "stand-alone mode" are: 1) You obviously don't get the "patch librarian" functionality of the VirusControl VST. 2) It's a pain-in-the-but to get patch-libraries from the internet into the TI, since you have to do a SYSEX dump into the TI RAM banks. Using VirusControl VST, it's much easier, for instance, to load the patches from the Virus C. 3) You don't get the "total recall" of VirusControl VST. I.e. you have to save all of your patches as a "Multi" on the TI, and load the right one manually each time you load up a song in SOnar. Remember that Access has the instrument mappings for the built-in patches of the TI on their website. This makes it easy to pick instruments that are built-in. BUT, it's sort of bogus, because Sonar will always re-load the patch each time you hit play. So if you're not clever, you can make changes to the patch, and then have them wiped-out when you hit play, since Sonar reloads the original patch. So, not quite sure what the point of the instrument mappings is really... Now, alternatively to "stand-alone mode", you can also use VirusControl VST with Sonar. Unfortunately, Sonar is not OFFICiALLY supported as a host, so you're playing with fire here. There's no magic to how to set this up, just install the VirusControl software on your machine, and make sure you follow all the instructions. It will automatically create a new VST for you that will sync with the Virus TI through the USB connection, and this VST will be configured with delay-compensation. Delay compensation is necessary to the the TI in-sync with your host, since the USB-audio is delayed. Actually, one note: In Virus OS version 1.2.4, they fixed some serious timing issues in Sonar. But to keep things working, you'll need to follow the standard VirusControl advice: --Set the patch to "direct-audio" in VirusControl VST when recording. --Immediately after recording, turn "direct-audio" off. Do not deviate from this! --Never try to disable delay-compensation on the plugin. It just won't work. I've tried this from every angle... Now, here's the peculiarities I've noticed with Sonar: 1) Trying to render audio so that you can do post-production (etc) is totally broken with VirusControl. As a workaround, you'll need an audio-card that let's you record "loop-back". I have the Audiophile 2496, and it lets you do this. Double-check on your audio-card. TO BE CLEAR, you can't bounce-audio as you can with other VSTs. You also can't "freeze" the VirusControl VST. That's what I mean when I say you can't render audio... 2) It's not officially supported by Access, so if you're buying the TI to use with VirusControl, you're taking a risk that it might not work with the next OS update. 3) Sonar does not expose any way to change the samples that the USB audio is delayed. To be honest, I assume that other hosts let you do this, but for some reason Sonar doesn't let you get at the TI's audio-driver parameters (I assume this is because it's not my primary audio-card?!) 4) Sonar's implementation of delay compensation is a pain-in-the-butt: When you load a VST that is delay-compensated (i.e. VirusControl VST), ALL OTHER PLUGINS are delayed. That means that once you load VirusControl VST, not only is the Virus noticeably delayed when you play a note (with USB-audio out), ALL OTHER PLUGINS are also delayed! This makes it really annoying to work on a song when VirusControl is loaded, since OTHER PLUGINS DON'T LET YOU CHOOSE "direct-out" on them like VirusControl does!!! Ug! My workaround to this is to temporarily UNLOAD the VirusControl plugin (in the Sonar instrument rack) when I want to work with other plugins. Works decently... -Ido
|
awilki01
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 817
- Joined: 2005/09/20 23:58:29
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/11 23:29:26
(permalink)
I just found something interesting. I had everything working pretty good and then all of a sudden all my other VSTs were way out of sync when I had the Virus Control plugin enabled in a project. I did some playing around and when I went into the ASIO control panel and changed it from 32 bit to 24 bit, it all started working again for me. I believe it was 24 bit before. Maybe I changed it on accident recently - not sure. There is a 'slight' delay with my other VSTs, but its in perfect sync with my Virus TI now - again. It's not anything that bothers me because its really a very small amount of delay. Any discrepancy in playing can be resolved with quantization after recording a clip using another VST. In Sonar6 (and probably 5), The ASIO control panel can be found Options:Audio:General Tab. To Ido, there is an option in the Virus Control to disable delay compensation. It doesn't sync up good when I do that, but it may work on your system (Edit: I see that you have already tried that now before. I missed that the first time I read your post). Just for the record, I use Virus Control with other VSTs just fine with my setup. Like I said, there is a very slight delay of my other VSTs, but its so small it doesn't bother me. Again, quantization fixes that for me because I only experience the delay when playing via my MIDI controller. There is no delay from the MIDI notes within my individual tracks. Now, when recording audio via my S/PDIF connection on my TI, I do get a very horrible delay. But, that is easily fixed with the Sonar nudge feature. You basically just record an entire TI track and then nudge it over so it's in sync with your other instruments. You should really only have to do this once for each Virus TI track at final mixdown. Adam Edit: I want to help you all out here. I am doing something different than the rest of you because I'm working fine. Is it a setting I have in Sonar? Is it my PC hardware? Just let me know how I can help you all in an effort to resolve this. I have a plethora of webspace so if you need me to post pics or videos or whatever of what I'm doing, let me know. I know this can be frustrating...
post edited by awilki01 - 2007/05/13 00:12:03
|
idoben2
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 37
- Joined: 2006/09/02 14:06:22
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/14 00:45:35
(permalink)
My Sonar Guide above mentions an issue where the VirusVST being loaded causes OTHER VSTs in Sonar to have a slight perceptible latency when you play notes live. To help Cakewalk/Access, here's my steps to reproduce this: I using Sonar 6.2 on Windows XPSP2. My soundcard is an MAudio Audiophile 2496. It's set to 44khz, 384 samples (~8ms latency) I do NOT use the VirusTI's audio as my computer's audio out (instead, I use the Audiophile 2496). I have Sonar set to use ASIO. The audio-driver bit-depth is 24. The Sonar recording bitdepth is 16. *** Make SURE that the VirusVST is configured for delay-compensation. Otherwise, this bug won't repro... My VirusTI has the latest TIOS (2.0.3). Repro: 1) Load the VirusTI VST into Sonar 2) Make sure the current part (#1) in the TI is NOT set to "direct out". (This means it should have some very small perceptible latency). 3) Now turn ON direct-out. You should feel each note played be slightly more responsive (i.e. the perceptible latency goes away). It's very slight, so pay attention... 4) Now load any synth. For this repro, I used Vanguard. EXPECT: I expect notes played to Vanguard should NOT have any perceptible latency, since I don't get such latency when VirusVST is loaded. ACTUAL: Notice that you feel the small perceptible latency when you play notes on Vanguard. -Ido
|
idoben2
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 37
- Joined: 2006/09/02 14:06:22
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/14 12:27:45
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: awilki01 There is a 'slight' delay with my other VSTs, but its in perfect sync with my Virus TI now - again..... ......To Ido, there is an option in the Virus Control to disable delay compensation. It doesn't sync up good when I do that, but it may work on your system Thanks Adam. As you mention above, there is a slight delay with the other VSTs. What's "slight" to you is most-likely "annoying" to me, sounds like we BOTH notice the slight delay of other VSTs, but it just bugs me more. :) Also, you mention that turning off delay compensation fixes the problem. Sure, it fixes that problem for me too, but adds a slew of other problems (including not being able to sync-up the TI to any music I write) - So it's a non-starter... If the VirusTI plugin worked without delay-compensation turned-off, I'm sure it would be great for a lot of people, but Access makes it clear that you NEED delay-compensation set on the plugin to make any of this work. -Ido
|
awilki01
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 817
- Joined: 2005/09/20 23:58:29
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/14 21:21:58
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: idoben2 ORIGINAL: awilki01 There is a 'slight' delay with my other VSTs, but its in perfect sync with my Virus TI now - again..... ......To Ido, there is an option in the Virus Control to disable delay compensation. It doesn't sync up good when I do that, but it may work on your system Thanks Adam. As you mention above, there is a slight delay with the other VSTs. What's "slight" to you is most-likely "annoying" to me, sounds like we BOTH notice the slight delay of other VSTs, but it just bugs me more. :) Also, you mention that turning off delay compensation fixes the problem. Sure, it fixes that problem for me too, but adds a slew of other problems (including not being able to sync-up the TI to any music I write) - So it's a non-starter... If the VirusTI plugin worked without delay-compensation turned-off, I'm sure it would be great for a lot of people, but Access makes it clear that you NEED delay-compensation set on the plugin to make any of this work. -Ido I actually leave the delay compensation on. I just thought I would run that past you. Is there a way to tell how much delay there is on the other VSTs? I would like to quantify it so we could compare real numbers instead of subjective interpretations of the delay. I wonder if we are indeed experiencing the same delay and it just bothers you more. That may very well be the case, but I would still nonetheless like to quantify it to be sure. Regards, Adam
|
idoben2
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 37
- Joined: 2006/09/02 14:06:22
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/15 15:37:02
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: awilki01 I actually leave the delay compensation on. I just thought I would run that past you. Is there a way to tell how much delay there is on the other VSTs? I would like to quantify it so we could compare real numbers instead of subjective interpretations of the delay. I wonder if we are indeed experiencing the same delay and it just bothers you more. That may very well be the case, but I would still nonetheless like to quantify it to be sure. Regards, Adam That's a great question Adam. I don't know of a way to measure the latency we each get for OTHER instruments loaded while VirusVST is loaded... However, here's one thing I can tell from your response: It sounds like even though the latency you see on other instruments is small and doesn't bother you, you notice that there's SOME delay compared to when VirusVST isn't loaded. I can tell you that that's enough to annoy me: Just being able to feel that something's not near-instant. We all spend a ton of money on our audio-cards to get VERY low-latency, and anything that is perceptable we just don't accept. It's sort of ridiculous that we pay a ton for our audio-cards, then buy a VERY expensive synth (TI) that completely busts the low latency that we have when playing our other VSTs. At least that's my opinion. -Ido
|
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4724
- Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/05/15 16:18:42
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: awilki01 It's sort of ridiculous that we pay a ton for our audio-cards, then buy a VERY expensive synth (TI) that completely busts the low latency that we have when playing our other VSTs. At least that's my opinion. Agreed. I was also able to replicate latency using my Virus TI and Vanguard, z3ta+, and RP Albino3 (the only 3 I experimented with). The latency when playing is just enough to be annoying, but can also throw off quantization on fast-moving passages. I also wonder if there are any differences in latency associated with the desktop vs the keyboard versions of the TI. This would probably be impossible to determine without one of each to compare side-by-side on the same system. Just curious Ido - which version of the TI are you using? I know Adam is using the desktop version and I have a Polar, which I use as my controller.
post edited by cryophonik - 2007/05/31 11:49:03
|
resenberg
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2007/06/17 09:37:59
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/06/18 07:57:05
(permalink)
I don't know if this might help, but I have been trying different configurations to manage the lowest latecy and this is what at least works for me fine: - Set up the Virus TI as main soundcard with all your softsyths routing though it and problem sorted, with this config im not gettting latency or crakles. I have only tried with 3 softsynths at the time (kontakt 2, Trilogy and the TI control). Regards to all.
AMD64X2 4800 - Virus TI Kyb - Supernova II Pro-X, Fs1R, Yamaha Cs6X & Rm1X, Roland Jx-305, Trilogy, Unitor 8, Focusrite Platinum Penta, Kontakt 2, Edriol M-16 DX
|
awilki01
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 817
- Joined: 2005/09/20 23:58:29
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/08/19 22:32:33
(permalink)
Anyone have any updates for this? Has anyone been able to resolve the delay issues? I recently set the ASIO driver down to 2-3 ms, and so far so good.
|
awilki01
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 817
- Joined: 2005/09/20 23:58:29
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/08/28 22:26:15
(permalink)
Has anyone tried out the new Virus TI OS 2.5?
|
ddr400
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16
- Joined: 2006/04/20 15:28:30
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/08/29 06:18:59
(permalink)
yes, i am more click&pops, glitches and still impossible bounce to track or mixdown.
|
Destructo
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 93
- Joined: 2003/11/18 17:22:11
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/08/29 07:29:31
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: ddr400 yes, i am more click&pops, glitches and still impossible bounce to track or mixdown. Awesome.
|
BlueSwan
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 343
- Joined: 2003/12/24 06:25:31
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/08/29 08:45:02
(permalink)
Wow! I'm glad I stumbled upon this thread. I was planning on selling my Virus C and getting a new Virus TI because of the DAW integration. Now, I think I'll spend that money on a coupe of kick-ass monitors instead.
|
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4724
- Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/08/29 10:53:30
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: ddr400 more click&pops, glitches and still impossible bounce to track or mixdown. No bounce/mixdown here either  , but I'm not experiencing any clicks/pops/glitches. Keep in mind that this is just a public beta release - at the very least, it indicates that the Access folks have finally opened their eyes to the importance of supporting Sonar. That's a huge and reassuring step in the right direction. We just need to make sure that we keep Access and Cakewalk informed so they can get this working. Question - are you guys uninstalling the old version before installing the beta OS? I did not and I'm wondering if that's the problem. I noticed this morning on the Unofficial Access forums that some users were having problems because they also did not uninstall the old version, so I'm going to try that this evening. Fingers crossed. Adam - have you installed it yet?
|
erichodge
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 71
- Joined: 2007/08/31 21:24:32
- Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar
2007/08/31 21:33:29
(permalink)
hi awiki01, in response to your post about using the SPDIF audio of the 0404... which did you select as the audio track's input in sonar? i cannot find the emu spdif in the list of inputs?
|